20
Social History: Schools, Methods and Case Studies Central European University, Budapest Fall 2006 Constantin Iordachi Department of History [email protected] Overview: The pivot of many novel developments in European and American historiography in the last decades, social history has evolved as a separate field of historical inquiry, bec oming ins tit uti onali ze d in ne w ac ade mi c de pa rtments, re sea rch insti tut es and spec ial izin g jour nals , such as  Journal of Social History, the International Review of Soci al His tory, Pa st and Pr es ent  , Compara tiv e Stu die s in Soc ie ty and Hi story , Geschich te und Gesellsc haft , etc. Duri ng the ti me , socia l histo ry ha s become very diverse, covering a multitude of theoretical stances, methodologica l practic es, and sub- disciplines. These include the history of social categories and social organization, of work, of towns, of peasants, of the family, of children, of consumptio n, of poverty, of sex and gender, of medicine, of mentalit é s, of demography, of crime, of popular culture, etc. It is therefore not surprising that no standard definition of social history has gained unanimous scholarly acceptance. Some historians define it negatively, in order to emphasiz e what social history is not (i.e. “history with the politics left out”), while others underline its inclusive character, defining social history positively as “total” history, and not just the study of politics. It is, however, commonly accepted that the rise of social hist ory has been intrin sica lly link ed to the develop men t of beh avio ural ism, with its cliometrician and quantitative approaches and the growing interaction between history and the neighboring fields of anthropology, literary studies, psychology, sociology and poli tica l scie nce. The prac tice of social hist ory encompasses a shif t of inte rest from political events to socio-economic structures, and a change in historical methods from narr ati ve to quan tita tive tec hniq ues and inte rdis cipl inar y mod els of inte rpre tati on. In addition, social history has always been “theoretically minded,” being characterized by the conscious and large-scale utilization of models and types of historical interpretation. The enlargement of the analytical focus from the history of political elites to that of wider socio-political groups has also stimulated the comparative study of societies at micro- and macro-level (be it global or regional). This course traces the development of social history as a discipline of history, from an interdisciplinary perspective. It examines main historiographical schools and approaches in the field; explores some of the methodological principles which underlie social history research and writing; and encourages reflection on controversial matters

41881164 Iordachi Social History

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • SocialHistory:Schools,MethodsandCaseStudies

    CentralEuropeanUniversity,BudapestFall2006

    [email protected]

    Overview:

    ThepivotofmanynoveldevelopmentsinEuropeanandAmericanhistoriographyinthelastdecades,socialhistoryhasevolvedasaseparatefieldofhistoricalinquiry,becoming institutionalized in new academic departments, research institutes andspecializing journals, such as Journal of Social History, the International Review of Social History, Past and Present, Comparative Studies in Society and History,Geschichte und Gesellschaft, etc. During the time, social history has become verydiverse,coveringamultitudeoftheoreticalstances,methodologicalpractices,and subdisciplines. These include the history of social categories andsocial organization, ofwork,oftowns,ofpeasants,ofthefamily,ofchildren,ofconsumption,ofpoverty,ofsexandgender,ofmedicine,ofmentalits,ofdemography,ofcrime,ofpopularculture,etc.

    It is therefore not surprising that no standard definition of social history hasgainedunanimousscholarlyacceptance.Somehistoriansdefineitnegatively,inordertoemphasizewhatsocialhistoryisnot(i.e.historywiththepoliticsleftout),whileothersunderlineitsinclusivecharacter,definingsocialhistorypositivelyastotalhistory,andnotjustthestudyofpolitics.Itis,however,commonlyacceptedthattheriseofsocialhistory has been intrinsically linked to the development of behaviouralism, with itscliometricianandquantitativeapproachesandthegrowinginteractionbetweenhistoryandtheneighboringfieldsofanthropology,literarystudies,psychology,sociologyandpolitical science. The practice of social history encompasses a shift of interest frompoliticaleventstosocioeconomicstructures,andachangeinhistoricalmethodsfromnarrative to quantitative techniques and interdisciplinary models of interpretation. Inaddition,socialhistoryhasalwaysbeentheoreticallyminded,beingcharacterizedbytheconsciousandlargescaleutilizationofmodelsandtypesofhistoricalinterpretation.Theenlargementoftheanalyticalfocusfromthehistoryofpoliticalelitestothatofwidersociopoliticalgroupshasalsostimulatedthecomparativestudyofsocietiesatmicroandmacrolevel(beitglobalorregional).

    Thiscoursetracesthedevelopmentofsocialhistoryasadisciplineofhistory,froman interdisciplinary perspective. It examines main historiographical schools andapproachesinthefield;exploressomeofthemethodologicalprincipleswhichunderliesocialhistoryresearchandwriting;andencouragesreflectiononcontroversialmatters

  • relatingtothewritingofsocialhistory.Whileitcanbesafelyappreciatedthateverytypeofhistorywritingimplicitlyemployselementsofsocialhistoryresearch,thecourseaimsto make these elements explicit, by increasing students awareness of the specifictheoreticalunderpinning,methodologicaltools,vocabulary,andsourcesassociatedwithsocial history.It ishopedthatthissystematic introductionwill furtherhonestudentsabilitytoengageinoriginalcomparativeresearch.

    Thecourseisdividedintointroduction,threemainparts,andconclusion.Afterabriefcontextual introduction, thefirst part focusesontheemergenceofsocial historyasareactiontothedominantpoliticalhistoryofthenineteenthcenturyanditscrystallizationin different national variants: the American behavioralism, the British neoMarxistGroupandhistoryfrombelow,thethreegenerationsoftheFrenchAnnalesandtheirinterest in deep structures and the longue dure of historical change; the GermanBielefeldschoolanditsparadigmofGesellschaftsgeschichte,andtheItalianschoolofmicrostoria. For eachnational school, in addition to historiographical overviews, arepresentativehistoricalwritingwillprovidethebasisforseminardiscussion.

