Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pa
Qp
Qp
Qp
Ag
Ag
Ag
Qp
Qp
Qp
Qp
Ac
Ac
Ag
Qp
Ac
St
Ag
Sa
Sa
Sa
Sa
Sa
ME
ME
ME
PcC
MlMl
Ml
AgR
AgR
PcC
Ls
PcC
PcC
PcC
Ls
Gt
Rs Rs
Ac
Ac
Qp
Qp
Qp
Ml
Ml
Ml
AgR
AgR
Gt
Jr
St
Ml
Gt#
Gt#
Gt#
Gt#
Gt#
Gt#
Mb#
Mb#
Mb#
Mb#
Rs
SaSS
RB
CsF
CsF
CsMF
CsF
CsF
Ef
HO
HAGRo
Ro
Ro
HAG
CsMFHRE
HRE
HRE
HREME
ME
ME PMQ
PMQ
PMQ
HAG
HAG
HRE
Ro
Ro
PMQ
SjR Sh
Ea
SjR
Sh
Me
Lf
Lf
Lf
SjR
SjR
Ea
Ea
SjR
Lp
HRE
HRE
PBB
PBB
Ctr
CtrCtrCtr
Ctr
Ctr
Ro Ro
Ro Ro
Ro
PlOL
PlOL
CtA
CtA
CtA
Ctr
CtA
PBB
PBB
PBB
Ctr
Ef
Hr
Hr
Hr
Hr
CsMF
CsMF
CsMF
Ef
Ef
Ef
Hr
Lf
Lf
BSBS
HrPMQ
Lf
HAG
HO
HH
Ro
Ea
Lf
Ea
Ro
Ro
LaH
Ro
Ro
LaH
LaH
Lf
Ro
LaH
SoP
SoP
Hr
Hr
Sh
Ea
Lf
Hr
Lf
SoPBS
SoP BS
Lp
Ef
Ef
Ef
HAG
HAG
HAG
HAG
Ctr
Ro
Ctr
Ro
Ctr
Ro Ro
CtA
CtA
EfEf
PMQ
PMQ
PMQHAG
HAG
HAG
HAG CtA
CtA
RB
RB
HO
HO
HO
HO
HO
HRE
HO
HRE
CtA
HH
CtA
HH
CtA
CtA
HHe
LaH
CtA
CtA
Dt SoPHr
Dt
Ef
HAG
Lp
Lf
Ea
EaLf
SjR
Sh
SjR
Lf
Sh
Me
Me
SjR
HH
SoP
HH
HH
HHPMQ
PMQ
PMQ
HH
PMQ
Dt
Dt
DtDt
Dt
BS
BS
BS
Ef
HAGHAG
HAG
HAGPBB
PBB
Ro
Ro
Lp
Lp
HH
HHe
HH
Dt
Ro
Dt
Ro
CsMF
HH
LaH
BS
BS
LaH
Ef
PlOLPBB
PBB
LaHLaH
CsFCsMF
PBB
PBB
Ro
RoLaH
SoPHAG
Ef
SoP
HAG
HAG
EfSoP
HAG
LpLp
CtA
Lp
CtA
HAG
HAG
SoP
Hr
SoPHr
Hr
Hr
PMQ
PMQBS
PMQ
PMQ
SoPSoP
Hr
Hr
PMQPMQ
BS
BS
HO HO
HO
HO HOHO
HO
HH
HH HHHH
HHHHPBB
Hr
Hr
Ef
RoRo HAG
HAG
CsMF
CsF
DtDt
Dt Dt
RB
DtHAG
CsMF
LaHPlOL
LaH
LaH
LaH
RB
PBB
PBB
PBB
PBB
PBB
PBB
CtACtA
CtA
CtA
CtA
CtA
PBB
PBB
HRE
HHe
HHe
HHe
CtAEf
CsMF
Gt#
Gt#
Gt#
Gt#
K
2 Bed House(4.2.1)
op
2 Bed House(4.2.1)
op
2 Bed House(4.2.1)
as2 Bed House
(4.2.1)as
P
P
Ruffordop
PP
Ruffordop
Moseleyas
Mordenas
MordenopMordenop
1 BedApartment(2.1.2)as
GreyfriarsC2op
GreyfriarsC1as
1 BedApartment(2.1.2)op
Hanbury op
Greyfriars C1 as
Greyfriars C1 as
Greyfriars C1 op
Hanbury as
Hanbury opGreyfriars C2 asGreyfriars C2 op
GreyfriarsC1as
GreyfriarsC2as
Refuse & RecycleStore
P
P
PP
PP
PP
PP
P
Refu
se &
Rec
ycle
Stor
e
PP
PP
P
PP
P
P
P
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
P
PP
Stud
io2
Bed
Apar
tmen
ts
PP
P
P
Refuse & Recycle Store
Refu
se &
Rec
ycle
Stor
ePP
PP
P
PP
PP
P
GreyfriarsC2op
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
PP
PP
P
L.E.A
.P
400Sq.M
P
P
P
P
2 Bed House(4.2.1) op
2 Bed House(4.2.1) op
P
P
P
P
P
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
P
PP
PP
PP
P
P
P
P
PP
PP
PP
2 Bed House(4.2.1) as
2 Bed House(4.2.1) as
SG
P
P
PP
P
P
PP
P
PP
193
194
195
196
197
227228
229
242243
250
249
248
247
246
245
244
251
252
253
254
255
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297298
299300
301302
303
304305
306307
308
310
311
313
314
315
316
320
322324
325
326
327
328
329
309
PP
PP
P
6.5MSharedSurface
6.5MSharedSurface
6.5
MS
hare
dS
urface
6.5
MS
hare
dS
urface
Morden opMorden as
Mord
enop
Mord
enas
Mord
enop
Mord
enas
Mord
enas
Bick
leigh
op
Bick
leigh
as
AlnwickopAlnwickas w
P
P
Ruffordop
P
P
Ruffordas
P
P
Ruffordas
Hanburyas
Hanburyop
BickleighasBickleighop
Hanburyas
Hanburyop
P
P
Ruffordop
P
P
Ruffordas
Morden opMorden as
Morden opMorden as
GreyfriarsC2
asGreyfriars
C2op
Mordenas
MordenopMordenop
BickleighasBickleighop
Moseleyas
MoseleyopMoseleyas
P
P
Ruffordas
Chedworthas
P
P
P
P
Clayton Corneras
Hatfieldop
PP
Ruffordop
PP
Ruffordas
PP
Ruffordas
220
218
217
258257
272-283208-216
P
P
Ruffordop
PP
PP
Alnwickop
Alnwickas
w
P
P
Ruffordas
312
P
P
P
PP
V
P
P
P
P
PP
2 Bed House(4.2.1) as
2 Bed House(4.2.1) op
P
VPP
PV
PP
V
PP
PP
P
P
317
319
PP323
Futu
re
Housin
g
Morden
Bins
185-188
Bins
310-312
Bins
304-306
Bins
332-336
SHED
SHED
SHED
SHEDSHED
SHED
SHED
SHED
SHED
SHEDSHED
SHED
A
A
KK
AA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
D
A
A
A
C
C
A
A
A
C
AA
A
AA
A
AA
AA
AA
D
A
A
AA
AA
A
A
A
A
A
AA
AA
A
A
AA
DD
DD
D
SU
DS
Atte
nuation
Basin
SHED
259
KK
K
260-265
266-271
223
222
221
KK
K
D
219
P
PPK
K
Gre
en
Square
199-207K
198
Moseleyop
Moseleyas
PP
PP
PP
C
C
P
P
Ruffordop
GreyfriarsC2
asGreyfriars
C2op
PP
PP
Alnwickop
Alnwickas
w
318
321
P
P
A
A
A
A
C
C
A
2 Bed House(4.2.1) op
2 Bed House(4.2.1) op
2 Bed House(4.2.1) as
AA
A
A
DD
P
P
P
PP
P
Refuse & RecycleStore
Knightsbridgeas
Knightsbridge
op
Bondas
Knightsbridgeas
Knightsbridgeas
G1
G1
Mayfair as
G1
Marylebone op
G1
Knightsbridgeop
G1
Oxford as
PP
G1
P
P
Oxford
op
G1
Holborn
op
Harleyas
PP
Knightsbridgeas
Holborn op
Holborn as
Bond op
DG
Garage
op
SG
P
P
SG
P
P
SG
P
P
SG
P
P
SG
P
P
Garag
e
op
Garage as
DG
SG
P
P
Garageas
Garageas
SG
P
P
Garage as
SG
P
P
Garage as
Garage
op
BondasGarage
op
Garageop
P
P
P
P
76
75
74
73
72
71
70
53
50
51
52
54
55
56
57 58
59
60
6162
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
49
P
P
P
P
PP
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
PP
P
P
P
Maryleboneas
Mayfairas
Mayfair as
6.5
MS
hare
dS
urf
ace
6.5MSharedSurface
Mayfairop
Mary
lebon
eas
Strandop
P
P
Strandop
PP
Strandas
PP
Mayfairop
PP
Mayfair
op
P
P
Pum
p
Sta
tion
SU
DS
Dete
ntion
Basin
A4119 Llantrisant Road
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G G
G
G
G
G
G
G1E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
P
P
P
P
P
P
SU
DS
Atte
nuation
Tank
Mayfairop
DG
DG
E E
G
Mordenop
Mord
enas
Clay
ton
Corn
erop
Hanbury as
Hanbury op
Grey
friar
sC1 as
Grey
friar
sC2 op
Grey
friar
sC2 as
P
PP
PP
P
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
P
1 Be
dAp
artm
ent
(2.1
.2)
as
Hatfieldop
P
P
129128
122
123
124
125
126
127
83
82
81
80
79
Hatfield
asP
P
P
P
P
84-89
108
109
1076.5
MS
hare
dS
urf
ace
6.5
MS
hare
dS
urf
ace
Chedworth
P
PP
PP
PP
P
P
Grey
friar
sC2 op
77
78
Clayton Corner
as
P
SG
P
P
P
PP
P
PP
P
PP
PP
P
PP
PP
P
P
P P
47
4546
97 99 101
102
103
104
105
106
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
110
112
113
114
SG
P
P
Mord
enop
Mord
enop
Mord
enas
Mord
enas
Clayton Cornerop
Chedworth
op
P
P
P
Mordenop
Mordenas
Mordenop
Mordenas
Mordenas
GreyfriarsC2as
GreyfriarsC2op
Mord
enop
Mord
enop
Mord
enop
P
P
Roseber
ry
op
P
P
Roseber
ry
op
Clay
ton
Corn
eras
P
111
P P
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AA
C
C
CD
D
D
D
DD
A
DD
H
H
H
H
H
H
SU
DS
Atte
nuation
Tank
SU
DS
Atte
nuation
Tank
SU
DS
Atte
nuation
Tank
SU
DS
Atte
nuation
Tank
SU
DS
Dete
ntion
Basin
Mord
enop A
Mordenop
A
Clayton Cornerop
Hatfieldop
D
C
Alnwickop
Alnwickas
w
D
PP
PP
P
96
98
PP
P
P
P P
100
Alnwick asAlnwick
T
ARAFSLOW
L
L
T
L
L
ARAFSLOW
TT
T
T
PMQ
Ea
Lf
Lf
Lf
Ea
HAG
HAG
HAG
PBB
Rs
Rs
Lp
Lp
Jr
Stud
io2
Bed
Apar
tmen
tsSt
udio
2 Be
d Ap
artm
ents
CsMF CsMF
Lf
Lf
Ea
Lf
CsMF HAG
Mb#
Mb#
Mb#
CsF
Ea
LaH
Ro
Ro
LaH
MeSh
Sh
Me
Lf
Lf
CsMF
HAGCtA
CtA
HAG
HAG
HO
Me
SjR
SjR
PBB
PROPOSED NATIVE TREE PLANTING(Refer to schedule for species)
SOFT LANDSCAPE KEY
PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING(Refer to schedule for species)
PROPOSED SHRUB PLANTING(Refer to schedule for species/densities)
PROPOSED GRASS SEEDING(Areas to be seeded with British Seed House Landscape Mix A19: All PurposeLandscaping, or similar approved)
