Upload
priyamjani
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
1/32
Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under grants DEFG02-07-ER46453 and DEFG02-07-ER46471 2008 University of Illinois Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
Advanced MaterialsCharacterization Workshop
Scanning Electron MicroscopyScanning Electron Microscopy(SEM)(SEM)
Wacek SwiechJim Mabon
Vania Petrova
Mike MarshallIvan Petrov
2
Basic Comparison to Optical Microscopy
1
2 1/20 0 0
1/20
2 1 1/20 0
:
/ 2 (2 )
: (2 )
[2 (1 (2 ) )]non rel
relat
de Broglie h p
eU m v p m v h m eU
hence h m eU
h m eU eU m c
=
= = =
=
= +
OpticalOptical SEM (secondary electron)SEM (secondary electron)The higher resolution and depth of focus available with the SEM are c learly observed,electrons have small mass (m 0).
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
9.84 ( c/3!)0.7030,000
5.851.2210,000
4.161.735,000
1.873.881,000
1.335.48500
v (x10 7 m/s) relat (x10 2 nm)U (V)
P a r a
l l e
l A c q u
i s i t i o n
S e q u e n
t i o a
l A c q u
i s i t i o n
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
2/32
3
What does the SEM do?
An instrument for observing andanalyzing the surface microstructureof a bulk sample using a finelyfocused beam of energetic electrons
An electron-optical system is usedto form the electron probe which isscanned across the surface of thesample (raster pattern).
Various signals are generatedthrough the interaction of this beamwith the sample. These signals arecollected by appropriate detectors.
The signal amplitude obtained ateach position in the raster pattern isassembled to form an image.
Many Applications:Most widely employed microscop ytechnique other then optical microscopy
Surface morphology (SE, BSE, FSE)
Composition analysis (X-EDS, WDS)Crystallography (electron diffraction andchanneling techniques)
Optical properties (cathodoluminescence CL)Many other more specialized applications
Animation from A Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Microanalytical Instruments
4
Secondary and Backscattered Electrons
Backscattered electronsare primary beamelectrons scattered backout of the sample.
Secondary electrons arelow energy electronsejected from the specimenatoms by the energeticprimary beam
Adapted From L. Reimer, Scanning Electron Microscopy ,2nd edition, Springer Verlag
Energy Distribution of Emitted Electrons
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
3/32
5
Electron Beam / Specimen InteractionsIncident
BeamSecondaryelectrons (SE)
Characteristic X-rays
UV/Visible/IRLight
BremsstrahlungX-rays
Backscatteredelectrons (BSE)
Auger electrons
EDS/WDSEDS/WDSImagingImaging
CLCL
Heat
Specimen Current
Isc = Ib Ib Ib = Ib 1 +))
Elastic ScatteringInelastic ScatteringMicrometer-size Interaction Volume
ImagingImagingIsc
, E =0.5-30 keV, = 0.2-1 o
6
5 keV
15 keV
15 keV
15 keV
15 keV
25 keV
W
C
Al
TiTiTi
Monte-Carlo simulations of electron scattering
PMMA @ 20kVEverhart et.al. (1972)
Animation from A Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Microanalytical Instruments
Monte Carlo Calculations, CASINO
Simulations are very useful fortesting if a measurement ispossible or interpreting results
Determine effective lateral or depthresolution for a particular signal in adefined sample
Simulate X-ray generation / X-rayspectra in a defined sample
Simulate image contrast
1 m
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
4/32
7
Sequential Image Acquisition in SEM
The scan of the electronbeam and the screen rasterare synchronized withintensity proportional to thecollected signal
Magnification is given bythe ratio of the length of the
line on display device tolength scanned on the realsample
Figure from Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
M = L display /L specimen
Animations from, The Oxford Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Instruments Microanalysis Group
8
Typical SEM Column / Vacuum ConditionsJEOL 6060LV
Courtesy JEOL USA
An SEM specimen chamber typicallyoperates at high vacuum conditions:Vacuum
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
5/32
9
Thermionic Sources- Tungsten Filament / LaB 6
Schematic of a generalizedW-Hairpin electron source
LaB 6W
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
http://www.feibeamtech.com/pages/schottky.html
10
Cold Field Emission Electron SourceSharp Single Crystal (310) Tungsten Tip
(310)
Courtesy Hitachi Instruments From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
Courtesy Hitachi Instruments
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
6/32
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
7/32
13
Major Electron Beam Parameters
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
Four electron beam parameters define
the probe which determine resolution,contrast, and depth of focus of SEMimages:
Probe diameter d p Probe current I p Probe convergence angle p Accelerating Voltage V o
These interdependent parameters mustbe balanced by the operator to optimizethe probe conditions depending onneeds:
Resolution Depth of Focus Image Quality (S/N ratio) Analytical Performance
Electron optical brightness, , is a constantthroughout the column, thus is a veryimportant electron source parameter
14
Origin of Depth of Focus
Adapted from Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
Quantifying Depth ofFocus
For an observer it is takenthat image defocusbecomes detectable whentwo image elements fullyoverlap, where an imageelement is given by theresolving power of thehuman eye (~0.1mm).
