58
Breaker Failure Protection 33 rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager – Relay Application Innovation, Inc. Adjunct Professor – Washington State University [email protected]

Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Protection33rd Annual Hands-On Relay SchoolMarch 14-15, 2016

Brent Carper, PE

Engineering Manager – Relay Application Innovation, Inc.Adjunct Professor – Washington State [email protected]

Page 2: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures and Breaker Failures

BF Protection versus BF Relaying

BF Relay Schemes and Logic

Special BF Situations

BF Settings and Timing

Impacts from Changing Technology

Testing and Maintenance of BF Schemes

Primary Reference:

C37.119 -2005 IEEE Guide for Breaker Failure Protection of Power Circuit Breakers

Outline

Page 3: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

What is a Breaker Failure?

Page 4: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures Relay failure

Settings failure

Control system failure

CT/PT failure

Battery system failure

Catastrophic control house failure (fire)

Breaker Failures Fails to trip

Trips too slow

Fails to interrupt fault current

Fails to interrupt load current

Flashover when open

Fails to close

Auxiliary contact problems

Catastrophic failure

Protection Failure

Page 5: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures and Breaker Failures

BF Protection versus BF Relaying

BF Relay Schemes and Logic

Special BF Situations

BF Settings and Timing

Impacts from Changing Technology

Testing and Maintenance of BF Schemes

Outline

Page 6: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

T A B

Page 7: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

T A B

Page 8: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

T A B

Page 9: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

T A B

Page 10: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Advantages:

Simple – No extra equipment

Simple – No risk of misoperation

Ultimate protection. Covers ALL failures, not just Breaker Failure (failure of breaker, relay, settings, controls and wiring, battery, etc.)

Disadvantages:

Slow

May not be possible for the backup relaying at [A] to see all faults

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

Conclusions:

Common practice for Distribution, but typically not sufficient for Transmission.

There is “Breaker Fail Protection” even though there is not “Breaker Fail Relaying”.

Breaker failure protection is built-in to good protection practices.

T A B

Page 11: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

T A B

T

2

3

4

5

M

1

Page 12: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

[A] can probably back up [B] and see a minimum fault all the way at the end of the line.

[M] may not be able to fully back up the feeder breakers for an end of line fault.

Example: Assume 200A load per feeder section, and 800A minimum fault current at the end of line.

[A] has 400A max load and needs to pickup on an 800A fault.

[M] has 1000A max load, so it cannot be set to pickup on an 800A fault.

Breaker Failure Protection by Coordination

T A B

T

2

3

4

5

M

1

Page 13: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 14: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Proper Clearing

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 15: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Proper Clearing

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 16: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 17: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Breaker Failure

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 18: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Breaker Failure

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 19: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Remote Backup

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 20: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Remote Backup

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Advantages:

Complete ly independent o f Substat ion B .

Disadvantages:

S low – system instab i l i ty

S low – vo l tage d ips

Wide area outage

May not be poss ib le for the backup re lay to see a l l fau l ts

Page 21: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 22: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Breaker Failure Relaying

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 23: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Breaker Failure Relaying

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

Page 24: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

IEEE Example – Breaker Failure Relaying

1A 2 5

3

7 8

4

6 C

Load

Load

Load

A

B C

BFR on breaker [3] detects breaker failure condition

BFR trips a Lockout relay

Lockout relay (86) tr ips breakers [2], [5], and [7]

Lockout relay blocks close of [2], [5], and [7]

What else?

Transfer Trip to breaker [4]

Cancel reclose of [4]

Page 25: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures and Breaker Failures

BF Protection versus BF Relaying

BF Relay Schemes and Logic

Special BF Situations

BF Settings and Timing

Impacts from Changing Technology

Testing and Maintenance of BF Schemes

Outline

Page 26: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Relaying

21

Z1

50

62

86BF

21

Z2

87B

86B

BFI

21

Z2

67

G

67

G

01

trip all

bkrs on bus

trip all

adjacent bkrs

DTT/RC to

remote bkrs

Page 27: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Relaying

21

P

50

62

86BF

21

B87B

86BBFIBFI

BF

I

Page 28: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

BREAKER FAILURE RELAYING

21

B

87B

21

P

21

B

21

P

87B

BF

1

BF

2

BF

3

1 2 3

Page 29: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Example Logic: BE1-50BF

