Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
High resolution x-ray analysis of the nano-structures
徐嘉鴻
國家同步輻射研究中心
Introduction of Synchrotron RadiationIntroduction of X-ray scatteringApplication of SR x-ray scattering -
Strain field and Compositional distribution of InGaAs quantum dots – iso-strain scattering and Resonant X-ray Scattering Structure determination of nano-thick HfO2 epi-layersStructure and composition determination of Y2O3 doped HfO2 thin films Epitaxial stablization of h-Gd2O3 on GaN (0001) and Thickness dependent structure transformation
清大物理 5/5/2011
The synchrotron produces light by accelerating electrons almost to the speed of light. Magnets put the electrons into circular paths. As the electrons turn, photons (little packets) of light are given off. The infrared, UV, and X-rays are sent down pipes called beamlines, to work areas where scientists run their experiments. The components of a synchrotron include an electron gun 電子槍, linear accelerator 線性加速器, a circular booster ring 增能環 (to increase the speed of the electrons), storage ring 儲存環(to re-circulate electrons), beamlines 光束線, and end stations 實驗站.
How does synchrotron radiation source work?
Electron Beam
N
S
N
S
SynchrotronRadiation Angular distribution of the radiation emitted by an
electron moving along a circular obit (dashed line) at a speed (a) much smaller than and (b) close to the speed of light.
a) b)
e-gunLINAC
transport line
bending maget
RF cavity
insertion device
BM beamline
ID beamline
Principal Components of a SR Light Source
Booster and Storage ring two-in-one
動畫astrid_total_v2.mov
103 101 10-1 10-3 10-5 10-7 10-9 10-11 10-13 10-15
10-9 10-7 10-5 10-3 10-1 101 103 105 107 109
無線電波
可見光
紅外線 紫外線 硬X射線 加瑪射線軟X射線微波
同步輻射源
(eV)
可探測到的物體
建築物
波長(米)
輻 射 源
粒子加速器
棒 球 昆 蟲 細 胞 病 毒 蛋白質 分 子 原子核質子 夸克?原 子
放射性源X射線管電 燈無線電天線 速度調制電子管
光子能量(電子伏特)
The Properties of Synchrotron Radiation• High Intensity & brightness
ISR > 106 * Itube
• Wide range of continuous Spectrum (NSRRC 35 keV > E > 0.05 eV)
x-ray far IR• Excellent Collimation • Low Emittance• Pulsed-time Structure (NSRRC)
bunch length: 25 pspulse separation: 2 nsno. of buckets: 200
• Polarizationlinear polarization, elliptical polarization
• Coherence (laser)
101 102 103 104 105
107
108
109
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
IASW6 (TLS)
SW6 (TLS)
W20 (TLS)
Bending (TLS)B
rillia
nce
(Pho
t/s/0
.1%
bw/m
m2 /m
r2 /0.4
A)
Photon Energy (eV)
Bending (TPS)
CU1.8 (TPS)
SW4.8 (TPS)
104 increase
Natural emittance: 1.6 nm-radStraight sections: 7 m (x 18); 12 m (x 6)
Taiwan Photon Source (TPS)3 GeV, 518.4 m, 500 mA
Taiwan Light Source (TLS)1.5 GeV, 120 m, 360 mA
Full capacity: 48 ports
Administration and Operation Center
Academic Activity Center
101 102 103 104 1051013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
U280
Bending
CU18
IU20EPU46
EPU70EPU100
SW48
Bril
lianc
e (p
hoto
ns/s
/0.1
%bw
/mr2 /m
m2 /0
.4A)
Photon Energy (eV)
Cu Kα 8.0 keV 70 keV
101 102 103 104 1051013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
70 keV
IASW60
U50EPU56
U90
SW60
W200
SWLS
Bending
Bril
lianc
e (p
hoto
ns/s
/0.1
%bw
/mm
2 /mr2 /0
.4A)
Photon Energy (eV)
Cu Kα 8.0 keV
Brightness comparison of TLS and TPSThe X-ray spectrum (photon energy 8 keV~70 keV):the brilliance of bending magnet increases by >102.the brilliance of bending IDs increases by 4~6 orders of mag.
