54
Federal Program Director’s 2017-2018 Consolidated Application, New Form Training 3-2-2017

Federal Program Director’s 2017-2018 Consolidated ... with live... · 2017-2018 Consolidated Application, New Form Training ... • Patricia Martinez Migrant Education [email protected]

  • Upload
    lythien

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Federal Program Director’s 2017-2018 Consolidated Application, New Form Training

3-2-2017

Agenda

Continuous Improvement Process

• Commissioner’s priorities

• Needs assessment requirements

• CIP Requirements

– How work will affect new forms• PS3001: Needs Assessment, Priorities and Program Outcomes

• PS3099: Private School Services

• SSA implications

Materials

• http://www.esc20.net/default.aspx?name=ais_sup.nclb.FPDMeetings

• Campus Continuous Improvement Planning Teams Glossary

• TEA Strategic Priority Guide

• Commissioner’s Priorities

• ESSA: Section 1114 Schoolwide Program Plan

• Possible Data Sources Organized by Critical Success Factors

• Sample PS3001: Needs Assessment, Priorities and Program Outcomes

• Sample PS3099: Private School Services

• PS3001 Worksheet (ESC 20 Draft)

• (Table copy) 2017-2018 ESSA Consolidated Application for Funding Recommended USE of ESSA Funds

• (Table copy) CNA and Planning across systems

• (Table copy) Root Cause Analysis

Quick Survey

• District CNA/CIP Process

• Campus CNA/CIP Process

• At what stage in the process is your district?

PS30

01

–N

eed

s

Assessm

en

t,

Pri

ori

ties, an

d

Pro

gra

m O

utc

om

es

TEA’s Strategic Priorities

TEA Role: Enablers

Continuous Improvement Process

Texas AccountabilityIntervention System

Data Analysis

Needs Assessment

Improvement Plan

Implement & Monitor

State Accountability• Districts & Campuses• Improvement Required or

Met Standard• 4 Indexes & System

Safeguards• CaSE Ratings

Federal (ESEA Waiver)• Districts & Campuses• Priority or Focus• Annual Measureable

Objectives / Graduation Rate

Performance-Based Monitoring (PBM) • Districts• Staging• Performance-Based

Monitoring Analysis System

Continuous Improvement Process

NCLB to ESSA: New Roles for State/Local

NCLB ESSA

Top-down, one-size-fits-all with strong controls• ED academic achievement goals• Annual Yearly Progress• Mandated 5-state school

improvement interventions

Increase flexibility, authority and responsibility for state and local agencies

NCLB to ESSA: New Roles for State/Local

• TEA

– Performance management

– Guidance (accelerate student outcomes)

– Oversight

• LEA

– School performance management

– Guidance and technical assistance for improvement planning

– Coordinated use of funds

How will we increase local

agencies capacity to offer guidance and technical assistance to support schools?

NCLB to ESSA: New Roles for State/Local TEA Resources

• Recommended use of ESSA Funds

• Strategic Priority Guide

NCLB to ESSA: New Roles for State/Local

• TEA: Performance Management and Oversight

– Adopt challenging academic standards, assessments and accountability measures• No AMAOs, AYP or mandated five-stage school improvement

– Develop an ESSA State Consolidated Plan

– Collect and use data to monitor LEA continuous improvement

– State-determined Title I, Part A highly-qualified teacher** criteria; emphasis on equitable distribution of excellent educators

**NCLB paraprofessional highly-qualified criteria still in effect

NCLB to ESSA: New Roles for State/Local

• LEAs: Comprehensive Planning and Coordinated Spending

– Well-rounded educational opportunities, not limited to core academic content. Title IV, Part A – Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants.

– Methodology: Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant compliance**

**Title I-C, I-D, II, III and IV SNS requirements did not change

NCLB to ESSA: (New) Roles for Local

• Identified needs and planning out the impact they expect

• Stop just doing that has always been done

• Look at what identified needs are and output districts want

• If district determines what they have always been doing is the right thing, then continue doing it

• TEA is going to expect the campus plan to be a living, breathing document, everything to tie back to needs assessment

• Campus plan is going to have to be their campus’ actual planning document. Focused on identified needs.

• SMART goals, relevant and reasonable toward performance measure.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

ESSA: Title I, Part A

• Schoolwide – developed annually with meaningful stakeholder input, integrative approach to federally-funded programs, and based on school’s comprehensive needs assessment.

• Targeted Assistance – provide services to eligible children identified as having the greatest need … Each targeted assistance program shall determine which students will be served.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

ESSA

• Title II – Part A

– Use data for ongoing continuous improvement

– Update plan based on performance monitoring

• Title III – Part A

– Identify ELL students and provide effective programs

– Update plan based on performance monitoring

• Title IV – Part A

– Complete a needs assessment

Migrant Specific

19

LOCAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

MEP SERVICE DELIVERY

REQUIRED

Program

Activities

PLANNED

SUPPLEMENTAL

Activities

To Meet

STATEWIDENEEDS

To Meet

OTHERNEEDS

Migrant Specific LNA

20

• More migrant first graders must be promoted to second grade

• More 3-11 grade students must attend summer TAKS remediation if failed any content area

• More must be served in out-of-state summer migrant programs (all grades)

Migrant Specific LNA

21

Middle School

• More must use learning and study skills

• More must have timely attention and interventions

• More must have necessary homework assistance and tools at home

Secondary

• More must earn required credits for on-time graduation

• More must make up coursework missing due to late entry and/or early withdrawal

• More must be served in out-of-state summer migrant programs.

