IMC Midterm Case Study

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 IMC Midterm Case Study

    1/3

    Integrated Marketing Communication

    Midterm ExamFeb. 2016

    General Instructions

    Used Font Times New Roman Size 12

    Spaces between lines 1.15

    Delivery Date Friday the 26th of October 2016 during the

    lecture

    Answer Requirements A minimum 0f 200 words is required as an

    answer for each question

    A list of references used must to be attached to

    the answer

    Kindly read the case study below and answer all the related questions

    (30 Marks)

    Chic Soap Case Study

    You are asked to help formulate the IMC approach for the entrepreneur starting ChicSoap. The concept behind Chic Soap is simple; it sets out to incorporate fashionableperfumes such as Obsession, Raffinee and Opium into a high quality white soap base.The product would then be packaged using the logo of the perfume plus a Chic Soapcommon background. The advantages for the perfume supplier are: a guaranteed outletfor its perfumes at full retail prices; and a low cost trial route for potential customers. Theadvantages for Chic Soap are: the use of already established perfume concepts topromote the soap; and access to the distribution achieved by the perfumes. You are askedto identify the segment towards which the product is directed, the product benefit that is on

    offer, the way in which the segment will be serviced; how the distribution channel will besupported, what promotional planning will need to be included and an outline cash flow.

    1. The distribution channels available for the sale of toilet soaps of various qualities areindependent chemists, department stores, multiple chemists, supermarkets, and grocers.There were an estimated 200,000 outlets selling soap in the United Kingdom. Most ofthese sold mass market products which retailed at 0.25 per 150 gm bar. Premium soapsmade up only a small proportion of the market and were available in a limited number ofoutlets which included independent chemists and department stores.

    2. The main competitive products in the premium sector were soaps such as Roger and

    Gallet, Penhaligon range, Yardley, Morley and three internationally available premiumsoaps. The prices for the 150gm bar for the 5 main ranges were: 1.60, 1.75, 1.85,1.95, 1.45. There was some evidence that the price elasticity of the premium product

  • 7/24/2019 IMC Midterm Case Study

    2/3

    sector was fairly low. Consumers bought the product primarily on perfume and imagerather than any other product attribute. Very high prices were charged for soaps that werepart of ranges such as Rive Gauche; around 3.00 for the 150 gram equivalent. As the

    companies sold very little soap in these ranges they were not particularly worried about theeffects of other products cannibalising brand sales. They were prepared to see Chic Soapstake on the sales of perfumed soap to a wider market.

    3. The size of the total toilet soap market was around 190 million at retail. The top qualitypremium soap market was estimated to be 7 per cent of the total; it was growing slowly asthe deodorant market came under pressure because of the environmental problemsassociated with aerosol sprays; other growth factors included the expansion in showers,and the expansion in the number of single homes.

    4. Retail outlets made about 20 per cent gross on premium soaps. They tended to hold

    only limited stocks, and did not therefore want the product in as large a quantity as massmarket products which were available in cartons containing 50 or 100 bars.

    5. Many of the independent chemists were serviced through wholesalers. Suchwholesalers accounted for about 70 per cent of the market. Wholesalers expected to makearound 8 per cent. There were about 100 wholesalers that serviced the independentchemist; of these around 20 national chains accounted for 80 per cent of the totalbusiness. The national department stores (around 350) bought product direct.

    6. Research suggested that the main consumer of premium soaps was female 35+, socio-economic group A, concentrated in the South East of England and in large citieselsewhere. The average purchase of the 150 gramme soap was once every 3 weeks. Anincreasing proportion of the soap was bought as gifts, especially at Christmas. In theprevious year, around 25 per cent of the total premium soap sector was purchased duringthe period early November to late December.

    7. Most advertising in the sector was in women's magazines. It was estimated that it wouldcost around 100 to reach every 2000 consumers in the appropriate socio-economicgroup. The competition advertised heavily; average expenditure for the leading companieswas around 400,000 per annum.

    8. A sales representative would cost around 12,000 per annum; a company car would be3,000 per annum. Such a sales representative could visit either 500 outlets direct or dealwith 15 chains of wholesalers.

    9. The costs of packaging would be high. High quality packaging with the appropriateperfume design on the label would cost 0.14 per unit; with a minimum print run of 40,000units. It was anticipated that gift packs of the five perfumed soaps for the Christmasseason would be an additional 0.45 to produce with a minimum production run of 25,000units.

    10. The company had access to five of the leading perfumes in the country. These

    accounted for approximately 20 per cent of total fragrance sales - the market has beenand will remain highly fragmented. The costs of incorporating the perfume in the soap was0.40 per unit based on a minimum annual quantity of 300,000 units; 0.65 per unit based

  • 7/24/2019 IMC Midterm Case Study

    3/3