7. Tim Dalby

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    1/22

    Tim Dalby 145

    Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming

    Skilled in the Art of Manipulation

    Tim Dalby

    Jeonju University

    Abstract

    In language teaching situations all over the world, course books arethe mainstay of many teachers lessons. Whether new or experiencedas a teacher it soon becomes apparent that assigned course books have

    advantages and disadvantages for a class at any given time. This paperattempts to review current thinking on the use of course books forlanguage teaching and then provide a series of adaptation methodsto help teachers ensure a better fit between the course book materials

    and their learners needs.

    Keywords: course books, curriculum, syllabus, materials, Korea, pro-fessional development.

    I . Course Books Arent All Bad

    Take a random selection of teachers and ask them what they think

    of their current course book and you will probably get an overwhelming

    sigh and some sporadic grumbling. Ask these same teachers to then

    think about the advantages and disadvantages of course books and

    you will hopefully get a more circumspect discussion ending with a

    fairly evenly balanced list. I have tried this activity during several

    course book workshops with over one hundred English language teachers

    in Korea from a variety of teaching backgrounds and contexts. The

    lists I get are generally similar and the main points are discussed in

    more detail below.

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    2/22

    146 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    1.1 Advantages

    Course books provide guidance

    As is the case in many parts of the world, many teachers in academies

    and the public school system in Korea have no formal English-language

    teaching qualifications or experience (Maley, 1992; Shin, 2004, p.68).

    For these teachers, course books can provide a welcome level of guidance

    on how to teach particular language structures or skills (Ur, 1991, p.184).

    They can also provide professional development opportunities

    (Cunningsworth, 1995; Cunningsworth & Kusel, 1991; Littlejohn, 1992;

    Richards, 1993) in addition to those provided by their employers (if

    any) or organizations such as Korea TESOL.

    Course books save time.

    For the busy teacher, a course book means a reduction in the amount

    of planning that is required to teach a class (Graves, 2000, p.174).Materials are (usually) neatly presented along with a series of activities

    which takes the leg work out of lesson planning.

    Course books provide a starting point for further activities.

    The topics that are covered in course books provide teachers with

    a jumping off point from which they can delve into deeper areas with

    their learners. This could include getting into aspects of culture, looking

    at different viewpoints in an argument and doing research. This view

    is supported by Harmer (2001, p.8) who talks about course books as

    ...proposals for action, not instructions for use. It refutes the idea

    that teachers slavishly follow a course book. Take the example of commu-

    nicative language teaching in Vietnam where materials are used in

    the classroom in a wholly different way than intended by the materials

    developers (Kramsch & Sullivan, 1996, p.202).

    Course books provide structure.

    In any communicative language classroom there is a level of un-

    certainty and change that can be both threatening and uncomfortable

    for learners. The course book provides a structure so that the level

    of unpredictability is reduced for learners and the learning event becomes

    more tolerable (Crawford, 2002, p.83). Likewise, the course of study

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    3/22

    Tim Dalby 147

    is predictable for the teacher who is able to see how a particular lesson

    fits into the course of study.

    Learners expect a course bookAlthough a teacher in Korea may believe this to be a particularly

    Korean issue, it is more widespread than that. Learners like to have

    a course book because it gives them some control over their learning

    (Crawford, 2002, p.83). There is also the view of course books providing

    both authority and expertise (de Castell, Luke, & Luke 1989), where

    teachers handouts do not (Harwood, 2005, p.151).

    1.2 Disadvantages

    Course books are a straitjacket.

    For more experienced teachers, a course book can limit the amount

    of creativity and freedom allowed for a class. This is especially truein large programs where the learners are given tests which are based

    on the course book. This is a form of negative washback which affects

    the teachers and learners alike (Taylor 2005, p.154).

    Course books are poorly designed.

    Of course this depends on the course book, but it is fair to say

    that production standards vary from publisher to publisher in terms

    of the quality of the paper used, the layout, and the number of typographical

    errors encountered in any given publication. One workshop participant

    described a teachers book she was assigned as being unusable as it

    was written entirely in Korean.

    Course book topics are boring and/or irrelevant.

    Most teachers would agree that at some stage they have come across

    a topic that bears no relevance to themselves or their learners. It could

    be that the materials are out of date or feature a celebrity that has

    no following in a particular country. Either way, the materials lose

    validity for the learners and teachers alike.

    Course books are culturally removed.

    As many course books hail from British or American roots, it is

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    4/22

    148 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    likely that learners in an EFL situation (i.e. where English is not a

    common language), will not be able to relate to the materials presented.

