Upload
ilija-karafiloski
View
60
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PURPOSE
BuildingResilienceinMilitaryChildrenandtheirFamilies Ilija Karafiloski
Geraldine V. Oades-Sese, Ph.D.
Project C.O.M.B.A.T. (Children Overcoming Military Based Adversities Together) mission is to create materials that will be able to help teachers, nurses, psychologists, and social workers better support the needs of military families and their children. These include active duty, reserves, National Guard, and veterans.
Ø I would like to thank my preceptor Dr. Geraldine V. Oades-Sese for allowing me to work with her on this amazing project.
Ø I would also like to thank my internship coordinator, Kamila Pavezzi for her guidance and support.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
METHODOLOGY
SIGNIFICANCE
OUTCOMES
Background photo by Flickr user: https://www.flickr.com/photos/112081086@N07/
Ø Approximately 43.2% of active duty members are 25 years old or younger, and nearly half have children.
Ø There are about 1.2 million American school-aged military children with either one or both parents active in the forces.
Ø Over 80% of military children attend civilian public schools.
Ø Military children are different than civilian children because on average they will move 6-9 times through their K-12 grade education.
Ø Frequent and unpredictable moves can interrupt children’s lives and spouse’s career.
Ø Children who have a deployed military parent are at-risk for developing internalizing problems such as depression, anxiety, aggressive behaviors, academic and social problems.
Ø Overall ratings of 131 participants regarding Project COMBAT materials were excellent.
Ø Project COMBAT training workshops were rated excellent.
Ø Participants rated their overall knowledge gained from the workshop as excellent.
Ø Currently, we are evaluating the impact of the educational training workshops on participants’ pre- and post knowledge, professional practices, outreach to military families, and military child and family outcomes.
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Org
aniz
atio
n of
Pre
sent
atio
n
Val
ue/U
sefu
lnes
s of
Con
tent
Cla
rity
of
Pre
sent
er(s
)
Eff
ectiv
enes
s of
Pre
sent
er(s
)
Eff
ectiv
enes
s of
Vis
uals
Use
fuln
ess
Dev
elop
men
tal A
ppro
pria
tene
ss
Inte
rest
ing/
Eng
agin
g
Eas
e of
Rea
ding
Ove
rall
Rat
ing
of T
rain
ing
Ove
rall
Rat
ing
of M
ater
ials
Ove
rall
Rat
ing
of K
now
ledg
e G
aine
d
1 -
5 1
= P
oor
2 =
Fai
r 3
= A
vera
ge 4
= G
ood
5 =
Exc
elle
nt
Questions 1 - 12
Training Evaluation Mean Results
Participants: Ø Participants consisted of 166 school
professionals (29.5% school counselors, 39.2% social workers/family advocates, 19.3% teachers,4.2% site supervisors, 4.2% administrators, 2.4% psychologists, .6% nurses and .6% department chairman) from Newark-based schools.
Measures: Ø Post-Training Evaluation Form.
Statistical Analysis: Ø Descriptive Statistics.