    Thesecondpartcontinueswithadiscussionoftheinterdisciplinarydialogueandthedebates between social history and the social sciences, particularly sociology,anthropology and literary studies. It provides a review of recent trends such aspostmodern and poststructuralist challenges, the revival of the narrative and thefragmentationofthehistoricaldiscourse,assessingtheirimpactonthewritingofsocialhistory.Thethirdpartaddressesmainmethodologicalchallengesposedbysocialhistoryresearch,namelyissuesofsocialterminology,categorizationandspecializedvocabulary;generalizing from fragmentary evidence; understanding causality; establishingdifferences and similarities among historical phenomena; employing appropriateconcepts; andevaluatingcompetingexplanatoryaccounts.Finally, onthebasisofthecoursediscussion,theconclusionsofferaninformedandconstructivecritiqueofsocialhistory,openingstudentstofreshtransnationalandrelationalapproachestoregionalandEuropeansocialhistory.

    Thecoursecombineslargescalecomparisonswithmicrohistoricalanalyses,andrelationalandtransnationalapproacheswithknowledgeoflocaltrendsinhistoriography.Inordertoenablestudentstomakemeaningfulcomparisons,readingsamplesalternateshistoriographical debates with extracts from authoritative works of practitionerhistorians,suchasE.P.Thompson,MichelFoucault,ReinhartKoselleck,DanielRoche,EmmanuelLeRoyLadurie,andWilliamSewell.

    Inadditiontotheassignedreadingmaterials,thecoursesyllabusalsoprovidesgeneral bibliographical guidelines on the field of social history. Students are alsoencouragedtomonitortheactivityofnewresearchinstitutesandacademicdepartmentsonsocialhistoryinEastCentralEurope,suchastheInstituteofSocialHistoryoftheNational Academy of Science, Budapest; the Department of Economic and SocialHistory, ELTE University, Budapest; the Institute of Social History of the NationalAcademyofScience,Warsaw;theCentreforSocialHistoryattheInstituteofGeneralHistory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; the Association for SocialHistory,Belgrade;andtheInstituteofEconomicandSocialHistory,CharlesUniversity,Prague; and to consult new regional periodicals in the field, among which: ZG

  • sterreichische Zeitschrift fr Geschichtswissenschaften, (Vienna), Revista de IstorieSocial (Bucharest) Korall. Trdadalomtrtneti folyirat (Budapest), The RussianSocial History Yearbook/ Social'naja istorija. Ezhegodnik (Moscow), aslovek asponost (Bratislava), Godinjak za drutvenu istoriju/Annual for Social History(Belgrade), and the Prager wirtschafts und sozialhistorische Mitteilungen/PragueEconomicandSocialHistoryPapers.

    CourseRequirements:

    Studentsareexpectedtoattendallseminars,readtheassignedreadingsandpreparetoactivelyparticipateinseminardiscussions.Therequirementsandgradingbreakdownoftheseminarareasfollows: Seminarparticipation (30percent),basedonboththequantityandqualityofthe

    studentscontributionsandinvolvementduringdiscussionsofreadings; Bookpresentation(35percent);Titleswillbeselectedfromabooklistprovidedat

    theendofthesyllabus.Allreportsmustbecirca1.500wordsandshouldincludearelevantsummaryofalloftheimportanttopicsandconclusionscoveredinthebookand an analysis of the historical significance of the work. The analysis shouldevaluatetherelevanceofthebooktotheclassdiscussion,identifywhatkindofsocialhistory sources the book employs and what type of interpretation it applies tohistoricaleventsandcharacters,andprovideanevaluationofthehistoricalmeaningofthebooktothecontemporaryscholarlyaudiences.

    Finalessay(35percent):Afinalessayofapproximately4.000wordswillbeduetwoweeksafterthefinalseminar,onatopicrelevanttoboththecoursesubjectmatterandstudentsparticularresearchinterest.

    Course Topics :

    1.TheRiseofSocialHistory:PoliticalandHistoriographicalContexts2.SocialHistoryintheUSA3.SocialHistoryintheUnitedKingdom4.SocialHistoryinFrance5.SocialHistoryinGermany6.SocialHistoryandtheLinguisticTurn7.SocialHistoryandPostmodernism8.SocialHistoryandCulturalHistory9.MethodsofSocialHistoryResearch(I):QuantificationandComputerTechniques10. Methods of Social History Research (II): Vocabulary, Terminology and SocialCategorization11.VarietiesofSocialHistory:MicrohistoryandAlltagsgeschichte12.TowardaNewSocialHistory?

  • CourseOutlineandReadings:

    I.Introduction

    1.TheRiseofSocialHistory:PoliticalandHistoriographicalContext:

    Requiredreadings:

    GeoffElley,SomeRecentTendenciesinSocialStudies,inGeorgG.IggersandHarold T. Parker, eds., International handbook of Historical Studies: ContemporaryResearchandTheory(Westport,Conn.:GreenwoodPress,1979),pp.5570.

    HarryRitter, Social History, in DictionaryofConcepts in History (London,NewYork,Westpoint:TheGreenwoodPress,1986),pp.408413.

    Social History in D.R. Woolf, ed., A Global Encyclopedia of Historical Writing,2vols.(NewYork:GarlandPublications,1998),vol.2,pp.844849.

    C. Conrad, Social History in International Encyclopedia of the Social &Behavioral Sciences, ed. Neil H.Smelser, PaulBBaltes (Amsterdam,2001),vol.21,1429914306.

    I.NationalSchoolsandHistoriographicalTraditions:

    2.SocialHistoryintheUSA:

    RequiredReadings:

    GeorgG.Iggers, AmericanTraditionsofSocialHistory, inHistoriographyinthe Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge(Hanover,NH:WesleyanUniversityPress,1997),pp.4150.

    ErnstBreisach,AmericanProgressiveHistoryandHistoriographyasaMirrorofPostwarAmerica,in Historiography:Ancient,MedievalandModern(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1994),pp.362370,385394.

