Upload
cyrill
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
1/60
SeismologyLecture 2
Normal modes and surface waves
Barbara Romanowicz
Univ. of California, Berkeley
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
2/60
From Stein and Wysession, 2003CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
3/60
P SSS
Surface waves
Loma Prieta (CA) 1989 M 7 earthquake observed at KEV, Finland
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
4/60
From Stein and Wysession, 2003
Shallow earthquake
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITPone hour
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
5/60
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
6/60
Surface waves Arise from interaction of body waves with free
surface. Energy confined near the surface
Rayleigh waves: interference between P and SV waves
exist because of free surface
Love waves: interference of multiple S reflections.Require increase of velocity with depth
Surface waves are dispersive: velocity depends onfrequency (group and phase velocity)
Most of the long period energy (>30 s) radiated fromearthquakes propagates as surface waves
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
7/60
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
8/60
After Park et al, 2005CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
9/60
Free oscillations
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
10/60
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
11/60
The kth free oscillation satisfies:
SNREI model; Solutions of the form
k = (l,m,n)
Lt
)(2
2
0 u
u
)( 20 kkk uuL
i
kru),,(u
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
Free Oscillations (Standing Waves)
0
2uL(u)
In the frequency domain:
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
12/60
Free Oscillations
In a Spherical, Non-Rotating, Elastic and Isotropic Earth model,
the kth free oscillation can be described as:
l = angular order; m = azimuthal order; n = radial order
k = (l,m,n) singlet
Degeneracy:
(l,n): multiplet = 2l+1 singlets with the same eigenfrequency nl
i
kru),,(
u
uk(r,,)r
nU
l(r)Y
l
m(,)nV
l(r)
1Yl
m(,) nW
l(r)r
1Yl
m(,)
knl
lmlYlm
(,)Xlm
()eim
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
13/60
Spheroidal modes : Vertical & Radial component
Toroidal modes : Transverse component
nTl
l: angular order, horizontal nodal planes
n: overtone number, vertical nodes
n=0
n=1
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
Fundamentalmode
overtones
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
14/60Spheroidal modes
n=0
nSl
S i l h
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
15/60
Spatial shapes:
D th iti it k l f th l d
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
16/60
Depth sensitivity kernels of earths normal modes
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
17/60
53.9
44.2
20.9
dr=0.05m
0T22S1
0S30S2
0T4
1S2
0S5
0
S0
0S43S1
2S2
1S3
0T3
Sumatra Andaman earthquake 12/26/04 M 9.3
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
18/60
Rotation, ellipticity, 3D heterogeneityremoves the degeneracy:
-> For each (n, l) there are 2l+1 singletswith different frequencies
0S2 0S3
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
19/60
0S2 0S3
2l+1=5 2l+1=7
mode S 7 singlets
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
20/60
mode 0S3 7 singlets
G hi l iti it k l K ( )
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
21/60
Geographical sensitivity kernel K0(,)
0S45
0S3
Mode frequency shifts
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
22/60
o
frequency
Frequency shift depends only on the average structure along the vertical planecontaining the source and the receiver weighted by the depth sensitivity ofthe mode considered:
Mode frequency shifts
SNREI->
dk
1
2d(s)ds
d(,) Mkk
(r)dm0
a
(r,,)r2dr
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
23/60
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
24/60
Anomalous splitting of core sensitive modes
Data
Model
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
25/60
Mantle mode
Core mode
S i b d ti
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
26/60
Seismograms by mode summation
Mode Completeness:
u Re akk
(t)uk(r,,)eiktekt
Orthonormality (L is an adjoint operator):
0uk'* u
kdVd
kk'
V
Lt
)(2
2
0 u
u
* Denotes complex conjugate
Depends on source excitation f
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
27/60
Normal mode summation 1D
A : excitationw : eigen-frequencyQ : Quality factor ( attenuation )
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
28/60
Spheroidal modes : Vertical & Radial component
Toroidal modes : Transverse component
nTl
l: angular order, horizontal nodalplanes
n: overtone number, vertical nodes
n=0
n=1
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
29/60
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
30/60
P SSS
Surface waves
Loma Prieta (CA) 1989 M 7 earthquake observed at KEV, Finland
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
31/60
u(t) Re Akk
eiktektStanding waves and travelling waves
Ak----linear combination of moment tensor elements and
spherical harmonics Ylm
