12
3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 1/12 www.medscape.com Abstract and Introduction Abstract Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is present in approximately 15% of early invasive breast cancers, and is an important predictive and prognostic marker. The substantial benefits achieved with antiHER2 targeted therapies in patients with HER2positive breast cancer have emphasised the need for accurate assessment of HER2 status. Current data indicate that HER2 test accuracy improved following previous publication of guidelines and the implementation of an external quality assessment scheme with a decline in falsepositive and falsenegative rates. This paper provides an update of the guidelines for HER2 testing in the UK. The aim is to further improve the analytical validity and clinical utility of HER2 testing by providing guidelines of test performance parameters, and recommendations on the postanalytical interpretation of test results. HER2 status should be determined in all newly diagnosed and recurrent breast cancers. Testing involves immunohistochemistry with >10% complete strong membrane staining defining a positive status. In situ hybridisation, either fluorescent or bright field chromogenic, is used either upfront or in immunohistochemistry borderline cases to detect the presence of HER2 gene amplification. Situations where repeat HER2 testing is advised are outlined and the impact of genetic heterogeneity is discussed. Strict quality control and external quality assurance of validated assays are essential. Testing laboratories should perform ongoing competency assessment and proficiency tests and ensure the reliability and accuracy of the assay. Pathologists, oncologists and surgeons involved in test interpretation and clinical use should adhere to published guidelines and maintain accurate performance and consistent interpretation of test results. Introduction Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein, mainly due to HER2 gene amplification, in breast cancer is associated with aggressive histological features and poor prognosis. [1,2] Several randomised clinical trials have demonstrated substantial survival benefits in patients with HER2positive breast cancer treated with antiHER2 targeted therapy, such as trastuzumab [3–5] and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib [6–8] but not in HER2negative patients. [9] This, in addition to potential side effects of these costly drugs and evidence of higher response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2positive tumours, [10] has emphasised the need for accurate assessment of HER2 status in patients with allinvasive breast cancer. Early studies, with relatively small numbers of cases, suggested that as many as 30% of breast cancers had HER2 overexpression, with a false positive rate up to 19% and a false negative rate of 5–10%. [11–13] However, following publication of guideline recommendations [11,14–18] and refinement of test performance parameters including the standardisation of tissue handling, assay methodology and adopting quality assurance measures, recent data indicate that the frequency of HER2 positivity is between 13% and 20%. [11,12,19–21] The false positive rate is reduced to less than 6%, the false negative rate is much lower (<2%) and, importantly, the proportion of inconclusive cases is significantly reduced. [11,12,19,20] To ensure the highest degree of test accuracy, reproducibility and precision, there is a need to further standardise and improve the quality of technical aspects such as assay performance, validation, proficiency testing and accreditation. These guidelines, which are presented on behalf of the UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology, aim to update the previous UK guidelines [14–16] and provide recommendations on the preanalytical and postanalytical assay performance parameters and give advice on methodology and quality assurance measures for HER2 testing. Preanalytical Measures Specimens HER2 status should be assessed in all invasive primary breast carcinomas and in recurrent and metastatic tumours whenever biopsy tissue is available. Bilateral carcinomas, histologically distinct ipsilateral carcinomas or widely separated carcinomas considered to be separate synchronous primary tumours should each be assessed. It is deemed reasonable not to assess Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer Emad A Rakha, Sarah E Pinder, John M S Bartlett, Merdol Ibrahim, Jane Starczynski, Pauline J Carder, Elena Provenzano, Andrew Hanby, Sally Hales, Andrew H S Lee, Ian O Ellis J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(2):9399.

her 2 assessment

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

new recommendations for breast cancer

Citation preview

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 1/12

    www.medscape.com

    AbstractandIntroductionAbstract

    Humanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2(HER2)overexpressionispresentinapproximately15%ofearlyinvasivebreastcancers,andisanimportantpredictiveandprognosticmarker.ThesubstantialbenefitsachievedwithantiHER2targetedtherapiesinpatientswithHER2positivebreastcancerhaveemphasisedtheneedforaccurateassessmentofHER2status.CurrentdataindicatethatHER2testaccuracyimprovedfollowingpreviouspublicationofguidelinesandtheimplementationofanexternalqualityassessmentschemewithadeclineinfalsepositiveandfalsenegativerates.ThispaperprovidesanupdateoftheguidelinesforHER2testingintheUK.TheaimistofurtherimprovetheanalyticalvalidityandclinicalutilityofHER2testingbyprovidingguidelinesoftestperformanceparameters,andrecommendationsonthepostanalyticalinterpretationoftestresults.HER2statusshouldbedeterminedinallnewlydiagnosedandrecurrentbreastcancers.Testinginvolvesimmunohistochemistrywith>10%completestrongmembranestainingdefiningapositivestatus.Insituhybridisation,eitherfluorescentorbrightfieldchromogenic,isusedeitherupfrontorinimmunohistochemistryborderlinecasestodetectthepresenceofHER2geneamplification.SituationswhererepeatHER2testingisadvisedareoutlinedandtheimpactofgeneticheterogeneityisdiscussed.Strictqualitycontrolandexternalqualityassuranceofvalidatedassaysareessential.Testinglaboratoriesshouldperformongoingcompetencyassessmentandproficiencytestsandensurethereliabilityandaccuracyoftheassay.Pathologists,oncologistsandsurgeonsinvolvedintestinterpretationandclinicaluseshouldadheretopublishedguidelinesandmaintainaccurateperformanceandconsistentinterpretationoftestresults.