Page 30: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

1. Basic Breaker Failure Scheme

2. 50BF Torque Control

3. Breaker Re-Trip Logic

4. BFI Control Timer

5. BFI Seal-In

6. Minimal Current Scheme

7. Timer Bypass Scheme

8. Dual Timer Scheme

9. Special Schemes

Breaker Failure Logic

Page 31: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – Basic

Four Parts to a Breaker Failure Scheme: Fault Detector (50BF) or other Failure Detectors

Initiator Circuit (BFI)

Logic and Timers (62)

Output Circuit (BFT)

Page 32: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – 50BF Torque Control

50BF Torque Control: BFI is timed; current is checked once

Prevents chattering or restart of the timer due to 50BF 50BF can be Fault Detector, Load Current Detector, or Low Current Detector

Page 33: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – Re-Trip

Retrip is common for dual trip coil breakers

Timer 62-1 set differently depending on the scheme strategy Example: retrip with alarm

Timer 62-2 always greater than 62-1 Example: 3 cycle breaker, 62-1 retrip and alarm at 5 cycles, 62-2 BFT at 10 cycles

Page 34: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – BFI Control Timer

BFI Control Timer creates a “window” for Breaker Failure Prevents misoperations due to an erroneous BFI when used with fault detector 50BF

Can alarm on CTRL time out

CTRL always greater than 62-2

Page 35: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – BFI Seal-In

BFI Seal-In may be necessary when the BFI signal is momentary Can only be used when there is a BFI Control Timer (CTRL)

May conflict with retrip strategy

Page 36: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – Minimal Current Scheme

“a-finger breaker fail” Examples: Transformer Sudden Pressure Trip; Generator Inadvertent Energization

Relay Techs Beware! These schemes commonly make relay techs famous!

Page 37: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Breaker Failure Logic – Timer Bypass Scheme

Note: This logic is for illustrative purposes only. Not intended as a complete scheme. The timer bypass scheme should be supervised by a fault detector, which may not be compatible with torque controlled 50BF.

Page 38: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Use fast BF timer for multi-phase faults (L-L, L-L-G, 3P)

Use slower BF timer for single-phase faults (SLG)

Multi-phase faults have larger impact on system stability and may require fast breaker failure times.

But Single-phase faults are more common.

Dual timer allows fast BFT for the multi-phase fault,but keeps the security of a slower BFT for the most common fault .

Breaker Failure Logic – Dual Timer Schemes

Page 39: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Voltage differential

Frame leakage detection

Breaker differential

IPO breakers

Redundant breakers

Special Schemes

Page 40: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures and Breaker Failures

BF Protection versus BF Relaying

BF Relay Schemes and Logic

Special BF Situations

BF Settings and Timing

Impacts from Changing Technology

Testing and Maintenance of BF Schemes

Outline

Page 41: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Logic

Fault or Load Current Detector Pickup

Other Breaker Failure Detectors

Set Timers

Breaker Failure Relay Settings

Page 42: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Calculating Breaker Failure Timers

MARGIN

BF TIMERSETTING

CONTROL TIMERSETTING

REMOTE END BACKUP BREAKEROPERATE TIME

TTCHANNEL

TIME

BFROUTPUT

RELAYTIME

50FDP/U

BFIINPUT

P/U

MA

X C

RIT

ICA

L C

LEA

RIN

G T

IME

BY

CO

MP

AN

Y P

OLI

CY

CR

ITIC

AL

CLE

AR

ING

TIM

EC

ALC

ULA

TED

BY

STU

DY

86BFOPERATE

TIME

LOCAL BACKUP BREAKEROPERATE TIME

FAU

LT

PROTECTIVE RELAYOPERATE TIME

BREAKEROPERATE TIME

NORMAL CLEARING TIME

50FDRESET

PR

OP

ER O

PER

ATI

ON

FAU

LT C

LEA

RED

Normal Operation (above the axis)

Breaker Failure Operation (below the axis)

Page 43: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Calculating Breaker Failure Timers

MARGIN

BF TIMERSETTING

CONTROL TIMERSETTING

REMOTE END BACKUP BREAKEROPERATE TIME

TTCHANNEL

TIME

BFROUTPUT

RELAYTIME

50FDP/U

BFIINPUT

P/U

MA

X C

RIT

ICA

L C

LEA

RIN

G T

IME

BY

CO

MP

AN

Y P

OLI

CY

CR

ITIC

AL

CLE

AR

ING

TIM

EC

ALC

ULA

TED

BY

STU

DY

86BFOPERATE

TIME

LOCAL BACKUP BREAKEROPERATE TIME

FAU

LT

PROTECTIVE RELAYOPERATE TIME

BREAKEROPERATE TIME

NORMAL CLEARING TIME

50FDRESET

PR

OP

ER O

PER

ATI

ON

FAU

LT C

LEA

RED

Normal Operation (above the axis)

