Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    1/47

    21

    Leasing and Other

    Asset-Based

    Financing

    Corporate Financial Management 3e

    Emery Finnerty StoweModified for course use by Arnold R. Cowan

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    2/47

    1

    Lease Financing

    A lease is a rental agreement that extends for one

    year or longer.

    The owner of the asset (the lessor) grantsexclusive use of the asset to the lessee for a fixed

    period of time.

    In return, the lessee makes fixed periodic payments to

    the lessor.

    At termination, the lessee may have the option to

    either renew the lease or purchase the asset.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    3/47

    2

    Types of Leases

    Full-service lease

    Lessor responsible for maintenance, insurance,

    and property taxes.Net lease

    Lessee responsible for maintenance, insurance,

    and property taxes.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    4/47

    3

    Types of Leases

    Operating lease

    short-term

    may be cancelable

    Financial lease

    long-term

    similar to a loan agreement

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    5/47

    4

    Types of Lease Financing

    Direct leases

    Sale-and-lease-back agreements

    Leveraged leases

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    6/47

    5

    Direct Lease

    LesseeManufacturer

    / LessorLease

    Lessee LessorLease Sale of AssetManufacturer

    / Lessor

    or

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    7/47

    6

    Sale-and-Lease-Back

    Sale of Asset

    Lease

    Lessee Lessor

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    8/47

    7

    Leveraged Lease

    LenderLien

    Equity

    Investor

    LesseeLease

    Single

    Purpose

    Leasing

    Company

    ManufacturerSaleofA

    sset

    Equity

    Loan

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    9/47

    8

    Synthetic Leases

    Firms have used synthetic leases to get theuse of assets but keep debt off their balance

    sheets.An unrelated financial institution investssome equity and sets up a special-purpose-entity that buys the assets and leases it to

    the firm under an operating lease.Since the Enron bankruptcy, firms havebeen reluctant to use synthetic leases.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    10/47

    9

    Enrons Murky Deals

    Lending

    Group

    Equity

    Investor

    Enron

    Partnership

    or Special

    PurposeEntity

    Enron used outside

    partnerships to move assets

    off its balance sheet and

    monetize assets. But the

    company was deeplyinvolved with funding

    those partnerships.

    Enron sells assets, gets

    debt off the balance

    sheet and recognizes a

    gain on the sale.

    Outside investors inject

    at least 3% of the

    funding so that Enron

    doesnt have to claim it

    as a subsidiary.

    1

    3Enron provided some or

    all of the 3%.

    Banks provided the

    other 97% of thefinancing.

    45Enron guarantees the loan.

    Sometimes with now-

    worthless Enron shares.

    2

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    11/47

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    12/47

    11

    Enrons Partnerships

    As a result, any debt incurred by thepartnership could be kept off the company's

    balance sheet.As an added bonus, Enron often recognizeda gain on the sale of the assets.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    13/47

    12

    Why did Enron want debt off their

    balance sheet?

    The simple answer is that Enron feared that

    too much debt would damage its credit

    rating.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    14/47

    13

    Why did Enron want debt off their

    balance sheet?

    A more complex answer lies with agency costs.

    Enron executives headed and partly owned

    some of the partnerships, which provided a hugesource of outside income for those involved.

    Enrons former CFO, Andrew Fastow, made more

    than $30 million from two partnerships that he ran.

    If you were a shareholder in a SPE buying an

    asset from your employer, where would your

    loyalties lie?

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    15/47

    14

    How Widespread Was This at Enron?

    There were hundreds, and perhaps even

    thousands, of these partnerships.

    The exact number isn't known.In all, Enron had about 3,500 subsidiaries

    and affiliates, many of them limited

    partnerships and limited-liabilitycompanies, which are a sort of hybrid

    between corporations and partnerships.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    16/47

    15

    How Did They Get Away With It?

    The company and its board of directors

    claimed that allowing executives to be

    involved with the outside partnerships gaveit the advantage of speed.

    Enron claimed that it set up safeguards to

    protect itself, but in retrospect they wereclearly inadequate.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    17/47

    16

    Advantages of Leases

    Efficient use of tax deductions and tax credits ofownership

    Reduced risk

    Reduced cost of borrowing

    Bankruptcy considerations

    Tapping new sources of funds

    Circumventing restrictions debt covenants

    off-balance sheet financing

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    18/47

    17

    Disadvantages of Leasing

    Lessee forfeits tax deductions associated

    with asset ownership.

    Lessee usually forgoes residual asset value.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    19/47

    18

    Valuing Financial Leases

    Basic approach is similar to debt refunding.

    Lease displaces debt.

    Missed lease payments can result in the lessor claiming the asset.

    filing lawsuits.

    forcing firm into bankruptcy.

    Risk of a firms lease payments are similar to

    those of its interest and principal payments.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    20/47

    19

    Equivalent Ways to Analyze

    Net Advantage to Leasing (NAL) approach:

    Lease if

    NAL > 0.The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) approach:

    Lease if

    IRR of leasing < after-tax cost of debtfinancing.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    21/47

    20

    Leases Analysis Example

    The Emerson Co. needs the use of a special

    purpose stamping machine for the next 10

    years.The machine costs $6 million, has a life of

    10 years, and a salvage value of $300,000.

    Emerson can lease this machine from theGeneral Supply Co. for 10 years, with annual

    year-end lease payments of $1.05 million.

    Emersons tax rate is 40%.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    22/47

    21

    Leases Analysis Example

    If Emerson were to buy the machine, it

    would finance 80% of the purchase price with

    a 11.5% secured installment loan, with theremainder being borrowed as unsecured

    installment debt at 14% interest.

    The after-tax required return on the asset is15%.

    Evaluate this leasing opportunity.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    23/47

    22

    Leasing Displaces Borrowing

    Suppose initially that the Emerson Co. has net

    assets worth $50 million, and a debt ratio of

    50%. Compute the debt ratio if Emerson uses:

    Conventional financing for the stamping

    machine.

    Leases the stamping machine. How

    would the target debt ratio be restored?

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    24/47

    23

    Leasing Displaces Borrowing

    InitialCapitalization

    Conventional Debt

    Financial LeaseObligation

    Total Debt

    EquityTotal

    $ 25 M

    $ 0 M$25 M

    $25 M$50 M

    Debt Ratio 50%

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    25/47

    24

    Leasing Displaces Borrowing

    ConventionalFinancing

    Conventional Debt

    Financial LeaseObligation

    Total Debt

    EquityTotal

    $ 28 M

    $ 0 M$25 M

    $28 M$56 M

    Debt Ratio 50%

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    26/47

    25

    Leasing Displaces Borrowing

    LeaseFinancing

    Conventional Debt

    Financial LeaseObligation

    Total Debt

    EquityTotal

    $ 2 5 M

    $ 6 M$ 31 M

    $25 M$56 M

    Debt Ratio 5 5.36%

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    27/47

    26

    Leasing Displaces Borrowing

    Debt RatioRestored

    Conventional Debt

    Financial LeaseObligation

    Total Debt

    EquityTotal

    $ 22 M

    $ 6 M$28 M

    $28 M$56 M

    Debt Ratio 50%

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    28/47

    27

    Analyzing Leases

    TheNet Advantage to Leasing(NAL)

    equals the purchase price (P) minus the

    present value of the incremental after-taxcash flows (CFAT) associated with the

    lease.

    NAL =PPV(CFATs)

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    29/47

    28

    Analyzing Leases - the Discount

    Rate

    The discount rate should be the lessees after-taxcost of similarly secured debt.

    Since the lease obligation is not overcollateralized,

    the secured debt rate should reflect this.

    Fully secured means the asset is worth more than25% of the loan.

    $80M loan on $100M asset: $20/$80 = 25%

    Use weighted average of secured and unsecureddebt rates if necessary.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    30/47

    29

    Analyzing Leases - the Cash Flows

    Cost of asset (saving)

    Lease payments (cost)

    Incremental differences in operating andother expenses (cost or savings)

    Depreciation tax shelter (foregone benefit)

    Expected net residual value (foregone

    benefit)

    Investment tax credits (foregone benefit)

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    31/47

    Net Advantage to LeasingD

    t = yeartdepreciation deduction

    DEt= yeartcash expense savings from leasing

    ITC = investment tax credit, if available

    CFt= lease payment in yeart

    N = life of lease (in years)P = purchase price of asset

    r = assets after-tax required return

    r = cost of debt (secured & unsecured)Salvage = net salvage valueT = lessees marginal income tax rate

    '1

    (1 )( )

    (1 (1 ) ) (1 )

    Nt t t

    t Nt

    T CF E TD SalvageNAL P ITC

    T r r

    D

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    32/47

    Net Advantage to Leasing

    We save paying the purchase priceP.We lose the ITC and salvage value.

    We pay the lease payment CF; this may be partlyoffset by savings on operating and other cash

    expenses (E) and by tax deductibility.We lose the depreciation tax shield TD.

    Discount main cash flows at the after-tax cost ofdebt.

