17
2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希 2017 / 12 / 28 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希 (大阪大学理学研究科 山中卓グループ) 1 ATLAS実験における 終状態に4つのbクォークを含む ヒッグス粒子対生成事象を通じた新粒子探索 Search for new particles via Higgs boson pair production in the 4b final state with the ATLAS experiment

ATLAS実験における 終状態に4つのbクォークを含む ヒッグ …osksn2.hep.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp/2017Nenmatsu/slides/yajima...2017/12/28  · ATLAS実験における 終状態に4つのbクォークを含む

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会

    矢島 和希 (大阪大学理学研究科 山中卓グループ)

    1

    ATLAS実験における
終状態に4つのbクォークを含む
ヒッグス粒子対生成事象を通じた新粒子探索

    Search for new particles via Higgs boson pair production in the 4b final state with the ATLAS experiment

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • ATLAS experiment • Goal:Search for new physics, Precise measurement of Higgs boson • Using Large Hadron Collider (CM energy = 13TeV) • Unique experiment which can observe Higgs as well as CMS

    • Run-2 is running from 2015

    LHC-ATLAS Experiment

    2

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Search for Higgs pair production events • Vector boson fusion (VBF) • Gluon gluon fusion (ggF) • Theory • 2 Higgs Doublet Model • Heavy higgs (H0)

    • Randall-Sundrum model • Graviton (GRS)

    • Discrepancy from SM • hhVV 4-point coupling • Higgs self-couplings

    • Dimension-6 operator

    Target

    3

    W±/Z

    W±/Z

    Hh

    h

    q

    q

    q0

    b

    b

    q0

    Hh

    h

    g

    g

    b

    b

    VBF process

    ggF process

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    hh → 4b (VBF) analysis

    4

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Dataset • Signal : 2HDM MC samples 
+ Background : 2016 data

    • Searches for di-Higgs events 
via gluon gluon Fusion(ggF) process • Results of ATLAS Run1, 2(~2015) analysis are published

    • Optimize and introduce new method to current ggF analysis
for this VBF analysis

    Strategy

    5

    VBF Δη、mass

    Hh

    h

    g

    g

    b

    b

    hh→4b search using 2015 Data
Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 052002

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • di-Higgs • 4 b-jets in the final state • Correlation between
distance of 2 b-jets and 
Higgs momentum

    • VBF • 2 forward jets • Large mjj • Large Δη

    Characteristic signal

    6

    W±/Z

    W±/Z

    Hh

    h

    q

    q

    q0

    b

    b

    q0

    ηBJet 4− 3− 2− 1− 0 1 2 3 4

    Even

    ts

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000 ATLAS work in progress

    VBF 2HDM :
 mH = 400 GeV

    b-jets η

    ηTrue VBF particles 4− 3− 2− 1− 0 1 2 3 4

    Even

    ts

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200 ATLAS work in progress

    VBF 2HDM :
 mH = 400 GeV

    VBF jets η

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • At least 4 b-tagged jets • b-jet pair from Higgs decay • → ΔRjj is highly correlating to M4j

    • Apply cuts 
avoiding biasing toward M4j distribution

    Reconstruction of Higgs

    7

    h←X→h

    h←X→h

    [GeV]hhm0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    lead

    . Hig

    gs) jj

    R∆(

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7 dRjj_LeadH_vs_M_hhEntries 24053Mean x 315Mean y 1.734Std Dev x 58.71Std Dev y 0.5642

    1

    10

    210dRjj_LeadH_vs_M_hhEntries 24053Mean x 315Mean y 1.734Std Dev x 58.71Std Dev y 0.5642

    dRjj_LeadH_vs_M_hh

    ATLAS work in progress

    2HDM : mH = 400 GeV

    (ΔR)

    jj for

    Lea

    d. H

    iggs

    can

    d.

    (Mass)4j [GeV]

    Correct pairing

    [GeV]hhm0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    lead

    . Hig

    gs) jj

    R∆(

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7 dRjj_LeadH_vs_M_hhEntries 41384Mean x 313.1Mean y 2.539Std Dev x 67.03Std Dev y 0.6442

    1

    10

    210

    dRjj_LeadH_vs_M_hhEntries 41384Mean x 313.1Mean y 2.539Std Dev x 67.03Std Dev y 0.6442

    dRjj_LeadH_vs_M_hh

    ATLAS work in progress

    2HDM : mH = 400 GeV

    (ΔR)

    jj for

    Lea

    d. H

    iggs

    can

    d.

