Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
강동경희대병원
외과 조진현
Autologous Stem Cell Therapy
for Diabetic Limb Ischemia
제24차대한당뇨병학회춘계학술대회
Cerebrovascular disease
Retinopathy
Coronary artery disease
Nephropathy
Peripheral vascular disease
Diabetic foot
Claudication Resting pain
Gangrene
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Claudication
Current Treatment of PAD
Treatment
1. Risk factor modification
2. Exercise
3. Medication, eg Cilostazol
Bypass surgery
Endovascular surgery
Treatment
Primary amputation
2009. 5. 2009. 9. 2009. 11.
Treatment
?
Up to 30% of patients are not candidates
for surgical or endovascular treatment
due to high operative risk or
unfavorable vascular involvement.
Lawall et al. JVS 2011;53:445-53
New vessel
growth
Therapeutic
angiogenesis
Clinical trials Our study
New Vessel Growth
� Two forms of compensatory vessel growth
1. Angiogenesis
2. Arteriogenesis
� Angiogenesis
- sprouting of small endothelial tubes from pre-existing
capillary beds in response to local hypoxia
- the formation of a capillary network
→ small capillaries with diameter of 10-20µm
→ cannot sufficiently compensate for a large occluded artery
New Vessel Growth
� Arteriogenesis
- arterio-arterial collateral connections increase in size and
diameter with increased endothelial shear stress and
circulating monocyte
- increased collateral growth
→ restores blood flow 4 to 6 weeks after initial occlusion of
the large artery
New Vessel Growth
Angiogenesis & Arteriogenesis
Inadequate for restoring the flow
in a large number of patients
Therapeutic Angiogenesis
� Therapeutic angiogenesis
- enhance natural angiogenesis by the administration of
stem cells or gene
- lead to pain relief and wound healing by the development
of collateral vessels
� Two types of stem cell
1. embryonic stem cell
2. adult stem cell
(수정란) (배반포)
(낭배)
� Embryonic stem cell
- differentiate into multiple cellular lineages
Therapeutic Angiogenesis
� 문제점- 암 발생- 개체 복제- 윤리적 문제
Therapeutic Angiogenesis
� Adult stem cell
- peripheral blood, bone marrow, cord blood, placenta
- easily and safely harvested for isolation
- cell; mononuclear cell,
multipotent adult precursor cell(MAPC)
hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)
endothelial progenitor cell (EPC)
Therapeutic Angiogenesis
Clinical Trials
Tateishi-Yuyama et al. Lancet 2002;360:427-35
Fadini et al. Atherosclerosis 2010;209:10-17.
� Most clinical trials using BM or PB mononuclear cells
1. isolation & culture of mononuclear cell
→ complex and expensive
2. danger of contamination
3. risk of the removal of the unknown positive cells
or growth factors
� Our assumption
1. unknown cells and growth factors in whole BM
→ promote angiogenesis
2. autologous whole BM transplantation
→ induce angiogenesis for ischemic limbs
Our Study
� Animal studies (2002 ~)
- whole bone marrow stem cell
- bone marrow derived mononuclear cell
- bone marrow derived MSC
- cord blood derived MNS
- cord blood derived MSC
- adipose tissue derived MSC
� Clinical studies (2004 ~)
- autologous whole bone marrow stem cell
1) fenestration of tibia
2) aspiration from iliac bone
- Mongrel dog : male, 20-25 ㎏
- femoral artery; occluded with ameroid constrictor
� Animal study(1)
- chronic ischemic limb model
- 20ml whole bone marrow from femur
Ameroid Constrictor Size
Swelling Time (days)
0 5 10 15 20 25
Inner Diameter(mm)
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
Superficial femoral artery : after 8 weeks
� Method
- inject BM stem cells into the ischemic hind limb muscle
- primary end-point
; angiogenic effect 8 weeks after stem cell injection
1. angiography
2. number of capillary endothelial cells
� Result
- right limb; control limb (20ml of normal saline)
- left limb; 20ml autologous whole bone marrow stem cell
Journal of Korean Society of Vascular Surgery 2005;21(2): 113-117.