The depth of focus canthen be describedgeometrically by:
D ~ 0.2 mm / M
Distance above andbelow plane of focusthat beam becomesbroadened to anoticeable sizeblurring in theimage
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
8/32
15
Objective
Aperture
Function of Condenser Lens
Ray diagram forlens weaklyexcited
Longer focallength, Small 1, Larger d 1
More beamaccepted intoobjectiveaperture
Higher probecurrent atspecimen
Larger focal
spot atspecimen Lower
resolution Higher Signal
Levels
Ray diagram for lensstrongly excited
Short focal length,Small 1, Smaller d 1
Less beam acceptedinto objectiveaperture
Lower probe currentat specimen
Smaller focal spot atspecimen
Higher Resolution
Lower Signal Levels
Adapted from Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
De-magnify the beam obtained from the source to enable a small spot to beobtained on the sample. Multiple lenses are more typically used in the condenserlens system.
1 1 1u v f
+ =Object Image
u v / M v u=
16
Objective Lens / Working Distance
Focus the electron beam onthe specimen with minimallens aberrations
Short Focal Lengths(W 1) > smaller d 2, larger 2 ->better resolution
Longer Focal Lengths(W 2) > larger d 2, smaller 2 ->better depth of field
Smaller Apertures > smaller d 2, smaller 2 ->
better resolution & better depth of focus
Correction coils are used tocorrect asymmetries in lens(correct astigmatism)
Adapted from Scanning ElectronMicroscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al.Plenum Press
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
9/32
17
Lens Aberrations / Optimum Aperture Angle
Adapted from Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
Aperture diffraction
causes a fundamentallimit to the achievableprobe size
Spherical Aberration
Chromatic Aberration
Optimum apertureangle determinedby combined effectof sphericalaberration andaperture diffraction
18
Lens Aberrations / AstigmatismLens Aberrations Astigmatism
Adapted from Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
Astigmatism is caused by imperfections in the lens or other interference.It can be corrected using additional elements called stigmatorscontained inside the objective lens
Octupole lens stigmator
Magnetostaticquadrupole lens isbasis of a stigmator
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
10/32
19
Secondary Electron Detector / Imaging
Faraday Cage (collector) is usuallybiased a few hundred volts positive(for collection efficiency)
Scintillator is biased +10kV toaccelerate electrons to sufficientenergy to efficiently excite scintillatingmaterial
Amplified output level is directly usedto set brightness (offset) and contrast(gain) in corresponding pixel in image
Contrast from predominatelyangular dependence ofsecondary electron yield andedge effects.