Campus Improvement Plan

A local education agency may receive a subgrantunder this part for any fiscal year only if such agency has on file with the state educational agency a plan, approved by the state educational agency.

NOT new: Consolidated application is the LEA plan that state has on file.

Campus Improvement Plan

Timely and meaningful consultation: Teachers, principals, other school leaders, paraprofessionals, specialized instructional support personnel, charter school leaders … administrators, other appropriate school personnel, and parents of children served.

NOT new: Applies to both ISDs and Charter Schools.

CNA and CIP

Table Talk

• Discuss how many programs, systems require needs assessments and improvement plans.

Continuous Improvement Process

ESSA: Campus Improvement Plan

• No longer calling required areas within the improvement plan “components”

• But …

PS3001: Needs Assessment, Priorities, and Program Outcomes

• Inventory School Plans, Teams and Planning Resources– Do we have a framework for districtwide planning?– How will we resolve issues that arise during our

work?– Do team members

• Know how to distinguish between inputs, outputs and outcomes

• Understand improvement planning and student outcome concepts

PS3001: Needs Assessment, Priorities, and Program Outcomes

Framework for planning teams

Characteristics of data analysis activities

Data analysis guiding questions

Who will collect what data?

Ongoing and informative What does the data reveal about trends and patterns over time?

What data sets? Snapshot of the LEA or school

What is the impact of these trends?

Required for decision-making

What other insights does the data reveal?

Process-driven What problemstatements have been identified?

Continuous Improvement Process PS3001

Needs Assessment, Priorities, and Program Outcomes

• TEA will not prescribe a CNA or CIP template

• Areas of investigation for CNA can align to previous 8 areas, CSFs, Commissioner Priorities

Analyze student data and draft problem statements that are

• Supported by facts and data

• Objective

• Concise language

• Specific details: who, what, when

• Relevant

• Avoids causations and jumping to solutions

Continuous Improvement Process PS3001

Collecting and analyzing student data

What are the problems?

Which problems are priority?

What are local needs?

Identifying root causes

Why do problems exist?

Continuous Improvement Process PS3001

Root Cause Analysis: Best Practices

Dialectical Analysis, Reflective Questions, Interrogating the Data

• 10-5-5 Process

• The 5 Whys

• Why … Because

Continuous Improvement Process PS3001

Practice Root Cause Analysis

Use PS3001 worksheet (ESC 20 draft)

Develop SMART Goals

Continuous Improvement Process PS3001

Root Cause Analysis

• PS3001 Worksheet

Setting SMART Goals

What are SMART Goals?

How can I write SMART Goals?

Setting S.M.A.R.T. Goals• Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-oriented goals

are tailored to support professional and personal success.

• Define what a SMART Goals means to you.

S systematic, significant, or streamline

M meaningful, motivating, methodical

A accountable, action plan, agreed-upon

R realistic, responsible, rooted in facts

T tenacity, target date, tangible

SMART goals are meant to be realistic

targets for employees to reach on a regular basis.

Writing S.M.A.R.T Goals• Break down each goal into a specific set of tasks and activities to

accomplish your goals.

• Goals are intentions:

Increase teacher training to improve their understanding of the five components of reading.

The percentage of teachers receiving training in the five components of reading will increase from 35 percent to 45 percent that will result in increased student reading levels by 2018.

Baseline 35% Goal 60%

• PS3001 Worksheet

Root Cause Analysis

SMART Goals

PS3001 worksheet

PS3001

Continuous Improvement Process PS3001

Priority 1

District/Campus CNA

• Do you have a need within your existing CNA that could align with Commissioner’s Priority 1?

• Does that need have baseline data to grow from?• Could you use the root cause analysis process to refine that

need?• Once refined, could you then develop a performance measure

and a goal around the root cause?• Do you have activities identified within your improvement

plan that currently address that root cause?• Are funds coordinated toward that activity or is it a single

funding source?• Are data sources identified?

Priority 2

Priority 3

Priority 4

IDENTIFIED NEED THAT ALIGNS WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITY

LEP/IMM

ALL FUND SOURCES

PS3001

Actual data to be collected at end of year to include money spent and student outcomes.

All programs

One-year, SMART goal 3-5 year goal

PS3001: Considerations• Baseline data this first year• What are districts doing in their initiatives• Write performance measures using SMART goals for student

outcomes• SMART goal is reasonable and ATTAINABLE• Summer of 2018, column will be added to identify progress

toward SMART goal.• If district is not making progress they will have an additional

schedule toward improvement in the following year• Two-three years with no progress, district will go into corrective

action and have specific conditions place on grant award.

PS3099

Affirmations may be due at the time application is submitted, June 30 for many districts.

PS3099

Only for 17-18 as of June 1

Shared Service Arrangements and ESSA

• ESSA Consolidated Application will still be completed by fiscal agent

• PS3001 not applicable to fiscal agent

• As of this year, goals set by each program per ESC 20 initiative

Contacts

• Alex Dominguez Title I, A; Private [email protected] 210-370-5410

• Carolina Gonzales Title II, Title [email protected] 210-370-5483

• Patricia Martinez Migrant [email protected] 210-370-

• Jacob Ortega Migrant Education

[email protected] 210-370-