Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 of 185
Flow Artifacts & Magnetic
Resonance Angiography
Hsiao-Wen Chung (鍾孝文), Ph.D., Professor
Dept. Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Univ.
Dept. Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital
2 of 185
Blood in MRI
• Sometimes bright (strong signal)
• Sometimes dark (no signal)
• Different from in vitro -- artifacts ?
3 of 185
Bright Blood & Black Blood in MRI
Gradient echo Spin echo
4 of 185
Blood Flow Artifacts
• Flow-related enhancement
– Bright blood in gradient echo
• Flow void (spin-echo)
• Displacement artifacts
5 of 185
Flow-Related Enhancement
Neck Abdomen
6 of 185
Bright Blood in MRI
• Prominent in T1-weighted image
• Only in through-plane flow
• Slice-dependent in multi-slice
scans
7 of 185
Through-plane & In-plane Flow
Often bright Not too bright
image slice
vessel
8 of 185
Multi-slice Brightness
Brighter towards upstream
9 of 185
MRI Image Formation
• Magnetization
• RF excitation
• Spatial encoding repeat N times
• Signal receiving
• Image calculation
10 of 185
Bright Blood in MRI
• Prominent in T1-weighted image
• Only in through-plane flow
• Slice-dependent in multi-slice
scans
11 of 185
2D Gradient-echo Sequence
t
t
t
t
...
RF
Gs
Gp
Gr
12 of 185
MRI Sequence Diagram
Repeat many times
RF t
t
t
...
...
...
TR
Gp
Gr
13 of 185
Magnetization Changes in Sequence
RF t
t
...
...
short TR
z’
y’ x’
Gr
14 of 185
Saturation Phenomena at Short TR
TR
Sig
na
ls
short T1
long T1
T1WI : TR ~ 600
15 of 185
Effects of T1 on Signals
• Short TR no time for T1 recovery
low signal saturation
• “Saturation” effect
• TR ~ 200 msec: more or less
16 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
RF excitation
t RF
image slice
vessel blood
17 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
Signal receiving and T1 recovery
t RF
18 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
T1 recovery
t RF
19 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
Next RF excitation
t RF
20 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
“Yellow” part not excited previously !
t RF
21 of 185
Magnetization Changes in Sequence
RF t
t
...
...
short TR
z’
y’ x’
Gr
22 of 185
Saturation in Blood Flow
• Static tissue somehow saturated
• Flowing blood less saturated
• Less saturation = bright signal
• Flow-related enhancement (FRE)
23 of 185
Bright Blood in Abdomen
Flow-related enhancement on T1WI
1.5 Tesla
GE Signa
Gradient-echo
Aorta & IVC
especially bright
on T1WI
24 of 185
Shortened T1 with Flow ?
• Bright signal at short TR
• Found in 1951 by Suryan G
• 1946: NMR, 1973: MR imaging
25 of 185
What Affect FRE ?
• TR selection
• Velocity and slice thickness
• Flip angle
• Velocity distribution in vessel
26 of 185
FRE vs. Velocity & Slice Thickness
Blood flow
slow
fast
27 of 185
What Affect FRE ?
• TR selection
• Velocity and slice thickness
• Flip angle
• Velocity distribution in vessel
28 of 185
Flip Angle Effects
• FRE generally larger at large flip
angle (T1-weighted)
• Much more complicated in reality
• Will be addressed later
29 of 185
Flip Angle Controls PD or T1 Contrast
T1 weighting PD weighting
z'
y'
x'
Bo Bo z'
y'
x'
Large angle:
recover from 0
Small angle:
little room for
recovery
30 of 185
What Affect FRE ?
• TR selection
• Velocity and slice thickness
• Flip angle
• Velocity distribution in vessel
31 of 185
No Bulk Blood Flow in Vessel !
Different FRE in one single vessel
laminar
flow
32 of 185
Bright Blood in MRI
• Prominent in T1-weighted image
• Only in through-plane flow
• Slice-dependent in multi-slice
scans ?
