Upload
mitsuru-aono
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GastroenterologiaJaponica Vol. 21, No. 3 Copyright �9 1986 by The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology Printed in Japan
~ O r i g i n a l A r t i c l e w
C H O L I N E R G I C EFFECTS OF HISTAMINE-H2 RECEPTOR A N T A G O N I S T S P A R T L Y T H R O U G H I N H I B I T I O N
OF ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE
Mitsuru A O N 0 , M.D.* , Motoyuki M O R I G A , M.D.**, Kazuhiko M I Z U T A , M.D.** and
Hiroaki N A R U S A W A , M.D. * *
�9 Department o f Clinical Nutrition and **First Department o f Internal Medicine,
Kyoto University School o f Medicine, Kyoto 606,Japan
Summary
The effects of histamine Hz-receptor antagonists on acetylcholinesterase and pseudocholinesterase ac- tivity were studied. All H• tested inhibi ted both enzyme activities dose-dependently. The potency of inhibi tory activity of H~-antagonists on acetylcholinesterase estimated from median inhib i - tory dose were in the following order of decreasing activity: rani t idine > TZU-0460 > cimetidine > YM- 11170, whereas that on pseudocholinesterase were TZU-0460 > rani t idine > cimetidine > YM-11170.
As the effects derived from the inhibi t ion of acetylcholinesterase by H2-antagonists may affect intesti- nal motility, we studied i leal muscle contractions. Rani t id ine had the most potent st imulating effect on contraction, the pattern of which was similar to physostigmine and was blocked by atropine and mor- phine. YM-11170 had a weak action on muscle contraction and cholinesterase activities.
Key Words: A cetylcholine, Acetylcholinesterase, H2-antagonist, Guinea-pig ileum.
I n t r o d u c t i o n
Several h is tamine H2-receptor antagonists
have been developed and used clinically for the
t r ea tment of pept ic ulcers. They exert powerful
inhibi tory effects on gastr ic acid secretion in
animals and humans . They usually have no
effects on gastrointest inal moti l i ty , however, it
is possible that some of them may affect the
gastr ic empty ing and the lower esophageal
sphincter pressurel-S). Ber taccini et al.1) have
repor ted that ran i t id ine exerts cholinergic-l ike
Received October 11, 1985. Accepted January 13, 1986. Address requests for reprints to: Mitsuru Aono, M.D.,
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Kyoto University School of Medicine,'Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606, Japan.
This study was supported in part by grant from the Japa- nese Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (No. 59570300).
effects. Rani t id ine provokes atropine-sensi t ive
cont rac t ion of smooth muscle p repara t ions of
several different an imal species. There are
some reports4-O tha t c imet id ine and ran i t id ine
inhibi t h u m a n erythrocytes and gastr ic acetyl-
cholinesterase (ACHE) as well as h u m a n se rum
pseudochol inesterase (PChE).
In the present study, the effects of Hg_-
antagonists on A C h E and PChE were ex-
amined . We c o m p a r e d the effects of new H2-
antagonists , TZU-04607) and YM-11170s,*),
with those of c imet id ine and rani t id ine . F rom
the result of ACHE, the effects of H2-antago-
nists on cont rac t ion of the ileal muscle p r epa ra -
t ion were invest igated.
M a t e r i a l s a n d Methods
Cholinesterase assay
214 M..40NO ET AL. Vol. 21, No. 3
Human erythrocyte AChE was obtained
from heparinized blood. The erythrocytes were
washed 5 times with saline and finally resus- pended in distilled water for hemolysis. Assays
were performed after dilution in 0.1 M phos- phate buffer, pH 8.0. Human serum was used
for PChE assay. Cholinesterase activities were measured at
25~ by a spectrophotometric method using acetylthiocholine as a substratel~ In the stan-
dard procedure, to 2 ml of enzyme solution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, 0.8 ml ali- quots of 0.33 mM 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitro- benzoic acid) (DTNB) in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer, pH 7.0 with or without 0.013 mM pro-
fenamine (Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical, Osaka)
as a PChE inhibitor were added. After a 15- rain preincubation at 25~ the reaction was
started by the addition of 0.2 ml of 1 mM
acetylthiocholine. The enzymatic reaction was
determined by the increase of absorbance at wave length 405 nm in a photometer equipped with a chart recorder.
