Upload
vuongkhue
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Hui Li, Ph.D., P.E.Yuan He, Ph.D.
John Harvey, Ph.D., P.E.
UC Pavement Research Center (UCPRC) University of California, Davis & Berkeley
January 13th, 20161
TRB 95th Annual Meeting. Jan 10th – 14th, 2016Lectern Session 756: Research Progress on Cool Pavement Strategies
Outline Urbanization & Environmental Impacts
Cool Pavement & Potential Strategies
Cool Pavement Pilot Study at UCPRC
Main Results & Conclusions
Policy Effort & Research Needs2
3Research Highlights 2010, http://www.walker‐institute.ac.uk
Heat Island Effectwas first identified in the early 1800s in London
Heat Island Effect:• Increase heat stress• Compromise human thermal comfort and health • Impair air quality (ground‐level ozone, i.e. smog)• Increase cooling energy consumption
• Total energy use• Peak demand for energy
Types of heat island effect Urban Near‐surface air Surface (hot spot)
4
Impervious Surface:• Create stormwater runoff• Pollute the waterbody• Reduce groundwater recharge• Increase risk of flooding• Contribute to heat island effect
Flooding & Water Pollutionfrom impervious surface
5Chicago, IL
40% + Pavement,Dark(hot) &
Impervious(flood)
Low Impact Development Restore Natural Process & Ecological Function
To make pavement Cool & Permeable.
Outline Urbanization & Environmental Impacts
Cool Pavement & Potential Strategies
Cool Pavement Pilot Study at UCPRC
Main Results & Conclusions
Policy Effort & Research Needs6
Potential Cool Pavement StrategiesStrategy Mechanism Co-Benefits
1. Modify material thermal properties1.1 Increase albedo/emissivity (?) Increase reflected/emitted
radiationEnhance illuminationOffset radiative forcing (?)
1.2 Increase heat capacity/density Increase heat capacity --
1.3 Reduce thermal conductivity Reduce transfer readiness --
2. Evaporation/evapotranspiration2.1 Permeable pavements
(+ vegetation)Increase latent heatIncrease thermal insulationIncrease convection
Reduce stormwater runoff Reduce water pollutionReduce flooding risk Recharge groundwaterIncrease greening
2.2 Water-retentive pavements (+ sprinkling)
Increase latent heat Reuse wastewater
3. Shading3.1 Canopy cover (+ trees) Reduce absorbed heat Increase greening (+ tree)
3.2 PV panels Reduce absorbed heat Reduce land use for solar farms
4. Enhance convection4.1 Ventilation paths Increase convection --
7
Outline Urbanization & Environmental Impacts
Cool Pavement & Potential Strategies
Cool Pavement Pilot Study at UCPRC
Main Results & Conclusions
Policy Effort & Research Needs8
Goal & Scope of Pilot Study Explore thermal behavior of several potential cool pavement strategies (particularly permeable pavement) Asphalt, concrete vs. paver (different albedos) Permeable vs. impermeable Dry vs. wet (irrigation)
Evaluate effectiveness and applicability when applied in different contexts Surface and near‐surface heat effect Human thermal comfort Building thermal load
9Experiment + Modeling
Field Measurements
• Permeability
• Albedo (i.e. solar reflectivity) & effect on pavement thermal performance
• Thermal behavior of permeable pavements under dry and wet conditions
• Thermal impact of pavement on near‐surface air
• Thermal interaction between pavement and wall
13
Outline Urbanization & Environmental Impacts
Cool Pavement & Potential Strategies
Cool Pavement Pilot Study at UCPRC
Main Results & Conclusions
Policy Effort & Research Needs14
Permeability
15
A2 A3 B2 B3 C2 C3
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Section
Hyd
raul
ic C
ondu
ctiv
ity (c
m/s
)
Permeameter (ASTM)
Permeability (a.k.a. hydraulic conductivity or infiltration rate)
A: Block Paver B: Asphalt C: Concrete
Albedo (Solar Reflectivity)
16
A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Section
Albe
do
A-Interlocking Concrete Pavement; B-Asphalt Pavement; C-Concrete Pavement.
1-Impermeable Design; 2 & 3-Permeable Designs.
Albedometer
A: Block Paver B: Asphalt C: Concrete
Albedo Change over Time
17
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
00:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 00:00Time
Alb
edo
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Rad
iatio
nW
m2
AlbedoIncident Solar RadiationReflected Solar Radiation
Change of albedo over time (nine test sections, only weathered)
Diurnal variation of albedo (B2)
albedo
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
9/4/11 11/3/11 1/2/12 3/2/12 5/1/12
Alb
edo
Time (m/d/yy)
A1A2A3B1B2B3C1C2C3
A: Block Paver (dash line)
B: Asphalt
C: Concrete
C: Concrete (C2)
18
y = -61.29x + 68.96R² = 0.91
y = -27.06x + 26.47R² = 0.78
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
Albedo
Tmax_SummerTmin_SummerTmax_WinterTmin_Winter
Asphalt Concrete & Block Paver
Surface Temperature vs. Albedo
Thermal Behavior of Permeable Pavement under Dry & Wet Conditions (e.g. B3).