33 of 185
Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena
Exciting the first slice
t RF
image slice
vessel
TR
34 of 185
Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena
Exciting the second slice
t RF
TR
image slice
vessel
35 of 185
Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena
Exciting the third slice
t RF
TR
image slice
vessel
36 of 185
Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena
Exciting the first slice again
t RF
Prominent FRE
TR
image slice
vessel
37 of 185
Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena
Some blood already saturated due to first RF
t RF
TR
No prominent FRE
image slice
vessel
38 of 185
Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena
Most blood saturated due to two previous RFs
t RF
TR
image slice
vessel
No prominent FRE
39 of 185
Multi-slice Brightness
Brighter toward upstream
40 of 185
Multi-slice FRE
• Prominent FRE toward upstream
• Especially the first “entry” slice
– Entry slice phenomena
• True only in sequential scan
41 of 185
Entry-Slice FRE Phenomena
Entry slice Inner slice
42 of 185
FRE & Slice Order
• Sequential & interleave different
• FRE too complicated in
interleaving scan omitted
• But it is an artifact anyway !
43 of 185
Sequential & Interleave Scan
FRE substantially different
image slice Sequential: 4 3 2 1
Interleave: 4 2 3 1
44 of 185
Other FRE Artifacts
• Flow ~ motion, motion ghosts
• FRE leads to strong blood signal,
hence bright ghosts as well
• How to eliminate FRE ?
45 of 185
FRE Combined with Motion Ghosts
Bright blood and strong ghosts of aorta
Strong enhancement
leads to obvious
motion ghosts !
46 of 185
Eliminating FRE Artifacts
• Reduce upstream blood signals
– Inflow saturation
• Ghosts from blood flow motion
also removed
47 of 185
Inflow Saturation
• Excite upstream of the slice
• Immediate select the slice
• Blood saturated before flowing into
the image slice
• No signals black blood
48 of 185
Inflow Saturation Principle
90
RF
Gz
Gy
Gx
t
t
t
t
gradient echo saturate
90 a
image slice
SAT bands
49 of 185
Multi-directional Inflow Saturation
Operator selectable, or pre-selected in a protocol
SAT bands
Image volume
2 bands along each
of the 3 directions
6 SAT bands
50 of 185
Superior Inflow Saturation
No Sat With Sat
51 of 185
Inferior Inflow Saturation
No Sat With Sat
52 of 185
Comparison of Sup/Inf SAT
Aorta & IVC both darkened after SAT
53 of 185
Note : Not Only These
• We discussed only flow effects
• Not the compositions of blood !
• Fresh blood? Fresh blood clot? Old
blood clot? Scar? Out of the scope of
this course
54 of 185
Artifact Can Be Useful
• If the blood signal is so bright that
the static tissue looks no signal …
• Image contains only blood vessels ?
• Time Of Flight MR angiography !
55 of 185
Artifacts Can Be Useful
Image would contain only blood vessels !
Adjust scanning
parameters to emphasize
enhancement and to
suppress static tissue
signals
56 of 185
Time-of-Flight MR Angiogram
Angiography using bright blood signals
57 of 185
Time-of-Flight Magnetic
Resonance Angiography
Hsiao-Wen Chung (鍾孝文), Ph.D., Professor
Dept. Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Univ.
Dept. Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital
58 of 185
Vessel Bright, Other Dark
• Time Of Flight MR angiography
– No contrast agents used
– No subtraction used
– Completely noninvasive
59 of 185
MIP MRA in Circle of Willis
Axial view Sagittal oblique view
60 of 185
Comparison: Invasive X-ray Angio
Interventional radiology (diagnosis & therapy)
61 of 185
Blood Behavior in MRI
• Static tissue suppress FRE
– Inflow saturation
• Blood vessels enhance FRE
– TOF MR Angiogram
62 of 185
From FRE To MRA
• From multiple slices to multi-angle
projection
• Maximum Intensity Projection
– MIP : computer calculation
• Volume (surface) rendering …
63 of 185
Time-of-Flight MR Angiogram
… using bright blood signals
?