TPSTLS
~102
>103
Wave
a snap shot of wave
Amplitude AThree key components of a wave: Wavelength λ (period in space)
Period τ (period in time)Phase φ = (kx-ωt+φ0)
plane wave:propagating along x )cos(
)(2cos
0
0
tkxA
txAA
ωτλ
π
−=
−= wave vector k = 2π/λangular frequency ω = 2π/τ
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
5 10 15 20 25 30
-1
0
1
x
X-ray: a from of electromagnetic wave with sinusoidally vibrating electric
and magnetic fields moving through space. (so is visible light) speed of light c = 299,792,458 m/sec ~ 3×108 m/sec (= in vacuum) Energy E = hc/λ = ħω
X-ray
3 key factors: wave vector (energy), amplitude, phase
plane wave: E(x,t) = E0 e-i(kx-ωt)
kω
crystal(periodic array of atoms)
= ⊗
lattice(periodicity)
basis(motif)
convolution
space group lattice point group(230) (14) (32)
Crystal: a repeated (periodic) array of atoms
A crystal structure consists of identical copies of the same physical unit, called the basis, located at all the points of a lattice. A lattice is defined as an array of equivalent points in 1, 2 or 3 dimensions. The environment of an atom placed on any one of these lattice points would be identical to that placed on any other lattice point. Therefore the lattice locates equivalent positions and shows the translational symmetry. The actual positions of atoms or molecules, however, is not provided.
= ⊗
(0 1)lattice
The crystal can be viewed as being made up of sets of parallel planes
(1/m 1/n): m and n are the intersections along a1 and a2
(0 2)a1
a2
A lattice can be described by sets of parallel planes.
Each set of parallel planes can be uniquely described by its• d-spacing : the distance between adjacent planes• orientation of plane normal
lattice
A lattice can be described by sets of parallel planes
a1
a2
(1 4)
intersection along a1: 1 intersection along a2: ¼
(1 4) plane
(1 2)
low index planes: more dense, more widely spacedhigh index planes: less dense, more closely spaced
lattice planes in real space
(1 0 0)
(1 0 0)
(2 1 0)
(2 1 0)
(3 2 0)
(3 2 0)
(3 1 0)
(3 1 0)
(110)
(110)
(0 1 0)
(0 1 0)
lattice points in reciprocal space
A crystal can be described by sets of evenly spaced parallel planes.Represent each set of planes by its and 2π/dhkl, a vector (point) in reciprocal space.
There is a one-to-one correspondence between R’s and G’s.n̂
Effect due to Lattice Constant Change(Strain Effect)
2π (a2-1- a1
-1) ≥ R-1
2 atoms
5 atoms
Diffraction Pattern of A Row of Atoms
Domain size Peak width
Scherrer equation L = 0.9λ/(Bcos θB)
(Elastic) X-ray Scattering
Ei = Ef i.e. λi = λf (elastic scattering)
wave vector k = 2π/λ ; | ki | = | kf |
2θ
qr
fkr
ikr
q = 4π sin(θ)/λif kkqrrr
−=
scattering vector
Bragg Law 2d sinθ = λ
Real space Reciprocal space
hkldπθ
λπ 2sin22 =
qkfki
Condition for Bragg reflection
θθ
θdhkl d sinθd sinθ
θ
ki kf
Path Difference L = 2dhkl sinθConstructive interference: L = nλphase difference φ = k L
hklhkl
Gnd
qqvv === ˆ2ˆsin4 πθ
λπ
FT
a1
a2
a1=a
a1’a2’
a1’=2π/a
Texture - Pole figures
Ag/NaCl(001)<220> pole figure
[001]Ag || [001]NaCl[100]Ag || [100]NaCl
With fixed |q|, measure the diffraction intensity while rotating the sample orientation over a hemisphere. Spatial distribution of orientations.
|q|= |G220| = 2π/d220
H
K
L
H
K
L
(202)(-202)
(022)(0-22)
(220)
(-220)
(2-20)
(-2-20)
Ag: fcc structure
Experimental method:With a given, 2θ, a series of φ scans is performed at regularly incremented χ values.
Texture - Pole figures
Pole figures show the stereographic projection of the locations where a selected crystallographic plane, defined by its interplanar distance d value, is in a reflection position.
To define the orientation of a crystal, we usually specify the directions of a crystallographic plane, such as the (001) plane of a cubic system.
H
K
L
r = R tan(χ/2)X = r cos φY = r sin φχ
φ
X
Y
(rcosφ rsinφ)
Texture - Pole figures (epitaxial)With fixed |q|, measure the diffraction intensity while rotating the sample orientation over a hemisphere. Spatial distribution of orientations.