    Laurence Veysey, The New Social History in the Context of AmericanHistoricalWriting, ReviewsinAmericanHistory,Vol.7,No.1,(Mar.1979),pp.112.

    Articlepresentation: FrederickJ. Turner,SocialForcesinAmericanHistory,TheAmericanHistoricalReview,Vol.16,No.2(Jan.,1911),pp.217233.

    Furtherbibliography:

    FredAnderson,AndrewR.L.Cayton,TheProblemofFragmentationandtheProspectsfor Synthesis in Early American Social History, The William and Mary

  • Quarterly, Vol.50,No.2,EarlyAmericanHistory:ItsPastsandFuture(Apr.1993),pp.299310.

    RobertEGallman,SomeNotesontheNewSocialHistory,TheJournalofEconomic History,Vol.37,No.1,(Mar.1977),pp.312.

    3.SocialHistoryintheUnitedKingdom:

    Requiredreadings:

    Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Writing of Social History: Recent Studies of 19th

    CenturyEngland, TheJournalofBritishStudies,Vol.11,No.1,(Nov.1971),pp.148170.

    Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Group: British Marxist Historians, in The Newhistory and the Old (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of HarvardUniversityPress,1987),pp.7093.

    EricHobsbawm,FromSocialHistorytotheHistoryofSociety,inFelixGilbertand Graubard,Stephen,eds., HistoricalStudiesToday (NewYork:WWNorton,1972),pp.126.

    Bookpresentation:E.P.Thompson, TheMakingoftheEnglishWorkingClass (NewYork:RandomHouse,1963).

    Furtherbibliography:

    E. P. Thompson, Eighteenth century English society: class struggle without class?SocialHistory,Vol.2,No.5,(1978),pp.133165.

    N.B.Harte,TrendsinPublicationsontheEconomicandSocialHistoryofGreatBritainandIreland,19251974,TheEconomicHistoryReview,NewSeries,Vol.30,No.1,(Feb.1977),pp.2041.

    L.A.Clarkson,TheWritingofIrishEconomicandSocialHistorySince1968, TheEconomicHistoryReview,NewSeries,Vol.33,No.1,(Feb.1980),pp.100111.

    Richard E. Miller, Composing English Studies: Toward a Social History of theDiscipline, College Composition andCommunication, Vol. 45, No. 2, (May,1994),pp.164179.

    4.SocialHistoryinFrance:

    Requiredreadings:

    ErnstBreisach,TheAnnalesSchool,inHistoriography:Ancient,MedievalandModern(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1994),pp.370376.

    Georg G. Iggers, France: The Annales, in Historiography in the Twentieth Century,pp.5164.

  • Editors of Annales, Histoire et Sciences Sociales: Un Tournant critique,AnnalesESC43(Mar.Apr.1988),pp.291293,publishedinEnglishasHistoryandSocialScience:ACriticalTurningPointin JacquesReveland Lynn Hunt, eds., Histories: French constructions of the past,translatedbyArthurGoldhammer(NewYork:NewPress,1995),pp.480483.

    EditorsofAnnales,Tentonslexprience,AnnalesESC44(Nov.Dec.1989),pp. 13171323,publishedinEnglishasLets TrytheExperiment, inRevelandHunt,eds.,Histories:Frenchconstructionsofthepast,pp.484491.

    AntoineProst,WhatHasHappenedtoFrenchSocialHistory? TheHistorical Journal,Vol.35,No.3(Sept.1992),pp.671679.

    Bookpresentation: DanielRoche, AHistoryofEverydayThings:TheBirthof Consumption in France, 16001800, translated by Brian Pearce(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2000),309p.

    Furtherbibliography:

    AymandMaurice,TheAnnalesandFrenchHistoriography(19291972),inTheJournal ofEuropeanEconomicHistory,Vol.1,(1972),2,pp.491511.

    PeterBurke, TheFrenchHistoricalRevolution:TheAnnalesSchool,192989 (Oxford:PolityPress,1990).

    Clark,Stuart,ed.,TheAnnalesSchool:CriticalAssessments.4vols.(London:Routledge,1999).

    SocialHistoriansinContemporaryFrance:EssaysfromAnnales.EditedandtranslatedbythestaffofAnnales,Paris.NewYork:Harper&Row,1972.

    5.SocialHistoryinGermany:

    Requiredreadings:

    GeorgG.Iggers,CriticalTheoryandSocialHistory:HistoricalSocialScienceintheFederalRepublicofGermany,inHistoriographyintheTwentieth Century,pp.6577.

    Ernst Breisach, The Transformation of German Historiography, inHistoriography:Ancient,MedievalandModern,pp.378385.

    Jrgen Kocka, Theory and Social History: Recent Developments in WestGermany,inSocialResearch,47(1980)2,pp.426457.

    Bookpresentation:JrgenKocka,Facingtotalwar:Germansociety,19141918(LeamingtonSpa:Berg,1984).

    Furtherbibliography:

  • Iggers,GeorgG.TheGermanconceptionofhistory:thenationaltraditionofhistorical thought fromHerderto thepresent (Middletown, Conn.: WesleyanUniversityPress,1983).

    Iggers,GeorgG.TheSocialHistoryofPolitics:CriticalPerspectivesinWestGermanHistoricalWritingsince1945(Dover,N.H.:Berg,1985).

    7.SocialHistoryandtheLinguisticTurn:

    Requiredreadings:

    Georg G. Iggers, The Linguistic Turn: The End of History as a ScholarlyDiscipline? in Historiography in the Twentieth Century (Middletwon,CT:WesleyanUniversityPress,1997),pp.118133,and168170.

    ReinhartKoselleck,BegriffsgeschichteandSocialHistory,inFuturesPast.Onthe Semantics of Historical Time, trans. Keith Tribe (London andCambridge:MITPress,1985),pp.7392.

    Book presentation: Reinhart Koselleck, Preussen zwischen Reform undRevolution: allgemeines Landrecht, Verwaltung und soziale Bewegungvon1791bis1848(Stuttgart:Klett,1967).