64 of 185
Maximum Intensity Projection
Any orientation, computer calculation
65 of 185
2D TOF MRA
Carotid arteries at three different angles
66 of 185
MRA Lecture Over ?
• No. Not that easy !
• To show up vessels faithfully?
– Better contrast
– Artifact removal
67 of 185
What Affect FRE ?
• TR selection
• Velocity and slice thickness
• Flip angle
• Velocity distribution in vessel
• Factors determining MRA success
68 of 185
Better MRA Contrast
• Adjust scanning parameters
– Slice thickness & orientation
– TR & flip angle
– Saturate unwanted vessels
69 of 185
Slice Orientation
• FRE only in thru-plane flow
• Slice perpendicular to vessel
• Curved vessels often look
narrow due to less FRE
70 of 185
Through-plane & In-plane Flow
Often bright Not too bright
image slice
vessel
71 of 185
Slice Orientation Effects
Narrow proximal anterior tibial artery branch ?
72 of 185
Slice Thickness
• FRE comes from blood flowing “out
of” the image slice
• FRE obvious for thin slices
• Spatial resolution also higher
• Note gradient & SNR restrictions
73 of 185
FRE vs. Velocity & Slice Thickness
Blood flow
slow
fast
74 of 185
Better MRA Contrast
• Adjust scanning parameters
– Slice thickness & orientation
– TR & flip angle
– Saturate unwanted vessels
75 of 185
TR Effects
• FRE comes from blood flowing “out of”
the image slice
• Short TR insufficient time to flow out
• Long TR static tissues less saturated
• Optimal TR = thickness / velocity
76 of 185
FRE vs. Velocity & Slice Thickness
Blood flow
slow
fast
optimal TR
77 of 185
Flip Angle Effects
• Large flip angle favors T1 contrast
• Bright blood leads to flow ghosts
• Large flip angle may partially
saturate slow flow
– Close to static tissue regime
78 of 185
Flip Angle Effects on Ghosts
Angle = 900 Angle = 600 Angle = 300
A P
A : anterior tibial artery
P : common peroneal trunk artery
79 of 185
Flip Angle Effects
• Quite complicated in reality
• Anatomical location dependent
– Different flow velocities
• 45 ~ 60 frequently used (2D TOF)
80 of 185
Flip Angle Effects on MRA
Angle = 100 Angle = 300 Angle = 500
Also note small vessel contrast
81 of 185
Note: TR & Flip Angle
• More important in slow flow
– Relative to slice thickness
• Often not critical in 2D TOF MRA
• Essential in 3D TOF MRA
82 of 185
Better MRA Contrast
• Adjust scanning parameters
– Slice thickness & orientation
– TR & flip angle
– Saturate unwanted vessels
83 of 185
Use of Saturation Band
• Suppress unwanted vessels to avoid
overlapping
• SAT band follows the slice
– Tracking SAT
• Order: from downstream to upstream
84 of 185
Inflow Saturation Principles
90
RF
Gz
Gy
Gx
t
t
t
t
gradient echo saturation
a
image slice
SAT band
85 of 185
Jugular Vein Suppressed with SAT
Angiogram Arteriogram
86 of 185
Use of Saturation Band
• Suppress unwanted vessels to avoid
overlapping
• SAT band follows the slice
• Tracking SAT
• Order: from downstream to upstream
87 of 185
Tracking SAT Principles
Excitation from downstream to upstream
image slice SAT band
SAT band
always follows
the image slice
88 of 185
Just Like Entry-Slice FRE Phenomena
Entry slice Inner slice
89 of 185
Better MRA Contrast
• Adjust scanning parameters
– Slice thickness & orientation
– TR & flip angle
– Saturate unwanted vessels
90 of 185
MRA Not Over Yet !
• To show up vessels faithfully?