    Likewise, books used in Korea that were developed in Japan carry

    images and content that is specific to a Japanese context

    somethingunlikely to be appreciated by many Koreans. Richards similarly suggests

    that in course books an idealized white middle-class view of the world

    is portrayed as the norm (2001, p.255). It is possibly because of this

    that the Korean Ministry of Education has tried to instill Korean values

    in public sector course books (Yim, 2007, p.45).

    Course book language is not authentic.

    Although this is beginning to change, course book dialogues are

    generally written within a limited list of headwords or to incorporate

    and practice specific language points and are therefore not authentic

    or realistic (Richards, 2001, p.255). While this can lead to issues of

    credibility for some teachers, others see simplified English as a stepping

    stone towards being able to cope with authentic English (for more

    on the cult of authenticity, see Day & Bamford, 1998).

    1.3 Balance

    There are of course many other arguments that can be leveled both

    for and against the use of course books (see for example, Crawford,

    2002; Graves, 2000; Harwood, 2005; Richards, 2001; Ur, 1991 for

    more in-depth analysis). In the end, we need to accept the fact that

    course books are not going away anytime soon. Most of us, at some

    time, need to use them, so we should try to find the best way to

    incorporate them into our program of learning.

    II. Evaluating Course Books

    Before this can be done, there is a need to understand a course

    book in a particular context. Course books are necessarily a compromise

    between what the authors want to produce using the very latest and

    best teaching methodologies, and what publishers know will sell (for

    an in-depth analysis of how a course book is produced from conception

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    5/22

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    6/22

    150 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    of our teaching style is wrapped up in our personality (Hunt & Joyce,

    1967) and so it is important that the style of the book and the activities

    within match up with our own method of teaching. Does the book

    focus on grammar, or does it have lots of fluency activities, groupwork and mingling? Are the questions open-ended, or of the yes/no

    variety?

    Appearance

    As discussed in the section above, the appearance of a book can

    greatly affect how it is perceived and accepted by teachers and learners

    alike. If a book looks very busy, it can be overwhelming for learners.

    If there are a lot of mistakes, the teacher is likely to question the

    level of expertise of the course book writer. Clearly laid out activities,

    bright colors and adequate amount of white space can go a long way

    towards making a book acceptable.

    Teacher-friendly

    This applies to how easy or difficult it is for the teacher to use.

    If the book has teaching ideas, it may actually form part of a teachers

    professional development (Cunningsworth, 1995; Cunningsworth &

    Kusel, 1991; Littlejohn, 1992; Richards, 1993). The book should save

    the teacher time, and so information should be easy to find. An index

    or table of contents with the skills and/or grammar focus of each unit

    should be included along with an answer key to exercises.

    Extras

    Some books come with a wealth of extras which might includedownloadable listening activities, a DVD, an adaptable workbook, a

    student CD, a website, a teachers book and supplemental materials.

    Other course books come with little more than just the student book.

    How many or how few extras a course book comes with will determine

    how much lesson planning work a teacher has to do along with how

    much searching a teacher will need to do to find materials that are

    suitable for her class. Of course, extras need to be easy to use too.

    Realistic

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    7/22

    Tim Dalby 151

    With the advent and increasing use of corpuses and concordances,

    the ability for course books to use authentic language has increased

    dramatically over the last few years. Some course books, such as the

    Touchstone series, now state that they are using corpus data in theirbooks (McCarthy, McCarten, & Sandiford, 2005). Of course, being

    authentic is one thing, being up to date is another. A course book

    filled with out of date slang is unlikely to ring true with learners and

    teachers alike. Deciding what is authentic and balancing it with words

    that will have lasting appeal is a difficult task. Take the example of

    bovvered which was Oxford English Dictionarys word of 2006 and

    now is rarely heard, if at all, especially outside the British Isles. Check

    the OEDs website if you are not sure what this word means.

    Interesting

    By looking at the topics in a course book, a teacher can decide

    if they are relevant and interesting to his or her learners. It is also

    important to ensure that the topics are relevant and interesting to the

    teacher as she has to use the topics as a vehicle for teaching. As well

    as the obvious advantages in terms of schema activation that interesting

    topics afford, interested learners tend to be more focused in class and

    less likely to engage in disruptive behavior (Hidi, 1990).