PROPOSED WILDFLOWER AREAS 1(Seed mix to be Emorsgate EW1 Woodland Mixture)
PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL/AMENITY HEDGEROWS(Refer to schedule for species/densities)
PROPOSED GRASS TURF(Areas to be turfed with Rowlawn Medalion, or similar approved)
PROPOSED WILDFLOWER AREAS 2(Seed mix to be Emorsgate EH1 Hedgerow Mixture)
PROPOSED NATIVE HEDGEROWS(Refer to schedule for species/densities)
PROPOSED UNDERSTOREY PLANTING(Refer to schedule for species / densities)
Hebe 'Autumn Glory'
LaH Lavandula angustifolia 'Hidcote' 30 - 40 (h)4 sqm
HAG
Lonicera pileata 30 - 40 (h)4 sqmLp
RB Rhododendron bloombux 30 - 40 (h)
4 sqm
Sh Sarcococca hookeriana var. digyna 30 - 40 (h)4 sqm
Ho Heuchera 'Obsidian' 30 - 40 (h)5 sqm
4 sqm
Hebe Red Edge 30 - 40 (h)5 sqmHRE
ABBRV SPECIES DENSITY ROOT COND.HEIGHT/GIRTH TOTALPOT SIZE
2-3L2-3L
2-3L
2-3L
2-3L
2-3L
PLANT SCHEDULE
SHRUB PLANTING
Ea
PBB
PlOL
Phormium Bronze Baby
Prunus laurocerasus 'Otto Luyken'
Euphorbia amygdaloides var. robbiae 2-3L
2-3L
2-3L
CON
30 - 40 (h)
30 - 40 (h)
30 - 40 (h)4 sqm
4 sqm
30 - 40 (h) 2-3L
4 sqm
4 sqm
Ef Euonymus fortunei 'Emerald Gaiety' 2-3L40 - 60 (h)4 sqm
2-3L
2-3L
PfE Potentilla fruticosa 'Elizabeth' 30 - 40 (h)
Hebe rakaiensis 30 - 40 (h)4 sqmHr
Betula pubescensBp
ABBRV SPECIES DENSITY ROOT COND.HEIGHT/GIRTH TOTALPOT SIZE
NATIVE TREE PLANTING
Ac Acer campestre
AS SHOWN
Ag Alnus glutinosa
Gt Gleditsia triaca. Dravers Street Keeper
Malus 'Evereste'ME
ABBRV SPECIES DENSITY ROOT COND.HEIGHT/GIRTH TOTALPOT SIZE
ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING
AcS Acer campestre Streetwise
AS SHOWN
Pyrus calleryana ChanticleerPcC
Prunus Sunset BoulevardPSB
Sorbus aucuparia 'Sheerwater Seed'SaSS
Tilia cordata RanchoTcR
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
10 - 12 (g)
12 - 14 (g)
12 - 14 (g)
12 - 14 (g)
12 - 14 (g)
12 - 14 (g)
12 - 14 (g)
ROOTBALLED
Crataegus monogynaCm
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
ROOTBALLED
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
CON
10 - 12 (g)
10 - 12 (g)
10 - 12 (g)
10 - 12 (g)
DENSITY
NATIVE HEDGEROW PLANTINGSPP. & PERCENTAGE IN MIXABBRV ROOT COND.HEIGHT/GIRTH POT SIZE TOTAL
AS KEY
5 per lin/m -
40 - 60 (h) ROOT CELL -
-Corylus avellana (30%)
Crataegus monogyna (30%)
Ilex aquifolium (10%)
ROOT CELL
ROOT CELL
40 - 60 (h)
40 - 60 (h)
(Hedgerows to be planted as double staggered rows 500mm apart)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AgR Amelanchier grandiflora 'Robin Hill' --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -
Crataegus Pauls ScarletCPS --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -
Ls Liquidambar styra. Slender 'Silhouette' --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -
Malus baccata 'Street Parade'Mb --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -Ml Magnolia loebneri 'leonard messel' --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -
Sorbus aucuparia 'Streetwise'Sa --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -Robinia slavinii 'Hillieri'Rs --200-250 (h) ROOTBALLED -
--Juglans regiaJr ROOTBALLED10 - 12 (g) -
--Prunus aviumPa ROOTBALLED10 - 12 (g) -
-Prunus spinosa (10%) ROOT CELL40 - 60 (h) -
40 - 60 (h) ROOT CELL -Acer campestre (10%) -
-Rosa canina (5%) ROOT CELL40 - 60 (h) -
-Viburnum opulus (5%) ROOT CELL40 - 60 (h) -
DENSITY
ORNAMENTAL HEDGEROW PLANTINGSPP. & PERCENTAGE IN MIXABBRV ROOT COND.HEIGHT/GIRTH POT SIZE TOTAL
EAB5 per lin/m
40 - 60 (h) ROOT CELL -Escallonia Donard Seedling
(Hedgerows to be planted as double staggered rows 500mm apart)
-
40 - 60 (h) ROOT CELL -Escallonia Apple Blossom -
EDS
ABBRV SPECIES DENSITY ROOT COND.HEIGHT/GIRTH TOTALPOT SIZE
NATIVE UNDERSTOREY
Crataegus monogyna (50%) --BR60 - 80 (h)AS KEY
Corylus avellana (50%) --60 - 80 (h)1 sqm
BR
-
-
--Quercus petraeaQp ROOTBALLED10 - 12 (g) -
EXISTING WOODLAND / VEGETATION TO BE RETAINED
EXISTING HEDGEROW (CENTRE LINE) TO BE RETAINED(Any gaps / thin spots to be infilled with new native planting. Refer toschedule for species / densities)
--Sorbus terminalisSt ROOTBALLED10 - 12 (g) -
Trees marked with # to be planted in accordance with TDA.2332.03. All othertrees to be planted in accordance with TDA.2332.04
Ctr Ceanothus thyrsiflorus repens 2-3LCON30 - 40 (h)4 sqm -CtA Choisya ternata Apple Blossom 2-3LCON30 - 40 (h)4 sqm -CsMF Cornus sanguinea 'Midwinter Fire' 2-3LCON40 - 60 (h)3 sqm -CsF Cornus sericea 'Flaviramea' 2-3LCON40 - 60 (h)3 sqm -BS Brachyglottis Sunshine 2-3LCON30 - 40 (h)4 sqm -
Dt Daphne tangautica 2-3LCON30 - 40 (h)4 sqm -
HHe Hebe Heartbreaker 30 - 40 (h)5 sqm 2-3LCON -HH Hypericum × hidcoteense 'Hidcote' 30 - 40 (h)4 sqm 2-3LCON -
Lf Leucothoe fontanesiana whitewater 30 - 40 (h)4 sqm 2-3LCON -
Mahonia eurybracteata 'Soft Caress' 30 - 40 (h)3 sqmMe 2-3LCON -
SjR Skimmia japonica 'Rubella' 30 - 40 (h)4 sqm 2-3LCON -
SoP Salvia officinalis Purpurascens 30 - 40 (h)5 sqm 2-3LCON -
Ro Rosmarinus officinalis 40 - 60 (h)4 sqm 2-3LCON -
PROPOSED WILDFLOWER AREAS 3(Seed mix to be Emorsgate EM8 Wetland Mixture)
SCALEDRAWING NUMBER
DATE
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWN
CLIENT
NOV 2017
1:500 @ A0
RHC/AMP
TDA.2332.02 SHEET 3
DETAILED SOFT LANDSCAPE PROPOSALS
LAND AT J33, CARDIFF
PERSIMMON HOMES EAST WALES
TDATHE GRANARYNEWLAND FAWR FARMLLANGANCF35 5DRTEL: 01446 789367
Zelkova serrata Green VaseZs --12 - 14 (g) ROOTBALLED -
A 17.01.18Additional tree planting added AMP
Appendix II
Appendix III
Reptile Mitigation Strategy
The Parish
Junction 33 Development
Cardiff
Phases 1 and 2 and
Section 278 Works Llantrisant Road
For Persimmon Homes
June 2015
TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 2
Survey Undertaken By:
Carmen Jones MSc MIEEM and Dyfrig Jones BSc
Report Written By:
Carmen Jones
Report Verified By:
Dyfrig Jones
Copyright TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd. All rights reserved. Ownership of the report remains with TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd until payment has been received in full No part of the report may be altered or extracted without the prior written consent of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd as to the form and context in which it may appear TerrAqua Ecological Services have produced the report for the sole use of the client and no other party may use or copy (Either in part or whole) any part of the report without the written confirmation of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd. Any part of the report cannot be altered or extracted without the prior written consent of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd as to the form and context in which it may appear. TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd accepts no responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party.
TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd Company Registration Number 8053420
W Wales Office
Swyn yr Awel, Bwlch y Groes,
Llandysul Ceredigion SA44 5JX
[email protected] Mobile 07951023358
SE Wales Office
36 Somerset Road East Barry Vale of Glamorgan CF63 1BE 01446 748052 [email protected] Mobile 07742149344
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 3
Contents Page
1 Introduction Page 4 1.1 Project Introduction Page 4 1.2 Current Reptile Status Page 4 1.3 Proposed Strategy Introduction Page 5 1.4 Site Description Page 6 1.5 Proposed Works Page 6 2 Development Mitigation Proposals Page 7 2.1 Introduction Page 7 2.2 Pre Translocation Habitat Manipulation Page 8 2.3 Exclusion Fencing Page 8 2.4 Artificial Refuga Page 9 2.5 Trapping Page 9 2.6 Destructive Search Page 10 2.7 Habitat Manipulation Post Trapping Page 11 2.8 Handling Page 11 2.9 Receptor Site Page 11 2.10 Receptor Site Enhancements Page 13 3 Timetable of Works Page 13 References Page 14 List of Tables Table 1 Suitable Reptile trapping conditions Page 10 Table 2 Expected timings of reptile translocation works Page 13 Appendices Appendix I Drawing 1 Route of Exclusion Fencing and Location of Receptor Site Appendix II Proposed Reptile Exclusion Fencing specifications
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 4
1 Introduction
1.1 Project Introduction In June 2017 Mr Daryl Jones acting on behalf of Persimmon Homes commissioned TerrAqua
Ecological Services Ltd to prepare an appropriate reptile mitigation strategy for Phases I and 2
of the proposed development referred to as Junction 33 and for the associated 278 works along
Llantrisant Road.
This document has been prepared as a detailed method statement for the protection of reptiles
specifically for Phases 1 and 2 including Section 278 works, before, and during the site works,
to include methods for site clearance, identification of receptor site, and outline of post
development monitoring strategy.
The necessity for such a mitigation strategy was highlighted in Volume 1, Chapter 7, Ecology
and Nature Conservation, of the Environmental Statement for Land North of Junction 33
Cardiff (Persimmon Homes, 2014) which states that where suitable habitats for reptiles exists
“clearance works could result in injury or mortality of any reptiles present which is likely to
constitute an adverse impact within the immediate zone of influence in the absence of
mitigation”. The presence of habitats suitable for reptiles was recorded within the Phase I
Habitat Survey of the site (Soltys Brewster, 2014)
The following document provides to the local Planning Authority the proposed methodology
to be used for the clearance of reptiles from the development footprint within Phase 1 and 2
and section 278 works off Llantrisant Road.
1.2 Current Reptile Status
A Phase I Habitat Survey of the site was undertaken in 2014 by Soltys Brewster Ecology. The
results of the Phase I survey highlighted the habitats present within the site boundary including
those with the potential to support common reptile species such as slow worm and common
lizard.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 5
In September/October 2014 all suitable habitats within the application boundary were surveyed
for the presence of reptile species on behalf of Persimmon Homes by Soltys Brewster Ecology.
The results of the survey completed using standard methodologies recorded the presence of
common lizard within the site. The conclusion based on the survey results was that a small
population of common reptile species is present within the site (Soltys Brewster, 2015).
All common species of reptile are protected against killing or injury under Schedule 5 (sections
9 (1) and 9(5) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). In practice this means
that developers are expected to take all reasonable steps to ensure that reptiles are protected
from injury or death throughout the construction and development process.
1.3 Proposed Strategy Introduction
In June 2017 TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd were instructed by Persimmon Homes to
prepare a mitigation strategy, based upon the results of the above referenced reports, in order
to protect reptiles within the development site.
Natural England requires two main aims to be met when considering appropriate actions for
reptile mitigation on development sites (English Nature, 2004) and this approach is supported
by all statutory bodies including Natural Resources Wales (NRW) across the United Kingdom:
1. to protect reptiles from harm that might arise during development works
2. ensure sufficient quality and connectivity of habitat is provided to accommodate the
reptile population, either on site or at an alternative site, with no net loss of local reptile
conservation status
The mitigation proposals for the site will set out a methodology to achieve these aims. It is
proposed in this instance that reptiles will be trapped from the part of the site where
development is proposed and moved to suitable areas immediately outside the development
zone, but within the overall site boundary, and allowed to disperse naturally into adjacent
habitats. Other areas of the site will be cleared using sensitive habitat manipulation. Due to the
duration and phased approach over which the full development of the site will be undertaken
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 6
the reptile mitigation strategy for each development phase will be similarly addressed, while
following an overall approach in line with this document specifically aimed at Phases 1, 2 and
section 278 works along Llantrisant Road.
1.4 Site Description (Phase 1 and 2 and Section 278 Works) Habitats present within the areas of Phases 1 and 2 of the development including those affected
by section 278 works along Llantrisant Road include improved grassland, marshy grassland,
mature trees, defunct and intact hedgerows, scrub, watercourses, and woodland edge. A number
of these habitats provide potential refuge and feeding areas for common reptile species.
Three (3) Sites of Nature Conservation (SINCs) are present or lie adjacent to land within Phases
1 and 2 of development. All three features will be retained post development.
1.5 Proposed Works
The proposed works include the development of all land as shown in Drawing Junction 33
The Parish Reptile Fence and Receptor Area, extending over some 22 acres (8.9 Hectares).
The works also include the section 278 infrastructure works associated with highway
improvements and improved site access along Llantrisant road. This will result in the loss of
large areas of improved grassland, small areas of marshy grassland, the loss of the hedgerow
along Llantrisant road and short sections of dividing hedges, the removal of a block of conifer
trees and the removal of a number of broadleaf trees.
On completion of the phases 1 and 2 of the development some areas within domestic gardens
are likely to be suitable for use by reptiles once these have matured although these are likely to
be small in extent and be suitable for slow worm rather than larger species such as grass snake.
The green infrastructure plan encompassing the whole site and all stages of development will
ensure that on completion of the development reptile habitat will be both retained and created
with a series of green corridors allowing movement through the site and connectivity to the
wider countryside.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 7
2 Development Mitigation Proposals
2.1 Introduction
In order to protect the reptile population present on the site it is proposed that animals will be
excluded from the construction footprint and a programme of habitat manipulation, trapping
and translocation to a receptor site will be undertaken. The programme will use best practise
guidelines for reptile translocation and capture (Gent & Gibson, 1998).