Breaker Failure Operation (below the axis)

Page 44: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures and Breaker Failures

BF Protection versus BF Relaying

BF Relay Schemes and Logic

Special BF Situations

BF Settings and Timing

Impacts from Changing Technology

Testing and Maintenance of BF Schemes

Outline

Page 45: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Digital Relay BF Protection: Faster, Better, Cheaper, More Solved transient stability problems previously unsolvable

Better protection against wide-area and cascading outages

Protect against all breaker failure modes, not just one or two

Can be more secure if designed well

Most utilities moving away from Stand-Alone BF Relays Some utilities (not many) are reversing the trend and going back to stand

alone Breaker Failure Relays

• Reduce misoperations “unscheduled maintenance tests”

• Use longer maintenance cycles for BF protection systems

Impact of Changing Technology

Page 46: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

P

50

62

86BF

21

B87B

86BBFIBFI

BF

I

Page 47: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

P

BF

86BF

21

B87B

86BBFIBFI

BF

I

Page 48: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

P

BF

86BF

21

B87B

86BBFI

BF

I

BF

BF

I

Page 49: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

P

BF

86BF

21

B87B

86BBFI

BFI

BF

Page 50: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

P

BF

86BF

21

B87B

86B

BFI

BF

I

BF

BF

I

BF

Page 51: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

B

87B

21

P

21

B

21

P

87B

BF

1

BF

2

BF

3

1 2 3

Page 52: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Impact of Changing Technology

21

B

87B

21

P

21

B

21

P

87B

BF

1

1 2 3

BF

1

BF

3

BF

2

BF

2

BF

2

BF

2

BF

3

BF

3

BF

1

Page 53: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Digital Relay Timing and Logic Precise timing eliminates relay misoperations due to calibration drift

Precise timing and logic allows reducing “design margins”

Digital Relay I/O Sensitive BFI inputs (transients, DC grounds)

Solid state relay outputs (sneak circuits)

Digital Relay Protective Elements Used to be limited to a 50FD (fault detector)

Now we can use 50L and other sensitive detectors that may pick up a lot

Solution: Consider using other elements to help add Security, not just Sensitivity(negative sequence, voltage elements, synch check and frequency elements, etc.)

Impact of Changing Technology

Page 54: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Challenges from Complexity Elaborate/exotic BF logic

Wide variety of BF schemes, even in the same model of relay at the same utility

May have more than one BF scheme in a single relay

May have more than one BF scheme for single breaker

Solution: Engineering Standardization

Solution: Documentation (written setting descriptions, logic diagrams, and test plans)

Challenges with Integrated BF May not be able to disable all BFI’s

May not be able to disable all BFT’s

Trend is to completely eliminate all hardwired BFT and lockout relays (IEC 61850)

Solution: Design with test switch to relay input that disables the BFI and/or BFT. Especially important for BFTT or 61850.

Impact of Changing Technology

Page 55: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Protection System Failures and Breaker Failures

BF Protection versus BF Relaying

BF Relay Schemes and Logic

Special BF Situations

BF Settings and Timing

Impacts from Changing Technology

Testing and Maintenance of BF Schemes

Outline

Page 56: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Testing and Maintenance of BF Protection

Challenges with BF Protection Difficult to test intentionally

Easy to test unintentionally

Page 57: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Testing and Maintenance of BF Protection

Many utilities perform maintenance testing of the BF Relay, but are not testing the entire Breaker Failure Protection System

Good maintenance practices (and NERC compliance requirements) are to test the Protection System: Maintenance program for the BF Relay

Maintenance program for CTs/PTs

Maintenance program for the Battery and DC system

Maintenance of the BF Protection System must include:

• Rolling lockout relays and tripping breakers

• Best practice: simultaneous functional test (clear the bus)

• Typical practice: send in the new guy to check the BF relay, and you’ll probably get a complete functional test!

Page 58: Breaker Failure Protection - etouches · PDF fileBreaker Failure Protection 33rd Annual Hands-On Relay School March 14-15, 2016 Brent Carper, PE Engineering Manager –Relay Application

Thank You

Brent Carper, PEEngineering Manager – Relay Application Innovation, Inc.Adjunct Professor – Washington State [email protected]

509-334-9138