    Affordable

    Although this may be outside the realm of either the teacher or

    the learner, the cost of a course book should have some level of bearing

    on the value a learner places on the book. If the book is too cheap,

    it may not be valued by the learner as authoritative. If it is too expensive,the learner may have unrealistic expectations about how much they

    will achieve by using the book. Also, in countries like Korea where

    there is a strong expectation to finish any given course book (Carless,

    2003, p.492), an expensive book may limit the teachers ability to

    skip activities or units as learners may feel they didnt get the full

    value out of the book they purchased.

    Level

    The course book should be aimed at the level of the learners being

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    8/22

    152 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    taught. While there is an onus on institutions to provide leveled classes

    where learners in any given class have similar levels of language ability,

    it is not always practical or achievable to do this. Whether classes

    are leveled or not, the course book should provide for either situation:flexibility in the multi-level class, and congruence in the leveled class.

    Skills

    The final section is about what kind of class is being taught. If

    it is a multi-skills class, does the course book adequately cover the

    skills that are required? If it is a conversation class, does the course

    book teach conversation skills, or is it merely a speaking course? Does

    a writing book have a process or product approach to writing? Does

    a reading book look to develop reading skills into reading strategies,

    or does it merely have a reading section followed by comprehension

    questions? Whatever the situation, the course book needs to fit the

    class syllabus, whether it is imposed or negotiated.

    III. The Art of Manipulation

    Whatever ratings a course book may receive after being given a

    thorough evaluation, at some point it needs to be used in the classroom.

    The level of fit between the needs of the learners and the resources

    available in a course book will vary from course to course and class

    to class and so, to be effective, the teacher will need to manipulate

    the materials in some way. Graves explains that course book adaptation

    can happen at three different levels

    the activity level, the unit leveland the syllabus level (2000, p.188). Syllabus level adaptation is taking

    a course book and reordering the units and/or adding supplementary

    materials to the units to better fit the learners needs over a course

    of study. At the unit level, the steps in the order of activities in a

    unit are changed. In an example of this, Graves gave twelve activities

    from a course book unit to groups of teachers and asked them to produce

    a unit plan for their students. At the end of the activity, each group

    had reordered the units in a totally unique way, and none matched

    the original course book order (2000, p.197). For simplicity at this

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    9/22

    Tim Dalby 153

    level, I will again turn to Tanner & Greens categories which I have

    adapted into the easy-to-remember acronym DEAR (1998, p.122).

    3.1 Four Basic Methods of Manipulation at the Unit Level

    Delete

    In this scenario the materials or activity are simply not covered.

    In some situations, whether it is due to a lack of time, the level of

    difficulty or the relevance of the materials to an upcoming test, the

    teacher can decide to move on to the next section.

    Edit

    By editing we basically take the activity that we have been given

    and change it to make it more relevant, interesting, up to date, or

    practical. A nice device that I have seen is in the Smart Choice series

    where the resource book pages are provided on a CD as editable documentsallowing me to change the names of characters to the names of students

    in my class (Wilson, 2007). I can also change the photos to use well-known

    Korean celebrities or the students themselves.

    Add

    In some course books, teachers notice a gap between two adjacent

    activities. For instance, a listening activity may contain key vocabulary

    that has not previously been covered on the course. In this case, the

    teacher could add an activity to introduce this vocabulary to the students.

    Similar examples could include a prediction activity before reading,

    or a research project before a debate.

    Replace

    The final option is a combination of the first three where an activity

    is provided in the course book, deemed unsuitable by the teacher, and

    so replaced with something that will work with a given set of learners.

    Teachers familiar with resource books such as Speaking Extra

    (Gammidge, 2004), Vocabulary Games and Activities 1 (Watcyn-Jones,

    2001), or Grammar Games and Activities 1 (Watcyn-Jones &

    Howard-Williams, 2001), for example, have materials to hand which

    will neatly replace a course book unit with something more engaging.

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    10/22

    154 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    Replacement of activities also encourages teachers to build up their

    own set of resources which can be used at a moments notice or to

    liven up their classes at the end of the week. This is what Maley

    refers to as the wet Friday afternoon effect (1998, p. 281).

    3.2 Practical Techniques at the Activity Level

    At the activity level, there are several resources for the teacher

    to refer to including Maley, who provides a comprehensive list of the

    ways in which a course book can be manipulated (1998, pp.281-283)

    and Ur (1991) who looks at how activities can be adapted to match

    the skills taught. The suggestions given below are ideas based largely

    on a handout I was given by Paul Michel while working at the Caledonian

    School in Prague, Czech Republic along with ideas that I have collected

    over the past nine years. They may not all work with all levels of

    learners, in all cultures all the time, but are provided as examples of

    what can be done with various materials that are generally available

    in course books. As Bruton argues, there is a certain sameness about

    course books (1997, p.276) which should mean that the activities offered

    below can be used with most course books most of the time.