– Better contrast
– Artifact removal
91 of 185
MRA Artifacts
• Intra-voxel phase dispersion
causes apparent narrowing of
blood vessels
• Interrupt from bright signal of fat
92 of 185
Intra-Voxel Dephasing
• Non-uniform or turbulent flow
• Dephasing occurs with gradient
• Dephasing in one voxel low
signal looks like no flow
93 of 185
No Bulk Blood Flow in Vessel !
Different FRE in one single vessel
laminar
flow
94 of 185
Turbulent Flow
Carotid Artery Basilar Artery
CCA
ECA
ICA
BA
S Cerebellar
S Cerebellar
Cerebral P Cerebral
95 of 185
Pseudo Stenosis from Dephasing
MRA XRA
96 of 185
Reason for Narrowing
• Gradient = local magnetic field
• Flow Bo changed phase
• Different flow = different phase
low signal from dephasing
• Pseudo-stenosis
97 of 185
Risk of False Positive
• Can’t be regarded as normal
– Stenosis often seen in patients
• Over-estimate of stenosis
– Dephasing due to turbulent flow
98 of 185
Over-Estimated Stenosis
Stenosis magnified due to dephasing signal loss
99 of 185
Slice Orientation Is One Reason Too
Narrow proximal anterior tibial artery branch ?
100 of 185
What about Aneurysm ?
• Possible slow flow
• Vortex may also be present
• Signal loss like static tissue ?
• Under-estimate of aneurysm
101 of 185
Under-Estimate of Aneurysm
One drawback of MRA (false negative)
signal loss due to vortex
looks like static tissue
102 of 185
Remedy : Flow Comp
• Flow Compensation (GE)
• GMR (Siemens), MAST (Picker)
• Pre-calculated gradient waveform to
yield phase independent of flow
103 of 185
Gradient Moment Rephasing
No GMR With GMR
t
t
t
t
RF
Gs
Gp
Gr
104 of 185
Intra-voxel Dephasing & Flow Comp
No flow comp With flow comp
105 of 185
Remedy : Short TE
• Dephasing takes time
• Short TE to reduce dephasing
– Or less signal loss
• Fractional Echo (remember?)
106 of 185
k-space Data Omission
Half Fourier Fractional echo
kx
ky
kx
ky
107 of 185
Fractional Echo Sequence
TE can be shortened
z gradient
RF (B1) t
t
y gradient t
x gradient t ...
TE
108 of 185
Short TE & GMR Effects
Stenosis downstream signal loss at long TE
TE = 1.5 2.5 3.8 5.3 6.2 7.0 8.0
109 of 185
Flow Comp Leads to Longer TE
No GMR With GMR
t
t
t
t
RF
Gs
Gp
Gr
110 of 185
MRA Artifacts
• Intra-voxel phase dispersion
causes apparent narrowing of
blood vessels
• Interrupt from bright signal of fat
111 of 185
Fat Artifacts
• TOF MRA is from T1 contrast
• Fat has a short T1
• Strong fat signal looks like blood
vessels ?
112 of 185
3D TOF MRA (Circle of Willis)
Note the periorbital fat
113 of 185
Remove Fat Artifacts
• CHESS fat SAT (remember?)
• Successful fat SAT requires …
– Shimming
– Avoid air/tissue interface …
114 of 185
CHESS Principles
water
fat
900 fat only
RF
Gz
Gy
Gx
t
t
t
t
spin-echo fat-SAT
ppm
ppm
115 of 185
Fat SAT Comparison (Original Image)
No Fat SAT Fat SAT
116 of 185
Fat SAT Comparison (MIP MRA)
No Fat SAT Fat SAT
117 of 185
Never Forget Though …
• Successful fat SAT requires
– Uniform Bo & B1 …
• Failed fat suppression leads to
confusing TOF MRA !
118 of 185
Fat SAT in MRA (Courtesy a Friend)
No Fat SAT Fat SAT
119 of 185
MRA Still Not Over Yet!
• To show up vessels faithfully?
– Better contrast
– Artifact removal
• What about 3D TOF MRA then?