Everhart-Thornley SE detector
Reactive ion etching of Al/Si(001)
20
Secondary Electron YieldDependence of SE yield with angle(local) of incidence with surface
Escape probability forSEs as a function of depthof generationimage resolution for SEimaging will approach theprobe size
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
11/32
21
Edge Effect on SE Yield
Adapted From L. Reimer, Scanning Electron Microscopy ,2nd edition, Springer Verlag
22
Analogy to Oblique and Diffuse Optical Illumination
Secondary electronyield is stronglydependent on localangle of incidencewith beam
Backscatteredelectrons are alsodirectly and indirectlydetected (image is notpure SE)
Together this, alongwith the high depth offocus of the SEM,gives the familiar SEMimages with a goodperceptive sense ofsurface topography
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
12/32
23
Exceptionally High depth of Focus
Carbon NanotubeElectrodeposited Gold DendriticStructure
100,000X original magnification10,000X original magnification
24
Extremely Wide Range of Magnifications
Sputtered Au-Pd on Magnetic TapeMiniature Sensor Device -Calorimeter
12X original magnification 500,000X original magnification
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
13/32
25
Backscattered Electron Detectors and Yield
Solid State 4 quadrantBackscattered Electrondetector placed annular tobottom of objective lens
Composition image electronically sum signalfrom all 4 quadrants
BSE topographic images differencing various detectorquadrants
Backscattered electron yieldis a strongly dependent onsample mean atomic number
Graphic from, The Oxford Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Instruments Microanalysis Group
Typical 4 quadrant solid state BSE detector
Objective lens pole piece
26
Backscattered Compositional Contrast
Secondary Electron Image Backscattered Electron Image
SnBi alloy most useful on multi-phase samples can be sensitive to < 0.01 average Z differences flat-polished specimens essential
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
14/32
27
Non-Conductive Specimens - Charging
=0Isc = Ib Ib Ib = Ib 1 + ))
Upper cross-over energy, E 2,for several materials
Total emitted electron coefficient+ as a function of beam energyWhen +=1 charge balance
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
28
Variable Pressure (VP / LV / Environmental) SEM A different and simpler solution to specimen charging of un-coated non-
conductive samples is to introduce a gas (air, etc.) into the specimen chamber.
The high energy electrons ionize the gas, thus positive ions are available todynamically neutralize any charge on the sample.
Available in both Schottky and Thermionic (Tungsten) instruments
Uncoated Dysprosium Niobium Oxide Ceramic@ highvacuum
@ 20 Paair
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
15/32
29
Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) solid state detector simultaneously measures allenergies of X-ray photons
Wavelength Dispersive Spectroscopy (WDS) sequentially measures intensity vs X-raywavelength (energy). Superior energy resolution and detection limits (P/B ratio).
Electron Backscattered Diffraction (EBSD) acquires electron diffraction informationfrom surface of highly tilted bulk sample with lateral resolution of 10s of nm
Cathodoluminesence (CL) optical emission spectrometer and imaging system for 300-1,700nm. Liquid He cooled stage module.
EDSEDS
WDSWDS
CLCL
JEOL JSM-7000F Analytical Scanning Electron Microscope
EBSDEBSD
30
Characteristic X-ray Generation A scattering event kicks out
an electron from K,L,M, or Nshell of atom in specimen
An electron from an outershell falls to fill in thevacancy
Energy difference results inrelease of an X-ray ofcharacteristicenergy/wavelength or anAuger electron
Atomic Number
X-ray vs. Auger Generation
Graphic from, The Oxford Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Instruments Microanalysis Group
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
16/32
31
Energies of Characteristic X-rays to 20 keV
From Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis , Joseph I. Goldstein et al. Plenum Press
32
Energy Dispersive X-ray Detector: Si(Li)
Collimator
MagneticElectronTrap
X-ray Window
Si(Li)Detector
FETchargesensitiveamplifier
Copper Rod(at Liq. N 2Temperature)
Graphics from A Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Microanalytical Instruments
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
17/32
33
Mechanism of X-ray Energy Determination
X-ray loses energy through inelasticscattering events creating electron /hole pairs
High voltage bias keeps generatedpairs from re-combining
Charge sensitive amplifier countspairs generated by X-ray
Spectrometer calibration effectivelymultiplies by energy/pair (3.8 eV) todetermine X-ray energy
V o l t a g e
Time
Charge
restore
Voltagestep
X-ray event
Animations from, The Oxford Guide to X-Ray Microanalysis ,Oxford Instruments Microanalysis Group
34
EDS Spectral Resolution and Count RatesPulse processing timeconstants are used toadjust available count rateversus spectral peakresolution
Long time constants are best for singleacquisition analysis for best energy resolution.