    '1

    (1 )( )(1 (1 ) ) (1 )

    N t t t

    t Nt

    T CF E TD SalvageNAL P ITCT r r

    D

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    33/47

    32

    Net Advantage to Leasing

    For the Emerson Co.,

    P= $6 million

    CFt= $1.05 million per year for 10 yearsD

    t= ($6,000,000 - $300,000) / 10 = $570,000

    per year for 10 years

    DEt= 0,ITC= 0 r= 15%

    r = 80%(11.5%) + 20%(14%) = 12.0%

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    34/47

    33

    Net Advantage to Leasing

    '1

    (1 )( )

    (1 (1 ) ) (1 )

    Nt t t

    t Nt

    T CF E TD SalvageNAL P ITC

    T r r

    D

    10

    10

    1 )15.1(

    000,300$

    )12.0)40.01(1(

    000,570$4.0)05.1)($40.1(6$

    tt

    mmNAL

    068,45$NAL

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    35/47

    34

    The IRR Approach

    For Emersons leasing opportunity, the IRR

    is 7.58%.

    The after-tax cost of debt financing is12%(10.40) = 7.20%.

    Since the IRR (the cost of lease financing)

    is greater than the after-tax cost of debtfinancing, Emerson should not lease the

    machine.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    36/47

    35

    Break-Even Lease Payments

    The break-even lease payments can be

    computed by setting the NAL to zero.

    In the case of Emersons lease, the annualbreak-even payments are $1,039,206.

    Since the lease contract calls for payments of

    $1,050,000; the leasing alternative is notpreferred.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    37/47

    36

    NPV of Lease to the Lessor

    In a perfect market with no tax, leasing is a

    zero-sum game.

    The NPV of the lease to the lessor will be- (NAL to the lessee).

    If lessee and lessor have the same marginal

    income tax rates, leasing is still a zero sumgame in an otherwise perfect market.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    38/47

    37

    NPV of Lease to the Lessor

    where T= lessors marginal income tax rate.

    ' '

    Lessor ' '

    1

    (1 )( )

    (1 (1 ) ) (1 )

    Nt t t

    t N

    t

    T CF E T D SalvageNAL P ITC

    T r r

    D

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    39/47

    38

    NPV of Lease to the Lessor

    10

    10

    1

    Lessor)15.1(

    000,300$

    )12.0)40.01(1(

    000,570$4.0)05.1)($40.1(6$

    tt

    mmNAL

    068,45$Lessor NAL

    ' '

    Lessor ' '1

    (1 )( )

    (1 (1 ) ) (1 )

    Nt t t

    t Nt

    T CF E T D SalvageNAL P ITC

    T r r

    D

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    40/47

    39

    Effect of Tax Asymmetries

    Suppose lessees (Emersons) tax rate is

    zero. Also assume that the before-tax

    required return on the asset for the lessee is17.50%.

    The NAL to Emerson is then $7,460.

    The NPV to the lessor is still $45,068.Thus, both parties gain from the leasing

    arrangement.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    41/47

    40

    Tax Treatment of Financial Leases

    IRS has guidelines for distinguishing

    between true leases and

    installment sales agreements. secured loans.

    If lessor meets these guidelines:

    lessor can claim tax deductions and credits ofasset ownership.

    lessee can deduct full amount of lease payment

    for tax purposes.

    id li f i i l

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    42/47

    41

    IRS Guidelines for Financial

    Leases

    Term of lease < 80% of assets useful life.

    Lessor must maintain an equity investment ofat least 10% of assets original cost.

    Exercise price of the purchase option mustequal the assets fair market value at the timethe option is exercised.

    Lessee does not pay any portion of the assetspurchase price.

    Lessor must hold title to the property.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    43/47

    42

    Accounting Treatment of Financial

    Leases

    SFAS 13 requires lessees to capitalize all leases

    that meet any one of the following:

    Lease transfers ownership of asset to lessee beforethe lease expires.

    Lessee has option to purchase asset at a bargain

    price.

    Term of lease is greater than or equal to 75% of

    assets useful economic life.

    PV of lease payments is 90% of asset value.

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    44/47

    43

    Project Financing

    Desirable when

    Project can stand alone as an economic unit.

    Project will generate enough revenue (net ofoperating costs) to service project debt.

    Examples:

    Mines & mineral processing facilities Pipelines

    Oil refineries

    Paper mills

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    45/47

    44

    Project Financing Arrangements

    Completion undertaking

    Purchase, throughput, or tolling agreements

    Cash deficiency agreements

    Ad d Di d f

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    46/47

    45

    Advantages and Disadvantages of

    Project Financing

    Advantages

    Risk sharing

    Expanded debt capacity Lower cost of debt

    Disadvantages

    Significant transaction costs and legal fees

    Complex contractual agreements

    Lenders require a higher yield premium

  • 7/30/2019 Ch21 Asset Based Fing EFS e3

    47/47

    Limited Partnership Financing

    Another form of tax-oriented financing.

    Allows the firm to sell the tax deductions

    and credits associated with asset ownershipto the limited partners.

    Income (or loss) for tax purposes flowsthrough to the partners.

    Limited partners are passive investors.

    General partner operates the limitedpartnership and has unlimited liability.