120 of 185
3D Time-of-Flight
MR Angiography
Hsiao-Wen Chung (鍾孝文), Ph.D., Professor
Dept. Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Univ.
Dept. Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital
121 of 185
Time-of-Flight MR Angiogram
… using bright blood signals
?
122 of 185
Maximum Intensity Projection
Any orientation, computer calculation
123 of 185
Motivation of 3D MRA
• Multiple 2D images for projection
are already 3D in nature
• Why not just doing 3D then ?
124 of 185
MRA Needs 3D Volume Anyway
3D MRA has slice resolution advantages
2D MRA 3D MRA
125 of 185
2D & 3D MRA
• Same FRE principle on 3D scan
– More thinner slices
– Higher SNR
126 of 185
Review: 3D MRI Principle
• Not too different from 2D
• Another loop for slice encoding
• Thick slab selection
– Scan time much longer
127 of 185
3D Imaging Pulse Sequence
Gz & Gy form two inner/outer loops
z gradient
RF (B1) t
t
y gradient t
x gradient t
sample
...
128 of 185
3D MRI Properties
• Scan time concern -- short TR
– Small a, gradient-echo, T1WI
• SNR ~ slice number
– Trade high SNR for thin slice
129 of 185
Review : Good TOF MRA
• Gradient-echo (avoid flow void)
• Short TR (T1WI & FRE)
• Proper scanning parameters
• Consistent with 3D MRI !
130 of 185
Bright Blood & Black Blood MRI
Gradient echo Spin echo
131 of 185
3D MRA Motivation
• Multiple 2D images for projection are
already 3D in nature
• Same FRE principle on 3D scan
– More thinner slices
– Higher SNR
132 of 185
3D Limitations Though …
• Factors affecting FRE
– Slice thickness & TR
• Extremely complicated in 3D !
133 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
RF excitation
t RF
image slice
vessel blood
134 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
Signal receiving and T1 recovery
t RF
135 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
T1 recovery
t RF
136 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
Next RF excitation
t RF
137 of 185
Saturation Phenomena of Blood
“Yellow” part not excited previously !
t RF
experience 2 RF
experience 1 RF
138 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
RF excitation
t RF
image slab
vessel blood
139 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
Signal receiving, T1 recovery
t RF
140 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
T1 recovery
t RF
141 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
Next RF excitation
t RF
142 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
3D FRE obviously weaker (not too critical)
t RF
experience 2 RF
experience 1 RF
143 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
Inconsistent vessel contrast after slicing !
brighter vessel upstream darker vessel downstream
144 of 185
3D Slab Thickness
• Thick slab leads to complex FRE
• Upstream shows strong FRE,
downstream gradually saturated
• Darkened vessel looks narrowed
• Prominent in slow flow
145 of 185
Gradually Darkened 3D TOF MRA
Lowered signal at downstream
146 of 185
2D & 3D FRE (Carotid Bifurcation)
2D TOF : uniform 3D TOF : clear edge
147 of 185
TR Effects on Vessel Intensity
Short TR shows strong intensity gradient
t RF
experience 2 RF
experience 1 RF
148 of 185
Solution
• Less RF for the upstream
– Small flip angle excitation
• More T1 weighting at downstream
– Large flip angle excitation
149 of 185
Solution
• Flip angle varies locally
– Using one single RF pulse
– RF solved with simple math
– TONE (Siemens), RAMP (GE)
150 of 185
TONE & sinc RF Pulse Comparison
Control saturation for uniform vessel signal
300
200
400
flip angle
sinc RF pulse
TONE RF pulse
151 of 185
TONE (Ramp) Pulse Comparison
Sinc RF pulse TONE pulse
152 of 185
Combining Pros of All Flip Angles
Angle = 100 Angle = 300 Angle = 500
Also note small vessel contrast
153 of 185
3D TOF MRA Properties
• FRE weaker than 2D
– Background suppression
relatively important
• MT saturation & fat suppression
154 of 185
FRE in 3D MRI
3D FRE obviously weaker
t RF
experience 2 RF
experience 1 RF
155 of 185
Fat SAT Comparison (Original Image)
No Fat SAT Fat SAT
156 of 185
Fat SAT Comparison (MIP MRA)
No Fat SAT Fat SAT
157 of 185
Fat SAT in MRA (Courtesy a Friend)
No Fat SAT Fat SAT
158 of 185
MT Saturation
• Magnetization transfer saturation
• No time to explain, but basically...