19(mm/dd)
B1
Air
B3
B3: permeableB1: impermeable
Irrigation
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Wind speed (m/s)
Coe
ffici
ent C
C = -5.13 + ( -0.57 *WS) R 2̂ = 0.29
Thermal Impact on Near‐surface Air
20
Influence of wind speed
10 20 30 40 50 60 70T (C)
B1_Air @ 07/31/2012
0:002:004:006:008:0010:0012:0014:0016:0018:0020:0022:0024:00
0
25
51
76
102
Hei
ght (
cm)
0
10
20
30
40
Hei
ght (
in)
Thermal Impact on Wall
21Lighter is hotter: legend range of 30 to 65 °C
Asphalt (B1), 60 °C
Concrete (C1), 45 °C
Wall, 52 °C
Wall, 55 °C
13:00 8/15/2012
Human Thermal Comfort Index
22
Mean Radiant Temperature (MRT) Defined as the uniform temperature of an imaginary environment in which radiant heat transfer from/to the human body is equal to the radiant heat transfer in the actual non‐uniform environment.
Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) Defined as the equivalent air temperature at which, in a typical indoor setting (Tmrt=Ta; VP=12 hPa; v=0.1 m/s,), the heat balance of the human body is maintained with core and skin temperatures equal to those under the actual complex conditions being assessed.
0.25
1
1 ( ) 273n
i hbmrt i hb i hb hb
i hb hb
D SVF IT E VF F
Modeling & Simulation for Temperature
23
The model considers :• Energy balance on the pavement surface;• Coupled processes of radiation,
conduction, convection, shading and evaporation.
Finite Element Method implemented in ABAQUS.
24M is the metabolic rate (W/m2). W is the rate of mechanical work (W/m2). S (W/m2) is the total storage heat flow in the body.
Human Thermal Comfort Index, PET
28
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Tem
pera
ture
(°C)
Scenario
Ts Tmrt PET Sacramento, CA
Ts: Surface TemperatureTmrt: Mean Radiant TemperaturePET: Physiological Equivalent Temperature
Human Thermal Comfort Index, PET
29
Ts: Surface TemperatureTmrt: Mean Radiant TemperaturePET: Physiological Equivalent Temperature
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
Scenario
Ts Tmrt PET Phoenix, AZ
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Tem
pera
ture
(°C)
Scenario
Ts Tmrt PET Los Angeles, CA
Outline Urbanization & Environmental Impacts
Cool Pavement & Potential Strategies
Cool Pavement Pilot Study at UCPRC
Main Results & Conclusions
Policy Effort & Research Needs
30
Main Conclusions from Pilot Study Reflective Pavement
Albedo has significant effects on the pavement temperature. Greatly increasing albedo might cause negative impacts on human thermal comfort and building/vehicle energy use.
Permeable Pavement Permeable pavement is a cool pavement strategy with many environmental benefits.
Evaporation from permeable pavement plays an important role in reducing daytime UHI.
High thermal resistance of porous materials helps reduce UHI, especially during nighttime.
Permeable pavements with a designed albedo are a promising cool pavement strategy for mitigating UHI.
31
Outline Urbanization & Environmental Impacts
Cool Pavement & Potential Strategies
Cool Pavement Pilot Study at UCPRC
Main Results & Conclusions
Policy Effort & Research Needs32
Potential Benefits of Cool & Permeable Pavement
Mitigate heat island Create a livable & walkable communities during hot summer (mitigated
local heat stress) Reduce energy use for building and vehicle cooling Improve air quality (ground‐level ozone)
Reduce stormwater runoff Improve water quality Recharge groundwater Reduce flooding risk Reduce need for drainage/retention systems
Reduce pavement distress Rutting Cracking
33
Cool Pavements Research and Implementation Act
34http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi‐bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_296&sess=CUR
Research Needs on Cool Pavement Challenges & uncertainties in the technologies
Albedo & durability of reflective cement/binder & coating/treatment Durability of porous materials Permeability vs. wicking/evaporation of porous materials Tradeoff between different seasons & different goals
Comprehensive impact evaluation (what‐if analysis) Human comfort; energy use (building & vehicle) Air quality; groundwater quality Climate (e.g. rainfall) Life cycle cost analysis Environmental life cycle assessment (on‐going)
Evaluating impacts at different scales (multi‐scale modeling) Local/street level Small/block scale Large/city/regional scale
35