    Introduction

    Overexpressionofthehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2(HER2)protein,mainlyduetoHER2geneamplification,inbreastcancerisassociatedwithaggressivehistologicalfeaturesandpoorprognosis.[1,2]SeveralrandomisedclinicaltrialshavedemonstratedsubstantialsurvivalbenefitsinpatientswithHER2positivebreastcancertreatedwithantiHER2targetedtherapy,suchastrastuzumab[35]andthetyrosinekinaseinhibitorlapatinib[68]butnotinHER2negativepatients.[9]This,inadditiontopotentialsideeffectsofthesecostlydrugsandevidenceofhigherresponseratestoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinHER2positivetumours,[10]hasemphasisedtheneedforaccurateassessmentofHER2statusinpatientswithallinvasivebreastcancer.Earlystudies,withrelativelysmallnumbersofcases,suggestedthatasmanyas30%ofbreastcancershadHER2overexpression,withafalsepositiverateupto19%andafalsenegativerateof510%.[1113]However,followingpublicationofguidelinerecommendations[11,1418]andrefinementoftestperformanceparametersincludingthestandardisationoftissuehandling,assaymethodologyandadoptingqualityassurancemeasures,recentdataindicatethatthefrequencyofHER2positivityisbetween13%and20%.[11,12,1921]Thefalsepositiverateisreducedtolessthan6%,thefalsenegativerateismuchlower(

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 2/12

    multipleipsilateraltumoursiftheyarehistologicallysimilarandcolocatedinthesamequadrant/regionofthebreast.Thereisnoconsensusontestingresidualinvasivetumourfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy,althoughsomerecommendthisapproach.RetestingnonrespondingstableorprogressiveHER2negativetumoursparticularlyhighgradetumoursorthosewithalongtimeperiodbetweenpreoperativebiopsyandexcisionmaybeconsideredbutcannotberecommendedroutinelyinviewofthelackofevidence.

    Excellentconcordancebetweencorebiopsyandsurgicalspecimenshasbeenshownusingimmunohistochemistry(IHC)andinsituhybridisation(ISH).[20,22,23]InthemajorityofUKcentres,HER2testingisperformedonthediagnosticneedlecorebiopsyspecimens,mainlytoensuretimelyavailabilityofresultsatthetimeofpostoperativemultidisciplinaryteam(MDT)treatmentplanningdiscussionandalsotoenableconsiderationforneoadjuvanttreatmentusewhichisincreasinglyusedforoperablecases.AlthoughassessmentofHER2statusonneedlecorebiopsyisrecommendedandnorepeatonexcisionspecimensisneededifthetestisclearlypositiveornegative,performing/repeatingtheassayonincisionalorexcisionalsurgicalspecimensshouldbeconsideredif:

    (1)thecorebiopsyisnotavailable(ie,thereisonlyacytologysample)or(2)thereisapossibilitythattheHER2testonthecorebiopsyisunreliableorunrepresentativeofthetumouridentifiedintheresectionspecimenasfollows:

    1. HER2assessmentisuninterpretableonthecoreduetotechnicalartefacts(ie,suboptimalprocessingorstaining)orthereisdoubtaboutthecorebiopsyhandling.

    2. ThecorebiopsyHER2statusremainsintheequivocalcategoryafterIHCandISHforexample,repeatassessmentisadvisedifthecorebiopsywasscoredas2+onHER2IHCwithborderlinenegativeISH(ratioofnumberofHER2tochromosome17centromerecopiesof1.81.99orHER2genecopynumberis46).

    3. Invasivetumouronthecoreistoosmallforreliableassessment,orifinvasivediseaseisintimatelyadmixedwithinsitucarcinoma,oronlyidentifiedintheexcisionspecimen.Thereisinsufficientdatatodefinetheamountofinvasivetumourtissueincorebiopsysufficientforanalysishoweverthiscanbelefttothereportingpathologist'sdiscretion.

    4. Ifthetumourintheresectionspecimensismorphologicallydistinctfromthatinthecorebiopsy,forexampleofaclearlydifferenthistologicaltypeorhistologicalgrade(eg,lowgradeonthecoreandhighgradeontheexcision,butnotjustreflectingminordifferenceinthemitoticcountorproportionofsolidareas).[24]Arepeatmayalsobeundertakenonconcurrentmetastaticnodaldiseaseifitismorphologicallydistinctfromtheprimarybreasttumour.