[100]NaCl
[010]NaCl
|q|=2π/d220
Ag/NaCl(001) Ag{220} pole figure
[001]Ag || [001]NaCl[100]Ag || [100]NaCl
(2 0 2)
(-2 0 2)
(0 2 2)(0 -2 2)
(2 2 0)
(-2 -2 0)
(2 -2 0)
(-2 2 0)
a1’
a2’
a3’
Azimuthal Scans (Epitaxial Relationship)With fixed |q|, rotate sample against surface normal or crystalline
a1’
a2’
a3’
a3’
a1’ a2’
(101)
(111)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
I (sr
b. u
nit)
φ (deg)
film (101) substrate (111)
cubic-on-cubic growth
(001)
substrate
film
In-plane 45° rotation, i.e.<100>film || <110>sub
Texture – pole figure (preferred orientation)
Si cubic a =5.431ÅZnO Wurtzite (hexagonal)
(101)ZnO
Si]011[
Si]211[
ZnO/Si(111) (0001)ZnO || (111)Si
Columnar growth, no fixed in-plane orientation
a1’
a2’
a3’
120°
Texture - Pole figures
For a powder sample, you will see a uniform intensity distribution over the entire sphere. Each angular position corresponds to a crystalline.
H
K
L
Pole figure bears the information about crystalline orientation and symmetry
X
Y
Example 1: Strain field and compositional distribution of InGaAs quantum dots
3Dbulk semiconductor
2Dquantum well
1Dquantum wire
0Dquantum dot
Nano Materials Definition: 1 nm < size < 100 nm
Size, Strain, Shape, Composition Energy levels & physical properties
Ge QDCNT
VCSEL G. Medeiros-RebeiroHewlett-Packard Labs.
Sander Tans Delft University of Technology
QWBulk
self-assembled semiconductor quantum structures
Elastic Strain Relaxation during the S-K Growth(2-D followed by 3-D)
Uniformly Strained Layer
Dislocation Relaxed Islands
Coherently Strained Islands
increasing coverage
Issues of InterestApplication: uniform size, high density, regular arrangementFundamental: to understand and control the formation of quantum dots
coherent (dislocation free) dots/wires grown via the S-K mode
“Coherently Strained” Quantum Materials Fabricated by Heteroepitaxial Growth
narrow size distributionpreferred shapecorrelated spatial distributionsensitive to the details of growth condition
Nucleation phase (growth kinetics)Growth of islands (energetic balance)Ostwald ripening
strain relaxation, chemical intermixing, inter-dot interaction, surface energy
Uncapped In0.5Ga0.5As Quantum Dots
In0.5Ga0.5As 5ML/ Ga (4x2)
AFM image
n ~ 5.3x1010 cm-2
J. Cryst. Growth, 175/176, 777 (1997).
Grown by MEE
grown @ 520oC 0.1ML/s.
GaAs buffer layer 200 nm
GaAs (001)
aInAs = 6.0583ÅaGaAs = 5.65325Å
mismatch = 7.2 %
qa
qr
qz
ki
kf(HK0)
αι
αf
αf2θ
kf
zy
xqy
GIRSMGISAXS
qz
qx
Scattering geometry of Grazing Incidence X-ray Scattering
αi ~ αc
GIRSMq ~ (H K 0)
Strain sensitivestrain profilecomposition
GISAXSq ~ 0
Strain independentshape
spatial correlation
ki: incident wave vector.kf: scattered wave vector.q : scattering vector.αi: incident angle αf: outgoing angle
Pene
tratio
n de
pth
Λq c
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5q/qc or α/αc
Penetration depth vs. incident angle α or q
Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS)
q||
qz
direct beambeam stopper• inter-dot spacing ~ 48 nm• symmetric profile & azimuthal invariant• isotropic distribution & ω-symmetric shape
-0.05 0.00 0.05
1E-4
1E-3
I (ar
b. u
nit)
q|| (A-1
)
interference peak
qz=0.l08Å-1 kf
q
αι
ωki
n
tthαf
PRB 63, 35318 (2001) by I. Kegel et al.