    Furtherbibliography:

    RolandBarthes,TheDiscourseofHistory,ComparativeCriticism:AYearbook,vol.3(1981),pp.328.

    MelvinRichter,ReconstructingtheHistoryofPoliticalLanguages:Pocock,Skinnerandthe GeschichtlicheGrundbegriffe, HistoryandTheoryVol.29,No.1,(1990),pp.3869.

    Reinhart Koselleck, Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte in Wolfgang Schiederand Volker Sellin, eds., Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland: Entwicklungen undPerspektiven im internationalen Zusammenhang, 2 vols. (Gttingen:VandenhoeckandRuprecht,1987),vol.2,pp.89107.

    Hayden V. White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation(Baltimore:JohnsHopkinsUniversityPress,1987).

    Peter Burke and Roy Porter, eds. The Social History of Language (Cambridge,Cambridgeshire:CambridgeUniversityPress,1987).

    BryanPalmer, DescentintoDiscourse:TheReificationofLanguageandtheWritingof SocialHistory(Philadelphia:TempleUniversityPress,1990).

    8.SocialHistoryandPostmodernism:

    Requiredreadings:

  • Jane Caplan, Postmodernism, Poststructuralism, and Deconstruction. Notes forHistorians, CentralEuropeanHistory,Vol.22,No.3/4(1989),pp.260279.

    Rudy Koshar, Foucault and Social History: Comments on CombinedUnderdevelopment, TheAmerican Historical Review, Vol. 98, No. 2(April1993),pp.354363.

    Golstein,Jan,FoucaultamongtheSociologists:TheDiscipleandtheHistoryofProfession,HistoryandTheory,23(1984),pp.170192.

    Bookpresentation: Michel Foucault, Discipline andPunish: The Birth of the Prison,translatedfromtheFrenchbyAlanSheridan(NewYork:VintageBooks,1977).

    Furtherbibliography:

    F.R.AnkersmitHistoriographyandPostmodernism,HistoryandTheory,Vol.28No.2,(1989),pp.137153.

    Foucault,Michel, TheArchaeologyofKnowledge,translatedfromtheFrenchbyA.M.SheridanSmith,(London:Routledge,1972).

    Foucault,Michel,TheHistoryofSexuality,translatedfromtheFrenchbyRobertHurley,(NewYork:VintageBooks,19881990).

    9.SocialHistoryandCulturalHistory:

    Requiredreadings:

    WilliamH.Sewell, Jr.Theconcept(s)ofculture,inVictoriaE.BonnellandLynnHunt,eds.,Beyondtheculturalturn:newdirectionsinthestudyof societyandculture (Berkley,Cal.:UniversityofCaliforniaPress,1999,pp.3561.

    LynnHunt,Introduction:History,Culture, andTextinLynnHunt,ed., TheNew Cultural History, with an introduction by Lynn Hunt Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress,1989,pp.124.

    Fass, Paula S. Cultural History/Social History: Some Reflections on aContinuingDialogue,JournalofSocialHistory,(Fall2003),pp.3946.

    Book presentation: Lynn Hunt. Politics, culture, and class in the French Revolution(Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress,1984).

    Furtherbibliography:

    PatriciaOBrien,MichelFoucaultsHistoryofCultureinLynnHunt,ed., TheNewCultural History, withanintroduction byLynnHunt (Berkeley: University ofCaliforniaPress,1989),pp.2546.

  • Victoria E. Bonnell andLynnHunt Introduction, in Victoria E. Bonnell andLynnHunt,eds.,BeyondtheCulturalTurn:NewDirectionsintheStudyofSocietyand Culture; with an afterword by Hayden White Berkeley, Cal.: University ofCaliforniaPress,1999,pp.134.

    RogerChartier,IntellectualHistoryorSocioculturalHistory?TheFrenchTrajectories,Trans. Jane P. Kaplan, in Dominique La Capra and Steven L. Kaplan, eds., Intellectual History:Reappraisals andNewPerspectives (Ithaca, NY.: CornellUniversity Press, 1982), pp. 1346, republished in Revel and Hunt, eds.,Histories:Frenchconstructionsofthepast,pp.287297.

    III.MethodsofSocialHistory:

    9.SocialHistoryandGender

    10.QuantificationandComputerTechniques:

    Requiredreadings:

    EmmmanuelleRoyLadurie,TheHistorianandtheComputerinTheTerritoryoftheHistorian,trans.T.B.andSianRaynolds(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1979),pp.35.

    Franois Furet, Quantitative History in The Workshop of History, trans.JonathanMandelbaum(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1984),pp.4053.

    BernardLepetit,LHistoirequantitative:Deuxoutroischosesquejesaisdelle,Histoire et Mesure, 4 (1989), pp. 191199, published in English asQuantitative History: Another Approach, in Revel and Hunt, eds.,Histories:Frenchconstructionsofthepast,pp.503512.

    Chapter presentation: Miles Fairburn. To Count or not to Count in Social history:problems,strategies,andmethods(NewYork:St.Martin'sPress,1999),pp.145176.

    Furtherbibliography:

    Arthur E. Imhof and Oivind Larsen. Social and Medical History: MethodologicalProblemsinInterdisciplinaryQuantitativeResearch,JournalofInterdisciplinary History,Vol.7,No.3,(Winter1977),pp.493498.

    ChristopherLloyd,TheMethodologiesofSocialHistory:ACriticalSurveyandDefenseofStructurism,HistoryandTheory,Vol.30,No.2,(May1991),pp.180219.

    ArthurL.Stinchcombe, TheoreticalMethodsinSocialHistory (NewYork:AcademicPress,1978).

    11.Vocabulary,TerminologyandSocialCategorization:

  • Requiredreadings:

    AlfredCobban,TheVocabularyofSocialHistory,PoliticalScienceQuarterly,Vol.71,No.1(March1956),pp.117.

