7/30/2019 anti-BHO CXIV

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anti-bho-cxiv 1/2

You have just received an op-ed which could “help” BHO “do the right thing” [for a change]; tremendous

effort was expended to get it onto the Internet ASAP, as BHO was pounding the war-drums, and it is also

anticipated that the Jerusalem Post will publish a version thereof on Monday [as two other entities mull

it over]. The text has been vetted by many “pairs of eyes” during the past week, yielding information

that, candidly, constituted “95% ‘new’ data” to the primary author [moi ]. Corroboration of its accuracy

was provided, for example, by the reviewer of one other entity that plans October publication:

Our position has generally been that a fully independent Kurdistan should be brought

about which would incorporate territory from Iraq and Turkey as well as Syria. Especially

now, when everything is in flux, there really is no reason not to press for more than just

a small Kurdish state in a federated Syria which is not a very likely outcome to begin

with. We think the Kurds need to be able to defend themselves and that requires a

Kurdish nation-state.

Discussed previously has been the false-narrative permeating the media that the only alternatives areAssad vs. al-Qaeda, and it is therefore advised that the reader consider this essay, if nothing else, to be a

“call to arms” regarding the need to learn as much as possible about Kurdish history and culture.

Another reviewer was provided what may be considered a somewhat offbeat cover-letter:

Appended is the essay submitted yesterday, which we feel should be published ASAP.

Regardless of who engaged in chemical warfare, it is desirable to demonstrate restraint.

Yet, the false paradigm [Assad vs. al-Qaeda] that dominates the media must be fixed.

America can support the Kurds and then build non-Islamist support from that

foundation. Due to this urgency, WE WOULD NOT MIND IT IF ANYONE EDITED IT TO

YOUR SPECIFICATIONS. This article documents—incrementally—how this can be done

[and associated pitfalls].

Specifically, we harbor no particular “pride of ownership” or any ego -driven

motivations. The implications of adopting this policy could have a positive ripple-effect,

but that’s not our focus. RSVP [26 hours/day, 8 days/week] @ 215=333-4900; we would

prefer Internet-access, for now.

Thus, this piece is provided in lieu of summarizing ~6 pages of hyperlinks regarding the Middle East

[tentatively], and it is requested that these concepts be disseminated to others who can ’t figure-out

what America should do regarding Syria, inasmuch as Congressional debate apparently will transpire

regarding a “war resolution” in ~11 days. [Of course, one wonders why BHO was so time-urgent when

he and Kerry discussed the situation yesterday but, today, is quite willing to await the onset of the new

session rather than, for example, foregoing his European jaunt and presenting his case after Labor Day.]

7/30/2019 anti-BHO CXIV

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anti-bho-cxiv 2/2

 

It is truly remarkable how desperately BHO’s acolytes have strained to support him as

he twists/turns, particularly those of the anti-War “left.” CNN’s commentary after the

BHO-speech was muted, with most all correspondents using the term “interesting.” 

[This word—along with “nice”—are best viewed as “pro-jectives,” a neologism that

combines “pronoun” and “adjective”; they actually are place-holders, signifying nothing,reflecting the abject-vacuousness and/or evasive-desire of the speaker.] Naturally,

analysis on FNC was far more expansive, with the endpoint suggesting that BHO may

trully want Congress to do exactly what Parliament did…because he prefers invisibility.

In any case, as will be detailed in upcoming “blasts,” it is vital to compartmentalize the issues, lest the

latest suggestions from the BHO-ites be permitted to muddy the water [attempting to link a request for

more military-$ to an effort to bust the Sequester]. That BHO’s standing will be injured by his errant

foreign policy should embolden GOP-ites who will be asked [gently/firmly] to defund ObamaCare.

Mechanisms have been devised to help them “save face,” but they will confront a seething-base if they

fail to remember the aphorism, “If you fund it, you own it!”