Experiments with histamine-Hz-antagonists and other drugs were carried out by adding 0.5 ml of drug solution that had been diluted with
0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, to 1.5 ml of enzyme solution. Ileal muscle preparation
Male guinea pigs, weighing 300 to 400 g, were killed by a blow on the head, and the ileum was isolated and placed in Tyrode solu-
tion. Tissue specimens about 3 cm in length
were suspended in a 10-ml organ bath with
Tyrode solution kept at 32~ and gassed with
95% 02 and 5% CO2. The Tyrode solution had the following composition (per liter): NaC1, 8.0 g; KCI, 0.2 g, CaC12, 0.2 g; MgCI2,
0.1 g, NaHzPO4, 0.05 g; NaHCO3, 1.0 g and glucose, 1.0 g. Response to drugs were re- corded isotonically under a tension of 1.0 g.
In some experiments ileal longitudinal muscle was gently separated from the under-
lying circular muscle. The dissected muscle strip was stimulated electrically by the method of Patonal). The electrodes were made of plati-
num and an intraluminal electrode was used as the anode. Rectangular pulses of 0.1 msec
duration were used at a frequency of 0.1 Hz
and at a voltage of 5 V. Agents used
Acetylcholine chloride (Daiichi, Tokyo),
morphine hydrochloride (Dainippon, Osaka), physostigmine sulfate (Wako, Osaka), hexa-
methonium chloride (Nakarai, Kyoto), beta-
zole hydrochloride and chlorphenylamine
malate (Shionogi, Osaka), diphenhydramine hydrochloride (Tanabe, Osaka), atropine sul- fate and pyrilamine malate (Sigma, St. Louis,
MO) were used. Cimetidine was a gift from SKF Fujisawa, Tokyo. Ranitidine was a gift
from Glaxo Japan, Tokyo. YM-11170 was a gift from Yamanouchi, Tokyo. TZU-0460 was a gift from Teikokuzoki, Tokyo. The chemical structure of Hz-blockers used are shown in Fig.
1.
Cimetidine
CH= -CH2SCH2CHzNHCNHCH=
I H ~ N N--CmN
Ranit, idine ,•-CH=SCH=CH=NHCNHCH= CHNO=
~NSO=NH= /==~CH=SCH=CH=C,~.NH
Y M - 1 1 1 7 0 ~ 'N ' (Famot.idine)
N=N~ ~N H=N/C
Fig. 1. The chemical structure of the histamine Hz- receptor antagonists used.
June 1986 Cholinergic Effects of H2-blockers 215
Results
Cholinesterase assay Cimetidine inhibited both AChE and PChE
activities in a dose-dependent manner. The
median inhibitory dose (ID-50) was 6.3 x 10-4 M for erythrocyte AChE and 2.6 x 10-3 M for
serum PChE shown in Fig. 4. In order to deter-
mine the type of cholinesterase inhibition by cimetidine and inhibition constant, saturation experiments with increasing substrate concen-
Fig. 2.
trations were carried out. The double recipro- cal plots obtained from the experimental data were linear in all cases examined, as shown in
Fig. 2. Both Km and Vmax were affected by the agent. These results are consistent with an inhibition of the mixed type, which presents characteristics c o m m o n to both competitive
and non-competitive inhibition. The inhibitory constants (Kt) were 1.5 x 10-4 M for AChE
and 1.9 x 10 -4 M for PChE, as calculated by
Dixon-plots. Fig. $ shows that histamine-
ACETYLCHOLINs PSEt,~OCHOLINESTERASE CI~ETI~INE ]oosf 6 10 .5~
Z/v 6.6 lO'4N CIMETIDoIflE DOSE 1/v 6.6 10"4M ~, IO-W~ 1 xlO'r 3. xlO'4N 1'6 10- M
IDIHE( ) 6 10"5M
10" 100
INE( ) 5 j
/ - / ~ / Ii " i ! I 1/10-3 1/10-~ 1/2.5x10-5 1/10-] 1/10-4 1/2.5x10-$ Iv[ "1
(l/S) (l/S)
Inhibition of erythrocyte AChE (left) and serum PChE (right) by cimetidine: double reciprocal plots. Acetylthiocholine in a range of concentrations (S): 0.025-1 mM; was used. V=A absorb- ance/min. The concentration of cimetidine are given at the range from 6.6 x 10- ] to 6.6 x 10- 2 mM. The points on the graph represent the mean values of 3 separate experiments performed in duplicate.
A I-r
50 -
Fig. 8.
loo - o - - ~ t r ~ ~ - ; ~ ~ - - ~ - - +
~ " . " " , ~ . . Hlstid,n. (0) �9 ". ~ Hlstltrnine (&)
�9 " . ".~\ Eetezole (~) \~ ~\ Oiphenhydrarnine
~ ~, on AChE (0) ~ (~ PChE (0)
', ~ Chlorpheflylarnine on AChE (FI)
o., , I{ . . . . . . .