    DanielOrlovsky,SocialHistoryanditsCategories,SlavicReview,Vol.47,No.4(Winter1988),pp.620623.

    Articlepresentation:JrgenKocka,TheMiddleClassesofEurope,TheJournal ofModernHistory,Vol.67,No.4(1995),pp.783806.

    12.OralHistory,Microhistoryand Alltagsgeschichte :

    Requiredreadings:

    Giovanni Levi, On Microhistory, in Peter Burke, ed., New Perspectives onHistoricalWriting(Cambridge,EnglandPolityPress,1992),pp.93113.

    Jacques Revel, Microanalyse construction du sociale in Revel, ed., Laconstructiondusocial (Paris:Gallimard,1996),publishedinEnglishasMicroanalysisandtheConstructionoftheSocial,in RevelandHunt,eds.,Histories:FrenchConstructionsofthePast,492502.

    David F. Crew, Altagsgeschichte: A New Social History From Below?CentralEuropeanHistory,22(1989),pp.394407.

    Book presentation: Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou: Cathars andCatholics inaFrenchvillage, 12941324,TranslatedbyBarbaraBray.London:PenguinBooks,1990.

    Furtherbibliography:

    Geoff Eley, Review: Labor History, Social History, Alltagsgeschichte: Experience,Culture,andthePoliticsoftheEveryday:ANewDirectionforGermanSocialHistory?TheJournalofModernHistory, Vol.61,No.2(Jun.,1989),pp.297343.

    PatrickH.Hutton,PlacingHistoryinContemporaryHistoriography,inHistoryasanAct of Memory (Hanover and London: University of Press of New England,1993),pp.126.

    IV.Conclusions:

    13.TowardaNewSocialHistory?

    Requiredreadings:

    Steven.C.Hause,TheEvolutionofSocialHistory,FrenchHistoricalStudies,Vol.19,No.4,SpecialIssue:Biography(Autumn1996),pp.11911214.

    PatrickJoyce,TheEndofSocialHistory?inKeithJenkins, ThePostmodernHistoryReader(London:Routledge,1997),pp.341365.

  • GeoffreyElleyandKeithNield,StartingOver: ThePresent,thePostmodernandtheMomentofSocialHistory,inJenkins, ThePostmodernHistoryReader,pp.366379.

    Furtherbibliography:

    LutzNiethammer,TheDissolutionofHistory,inPosthistoire:HasHistoryCometoanEnd?(London:Verso,1992),pp.135152.

    PeterBurke,Overture:TheNewHistory.ItsPastandItsFuture,inBurke,ed., NewPerspectivesonHistoricalWriting(Cambridge,EnglandPolityPress,1992),pp.123.

    Gertrude Himmelfarb, SomeReflections on the NewHistory, AmericanHistorical Review,Vol.94,No.3,(1989),pp.661670.

    Peter Novick, The center does not hold in That Noble Dream. The Objectivity Question and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress,1988),pp.522527.

    JrnRnsen,StudiesinMetahistory,editedandintroducedbyPieterDuvenage(Pretoria:HumanSciencesResearchCouncil,1993).

    Listofbooksproposedforreview:

    Bloch,Marc.Apologiepourl'histoireouMetierd'historien.Paris:ArmandColin,1961.

    Duby, Georges. The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined, translated by ArthurGoldhammer; with a foreword by Thomas N. Bisson. Chicago: University ofChicagoPress,1980.

    Foucault, Michel. DisciplineandPunish:TheBirthofthePrison, translatedfromtheFrenchbyAlanSheridan.NewYork:VintageBooks,1977.

    Furet,Franois.PenserlaRevolutionfranaise.Paris:Gallimard,1978.

    Koselleck,Reinhart.PreussenzwischenReformundRevolution:allgemeinesLandrecht, VerwaltungundsozialeBewegungvon1791bis1848.Stuttgart:Klett,1967.

    Ladurie, Emmanuel LeRoy. Montaillou: CatharsandCatholics inaFrenchvillage, 12941324,TranslationofMontaillou,villageoccitande12941324.TranslatedbyBarbaraBray.London:PenguinBooks,1990.

    Roche, Daniel. AHistoryofEverydayThings:TheBirth of Consumption in France, 16001800,translatedbyBrianPearce.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2000.

    Sewell,William.WorkandRevolutioninFrance:TheLanguageofLaborfromtheOldRegimeto1848.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1980.

  • Thompson,E.P.TheMakingoftheEnglishWorkingClass.NewYork:RandomHouse,1963.

  • GeneralBibliography:

    Historiography:

    Barraclough,Geoffrey.Maintrendsinhistory.NewYork:Holmes&Meier,1979,259p.

    Breisach, Ernst. Historiography:ancient, medieval &modern. Chicago: University ofChicagoPress,1994,2nded,481p.

    Burke, Peter. New Perspectives on Historical Writing. University Park, Penn.:PennsylvaniaStateUniversityPress,1992,254p.

    Butterfield,H.TheWhigInterpretationofHistory.NewYork:Norton,1965,132p.

    Clark,Stuart,ed.TheAnnalesSchool:CriticalAssessments.4vols.London:Routledge,1999.

    Fogel,RobertWilliamandG.R.Elton.WhichRoadtothePast?:TwoViewsofHistory.NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress,1983,136p.

    Furet, Franois. The Workshop of History, trans. Jonathan Mandelbaum. Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1984.

    Himmelfarb,Gertrude.TheNewHistoryandtheOld.Cambridge,Mass.:BelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress,1987,209p.

    Hobsbawm,Eric.Onhistory.NewYork:NewPress,1997,305p.

    Howell, MarthaC.andWalter Prevenier. FromReliableSources:AnIntroductiontoHistoricalMethods.Ithaca,N.Y.:CornellUniversityPress,2001,207p.

    Iggers, GeorgG.ed. Marxist HistoriographyinTransformation:EastGermanSocial Historyinthe1980s.TranslatedbyBruceLittle.NewYork:StMartin'sPress,1991,263p.

