Upload
truongdien
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rigid Performance
5
7.355.85 3.282
4.621 2
10 1
D L
L L
5.201 2
8.46 3.522
3.631.01
L LD L
18
18
1
1
1
1
Rigid Performance
9
t10 18 10 18 10 18
4.5 plog log W log4.5 1.5
t
10
10 18 10 1818
4.5 plog4.5 1.5 log W log
Rigid Performance
10
t
10
10 18 10 1818
4.5 plog4.5 1.5log W log
t10
10 18 10 18 7
8.46
4.5 plog4.5 1.5log W log
1.62 101.0D 1
Design Equation
14
10
10 18 10 7
8.46
PSIlog4.5 1.5log W 7.35log D 1 0.06
1.62 101.0D 1
0.75t
t 10
0.75
4c
D 1.132f4.22 0.32p log690 18.42D
E k
1972
Concrete Tensile Strength (psi)
Concrete elastic modulus (psi)Effective modulus of subgrade reaction (psi/in)
Design Equation
15
10
10 18 10 7
.
R
8
0
46
PSIlog4.5 1.5log W 7.35log D 1 0.06
1.62 101
Z S1.0
D
0.75
t 10
0.75
4c
c dS C215.6
D 1.1324.22 0.3
3 J2p log
18.42DE k
1993
Concrete MOR (psi) Drainage Coefficient
Joint Load Transfer Coefficient
Drainage Coefficient, Cd
17
Quality< 1% 1-5% 5-25% > 25%
Excellent 1.25-1.20 1.20-1.15 1.15-1.10 1.10Good 1.20-1.15 1.15-1.10 1.10-1.00 1.00Fair 1.15-1.10 1.10-1.00 1.00-0.90 0.90Poor 1.10-1.00 1.00-0.90 0.90-0.80 0.80
Very Poor 1.00-0.90 0.90-0.80 0.80-0.70 0.70
Percentage of Time Material Approaches Saturation
Drainage Quality
18
Quality Water Removed Within
Excellent 2 hoursGood 1 dayFair 1 weekPoor 1 month
Very Poor No drainage
Load Transfer Coefficient, J
19
Asphalt Shoulders Tied PCC Shoulders
Dowels NoDowels Dowels No
DowelsJPCP
3.2 3.8 - 4.4 2.5 - 3.1 3.6 - 4.2JRCP
CRCP 2.9 - 3.2 2.3 - 2.9
NOTE: Use higher J values when you have (a) low k values, (b) lots of trucks, (c) high concrete thermal coefficients, or (d) large variations in temperature.
Recommended Reliability
Functional Classification Urban Rural
Interstate and Other Freeways 85 – 99.9% 80 – 99.9%
Principal Arterials 80 – 99% 75 – 99%
Collectors 80 – 95% 75 – 95%
Local 50 – 80% 50 – 80%
20
Reliability, ZRReliability
(%) ZRReliability
(%) ZR
50 -0.000 93 -1.476
60 -0.253 94 -1.555
70 -0.524 95 -1.645
75 -0.674 96 -1.751
80 -0.841 97 -1.881
85 -1.037 98 -2.054
90 -1.282 99 -2.327
91 -1.340 99.9 -3.090
92 -1.405 99.99 -3.750
Standard Deviation, So
Source Flexible Rigid
AASHO Road Test Sn 0.35 0.25
AASHO Road Test So 0.45 0.35
Typical Range for So 0.40 – 0.50 0.30 – 0.40
22
Textbook Example
24
J = 3.2
So = 0.29k = 72 psi/in
Ec = 5×106 psi
S'c = 650 psi
Cd = 1.0
R = 95%
pi = 4.2
W18 = 5.1×106
pt = 2.5
Reliability, ZRReliability
(%) ZRReliability
(%) ZR
50 -0.000 93 -1.476
60 -0.253 94 -1.555
70 -0.524 95 -1.645
75 -0.674 96 -1.751
80 -0.841 97 -1.881
85 -1.037 98 -2.054
90 -1.282 99 -2.327
91 -1.340 99.9 -3.090
92 -1.405 99.99 -3.750
Design Equation
26
10
10 18 R 0 10 7
8.46
PSIlog4.5 1.5log W Z S 7.35log D 1 0.06
1.62 101.0D 1
0.75c d
t 10
0.75
4c
D 1.132S C4.22 0.32p log215.63 J 18.42D
E k
1993
‐1.645 0.29
4.2 – 2.5 = 1.7
2.5
650 1.0
3.2
5×106 72
Factors Affecting keff
29
Dsb = subbase thickness (in)
LS = loss of support factor
= slab thickness (in)D
MR = subgrade modulus of rupture (psi)
Esb = subbase elastic modulus (psi)
Dsg = subgrade thickness (in)
Solution Procedure
30
Assume a trial slab thickness, D
Calculate k = f(D,MR,Esb,Dsb,Dsg,LS)
Calculate W18 = f(D,k,ZR,So,pt,Sc,Ec,J)
W18 = W18
STOP
Yes
No
Calculating keff
31
1. Determine seasonal values for MR and ESB2. Calculate composite k values assuming no bedrock3. Adjust k values for shallow bedrock (if needed)4. For a given slab thickness, D
a) Convert the k values to damage factors (uf)b) Calculate an average damage factor (uavg)c) Convert uavg into a year‐round keff valued) Adjust keff for loss of support over time
Simplified Version
39
3.420.250.75
i iu D 0.39 k
6c tLet E 5 10 psi and p 2.5
40.2920.75
effD u
k0.39
Equation in the textbook is wrong