0 i0 -8 i0 -7 i0 -6 10 .5 10 -4 i0 -3 i0 -2
DOSE (MOL)
Inhibition of erythrocyte AChE and serum PChE by histamine-related compounds.
216 M. A O N O E T /IL. Vol. 21, No. 3
100.
50.
Cimetidine
n e
o �9 P ~ O O A O L ~
I() -7 10-* 10 -= 10 -4 10-* 10 -= 10 -~ r oo~ (MOL)
T Z U - 0 4 6 0 ETC't'M( m'rmTY (~)
100 ~--II " ~ ~ m ' r v
50 L ~ SE
0 6 I~_. 10-" 16-" 10-" 1~-' 10-" 1~-" Tzu-o~o oo~ (MOL)
Fig. 4.
% Ranitidine
1
6 I I 16-, lg '-o lo-, 16-" lo-' lo-,
YM-11170 100 o If
0 ~ rt 10~? 10~,
5 0
F ~ t X X ~ 0 t . I ~ S ~
I to'-" 1~" to" 10 ~"
W4-1W/0 ~ OWL)
Inhibitin of erythrocyte AChE and serum PChE by several Hz antagonists. ID-50 of agents on AChE is shown by the dotted line.
related compounds such as histidine, histamine
and betazole hydrochloride, which have an
imidazole ring, had no influence on either cho-
linesterase. Histamine Hi-blocking agents,
such as chlorphenyramine and diphenhydra-
mine, inhibited this activity, especially that of
PChE.
Other Hz antagonists such as ranitidine,
TZU-0460 and YM-11170, also inhibited ac-
tivities of both cholinesterases (Fig. 4). Raniti-
dine was the most potent inhibitor of AChE among them. Its ID-50 was 1.3 x 10-6 M. YM-
11170 was a weak inhibitor of both AChE and
PChE.
Ileal muscle prepara t ion
Acetylcholine (0.05 aM) elicited an immedi-
ate phasic contractile response followed by
tonic contraction, whereas 29 aM of ranitidine
increased contractile activity gradually, and
enhanced acetylcholine-induced contractions
as shown Fig. 5. Cimetidine, TZU-0460 and
YM-11170 at a concentrat ion of 26 and 30/zM
respectively had no effect on acetylcholine-
induced contraction. However, at a concentra-
tion of 300 pM they slightly stimulated the con-
traction; the effect was identical to that seen
with 2.9 aM of ranitidine. Ranitidine and
physostigmine showed similar patterns of con-
traction.
Fig. 6 shows the effect of Hi-antagonists and
atropine sulfate on ranit idine-induced contrac-
tion. Diphenhydramine inhibited the contrac-
tion induced by ranitidine. Another HI-
blocker, pyrilamine, had no effect. The gan-
glionic blocker, hexamethonium, had no effect
on ranit idine-induced contractile activity.
Prior t reatment with morphine abolished the
ranit idine-induced activity. Exogenous acetyl-
choline-induced contractile activity was com-
pletely mainta ined despite the presence of mor-
phine. Fig. 7 shows the effects of H2-antago-
nists on the contract ion of the longitudinal
muscle preparat ion of isolated guinea-pig
ileum using electric field stimulation. H v
June 1986 Cholinergic Effects of H=-blockers 217
Ach Ach Ach Ach
Ranitidine( 29 )
Ach Ach ACh Ach Ach
Cimetidine TZU-OZ,60 ( 40 ) ( 26 )
Ach
Ranitidine ( 2 9 )
Fig. 5.
5 rain.
Omm
t Ranitidine( 29 ) Physostigmine( 0.1z )
Ach Ach Ach Ach Ach
,r
YI,6-11170 ( 3 o ) ( 2 9 )
10mm
J ~anitidine C~metid~r~
( z.9 ) (4o0) (26o)
~ 0mm
I~an~idine ~M -11170 ( z 9 ) (3oo)
Contraction of isolated guinea-pig ileal preparation by H2 antagonists was measured isotonically. ACh: Acetylcholine 0.05 ltM, parentheses indicated the concentration of agents (pM). Asterisks indicate the washing out of incubated solution in the preparation.