    Iggers,GeorgG.HistoriographyintheTwentiethCentury:FromScientificObjectivityto thePostmodernChallenge.Hanover,NH:WesleyanUniversityPress,1997,182p.

    Iggers, Georg G. New Directions in European Historiography. Middletown, Conn.:WesleyanUniversityPress,1984Rev.ed.,267p.

    Iggers, Georg G. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of HistoricalThoughtfromHerdertothePresent. Middletown,Conn.:WesleyanUniversityPress,1983EditionRev.ed.,388p.

    Iggers,GeorgG.TheSocialHistoryofPolitics:CriticalPerspectivesinWestGermanHistoricalWritingsince1945.Dover,N.H.:Berg,1985,312p.

    Jenkins,Keith.On"whatishistory?"FromCarrandEltontoRortyandWhite.London:Routledge,1995,200p.

    Jenkins,Keith.Thepostmodernhistoryreader.London:Routledge,1997.

  • Ladurie, Emmmanuel le Roy The Territory of the Historian, trans. T. B. and SianRaynolds.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1979.

    Laqueur Walter and George L. Mosse, eds. The New History: Trends in Historical ResearchandWritingsinceWorldWarII.NewYork:Harper&Row,1967,265p.

    Marius,RichardandMelvinE.Page.AShortGuidetoWritingaboutHistory.NewYork:Longman,2002.4thed.,227p.

    Munslow,AlunandRobertA.Rosenstone,eds.ExperimentsinRethinkingHistory.NewYork,NY:Routledge,2004,245.

    PallaresBurke, Maria Lcia. The New History: Confessions and Conversations.Cambridge:Polity,2002,247p.

    Peter, Burke.TheFrenchHistoricalRevolution:TheAnnalesSchool,192989(Oxford:PolityPress,c1990).

    Powicke, F. M. Modern Historians and the Study of History: Essays and Papers.London:OdhamsPress,1955,256p.

    Revel, Jacques and Lynn Hunt, eds., Histories: French constructions of the past,translatedbyArthurGoldhammer.NewYork:NewPress,1995.

    Stuchtey,BenediktandEckhardtFuchs,eds.Writingworldhistory,18002000.London:GermanHistoricalInstitute,2003,367p.

    Tosh,John.ThePursuitofHistory:Aims,Methods,andNewDirectionsintheStudyof ModernHistory.London:Longman,1991,2nded.,243p.

    SocialHistory:

    Books:

    Andrle, Vladimir. ASocial Historyof TwentiethCenturyRussia. London: E. Arnold,1995,289p.

    Ayoberry,Pierre.TheSocialHistoryoftheThirdReich:19331945.TranslatedfromtheFrenchbyJanetLloyd.NewYork:NewPress,1999,380p.

    Black,ChristopherF.EarlyModernItaly:ASocialHistory. London:Routledge,2000,279p.

    Briggs,Asa.ASocialHistoryofEngland.NewYork:VikingPress,1984,1983,320p.

    Burke, Peter and Roy Porter, eds. The Social History of Language. Cambridge[Cambridgeshire]:CambridgeUniversityPress,1987,219p.

    Burke, Peter. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Burke.Cambridge,UK:PolityPress,2000,268p.

  • Burnett, John. A Social History of Housing, 18151985. Illustrated by ChristopherPowell.London:Routledge,1991c19862nded.,387p.

    Eisenstadt, ShmuelN.,WolfgangSchluchterandBjrnWittrock, eds. PublicSpheresandCollectiveIdentities.NewBrunswick,NJ:TransactionPublishers,2000,293p.

    Girouard, Mark. Cities andPeople: ASocial andArchitectural History. NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress,1989,c1985vii,397p.

    Griffin, LarryandMarcelvanderLinden,eds. NewMethodsinSocialHistory. NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress,1999.SupplementofInternationalReviewof SocialHistory.

    Grunberger,Richard.The12yearReich:ASocialHistoryofNaziGermany,19331945.NewYork:Holt,RinehartandWinston,1979,c1971,535p.

    Hall,JohnR. CulturesofInquiry:FromEpistemologytoDiscourseinSociohistorical Research.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1999.316p

    Hauser,Arnold.TheSocialHistoryofArt.translatedincollaborationwiththeauthorbyStanleyGodman.London:Routledge,19894v.

    Kaelble,Hartmut.ASocialHistoryofWesternEurope,18801980.TranslatedbyDanielBird.Dublin:GillandMacmillan,1990,214p.

    Lane, Joan. ASocial Historyof Medicine: Health, HealingandDisease in England, 17501950.NewYork:Routledge,2001,233p.

    Lloyd,Christopher.Explanationinsocialhistory.NewYork:B.Blackwell,1985.375p.

    Mazsu, Jnos. Thesocial history of the Hungarian intelligentsia, 18251914. Mazsu.Translated from the Hungarian by Mario D. Fenyo. Boulder, Colo.: SocialScienceMonographs,1997.

    Meriwether,MargaretL.andJudithE.Tucker,eds.SocialHistoryofWomenandGender intheModernMiddleEast.Boulder,Colo.:WestviewPress,1999,220p.

    Miles Fairburn. Social History: Problems, Strategies, and Methods. New York: St.Martin'sPress,1999,325p.

    Mironov, Boris with Ben Eklof. A Social History of Imperial Russia, 17001917.Boulder,Colo.:WestviewPress,1999,562p.

    Nothnagle,AlanL.BuildingtheEastGermanMyth:HistoricalMythologyandYouth Propaganda in the German Democratic Republic, 19451989. Ann Arbor:UniversityofMichiganPress,1999,208p.

    Outhwaite, R.B. ed. MarriageandSociety:StudiesintheSocialHistoryofMarriage.London:EuropaPublications,1981,284p.

    Palmer,Bryan. DescentintoDiscourse:TheReificationofLanguageandtheWritingof SocialHistory.Philadelphia:TempleUniversityPress,1990.