    5. IfthecorebiopsystainingisheterogeneousandshowsafocusofstrongHER2positivityin

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 3/12

    morethan72hCentresusingrapidfixationandprocessingmustvalidatetheirmethodologyforHER2assessment.

    Sectionsshouldbestainedwithin12daysofcuttinganddrying.Excessivesectiondryingtimehasalsobeenshowntocausea

    lossofHER2expressionanditisthereforerecommendedthatfreshlycutsectionsareeitherdriedat60Cfor1hor37C

    overnight[29]

    (http://www.ukneqasicc.ucl.ac.uk/neqasicc.shtml).

    AlgorithmsforHER2Testing

    IHCfordetectionofproteinoverexpressionandISHfordetectionofgeneamplificationstatusarethetechniquesrecommended

    fordeterminingHER2status.HighconcordancebetweenIHCandgeneamplificationstatusisreported.[16,30,31]

    ThecurrentUK

    recommendationsforHER2testingareforatwotiersystemusingIHCwithreflexISHtestingifrequired,usingthemodelshown

    infigure1,oraonetierISHstrategy.IngeneraltestingisperformedusingIHCwithanalysisofequivocalcasesbyISH,butthis

    doesnotprecludelaboratoriesfromusingprimaryHER2ISHtesting,particularlyifthequalityoftissuefixationisquestionable.[32]

    ISHhasusuallybeenconductedusingafluorescenceISH(FISH)technique.BrightfieldISH,whichcanbeusedtoassessHER2

    statuswitharegularlightmicroscope,isnowacceptedasanalternativetoFISH.[33]

    ThemostcommonbrightfieldISHusesa

    DNAprobecoupledtoachromogenicISHorsilverISHdetectionsystem,oracombinationofboth.[33]

    ISHcanbeconducted

    usingasingleprobetoenumerateHER2copiespernucleusorasadualprobetechniquewhichallowsdeterminationofthe

    HER2:CEP17ratioandHER2genecopynumber.Forthisreasontheinclusionofachromosome17probeisstronglyadvocated.

    Currently,otheravailableHER2testingtechniques(PCR,ELISA,Southernblotting,mRNAassaysandDNAmicroarray)should

    beusedforresearchonly.Similarly,HER2resultsobtainedfromanonISHtechniqueaspartofaprognosticpanelcannotbe

    regardedasdiagnosticandshouldnotreplacestandardassaymethodsdetailedabove.

    Figure1.

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 4/12

    RecommendedHER2scoringalgorithmforimmunohistochemistry(IHC)andinsituhybridisation(ISH).*Insufficientdataisavailabletocommentonmoderatecompletemembranestainingin10%oftumourcellsorstrongincompletemembranestainingin>10%oftumourcells.Arepeatonanotherspecimen/tissueblockisadvisable.**Membranestainingmustbeintenseanduniformandresemblechickenwire.Ignoreincompleteorpalemembranestaininginthepercentageestimation.

    ScoringImmunohistochemistry

    OnlymembranestainingoftheinvasivetumourshouldbeconsideredwhenscoringHER2.Cytoplasmicstainingandstainingofinsitudiseaseshouldnotbescored,andnormalepitheliumshouldbenegative.TheHER2IHCscoringmethodisasemiquantitativesystembasedontheintensityofreactionproductandpercentageofmembranepositivecells,givingascorerangeof03+(figure1).Samplesscoring3+areregardedasunequivocallypositive,andthosescoring0/1+asnegative.Borderlinescores(2+)areregardedasequivocalandmandatefurtherassessmentusingISH(figure1).Appropriatecontrolsfeaturingdifferentscores(3+,2+and1+/0)shouldbeincludedineverytestrun.Somecentresalsoincludeanonslidepositivecontrolsection.TheHER2testshouldbereportedasindeterminate,andrepeatedwherepossible,iftechnicalissuespreventoneorbothtests(IHCandISH)frombeingreportedaspositive,negativeorequivocal.Examplesinclude,inadequatespecimenhandling,artefacts(eg,crushormarkededgeartefacts)thatmakeinterpretationdifficult,analyticaltestingfailureorifcontrolsarenotasexpected(ie,sampleshowsstrongmembranestainingofnormalbreasttissue).Insuchacase,analternativetest,oranotherspecimenifavailable,shouldbeusedtodetermineHER2status.TheseguidelinesreverttothepreviouslyusedIHCcriterionof>10%cellsstainingforHER2[14,15]insteadofthe>30%cutoffusedinthepreviousguidelines.[11,16]

