Busmhr 4490 Pp

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    1/20

    Cola Wars ContinueMichelle Anderson, Stacey Blunt, Jennifer Brandeberry

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    2/20

    Manufacturing Process

    Concentrate Producers

    Blend raw materialingredients

    Diet CSDs (carbonated soft

    drinks), concentrate makersadd artificial sweeteners Package mixture into plastic

    canisters Sip containers to bottlers

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    3/20

    Bottlers Purcase concentrate !dd carbonated water and

    ig"fructose corn s#rup Bottle or can product Deli$er to customer accounts

    Manufacturing Process

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    4/20

    Competiti$e %orces " ConcentratBusiness

    Bargaining Power of

    Suppliers

    Concentrate re&uiredfew inputs

    Threat of New

    ntrants

    Coke ' Pepsi claimed* of +S CSD sales

    $olume in -

    Threat of Su

    .ealt"coconsum

    Bargaining

    Buye

    Bottlers abargaining

    !i"alry

    A#ong

    ConcentrateProducers

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    5/20

    Competiti$e %orces " BottlingBusiness

    !i"alry

    A#ongBottlers

    Bargaining Power ofSuppliers

    Concentrate is te maincost component to bottling

    process

    Threat of New ntrants

    Bottler refrancising in/-0s diminised treat of

    new entrants

    Bargaining

    Buye

    1etail sector callows comp

    2almart to e

    press

    Threat of Sub

    Bottlers frustgrowt of no

    popular

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    6/20

    Profitabilit#

    Concentrate $ndustry

    3ittle capital " large plants 4"/million

    Most significant costs5ad$ertising, promotion, market

    researc, bottling support Coke and Pepsi old * ofmarket

    Brand recognition

    Bottling $ndus

    ! lot of capital " plantundreds of millions

    Main costs5 concentrs#rup

    %rancise contracts5 business can decide bottlers can not carr#competing brands

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    7/20

    Concentrate industry #ore profitable due to supplier power Cola wars weakened small, independent bottlers

    6 More mone# spent on ad$ertising, product and packagingproliferation,and retail price discounting " iger capitalre&uirements and lower profit margins

    7xibit 45

    6 1etail price per case continuousl# decreasing8 /-005 9/:- per case8 -5 9:-0 per case

    6 Concentrate price per case continuousl# increasing8 /-005 9:- per case8 -5 9/:;4 per case

    Profitabilit# cont:::

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    8/20

    Profitabilit# cont:::

    Bottlers operating profits muc less compared to concentrate po 7xibit

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    9/20

    Supplier Power @umber of suppliers5 few large concentrate producers

    o Coke (>/:-* -), Pepsi (-:-* -), Dr Pepper Snap-), Ater (//:0* -)

    Sie of supplierso Coke and Pepsi claimed * of +:S: CSD market " a$e o Pepsi5 ac&uisition of PB and Pepsi!mericas (0* operao Coke5 ac&uisition of CC7=s @ort !merican operations (-

    operations) !bilit# to substitute

    o @o oter compan#=s a$e same amount of market sare orecognition as Coke and Pepsi

    Cost of cangingo

    3ose a lot of market sareo Product uni&ueness

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    10/20

    Competiti$e Spirit Ef te Coca"Cola Compan# didn=t exist, we=d pra# for someone to in$e

    1oger 7nrico, %ormer C7A of Pepsi

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    11/20

    Ge 2ar 2it @o Blood

    Competitiono 2itout Pepsi, Coke would a$e a toug time being an orili$el# competitor and inno$ator

    o Ge true winner of tis war is te consumer

    Endustr# rowto

    /- Consumption of CSDs 5 a$erage < gallonsH#earo !$erage consumption grew %& per yearfor te ne't threo Coincidence or B#product of te Cola 2arsI

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    12/20

    Staggering %acts

    Gimelineo Carefull# 2aged Competiti$e StruggleF

    rowto !nnual 1e$enue rowt of around ()& per yearo

    Constant +:S: and 2orldwide CSD consumption growt

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    13/20

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    14/20

    1ipple 7ffects cont::: rowt of Coke and Pepsi put a s&ueee on smaller concentra

    producerso Self space declined " small brands continuousl# canging

    Bottler consolidation made smaller concentrate producers incredependent on te Pepsi and Coke bottling networkso

    DPS in response formed its own bottler

    .ealt concerns about te effects of CSD consumption

    Smaller brands a$e slowl# been grabbing more market sareo 7xibit

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    15/20

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    16/20

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    17/20

    More recentl#::: Pepsi=s stock up />* compared to ?ust * for Coke " w#I

    o Pepsi owns te %rito"3a# snack business %ood business grew at a iger rate compared to be$

    businesso Strong results from 3atin !merica and !siao Pepsi is ceaper

    Grades at /-N /4 earnings forecast compared to C B+G Pepsi=s expecting earnings to grow * annuall# onl# expects to grow >:;* annuall# (according to ana

    Best performing be$erage stock " Dr Pepper Snappleo Sares up nearl#

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    18/20

    @ew Cola 2arsI Coca"Cola 3ife5

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    19/20

    KuestionsI

  • 7/21/2019 Busmhr 4490 Pp

    20/20

    2orks Cited ttp5HHmone#:cnn:comH/>H/HHnewsHcompaniesHcoke"pepsi

    ttp5HHmone#:cnn:comH/>H/H-Hin$estingHpepsi"earnings"stoc

    1otaermel, %rank G: Strategic Management: nd ed: @ew or.ill Erwin, /