  • Parsons, Talcott. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. EnglewoodCliffs,N.J.:PrenticeHall,1966,120p.

    Price, Roger. ASocial Historyof NineteenthCenturyFrance. NewYork: Holmes&Meier,1987,403p.

    Shubert,Adrian.ASocialHistoryofModernSpain. London:UnwinHyman,1990,292p.

    Smith. Dorothy E. Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling.London:Routledge,1990,247p.

    SocialHistoriansinContemporaryFrance:EssaysfromAnnales.EditedandtranslatedbythestaffofAnnales,Paris.NewYork:Harper&Row,1972,327p.

    Stinchcombe,ArthurL. TheoreticalMethodsinSocialHistory.NewYork:AcademicPress,1978.130p.

    Tawney, R. H. Social History and Literature. London: Cambridge University Press,1950.

    Taylor,RobertM.Jr.andRalphJ.Crandall,eds.GenerationsandChange:Genealogical PerspectivesinSocialHistory. Macon,GA:MercerUniversityPress,1986,332p.

    Thane, Pat and Anthony Sutcliffe, eds. Essays in Social History. Oxford: ClarendonPress,1986,315p.

    Thomson,Alistair,etal.TheSocialHistoryofPovertyinCentralEurope.editorinchiefJuliaSzalai.Budapest:MaxWeberFoundationfortheStudyofSocialInitiatives,1995,302p.

    Tilly,Charles.AsSociologyMeetsHistory.NewYork:AcademicPress,1981,237p.

    Tilly,Charles.BigStructures,LargeProcesses,HugeComparisons.NewYork:RussellSageFoundation,1984,176p.

    ArticlesandBookChapters:

    SocialHistoryinD.R.Woolf,ed.,AGlobalEncyclopediaofHistoricalWriting,2vol.(NewYork:GarlandPublications,1998),vol.2,pp.844849.

    Allison,GaryD.JapaneseSocialHistory,TheJournalofAsianStudies,Vol.36,No.2,(Feb.1977),pp.400402.

    Anderson, Fred and AndrewR. L. Cayton, The Problemof Fragmentation and theProspects for Synthesis in Early American Social History, The WilliamandMaryQuarterly3rd.Ser.,Vol.50,No.2,EarlyAmericanHistory:ItsPastsandFuture(Apr.1993),pp.299310.

    Ankersmit.F.R.HistoriographyandPostmodernism,HistoryandTheory,Vol.28No.2,(1989),pp.137153.

  • Barthes,Roland.TheDiscourseofHistory,ComparativeCriticism:AYearbook,Vol.3(1981),pp.328.

    Braudel,Fernand. HistoryandtheSocialSciences. TheLongueDure,in OnHistory(Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress,1980),pp.2554.

    Bullock, Alan. Is History Becoming a Social Science? The Case of ContemporaryHistory,TheHistoryTeacher,Vol.11,No.4,(Aug.1978),pp.549561.

    Burke,Peter.Overture:TheNewHistory.ItsPastandItsFuture,inBurke(ed.),Newperspectivesonhistoricalwriting(Cambridge,EnglandPolityPress,1992),pp.123.

    Caroll,Lucy.Caste,SocialChange,andtheSocialScientist:ANoteontheAhistoricalApproachtoIndianSocialHistory,TheJournalofAsianStudies,Vol.35,No.1,(Nov.1975),pp.6384.

    Case,William.SocialHistoryandtheRevisionism oftheStalinistEra,RussianReview,Vol.46,No.4,(Oct.1987),pp.382385.

    Clarkson,L.A.TheWritingofIrishEconomicandSocialHistorySince1968, TheEconomicHistoryReview,NewSeries,Vol.33,No.1,(Feb.1980),pp.100111.

    Cobban,Alfred.TheVocabularyofSocialHistory, PoliticalScienceQuarterly,Vol.71,No.1(March1956),pp.117.

    Cohen,StephenF.StalinsTerrorAsSocialHistory,RussianReview,Vol.45,No.4,(Oct.1986),pp.375384.

    Conrad,C.SocialHistoryin InternationalEncyclopediaoftheSocial&Behavioral Sciences,ed.NeilH.Smelser,PaulBBaltes(Amsterdam,2001),vol.21,1429914306.

    Elley, Geoff. Some Recent Tendencies in Social Studies, in Georg G. Iggers andHarold T. Parker, eds., International handbook of Historical Studies: ContemporaryResearchandTheory. Westport,Conn.:GreenwoodPress,1979,pp.5570.

    Eubank,EarleEdward.TheVocabularyofSociology, SocialForces, Vol.9,No.3,(Mar.,1931),pp.305320.

    Fass, Paula S. Cultural History/Social History: Some Reflections on a ContinuingDialogue,JournalofSocialHistory(Fall2003),pp.3946.

    Francis G. Couvares. Telling a Story in Context; Or, What's Wrong with SocialHistory? TheoryandSociety, Vol. 9, No. 5, Special IssueonSocial History(Sep.,1980),pp.674676.

    Freeze,GregoryL.TheSoslovie(Estate)ParadigmandRussianSocialHistory, TheAmericanHistoricalReview,Vol.91,No.1,(Feb.1986),pp.1136.

    Gallman,RobertE.SomeNotesontheNewSocialHistory,TheJournalofEconomic History,Vol.37,No.1,(Mar.1977),pp.312.

  • Hareven,TamaraK.TheHistoryoftheFamilyandtheComplexityofSocialChange,TheAmericanHistoricalReview,Vol.96,No.1(Feb.1991),pp.95124.

    Harte,N.B.TrendsinPublicationsontheEconomicandSocialHistoryofGreatBritainandIreland,19251974,TheEconomicHistoryReview,NewSeries,Vol.30,No.1,(Feb.1977),pp.2041.