    ScoringISH

    HER2ISHtesting,whichusesadualprobemethod,isinitiallyexpressedastheratioofHER2signaltochromosome17centromericenumerationprobe(CEP)signal.SubsequentlytheaverageHER2genecopynumberreportinghasbeenusedinsomecountrieswhenusingdualprobeandsingleHER2geneprobemethodology.TheUKrecommendationistousedualprobeISHandreporttheHER2/CEP17signalratioandHER2copynumber.Tumoursshowingaratio2.0and/orameanHER2genecopynumber6areconsideredtobepositive.AssigningcasesaspositivebasedonaHER2genecopynumber6wheretheHER2/CEP17ratiois

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 5/12

    tomanageheterogeneousHER2geneamplificationinbreastcancerandisrecommendedintheseguidelines:[37]

    InallcaseswhereISHisperformedtheentireslideshouldbescannedbeforecounting,areasofapparentheterogeneityshould

    beidentifiedduringthisscanand/orbyreferencetoanIHCstainedslide.Thenumberofchromosome17(CEP17)andHER2

    signalsshouldbecountedin2060nonoverlappinginvasivecancercellnuclei,usingatleastthreedistincttumourfields.Ifthere

    isevidenceofheterogeneitybetweenfields(orlessfrequentlywithinfields)additionalcells(atleast20perfield)and/orfields(up

    to6)shouldbecounted.TheHER2/CEP17ratioshouldbecalculatedforeachfieldindividually.WherethemeanHER2/CEP17

    ratioinanyfieldis2.00orgreater,thetumourshouldberegardedasamplified.Forallcaseswheretheratioisbetween1.80and

    2.20resultsshouldbebasedoncountingatleast60tumourcells,andincaseswhereheterogeneityissuspectedthisshouldbe

    60cellsperassessedfield.Inrarecaseswhereamplifiedandnonamplifiedtumourcellsareintermingledinasinglefield,

    interpretationisdifficultandevidenceislacking.Wesuggestthatforsuchcasesonlythepresenceofclearlyamplifiedcells,with

    multipleHER2signals,isconsideredevidenceofheterogeneity,againevidenceislackinginthisarea.Currentevidencedoesnot

    supportusingtheexistenceofsmallnumbersofapparentlyamplifiedcellswithinanindividualtumourfieldtoidentify

    heterogeneousamplification.[36,38]

    Inborderlinecases,thatis,thosewithaHER2/CEP17ratioof1.802.20,additionalcellsshouldbecountedwhenpossible

    (optimallyaminimumof60percase),ideallythisshouldincludeadualcount(fromasecondobservereitherinternallyorina

    secondcentre).Theoptimalapproachtoimprovingaccuracyinthisrangeistoincreasethenumberofcellscountedto60120,

    and/orrepeatthetest.Aratioof1.801.99,aftercountingfurthercellsand/orrepeatingthetest,shouldbereportedasborderline

    butnotamplifiedandincludeaclearstatementthatthecarcinomaisregardedasHER2negative(takingthemeanHER2copy

    numberintoconsideration(mean10%oftheinvasivetumourareausingIHCisusedtodefinepositivity,casesshowingcompleteintense

    membranestainingin

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 6/12

    differentiateinvasivefrominsitudiseaseintheindextumourblocksubmittedforISH,IHCmarkersformyoepithelialcellscanbeused.

    ImageanalysissystemsmayprovidealternativestomanualscoringforHER2IHCandISH.However,atpresent,insufficient

    evidenceisavailabletorecommendtheirroutineuseinthediagnosticsetting.

    QualityAssuranceMeasures

    Controls

    Theinclusionofcontrols,ideallyincludingonslidecontrol(s),andtheirdetailedscrutinyareessentialtoensuretest

    accuracy.ControlswhoseHER2statushasbeenvalidatedandproducingresultsclosetoimportantdecisionmaking

    pointsarerecommended.Tissuebasedcontrols,frombreastcancers,shouldalsobeusedinallassayruns,ideally

    showing3+,2+and1+/0patterns.Controlmaterialshouldbesimilarlyfixedandprocessedtothetesttissue.Control

    sectionsshouldideallybecutatthesametimeasthetestmaterial.Longtermstorageofprecutcontrolsectionsisstrongly

    discouraged.Thereisnoevidencethatstorageofblocksleadstodeteriorationofsignal.

    CelllinepreparationscontainingmultiplesamplesofknownHER2statuscharacterisedbyFISHandIHCandinclusionofa

    tumourtissuefromIHC3+caseoneachslideareusefulasadditionalcontrols.