    3.3 If You Have a Written Text

    Course books generally contain texts of varying lengths, whether

    they are an integral part of the course book or thrown in as additional

    activities in the teachers guide. In most cases, course book texts follow

    the basic process which has learners reading the text and then answeringcomprehension questions. The following adaptations can be used with

    texts of all shapes and sizes.

    Role play or mime characters from the text or act out the story.

    In a text which involves characters, has a story, or is an event,

    ask learners to choose a character and mime or act out the characters

    role in the story. They can use a dialogue that is already in the text,

    or, more creatively, create a dialogue that fits the story in the text.

    This could be done in class or assigned as a video project.

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    11/22

    Tim Dalby 155

    Create a prequel to the story.

    If you have a story, get the learners to write or act out a prequel.

    Ask them what they think could have happened before the story got

    started, what were the characters doing etc.

    Continue the story.

    As above except this time the learners figure out what happened

    next. Again, they could do this using drama, posted as a video project

    on the class website or a group writing assignment.

    Discuss or debate the issue. Ask provocative questions.

    Discussions and debates are excellent ways of practicing speaking,

    and for a text that involves a somewhat controversial topic, learners

    can discuss or debate the issues around it. For an added level of difficulty,

    have learners that are for an issue speak for the against team as

    this can enhance their skills of persuasion. It also helps learners to

    understand that there are two (or more) sides to every issue. To help

    learners get started, the teacher can ask provocative questions to invite

    reaction. Over time, learners can be encouraged to do the same.

    FIGURE 1

    Reply to the author (Touchstone Level 2, p. 41)

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    12/22

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    13/22

    Tim Dalby 157

    as research consistently shows that readers with background knowledge

    of a topic read more effectively (Alderson, 2000, p.44).

    3.4 If You Have a Listening Activity

    Like reading, listening is generally considered a receptive skill,

    but, also like reading, is far more interactional than that (Grabe, 1991;

    Richards, 1983). Like reading, many course books follow a pattern

    of listen and then answer questions with the questions often being

    answered during the listening activity. Unlike reading, learners cannot

    control the speed of the input, so other adaptations are offered below

    which are more specific to various listening texts.

    Predict the answers. Bet on the answers.

    Sometimes comprehension questions are written in such a way that

    the answers can be fairly easily predicted. Even if not, by having learners

    predict the answers to questions, they have more reason to listen. This

    can be further enhanced by having learners in groups betting on the

    answers in a whole-class team game.

    Make the questions easier.

    It is not always well understood that pretty much any piece of

    listening can be used in a class. What makes an activity easy or difficult

    is what you expect learners to do. If you find you have questions

    that your learners are finding too difficult, make them easier. You

    can do this by giving answer choices or simply making questions closed

    rather than open.

    Topic prediction, semantic mapping, gist listening and summaries.

    As in the reading activity above, by giving learners a title or a

    picture that is associated with the listening text, learners can try to

    predict the topic and/or the vocabulary that they are likely to hear

    in the recording. Then, by asking one or two global questions, learners

    can confirm their predictions and listen for gist without worrying

    about understanding all the details. Once done, learners can move on

    to the course book comprehension questions and then write a summary

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    14/22

    158 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    of what they heard.

    Vocabulary grab.

    This is an incredibly enjoyable activity that students of all agesenjoy. Choose a listening script which has some vocabulary that you

    want to target. Put learners into groups and give each group some

    slips of paper the same number of slips as target words. Have each

    group write down one target word on one slip of paper until they

    have all the target words written down. Groups put all the slips face

    up in front of them. As the learners listen to the recording, they have

    to grab the correct piece of paper with the word that they hear as

    they hear it. The learner with the most pieces of paper in the group

    wins. This is, roughly speaking, a scanning activity for listening and

    can be used just as effectively when watching a video. In this case,

    the words can be things that learners see, rather than hear.

    3.5 If You Have a Picture

    One of the best and most adaptable resources in a course book

    is the pictures which accompany topics, units and skills activities. Images

    are often specially commissioned by publishers to fit with whatever

    is on the course book page. The activities offered below are quite

    extensive and are for various types of image. Of course, not every

    suggestion will be for every type of picture.

    Describe the people, places, actions and things in the picture.