• Suppresses tissues containing
large protein molecules
159 of 185
MTS for MRA
• Suppress background tissues to
enhance blood signals
– Relatively few proteins in blood
– Serum albumin relatively small
– MTS stronger in static tissues
160 of 185
MTS Comparison (Original Image)
No MTS with MTS
161 of 185
MTS Comparison (MIP MRA)
No MTS with MTS
162 of 185
TONE & MTS Comparison
None MTS MTS + TONE
Note conspicuity of small vessels
163 of 185
3D TOF MRA Properties
• Less prone to darkened intensity
due to curved vessels
• Obviously an advantage
164 of 185
Slice Orientation (2D)
• FRE only in thru-plane flow
• Weak signal at curved vessels
– Narrowing, pseudo-stenosis
165 of 185
Slice Orientation Effects
Narrow proximal anterior tibial artery branch ?
166 of 185
FRE & Slice Orientation
• Perpendicular at entrance suffices
– Unsaturated blood flows into
imaging region (slice or slab)
– Unimportant afterwards
• 3D slab thick, easy to handle
167 of 185
2D MRA Slice Orientations
Not all slices can be made perpendicular
168 of 185
3D MRA Slab Orientation
FRE from carotid artery, Circle of Willis unaffected
169 of 185
2D versus 3D
• 2D : think slice stronger FRE
good for slow flow (venogram)
• Insensitive to in-plane flow
• Application : carotid arteries
170 of 185
Note : “Slow” ??
• About venous flow
• No FRE if too slow
– Example : CSF
• Flow ~ w.r.t. TR & slice thickness
171 of 185
2D TOF MRA
Carotid arteries at three viewing angles
172 of 185
2D versus 3D
• 3D : thick slab, weaker FRE
• SNR & resolution both better
• Curved vessels are fine
• Application : circle of Willis
173 of 185
3D MRA (MIP) of the Circle of Willis
Axial view Sagittal oblique view
174 of 185
Common 3D TOF MRA Today
175 of 185
Combining Advantages
• Slow curved flow (e.g., AVM)
• Multiple thinner 3D slabs
• Multiple Overlapped Thin-Slab
Acquisition (MOTSA)
176 of 185
Arteriovenous Malformation
Two 3D slabs to see slow flow
177 of 185
MOTSA of AVM
Visualize both arterial/venous sides of AVM
178 of 185
MOTSA
• Commercialized for aneurysm
and vascular malformation
• Inter-slab boundaries still visible
• Not too perfect yet
179 of 185
Multi-Slab Pitfalls (but fine)
Artifacts at overlapped slabs unavoidable
180 of 185
MRA Not Over Yet ...
• Artifacts: flow + gradient ~ phase
– Intravoxel phase dispersion
• Phase for velocity ?
• Next week : phase-contrast MRA
181 of 185
Flow Quantification at SVC
SVC flow profile in one cardiac cycle
SVC flow
cardiac phase
182 of 185
MRA Not Over Yet ...
• Artifacts : Fat interrupts MRA
– Short T1 strong signals
• Can we shorten blood T1 ?
• Advanced topic: CE MRA
183 of 185
Intracranial CE MRA (Aneurysm)
TOF MRA CE MRA
184 of 185
Body Contrast-Enhanced MRA
GI MRA Breast MRA
185 of 185
Flow Artifacts & Magnetic
Resonance Angiography
Hsiao-Wen Chung (鍾孝文), Ph.D., Professor
Dept. Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Univ.
Dept. Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital
186 of 185
FRE 在血管上游和下游的差異
TR = 20 TR = 40 TR = 80