Hadronic cascades in GRBs and AGNs Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Tech.) Collaboration with S.Inoue, P.Meszaros M.Kino

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

GRB Short GRB Precursor Delay z=0.903 E iso =10 53 erg 8keV-260keV 260keV-5MeV >100MeV >1GeV 31GeV, 3.4GeV

Citation preview

Hadronic cascades in GRBs and AGNs Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Tech.) Collaboration with S.Inoue, P.Meszaros M.Kino GRB Standard Picture Internal Shock External Shock ISM GRB Short GRB Precursor Delay z=0.903 E iso =10 53 erg 8keV-260keV 260keV-5MeV >100MeV >1GeV 31GeV, 3.4GeV GRB ; Spectra Band+ Extra PL GRB B E iso =4x10 54 z=1.822 Abdo et al. ApJ 706, L138 Extra Component in B Extra Component=Afterglow? GRB Monte-Carlo Method R R=R/ 2 Photons: Luminosity L Power-law injection of protons Energy density of photons U Energy density of magnetic field U B =f B U Energy density of Accelerated protons U p =f p U Method t . dt Emission (Synch. IC) p Yes or No? Yes -> + or 0 Proton Neutron Proton + - 0 Cross Sections n + processes also Inelasticity Iterative Method To estimate p, Inv.Comp., processes, we need a photon field. During the dynamical timescale, the photon field is assumed to be steady. Photon Field By hand Calculation Photon Field Result Calculation Photon Field Result Cascade Processes n+ + + e + + e p+ 0 0 + p + e - + e + e - + e + Synchrotron + Inv.Comp.: p, , ,e Synchrotron Self-absorption: e e Iterative Method -> Both photon field and cascade processes are solved consistently. Highest Energy The Larmor radius R L =e E p /B < shell width =R/. The acceleration time R L /c < cooling time. The energy of particles is limited by two conditons. Cooling Processes: Proton Synchrotron+IC Photoproduction of pions Bethe-Heitler Proton acceleration efficiency We need ergs/Mpc 3 /yr to explain UHECRs See e.g. Murase, Ioka, Nagataki, Nakamura 2008 We may need Up/U>20. If GRB rate is 0.05 Gpc -3 /yr, Up/U>100 Proton Dominated? Energy Gamma keV Proton E -2.0 PeV-EeV E 2 n(E) To make gamma-rays from protons contribute enough, the proton energy largely exceeds the gamma-ray energy?? Efficent for pion production Distortion due to proton cascade Lepton distribution E Primary Electrons Pairs from Cascade f B =1.0 e-SY Up=U Double break f B =1.0 e-SY Double break 2 Much More Protons Primary Electron Components Energy-dependence B-dependence GRB ; Spectra Band+ Extra PL Cascade due to photopion production 3.4GeV R=10 14 cm =1500 Synchrotron and Inverse Compton due to secondary electron-positron pairs Band component -absorption Asano, Guiriec & Meszaros 2009 The maximum energy is determined by the dynamical timescale. A long cooling timescale -> low efficiency of pion- production The cooling timescales (comoving frame) of protons due to synchrotron, inverse Compton, Bethe-Heitler, and photopion production are plotted. The dynamical timescale is R/ c. Proton Synchrotron R=10 14 cm Even in this case, secondary pairs contribute Proton synchrotron case Synchrotron is the most efficient in this case. We suppress E max to avoid too much secondary photons. t acc =R L /c Neutrinos from GRB We may need >10 -2 erg/cm 2 to detect with IceCube. Bright Neutrino GRB B Hadronic Model s =-0.07, =-3.9 Photosperic? Naked Eye GRB GRB080319B Hadronic In preparation E iso erg GRBs GeV Photon detection -> >1000 Extra Component -> Afterglow? Hadronic? High -> Lower Photon Density, Magnetic Field ->Lower Effciency for Photopion Production Hadronic Models require >10 55 erg/s for GRB Ref. E iso erg in gamma-rays for GRB080916C Gamma-rays from hypernovae Soderberg et al. 2006 Particle Acceleration in Winds Relativistic component 1, E k erg Proton Cooling in Hypernova A*=5 Secondary Photons Muon-Decay Origin Absorbed Proton SY Origin Hypernovae Secondary emission from hyeprnovae X-ray due to cascade from muon decay GeV emission from proton synchrotron Delayed TeV emission HN Rate 500 Gpc -3 yr -1 Compact Radio-Loud AGN CSOs (Compact symmetric objects ) Radio lobe nuclei 3C 84 ~10 pc Size < 500 pc 120 kpc FRII radio galaxies Evolution?? e.g., Carvalho et al. 1985; Fanti et al. 1995; Begelman 1996; Readhead et al. 1996, Velocity of Hot Spot: 0.1 c for 20 CSOs CORALZ(COmpact RA-dio sources at Low-Redshift): erg/s HFPs(high frequency peakers): erg/s Gamma-Rays from Compact Radio AGNs Core of Seyfart 2 gal. NGC 1275 (M BH =3*10 8 M sun ) z= Other radio bubbles (Pedler+91, Vermeulen+96) Asada+06 5 pc VSOP view of 3C84 Chandra view of Perseus Cluster (Fabian) 3C84 (NGC1275) Fermi (>200MeV) SSC Model EGRET Fermi UMRAO Abdo+09 COS-B Long Term Evolution Nagai+09, submitted Born! app = 0.23 Lobe Generation VERA Nagai+09, submitted freq. dependent? (need further studies) Lobe Velocity Nagai+09, submitted Smoking-gun of core-outburst Wide-view (~kpc) Core (~pc) Radio Light Curve Hadronic Model for Compact Radio AGNs 2pc 10pc UV: L=3x10 45 erg/s, T=10eV Disk Proton Injection L=5x10 46 erg/s Adiabatic Expansion v exp =0.1c B=0.1G Spectrum UV D=100Mpc Hadronic Contributions SED of mini radio-lobe (t_age=t_inj) Kino & Asano in prep VLBI obs. Stars/Dusts overlapped ICM/ Hot-disk overlapped With/Without protons is distinguishable at domain! SNR(?) Case Electron Injection has been already stopped? Pure Hadronic Case