    Excessiveantigenretrievalshouldbemonitoredbyevaluatingnormalbreastepithelialcellsasaninternalcontrol.Should

    membranestainingbeidentifiedinthenormalcellpopulation,excessiveantigenretrievalmayhaveoccurredandretestingofthe

    entirerunshouldbeconsidered.Anysuchtestsshouldcertainlybeinterpretedwithgreatcareitisreasonabletoscorea0or1+

    tumourasnegative,but2+or3+tumoursshouldhavestainingrepeated.Ifthereisdoubtbetweena1+/2+resultora2+/3+

    result,eithertheIHCshouldberepeatedoramplificationstatusshouldbeassessedusingISH.Ifmembranestainingofnormal

    epithelialcellsisseeninanumberofcasesfromthesamestainingrunconsiderationshouldbemadetorepeatstainingofthe

    wholerun.

    Crushingandedgeartefact,particularlyaffectcorebiopsies.ISH,orrepeatIHConthesurgicalspecimen,maybeneeded.

    Thepotentialgradienteffectsofsuboptimalfixation,particularlyinlargersurgicalspecimens,mustalsobeconsideredin

    interpretationofstaining.

    Itisessentialthatassayproceduresbestandardisedsothatstainingisreliable.Astherecanbevariationbetweenbatches

    ofreagents,itisvitalthatcontrolsareassessedcriticallyforeveryrun.Newbatchesofantibodyshouldalsobetested

    beforecommencingroutineapplication.Useofstandardisedoperatingprocedures,includingroutineuseofcontrol

    materials,isrecommended.

    AppropriateLaboratoryAssayMethods

    ForIHCandISHbasedHER2testing,comprehensivestandardisationofmethodology,includingmonitoringofscoringprocedures

    andtheinclusionofvalidatedcontrols,ismandatory.IntheUK,participationandsatisfactoryperformanceintheUKNational

    ExternalQualityAssessmentSchemeforImmunocytochemistryandInSituHybridisation(UKNEQASICC&ISH)HER2IHCandISHmodulesisarequirement(http://www.ukneqasicc.ucl.ac.uk).

    StandardisationofHER2IHCstainingisbestachievedbyusingacommercialkit/assay.Inhouse'homebrew'(laboratory

    validated)methodsarenotrecommendedbut,ifused,strictprotocolsneedtobefollowed,includingchoiceofantibody,antibody

    dilutionandretrievalmethod,eachofwhichcancausevariabilityinstainingresults.Ifacommercialkit/assayisused,itis

    recommendedthatlaboratoriesadherestrictlytothekit/assayprotocolandscoringmethodology.Localmodificationsof

    techniquescanleadtofalsepositiveandnegativeresults.Therefore,itisimportanttocheckandauditcontrolscarefullyinorder

    toensuretestaccuracy.LaboratoriesusingbrightfieldISHshouldperformaninitialvalidationagainstFISH.

    InterobservervariationintheassessmentofIHCstainingcanleadtomisclassificationofHER2status.Eachindividualassessor

    shouldstandardisescoringagainstknownpositive,negativeandborderlinecases.Itisalsopreferabletoassesscomparabilityof

    scoringwithacolleagueonaregularbasis.BeforeundertakingevaluationofHER2,assessorsshouldreceiverelevanttraining.

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 7/12

    PublisheddatasuggestthatinterobservervariationissignificantlylowerforFISHthanforIHC.However,especiallywhen

    developinganewservice,careneedstobetaken.Therecommendationisthatlaboratoriesshouldperformvalidationstudiesby

    dualobserverscoringwhentrainingnewstaffuntilthereisconcordanceof95%.ForISHvalidationpurposes,eachstaffmember

    shouldperformaminimumof100ISHtestsinparallelwithanexperiencedISHscorertoattainaminimumconcordanceof95%

    ondiagnosticresults(amplifiedandnonamplifiedstatus)andnumericalresults(forHER2andCEP17).Continuedmonitoringof

    scoringoffersadvantagesinqualitycontrolandtraining,butisnotarequirement.

    ValidationofStandardisedAssayMethodology

    Testconditionsshouldbeoptimisedsothatdistinctmoderateorstrongmembranestainingshows>90%concordancewithHER2

    ISHpositivesamples.Thiscanbeachievedby:

    1. DualHER2IHCandISHassayofacontemporaryseriesofbreastcarcinomas(minimum100cases).Useoftumourtissue

    arrayblocksforthispurposemayreducecosts.HER2ISHassaycanbeconfinedtothosecasesdemonstrating3+,2+

    and1+membranereactivity.

    2. Alternatively,aseriesofcarcinomasthathavealreadybeenscoredforHER2IHCandISH,fromareferencelaboratory,

    canbeused.

    Laboratoriesnotabletostandardiseinhousemethodologyshouldalsoconsiderusingacommercialvalidatedkitassaysystem.

    ISHforHER2GeneEvaluation

    ISHtestingforHER2shouldmeetthefollowingcriteria:

    1. Comprehensivestandardisationofmethodology

    2. Validatedcontrols:theinclusionofachromosome17probetoallowforcorrectionoftheHER2signalnumberfor

    chromosome17aneusomy(seenin~30%ofcasesandreportedlymorecommonintumoursthatshowdiscrepantHER2

    expressionandintumourswithdiscordantHER2proteinandgenecopynumbermeasurements)isrecommended.

    CaseLoad

    Laboratoriesprovidingatestingserviceshouldbecarryingoutaminimumof250assaysperyearfor

    immunohistochemicaldetectionofHER2.Thistargetlevelhasbeensettoensurehigherconsistencyofassayqualityand

    continuingexpertiseofassayproviders.

    Centreswithlownumbersofcases(

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 8/12

    Itisrecommendedthatcommerciallyavailablevalidatedprobesareused.ThereareanumberofcommercialkitsforHER2ISHusingfluorescenceandchromogenbaseddetectionsystemsandwhichareallacceptable,onceproperlyvalidated.

    ShortturnaroundtimesforHER2testingthatdonotdelaythemanagementofpatientsarerecommended.Turnaroundtimeisrecognisedtobevariablebetweendifferentcentres,andcanbeaddressedatthelevelofcancernetworksandlocalservices(figure2).TheNationalInstituteforCareExcellencerecommendsthatHER2statusofthetumourbeassessedandtheresultsmadeavailablewithin2weekstoallowplanningofsystemictreatmentbytheMDTandthatlocalarrangementsandwrittenclinicalprotocolsareinplacetoensureHER2statusresultsareavailablewithinthistime(http://publications.nice.org.uk/breastcancerqualitystandardqs12/qualitystatement5pathologyerandher2status#qualitymeasure5).Itisalsoimportanttoemphasisetheroleofimprovedcommunicationbetweenpathologists/laboratoriesperformingthetestandclinicianstoensureproperhandlingofspecimens(ie,prefixationtimeandfixationtype),shortturnaroundtimeandproperinterpretationofthetestresults.

    Figure2.

    PathwayforHER2testing.

    Audit

    Regularandongoingauditshouldbeundertaken.LaboratoriesshouldaudittheiroverallpositiverateforHER2usingacombinationofIHCandISH.Itisimportanttoensurethatthesamplesizeisadequate.Ofnote,theaverageproportionofinvasivebreastcancercasesrecordedasHER2positiveis14.5%(UKNEQASICC&ISHcombined5yearnationalauditdata),with14.3%ofprimarycarcinomasand18%ofmetastaticcasesbeingHER2positive().Ofthesecasesapproximately22%casesare

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 9/12

    reportedasborderline(2+)onIHCofwhich1516%arereportedasHER2ISHamplified.[16]TheproportionofHER2positivebreastcancersfoundinscreendetectedbreastcancercasesisrecognisedtobelowerthaninsymptomaticpractice.AuditofHER2assayturnaroundtimeisalsoimportantasitiscriticaltopatientpathway.

    Table1.ProportionofHER2positiveprimaryandmetastaticbreastcancers*

    0 1+ 2+ 3+ ISH+ OverallHER2positive

    Overall(%) 32.8 33.1 21.8 11.6 14.7 14.5

    Primarycarcinoma(%) 32.6 33.7 21.8 11.5 14.6 14.3

    Metastaticlesion(%) 36.7 27.2 21.1 14.9 15.8 18.0*

    *UKNEQASICC&ISHcombined5yearnationalauditdata(unpublisheddata).

    ISH,insituhybridisationISH+,proportionof2+carcinomasthatareamplifiedUKNEQASICC&ISH,UKNationalExternalQualityAssessmentSchemeforImmunocytochemistryandInSituHybridisation.

    QualityAssuranceforHER2ReceptorEvaluationintheUK

    AllUKclinicallaboratoriesusingIHCorISHtoassessHER2statusasapredictivemarkermustparticipateinanappropriateexternalqualityassuranceprogramme,suchasthatrunbytheUKNEQASICC&ISH.

    Communication

    IntheeraofpersonalisedmedicineandthecommonplaceroutinepracticeofMDTmeetingfordiscussionofdiagnosisandmanagementofallpatientswithcancerintheUK,improvedcommunicationwithintheteamisconsideredofparamountimportance.AlthoughformanyyearstherehasbeencollaborationbetweenpathologistsandpatientfacingcliniciansintheUK,thisguidelinefurtheremphasisestheimportanceofthiscollaboration.Closecommunicationwithsurgeonsandradiologistsisthereforeadvisedinordertoimprovecontroloversamplesprefixationtimeandfixationtype,andwithoncologiststoimproveunderstandingofinterpretationoftheresults.ThisisalsoexpectedtofacilitatecontroloverHER2testturnaroundtime.

    Inconclusion,thisupdatecontainsrecommendationssupportedbyasufficientlevelofevidenceonkeypointsrelatedtoHER2testingmethodology,testingalgorithm,interpretationoftheresultsandthepotentialneedforretesting.LaboratoriesofferingaHER2testingserviceandpathologists,oncologistsandsurgeonsinvolvedintestinterpretationandclinicaluseshoulddotheirbesttoadheretopublishedguidelinesandensureaccurateperformanceandinterpretationofsuchtests.

    References

    1. SlamonDJ,GodolphinW,JonesLA,etal.StudiesoftheHER2/neuprotooncogeneinhumanbreastandovariancancer.Science1989244:70712.

    2. RossJS,FletcherJA.HER2/neu(cerbB2)geneandproteininbreastcancer.AmJClinPathol1999112(1Suppl1):S5367.

    3. GianniL,DafniU,GelberRD,etal.Treatmentwithtrastuzumabfor1yearafteradjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithHER2positiveearlybreastcancer:a4yearfollowupofarandomisedcontrolledtrial.LancetOncol201112:23644.

    4. PiccartGebhartMJ,ProcterM,LeylandJonesB,etal.TrastuzumabafteradjuvantchemotherapyinHER2positivebreastcancer.NEnglJMed2005353:165972.

    5. GianniL,EiermannW,SemiglazovV,etal.Neoadjuvantchemotherapywithtrastuzumabfollowedbyadjuvanttrastuzumabversusneoadjuvantchemotherapyalone,inpatientswithHER2positivelocallyadvancedbreastcancer(theNOAHtrial):arandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialwithaparallelHER2negativecohort.Lancet2010375:37784.

    6. GeyerCE,ForsterJ,LindquistD,etal.LapatinibpluscapecitabineforHER2positiveadvancedbreastcancer.NEnglJ

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 10/12

    Med2006355:273343.

    7. BaselgaJ,BradburyI,EidtmannH,etal.LapatinibwithtrastuzumabforHER2positiveearlybreastcancer(NeoALTTO):arandomised,openlabel,multicentre,phase3trial.Lancet2012379:63340.

    8. DiLeoA,GomezHL,AzizZ,etal.PhaseIII,doubleblind,randomizedstudycomparinglapatinibpluspaclitaxelwithplacebopluspaclitaxelasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer.JClinOncol200826:554452.

    9. SeidmanAD,BerryD,CirrincioneC,etal.RandomizedphaseIIItrialofweeklycomparedwithevery3weekspaclitaxelformetastaticbreastcancer,withtrastuzumabforallHER2overexpressorsandrandomassignmenttotrastuzumabornotinHER2nonoverexpressors:finalresultsofCancerandLeukemiaGroupBprotocol9840.JClinOncol200826:16429.

    10. UntchM,RezaiM,LoiblS,etal.NeoadjuvanttreatmentwithtrastuzumabinHER2positivebreastcancer:resultsfromtheGeparQuattrostudy.JClinOncol201028:202431.

    11. WolffAC,HammondME,SchwartzJN,etal.AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology/CollegeofAmericanPathologistsguidelinerecommendationsforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2testinginbreastcancer.JClinOncol200725:11845.

    12. PerezEA,SumanVJ,DavidsonNE,etal.HER2testingbylocal,central,andreferencelaboratoriesinspecimensfromtheNorthCentralCancerTreatmentGroupN9831intergroupadjuvanttrial.JClinOncol200624:30328.

    13. TaucherS,RudasM,MaderRM,etal.Prognosticmarkersinbreastcancer:thereliabilityofHER2/neustatusincoreneedlebiopsyof325patientswithprimarybreastcancer.WienKlinWochenschr2004116:2631.

    14. EllisIO,BartlettJ,DowsettM,etal.BestPracticeNo176:updatedrecommendationsforHER2testingintheUK.JClinPathol200457:2337.

    15. Pathologyreportingofbreastdisease.AJointDocumentIncorporatingtheThirdEditionoftheNHSBreastScreeningProgramme'sGuidelinesforPathologyReportinginBreastCancerScreeningandtheSecondEditionofTheRoyalCollegeofPathologists'MinimumDatasetforBreastCancerHistopathology.January2005.NHSBSPPub.No58p.

    16. WalkerRA,BartlettJM,DowsettM,etal.HER2testingintheUK:furtherupdatetorecommendations.JClinPathol200861:81824.

    17. HammondME,HayesDF,DowsettM,etal.AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology/CollegeOfAmericanPathologistsguidelinerecommendationsforimmunohistochemicaltestingofestrogenandprogesteronereceptorsinbreastcancer.JClinOncol201028:278495.

    18. CarlsonRW,MoenchSJ,HammondME,etal.HER2testinginbreastcancer:NCCNTaskForcereportandrecommendations.JNatlComprCancNetw20064(Suppl3):S122quizS34.

    19. MiddletonLP,PriceKM,PuigP,etal.ImplementationofAmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology/CollegeofAmericanPathologistsHER2GuidelineRecommendationsinatertiarycarefacilityincreasesHER2immunohistochemistryandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationconcordanceanddecreasesthenumberofinconclusivecases.ArchPatholLabMed2009133:77580.