.5 rain . .~
Diphenhydramine( 039 ) DPH( 039 ) Pyritamine Pyrilamine [ ~ ( o'~)PH~ ) I ~ ( " Pyrilam~ ) Atropine sulf. (DPH> . 1 * I ( 0.1S ) I (0~) [ ~ * I "'1 ..a~t 0.�88 ,
I ] lOmm
I I I | I | ~anitidine Ranitidine Ranitidine Ranitidine Ranitidine Ach Ach ( ~Z7 ) ( a27 )
Hexarr~thoniumic6( 37 ) , (C6:37 )1
t I Ranitidine Ranitidine
i , , l] I
Ach( 0.05 ) Ranitidine Ranitidine Ach( 0.05 ) Ranitidine Ach( o.os )
Fig. 6. Contraction of isolated ileal preparations by ranitidine. Concentration of ranitidine was 29 ,uM. Contraction by ranitidine was blocked by atropine, diphenhydramine and morphine, but not by hexamethonium or pyrilamine. Parentheses indicate the concentration of agents (,uM). Asterisks indicate the washing out of incubated solution in the preparation.
218 M. A O N O E T .'IL. Vol. 21, No. 3
Fig. 7.
Contraction
%
200" o-- Ranitidine o-- Cimetidine * - TZU-0460
/ o- u
/ / t
100 o ........................................................................................
0 1 '101 102 103 pM
Dose-response contraction of electrically stimulated longitudinal muscle strip (0.1 msec, 0.l Hz, 5 V) by H2-antagonists. Basal contraction is expressed as one hundred percent. Data are presented as mean +- S.E. of five experiments.
antagonists increased the contractile activity
dose-dependently. We compared the contrac- tile action of each H2-antagonists. Basal con- tractile activity was expressed as 100%. Raniti-
dine stimulated the contraction dose-depen- dently, and was 10 times more potent than the
other H2-antagonists. YM-11170 was a very weak stimulant. The highest dose of YM- 11170
used did not elicite a further increase of con-
tractile activity.
D i s c u s s i o n
The present study demonstrated that AChE and PChE were inhibited by H2-receptor antagonists. Ranitidine is the most potent in- hibitor of AChE among the H2-antagonists ex- amined. A previous observation s J2) that the
anticholinesterase activity of ranitidine is rather selectively directed toward AChE was confirmed. H2-antagonists may interfere with acetylcholine catabolism. Inhibition of AChE by H~-antagonists might follow the accumula- tion of acetylcholine at cholinergic nerve termi-
nals, resulting in cholinergic excitation. As a
consequence, several organ functions con- trolled by acetylcholine could be influenced.
Histamine as well as acetylcholine receptors are
important in the control of gastric secretion.
Inhibition on gastric secretion by H2-antago- nists might be far more greater than stimula-
tion of acetylcholine. Thus, the gastrointestinal functions other than gastric secretion may be affected.
Furthermore, we observed the action of these drugs during contraction of the isolated guinea-pig ileum. Ranitidine per se induced contraction of the ileum, the pattern of which was similar to that of physostigmine but differ- ent from that of acetylcholine. Doses of cimeti-
dine, TZU-0460 and YM-11170 100 times
higher than that of ranitidine were needed to
elicite even slight contraction. The mode of action of ranitidine-induced
contraction was examined by using Hi-antago- nists and atropine. Diphenhydramine inhibited
the contraction induced by ranitidine. Raniti- dine might have had histamine-Hx activity, however, diphenhydramine inhibited the con-
traction induced by acetylcholine. The Hi- blocker, pyrilamine, had no effect. This sug- gests that diphenhydramine acts as an anticho- linergiclS,x4). Pyrilamine did not inhibit the contraction induced by ranitidine, thus raniti- dine has no histamine-Hx activity. Atropine
June 1986 Cholinergic Effects of H~-blockers 219
sulfa te i nh ib i t ed the c o n t r a c t i o n i n d u c e d by
ran i t id ine , i n d i c a t i n g tha t r an i t i d ine has cho-
l inerg ic act ion.
T h e gang l ion ic b locker , h e x a m e t h o n i u m ,
had no effect on con t r ac t i l e effect of r an i t i d ine .
p r io r t r e a t m e n t wi th m o r p h i n e , a b locker o f
endogenous ace ty lcho l ine 11), abo l i shed the
r a n i t i d i n e - i n d u c e d c o n t r a c t i o n , while exoge-
nous a c e t y l c h o l i n e - i n d u c e d con t r ac t i l e act ivi ty
was comple t e ly m a i n t a i n e d despi te t he pres-
ence o f m o r p h i n e . T h i s suggests that m o r p h i n e
blocks the ac t ion of e n d o g e n o u s ace ty lchol ine .