    Hause,Steven.C.TheEvolutionofSocialHistory,FrenchHistoricalStudies,Vol.19,No.4,SpecialIssue:Biography(Autumn1996),pp.11911214.

    Hexter,J.H.ANewFrameworkforSocialHistory,TheJournalofEconomicHistory,Vol.15,No.4,(Dec.1955),pp.415426.

    Himmelfarb, Gertrude. SomeReflections on theNewHistory, AmericanHistorical Review,94(1989)3,pp.661670.

    Himmelfarb,Gertrude.TheWritingofSocialHistory:RecentStudiesof19thCenturyEngland, TheJournalofBritishStudies,Vol.11,No.1,(Nov.1971),pp.148170.

    Imhof, Arthur E. and Oivind Larsen. Social and Medical History: MethodologicalProblemsinInterdisciplinaryQuantitativeResearch,JournalofInterdisciplinary History,Vol.7,No.3,(Winter1977),pp.493498.

    Kocka, Jrgen. TheMiddleClassesof Europe. TheJournal of ModernHistory 67(1995)4:783806.

    Kocka,Jrgen.TheoryandSocialHistory:RecentDevelopmentsinWestGermany,SocialResearch,Vol.47,No.2,(1980),pp.426457.

    Koselleck, Reinhart. Begriffsgeschichte andSocialHistory,in FuturesPast.OntheSemanticsofHistoricalTime,trans.KeithTribe(LondonandCambridge:MITPress,1985),pp.7392.

    Koselleck, Reinhart. Sozialgeschichte undBegriffsgeschichte in WolfgangSchiederand Volker Sellin, eds., Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland: Entwicklungen undPerspektiven im internationalen Zusammenhang, 2 vols. (Gttingen:VandenhoeckandRuprecht,1987),vol.2,pp.89107.

    Koshar, Rudy. Foucault and Social History: Comments on CombinedUnderdevelopment, TheAmericanHistorical Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, (April1993),pp.354363.

    Kusmer,KennethL.AmericanSocialHistory:TheBoorstinExperience, ReviewsinAmericanHistory,Vol.4,No.4,(Dec.,1976),pp.471482.

    Lenski,Gerhard.HistoryandSocialChange,TheAmericanJournalofSociologyVol.82,No.3,(Nov.1976),548564.

    Lipsitz,George.TheApotheosisofGlory:SurveyingSocialHistory,TheJournalof AmericanHistory,Vol.81,No.2,(Sept.1994),pp.585591.

  • Lloyd, Christopher. The Methodologies of Social History: A Critical Survey andDefenseofStructurism, HistoryandTheory,Vol.30,No.2,(May1991),pp.180219.

    Lloyd,DavidandPaulThomas,CultureandSocietyorCultureandtheState?Social Text,No.30,(1992),pp.2756.

    Maurice,Aymand.TheAnnalesandFrenchHistoriography(19291972),inTheJournal ofEuropeanEconomicHistory,Vol.1,No.2,(1972),pp.491511.

    Miller, Richard E. Composing English Studies: Toward a Social History of theDiscipline, College Composition and Comunication, Vol. 45, No. 2, (May,1994),164179.

    Moore,LeonardJoseph.GoodOldFashionedNewSocialHistoryandtheTwentiethCenturyAmericanRight, ReviewsinAmericanHistory, Vol.24,No.4 (Dec.1996),pp.555573.

    Nolan,Mary.TheHistorikerstreitandSocialHistory,NewGermanCritique,No.44,SpecialIssueontheHistorikerstreit(SpringSummer,1988),pp.5180.

    Novick, Peter. The center does not hold, in That Noble Dream. The Objectivity Question and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress,1988),pp.522527.

    Orlovsky,Daniel. SocialHistoryandItsCategories, SlavicReview, Vol.47,No.4,(Winter1988),pp.620623.

    Payne, HarryC. TheNovel as Social History: AReflection onMethodology, TheHistoryTeacher,Vol.11,No.3,(May.1978),pp.341351.

    Prost,Antoine.WhatHasHappenedtoFrenchSocialHistory?TheHistoricalJournal,Vol.35,No.3,(Sept.1992),pp.671679.

    Richter, Melvin. ReconstructingtheHistoryofPolitical Languages:Pocock,Skinnerand the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, History and Theory, Vol. 29, No. 1,(1990),pp.3869.

    Ritter, Harry. Social History, in Dictionary of Concepts in History (London, NewYork,Westpoint:TheGreenwoodPress,1986),pp.408413.

    Smith, M. G. History and Social Anthropology, The Journal of the Royal AnthropologicalInstituteofGreatBritainandIreland,Vol.92,No.1,(Jan.June1962),pp.7385.

    Suny, Ronald Grigor. Revision and Retreat in the Historiography of 1917: SocialHistoryandItsCritics, RussianReview, Vol.53,No.2 (Apr.,1994),pp.165182.

    Suny, Ronald Grigor. Toward A Social History of the October Revolution, TheAmericanHistoricalReview,Vol.88,No.1(Feb.1983),pp.3152.

    Thompson, E. P. Eighteenth century English society: class struggle without class?

  • SocialHistory,Vol.2,No.5,(1978),pp.133165.

    Tilly, Charles. TwoCallings ofSocial History, TheoryandSociety, Vol. 9, No.5,SpecialIssueonSocialHistory(Sep.1980),pp.679681.

    Tilly, LouiseA.Social HistoryandIts Critics, TheoryandSociety, Vol. 9, No.5,SpecialIssueonSocialHistory(Sep.,1980),pp.668670.

    Turner, Frederick J. Social Forces in American History, The American Historical Review,Vol.16,No.2(Jan.,1911),pp.217233.

    Veysey, Laurence. TheNewSocial History in theContext ofAmericanHistoricalWriting,ReviewsinAmericanHistory,Vol.7,No.1,(Mar.1979),pp.112.

    Course Topics:1. The Rise of Social History: Political and Historiographical ContextsCourse Outline and Readings:12. Oral History, Microhistory and Alltagsgeschichte: