參考文獻 - nccur.lib.nccu.edu.twnccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/32784/11/65102011.pdf · ＃李震山，〈論個人資料保護－以人體基因資訊為例〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》

參考文獻

231

參考文獻

※ 中文部分

＊書籍

◎ 中文原著

＃王澤鑑，《侵權行為法第一冊：基本理論，一般侵權行為》，作者自刊 (1999年修正版)。

＃朱瑞祥，《美國聯邦最高法院判例史程》，黎明 (1987 年再版)。＃李建良，《憲法理論與實踐 (一) 》，學林 (1999)。＃李震山，《人性尊嚴與人權保障》，元照 (2000)。＃吳庚，《憲法的解釋與適用》，作者自刊 (2003)。＃法治斌，《人權保障與釋憲法制－憲法專論(一)》，政大法學叢書 (23) ，月旦

(1993 年再版)。＃法治斌，《人權保障與司法審查－憲法專論(二)》，政大法學叢書 (31) ，月旦

(1994)。＃法治斌，《法治國家與表意自由－憲法專論(三)》，政大法學叢書 (50) ，正典

(2003)。＃法治斌、董保城，《憲法新論》，作者自刊 (2003)。＃林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元與張文貞，《憲法－權力分立》，學林 (2003)。＃林山田，《刑法各罪論 (上冊) 》，作者自刊 (1999 年 2版)。＃林菊枝，《親屬法新論》，五南 (1996)。＃紀欣，《生死一線間：安樂死與死刑制度之探討》，商周 (2003)。＃施啟揚，《民法總則》，作者自刊 (1996 年 7版)。＃許宗力，《憲法與法治國行政》，元照 (1999)。＃陳新民，《中華民國憲法釋論》，三民 (1997 年 2版)。＃張宏誠，《同性戀者權利平等保障之憲法基礎》，學林 (2002)。＃張春興，《心理學》，東華 (2000 年 2版)。＃張潤書，《行政學》，三民 (1995 年 4版)。＃陸潤康，《美國聯邦憲法論》，凱侖 (1983 年 3版)。

論生殖性複製與生殖自由

232

＃黃程貫，《勞動法》，空大 (1997 年再版)。＃費昌勇，《動物倫理與公共政策》，臺灣商務 (2002)。＃曾淑瑜，《生命科學與法規範之調和》，翰蘆 (2003)。＃蘇永欽，《走向憲政主義》，聯經 (1994)。＃蘇永欽，《合憲性控制的理論與實際》，政大法學叢書 (32) ，月旦 (1994)。＃蘇永欽，〈試釋違憲〉，收於氏著《違憲審查》，學林 (1999)。＃司法院編，《司法院大法官釋憲五十週年紀念論文集》，司法院 (1998)。＃司法院大法官書記處編，《德國聯邦憲法法院裁判選輯(八)》，司法院 (1999)。＃李建凡編著，《無性複製技術》，五南 (2002)。＃李建良、簡資修編，《憲法解釋之理論與實務第二輯》，中研院中山所 (2000)。＃何思因編，《美國》，政大國關中心 (1994 年再版)。＃法治斌教授紀念論文集編輯委員會編，《法治與現代行政法學》，法治斌教授紀念論文集，元照 (2004)。

＃林子儀、蔡明誠編，《基因技術挑戰與法律回應：基因科技與法律研討會論文集》，台大科法中心叢書 (1) ，學林 (2003)。

＃焦興鎧編，《美國聯邦最高法院論文集》，中研院歐美所 (1993)。＃劉孔中、陳新民編，《憲法解釋之理論與實務第三輯‧上冊》，中研院中山所

(2002)。

◎ 翻譯著作

＃ LORI ANDREW & DOROTHY NELKIN著，廖月娟譯，《出賣愛因斯坦：人體組織販賣市場》，時報 (2001)。

＃ JUDITH BAER著，官曉薇、高培恒譯，《法律之前的女性─建構女性主義法理學》，商周 (2000)。

＃ DAVID BAINBRIDGE著，林丹卉、楊育明譯，《體內小訪客：性、懷孕、分娩的生命奧秘》，商周 (2002)。

＃ ROBIN BAKER著，李沛沂、章蓓蕾譯，《精子戰爭》，麥田 (1999)。＃ KEVIN DAVIES著，潘震澤譯，《基因組圖譜解密》，時報 (2001)。＃ RICHARD DAWKINS著，趙淑妙譯，《自私的基因：我們都是基因的俘虜？》，頁 136-64，天下 (1995)。

＃ LAWRENCE M. FRIEDMAN著，楊佳陵譯，《美國法導讀：美國法律與司法制度概述》，商周 (2004)。

＃ FRANCIS FUKUYAMA著，杜默譯，《後人類未來：基因工程的人性浩劫》，時報 (2002)。

＃ TIJS GOLDCHMIDT著，黃秀如譯，《達爾文的夢幻池塘》，時報 (2003)。＃ ALAN GRANT著，劉世忠譯，《美國政府與政治》，五南 (1996)。

參考文獻

233

＃ STEVE JONES著，潘震澤譯，《Y染色體－男子漢的本質》，時報 (2004)。＃ OLIVIA JUDSON著，潘勛譯，《Dr. Tatiana給全球生物的性忠告：性的演化生物學》，麥田 (2003 年再版)。

＃ GINA KOLATA著，洪蘭譯，《基因複製：從複製羊桃麗看人類的未來》，遠流(1998)。

＃ RICHARD A. POSNER著，高忠義譯，《性與理性》，桂冠 (2002)。＃ MATT RIDLEY著，范昱峰譯，《紅色皇后：性與人性的演化》，時報 (2000)。＃ GEORGE H. SABINE著，李少軍、尚新建譯，《西方政治思想史》，桂冠 (1991)。＃ LEE M. SILVER著，李千毅、莊安祺譯，《複製之謎：性、遺傳和基因再造》，時報 (1997)。

＃ JOHN SULSTON & GEORGINA FERRY著，潘震澤、杜默譯，《生命的線索》，時報 (2003)。

＃ CASS R. SUNSTEIN著，商千儀、高忠義譯，《司法極簡主義：一次一案的精神與民主政治》，商周 (2001)。

＃ NICHOLAS WADE編著，趙沛林譯，《複製人完全手冊》，胡桃木 (2004)。＃ IAN WILMUT, KEITH CAMPBELL & COLIN TUDGE著，陳紹寬、朱佩雯譯，《我創造了桃莉！－從複製羊談生命再造與基因工程》，究竟 (2000)。

＃ LEWIS WOLPERT著，周業仁譯，《胚胎大勝利》，天下 (1998)。＃ MARLENE ZUK著，劉泗翰譯，《物競性擇》，書林 (2004)。

＊期刊文獻

◎ 中文原著

＃方流芳，〈羅伊判例：關於司法和政治分界的爭辯─墮胎和美國憲法第十四修正案的司法解釋〉，載於《比較法研究》第 12卷第 1期 (1998/3)。

＃王道還，〈從「科學怪人」到「美麗新世界」：「複製羊」桃莉引起的爭議〉，載於《當代》第 119期 (1997/7)。

＃王富仙，〈受精卵法律地位之探索〉，載於《法學叢刊》第 183期 (2001/7)。＃王澤鑑，〈特殊侵權行為 (一) －特殊侵權行為的類型構成及規範體系－〉，載於《台灣本土法學雜誌》第 58期 (2004/5)。

＃朱世霓，〈澳洲胚胎幹細胞研究最新立法趨勢簡析〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 14卷第 11期 (2002/11)。

＃朱世霓，〈英國有關複製人立法及胚胎幹細胞研究爭議發展始末及評析〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 14卷第 3期 (2002/3)。

＃李素華，〈歐盟人類胚胎複製研究之法律規範爭議〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 12卷第 12期 (2000/12)。


234

＃李素華，〈德國將有限度開放人類胚胎幹細胞進口〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 14卷第 3期 (2002/3)。

＃李素華，〈德國胚胎幹細胞法 (草案) 介紹與淺析〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 14卷第 7期 (2002/7)。

＃李悌愷，〈論屍體 (骨) 之法律性質〉，載於《台灣本土法學雜誌》第 56期(2004/3)。

＃李國光，〈挑戰生殖倫理的新科技〉，載於《科學人》第 17期 (2003/7)。＃李惠宗，〈論宗教信仰自由及國家保護義務─評司法院大法官釋字第四九O

號解釋─〉，載於《台灣本土法學雜誌》第 5期 (1999/12)。＃李震山，〈從憲法保障生命權及人性尊嚴之觀點論人工生殖〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 2期 (1995/6)。

＃李震山，〈論個人資料保護－以人體基因資訊為例〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 75期 (2001/8)。

＃李震山，〈「複製人」科技發展對既有法律思維與制度之衝擊－以基本權利保障為例〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 79期 (2001/12)。

＃李震山，〈胚胎基因工程之法律涵意－以生命權保障為例〉，載於《台大法學

論叢》第 31卷第 3期 (2002/5)。＃李鎡堯，〈國內人工生殖科技之現況〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 2期 (1995/6)。＃吳庚，〈違憲審查制度之起源功能及發展〉，載於《法官協會雜誌》第 3卷第

2期 (2001/12)。＃何建志，〈法務部「複製人相關問題之研討」會議評論〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 1期 (1999/1)。

＃何建志，〈冰島的浮士德契約？全國基因資料庫的建立與省思〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 1期 (1999/1)。

＃何建志，〈世界各國基因科技相關法令摘要〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 1期 (1999/1)。

＃何建志，〈反反胚胎商品化的一些法律論證〉，載於《律師雜誌》第 285期(2003/6)。

＃林子儀，〈普通法院各級法官及行政法院評事應否具有違憲審查權〉，載於《憲政時代》第 18卷第 3期 (1993/1)。

＃林子儀，〈憲政體制與機關爭議之釋憲方法之應用－美國聯邦最高法院審理權力分立案件之解釋方法〉，載於《憲政時代》第 27卷第 4期 (2002/4)。

＃林明定、翁濬一，〈胚胎幹細胞公然挑戰人類生命倫理！？〉，載於《生技時代》第 12期 (2002/10)。

＃林美雯，〈複製人網站大集合〉，載於《牛頓雜誌》第 215期 (2001/7)。＃林雅惠，〈資訊隱私權之重塑－以行動商務為例〉，載於《科技法學評論》第1卷第 1期 (2004/4)。

＃周成功，〈複製羊的科學觀〉，載於《當代》第 119期 (1997/7)。

參考文獻

235

＃周志宏，〈複製人與生物科技之法律規範〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 35期(1998/4)。

＃苑舉正，〈複製科技的潘朵拉盒子：桃莉震撼下的倫理反省〉，載於《當代》

第 119期 (1997/7)。＃侯英泠，〈「計畫外生育」與非財產上損害賠償－評最高法院九 O 年度台上字第四六八號民事判決－〉，載於《台灣本土法學雜誌》第 47期 (2003/6)。

＃張志明，〈由美國聯邦最高法院與德國聯邦憲法法院墮胎判決論國家義務之不同觀點－憲法權利之消極性與積極性〉，載於《憲政時代》第 28卷第 1期 (2002/7)。

＃陳文吟，〈由胚胎幹細胞研究探討美國專利法上「道德」實用性因應生物科技的必要性〉，載於《台北大學法學論叢》第 49期 (2001/12)。

＃陳英淙，〈由德國聯邦憲法法院之判決 (BverfGE 88, 203) 探討墮胎合法化問題〉，載於《憲政時代》第 28卷第 1期 (2002/7)。

＃陳英鈐，〈人類幹細胞研究的法議題〉，載於《政大法學評論》第 67期 (2001/9)。

＃陳英鈐，〈胚胎植入前基因檢測的憲法問題〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 14期 (2002/4)。

＃陳英鈐，〈人類胚胎幹細胞研究的法問題－胚胎的基本權利地位〉，載於《律師雜誌》第 285期 (2003/6)。

＃陳美華，〈物化或解放－女性主義者關於代理孕母的爭論〉，載於《月旦法學

雜誌》第 52期 (1999/9)。＃陳堂麒，〈「桃莉之死」敲響複製技術警鐘？！〉，載於《生技時代》第 17期

(2003/3)。＃陳啟行，〈資訊隱私權法理探討─以美國法為中心〉，載於《政大法學評論》第 64期 (2000/12)。

＃陳愛娥，〈憲法對未出生胎兒的保護─作為基本權保護義務的一例來觀察〉，

載於《政大法學評論》第 58期 (1997/12)。＃張宇樞，〈複製人之衝擊及相關法律問題初探〉，載於《法令月刊》第 53卷第

5期 (2002/5)。＃曾志朗，〈Goodbye, Dolly！－我們應該哀悼你的英年早逝，還是追思你的壽終正寢？〉，載於《科學人》第 13期 (2003/3)。

＃曾志朗，〈社會生活基因 A、T、G、C〉，載於《科學人》第 23期 (2004/1)。＃湯德宗，〈立法裁量之司法審查的憲法依據－違憲審查正當性理論初探－〉，載於《憲政時代》第 26卷第 2期 (2000/10)。

＃黃昭元，〈立法裁量與司法審查－以審查標準為中心〉，載於《憲政時代》第26卷第 2期 (2000/10)。

＃黃昭元，〈憲法權利限制的司法審查標準：美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分

析〉，載於《台大法學論叢》第 33卷第 3期 (2004/5)。


236

＃程明修，〈胎兒與生命權保障主體性間之憲法論證難題〉，載於《東吳大學法

律學報》第 13卷第 2期 (2002/2)。＃程樹德，〈不可能的成功：從演化生物學看複製科技〉，載於《當代》第 119期 (1997/7)。

＃雷文玫，〈兩對父母親的拔河－從父母子女關係之認定看近來代理孕母合法化

爭議〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 52期 (1999/9)。＃楊君萍，〈從科學的角度看「複製羊」及「轉殖羊」〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》

第 35期 (1998/4)。＃楊秀儀，〈病人，家屬，社會：論基因年代病患自主權可能之發展〉，載於《台大法學論叢》第 31卷第 5期 (2002/9)。

＃楊雅雯，〈複製人類的倫理爭辯與法律管制模式研究〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 7期 (2000/7)。

＃廖元豪，〈論我國憲法上之「行政保留」－以行政、立法兩權關係為中心〉，載於《東吳法律學報》第 12卷第 1期 (2000/2)。

＃齊隆壬，〈電影‧複製‧科技人：從「大都會」到「銀翼殺手」和「魔鬼終結者 II」〉，載於《當代》第 119期 (1997/7)。

＃潘震澤譯，〈發現 DNA雙螺旋結構 50週年慶－專訪華生〉，載於《科學人》第 14期 (2003/4)。

＃劉承慶、劉承愚，〈人體組織應用於生物科技之管制法令與財產權〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 93期 (2003/2)。

＃蔡甫昌，〈為什麼不能訂製一個小孩！？〉，載於《生技時代》第 17期 (2003/3)。

＃蔡宗珍，〈「基因科技安全管制法」草案總說明〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 11期 (2001/7)。

＃蔡淑華，〈日本公布人類複製技術規範法〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 13卷第3期 (2001/3)。

＃蔡維音，〈德國基本法第一條「人性尊嚴」規定之探討〉，載於《憲政時代》第 18卷第 1期 (1992/7)。

＃蔡維音，〈「擬似權利主體」之法律意涵－重新建構人類基因之法律地位〉，載

於《成大法學》第 2期 (2001/12)。＃鄧曉芳，〈日本公布「ES細胞 (胚胎幹細胞) 培植暨使用指針」〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 13卷第 12期 (2001/12)。

＃鄧曉芳，〈日本政府公布「特定胚胎處理指針」〉，載於《科技法律透析》第14卷第 2期 (2002/2)。

＃鄧曉芳，〈簡介日本生技法制倫理規範趨勢-兼評析我國相關生技法規概況 (上) 〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 14卷第 8期 (2002/8)。

＃鄧曉芳，〈簡介日本生技法制倫理規範趨勢-兼評析我國相關生技法規概況 (下) 〉，載於《科技法律透析》第 14卷第 9期 (2002/9)。

參考文獻

237

＃鍾芳樺，〈美國生物倫理諮詢委員會複製人報告之摘要〉，載於《生物科技與

法律研究通訊》第 1期 (1999/1)。＃薛瑞元，〈「代理孕母」的管制原則與措施〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 52期

(1999/9)。＃魏汎娟，〈複製技術與基因改造動物之發展現況〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 12期 (2001/10)。

＃顏厥安，〈鼠肝與蟲臂的管制：談生命科技與法律〉，載於《當代》第 119期 (1997/7)。

＃顏厥安，〈財產、人格，還是資訊？論人體基因的法律地位〉，載於《臺大法學論叢》第 31卷第 1期 (2002/1)。

＃龐中培，〈你需要保存臍帶血嗎？〉，載於《科學人》第 29期 (2004/7)。＃羅麗珠、王惠珍，〈複製人類在歐美之法制規範〉，載於《資訊法務透析》第

10卷第 9期 (1998/9)。＃蘇永欽，〈職權命令的合憲性問題－地方自治是否創造了特別的合憲存在基礎－〉，載於《台灣本土法學雜誌》第 11期 (2000/6)。

＃蘇永欽，〈法律作為一種學問〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 98期 (2003/7)。＃蘇永欽，〈二 OO四年總統大選後我國憲政改革的展望〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》第 111期 (2004/8)。

＃蘇麗華，〈《魔鬼二世》袋鼠男人不稀奇！〉，載於《生技時代》第 10期 (2002/8)。＃蘇麗華，〈《複製殺人魔》終結罪惡元兇〉，載於《生技時代》第 12期 (2002/10)。

◎ 翻譯著作

＃ George J. Annas, Leonard H. Glantz, Patricia A. Roche著，何建志譯，〈基因隱私法範本〉，載於《生物科技與法律研究通訊》第 7期 (2002/7)。

＃ Charles Choi著，張雨青譯，〈複製人大不易〉，載於《科學人》第 17期 (2003/7)。＃ Jose B. Cibelli等著，黃榮棋譯，〈第一個複製人胚胎〉，載於《科學人》第 1期 (2002/3)。

＃ Steve Ditlea著，黃榮棋譯，〈人工心臟前景可期？〉，載於《科學人》第 7期(2002/9)。

＃ Carol Ezzell著，張孟媛譯，〈成體幹細胞功效受質疑〉，載於《科學人》第 5期 (2002/7)。

＃ W. Wayt Gibbs著，潘震澤譯，〈看不見的基因組〉，載於《科學人》第 23期(2004/1)。

＃ W. Wayt Gibbs著，李千毅譯，〈組裝生命〉，載於《科學人》第 28期 (2004/6)。＃ Robin Marantz Hennig著，潘震澤譯，〈潘朵拉的嬰兒〉，載於《科學人》第

17期 (2003/7)。＃ Robert Lanza & Nadia Rosenthal著，涂可欣譯，〈幹細胞的挑戰〉，載於《科學


238

人》第 29期 (2004/7)。＃ Sally Lehrman著，黃榮祺譯，〈複製的字眼之爭〉，載於《科學人》第 18期

(2003/8)。＃ Sergio Pistoi著，黃榮棋譯，，〈他是複製人狂徒？〉，載於《科學人》第 3期

(2002/5)。＃ Christian Starck著，李建良譯，〈基本權利之保護義務〉，載於《政大法學評

論》第 58期 (1997/12)。＃ Christian Starck著，陳英鈐譯，〈生物學與生殖醫學的憲法界限〉，載於《台大法學論叢》第 33卷第 3期 (2004/5)。

＃ Benjamin Stix著，張孟媛譯，〈幹細胞替代品？〉，載於《科學人》第 6期 (2002/8)。

＃ Gary Stix著，潘震澤譯，〈到底複製了什麼？〉，載於《科學人》第 1期 (2002/3)。

＊學位論文

＃王素珍，《人體組織之保障與管制－財產權與人格權結合的另類思考》，輔大法研所碩士論文 (2003)。

＃王偉鴻，《治療性複製法律與倫理論證思維之研究－兼論禁止生殖性複製之法規範正當性》，台師大三研所碩士論文 (2003)。

＃李文琦，《基因可專利性之研究：以美國專利制度為中心》，東吳法研所碩士論文 (2001)。

＃李梵嶢，《人類胚胎幹細胞 (Human Embryonic Stem Cells, hESCs) 研究及醫療應用之法律建制》，台北大學法研所碩士論文 (2002)。

＃林俊言，《論非列舉權利之憲法保障－以憲法第二十二條的功能與操作為核心》，政大法研所碩士論文 (2002)。

＃林紋玲，《商品化的身體：從買賣市場的實際存在探討有關人體器官取得之管制政策》，台大法研所碩士論文 (2002)。

＃林建中，《隱私權概念之再思考─關於概念範圍、定義權利形成方法》，台大法研所碩士論文 (1999)。

＃翁大鈞，《「複製人」之立法研究》，台大三研所碩士論文 (2000)。＃高培恒，《生物醫學人體試驗之國際法規範》，東吳法研所專業碩士班碩士論文 (2001)。

＃康立平，《論行政保留》，輔大法研所碩士論文 (1995)。＃許純琪，《醫病關係中的告知後同意》，台大法研所碩士論文 (2002)。＃許修豪，《非人類動物的基本權利－從黑猩猩談起》，台大法研所碩士論文

(1998)。

參考文獻

239

＃郭乃菱，《從國際公約論我國野生動物保育法之法制與實踐》，東海法研所碩士論文 (2002)。

＃郭國斌，《從美國墮胎議題的爭議論「生命權」與「自由權」的價值衝突》，文化美研所碩士論文 (2001)。

＃張志明，《美國聯邦最高法院與德國聯邦憲法法院墮胎判決之比較研究》，政

大法研所碩士論文 (1999)。＃陳仲嶙，《從新生兒篩檢探討隱私權的法之規制》，台大法研所碩士論文

(2002)。＃陳志興，《基因發明專利之保護－以人體基因組序列相關發明可專利性為核心》，台北大學法研所碩士論文 (2002)。

＃陳彥宏，《論動物利益的平等考量與衡量》，台大法研所碩士論文 (2002)。＃陳建成，《論民刑法出生學說之實用性》，東吳法研所專業碩士班碩士論文

(2001)。＃陳慧雯，《人工協助生殖技術管制模式之法律政策分析－以代理孕母之管制為

中心－》，台大法研所碩士論文，(1999)。＃詹依純，《建構「人為飼養或管領動物」之法律權利》，輔大法研所碩士論文

(1999)。＃廖慧全，《論代理孕母之法律規範》，國管院法研所碩士論文 (2000)。＃劉后安，《論美國與台灣墮胎法律制度合憲性問題之研究》，台大法研所碩士

論文 (1999)。＃衛品妃，《由生物技術論人類幹細胞之可專利性》，東吳法研所專業碩士班碩士論文 (2003)。

＃蔡達智，《生命科技的發展對基本人權的影響》，中興法研所碩士論文 (1997)。＃何建志，《基因歧視與法律對策之研究》，台大法研所博士論文 (2002)。＃陳美伶，《人工生殖之立法規範》，政大法研所博士論文 (1994)。

＊報紙資料 (依日期)

＃〈冰島將建全民基因庫〉，民生報，醫藥新聞 (1999/12/7)。＃〈第四號染色體解碼肝癌之謎初揭〉，聯合報，醫藥新聞 (1999/12/30)。＃〈人類基因組圖譜完成啟歷史新頁〉，中國時報，焦點企劃：人類基因圖譜

解密 (2000/6/27)。＃〈管控基因實驗游走道德防線〉中國時報，社會綜合 (2001/3/19)。＃〈三學者力排眾議今年著手複製人〉、〈人工生殖法將明文禁止〉，聯合報，

重點新聞 (2001/8/9)。＃〈國內首頭複製牛誕生〉，中國時報，焦點新聞；〈接生複製牛李善男等了


240

30年〉，聯合晚報，本日焦點 (2001/9/3)。＃〈活不到六天複製牛「畜寶」死了〉，中國時報，社會新聞；〈前夜心肺衰竭

死亡複製牛畜寶死了〉，聯合報，綜合要聞 (2001/9/8)。＃〈複製人作半套醫界有共識〉，中國時報，焦點新聞；〈人類胚胎複製成功再

爆複製人爭議〉，聯合報，國際新聞 (2001/11/27)。＃〈德國修憲保障動物權〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2002/5/19)。＃〈供核源為成羊耳細胞台灣複製羊姊妹花世界首例〉，自由時報，綜合新聞

(2002/10/9)。＃〈全球首位複製人「夏娃」誕生將做 DNA鑑定〉、〈下一步複製成人、思想

和記憶〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2002/12/28)。＃〈代理孕母合法化曙光再現〉，中國時報，焦點新聞 (2003/2/11)。＃〈活了六歲桃莉羊安樂死〉，中國時報，社會新聞 (2003/2/16)。＃〈50 年前破解 DNA雙螺旋結構〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2003/3/1)。＃〈複製羊寶吉、寶祥慶週歲〉，中國時報，社會新聞 (2003/7/24)。＃〈改採耳朵組織新複製牛「如意」存活五月後亮相〉、〈如意健康良好沈志

朋笑逐顏開〉、〈人工生殖法草案排除代理孕母〉，中國時報，社會新聞 (2003/8/13)。

＃〈「母子保健法」修正結紮不需配偶同意〉，中時晚報，政治新聞；〈墮胎免配偶同意撤案〉，聯合晚報，綜合 (2003/8/27)。

＃〈晚婚卵子可先冰存〉，中國時報，社會新聞 (2003/10/2)。＃〈製造複製人專家「偷跑」植胚胎〉，聯合報，國際萬象 (2004/1/18)。＃〈南韓造出卅枚成人胞細複製胚胎〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2004/2/14)。＃〈生殖科技基因診斷避免試管嬰兒缺陷〉，中國時報，醫藥新聞 (2004/4/2)。＃〈《殘蝕的理性》墮胎片遭痛批暫時停用〉中國時報，社會新聞 (2004/4/17)。＃〈捍衛婦女墮胎權華府百萬人示威〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2004/4/27)。＃〈歐盟東擴增納十國影響非常深遠〉，工商時報，論壇；〈歐盟憲法中央集權

化〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2004/4/29)。＃〈首開國際先例衛署擬修法限制孕婦吸菸〉、〈專家：有侵害人權之虞〉，中

國時報，焦點新聞 (2004/5/3)。＃〈孕婦吸菸不上課就罰錢〉，中國時報，社會新聞 (2004/5/4)。＃〈幹細胞會長牙未來免裝假牙〉，自由時報，國際新聞 (2004/5/5)。＃〈高齡婆婆媽媽將難圓生育夢〉，中國時報，焦點新聞 (2004/5/9)。＃〈2代複製牛「小三郎」活跳跳〉、〈技術突破複製動物不再早夭〉、〈哞！

台灣複製牛隻隻「如意」〉，中時晚報，醫藥新聞；〈1頭牛複製 4頭台灣成功了〉，聯合晚報，國內要聞 (2004/5/24)。

＃〈民國一一一年台灣人口零成長〉，中國時報，社會新聞；〈法律空窗期「黑牌」人工生殖中心多〉，民生報，醫藥新聞 (2004/5/25)。

＃〈國際視窗人工受孕＋顯微注射愛滋父母可以生下健康寶寶〉，中國時報，

參考文獻

241

醫藥新聞 (2004/6/10)。＃〈經合組織排名我生育率倒數第一〉、〈獎勵生育提供幼兒照顧最實際〉，中

國時報，焦點新聞 (2004/6/13)。＃〈多管齊下再禿也能還你青絲〉，中國時報，國際新聞 (2004/6/17)。＃〈假性一胎化？男女嬰空前失衡〉、〈【2假性一胎化】小皇帝娶某要靠進口

的〉、〈訂做男娃多醫生無奈〉，中時晚報，焦點新聞 (2004/6/26)。＃〈生殖科技不孕求子科技現「生」機〉，中國時報，醫藥新聞 (2004/7/5)。＃〈墮胎擬取消 24周上限衛署將邀專家再討論〉，聯合報，醫藥新聞

(2004/7/9)。＃〈臍帶血移植成功貧血病童重生〉、〈院方爭取專案開放造福更多罕病患

者〉，中國時報，焦點新聞 (2004/7/10)。＃〈人為何會變老？各家理論說分明〉，中國時報，醫藥新聞 (2004/7/12)。＃〈柏楊：憲改不可暴虎馮河〉，中國時報，政治新聞 (2004/7/15)。＃〈政院瘦身縮為 13部 4會 5機關〉，中國時報，政治新聞 (2004/7/17)。＃〈代理孕母爭議尋求公民會議解套〉，中國時報，社會新聞 (2004/7/22)。＃〈愈年輕愈容易受孕〉，中國時報，醫藥新聞 (2004/7/22)。＃〈匪夷所思？千萬年後男性不存在〉，聯合報，醫藥新聞 (2004/7/30)。＃〈DNA雙螺旋發現人克里克 88歲癌逝〉，聯合晚報，醫藥新聞 (2004/7/30)。＃〈三總調查不孕症好焦慮好憂鬱〉，聯合報，醫藥新聞 (2004/7/30)。＃潘震澤，〈粒線體改造基因言過其實〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2001/5/7)。＃顏厥安，〈「基因改造」科技應立法規範〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2001/5/7)。＃宋克義，〈如果孔夫子捐精〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2003/2/16)。＃許文德，〈墮胎、蘋果酒館，血淚斑斑的墮胎拉鋸戰〉，中國時報，論壇新聞

(2003/8/1)。＃蘇芊玲，〈性教育何去何從？---一場墮胎影片記者會的後續思考〉，自由時報，

自由廣場 (2004/4/18)。＃官曉薇，〈限制孕婦吸菸，妨害自主〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2004/5/4)。＃陳耀昌，〈志業城市 (Career and The City) 〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2004/6/29)。＃李美賢，〈在志業與繁殖之間〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2004/7/10)。＃邱淑媞，〈消失中的臺灣女兒〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2004/7/13)。＃隋杜卿，〈何種憲政體制才合身合用？〉，聯合報，民意論壇 (2004/7/20)。＃何春蕤，〈權利不能訴諸多數決〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2004/7/23)。＃林國民，〈為什麼要開公民會議〉，中國時報，論壇新聞 (2004/7/25)。

＊網路資源 (依引述順序)


242

＃中國大陸在人體器官複製技術上之情形，http://news.sina.com.tw/sinaNews/ttimes/strait/2001/0109/2565111.html (2004/4/27造訪)。

＃中國大陸衛生部反對複製人之態度，http://auto.fcu.edu.tw/~bulletin/high/bio/news/11/2001-1130-1552.htm (2004/4/27造訪)。

＃中國大陸衛生部之「人類輔助生殖技術管理辦法」規定，http://www.moh.gov.cn/was40/detail?record=8&channelid=8085&searchword=%C8%CB%C0%E0%B8%A8%D6%FA%C9%FA%D6%B3%BC%BC%CA%F5%B9%E6%B7%B6 (2004/5/1造訪)。

＃中國大陸衛生部之「人類輔助生殖技術規範」規定，http://www.moh.gov.cn/was40/detail?record=1&channelid=7565&searchword=%BF%CB%C2%A1 (2004/5/1造訪)。

＃中國大陸科技部與衛生部之「人類胚胎幹細胞研究倫理指導原則」規定，http://www.most.gov.cn/dtyyw/t20040115_11229.htm (2004/5/1造訪)。

＃我國之「以基因轉殖動物生產之人用藥品的研發生產及測試要點」草案，http://www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/Doc/測試要點草案.doc (2004/5/3造訪)。

＃我國之「基因重組實驗守則」與「基因重組實驗申請同意書」，http://www.nsc.gov.tw/bio/news/acgenerule1.doc、http://www.nsc.gov.tw/bio/news/acgenerule2.doc (2004/5/3造訪)。

＃全國法規資料庫，http://law.moj.gov.tw/fl.asp (2004/5/10造訪)。＃司法院法學資料「判解函釋」檢索系統，

http://nwjirs.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/index.htm (2004/6/2造訪)。＃內政部 2002 年〈世界各大州人口變動及結構估計〉統計資料，

http://www.moi.gov.tw/W3/stat/home.asp (2004/5/29造訪)。＃司法院網站之司法統計資料，http://www.judicial.gov.tw/hq/juds/Sf-6.htm、

http://www.judicial.gov.tw/hq/juds/Se-6.htm、http://www.judicial.gov.tw/hq/juds/Sb-6.htm (2004/6/21造訪)。

＃我國之「人工生殖技術倫理指導綱領」，http://www.doh.gov.tw/NewVersion/content.asp?class_no=115&now_Fod_list_no=1875&array_Fod_list_no=115,&level_no=1&doc_no=7517 (2004/6/26造訪)。

＃我國之「人工協助生殖技術管理辦法」，http://www.doh.gov.tw/NewVersion/content.asp?class_no=45&now_Fod_list_no=5&array_Fod_list_no=45,&level_no=1&doc_no=5050 (2004/6/26造訪)。

＃我國之「胚胎幹細胞研究的倫理規範」，http://www.doh.gov.tw/NewVersion/content.asp?class_no=45&now_fod_list_no=673&array_fod_list_no=45,1,201&level_no=4&doc_no=1285&show=show (2004/6/27造訪)。

參考文獻

243

＃我國之「體細胞治療人體試驗申請與操作規範」，http://www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/doc/體細胞規範-921104公告版.doc (2004/6/27造訪)。

＃我國之「人工生殖法」草案總說明，http://www.doh.gov.tw/NewVersion/content.asp?class_no=45&now_Fod_list_no=1348&array_Fod_list_no=45,5&level_no=2&doc_no=5035 (2004/6/27造訪)。

＃我國「人工生殖法」草案立院委員會審查情形， http://tw.news.yahoo.com/040609/4/pnb4.html (2004/6/27造訪)。

＃我國之「人工生殖法」草案，http://www.doh.gov.tw/NewVersion/content.asp?class_no=45&now_Fod_list_no=1348&array_Fod_list_no=45,5&level_no=2&doc_no=5036 (2003/12/19造訪)。

＃我國之「臍帶血收集及處理作業規範」，http://www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/Doc/臍帶血收集及處理作業規範-公告版 2-定案.doc (2004/6/27造訪)。

※ 英文部分

＊書籍

＃ I. EDWARD ALCAMO, DNA TECHNOLOGY: THE AWESOME SKILL, Academic Press

(2nd ed. 2001). ＃ ANDREA L. BONNICKSEN, CRAFTING A CLONING POLICY: FROM DOLLY TO STEM

CELLS, Georgetown University Press (2002). ＃ JAMES BOYLE, SHAMANS, SOFTWARE, AND SPLEENS: LAW AND THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, Harvard University Press (1996). ＃ Michael C. Brannigan ed., ETHICAL ISSUES IN HUMAN CLONING, Chatham House

Publishers (2001). ＃ TERENCE A. BROWN, GENOMES, Wiley-Liss (2nd ed. 2002). ＃ ALLEN BUCHANAN, DAN W. BROCK, NORMAN DANIELS, & DANIEL WIKLER,

FROM CHANCE TO CHOICE: GENETICS & JUSTICE, Cambridge University Press (2000).

＃ NEIL A. CAMPBELL, & JANE B. REECE, BIOLOGY, Benjamin Cummings (6th ed. 2002).

＃ DANIEL COHEN, CLONING, Twenty-First Century Books (2nd ed. 2002). ＃ RONALD DWORKIN, LIFE’S DOMINION: AN ARGUMENT ABOUT ABORTION,

EUTHANASIA, AND INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, Vintage Books (1993). ＃ JOHN HART ELY, DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST: A THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW,


244

Harvard University Press (1980). ＃ Bryan A. Garner ed., BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, West Group (17th ed. 1999). ＃ Robert P. George ed., GREAT CASES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Princeton

University Press (2000). ＃ SCOTT F. GILBERT, DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, Sinauer Associates (7th ed., 2003). ＃ E. RICHARD GOLD, BODY PARTS: PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE OWNERSHIP OF

HUMAN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS, Georgetown University Press (1996). ＃ DAVID GOODNOUGH, THE DEBATE OVER HUMAN CLONING: A PRO/CON ISSUE,

Enslow Publishers (2003). ＃ GERALD GUNTHER, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Foundation

Press (4th ed. 1986). ＃ GERALD GUNTHER & KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Foundation

Press (13th ed. 1997). ＃ Suzanne Holland, Karen Lebacqz & Laurie Zoloth ed., THE HUMAN EMBRYONIC

STEM CELL DEBATE: SCIENCE, ETHICS, AND PUBLIC POLICY, The MIT Press (2001).

＃ Houghton Mifflin Company ed., THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY, Houghton Mifflin Company (2d ed. 1985).

＃ GARETH JONES, CLONES: THE CLOWNS OF TECHNOLOGY?, Paternoster Press (2001).

＃ LEON R. KASS, LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE DEFENSE OF DIGNITY: THE CHALLENGE FOR BIOETHICS, Encounter Books (2002).

＃ RACHEL KRANZ, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND TECHNOLOGY, Facts on File (2002). ＃ JOHN CHARLES KUNICH, THE NAKED CLONE: HOW CLONING BANS THREATEN OUR

PERSONAL RIGHTS, Praeger (2003). ＃ HWA A. LIM, SEX IS GOOD, WHY CLONE?, Enlighten Noah Publishing (2004). ＃ Barbara MacKinnon ed., HUMAN CLONING: SCIENCE, ETHICS, AND PUBLIC POLICY,

University of Illinois Press (2000). ＃ Gerard Magill ed., GENETICS AND ETHICS: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY, Saint

Louis University Press (2004). ＃ JAMES D. MAUSETH, BOTANY: AN INTRODUCTION TO PLANT BIOLOGY, Saunders

College Publishing (1991). ＃ GLENN MCGEE, THE PERFECT BABY: PARENTHOOD IN THE NEW WORLD OF

CLONING AND GENETICS, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2nd ed. 2000). ＃ Glenn McGee ed., THE HUMAN CLONING DEBATE, Berkeley Hills Books (3rd ed.

2002). ＃ JOHN STUART MILL, ON LIBERTY AND OTHER ESSAYS, Oxford University Press

(John Gray ed., 1998).

參考文獻

245

＃ NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, SCIENTIFIC AND MEDICAL ASPECTS OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE CLONING, National Academy Press (2002).

＃ WILLIAM E. NELSON, FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: FROM POLITICAL PRINCIPLE TO JUDICIAL DOCTRINE, Harvard University Press (1988).

＃ Martha C. Nussbaum & Cass R. Sunstein ed., CLONES AND CLONES: FACTS AND FANTASIES ABOUT HUMAN CLONING ,W. W. Norton & Company (1998).

＃ S. JAY OLSHANSKY & BRUCE A. CARNES, THE QUEST FOR IMMORTALITY: SCIENCE AT THE FRONTIER OF AGING, W. W. Norton & Company (2001).

＃ Gregory E. Pence ed., FLESH OF MY FLESH: THE ETHICS OF CLONING HUMANS, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (1998).

＃ GREGORY E. PENCE, CLASSIC CASES IN MEDICAL ETHICS: ACCOUNTS OF CASES THAT HAVE SHAPED MEDICAL ETHICS, WITH PHILOSOPHICAL, LEGAL, AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUNDS, McGraw-Hill (4th ed. 2004).

＃ WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST, THE SUPREME COURT, Vintage Books (2nd ed. 2001). ＃ MATT RIDLEY, NATURE VIA NURTURE: GENES, EXPERIENCE, & WHAT MAKES US

HUMAN, HarperCollins Publishers (2003). ＃ JOHN A. ROBERTSON, CHILDREN OF CHOICE: FREEDOM AND THE NEW

REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, Princeton University Press (1994). ＃ RACHEL ROTH, MAKING WOMEN PAY: THE HIDDEN COSTS OF FETAL RIGHTS,

Cornell University Press (2000). ＃ JEAN REITH SCHROEDEL, IS THE FETUS A PERSON? A COMPARISON OF POLICIES

ACROSS THE FIFTY STATES, Cornell University Press (2000). ＃ BERNARD SCHWARITZ, A BOOK OF LEGAL LISTS: THE BEST AND WORST IN

AMERICAN LAW, Oxford University Press (1997). ＃ Scientific American Inc. ed., UNDERSTANDING CLONING, Warner Books (2002). ＃ MARY LYNDON SHANLEY, MAKING BABIES, MAKING FAMILIES: WHAT MATTERS

MOST IN AN AGE OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, SURROGACY, ADOPTION, AND SAME-SEX AND UNWED PARENTS, Beacon Press (2001).

＃ JAMES F. SIMON, WHAT KIND OF NATION: THOMAS JEFFERSON, JOHN MARSHALL, AND THE EPIC STRUGGLE TO CREATE A UNITED STATES, Simon & Schuster (2002).

＃ PETER SINGER, RETHINKING LIFE AND DEATH: THE COLLAPSE OF OUR TRADITIONAL ETHICS, St. Martin’s Griffin (1994).

＃ D. PETER SNUSTAD & MICHAEL J. SIMMONS, PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS, John Wiley & Sons (3rd ed. 2003).

＃ BONNIE STEINBOCK, LIFE BEFORE BIRTH: THE MORAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF EMBRYOS AND FETUSES, Oxford University Press (1992).

＃ GREGORY STOCK, REDESIGNING HUMANS: CHOOSING OUR GENES, CHANGING OUR FUTURE, Mariners Books (2002).


246

＃ CASS R. SUNSTEIN, LEGAL REASONING AND POLITICAL CONFLICT, Oxford University Press (1996).

＃ THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, HUMAN CLONING AND HUMAN DIGNITY, Report With A Foreword By Leon R. Kass, PublicAffairs (2002).

＃ THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, BEYOND THERAPY: BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS (2003).

＃ THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, REPRODUCTION & RESPONSIBILITY: THE REGULATION OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGIES (2004).

＃ ALLAN J. TOBIN & JENNIE DUSHECK, ASKING ABOUT LIFE, Harcourt College Publisher (2nd ed. 2001).

＃ LAURENCE H. TRIBE, AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Foundation Press (2nd ed. 1988).

＃ L AURENCE H. TRIBE, AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Foundation Press (3rd ed. 2000).

＊期刊文獻

＃ Sara K. Alexander, Who is Georgia’s Mother? Gestational Surrogacy: A

Formulation for Georgia’s Legislature, 38 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW 395 (2003). ＃ Lori B. Andrews, Is there a Right to Clone? Constitutional Challenges to Bans on

Human Cloning, 11 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND TECHNOLOGY 643 (1998). ＃ Lori B. Andrews, A Conceptual Framework for Genetic Policy: Comparing the

Medical, Public Health, and Fundamental Rights Models, 79 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY 221 (2001).

＃ Lori B. Andrew, The Gene Patent Dilemma: Balancing Commercial Incentives with Health Needs, 2002 HOUSTON JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW AND POLICY 65 (2002).

＃ George J. Annas, Mapping the Human Genome and the Meaning of Monster Mythology, 39 EMORY LAW JOURNAL 629 (1990).

＃ George J. Annas, Human Cloning: A Choice or an Echo?, 23 DAYTON LAW REVIEW 247 (1998).

＃ George J. Annas, Andrews, Lori B. & Isasi, Rosario M., Protecting the Endangered Human: Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterations, 28 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 151 (2002).

＃ J. M. Balkin, What is a Postmodern Constitutionalism?, 90 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 1966 (1992).

＃ William W. Bassett, Private Religious Hospitals: Limitations upon Autonomous

參考文獻

247

Moral Choices in Reproductive Medicine, 17 JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HEALTH LAW AND POLICY 455 (2001).

＃ Helen G. Berrigan, Transsexual Marriage: A Trans-Atlantic Judicial Dialogue, 12 LAW & SEXUALITY 87 (2003).

＃ Barry Brown, Human Cloning and Genetic Engineering: The Case for Proceeding Cautiously, 65 ALBANY LAW REVIEW 649 (2002).

＃ Lisa Sowle Cahill, No Human Cloning: A Social Ethics Perspective, 27 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 487 (1999).

＃ California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning, Cloning Californians?, 53 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL 1143 (2002).

＃ Norman L. Cantor, The Relation between Autonomy-Based and Profound Mentally Disabled Persons, 13 ANNALS OF HEALTH LAW 37 (2004).

＃ Dale Carpenter, Is Lawrence Libertarian?, 88 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1140 (2004).

＃ Helen Y. Chang, My Father is a Woman, Oh No!: The Failure of the Courts to Uphold Individual Substantive Due Process Rights for Transgender Parents under the Guise of the Best Interest of the Child, 43 SANTA CLARA LAW REVIEW 649 (2003).

＃ Laurence Claus, Protecting Rights from Rights: Enumeration Disparagement, and the Ninth Amendment, 79 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 585 (2004).

＃ Daniel Mark Cohen, Cloning and the Constitution, Cloning and the Constitution, Cloning and the Constitution, Cloning and…, 26 NOVA LAW REVIEW 511 (2002).

＃ Christine Corcos, Isabel Corcos & Brian Stockhoff, Double-Take: A Second Look at Cloning, Science Fiction and Law, 59 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW 1041 (1999).

＃ Devon A. Corneal, Limiting the Right to Procreate: State v. Oakley and the Need for Strict Scrunity of Probation Conditions, 33 SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 447 (2003).

＃ Judith F. Daar, The Prospect of Human Cloning: Improving Nature or Dooming the Species?, 33 SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 511 (2003).

＃ Janet L. Dolgin, Cloning Debate, 27 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 473 (1999). ＃ Janet L. Dolgin, Embryonic Discourse: Abortion, Stem Cells and Cloning, 19

ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINe 203 (2004). ＃ Rebecca Dresser, Dementia Research: Ethics and Policy for the Twenty-First

Century, 35 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW 661 (2001). ＃ Jennifer Landrum Elliott, Will Charlie Brown Finally Kick the Football?:

Missouri Enacts the Next Generation of Partial Birth Abortion Restrictions, 44 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 1803 (2000).

＃ Jerry Elmer, Human Genomics: Toward a New Paradigm for Equal-Protection


248

Jurisprudence, Part I, 50 RHODE ISLAND BAR JOURNAL 5 (2002). ＃ Jerry Elmer, Human Genomics: Toward a New Paradigm for Equal-Protection

Jurisprudence, Part II, 50 RHODE ISLAND BAR JOURNAL 11 (2002). ＃ Nanette Elster, Who is the Parent in Cloning?, 27 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 533

(1999). ＃ Kenan Farrell, Where Have All the Young Girls Gone? Preconception Gender

Selection in India and the United States, 13 INDIANA INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW 253 (2002).

＃ Mark Christopher Farrell, Designer DNA for Humans: Biotech Patent Law Made Interesting for the Average Lawyer, 35 GONZAGA LAW REVIEW 515 (1999).

＃ F. Barrett Faulkner, Applying Old Law to New Births: Protecting the Interests of Children Born through New Reproductive Technology, 2 JOURNAL OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW 27 (2003).

＃ Sherylynn Fiandaca, In Vitro Fertilization and Embryos: The Need for International Guidelines, 8 ALBANY LAW JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 337 (1998).

＃ Noel A. Fleming, Navigating the Slippery Slope of Frozen Embryo Disputes: The Case for a Contractual Approach, 75 TEMPLE LAW REVIEW 345 (2002).

＃ John C. Fletcher & Dorothy C. Wertz, Ethics, Law, and Medical Genetics: After the Human Genome is Mapped, 39 EMORY LAW JOURNAL 747 (1990).

＃ Bryn E. Floyd, Regulation of Stem Cell Research: A Recommendation that the United States Adopt the Australian Approach, 13 PACIFIC RIM LAW & POLICY JOURNAL 31 (2004).

＃ Elizabeth Price Foley, The Constitutional Implication of Human Cloning, 42 ARIZONA LAW REVIEW 647 (2000).

＃ Elizabeth Price Foley, Human Cloning and the Right to Reproduce, 65 ALBANY LAW REVIEW 625 (2002).

＃ Elizabeth Price Foley, The Constitutional Implications of a Cloning Society, 32 CUMBERLAND LAW REVIEW 503 (2002).

＃ Clarke D. Forsythe, Legal Perspectives on Cloning: Human Cloning and the Constitution, 32 VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 469 (1998).

＃ Marsha Garrison, Law Making for Baby Making: An Interpretive Approach to the Determination of Legal Parentage, 113 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 835 (2000).

＃ Jason C. Glahn, I Teach You the Superman: Why Congress Cannot Constitutionally Prohibit Genetic Modification, 25 WHITTIER LAW REVIEW 409 (2003).

＃ Jose L. Gonzalez, The Legitimization of Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research under Roe v. Wade, 34 CREIGHTON LAW REVIEW 895 (2001).

參考文獻

249

＃ Barbara E. Graham-Siegenthaler, Principles of Marriage Recognition Applied to Same-Sex Marriage Recognition in Switzerland and Europe, 32 CREIGHTON LAW REVIEW (1998).

＃ Henry T. Greely, Banning “Human Cloning”: A Study in the Difficulties of Defining Science, 8 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY LAW JOURNAL 131 (1998).

＃ Susan Greenlee, Dolly’s Legacy to Human Cloning: International Legal Responses and Potential Human Rights Violations, 18 WISCONSIN INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 537 (2000).

＃ Mark J. Hanson, Cloning for Therapeutic Purposes: Ethical and Policy Considerations, 32 UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO LAW REVIEW 355 (2001).

＃ Meredith R. Henderson, Stengberg v. Carhart: “Partial-Birth” Abortion Bans and the Supreme Court’s Rejection of the “Methodical” Erasure of the Right to Abortion, 79 NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW 1127 (2001).

＃ Karen Henry, Everyone Knows Men and Women are Different, So What?, 32 SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 335 (2003).

＃ Erika M. Hiester, Child Support Statues and the Father’s Right Not to Procreate, 2 AVE MARIA LAW REVIEW 213 (2004).

＃ Laura J. Hilmert, Cloning Human Organs: Potential Sources and Property Implications, 77 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 363 (2002).

＃ Sharona Hoffman, The Use of Placebos in Clinical Trials: Responsible Research or Unethical Practice?, 33 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW 449 (2001).

＃ Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 23 YALE LAW JOURNAL 16 (1913).

＃ Stephanie J. Hong, And “Cloning” Makes Three: A Constitutional Comparison between Cloning and Other Assisted Reproductive Technologies, 26 HASTINGS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW QUARTERLY 741 (1999).

＃ Matthew B. Hsu, Banning Human Cloning: An Acceptable Limit on Scientific Inquiry or an Unconstitutional Restriction of Symbolic Speech?, 87 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 2399 (1999).

＃ Peter H. Huang, Herd Behavior in Designer Genes, 34 WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW 639 (1999).

＃ Donald C. Hubin, Daddy Dilemmas: Untangling the Puzzles of Paternity, 13 CORNELL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY 29 (2003).

＃ Lisa C. Ikemoto, The In/Fertile, the Too Fertile, and the Dysfertile, 47 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL 1007 (1996).

＃ Kimberly M. Jackson, Well, Hello Dolly! The Advent of Cloning Legislation and Its Constitutional Implications, 52 SMU LAW REVIEW 283 (1999).


250

＃ Rith Jones, Inequality from Gender-Neutral Laws: Why Must Male Victims of Statutory Rape Pay Child Support for Children Resulting from Their Victimization?, 36 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW 411 (2002).

＃ Charlene Kalebic, The Constitutional Question of Cloning Humans: Duplication or Procreation? An Examination of the Constitutional Right to Procreate, 8 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY LAW JOURNAL 229 (1998).

＃ F.M. Kamm,, Cloning and Harm to Offspring, 4 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW JOURNAL OF LEGISLATION AND PUBLIC POLICY 65 (2000).

＃ Leon R. Kass, Triumph or Tragedy? The Moral Meaning of Genetic Technology, 45 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF JURISPRUDENCE 1 (2000).

＃ Katheryn D. Katz, The Clonal Child: Procreative Liberty and Asexual Reproduction, 8 ALBANY LAW JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 1 (1997).

＃ Katheryn D. Katz, Snowflake Adoptions and Orphan Embryos: The Legal Implications of Embryo Donation, 18 WISCONSIN WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL 179 (2003).

＃ Eydith J. Kaufman, Genetic Engineering and the Human Future Academic Analysis: Hilter on the Horizon: An Analysis of Germ-Line Genetic Therapy, 3 JOURNAL OF LAW & SOCIAL CHALLENGES 1 (1999).

＃ M. Cathleen Kaveny, Cloning and Positive Liberty, 13 NOTRE DAME JOURNAL OF LAW, ETHICS & PUBLIC POLICY 15 (1999).

＃ Charles P. Kindregan & Maureen McBrien, Embryo Donation: Unresolved Legal Issues in the Transfer of Surplus Cryopreserved Embryos, 49 VILLANOVA LAW REVIEW 169 (2004).

＃ Kristine S. Knaplund, Postmortem Conception and a Father's Last Will, 46 ARIZONA LAW REVIEW 91 (2004).

＃ Sherry M. Knowles & Stephanie D. Adams, Who Owns My DNA?: The National and International Intellectual Property Laws on Human Embryonic Tissue and Cloning, 32 CUMBERLAND LAW REVIEW 475 (2001).

＃ Sophia Kolehmainen, Human Cloning: Brave New Mistake, 37 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 557 (1999).

＃ Lowell Ben Krahn, Cloning, Public Policy and the Constitution, 21 THE JOHN MARSHALL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER & INFORMATION LAW 271 (2003).

＃ John Charles Kunich, Mother Frankenstein, Doctor Nature, and the Environmental Law of Genetic Engineering, 74 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 807 (2001).

＃ John Charles Kunich, The Naked Clone, 91 KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL 1 (2002). ＃ Allison Lampert, An Andy Warhol Society-First Coca-Cola, Now Humans: An

Examination of Whether a Ban on Human Cloning Violates Procreative Liberty,

參考文獻

251

16 SAINT JOHN'S JOURNAL OF LEGAL COMMENTARY 245 (2002). ＃ Anne Lawton, Regulating Genetic Destiny: A Comparative Study of Legal

Constraints in Europe and the United States, 11 EMORY INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 365 (1997).

＃ Anne Lawton, The Frankenstein Controversy: The Constitutionality of a Federal Ban on Cloning, 87 KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL 277 (1998).

＃ Leslie I. Lax, Is the United States Falling Behind? The Legal Recognition of Post-Operative Transsexuals’ Acquired Sex in the United States and Abroad, 7 QUINNIPIAC HEALTH LAW JOURNAL 123 (2003).

＃ Paul Lesko & Kevin Buckley, Attack of the Clones…and the Issues of Clones, 3 COLUMBIA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW 1 (2002).

＃ Justyn Lezin, (Mis)Conceptions: Unjust Limitations on Legally Unmarried Woman’s Access to Reproductive Technology and Their Use of Known Donors, 14 HASTINGS WOMAN’S LAW JOURNAL 185 (2003).

＃ Raizel Liebler, Are You My Parent? Are You My Child? The Role of Genetics and Race in Defining Relationships after Reproductive Technological Mistakes, 5 DEPAUL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE LAW 15 (2002).

＃ Peter J. Longo, The Human Genome Project’s Threat to the Human Constitution: Protections from Nebraska Constitutionalism, 33 CREIGHTON LAW REVIEW 3 (1999).

＃ Charles I. Lugosi, Respecting Human Life in 21st Century America: A Moral Perspective to Extend Civil Rights to the Unborn from Creation to Natural Death, 48 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 425 (2004).

＃ Mary B. Mahowald, Genes, Clones, and Gender Equality, 3 DEPAUL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE LAW 495 (2000).

＃ Michael J. Malinowski, Choosing the Genetic Makeup of Children: Our Eugenics Past--Present, and Future?, 36 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW 125 (2003).

＃ Emily Marden & Dorothy Nelkin, Cloning: A Business without Regulation, 27 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 569 (1999).

＃ Maureen McBrien, Human Cloning: Beyond the Realm of the Constitutional Right to Procreative Liberty, 21 THE BUFFALO PUBLIC INTEREST LAW JOURNAL 107 (2002).

＃ Melanie G. McCulley, The Male Abortion: The Putative Father’s Right to Terminate His Interests in and Obligations to the Unborn Child, 7 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY 1 (1998).

＃ Eileen L. McDonagh, My Body, My Consent: Securing the Constitutional Right to Abortion Funding, 62 ALBANY LAW REVIEW 1057 (1999).

＃ Margaret R. McLean, What’s in a Name? “Nuclear Transplantation “ and the


252

Ethics of Stem Cell Research, 53 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL 1017 (2002). ＃ Peter M. Mellette, Emily W.G. Towey & J. Vaden Hunt, Health Care Law, 37

UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LAW REVIEW 199 (2002). ＃ Richard A. Merrill & Bryan J. Rose, FDA Regulation of Human Cloning:

Usurpation or Statesmanship?, 15 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND TECHNOLOGY 85 (2001).

＃ Richard A. Merrill, Human Tissues and Reproductive Cloning: New Technologies Challenge FDA, 3 HOUSTON JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW AND POLICY 1 (2002).

＃ Coby S. Nixon, Human Cloning and the Commerce Power: In Light of United States v. Lopez, Congress Can-But Should Not-Regulate Human Cloning, 37 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW 295 (2002).

＃ David Orentlicher, Cloning and the Preservation of Family Integrity, 59 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW 1019 (1999).

＃ David Orentlicher, Beyond Cloning: Expanding Reproductive Options for Same-Sex Couples, 66 BROOKLYN LAW REVIEW 651 (2000).

＃ Taiwo A. Oriola, Ethical and Legal Issues in Singapore Biomedical Research, 11 PACIFIC RIM LAW & POLICY JOURNAL 497 (2002).

＃ Tracey S. Pachman, Disputes Over Frozen Preembryos and the “Right Not to be a Parent”, 12 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW 128 (2003).

＃ Larry I. Palmer, Disease Management and Liability in the Human Genome Era, 47 VILLANOVA LAW REVIEW 1 (2002).

＃ Larry I. Palmer, Genetic Health and Eugenics Precedents: A Voice of Caution, 30 FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 237 (2003).

＃ Lynn M. Paltrow, Pregnant Drug Users, Fetal Persons, and the Threat to Roe v. Wade, 62 ALBANY LAW REVIEW 999 (1999).