The successful translocation of reptiles requires both careful planning and implementation. In
order to ensure that the mitigation proposals are effective in successfully excluding reptiles
from the site the following works will be carried out, or supervised by, an appropriately
qualified ecologist:
Selection and demarcation of proposed reptile exclusion fence lines
Searching of fence line path and removal of reptiles in these areas prior to fence
installation
Selection of exclusion fencing type and supervision of installation of reptile exclusion
fencing to appropriate specifications
Placement of artificial refuga within the construction footprint to facilitate reptile
capture
Identification of receptor site within the existing boundary of the site outside of any
area of disturbance during the construction period
Supervision of any habitat enhancements required at the selected receptor site
Trapping of reptiles and their transport to the selected receptor site
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 8
Destructive hand search of rubble piles and other habitats to facilitate the location and
trapping of reptiles
Supervision of habitat, manipulation and vegetation stripping required on site
2.2 Habitat Clearance (Pre Translocation Programme)
Prior to the installation of reptile exclusion fencing any areas of improved grassland will be
assessed and where necessary will be cut using to encourage reptiles into the peripheral habitats
for ease of capture. The need for such pre-translocation manipulation will be undertaken in
locations where the ecologist has made a decision that such works will be of assistance in the
clearance of the site of reptiles. Where such manipulation of habit is required each individual
field will be cut from the centre outwards effectively encouraging reptiles (and small mammals)
towards the periphery. The direction of pre translocation habitat manipulation is shown in
drawing appendix 1.
2.3 Fencing Reptile exclusion fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the vegetated areas of the
construction footprint, as shown in Drawing 1 Reptile Fence and Receptor Area (Appendix I),
in order to assist in the translocation of reptiles, ensure that no reptiles can re-enter the working
footprint following the translocation and provide a clear demarcation of the working area.
The minimum specification and type of reptile fencing to be used is shown in (Appendix II).
However following consultation with the developer the exact specification and route of the
fencing may be amended in order to allow the fence to be effectively installed. This will depend
on factors such as the need to protect tree roots and respect tree root protection zones, length
of time the fencing will remain in place, the potential for vandalism and to ensure the integrity
of the fence can be maintained and to allow access to working areas. This will allow the
appropriate standard of fencing to be installed and remain reptile proof throughout the
construction period.
Prior to installation of the exclusion fencing, the path of the fence line will be searched and
vegetation removed to ensure no reptiles are harmed during the installation.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 9
The fencing will be installed by a contractor with experience in reptile exclusion fencing
installation. An ecologist will be on site during the installation process.
The fencing will be checked daily throughout the trapping and relocation programme, and
during the construction phase, in order to ensure the fencing remains in good condition and
reptiles do not find their way back onto the development site.
The fencing will be removed on completion of the development. Some realignment of the
reptile fence may periodically be required in order to facilitate the installation of drains and
other infrastructure. Any such movement of the fence will be completed only after consultation
with the ecologist. All peripheral fencing along retained hedgerows, woodlands and other
habitats will be retained in situ throughout the development.
2.4 Artificial Refuga Artificial refuga will be used as a tool to trap reptiles for relocation away from the construction
footprint. Each refuga will consist of a 500mm x 500mm square of roofing felt. A minimum of
100 artificial refuga per Hectare will be placed around the site (phases 1 and 2 and Section 278
works). These will be positioned within areas of habitat considered most suitable for use by
basking reptiles. The number of refuga used will be amended if capture rates are higher than
anticipated to ensure the maximum numbers of animals as possible are moved from potential
harm and the translocation merits increased trapping effort.
Habitat manipulation is a recognised methodology by which reptiles can be encouraged to
congregate in specific areas, thereby facilitating their effective capture. Specific blocks of
vegetation will be strimmed when capture rates in these areas drop to zero. This will result in
these strimmed areas becoming unsuitable for reptiles, and encourage the reptiles to congregate
beneath refuga within the remaining islands of vegetation for ease of capture.
2.5 Trapping
The effectiveness of reptile trapping can be greatly influenced by survey timing and weather
conditions. It is intended that trapping will ideally be carried out during the mid to late summer
period (July -October) under suitable weather conditions and will be suspended should weather
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 10
conditions deteriorate significantly within the proposed trapping period, either through the
arrival of cold and wet conditions or exceptionally warm days. The precise months for the
translocation may be subject to change for operational reasons but in all circumstances
translocation will only take place during suitable weather conditions when reptiles are active
and attracted to artificial refuga. Suitable conditions for reptile trapping are given in table 1.
Table 1 Suitable Reptile trapping conditions
Temperature range 9º - 18ºC
Sunny-bright Suitable
Cloudy Suitable
Wind strength Low-calm
It is proposed that the trapping period will extend over a period of thirty days. In the event that
no reptile species are caught within the first fifteen days of the programme trapping will cease.
If reptiles are caught within this period then trapping will continue for the full 30 days. If no
reptiles are recorded for five consecutive days and weather conditions have remained suitable
throughout this period then it will be assumed that the site is clear and trapping will cease. In
order to ensure that the site has been effectively cleared trapping will continue for five days
after a nil result even if this extends beyond the initial planned thirty days of trapping.
2.6 Destructive Search After five days of negative returns any potential reptile habitat remaining, such as rough grass,
debris piles, and scrub will be subject to a destructive search, in order to ensure no reptiles
remain concealed in these areas. This will involve the careful destruction of such areas and the
capture of any reptiles found. Similarly hedgerows and mature trees requiring removal as part
of Phases 1 and 2 and the hedgerow along Llantrisant Road to be removed as part of the Section
278 works will be searched by an ecologist during removal. Any animals found will be
translocated to the agreed receptor area. The search will be directly supervised by the ecologist.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 11
2.7 Habitat Manipulation Habitat manipulation will be used to discourage reptiles from specific areas prior to the
translocation as described in 2.2. The technique will also be used to ensure that all areas within
the immediate construction footprint are made unsuitable for reptiles following completion of
the translocation programme.
Specific areas of vegetation will be cut to encourage reptiles to move to selected areas to
enhance the effectiveness of the trapping. The vegetation will be cut from the centre of the site
encouraging reptiles to move to the periphery.
After the translocation programme is completed and following any necessary destructive
searches the first 115mm of soil and vegetation will be scrapped from the vegetated areas of
the site where construction is planned. Any reptiles located during this procedure will be
captured for relocation. The works will be overseen by the ecologist.
2.8 Handling
All reptiles caught will be placed in a suitable secure container for transport to the release site.
Each container will be allow air to circulate to prevent overheating and will contain a layer of
vegetation to provide cover. Different species of reptile will be transported in separate
containers. All containers will be labelled and show the species of animals held in each. All
animals will be immediately released on the day of capture at the selected receptor site.
The total number of animals caught per day, including species, sex and location of capture will
be recorded. This will permit the decline in capture rates to be observed, and for decisions as
to areas suitable for habitat manipulation to be
2.9 Receptor Site
A requirement of any translocation programme is to ensure that the receptor site provides
sufficient quantity and quality of habitat to accommodate the population of animals being
moved. The reptile survey report (Soltys Brewster, 2014) concluded that a small population of
common reptile species is present within the site boundary. The retention of reptile habitat
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 12
within the main development zones of Phases 1 and 2 and the road improvement works along
Llantrisant road is impractical due to the extent of required earthworks and other operations.
As a result reptiles will require moving to a suitable safe undisturbed area within the overall
site boundary but outside any working areas.
Reptiles often favour the habitats present along operational and disused railway lines. The
embankments, scrub, woodland and open areas of old ballast associated with such features
afford good habitats for foraging, basking and hibernating reptiles.
It is proposed that for Phases 1 and 2 of the development and for the section 278 improvement
works the receptor area for reptiles will be the Cadoxton and Trehafod old railway line SINC
(Appendix I). Specifically the northern section of the line, separating two area of improved
grassland. This area will remain undisturbed and retained throughout the development woks.
The disused line will also form part of the main green infrastructure retained and enhanced to
provide green linkages within the completed development and retain/enhance connectivity with
the surrounding countryside. Other sections of the line will also be used for translocations
required within other phases of the development where such a need arises.
Reptile surveys completed in 2014 recorded a small number (single common lizard) within the
site. No significant numbers of reptiles were found on the discussed railway line. It can
therefore be concluded that the extent of suitable habit along the line does have the capacity to
support the small numbers of reptiles expected to require translocation from Phases 1 and 2.
It is intended that animals captured will be released within the mosaic of habitats and allowed
to disperse naturally into surrounding habitats located within the immediate vicinity. The
retention of the animals within relatively close proximity to their initial habitat should allow
for re-colonisation of the development site including new domestic gardens once works have
been completed. The translocation of animals to a location within the overall development
boundary will also increase the probability that the moved animals will survive, retain genetic
integrity and eliminate the possibility of the spread of disease.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 13
2.10 Receptor Site Habitat Enhancements and Management The proposed receptor site has direct links to the extensive habitats provided by the extensive
scrub, woodland, and rough grassland associated with the railway line. It is therefore
considered unnecessary for any habitat enhancements to be made within the release site prior
to the movement of animals to these areas. Enhancements may be required for any further
translocations at commencement of further development phases and these will need to be
considered as the development progresses.
3 Timetable of Works The expected timetable for the reptile exclusion works is given below. The timetable is based
upon the assumption that the programme will be carried out during the late summer early
autumn 2017. The timings are indicative and subject to change, depending on commencement
of works and operational factors, however, the order or duration of the works should not change
significantly. All trapping will be completed under appropriate weather conditions.
