-
38/2
4-7. IX 2008.
, 2009.
-
,
.
, ,
.
1
, 1:
, . , ,
; -
, , , .
, , ;
. -
,
.
: ,
, ,
,
, , , .
, -
-
-
,
,
,
,
1 . . . , , , 1975, , 105139.
821.163.41.09 10/17
-
6
. , , -
, ,
,
, -
, . , , -
, , ,
,
. ,
.
2
2
, ,
,
XV (1447) (1493).
, ,
: 1392. -
, XV -
3. -
, , ( )4.
,
, 1304.
, , ,
5,
.
, , -
XII , ,
XIII XIV , ,
.
,
, ,
/ -
. , ,
,
, ,
, , -
, .6
2 P. Skok, Etimologijski rjenik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika,
JAZU, Zagreb, 1973, s. v. vitez.3 . , , 1999, 83.4 . , , , -
, 1994, 2. , 536.5 , . , 84.6 , . 2, -, 1970, 19.
-
7
IV , -
,
, : ,
, ,
, ,
.
,
7.
, ,
, .8
, ,
, ,
9, . -
,
, 1435,
, . -
, ,
10, . -
-
, ,
,
.
, -
,
, ,11
.
,
, , XV .
, 1408. -
, 24 ,
. .
.12
7 . . , , , . , 438.
8 , . , 8384.9 .10 , . 2, . , 19: ,
, .11 , : . ,
, , 1954, 289: , -, (= , ) .
12 , . 3, . , 243: , () : .
-
8
1412, ,
13,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, .14 .
.15
.
, -
, -
, ,
, : , -
,
, , ;
, ; -
: , ;
, .
, , ,
.
3
, -
, , . ,
, ,
, -
, ,
, . ars amatoria, -
-
, .
,
,
. ,
, -
, , ,
, -
13 : . . , , , : , . 13, -, , 1993, 83.
14 .15 . , , 3, .
, 243.
-
9
, ,16 -
, ,
, . , ,
, ,
, -
. -
,
,
: , , . . -
, ,
,
.
, ,
,
, : ,
.
,
.17 -
.
,
, .
, -
.
: ,
, -
.18
.
, , -
. ,
,,
., , ,
, ,
.
,
ars amatoria, :
, ,
, .19
, ,
16 . , , 1966, 108: , (...), ...
17 . , . 1, . , 336.18 . Antologija stare srpske knjievnosti,
Beograd, 1960, 16 (prir. ore Sp. Radojii).19 . , . 1, . , 3233.
-
10
, 20
.
,
.
, , ,
, , .
, ,
, .
,
.
,
, -
, , , ,
, 21, -
-
.
22, , , 12
, , , ,
.
/ ,
, ,
.
. ( -
, , ), (,
,/ )
(, , ,/
).
: , , . ,
, -
, .
-
, , ,
.
***
, -
, -
, . ,
, ,
20 . , . , 111.21 . -, ,
, . , 487.22 . . , . , -
, . , 160162.
-
11
. ,
,
, , .23
, ars amatoria -
, ,
, ,
, . ,
, ,
.
. -
, -, ,
. , ,
. , ,
: .
, -
. , -,
. - , ,
, .
,
,
, ( ,
, );
, ,
,
, , ,
. , ,
,
.
: , , ,
, , , .
23 . . , . , 217: . , .
-
12
Branko Letic
CHIVALRIC STORY IN OLD SERBIAN LITERATURE
(Summary)
It is interesting fact that in Serbian medieval literature there
are no chivalric stories although the
courtly life and social hierarchy, where important part was
played by military nobles and foreign mer-
cenaries, provided subject for its development. The testimonies
about popularity of the literary form,
despite the attempts of the ofcial church to repress it as a
less valuable and even harmful reading for
youth, are the elements of the chivalric codex, typical for
west-European romances, in the origi-
nal medieval writings. They are, logically, most evident in the
writings taken from the other cultures
adapted for domestic public, courtly nobles who were preparing
for the life of medieval feudal nobles
or soldiers. This matter was explicitly discussed: piece of
writing like Aleksandrida, abundant with
successful battles of the conquerors, was made for those who
were preparing for battles. They were
supposed to learn ght disciplines as well as chivalric behaviour
typical for the noblemen. The task of
the literature was to provide the best examples for that.
That literature, apart from didactical one, had its amusing
side: that is why, at least in the West,
it has a lot of romantic stories in the forms of conventional
chivalric love between a knight and
a lady. In our patriarchal culture the romantic elements are
diminished or enveloped with the veil of
Christian spiritual love.