＃ Frederick R. Parker, Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill: An Analysis of the Amicus Curiae Briefs and the Supreme Court’s Majority and Concurring Opinions, 43 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 469 (1999).

＃ Susan P. Pauker, The Challenges of Genetic Medicine to the Patient-Physician Relationship, 26 JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE AND ETHICS 221 (1998).

＃ E.D. Pellegrino, Balancing Science, Ethics and Politics: Stem Cell Research, A Paradigm Case, 18 JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HEALTH LAW AND POLICY 591 (2002).

＃ Shawn E. Peterson, A Comprehensive National Policy to Stop Human Cloning: An Analysis of the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001 with Recommendations for Federal and State Legislatures, 17 NOTRE DAME JOURNAL OF LAW, ETHICS & PUBLIC POLICY 217 (2003).

＃ Kelly M. Plummer, Ending Parents’ Unlimited Power to Choose: Legislation is

參考文獻

253

Necessary to Prohibit Parents’ Selection of Their Children’s Sex and Characteristics, 47 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 517 (2003).

＃ Deana A. Pollard, Wrongful Analysis in Wrongful Life Jurisprudence, 55 ALABAMA LAW REVIEW 327 (2004).

＃ Elizabeth C. Price, Does the FDA Have Authority to Regulate Human Cloning?, 11 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY 619 (1998).

＃ Maria S. Quintero, Cloning Californians? Report of the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning and Recent Cloning-Related Legislation, 18 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER AND HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 417 (2002).

＃ Radhika Rao, What’s So Strange about Human Cloning?, 53 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL 1007 (2002).

＃ Val D. Ricks, Abortion and Latter-Day Saint Experiences with Children and Law, 1 MARGINS 523 (2001).

＃ Michael D. Rivard, Toward a General Theory of Constitutional Personhood: A Theory of Constitutional Personhood for Transgenic Humanoid Species, 39 UCLA LAW REVIEW 1425 (1992).

＃ John A. Robertson, Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy and Childbirth, 69 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 405 (1983).

＃ John A. Robertson, Technology and Motherhood: Legal and Ethical Issues in Human Egg Donation, 39 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW 1 (1989).

＃ John A. Robertson, Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Rights in the Beginning: The Legal Status of Early Embryos, 76 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 437 (1990).

＃ John A. Robertson, Why Human Reproductive Cloning Should Not in All Cases be Prohibited, 4 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW JOURNAL OF LEGISLATION AND PUBLIC POLICY 35 (2000).

＃ John A. Robertson, Procreative Liberty in the Era of Genomics, 29 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 439 (2003).

＃ Gregory J. Rokosz, Human Cloning: Is the Reach of FDA Authority Too Far a Stretch?, 30 SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 464 (2000).

＃ Andre P. Rose, Reproductive Misconception: Why Cloning is Not Just Another Assisted Reproductive Technology, 48 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 1133 (1999).

＃ Galen J. Roush & Sharona Hoffman, Birth after Death: Perpetuities and the New Reproductive Technologies, 38 GEORGIA LAW REVIEW 575 (2004).

＃ Helena Gail Rubinstein, If I am Only for Myself, What am I? A Communitarian Look at the Privacy Statement, 25 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE 203 (1999).

＃ Lisa Shaw Roy, Roe and the New Frontier, 27 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW &


254

PUBLIC POLICY 339 (2003). ＃ Hannah A. Saona, The Protection of Reproductive Right under International Law:

The Bush Administration’s Policy Shift and China’s Family Planning Practices, 13 PACIFIC RIM LAW & POLICY JOURNAL 229 (2004).

＃ Kai Schadbach, The Benefits of Comparative Law: A Continental European View, 16 BOSTON UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 331 (1998).

＃ Amanda R. Schehr, State v. Oakley: Infringing on Women’s Reproductive Rights, 18 WISCONSIN WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL 281 (2003).

＃ Charity Schiller, Stem Cell Research and Conditional Federal Funding: Do State Laws Allowing More Extensive Research Pose a Problem for Federalism?, 31 PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW 1017 (2004).

＃ Elizabeth L. Shanin, International Response to Human Cloning, 3 CHICAGO JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 255 (2002).

＃ Michael H. Shapiro, Does Technological Enhancement of Human Traits Threaten Human Equality and Democracy?, 39 SAN DIEGO LAW REVIEW 769 (2002).

＃ Andrea M. Sharrin, Potential Fathers and Abortion: A Women’s Womb is Not a Man’s Castle, 55 BROOKLYN LAW REVIEW 1359 (1990).

＃ Yuriko Mary Shikai, Don’t be Swept by Mass Hysteria: The Benefits of Human Reproductive Cloning and Its Future, 33 SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 259 (2004).

＃ Pedro F. Silva-Ruiz, The Protection of Persons in Medical Research and Cloning of Human Beings, 46 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW 151 (1998).

＃ Lee M. Silver, Popular Cloning versus Scientific Cloning in Ethical Debates, 4 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW JOURNAL OF LEGISLATION AND PUBLIC POLICY 47 (2000).

＃ Shannon H. Smith, Ignorance is Not Bliss: Why a Ban on Human Cloning is Unacceptable, 9 HEALTH MATRIX: JOURNAL OF LAW-MEDICINE 311 (1999).

＃ David M. Smolin, Should a Ban on Reproductive Cloning Include a Ban on Cloning for Purposes of Research or Therapy?, 32 CUMBERLAND LAW REVIEW 487 (2002).

＃ Bonnie Steinbock, Sperm as Property, 6 STANFORD LAW & POLICY REVIEW 57 (1995).

＃ Mark Strasser, Sex, Law, and the Scared Precincts of the Marital Bedroom: On State and Federal Right to Privacy Jurisprudence, 14 NOTRE DAME JOURNAL OF LAW, ETHICS & PUBLIC POLICY 753 (2000).

＃ Cass R. Sunstein, Regulation: Is Tobacoo a Drug? Administrative Agencies as Common Law Courts, 47 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 1013 (1998).

＃ Cass R. Sunstein, Is There a Constitutional Right to Clone?, 53 HASTINGS LAW

參考文獻

255

JOURNAL 987 (2002). ＃ Stephanie Tai, Friendly Science: Medical, Scientific, and Technical Amici before

the Supreme Court, 78 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY 789 (2000). ＃ Greg Taylor, Same-Sex Unions and the Law: The New Gay and Lesbian

Partnerships Law in Germany, 41 ALBERTA LAW REVIEW 573 (2003). ＃ Roger H. Taylor, The Fear of Drawing the Line at Cloning, 9 BOSTON UNIVERSITY

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LAW 379 (2003). ＃ Mary A. Totz, What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander: Toward

Recognition of Men’s Reproductive Rights, 15 THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 141 (1994).

＃ Paul Tully, Dollywood is not just a Theme Park in Tennessee Anymore: Unwarranted Prohibitory Human Cloning Legislation and Policy Guidelines for a Regulatory Approach to Cloning, 31 THE JOHN MARSHALL LAW REVIEW 1385 (1998).

＃ Melanie Jean Vartabedian, Goodwin v. Turner & Gerber v. Hickman: Should Prisons Have the Right to Procreate?, 5 JOURNAL OF LAW & FAMILY STUDIES 393 (2003).

＃ Andreas S. Voss, The Right to Privacy & Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Comparative Study of the Law of Germany and the U.S., 21 NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW 229 (2002).

＃ Samuel D. Warren & Louis D. Brandies, The Right to Privacy, 4 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 193 (1890).

＃ Martin King Whyte, Human Rights Trends and Coercive Family Planning in the PRC, Vol.34, no.8 ISSUES & STUDIES 1 (1998).

＃ Bruce L. Wilder, Assisted Reproduction Technology: Trends and Suggestions for the Developing Law, 18 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF MATRIMONIAL LAWYERS 177 (2002).

＃ Christine Willgoos, FDA Regulation: An Answer to the Question of Human Cloning and Germline Gene Therapy, 27 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE 101 (2001).

＃ R. George Wright, Second Thoughts: How Human Cloning Can Promote Human Dignity, 35 VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1 (2000).

＃ R. George Wright, Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves: The Legal Implications of a Kantian Principle, 36 UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LAW REVIEW 271 (2002).

＃ Lawrence Wu, Family Planning through Human Cloning: Is There a Fundamental Right?, 98 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW 1461 (1998).

＃ Diane K. Yang, What’s Mine is Mine, but What’s Yours Should Also be Mine: An


256

Analysis of State Statutes That Mandate the Implantation of Frozen Preembryos, 10 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY 587 (2002).

＃ Jennifer H. Yen, Is My Baby "Defective"? Fetal Genetic Testing as Part of a Public Health Care Plan, 36 SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 391 (2003).

＃ June Mary Zekan Makdisi, The Slide from Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research to Reproductive Cloning: Ethical Decision-Making and the Ban on Federal Funding, 34 RUTGERS LAW JOURNAL 463 (2003).

＊網路資源

◎ 有著作者

＃ Vikram David Amar, The Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act: If It is Enjoined but Then Ultimately Uphold, Can Doctors Who Violated It While the Injunction was in Effect be Punished?, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/amar/20031114.html、http://writ.news.findlaw.com/amar/20031128.html (last visited Mar. 29, 2004).

＃ Patrick Chesne et al., Cloned Rabbits Produced by Nuclear Transfer from Adult Somatic Cells, available at http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nbt/journal/v20/n4/abs/nbt0402-366.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2004).

＃ Sherry F. Colb, Why the Senate Should Refuse Even to Consider the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2001, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20010606.html (last visited Mar. 29, 2004).

＃ Sherry F. Colb, Why the Cloned Cat Makes the Case against Human Cloning, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20020227.html (last visited Feb. 22, 2004).

＃ Sherry F. Colb, Sending out Partial Birth Announcements: Symbolism and Deception by Pro-Life Legislators, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20030618.html (last visited Mar. 29, 2004).