2π (a2-1- a1
-1) ≥ R-1
Iso-strain slab: region of constant lateral lattice parameter al
For given G = (HK0), x-ray scattered by a slab
with al distributes around .222 KHa
ql
r +=π
large al ⇔ small qr
alqr
Reconstruct Quantum Dots Structure from Reciprocal Space Map (RSM)
Shape and Strain Distribution of In0.5Ga0.5As QDs
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0
5.0x10-6
1.0x10-5
1.5x10-5
2.0x10-5
I (ar
b. u
nit)
αf (deg)
αc=0.325o
0.99750.9950.9850.9750.96-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
1E-5
1E-4
1E-3
0.01
3.75
3.80
3.85
3.90
3.95
4.00
I (arb. unit)
K (r
lu)
H (rlu)
GaAs(040)al
qr
R=2.78/FWHM(follwoing the sin(x)/x law)
)cos(1 max
maxc
ak
zα
αα
=DWBA
Shape and Strain Distribution of In0.5Ga0.5As QDs
(▓) height Z and ( ) misfit vs. radius R measured along [040]
misfit = (aexp - aGaAs)/aGaAs, where aGaAs denotes the lattice parameter of bulk GaAs
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
Z (n
m)
R (nm)
misfit (%)
Structure factor is a simple linear combination of atomic scattering factors and atomic percentage of consisting elements
Composition of Iso-Strain Region
))(2
exp()1( LKHiffxfxF AsGaInHKL +++−+=π
2
200
400
))(1()())(1()()(
AsGarInr
AsGarInrr ffqxfqx
ffqxfqxqII
−−++−+
=
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.1
1
10
100
I
In concentration x
I400
I200
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
50100150200250300
I 400/I 20
0ab
c
InxGa1-xAs: FCC structure Ga, In: (0,0,0), As: (1/4,1/4,1/4)
Ratio of intensity around (400) and (200) ⇔ In concentration
disadvantages: multiple valuesadditional contribution from interference
1.86 1.88 1.90 1.92 1.94 1.96 1.98 2.00
1E-4
1E-3
I
K (rlu)
E=10.2 keV
-0.05 0.00 0.05
1E-4
1E-3
I (ar
b. u
nit)
q|| (A-1
)
GaAs(020)
Anomalous X-ray Scattering
Chemical composition and/or electronic states
Atomic scattering factor f (q,E)= f0(q) + f’(E)+ i f”(E)= f1+i f2
Intensity
E/Eedge
f1
f2
22
iHKL rqi
iiHKL efFI
vv ⋅⋅=≈ ∑
10.0 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10.0 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Nor
mal
ized
I (a
rb. u
nit)
E (keV)
x=0.0
x=0.2
x=0.25
x=0.35
x=0.5(200)
E (keV)
x=0.3
x=0.4
(400)
x=0.15
x=0.1
AsGaIn ffxfxF −−+= )1(200 AsGaIn ffxfxF +−+= )1(400
Simulated Spectra of the (200) and (400) Reflections of the InGaAs
weak reflection: H + K + L = 4n +2 strong reflection: H + K + L = 4n
peak
dip
narrower dipshift to larger E
Ga K-edge
Resonant X-ray Scattering around GaAs(020)
1.86 1.88 1.90 1.92 1.94 1.96 1.98 2.00
1E-4
1E-3
I
K (rlu)
E=10.2 keV
10.25 10.30 10.35 10.40 10.450.01
0.1
1
10
(0.24; 0.075)
(0.375; 0.065)
(0.48; 0.055)
(0.54; 0.04)
(0.31; 0.07)
E (keV)
(x = 0.13, Δx = 0.08)
1.97
1.96
1.951.94
1.975
K = 1.99 rlu
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Ga K-edge (10.367 keV)
∫ ′Δ′−−′= xxxxxEFxEQF d]/)(exp[),,(),,( 2222 Q
),(),(LP),,(),,( 2 EAExEFxEI QQQQ =
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
0
2
4
610 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Z (n
m)
R (nm)
In concentration (%)
( ) In concentration and ( ) radius R vs. height Z
Compositional Distribution
x increases monotonicallywith Z
x << 0.5 at the basex > 0.5 near the top
Ecoh = 2μ [(1+ν)/(1-ν)] ε||2
μ : shear modulusν : poisson’s ratioε|| : strain (in-plane)
Elastic Energy
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
1
2
3
4
5
6-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Z (n
m)
x (%)
Ecoh (meV)
(▲) elastic energy and ( ) In concentration x vs. height Z
Taking both strain and composition into account
J. Y. Tsao, Materials Fundamentals of Molecular Beam Epitaxy (1993)
Conclusions (InGaAs QDs)• X-ray Scattering is a powerful technique of characterizing the strain, shape, composition and spatial correlation of In0.5Ga0.5As QDs.
• Progressive lattice relaxation accompanied by severe variation in chemical composition as a function of height was observed. Beside the increase of lattice parameter, an enhancement in intermixing is a major mechanism to minimize the total energy.
• In concentration near the top of the dot is higher than the nominal composition. In surface segregation has additional contribution in reducing the system total energy and stabilizing the structure of self-assembled QDs.
• Grazing incidence resonant X-ray scattering is a powerful technique for composition characterization, especially for systems with strongly correlated surface morphology.