Short time constants are best for fastacquisition of X-ray elemental maps(elemental distribution images) or line-scans(intensity or concentration profiles).
Compromise is often needed.
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
18/32
35
X-ray EDS Microanalysis in the SEM
Fast Parallel Detection
Qualitative elementalanalysis From beryllium up on
periodic table Sensitivities to
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
19/32
37
Parallel Beam WDS
X-ray Optical Systems, Inc.http://www.xos.com/index.php/?page_id=71&m=2&sm=3
Comparison of EDS (SiLi) toParallel Beam WDS(Thermo Instruments MaxRay)
Hybrid X-ray Optic containing both apolycapillary optic (up to ~12 keV) and aparabaloidal grazing incidence optic(up to ~ 2.3 keV)
Courtesy Thermo Instruments
Ex. Identification
of sub-micron WParticle on Si
Electron Backscattered Diffraction in the SEM (EBSD)
Courtesy HKL Technology (Oxford InstrumentsMicroanalysis Group)
70(202)
(022)
(220)
Silicon
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
20/32
39
EBSD of GaAs Wafer
LT
TN
LN
N
L (RD) Rolling
N (ST) Normal
T (LT) Transverse
Microtexture in Al-Li Alloys for Future Aerospace ApplicationsInvestigation of crystallographic aspects grain morphology and delaminations
Complimentary toXRD texturedetermination
- gives local texture& misorientationsTrue Grain ID, Size and Shape Determination
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
21/32
41
Channeling / Diffraction Contrast with a Forward Scatter detector
316L Stainless Steel
Before deformation: equiaxedgrains with no deformation
evident and lots of annealingtwins
Deformed to uniform elongation@ 200 C, considerable strain
contrast, individual grains nolonger discernable, highlydeformed structure
42
Limit of Lateral Resolution for EBSD
5 m step size = 0.01 m Deformed Copper
Literature generallyreports a lateralresolution limit (x-direction) of 5 50nm.Resolution in the y-direction is somewhatless due to high tilt ofsample.
Actual resolutionobtained depends on
beam voltage, probesize, sample material(Z), specimenpreparation, etc.
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
22/32
43
Phase Discrimination / Phase IDForward Scatter image
Phase Image (Stainless Steel)Red = FCC ironBlue = BCC iron
Z-projected Inverse Pole FigureImage
44
Cathodoluminesence (CL)Emission of light from a material during irradiation byan energetic beam of electrons
Wavelength (nm)Collection of emitted light
Parabaloidal mirrorplaced immediatelyabove sample (samplesurface at focal point)
Aperture for electron beam
Collection optic in position between OL lens and sample
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
23/32
45
Cathodoluminesence Imaging and Spectroscopy
Optical spectroscopy from 300to 1700 nm
Panchromatic andmonochromatic imaging (spatialresolution - 0.1 to 1 micron)
Parallel Spectroscopy (CCD)and full spectrum imaging
Enhanced spectroscopy and/orimaging with cooled samples(liq. He)
Applications include: Semiconductor bulk materials Semiconductor epitaxial layers Quantum wells, dots, wires Opto-electronic materials Phosphors Diamond and diamond films Ceramics Geological materials Biological applications
(fluorescent tags)
46
Pan-Chromatic CL imaging of GaN
Defects (dislocations) areobserved as points or lines ofreduced emission
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
24/32
47
Monochromatic CL imaging of GaN Pyramids
SEM composite
550 nm
The strongest yellow emissioncomes from the apex of theelongated hexagonal structure.