    There are several things that a learner can talk about includingwhat they know or think about the place, city, or country in the picture.

    They can be encouraged to think about the people, the food, the music,

    the architecture, forms of dress, the climate, the religion, traditions,

    customs, what daily life is like, the leaders, the type of politics, the

    history, or the sports that the country enjoys or is well known for.

    In the example below from Breakthrough, Level 1, learners could be

    encouraged to discuss what they know about each culture (Craven,

    2008).

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    15/22

    Tim Dalby 159

    FIGURE 2

    What do you know about each culture?

    (Breakthrough Level 1, p. 66)

    Compare and contrast.

    Learners faced with a picture of a place or a person can compare

    or contrast them with a place or person they know (such as the teacher).

    If there are two or more pictures on a similar theme, they can be

    compared or contrasted. Learners could speculate on where they woul

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    16/22

    160 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    like to live and why or which person they would like to be and why.

    Images of celebrations, traditional ceremonies and festivals could be

    compared and contrasted with similar events in Korea. For a more

    creative angle, groups of learners could create a ceremony, holidayor tradition similar to the picture. The picture could encourage learners

    to write a story or a newspaper article with the learners as reporters,

    again with a comparison or a contrast to what occurs in Korea.

    Speculate about the picture.

    Getting learners to think outside the box, or picture in this case,

    helps to get the creative juices flowing. Ask learners to decide whats

    happening outside the picture and why. They could discuss or write

    about why the people are there, who they are, what they are doing,

    their relationship, when they arrived, how long they have been there,

    when they will leave, how they are feeling and why.

    Thinking more about a person, learners could speculate about the

    persons job, age, education, family, lifestyle, nationality, their hobbies,

    personal relationships, political opinions and musical tastes. They could

    think about the persons favorites in terms of the food they like, the

    types of restaurants they go to, the vacations they take, and sports

    they enjoy. Learners could think about what the person or people did

    yesterday, what they have done in their lives, what they are doing

    later today, what they are going to do next year, a secret they have,

    or a crime they have committed.

    If the picture shows a group of people, learners could rank the

    people in terms of who earns the most money, who is the most educated,

    who has the most interesting job, who has the most friends or enemies,or who is most likely to commit a serious crime. Once done, learners

    could compare their rankings and discuss any differences. Learners

    could decide who they would most or least like to have dinner with

    and why. They could discuss which of these people they would be

    and why.

    If the picture shows a problem, learners could talk about the problem

    being shown, why the problem developed, and possible solutions to

    the problem. In a cityscape, learners could discuss everyday life in

    the city, the possible advantages and disadvantages of living in the

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    17/22

    Tim Dalby 161

    city and compare this with living in the country, the sounds, noises

    and smells of the city. Thinking more about vocabulary, learners could

    figure out how new vocabulary in the course book can be related to

    the picture. Ask learners to think about whether they would like tolive in the city and why. They could also think about whether they

    would like to visit this place and, if so, who and what they would

    take with them and why.

    Production.

    For more focused production activities, take a picture and have

    learners talk non-stop for one minute about the picture without hesitation

    or repetition. Have learners look at two pictures then, in pairs or threes,

    see how many sentences they can make about the first picture in one

    minute. Then do the same for the second picture, but learners have

    to try to beat their first score. Learners could be asked to look at

    a picture for one minute, close their books and then tell a partner

    everything they remember about the picture, as in the example below

    from Top Notch Level 1 (Saslow & Ascher, 2006).

    FIGURE 3

    Remember as much as you can.

    (Top Notch Level 1, p. 76)

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    18/22

    162 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    Learners could also ask each other their opinions about the picture.

    Learners could be encouraged to use the target grammar, vocabulary

    or exponents to interview a person, object or animal in the picture.

    If it is an event, the learners could interview an eyewitness. If it isa city, interview someone who lives there.

    Have learners brainstorm anything that comes to mind about the

    picture. They could give a personal reaction to what they see as

    in the example below from Top Notch Level 1 (Saslow & Ascher,

    2006). They could talk about how they feel about a particular person,

    event or place shown in the picture. They could talk about which parts

    of the picture are most or least important to them and why.

    FIGURE 4

    Write a personal reaction to the story

    (Top Notch Level 1, p. 72)

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    19/22

    Tim Dalby 163

    IV. Final Thoughts

    Throughout the world, teachers of English language are thrust into

    a classroom, course book in hand and told, Teach that! It is neitherideal, nor pedagogically sound, but it is the reality of an ever-expanding

    and diverse industry. No matter how controlled the working environment

    is, there is always room for adaptation at the activity level. As a teacher

    becomes more proficient, the activities suggested above will become

    second nature and lesson planning will become easier with more focus

    on what the learners require. A teacher may even start to enjoy using

    a course book for the challenge of adapting it to his or her learners!