    (Mass)4j [GeV]

    Wrong pairing

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • 0. Pre-selection : #jets > 4 & #b-jet > 1 with (pT > 25 GeV & |η| < 2.5) • 1. At least 4 b-jets with (pT > 40 GeV & |η| < 2.5) • 4 b-jets with the highest b-tagging score are used for pairing

    • 2. ΔRjj cut : • If multiple pairings pass this cut, 
choose the pairing 
with minimum Dhh

    • 3. pT - m4j cut • 4. |Δηhh| < 1.5 • → Depends on m4j

    • 5. Xhh cut : • → Signal region

    Event selection for ggF

    8

    From 2015 analysis
Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 052002

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Unique kinematic features for VBF process • Forward jets • Large invariant mass

    • Add selections below • For non b-tagged jets • Jet pairs requiring mjj > 1200GeV, Δη > 5.0

    New selection for VBF process

    9

    VBFVBF

    True VBF particles Mass0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

    Even

    ts

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    ATLAS work in progress

    VBF 2HDM :
 mH = 400 GeV

    Invariant mass of VBF jets

    η∆True VBF particles 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Even

    ts

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300 ATLAS work in progress

    VBF 2HDM :
 mH = 400 GeV

    Δη between 2 VBF jets

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Backgrounds • QCD multi jet、ttbar+jets, VBF WW, WZ, ZZ …

    • Estimate the number of QCD background from the data • Shape : 2-tag category • Scale : (2-tag)/(4-tag) ratio in side-band region

    Background Estimation

    10

    Control regionSignal region

    Side-band region

    2-tag
SR

    4-tag
SR

    2-tagSB

    4-tag
SB

    Signal region

    Side-band

    2-tag 4-tag

    ratio

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Calculate sensitivity to new particle based on Signal/BG ratio • Assuming 2HDM Type-II model (tanβ= 2.0, sin(β-α) = 0.6) and
∫L dt = 80fb-1

    • 0.20 (mH=260GeV) - 3.24σ(800GeV)

    Sensitivity Estimation

    11

    ATLAS work in progress

    VBF 2HDM :
mH = 260-1000GeV

    BackGround

    Signals

    Mass4j [GeV]

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    Plan for hh → 4b (ggF) analysis

    12

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Resolved • Pair of b-jets separates • Reconstucted by Anti kT (R=0.4) • Target
→ Lighter new particle(< 1TeV)

    • Boosted • Pair of b-jets is merged • Anti kT (R=1.0) → Large-R jets • Target
→ Heavier new particle(> 1TeV)

    ggF analysis

    13

    h←X→h

    h←X→h

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Variable-R jet reconstruction • ΔRbb depends on Higgs pT • But now, “R” is fixed value
on reconstruction phase

    • → make it float • MVA for jet energy reconstruction • Introduce 
Multi Variables Analysis(MVA) 
to jet energy reconstruction

    • Use information of
tracks, leptons in jets, ..etc.

    • Already discussed in VH analysis

    Ideas

    14

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • Aiming to discover new particles via Higgs boson pair production
in the 4b final state with the ATLAS experiment


    • Discussed about possibility of discovering
Higgs pair production events via VBF process for the first time • Optimized and introduced new method to the current ggF analysis
for this VBF analysis → Improve

    • Developing new analysis techniques
for searching hh→4b events via ggF process

    Conclusion

    15

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    Additional slides

    16

  • 2017年 山中研・久野研 合同年末発表会 矢島 和希2017 / 12 / 28

    • 0. Pre-selection : #jets > 4 & #b-jet > 1 with (pT > 25 GeV & |η| < 2.5) • 1. At least 4 b-jets with (pT > 40 GeV & |η| < 2.5) • 4 b-jets with the highest b-tagging score are used for pairing

    • 2. ΔRjj cut : Formula 1. • If multiple pairings pass this cut, 
choose the pairing 
with minimum Dhh (Formula 2.)

    • 3. pT cut : Formula 3. • 4. |Δηhh| < 1.5 • → Depends on m4j

    • 5. Xhh cut : Formula 4. • → Signal region

    Event selections for ggF di-Higgs Resolved

    17

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.