Table 2 Expected timings of reptile translocation works
Task July/August August/September September October Installation of
reptile fencing
Trapping and
translocation
* **
Habitat
manipulation
** **
Destructive search ** ** Release of site for
development
** ** **
Removal of reptile
fencing
Following development completion
* Dependent upon weather conditions ** Dependent upon number of reptiles caught determining length of trapping period
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 14
References
JNCC, (1998). Species Action Plans. UK BAP, English Nature, JNCC Froglife, (1999). Reptile survey: an introduction to planning, conducting and interpreting surveys for snake and lizard conservation. Froglife advice sheet 10. Froglife. Halesworth Gent, T. & Gibson, S. (1999). Hereptofauna workers manual. Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Persimmon Homes (2014) Land North of Junction 33, Cardiff – Environmental Statement.
Soltys Brewster Ecology (2013) Land North of M4 Junction 33, Cardiff – Extended Phase 1
Habitat Survey.
Soltytys Brewster (2014) Land North of Junction 33 Reptile Survey Report.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 REPTILE MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 15
Appendix I
Map showing location of Reptile Exclusion Fencing,
Habitat Manipulation and Reptile Receptor Area
Appendix II
Appendix IV
The Parish
Junction 33 Development
Cardiff
Phases 1 and 2 and
Section 278 Works Llantrisant Road
Proposed Precautionary Method of
Working with Regard to Dormouse, and
Nesting Birds
On Behalf of Persimmon Homes (East Wales)
June 2017
TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 2
Document History
Carmen Jones MSc MCIEEM and Dyfrig Jones BSc
Report Written By:
Carmen Jones
Report Verified By:
Dyfrig Jones
Copyright TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd. All rights reserved. Ownership of the report remains with TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd until payment has been received in full No part of the report may be altered or extracted without the prior written consent of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd as to the form and context in which it may appear TerrAqua Ecological Services have produced the report for the sole use of the client and no other party may use or copy (Either in part or whole) any part of the report without the written confirmation of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd. Any part of the report cannot be altered or extracted without the prior written consent of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd as to the form and context in which it may appear. TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd accepts no responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party.
W Wales Office
Swyn yr Awel, Bwlch y Groes,
Llandysul Ceredigion SA44 5JX
[email protected] Mobile 07951023358
SE Wales Office
36 Somerset Road East Barry Vale of Glamorgan CF63 1BE 01446 748052 [email protected] Mobile 07742149344
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 3
Contents Page
1 Introduction Page 4
1.1 Background and Rationale Page 4
1.2 European Protected Species (Dormouse) Page 5
2 Precautionary Method of Working Page 5
3 Precautionary Method of Working (Nesting Birds) Page 8
Appendix I Drawing TQ: S278:P1 V1 Showing Extent of Works and Direction of Hedgerow/Tree Removal
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 4
1 Introduction TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd have been commissioned by Persimmon Homes (East
Wales) to produce a precautionary method of working for the removal of a length of hedgerow
and scrub bordering Llantrisant Road and the removal of other hedgerow sections within the
boundary of the development land referred to as The Parish, Junction 33. The precautionary
method of working relates specifically to the Section 278 access and road improvement works
along Llantrisant Road and the works required within Phases 1 and 2 of the development. The
precautionary method of working relates to the potential impact of such works on Dormouse,
and Nesting Birds.
1.1 Background and Rationale
Outline Planning Permission has been granted by Cardiff Council to Persimmon Homes East
Wales for the development of a new housing development on land north of M4 Junction 33
extending to the boundary with Llantrisant Road. The development will be competed in a
number of phases extending over a period of several years, with phases 1 and 2 due to
commence in summer 2017.
The construction of the development will result in significant changes to the landscapes and
habitats within the boundaries of the site. These changes will include the removal and
translocation of some hedgerows, the permanent total/partial loss of some hedges and the
replanting of new hedgerows, woodlands and areas of scrub.
Extensive surveys of the hedgerow system for evidence of the use of the site by Dormice have
been undertaken as part of the full ecological assessment of the site required as part of the
planning process (Soltys Brewster, 2013). The survey was a comprehensive survey of the site
using a nest tube methodology and extended from April 2013 to November 2013 inclusive.
The survey also included a search of hazel nuts for the characteristic field signs left by feeding
dormice. Neither the nest tube survey or nut search resulted in any evidence of a dormouse
presence within the site boundary.
Historic surveys (ELW, 2007) have resulted in some limited evidence of occasional dormouse
presence in the form of four nuts opened by dormouse. Based on the most recent survey results
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 5
and the historical data it was concluded that this species is likely to be absent from the site,
however their continued presence in the surrounding area or movement through the site on an
occasional/ irregular basis could not be ruled out (Soltys Brewster, 2015).
The absence of dormouse from the site means that any hedgerow works are unlikely to have
an impact on the favourable conservation status of dormice within the site or at a local/national
level and therefore no EPS licence is required for the hedgerow works. However as it has been
acknowledged that there is a possibility, however small, that dormice may occasionally use the
hedgerows as commuting routes between favoured areas it is considered necessary that a
precautionary approach is taken on all works with any potential to impact on dormouse or
potential dormouse habitat. For this reason the following Precautionary Method of Working
(PMW) has been produced in order to ensure that no dormouse are disturbed or harmed as a
result of the proposed works and that all individuals working on these are aware of the
appropriate course of action in the unlikely event that dormice, or dormouse nests, are
observed.
The precautionary method of working is complimentary to the detailed overall green
infrastructure strategy designed to ensure the retention of green corridors throughout and
around the site once all phases of the development are completed.
1.2 European Protected Species (Dormouse)
Dormouse are fully protected as a European Protected Species under the Conservation of
Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) and are afforded protection under the
1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act (as amended). Persimmon Homes fully understand their
legal responsibilities with regard to protected species and accept that should any evidence of
dormouse activity be observed during any part of the works then works must cease and an
appropriate EPS licence obtained from Natural Resources Wales before the works
recommence.
Allowing for the precautions and appropriate method of working as described in Section 2 of
this document and taking into account the results of survey work specifically designed to
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 6
identify a dormouse presence it considered reasonably unlikely that the works will result in
deliberate capture, injury, or killing of Dormouse or damage to a place of rest.
Similarly it is considered reasonably unlikely that the proposed methodology for the removal
of the hedgerow section will result in deliberate disturbance to Dormouse in such a way as
to likely impair their ability to survive, breed, reproduce, rear or nurture their young,
hibernate or migrate; or to significantly affect the local distribution or abundance of
dormouse within the site boundary or affect the Conservation Status of Dormouse.
2 Hedgerow/Scrub and Tree Removal Precautionary Method of Working
In order to ensure that no dormouse are harmed during the clearance of hedgerows to be lost
or removed for translocation or removal of scrub and trees the following precautionary
methodology will be applied:
Where hedgerow and scrub clearance is required, either for removal or translocation, it will be
supervised by a suitably experienced and licensed dormouse ecologist and undertaken in
accordance with methods outlined in the Dormouse Conservation Handbook (Bright et al,
English Nature 2006) to minimise risks to any dormice that might be present.
All aspects of vegetation clearance including hedgerow coppicing, removal and translocation
will be supervised by an experienced and licenced ecologist.
Due to operational reasons and the urgency of the need to access various sections of the
development area the cutting, removal and translocation of the hedgerows will be undertaken
in autumn 2017 with no intermittent (seasonal) period between coppicing and removal.
No hedgerow or section of hedgerow will be left isolated during the programme of removal
and translocation of hedgerows. This will ensure that there is no fragmentation of potential
dormouse habitat and dispersal corridors are retained both within the development site and
between the site and the wider countryside.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 7
The works to remove and/or translocate individual hedgerows/vegetation will be undertaken in
a systematic manner and progress in a direction which encourages dormice (and other small
mammals) to move towards retained suitable habitat. A maximum of 100m of given
hedgerow/vegetation will be coppiced on any day. The staggered approach to coppicing will
allow any dormouse present to move away from the disturbance and allow overnight
opportunities for dispersal to other habitats.
A search of both above ground vegetation and ground layers will be undertaken by a licenced
ecologist immediately prior to the above ground clearance to check for the presence of
dormouse or dormouse nests. Immediately following completion of the ecologists search and
confirmation that it is safe to proceed the above ground vegetation will be systematically cut
and removed. The works will commence at the centre of the Llantrisant road section and works
will proceed in opposite directions east and west of this point. At the Junction with the
hedgerow and group of trees to be removed running north south off Llantrisant road cutting
and clearance will continue in a southerly direction. Details of the direction of cutting are
shown in Drawing TQ:S278:P1 V1 Llantrisant Road S 278 Works Hedgerow and Habitat
Removal Plan no more than five metres at a time with checks made to each preceding 5m prior
to cutting. This will ensure that in the unlikely event that dormouse are disturbed they can
freely move along the adjacent vegetation to undisturbed locations to the east and west.
However should dormouse be actually observed or dormouse nests found (All nests occupied
or otherwise) then works will cease and will not continue until an appropriate licence has been
obtained for the disturbance of dormouse and resting places from NRW.