CL Image
550 nmCL imaging ofcross-sectionalview
SEM
Results courtesy of Xiuling Li , Paul W. Bohn, and J. J. Coleman, UIUC
Typical CL spectra
48
The Dual-Beam Focused Ion Beam (DB-FIB)Electroncolumn
Ioncolumn
Ptdoser
The FEI Dual-Beam DB-235 FocusedIon Beam and FEG-SEM has a highresolution imaging (7nm) Ga + ion columnfor site-specific cross-sectioning, TEMsample preparation, and nano-fabrication. The Scanning ElectronMicroscope ( SEM ) column provides highresolution (2.5 nm) imaging prior to,during, and after milling with the ionbeam. The instrument is equipped withbeam activated Pt deposition and 2 in-situ nanomanipulators: Omniprobe forTEM sample preparation and Zyvex formultiprobe experiments.
site specific cross-sectioning and imaging* Serial sections and 3-D reconstruction are an extension of this method
site specific preparation of specimens for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) site specific preparation of specimens for EBSD nano-fabrication (micro-machining and beam-induced deposition) modification of electrical routing on semiconductor devices failure analysis mask repair
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
25/32
49
Ion Microscopy: Ions andElectrons
The gallium ion beam hits the specimenthereby releasing secondaryelectrons , secondary ions and neutralparticles (e.g. milling).
The detector collects secondary electronsor ions to form an image.
For deposition and enhanced etching:gases can be injected to the system.
Layout of the
Focused Ion Beam column
Liquid Metal Ion Source
The Focused Ion Beam (FIB) Column
50
Ion/Electron Beam Induced Deposition
Precursor moleculesadsorb on surfacePrecursor isdecomposed by ionor electron beamimpinging on surfaceDeposited film is lefton surfaceVolatile reactionproducts arereleased
IBID and EBID
Similarly, reactive gases, can beinjected for enhanced etching inmilling and improving aspect ratio formilled features
Pt, W, and Au are common metalsSiO x can be deposited as an insulator
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
26/32
51
The DB-FIB Specimen Chamber
Pt Injection Needle
FIB Column
CDEM detector
Electron Column
ET & TLDelectron detectors
Specimen Stage(chamber door open)
52
Polished CrossSection of Semiconductor 1. Locate area of interest
2. Deposit Pt ProtectionLayer
3. Mill stair step trench(20nA), face (1nA)cross-section, andpolish (0.1nA) - all withion beam
4. Image features with
SEM or Ion beam
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
27/32
53
TEM Sample Preparation w/ Omniprobe
Step 1 - Locate the area ofinterest (site specific)
Step 2 - Deposit a protectiveplatinum layer
Step 3 - Mill initial trenches
e-beam view after Step 3
Step 5 - Perform frame cutsand weld" manipulator needle tosample
Step 6 Mill to release fromsubstrate and transfer to grid
Step 7 "Weld" sample to a CuTEM half-grid and FIB cutmanipulator needle free
Step 8 - FIB ion polish toelectron transparency
54
Pre-Thinned TEM Sample prepared by FIBDiced Wafer with Thin Film Prethinned Section
Prethinned TEM Sample on Half Grid After Thinning
TEM Direction
TEM Direction
Ion Beam DirectionPt ProtectionLayer
Half Grid
Grind to 30 MicronsDice to 2.5 mm
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
28/32
55
Pre-Thinned TEM Sample prepared by FIB
Drawing of typicalpre- thinnedspecimen for FIBTEM samplepreparation
56
Software for Controlled Patterning in FEIDB235
Developed by Jim Mabon
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
29/32
57
Precisely controlled etching and deposition
500 nm
Pt Flower
30 nm Pt dot array
Etched or deposited structures using grey-scale bitmaps (more complex,parallel process) or scripting language (sequential, unlimited # of points).