    20. ChenX,YuanY,GuZ,etal.Accuracyofestrogenreceptor,progesteronereceptor,andHER2statusbetweencoreneedleandopenexcisionbiopsyinbreastcancer:ametaanalysis.BreastCancerResTreat2012134:95767.

    21. WolffAC,HammondME,HicksDG,etal.Recommendationsforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2testinginbreastcancer:AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology/CollegeofAmericanPathologistsclinicalpracticeguidelineupdate.JClinOncol201331:39974013.

    22. ArnedosM,NerurkarA,OsinP,etal.Discordancebetweencoreneedlebiopsy(CNB)andexcisionalbiopsy(EB)forestrogenreceptor(ER),progesteronereceptor(PgR)andHER2statusinearlybreastcancer(EBC).AnnOncol

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 11/12

    Correctionnotice

    200920:194852.

    23. LeeAH,KeyHP,BellJA,etal.ConcordanceofHER2statusassessedonneedlecorebiopsyandsurgicalspecimensofinvasivecarcinomaofthebreast.Histopathology201260:8804.

    24. GreerLT,RosmanM,MylanderWC,etal.Doesbreasttumorheterogeneitynecessitatefurtherimmunohistochemicalstainingonsurgicalspecimens?JAmCollSurg2013216:23951.

    25. DurgapalP,MathurSR,KalamuddinM,etal.Assessmentofher2/neustatususingimmunocytochemistryandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationonfineneedleaspirationcytologysmears:Experiencefromatertiarycarecentreinindia.DiagnCytopathol201442:72631.

    26. ZustinJ,BoddinK,TsourlakisMC,etal.HER2/neuanalysisinbreastcancerbonemetastases.JClinPathol200962:5426.

    27. PenaultLlorcaF,CoudryRA,HannaWM,etal.Experts'opinion:RecommendationsforretestingbreastcancermetastasesforHER2andhormonereceptorstatus.Breast201322:2002.

    28. LeeAH,KeyHP,BellJA,etal.TheeffectofdelayinfixationonHER2expressionininvasivecarcinomaofthebreastassessedwithimmunohistochemistryandinsituhybridisation.JClinPathol201467:5735.

    29. LundgaardHansenB,WintherH,MollerK.ExcessivesectiondryingofbreastcancertissuepriortodeparaffinisationandantigenretrievalcausesalossinHER2immunoreactivity.Immunocytochemistry20086:Run76.11722.

    30. PressMF,SauterG,BernsteinL,etal.DiagnosticevaluationofHER2asamoleculartarget:anassessmentofaccuracyandreproducibilityoflaboratorytestinginlarge,prospective,randomizedclinicaltrials.ClinCancerRes200511:6598607.

    31. PaulettiG,DandekarS,RongH,etal.AssessmentofmethodsfortissuebaseddetectionoftheHER2/neualterationinhumanbreastcancer:adirectcomparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry.JClinOncol200018:365164.

    32. SauterG,LeeJ,BartlettJM,etal.Guidelinesforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2testing:biologicandmethodologicconsiderations.JClinOncol200927:132333.

    33. ArnouldL,RogerP,MacgroganG,etal.AccuracyofHER2statusdeterminationonbreastcoreneedlebiopsies(immunohistochemistry,FISH,CISHandSISHvsFISH).ModPathol201225:67582.

    34. RisioM,CasorzoL,RedanaS,etal.HER2geneamplifiedbreastcancerswithmonosomyofchromosome17arepoorlyresponsivetotrastuzumabbasedtreatment.OncolRep200513:3059.

    35. PerezEA,ReinholzMM,HillmanDW,etal.HER2andchromosome17effectonpatientoutcomeintheN9831adjuvanttrastuzumabtrial.JClinOncol201028:430715.

    36. HannaWM,RuschoffJ,BilousM,etal.HER2insituhybridizationinbreastcancer:clinicalimplicationsofpolysomy17andgeneticheterogeneity.ModPathol201427:418.

    37. BartlettAI,StarcyznskiJ,RobsonT,etal.HeterogeneousHER2geneamplification:impactonpatientoutcomeandaclinicallyrelevantdefinition.AmJClinPathol2011136:26674.

    38. OhlschlegelC,ZahelK,KradolferD,etal.HER2geneticheterogeneityinbreastcarcinoma.JClinPathol201164:111216.

  • 3/22/2015 www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/839097_print 12/12

    AsentenceunderScoringISHsectionhasbeencorrectedsincepublishedOnlineFirst.

    Provenanceandpeerreview

    Notcommissionedexternallypeerreviewed.

    JClinPathol.201568(2):9399.2015BMJPublishingGroupLtd&AssociationofClinicalPathologists