� Clinical study(2)
- patients with Buerger’s disease
- autologous whole bone marrow stem cell implantation
with tibial fenestration technique
Tibia Fibula
� Study protocol
� Patient demographics
- total 27 patients ( 34 limbs);
26 male (33 limbs) / 1 female (1 limb)
- mean age : 37.6 ± 6.9 years
- mean follow-up (Mo); 19.1 ± 3.5 (12.4 - 25)
* (A, C, E) : pre-operative status (B, D, F) : post-operative status
* B : +1 D : +2 F : +3 angiogenic status
� Result; angiographic findings
Classification Limbs
+3 2
+2 5
+1 9
0 6
� Result; angiogram in 22 limbs among 34 limbs
� Clinical study(3)
- patients with ASO and TAO who are not candidate for
surgery
- aspiration of whole bone marrow from iliac bone
- inject whole bone marrow stem cell into the ischemic limbs
(tibial fenestration; unable to count the number of stem cells
- period; July 2004 to June 2009
- 90 ischemic limbs in 67 patients
- primary end-point; angiographic and clinical outcomes
New classification (2009)
1. angiographic scoring system
2. clinical outcome scoring system
New Vessel Formation(1)
Recanalization of major run-off vessel
New Vessel Formation(2)
Angiogenesis; development of new vessel
New Vessel Formation(3)
Arteriogenesis; increased diameter
2 1 0 -1 -2
Recanlization
of major run-off
vessel
≥ 50% segmental
recanalization in
previous length of
major run-off vessel
≤ 50% segmental
recanalization in
previous length
ofmajor run-off
vessel
No change
of major
run-off
vessel
extent
≤ 50%
progressionof
occlusion in
previous length of
major run-off
vessel
≥ 50% progression
of occlusion in
previous length of
major run-off vessel
Angiogenesis Development of
first order collateral
vessel(s)
Development of
more than second
order collateral
vessel(s)
No change
of overall
collateral
extent
Loss of more
thansecond order
collateral vessel(s)
Loss of first order
collateral vessel(s)
Arteriogenesis Increased diameter
and length of
existing collateral
vessel(s)
Increased diameter
or length of
existing collateral
vessel(s)
No change
of overall
collateral
extent
Decreased
diameteror length
of preexisting
collateral vessel(s)
Decreased
diameter and length
of existing collateral
vessel(s)
Angiographic outcomes defined as “aggravated”, “no change”, and “improved” by
cut-off value ‘0’ and ‘1’ showing statistically significant change of the sum of each
category
� Angiographic scoring system
Aggravated No change Improved
Claudication � Statistically significant
decrease of pain-free walking
distance
� Development of new ischemic
lesion
�Any amputation
� No statistically
significant change
of pain-free
walking distance
� Statistically significant increase
of pain-free waling distance
� Return to normal activity
Rest pain � Development of new ischemic
lesion
�Any amputation
� No change of rest
pain
� Relief of rest pain
Tissue loss � Any amputation due to
aggravation of initial wound or
after planned debridement of
non-viable tissue
� Development of new ischemic
lesion
� No change of
wound
� Complete healing of initial
wound or after planned debride-
ment of non-viable tissue
� Clinical outcome scoring system
� Patient demographics
- 90 ischemic limbs with 67 patients
- mean age: 39.8 ± 7.9 years
- mean follow-up period: 29.3 ± 18.1 months
- symptoms
1. intermittent claudication : 44 limbs
2. critical limb ischemia : 46 limbs
� Result; angiographic outcome (n=37)
- recanalization of the run-off vessels: 3 limbs (8.1%)
- angiogenesis; 16 limbs (43.2%)
- arteriogenesis; 15 limbs (40.5%)
Rates of angiographic improvement : 43.2 %
Pre
stem cell therapy
Post
stem cell therapy
� Result; clinical improvement-55.6%
� Result; amputation free rate
� Therapeutic angiogenesis can be new
therapeutic strategy for PAD.
� Autologous whole BM stem cells transplantation
is a safe, effective method for inducing
therapeutic angiogenesis in patient with PAD
Conclusion