＃ David Cyranoski, Korea's Stem-Cell Stars Dogged by Suspicion of Ethical Breach, available at http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v429/n6987/full/429003a_fs.html (last visited Mar. 1, 2004).

＃ David Cyranoski, Stem-Cell Research: Crunch Time for Korea's Cloners, available at http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v429/n6987/full/

參考文獻

257

429012a_fs.html (last visited Mar. 1, 2004). ＃ Theo Emery, Same-Sex Couple Marry in Massachusetts, available at

http://news.public.findlaw.com/family_law/ap_stories/other/1110/5-17-2004/20040517070009_23.html (last visited Mar. 26, 2004).

＃ Joel B. Grossman, The 200th Anniversary of Marbury v. Madison: The Reasons We Should Still Care about the Decision, and the Lingering Question It Left behind, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20030224_grossman.html (last visited Jan. 29, 2004).

＃ Julie Hilden, The Over-Hyping of Human Cloning: Why the Legal and Ethical Issues It Poses are Likely to be Relatively Limited, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20021230.html (last visited Feb. 22, 2004).

＃ HUGO, Statement on the Principled Conduct of Genetics Research, available at http://www.hugo-international.org/hugo/conduct.htm (last visited Apr. 12, 2004).

＃ Yoko Kato et al., Eight Calves Cloned from Somatic Cells of a Single Adult, available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/282/5396/2095?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&searchid=1080766761381_2438&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&volume=282&firstpage=2095&fdate=10/1/1995&tdate=3/31/2004 (last visited Apr. 1, 2004).

＃ Edward Lazarus, The New Anti-"Partial Birth Abortion" Legislation: Is It a Political Watershed, or Not?, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/lazarus/20031030.html (last visited Mar. 29, 2004).

＃ NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION, CLONING HUMAN BEINGS (June 1997), available at http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/pubs/cloning1/cloning.pdf (last visited Apr. 11, 2004),

＃ National Human Genome Research Institute, About the Human Genome Project, available at http://www.genome.gov/10001772 (last visited Feb. 9, 2004).

＃ NewScientist, ‘Virgin Birth’ Method Promises Ethical Stem Cells, available at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993654 (last visited Mar. 6, 2004).

＃ NewScientist, Embryo Stem Cells Turn into Eggs, available at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993688 (last visited Mar. 6, 2004).

＃ NewScientist, Stem Cells Can Become ‘Normal Sperm’, available at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993700 (last visited Mar. 6, 2004).


258

＃ NewScientist, Dolly Lab to Create ‘Virgin birth’ Embryos, available at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993815 (last visited Mar. 6, 2004).

＃ NewScientist, ‘Virgin Birth’ Mammal Rewrites Rules of Biology, available at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994909 (last visited Mar. 6, 2004).

＃ Elizabeth Pennisi & Gretchen Vogel, Clones: A Hard Act to Follow, available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/288/5472/1722?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Neti+and+Ditto&searchid=1081270374141_8615&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&fdate=10/1/1995&tdate=4/30/2004 (last visited Apr. 6, 2004).

＃ Jeremy RifiKin, The Biotech Century: Genetic Commerce and the Dawn of a New Era, available at http://www.viewingspace.com/genetics_culture/pages_genetics_culture/gc_w03/rifkin_biotech_cent.htm (last visited Jul. 13).

＃ Gerald P. Shatten et al., Clonal Propagation of Primate Offspring by Embryo Splitting, available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/287/5451/317?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Tetra&searchid=1081272560490_8737&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&fdate=10/1/1995&tdate=4/30/2004 (last visited Apr. 6, 2004).

＃ Taeyoung Shin et al., A Cat Clone by Nuclear Transplantation, available at http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v415/n6874/full/nature723_fs.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2004).

＃ THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, HUMAN CLONING AND HUMAN DIGNITY: THE REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/cloningreport/pcbe_cloning_report.pdf (last visited Apr. 12, 2004).

＃ THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, BEYOND THERAPY: BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy/index.html (last visited Jun. 2, 2004).

＃ THE PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, REPRODUCTION & RESPONSIBILITY: THE REGULATION OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGIES, available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/reproductionandresponsibility/index.html (last visited Jun. 6, 2004).

＃ UNESCO, Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and the Protection of Human Rights, available at

參考文獻

259

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php@URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (last visited Apr. 12, 2004).

＃ T. Wakayama & R.Yanagimachi et al., Full-Term Development of Mice from Enucleated Oocytes Injected with Cumulus Cell Nuclei, available at http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v394/n6691/abs/394369a0_fs.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2004).

＃ Alec Walen, Cloning for Research and Therapy, not to Produce Children: The President’s Council Weighs in on Banning versus Allowing It, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20020725_walen.html (last visited Feb. 22, 2004).

＃ Alec Walen, An Alternative to the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act: The Preferable, Constitutional Legislation Congress Declined to Enact, available at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20030616_walen.html (last visited Mar. 29, 2004).

＃ J. D. Watson & F. H. C. Crick, Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid, Nature Vol. 171, 737 (1953), available at http://biocrs.biomed.brown.edu/Books/Chapters/Ch%208/DH-Paper.html (last visited Jul. 13).

＃ Sheng Hui Zhen et al., Embryonic Stem Cells Generated by Nuclear Transfer of Human Somatic Nuclei into Rabbit Oocytes, available at http://www.cell-research.com/20034/2003-116/2003-4-05-ShengHZ.htm (last visited Mar. 8, 2004).

◎ 無著作者 (依引述順序)

＃ HIPAA與美國各部門之 privacy rule，http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa、http://www.ahrq.gov、http://www.cdc.gov/nip/registry/hipaa7.htm、http://www.fda.gov、http://www.ihs.gov/AdminMngrResources/HIPAA/index.cfm、http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov、http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov、http://www.hipaa.samhsa.gov (last visited Feb. 11, 2004).

＃ HGP有關計畫，http://www.genome.gov/10001477、 http://www.genome.gov/10001476、http://www.genome.gov/10001475、http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/About/ (last visited Feb. 11, 2004).

＃完整 HGP網站，http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/guide/human/ (last visited Feb. 11, 2004).

＃澳洲博物館複製袋狼之爭議，http://www.amonline.net.au/thylacine/ (last visited Mar. 23, 2004).


260

＃諾貝爾 e博物館關於 Hans Spemann之介紹，http://www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1935/spemann-bio.html (last visited Mar. 28, 2004).

＃複製技術之歷史年代，http://www.reproductivecloning.net/hosting/waite/ (last visited Mar. 31, 2004).

＃複製名詞之首次使用，http://www.genesage.com/professionals/geneletter/archives/historyofcloning.html、http://home.hawaii.rr.com/johns/history.htm (last visited Mar. 31, 2004).

＃複製鼠 Cumulina之介紹，http://www.hawaii.edu/ur/News_Releases/NR_May00/cumulina.html (last visited Apr. 1, 2004).

＃複製貓 Cc (Carbon Copy) 之介紹，http://www.tamu.edu/aggiedaily/press/020214cat_pics.html、http://www.usatoday.com/news/science/2003-01-21-cloned-cats_x.htm (last visited Apr. 1, 2004).

＃人類複製之歷史簡要，http://www.stedwards.edu/newc/capstone/sp2000/biotechnology/history.htm (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃ Richard Seed之複製人類宣稱，http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9801/07/cloning.folo/ (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃ Kim Seung-bo與 Lee Bo-yeon複製出人類胚胎，http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/276090.stm (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃先進細胞科技公司複製出人類胚胎，http://www.advancedcell.com/2001-11-25.htm (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃「複製權利聯合陣線」 (Clone Rights United Front) ，http://www.clonerights.com/history_of_the_movement.htm (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃「複製人基金會」 (The Human Cloning Foundation, HCF) ，http://www.humancloning.org/about.php (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃「複製協助」公司 (Clonaid) ，http://www.clonaid.com/news.php (last visited Apr. 2, 2004).

＃ Panayiotis Michael Zavos之任職與簡介，http://www.aia-zavos.com/ (last visited Apr. 6, 2004).

＃二 OO三年七月十八日定案的歐盟憲法草案，http://european-convention.eu.int/docs/Treaty/cv00850.en03.pdf (last visited Mar. 1, 2004).

＃歐盟整合之各階段， http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Treaties/Treaty_Const.htm (last visited Mar.

參考文獻

261

2, 2004). ＃紐倫堡法典，http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html (last visited Apr.

15, 2004). ＃赫爾辛基宣言，http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/helsinki.html (last visited Apr. 15,

2004). ＃貝爾蒙特報告，http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html (last visited Apr.

15, 2004). ＃美國 HHS網站，http://www.hhs.gov/about/index.html (last visited Apr. 7, 2004). ＃美國 FDA網站，http://www.fda.gov/、http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/、

http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fdcact/fdcact1.htm、http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/phsvcact/sec262.htm (last visited Apr. 9, 2004).

＃美國 NBAC網站，http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/about/eo12975.htm、http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/about/amendment.htm、http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/about/further.htm、http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/nbac_extended.html、http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/about/nbacroster.htm、http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/about/nbaccharter.pdf (last visited Apr. 11, 2004).

＃美國 PCBE網站，http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/executive.html、http://www.bioethics.gov/、http://www.bioethics.gov/about/executive2.html、http://www.bioethics.gov/about/whpress.html、http://www.bioethics.gov/about/members.html (last visited Apr. 12, 2004).

＃美國國會圖書館資訊系統，http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c108query.html (last visited Jun. 14, 2004).

＃各州州法自Lexis系統查獲，http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe (last visited Jun. 18, 2004).


262

Documents

參考文獻 - nccur.lib.nccu.edu.twnccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/32784/11/65102011.pdf · ＃ 李震山，〈論個人資料保護－以人體基因資訊為例〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》

參考文獻 - nccur.lib.nccu.edu.twnccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/32784/11/65102011.pdf · ＃李震山，〈論個人資料保護－以人體基因資訊為例〉，載於《月旦法學雜誌》