1
Jinliang Li, Energy Systems Engineering Institute Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015 Chambersburg Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Wind Turbine Motivation Project Objective Pennsylvania Annual Average Wind Speed Map at 80m Chambersburg Chambersburg is a unique smart-grid based self-sufficient electric utility in Pennsylvania. It is a real-world example of how a small utility can be successful. Chambersburg is famous for its low electric price rates and it is time to add another title to Chambersburg, “Green Energy Generation”. In August 3, 2015, President Obama and EPA has announced a new Clean Power Plan, which is requiring a dramatic reducing the Carbon pollution from power plants. So it is a great opportunity to introduce wind power into Chambersburg energy portfolio, which could not only resolve the carbon emission regulation issues but also can expand Chambersburg’s electric generation profile. A Detail Feasibility Study of Wind Turbine installation includes proper turbine models and optimal pole heights A Construction Strategy An Output Study of The Designed Wind Turbine A Financial Estimation of Possible Cost and Payback Period Feasibility Study Conclusion Wind Turbine Nacelle Components Recommended Turbine Model Turbine Construction Strategy 5 m 45 m 40 m Landscape Area = 0.5 x 40m x 45m = 900 m Construction Area = 0.5 x 30m x 35m = 525 m : Construction Point Model Northern Power 60 Designed Life 20 years Rotor Diameter 24.4 meter Tower Type Tubular Steel Monopole Hub Height Rated Wind Speed 11 meter/second Gearbox Type No Gearbox (direct drive) Generator Type Permanent Magnet Controller Type DSP-based Multiprocessor Embedded Platform Converter Type Pulse-width Modulated IGBT Frequency Converter Rated Electrical Power 59.9kw, 3 Phase, 400VAC, 60Hz Power Factor Set point adjustable between 0.9 lagging and 0.9 leading Financially, the project cannot be justified due to the long payback period of time which is about 40 years. It will greatly exceed the wind turbine designed life which is 20 years. The wind turbine may provide other benefits to Chambersburg such as improved public image through green generation and being a new technology adaptor. Annul Power Output Financial Analysis 30 yrs. $235,000 $15,000 $250,000 $10,000 $10,000 $235,000 $225,000 151,077 $0.015 6-10 m/s Supplier Northern Power Systems 29 Pitman Road Barre, Vermont, 05641 USA Hub Height vs. Wind Turbine Power Output 2 2 November 30 th , 2015 Ron Pezon, Rick Blum, Rick Blum,

Chambersburg Poster - DHS (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chambersburg Poster - DHS (1)

Jinliang Li, Energy Systems Engineering Institute

Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015

Chambersburg Renewable Energy

Feasibility Study – Wind Turbine

Motivation Project Objective Pennsylvania Annual Average Wind Speed Map at 80m

Ch

am

bers

bu

rg

Chambersburg is a unique smart-grid

based self-sufficient electric utility in

Pennsylvania. It is a real-world example

of how a small utility can be successful.

Chambersburg is famous for its low

electric price rates and it is time to add

another title to Chambersburg, “Green

Energy Generation”. In August 3, 2015,

President Obama and EPA has

announced a new Clean Power Plan,

which is requiring a dramatic reducing

the Carbon pollution from power plants.

So it is a great opportunity to introduce

wind power into Chambersburg energy

portfolio, which could not only resolve the

carbon emission regulation issues but

also can expand Chambersburg’s electric

generation profile.

① A Detail Feasibility Study of

Wind Turbine installation

includes proper turbine models

and optimal pole heights

② A Construction Strategy

③ An Output Study of The

Designed Wind Turbine

④ A Financial Estimation of

Possible Cost and Payback

Period

Feasibility Study Conclusion

Wind Turbine Nacelle Components

Recommended Turbine Model Turbine Construction Strategy

5 m

45 m

40 m

Landscape Area = 0.5 x 40m x 45m = 900 m

Construction Area = 0.5 x 30m x 35m = 525 m

: Construction Point

Model Northern Power 60

Designed Life 20 years

Rotor Diameter 24.4 meter

Tower Type Tubular Steel Monopole

Hub Height 29 meter

Rated Wind Speed 11 meter/second

Gearbox Type No Gearbox (direct drive)

Generator Type Permanent Magnet

Controller TypeDSP-based Multiprocessor Embedded

Platform

Converter TypePulse-width Modulated IGBT

Frequency Converter

Rated Electrical Power 59.9kw, 3 Phase, 400VAC, 60Hz

Power FactorSet point adjustable between 0.9

lagging and 0.9 leading

• Financially, the project cannot be justified due to the long payback period of time which is about 40 years. It will greatly exceed the wind turbine

designed life which is 20 years.

• The wind turbine may provide other benefits to Chambersburg such as improved public image through green generation and being a new

technology adaptor.

Annul Power Output Financial Analysis

30 yrs.$235,000

$15,000

$250,000

$10,000

$10,000

$235,000

$225,000

151,077

$0.015

6-10 m/s

Supplier

Northern

Power

Systems29 Pitman Road

Barre, Vermont,

05641 USA

Hub Height vs. Wind Turbine Power Output

2

2

November 30th, 2015Ron Pezon,Rick Blum,

Rick Blum,