When l is large (short wavelengths):
Yl
m(,) 1
sincos (l
1
2)
4m
2
eim
Replace x=a , where is angular distance and x linear distance along the earths
surface
Jeans formula : ka = l + 1/2
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
32/60
Yl
m(,)
1
sin cos kx
4m
2
eim
12 sin
ei(kx
4m
2)
ei(kx
4m
2)
Hence:
u(t) Re Akk
eiktekt
ei(ktkx)
ei(ktkx)Plane waves
propagating
in opposite
directions
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
33/60
-> Replace discrete sum over lby continuous
sum over frequency (Poissons formula):
u(x,t) S()ei(tkx)d
With k=k() (dispersion)k k()
Phase velocity:
C()
k
S is slowly varying with ; The main contribution to the integral is when
the phase is stationary:
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
34/60
S is slowly varying with ; The main contribution to the
integral is when the phase is stationary:
dd
t dk
dx 0 For some frequency s
The energy associated with a particular group
centered on stravels with the group velocity:
U()x
td
dk
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
35/60
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
36/60
Rayleigh phase velocity maps
Reference: G. MastersCIDER 2008
Period = 50 s Period = 100 s
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
37/60
Group velocity maps
Period = 100 sPeriod = 50 s
Reference: G. Masters CIDER 2008
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
38/60
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
39/60
Importance of overtones for constraining structurein the transition zone
n=0: fundamental mode
n=1n=2
overtones
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
40/60
Overtones By including overtones, we cansee into the transition zone andthe top of the lower mantle.
from Ritsema et al, 2004
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
41/60
Ritsema et al.,
2004
FundamentalMode
Surfacewaves
Overtonesurface waves
Body waves
120 km
325 km
600 km
1100 km
1600 km
2100
km
2800 km
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
42/60
Anisotropy
In general elastic properties of a material vary withorientation
Anisotropy causes seismic waves to propagate atdifferent speeds in different directions
If they have different polarizations
f
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
43/60
Types of anisotropy
General anisotropic model: 21independent elements of the elastictensor cijkl
Long period waveforms sensitive to asubset (13) of which only a small numbercan be resolved
Radial anisotropy Azimuthal anisotropy
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
44/60
Montagner andNataf, 1986
Radial
Anisotropy
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
45/60
Radial (polarization) Anisotropy
Love/Rayleigh wave discrepancy Vertical axis of symmetry A=Vph2,
C=Vpv2,
F,
L= Vsv2,
N= Vsh2(Love, 1911)
Long period S waveforms can only resolve L , N
=> x= (Vsh/Vsv) 2
dln x=2(dln VshdlnVsv)
A i th l i t
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
46/60
Azimuthal anisotropy
Horizontal axis of symmetry Described in terms of y, azimuth with
respect to the symmetry axis in the
horizontal plane 6 Terms in 2y(B,G,H) and 2 terms in 4y(E) Cos 2y-> Bc,Gc, Hc
Sin 2y-> Bs,Gs, Hs
Cos 4y-> Ec
Sin 4y-> Es
In general, long period waveforms can resolve Gcand Gs
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
47/60
Montagner and Anderson, 1989
Vectorial tomography:
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
48/60
Vectorial tomography: Combination radial/azimuthal (Montagner and
Nataf, 1986):
Radial anisotropy with arbitrary axisorientation (cf olivine crystals oriented inflow) orthotropic medium
L,N, Y, Q
x
y
z
Axis of symmetry
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
49/60
Montagner, 2002
x= (Vsh/Vsv)2
Radial
Anisotropy
Isotropic
velocity
Azimuthal
anisotropy
Depth= 100 km
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
50/60
Montagner, 2002
Ekstrom and Dziewonski, 1997
Pacific ocean radial anisotropy: Vsh > Vsv
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
51/60
Gung et al., 2003
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
52/60
Marone and Romanowicz, 2007
Absolute Plate Motion
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
53/60
Continuous lines: % Fo (Mg)fromGriffin et al. 2004Grey: Fo%93
black: Fo%92 Yuan and Romanowicz, in press
Layer 1 thickness
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
54/60
y
Mid-continental rift zone
Trans HudsonOrogen
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
55/60
Finite frequency effects
CIDER Summer 2010 - KITP
Structure sensitivity kernels: path average approximation (PAVA)versus Finite Frequenc (B rn) kernels
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
56/60
versus Finite Frequency ( Born) kernels
SR
M
SR
M
PAVA
2DPhase
kernels
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
57/60
Panning et al., 2009
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
58/60
Waveform tomography
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
59/60
Waveform Tomography
8/13/2019 CIDER Seismo2 Romanowicz b
60/60
observed
synthetic
Wa form omography