    In a less controlled environment, teachers will have the ability to

    adapt course books on the unit level. At this point, course books become

    less of a crutch and more of a tool. Teachers have more freedom and,

    as they experiment and learn about what works and what does not

    work, they will begin to gain an insight into syllabus and curriculum

    design.

    As a teachers experience grows, and as they move into more senior

    teaching positions, educators will have both the confidence and experi-

    ence to adapt course books at the syllabus level. It is worth remembering

    though that the teachers who have to work with a syllabus are probably

    busy adapting the materials that have been so carefully prepared. My

    hope is that senior teachers in course management positions will see

    this as a positive step in their staff and so reward and encourage them

    for their efforts. After all, if our learners needs are being satisfied,

    what more do we need to do?

    Acknowledgements

    The author would like to thank Paul Michel of the Caledonian School

    in Prague for many of the adaptation ideas presented in this paper,

    as well as the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions for

    improvements.

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    20/22

    164 Adapting Your Course Book: Becoming Skilled

    References

    Alderson, C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge

    University Press.Bell, A. & Gower, R (1998). Writing course materials for the world:

    A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development

    in language teaching (pp. 116-129). Cambridge: Cambridge

    University Press.

    Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C. N. (1987). Which materials?: A consumers

    and designers guide. In L. E. Sheldon (Ed), ELT textbooks and

    materials: Problems in evaluation and development (pp. 13-28).

    London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.

    Bruton, A. (1997). In what ways do we want EFL coursebooks to

    differ? System, 25(2), 275-284.

    Carless, D. R. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-basedteaching in primary schools. System, 31, 485-500.

    Craven, M. (2008). Breakthrough: Success with English. Students Book

    1. Tokyo: MacMillan Language House Ltd.

    Crawford, J. (2002). The role of materials in the language classroom:

    Finding a balance. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.),

    Methodology in Language Teaching. (pp. 80-91). Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press.

    Cunningsworth A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford:

    Heinemann.

    Cunningsworth, A., & Kusel, P. (1991). Evaluating teachers guides.

    ELT Journal, 45(2), 128-139.

    Day, R. R. & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive Reading in the SecondLanguage Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    de Castell, S., Luke, A., & Luke, C. (1989). Introduction. In S. de

    Castell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and

    criticism: Readings on the school textbook (pp. 245-260). London:

    The Falmer Press.

    Dougill, J. (1987). Not so obvious. In L. E. Sheldon (Ed), ELT textbooks

    and materials: Problems in evaluation and development (pp. 29-35).

    London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.

    Gammidge, M. (2004). Speaking Extra. A Resource Book of Multi-level

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    21/22

    Tim Dalby 165

    Skills Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading

    research. TESOL Quarterly 25(3), 375-406.

    Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers.Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.

    Harmer, J. (2001). Coursebooks: A human, cultural and linguistic

    disaster? Modern English Teacher, 10(3), 5-10.

    Harwood, N. (2005). What do we want EAP teaching materials for?

    Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 149-161.

    Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom.

    Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for

    learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571

    Hunt, D. E. & Joyce, B. R. (1967). Teacher trainee personality and

    initial teaching style. American Educational Research Journal 4(3),253-259.

    Hutchinson, T. (1987). Whats underneath?: An interactive view of

    materials evaluation. In L. E. Sheldon (Ed), ELT textbooks and

    materials: Problems in evaluation and development (pp. 37-44).

    London: Modern English Publications and The British Council

    Kramsch, C. & Sullivan, P. (1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Journal

    50(3), (pp. 199-212.)

    Littlejohn, A. (1992). Why are English language teaching materials

    the way they are? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster

    University, Lancaster.

    Maley, A. (1992). An open letter to the profession. ELT Journal,

    46(1), 96-99.Maley, A. (1998). Squaring the circle reconciling materials as constraint

    with materials as empowerment. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials

    development in language teaching (pp. 279-294). Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press.

    McCarthy, M. McCarten, J. & Sandiford, H. (2005). Touchstone Students

    Book 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design,

    procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 219-240.

    Richards, J. C. (1993). Beyond the textbook: The role of commercial

  • 8/10/2019 7. Tim Dalby

    22/22