In order to ensure that no dormouse are disturbed or injured during the clearance works
hedgerows for which removal is required will be coppiced to a height of between 30cm and
50cm during late August/ September/October. This work will be undertaken using hand tools
such as chain saw and brush cutters. A hand search of the area to be coppiced will be undertaken
immediately prior to the works commencing on all hedgerows/scrub. All coppicing of the
hedgerows/scrub will be undertaken under supervision of an appropriate ecologist.
Following coppicing the hedgerow stools/vegetation will be left overnight before removed.
Where possible all hedgerow material will be translocated to areas within the green
infrastructure zones. No hedgerow coppicing or removal will take place between June and July
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 8
inclusive in order to reduce the potential (low) for disturbing or damaging breeding/nesting
dormice and nesting birds.
The location of the translocated hedgerow will be finalised during completion and finalisation
of the green infrastructure plan.
The extent of working area will be clearly marked by the use of high visibility netting which
will prevent accidental encroachment into the more sensitive and retained habitats. This fencing
will be installed before any ground breaking works commence
All contractors undertaking any aspect of the works will receive an on-site induction explaining
the reason for the fence line and the potential presence of dormouse. All contractors will be
made aware of the legal protection afforded to dormouse and the appropriate protocols to
follow in the unlikely event that they disturb a dormouse or observe a dormouse nest.
3 Precautionary Method of Working Nesting Birds
The removal of hedgerows, trees and scrub has the potential to cause disturbance to nesting
birds and potentially damage to actual nests. Nesting birds are afforded legal protection. It is
anticipated that all works will be undertaken outside of the main bird nesting season, although
some works may commence in late August 2017. While August is outside the main nesting
season it is possible that some species may have late clutches and therefore the potential,
although small, does exist for the disturbance to nesting birds .In order to ensure that the works
do not cause disturbance to nesting birds the following precautionary method of working will
be followed.
No more than twenty four hours before works are due to commence the site will be visited by
an ecologist experienced in observing behaviour characteristic of nesting birds and courtship.
The visit will be undertaken during early morning one hour after sunrise. The ecologist will be
positioned such that birds can be observed without changing the normal behaviour pattern of
bird activity within the area of vegetation for which removal is required. The period of
observation will extend to a period of approximately one and half hours, or until the ecologist
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 9
is satisfied that all necessary observations have been made. A record will be made of any areas
of the vegetation where bird behaviour indicated that a nest is likely to be present.
Any areas of hedgerow, or bramble scrub or other habitat for which there is an indication that
a nesting bird is present will be carefully examined to confirm the presence of a nest. Should
an occupied nest (or nest with eggs), or evidence of the commencement of nest building be
found then an exclusion zone of 5m will be enforced to ensure that no disturbance occurs. No
works will be permitted within this exclusion area until the ecologist has confirmed that all
chicks have fledged. This area will be clearly marked on the ground to prevent accidental
incursion.
On the day of the works all exclusion zones will be highlighted to the contractors and the
ecologist will ensure that these exclusion zones are adhered to.
A final nest check will be made during the hand search for dormouse and reptiles.
All contractors will be made aware of the legal protection afforded to nesting birds and the
appropriate protocols to follow in the event that they observe a nest.
LAND OFF JUNCTION 33 THE PARISH SECTION 278 WORKS AND PHASES 1 & 2 DORMOUSE PRECAUTIONARY METHOD OF WORKING FOR PERSIMMON HOMES. TERRAQUA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD JUNE 2017 10
Appendix I
Drawing TQ: S278:P1 V1 Hedgerow and Habitat Removal Plan
Appendix V
Tree Survey, and Tree Constraints Report (BS 5837:2012)
with Arboricultural Impact Assessment
for: Phase 1 & 2. Land to North of Junction 33, Capel Llanilltern,
Cardiff.
For Persimmon Homes East Wales
January 2017
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
2
TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd
Survey Undertaken By:
Carmen Jones MSc MCIEEM and Dyfrig Jones BSc
Report Written By:
Dyfrig Jones
Report Verified By:
Carmen Jones
Copyright TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd. All rights reserved. Ownership of the report remains with TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd until payment has been received in full No part of the report may be altered or extracted without the prior written consent of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd as to the form and context in which it may appear TerrAqua Ecological Services have produced the report for the sole use of the client and no other party may use or copy (Either in part or whole) any part of the report without the written confirmation of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd. Any part of the report cannot be altered or extracted without the prior written consent of TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd as to the form and context in which it may appear. TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd accepts no responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party.
TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd Company Registration Number 805342
W Wales Office Swyn yr Awel, Bwlch y Groes,
Llandysul Ceredigion SA44 5JX
[email protected] Mobile 07951023358
SE Wales Office 36 Somerset Road East Barry Vale of Glamorgan CF63 1BE 01446 748052 [email protected] Mobile 07742149344
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
3
Contents Page
1 Introduction 1.1 Survey Brief 1.2 Client Details
Page 4 Page 4 Page 4
2
Background 2.1 Rationale 2.2 Site Description 2.3 National Designations 2.4 Local Designation
Page 5 Page 5 Page 6 Page 6 Page 6
3
Methodologies 3.1 Survey Dates and Personnel 3.2 Tree Assessment 3.3 Survey Limitations
Page 6 Page 7 Page 7 Page 7
4 5
Tree Schedule & Assessment 4.1 Introduction 4.2 General Observations 4.3 Assessment Arboricultural Impact Assessment 5..1 Summary 5.2 Tree Condition Assessment 5.3 Tree for Removal 5.4 New Tree Planting 5.5 Ground Level Changes 5.6 Tree Protection Fencing
Page 8 Page 8 Page 8 Page 9 Page 11 Page 11 Page 12 Page 12 Page 12 Page 13 Page 13
Appendix I Tree Schedule Appendix II Tree Plan Appendix III Tree Removal and Protection Plan Appendix IV TDA Landscape Proposal Appendix V Assessment Methodology Appendix VI The Protection of Trees on Demolition & Construction Sites
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
4
1 Introduction
1.1 Survey Brief
TerrAqua Ecological Services Ltd was commissioned by Mr Daryl Jones on behalf of
Persimmon Homes East Wales to undertake a Tree Assessment to BS 5837:2012 of land within
Phase 1 & 2 of the referenced site in line with the requirements of Planning Application No:
14/00852/DCO (Approximate central grid reference ST 08886 80347).
The survey boundary was taken as that supplied by Mr Daryl Jones of Persimmon Homes.
The survey was undertaken in August 2017 to discharge Condition, in order to understand any
constraint associated with the trees on site and/or immediately outwith the scheme boundary to
be considered during the planning stage.
1.2 Client Details The following report has been produced for Phase 1 & 2 of the development, north of Junction
33 (M4) at Capel Llanilltern, Cardiff on behalf of Persimmon Homes East Wales, Llantrisant
Business Park, Llantrisant CF72 8YP.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
5
2 Background 2.1 Rational
The survey and associated report plan was requested by the client in support of the planning
application for the re-development of the site, specifically this report addresses Condition 33
which states: “No reserved matters application shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority and no
development or site clearance on that Reserved Matters site shall take place until there has
been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority a tree assessment
in accordance with BS 5837:2012 for that Reserved Matters site. The tree
assessment shall include:
a) an Arboricultural Impact Assessment (AIA);
b) a plan showing the hedgerows and trees to be retained, removed, relocated and planted;
c) an Arboricultural Method Statement (AMS) setting out the methodology that shall be used
to prevent loss of or damage to retained trees. The AMS shall include details of on-site
monitoring of tree protection and tree condition that shall be carried out for at least two
years after its completion; and
d) a Tree Protection Plan (TPP) in the form of a scale drawing showing the finalised layout
and the tree and landscaping protection methods detailed in the AMS that can be shown
graphically.
The development shall be carried out in full conformity with the approved AIA, AMS and TPP
unless modifications to the approved AIA, AMS and TPP are agreed in writing by the Local
Planning Authority.
Reason: To maintain and improve the appearance of the area in the interests of visual
amenity and to protect the aboricultural and ecological resource.”
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
6
2.2 Site Description
The scheme lies adjacent to the A4119 Llantrisant Road and comprises a series of fields
separated by defunct hedgerows. The topography is generally flat lying within a valley
bottom.
The extent of the scheme is presented in Drawings No. TDA.2332.02 Sheet 1, Sheet 2 & Sheet
3: Land North of M4 Junction 33; Detailed Soft Landscape Proposals.
2.3 National Designations
The site (Phase 1 & 2), or any part of, is not covered by any statutory national or international conservation designation such as SAC, SPA or SSSI.
2.4 Local Designations A number of sites designated for their interest to nature conservation (SINCs) are located
within or adjacent to the larger development application boundary. These include Coed
Gwernybwlau, Nant Henstaff, Cadoxton and Trehafod Branch Line, M4Junction 33 Spoil Tip
and Nant-Y-Glaswg. Pencoed Wood SINC is located directly adjacent to the eastern site
boundary.
The Trehafod to Cadoxton Brach Line and Nant y Glaswg SINC are located within the
boundary of Phases 1 and 2 of the development. Pencoed wood forms a boundary with these
Phases. All other SINCs lie outside of the direct influence of the development within Phase 1
and 2.
