Upload
franchesca-munoz
View
41
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DR. PEPPER CASE STUDY ANALYSISMarketing 359
1
Christina, Chris, Franchesca
Problem & Solution2
◻Would it be a profitable opportunity for the Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. to produce, market, and distribute a new energy beverage brand in a maturing market?
◻Yes! ⬜Utilize existing customer loyalty
towards their most popular product, Dr. Pepper⬜Focus on the health aspects the
product provides⬜Targeted towards an older segment
of the population.
BRIEF HISTORY3
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.4
◻ Major integrated brand owner, bottler, and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages in the U.S., Mexico, and Canada
◻ In 2007, the company posted net sales of $5.7448 billion
◻ Strong Portfolio of Leading, Consumer-Preferred Brands⬜ High levels of consumer awareness, preference, and loyalty⬜ Dr. Pepper is the #2 flavored CSD in the U.S. (ACNielsen)
◻ Strong Customer Relationship
◻ Distribution
.
Key Challenge5
❏Energy beverage market is competitive
❏ 5 competitors dominate the US energy beverage market❏ 94% of dollar sales and unit volume market shares in
the US
CURRENT SITUATIONINDUSTRY ANALYSIS6
The Energy Beverage Market
7
◻4th largest non-alcoholic beverage category in the U.S. in 2006
■$6.2 billion dollar market
◻From 2001-2006, Retail sales grew at an average annual rate of 42.5%
◻Industry analysts projected an average annual growth rate of 10.2 percent from 2007-2011
■Market maturity
■Increasing price and packaging competition
■Entrance of hybrid energy beverages
Dr. Pepper Energy Beverage Financial Performance
8
⬜Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. does not have a current energy beverage brand in their portfolio
⬜In 2007:■More than 75 percent of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. volume was generated by brands that hold either the first or second position in their category
■Strength of these key brands has served as a platform for launching innovations and brand extensions
CURRENT SITUATIONCOMPANY ANALYSIS9
Key Success Factors10
CUSTOMERS WANT COMPETITION PROVIDES
KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
Energizer Added significant amounts of caffeine
Ingredients that boost energy
Health Sugar free options Product line extensions
Sleek design Slim and colorful can designs
Manufacturing equipment
SWOT11
Positive Negative
Internal Strengths• Integrated infrastructure• Stable cash flows
Weaknesses• Only one top performing product
within each product category-puts cash flow at risk
• No pre-existing product for energy drink category
External Opportunities• Strong CRM• Extensive manufacturing
and distribution network
Threats• Entering a maturing market• Top 5 competitors account for
94% of sales and consumption
Value Chain12
Firm Infrastructure - Highly integrated business model
Human Resource Management - Experienced exec management team
Technology Development - Broad geographic manufacturing & distribution
VALUE VALUE
Procurement - Strong consumer relationships & distribution expansion plans
Inbound Logistics: Raw materials
Operations: Manufacturing, packaging, quality control, maintenance
Outbound Logistics: Warehousing, distribution, delivery
Marketing & Sales: Advertising, promotion, pricing, channel relations
Service: Recycling, consumer monitoring
Ansoff Matrix
13
ALTERNATIVES (OPTIONS)14
Key Issues / Decision Criteria
15
◻ Key challenge: Is it profitable for Dr. Pepper Snapple Group to develop, market and sell an energy drink?
◻ Decision Criteria: ⬜What should the product be?⬜Who is the target market?⬜Positioning?⬜How should it be advertised?
Option #1: Accelerate16
A pre-workout energy drink targeting athletes and those who want to get the most out of their work out. Pros◻ Accelerade, sister product, has loyal consumer
base that most likely adopt the new productCons◻ Limited target market◻ May be hard to distinguish from current product
Option #2: No Energy Drink17
Energy drink market is entering the mature market stage and there’s a high degree of consumer loyalty to existing brands. Pros◻ Money can be allocated to other products. Cons◻ Energy beverage sales in 2006 were 6.2 billion
dollars.
Option #3: Dr. Pep 18 An energy drink that focuses on the health aspects the
product provides that’s targeted towards an older segment of the population.
Pros◻ Targets different segment of market◻ Taps into growing consumer trend (health)◻ Dr. Pepper name is well known, eases market
penetration
Cons◻ Potentially harmful to Dr. Pepper’s reputation as a
brand◻Could fail to attract desired segment of market
Key Issues and Related Solutions
19
Profitable
Product Developme
nt
Specific Target Market
Distinct Positioni
ngRecognizability
Option #1: Accelerate ✓ ✓ ✓
Option #2: No Energy Drink ✓ ✓
Option #3: Dr. Pep ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Recommendations20
◻Dr. Pep is the profitable option for entering the energy drink market.
◻Dr. Pep solves key issues such as:⬜What product is ⬜Target market⬜Positioning⬜Advertisement and promotion
21
The Dr. Pep Consumer
Ads22
Dr. Pep: So you stop burning both ends of the stick.
IMPLEMENTATION23
Timeline
24
Risks & Mitigation 25
◻Potentially harmful to Dr. Pepper’s reputation as a brand⬜Monitor consumer response to Dr. Pep that is linked to Dr. Pepper⬜ Have plans in place to neutralize negative commentary
◻Could fail to attract desired segment of market⬜Additional consumer research⬜Research on how best to reach target consumers
Measurements26
◻Sales⬜Cross-sales
◻Brand Awareness⬜Connection between Dr. Pepper and Dr. Pep
◻Brand Loyalty⬜Continued sales
Dr. Pep is the energy drink option that will capture an underserved segment of the energy drink market by focusing on the health benefits this energizer brings to the consumer.
Recap27
THANK YOU
28