T h e effects o f r a n i t i d i n e m a y be r e l a t ed to the
e n d o g e n o u s release o f ace ty lchol ine , tha t is,
the re m a y be an i nd i r ec t r e l a t ionsh ip wi th the
inh ib i t ion of ace ty lcho l ines te rase .
S t a n d a r d d r u g levels o f these H2-blockers in
serumXS, 16) c a n n o t r e a c h levels sufficient to in-
h ib i t ace ty lchol ines te rase . In t he case o f musc le
p r e p a r a t i o n , c o n t r a c t i o n i n d u c e d by r a n i t i d i n e
b e g a n at the level of 0 . 8 6 / 2 M . It has b e e n re-
p o r t e d tha t s e r u m levels o f r an i t i d ine r e a c h e d
1 . 1 - 1 . 7 / 2 M w h e n the agen t was oral ly admin is -
t r a t e d at a dose o f 150 mgX6). Gas t ro in tes t ina l
mo t i l i t y in m a n m a y increase at t he usual
dosage level. T h e r e h a v e b e e n several repor t s
tha t r an i t i d ine affects the gas t r ic e m p t y i n g a n d
the lower e sophagea l s p h i n c t e r pressure in the
ratS), bu t not in manlT). It was not d e t e r m i n e d
if t he ex ten t o f the effects o f H~-hlockers ob-
served here are s imi la r to those in the h u m a n
body .
R e f e r e n c e s
1) Bertaccini G and Coruzzi G: Cholinergic-like effects of the new histamine H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine. Agent Action 12: 168, 1982
2) Corinaldesi R, et al: Effect of ranitidine and cimeti- dine on gastric emptying of a mixed meal in man. IntJ Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxico122: 498, 1984
3) Bertaccini G and Scarpignato C: Histamine H2- antagonists modify gastric emptying in the rat. Brit J Pharmaco177: 443, 1982
4) Hansen WE and Bertl S: The inhibition of acetylcho- linesterase and pseudocholinesterase by cimetidine. Arzneim-Forsch 33: 161, 1983
5) Hansen WE and Bertl S: Hemmung der Azetylcho- linesterasen-Ein relevanter Nebeneffekt yon Rani- tiding" Z Gastroenterologie 21: 164, 1983
6) Aono M, et al: Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by histamine-H~ receptor antagonists. Jpn J Gastro- enterol 81 : 1653, 1984 (]pn)
7) Hasegawa Y, et al: Phase I study of TZU-0460, a novel histamine Hz-receptor antagonist. (1) Single and one day dose study. Yakuri to Chiryo 12: 637, 1984 (Jpn)
8) Takagi T, et al: Effect of a new potent H2-blocker on gastric secretion induced by histamine and food in conscious dogs. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 256: 46, 1982
9) Pendleton RG, et al: Studies on MK-208 (YM-11170) a new, slowly dissoeiable H2-receptor antagonist. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 266: 4, 1983
10) Ellman GL, et al: A new and rapid colorimetric deter- mination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7: 88, 1961
11) Paton WDM: The action of morphine and related substances on contraction and on acetylcholine output of coaxially stimulated guinea-pig ileum. Brit J Phar- macol 12: 119, 1957
12) Galli A, et al: Effect of ranitidine on ileal myenteric plexus preparation and on acetyl- and butyrlcho- linesterase. Biochem Pharmacol 33: 1845, 1984
13) Rocha e Silva M and Antonio A: Bioassay of anti- histaminic action. In, Histamine II and anti- histaminics: Chemistry, Metabolism and Physiological and Pharmacological Action. (Rocha e Silva M, ed) Handbuch der Experimentellen Pharmakologie, Vol 18, Pt 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, p 381
14) Douglas WW: Histamine and 5-hydroxytriptamine (serotonin) and their antagonists. In, The Pharmaco- logical Basis of Therapeutics. 7th ed (Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW and Murad F eds) Macmillan, New York, 1985, p 605
15) Gaginella TS and Bauman JH: Ranitidine hydrochlo- ride drug intelligence. Clin Pharm 17: 873, 1983
16) Somogyi A and Gugler R: Clinical pharmacokinetics of cimetidine. Clin Pharmacokinetics 8: 463, 1983
17) Baldi F, et al: Oesophageal function after oral raniti- dine: An acute double blind study in normal subjects. Hepato-Gastroenterol 31 : 38, 1984