3 Methodologies
The survey methodologies as used to assess the trees on site are outlined below. Both local
authority and conservation bodies accept these as the standard assessment methodologies for
Trees and Development.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
7
3.1 Survey Dates and Personnel
The survey was undertaken in August 2017 by Carmen Jones MSc MCIEEM Senior Ecological
Consultant and Dyfrig Jones BSc Senior Ecological Consultant. Both are experienced
ecologists with extensive experience in tree assessment under BS5837:2012.
Both Carmen and Dyfrig have undertaken the National Forest Inventory Surveys for Forest
Research over a three (3) year period (2009-2012) which included three (3) intensive five (5)
day training period covering mensuration, FC/FR Software & mapping, tree disease etc to a
standard acceptable to Forest Research/Forestry Commission. Further during the survey work,
the quality of the data was assessed on a three-monthly basis using spot checks undertaken by
experienced FR/FC staff.
Further, Dyfrig has undertaken an CIEEM accredited course on BS5837:2012, run by an
experienced arboriculturist to professional CIEEM standards.
The above experience, coupled to an extensive ecological background is considered suitable
in qualifying the surveyors to undertake BS5837:2012 Surveys
3.2 Tree Assessment
The methodology adopted is that as specified in BS5837:2012 and is outlined in
Appendix 2. Appendix 2 also sets out definitions of the terms used and the
codes/abbreviations employed in the Tree Schedule.
3.3 Survey Limitations
Weather conditions were clear and dry and visibility was quite adequate throughout for
the purposes of this investigation. All inspections were made from ground level only: only
those features apparent at the time of the inspection could be considered and no liability
can be accepted regarding trees or their parts that were inaccessible or obscured in part
or in whole.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
8
It should be stressed that, although the health and safety of the trees is part of the
assessment methodology used, this report is intended for planning purposes only; it
should not be construed as a tree risk assessment. Faults may be identified and recorded
as part of this study but unless the trees in question represent a significant hazard under
the existing site conditions, management recommendations will not normally be made.
It remains the tree owner’s responsibility to ensure the trees are managed appropriately:
the assessor can accept no liability for damage or injury sustained as a result of the
failure of any tree or its parts.
It should be noted that a scheme specific Tree Assessment and AIA have been
undertaken for the S278 works which form the access to the Phase 1 & 2
development site from Llantrisant Road, the arboricultural features noted within that
specific working footprint are excluded from consideration in this report.
4 Tree Schedule & Assessment
4.1 Introduction
Table 1 (Appendix I) provides the Tree Schedule with details of all the trees surveyed;
the associated Tree Plan is presented in Appendix II; notes on the terms and abbreviations
used can be found in Appendix V.
4.2 General Observation Mature hedgerows with trees form a distinct feature within the site and for a boundary for the
eastern most development field from Llantrisant Road.
Many of the trees within the hedgerows show evidence of extensive management especially
with regard to highway maintenance work and historic agricultural management, as such
many of the mature trees are of poor structure and form.
Evidence of ash die-back is noted in some of the mature ash trees within the site boundary.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
9
Mature trees, predominantly oak. Ash and alder but with some sycamores provide an
important arboricultural feature within the site. These important arboricultural features are
due to be retained post development, and are an important ecological feature offering
connectivity from woodland blocks/groups outwith the site boundary through the site to other
receptor areas. I. particular these are noted around Nant y Glaswg, along the western boundary
abutting the Old Railway Line SINC and abutting Pencoed Wood.
The mature woodlands and mature trees which lie immediately outwith the site boundary,
form an important ecological feature and require appropriate protection from works. Details
of the Root Protection Fencing are given in Appendix V. It should be noted that all woodlands
are protected with the inclusion of 10-15m Ecotones in which no groundworks other than
attenuation ponds and cycletrack are permitted, thus ensuring the protection of all RPA’s of
trees within the woodland blocks as noted.
4.3 Assessment Hedgerow H4 with mature trees. Significant management by flailing to ensure highway
clearance works has compromised the growth and development of the trees within the
hedgerow.
Forms the boundary to the A4119 with stock proof fence embedded in the hedgerow. Trees
species present consist of: ash (showing some evidence of die-back) and field maple.
Hedgerow species dominated by hazel and significant stands of Hawthorn.
Overall as a group it is considered that Retention Category of A should be attributed to the
group.
Hedgerow H5 with mature trees. A partially defunct hedgerow forming the eastern boundary
of the site and abutting the access road to Pencoed House. The northern section of the
hedgerow has some dense stands of hazel with hawthorn, while the southern section has been
affected by grazing and is dominated by mature trees and ground/shrub vegetation afeected
by grazing.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
10
Overall as a group it is considered that Retention Category of A should be attributed to the
group.
Group 5: Hedgerow H3. Overgrown hedgerow with ditch, dominated by hazel and hawthorn
but with mature ash, oak, alder and field maple. Evidence of agricultural management
(flailing).
Group 6: overgrown hedgerow dominated by willow spp., forming the eastern extent of the
S278 works and northern section of the river corridor (Nant y Glaswg).
Ecologically it is essential to maintain the structural integrity of the stream corridor and the
functionality of the group in the context of bat flight commuting routes.
Group 7: Hedgerow H6: A largely unremarkable hedgerow of hazel, hawthorn some willow
and alder saplings with two (2) notable trees: Tree T44 (Ash) and T43 (oak). Ground/shrub
flora is dominated by bramble and bracken.
Hedgerow H8: An overgrown former hedgerow now forming the field boundary of the Old
Railway Line SINC woodland. The boundary hedgerow structure is set on top of a bank
(eastern side) formed from the sloping bank of the old railway line. There are three notable
trees within this defined hedgerow namely: T45, T46 and T47.
Hedgerow H9: An overgrown former hedgerow now forming the field boundary of the Old
Railway Line SINC woodland.. There is one notable trees within this defined hedgerow
namely: T42..
In total nineteen (19) notable trees (T1-T13, T42, T43, T44, T45, T46 and T47) were recorded
within, or immediately outwith the site boundary. This does not include the trees within
Pencoed Wood or within the Old Railway Line which form woodland habitats immediately
outwith the site boundary. All the noted trees are Category A trees, many have notable features
for bats and many of the ash species noted also exhibit evidence of ash die-back. The full
details of the tree assessment is provided in Appendix I.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
11
5 Arboricultural Impact Assessment
5.1 Summary
The report is based on the loss/removal of hedgerows and trees within Phase 1 & 2
Development works boundary up to the limit as noted in the accompanying drawing
TDA.2332.02 Sheet 1, 2 &3 (Appendix IV).
5.2 Tree Condition Assessment.
A total of nineteen (19) individual trees were assessed immediately within the development
works footprint, further seven (7) individual hedgerows have been assessed, two (2) of whom
have also been annotated and considered as Groups of trees (H3 and H6). A further five (5)
discreet groups of trees have been considered within the Site Boundary and one (1) group
outwith the site boundary has also been considered (Grp 13). A large woodland area
immediately outwith the site boundary (Pencoed Wood) has also been fully considered during
the development of appropriate Ecotones, Buffer Zones and appropriate protective measures.
All features including individual trees, tree groups and mature hedgerows have been considered
for their ecological value within the Updated Phase 1/Ecological Assessment Survey and
associated reports undertaken in support of the Phase 1 & 2 Development including bat tree
assessments and dormouse methodologies.
All of the individual trees assessed within the site boundary are considered Retention Category
A Trees.
No individual parkland trees were noted within the site/survey boundary.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
12
5.3 Trees for Removal.
As noted in the Tree Removal & Protection Plan (Appendix III), all individual trees as noted
and mapped will be retained.
Tree/hedgerow removal will be restricted to the removal of the following:
• Parts (two (2) sections) of Hedgerow H6 (Group 7) one section 20m (eastern end) and
one section 6.5m (middle)
• Parts (two (2) sections) of Hedgerow H3 (Group 5) one section 30m (western end)
and one section 35m (eastern end)
• Tree Groups 11 & 12: 25m of naturally re-generated riparian corridor.
The sections highlighted above for removal would be considered of low to moderate visual
importance at site level. Their loss in the short to medium term will have a significant impact
on the character or appearance of the site.
Ecologically, Tree Groups 11 & 12 would be considered of moderate importance at Site
level. Their loss in the short to medium term would have a moderate impact on the ecological
functionality of the riparian corridor.
5.4 New Tree Planting
An extensive programme of new tree planting will be carried out once the ground works and
house building has been completed.The location of these trees is shown on the accompanying
Landscape Proposals produced by TDA (see Appendix IV).
The existing tree species present at the site have been considered and new species to be
planted have been selected to enhance the existing tree population.
Further it should be noted that the planting of the Ecotones consist of a mixture of wild seed
mix and understory planting in keeping with species present to enhance the ecological
functionality of those areas thus strengthening the arboricultural mix present on site.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
13
5.5 Ground Level Changes
Any changes in levels or slopes will be undertaken within the development footprint which
excludes the following:
• Root Protection Zones of all retained Trees
• Woodland Ecotones
• Hedgerow root protection zones
The details of the above are presented in the Tree Removal & Protection Plan (Appendix III)
and are also presented in the Landscape Drawing (Appendix IV). 5.6 Tree Protection Fencing
A number of trees and ecological habitats (hedgerows) are to be retained within the
development works footprint. All features will be protected in line with BS5837:2012.
All retained trees will be protected in line with BS5837:2012. Where practicable trees will be
grouped and protected as a group.
Thus:
• T9-T13 will be protected as a group.
• T1-T8 will be protected as a group and will extend to include the protection of Pencoed
Ecotone in its entirety.
• Group 6 will be protected in line with the stated Hedgerow Protection (3m from base
of feature either side)
• Hedgerow H4 will be protected as a linear feature (3m from base of feature either side)
• Group 9 & 10 will be protected as part of the Pencoed Ecotone Protection
• Hedgerow H3 (Group 5) section to be retained will protected in line with the linear
feature (3m from base either side)
• Hedgerow H6 (Group 7) will be protected in line with the linear feature (3m from base
either side) additionally T43 will be protected to the full extent of its RPA
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
14
• Hedgerow H8 & H9 and associated trees (T42, T45, T46 & T47) will be protected
within the Old Railway SINC Woodland Ecotone
• Pencoed Wood. Although outwith the development site, the duty of responsibility
regarding its protection is acknowledged, as such a 15m Ecotone is mapped with no
development within that ecotone. Where any development work within the ecotone is
necessary, it will be carried out to ensure that the RPA of any trees within Pencoed
Wood are fully protected from all work including soil spoil storage and compaction.
For effective tree protection, it is crucial that the protective fencing is installed before any
heavy plant machinery is used on the Site. The tree protection fencing will remain in place
until all the construction works have been completed (unless under arboricultural
supervision). The fenced off areas will be considered construction exclusion zones and are
further considered in the Phase 1 & 2 CEMP which is also submitted in support of the
proposed works.
It should be noted that all woodlands are protected with the inclusion of 10-15m Ecotones in
which no groundworks other than attenuation ponds and cycletrack are permitted, thus
ensuring the protection of all RPA’s of trees within the woodland blocks as noted.
A specification for suitable tree protection fencing is provided in Appendix VI.
TreeAssessmentandArboriculturalImpactAssessmentforPhase1&2oftheDevelopment.Jct33DevelopmentforPersimmonHomesEastWales.January2017
15
Appendix I
Table 1 Tree Schedule: (Details of Terms & Abbreviations in Appendix IV)
ID Tree Species Stem No.
Trunk Diam. (mm)
Ht. (m)
Crown Spread (m) Life Stage
Health & Vigour
Structural Condition
Remaining Useful Life
Description/Features Retention Category
Root Protection Radius (m) & RPA (m2)
N E S W Mean L/H
G5 Hedgerow n/a / / / / / / / / EM Good Good L Hedgerow H3 with a mixture of hedgerow spp and agriculturally managed trees (ash, field maple, oak, alder). Loss of part of the hedgerow at western and eastern extend to facilitate development. (Individual trees within the hedgerow are B, C or U on the basis of form and structure)
A (as a hedgerow)
Variable RPA according to individual trees. All hedgerows with 5m Ecotone Buffer
G6 Overgrown hedgerow/scrub
n/a Av. 230 6 4 6 5 6 3 1 EM Good Good L Forms an important ecological riparian corridor and bat commuting/foraging feature
A 2.8m & 23.9m2
G7 Overgrown hedgerow with trees
n/a / / 3 3 3 3 / / M Good Good L Part of hedgerow H6 will require removal as part of the site development works a section of bracken and bramble will require removal to facilitate footpath. T44 (ash) of 350mm dbh requires appropriate protection. Additional T43 forms dominant feature of hedgerow.
A Variable with overall. 5m Ecotone buffer to all hedgerows with additional RPA for individual trees
G9 Group of alder 5 variable 18+ 5 4 5 4 6 2 M Good Fair L Group of naturally regenerated alder in very wet ground, forming a natural extension to Pencoed Woodland
A for group (individual trees within group would be category B)
RPA Sits within the 15m Ecotone as required by Planning
G10 Mixed group of alder and oak
n/a variable 18+ Variable group growing in wet ground and showing variable form. Many are leaning(may be the result of heavy grazing on wet ground) but as a group form an extension to Pencoed Wood and connectivity to the riparian corridor.
A Taken as 5m from canopy edge
G11 Mixed group of alder, willow and single holly
n/a variable 19 Variable group with some alder showing good form, but many with significant lean over watercourse with potential for windfall and root plate failure
A as riparian group, B as individual trees
Taken as 5m from canopy edge
G12 Group of alder and hazel
5 Variable Variable group with some alder of good form but many showing pronounced lean and twisting.
A as riparian group, B as individual trees
Taken as 5m from canopy edge
G13 Group of alder 5 Variable av. 210 (estimated)
20 Group of 5+ alder in garden of adjoining property. At least three of the group are situated directly on the fenceline and their RPA’s extend inside the development site.
A Taken a 5m from canopy edge
T1 Small leaved lime
1 450 21 7 6 9 6 7 2 M Good Good m Set as avenue of trees on roadside to Pencoed House. Outside development site but RPA will extend into the site.
A 5.4m & 91.6m2
T2 Small leaved Lime
1 750 21 12 8 13 12 6 2 M good Good m Set as avenue of trees on roadside to Pencoed House. Outside development site but RPA will extend into the site
A 9m & 254.5m2
T3 Sycamore 1 950 20 13 7 8 12 8 2 M good Good m Set as avenue of trees on roadside to Pencoed House. Outside development site but RPA will extend into the site
A 11.5M & 408m2
T4 Ash 1 450 18 5 3 7 11 8 2 M Good Good M Large ash set within private drive of Pencoed House RPA will extend into the development site
A 5.4m & 91.6m2
T5 Ash 3 650; 360; 450
14 11 12 13 9 6 2 M Good Good m Large ash set on site boundary just inside Pencoed House grounds
A 8.7m & 237.1m2
T6 Ash 1 2500 19 5 11 13 14 11 2 M Good Good M Large dominant ash on periphery of site bordering the woodland and the open car parking area of Pencoed House
A 15m max (30m) & 2827.8m2
T7 Ash (tagged 02885)
1 910 13 12 11 8 5 6 3 M Good Good L Large ash on woodland edge. A 10.9m & 374.7m2
T8 Oak (tagged 02886)
1 1200 16 7 3 3 4 6 2 M Poor Poor L Large mature oak on boundary with woodland with significant limb loss but of high ecological value
A 14.4m & 651.5m2
T9 Ash 1 830 24 9 11 10 7 13 5 M Good Good L Large ash on boundary of site with woodland and adjacent to watercourse forming important ecological and arb link from woodland and group of trees to N. Some deadwood in canopy.
A 10m & 311.7m2
T10 Oak 1 640 19 4 4 8 4 14 4 M Good Fair L Large oak part of a significant ecological and arb group. Unbalanced growth and development due to completion from T11
A 7.7m & 185.3m2
T11 Oak 1 980 20 11 13 6 9 6 3 M Good Good L Large mature oak part of a significant ecological and arboricultural group of trees. Category 1 Bat Tree assessed a part of the Bat Survey. Some small diameter deadwood, and stem wounds affording potential bat roosting opportunities.
A 11.8m & 434.5m2
T12 Ash 1 880 20 12 8 7 11 10 4 M Good/Fair
Fair Large mature ash with good structure and life expectancy a dominant tree both ecologically and arboriculturally, a part of a significant group of trees with T11,T10 and T13 Large fractured and failed limb, 3-m in length, at 6-m AGL to north east. Small and medium diameter deadwood. Large lateral scaffold limb to south at 5-m AGL with decay cavity at ‘elbow’ on tension side.
A 10.6m & 350.4m2
T13 Oak (Tagged 02888)
1 1180 15 8 10 9 9 Mature oak, part of a significant group of trees. Category 1 Bat tree, has been assessed a part of the Bat Survey.
A 14.2m & 630m2
T42 Ash 2 450;500 12 11 9 7 4 5 2 M Fair Ash showing some evidence of ash die back A 7.5m & 176.7m2
T43 Oak (Tagged 02889)
1 1240 8 12 15 8 12 3 1.75 M Good Good L Mature Oak a key ecological and Arb feature of the hedgerow and the site
A 14.9m & 695.7m2
T44 Ash 1 350 5 3 3 4 4 2.5 1 M Fair Fair S Ash of fair structure but with good potential for future development
A 4.2m & 55.4m2
T45 Sycamore 1 250 18 6 6 9 4 7 2 M Good Good M Sycamore set on slope bottom of old railway line with extensive tree cover beyond
A 2.5m & 19.6m2
T46 Ash 1 780 21 9 15 11 13 9 3 M Fair Fair S Large mature ash, with some early evidence of ash die back in canopy. Will require annual checks to assess extent of ash die-back and retention value and remedial considerations as necessary
A 7.8m & 191.2m2
T47 Ash 1 400 15 4 4 1 2 6 2 M Fair Fair S Ash which is restricted in its development by T46. Catagorised as retention Category A on the basis of its contribution to the old railway line woodland coverage, but as an individual tree B
A 4m & 50.3m2
H4 Hedgerow n/a / / / / / / / / / / / / Managed Highway hedgerow, with extended growth on field side and top, but clear evidence of historical management. Dominated by hawthorn, hazel, ash and field maple
A 5m buffer from hedgerow base
Appendix II
Appendix III
Appendix IV