58
Photonic Array: A seed layer for photoniccell crystal growth nucleation fabricated(etching) with the FIB.J. Lewis, P. Braun
Pt Dot: This Platinum dot is used as an etchmask in porous silicon experiments.P. Bohn
FIB patterning by etching and/or depositionBitmap Script
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
30/32
59
5m
[110]
[110]
Step 1 :Micro-structures by FIB fabrication
: 5.5 : 13.7
1m
: 75
[110]
Step 2 :
Ge growth on extra large-miscut Si
Step 3 :Isolate specified orientation
Exploration of novel orientations in Si crystalline structure:Ge nanostructure growth on Si
: 28.2
FIB & AFM
K. Ohmori, Y.-L. Foo, S. Hong, J.-G. W en, J.E.Greene, and I. Petrov, Nanoletters, 5 369 2005
60
Ge nanowires on Si(173 100 373)
Long straight Ge nanowires on Si(173 100 373)period: 60 nmwidth: ~40 nm
azimuthal direction d : 114
500 nm
[110]d
Z-contrast STEM image20 nm
[121]Si substrate
(517)(113) (111)
Hill-valley structure composed of(113)&(517) facets
Plane index: (k 100 200+k)
4 m
: 75 p
: 28.2 [110]
K. Ohmori, Y.-L. Foo, S. Hong, J.-G. W en, J.E. Greene, and I. Petrov,Nanoletters, 5 369 2005
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
31/32
61
Summary: Scanning Electron Microscopy
Remarkable depth of focus Imaging from millimeters to a nanometer Chemical composition with 0.1-1 m resolution Crystallography using electron EBSD Optical properties on a micrometer scale (via CL)
62
Site specific cross-sectioning imaging and EBSD Serial sections and 3-D reconstruction are an
extension of this method Site specific preparation of specimens for
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) Nano-fabrication (micro-machining and beam-induced
deposition)
Modification of the electrical routing on semiconductordevices
Summary: Focus Ion Beam Microscopy
8/12/2019 AMCWorkshop-2008 SEM Ver02 Handouts
32/32
63
References
Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis by Joseph Goldstein, Dale E.Newbury, David C. Joy, and Charles E. Lyman (Hardcover - Feb 2003)
Scanning Electron Micros copy: Physics o f Image Formation and Microanalysis (SpringerSeries in Optical Sciences) by Ludwig Reimer and P.W. Hawkes (Hardcover - Oct 16, 1998)
Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis in the Electron Microscope (Microscopy Handbooks) by DCBell (Paperback - Jan 1, 2003)
Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introducti on to TEM, SEM, and AEM by RayF. Egerton (Hardcover - April 25, 2008)
Adv anced Scann ing Elect ron Micr osc opy and X-Ray Micr oanalysi s by Patrick Echlin, C.E.Fiori, Joseph Goldstein, and David C. Joy (Hardcover - Mar 31, 1986)
Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis (Oxford Series in Opticaland Imaging Sciences) by David C. Joy (Hardcover - April 13, 1995)
Electron Backscatter Diffraction i n Materials Science by Adam J. Schwartz, Mukul Kumar,David P. Field, and Brent L. Adams (Hardcover - Sep 30, 2000)
Introduction t o Texture Analysis: Macrotexture, Microtexture and Orientation Mapping byValerie Randle and Olaf Engler (Hardcover - Aug 7, 2000)
Electron backscattered diffraction: an EBSD system added to an SEM is a valuable newtool in the materials characterization arsenal : An article from: Advanced Materials & Processesby Tim Maitland (Jul 31, 2005)
Cathodolumin escence Microscopy of Inorganic Solids by B.G. Yacobi and D.B. Holt(Hardcover - Feb 28, 1990)
Introduction to Focused Ion Beams: Instr umentation, Theory, Techniques and Practice by
Lucille A. Giannuzzi and Fred A. Stevie (Hardcover - Nov 19, 2004)
64
Acknowledgements
Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory issupported by the U.S. Department of Energy
under grant DEFG02-07-ER46453 and DEFG02-07-46471
Sponsors: