43
Integrating Prevention & Treatment of Substance Use Disorders with Primary Care Webinar – June 19, 2013 Patrick Gauthier AHP Healthcare Solutions 1

Integrating Prevention & Treatment of Substance Use Disorders with Primary Care Webinar – June 19, 2013 Patrick Gauthier AHP Healthcare Solutions 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Integrating Prevention & Treatment of Substance Use Disorders with Primary Care

Webinar – June 19, 2013

Patrick GauthierAHP Healthcare Solutions

1

PROBLEM Fragmentation Marginalization Discrimination High Costs Poor Quality and Outcomes High Morbidity and Mortality High Societal Costs Multiple Chronic Conditions

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF SPENDING ON HEALTH, 1980–2010

19

80

19

82

19

84

19

86

19

88

19

90

19

92

19

94

19

96

19

98

20

00

20

02

20

04

20

06

20

08

20

10

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

USSWIZNETHCANGERFRAUSUKJPN

3

Average spending on healthper capita ($US PPP)

19

80

19

82

19

84

19

86

19

88

19

90

19

92

19

94

19

96

19

98

20

00

20

02

20

04

20

06

20

08

20

10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

USNETHFRGERCANSWIZUK

Total health expenditures aspercent of GDP

Notes: PPP = purchasing power parity; GDP = gross domestic product.Source: Commonwealth Fund, based on OECD Health Data 2012.

HEALTH CARE COSTS CONCENTRATED IN SICK FEW—SICKEST 10 PERCENT ACCOUNT FOR 65 PERCENT OF EXPENSES

Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality analysis of 2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Distribution of health expenditures for the U.S. population, by magnitude of expenditure, 2009

1%5%

10%

50%

65%

22%

50%

97%

$90,061

$40,682

$26,767

$7,978

Annual mean expenditure

CAUSES OF PREMATURE DEATH

N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 20;357(12):1221-8.

30%

15%

5%10%

40%

Proportional Contribution to Premature Death

Genetic disposi-tionSocial cir-cumstancesEnvironmental exposureHealth careBehavioral pat-terns

SOLUTION

Applying the Chronic Care Model in Integrated Practice Developing an Informed, Activated

Patient Using Information Technology Developing a Prepared, Proactive Practice

Teams Re-Organizing Healthcare System to

Include SUD Treatment, Prevention, Health and Wellness

INTEGRATING SUD WITH MH AND PRIMARY CARE Pre-Reform = special pilot programs and

grant-funded initiatives Post-Reform = Chronic Care Model,

Triple Aim, Accountable Care Organizations, Patient-Centered Medical Homes, and Health Homes Integration via ConsolidationDe-Institutionalization and focus on

community-based carePrimary Care locus and “medicalization”Reimbursement reforms and shared risk

ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS

Dartmouth Institute

There are over 400 recognized ACOs today. More than 30 in California

PRIMARY CARE MEDICAL HOMES

PRIMARY CARE MEDICAL HOME

INTEGRATION: BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE“the field concerned with the development of behavioral science knowledge and techniques relevant to the understanding of physical health and illness and the application of this knowledge and techniques to prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation”

Yale Conference on Behavioral Medicine

SUPPORT FOR INTEGRATED MODELS One study showed that medical costs of patients with

chronic diseases reduced by 20% if these patients received behavioral health interventions, but increased by 17% to 27% if they were treated in traditional office settings

Another study of non-diabetic patients showed that lifestyle (behavioral) changes reduced the incidence of diabetes by 58% compared to patients who received the placebo therapy

One analysis of 91 studies showed that medical utilization decreased by an average of 15.7% over baseline following behavioral intervention, compared with an increase of 12.3% without behavioral intervention, and thus yielded an overall 28% cost return

BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE TARGETS

Adolescent HealthAgingArthritisAsthmaCancerCardiovascular

Disease (heart disease, hypertension, stroke),

Children's HealthChronic PainCystic Fibrosis

DepressionDiabetesEating Disorders HIV/AIDS Obesity Pulmonary Disease Substance Use

Disorders including Smoking Cessation

Women's Health

KEY STRATEGIESLifestyle Changes Improve nutrition, increase physical activity, stop smoking, use medications appropriately, practice safer sex, prevent and reduce alcohol and drug abuse.

Training Coping, relaxation, self-monitoring, stress management, time management, pain management, problem-solving, communication skills, time management, priority-setting.

Social Support Group education, caretaker support and training, health counseling, community-based sports events

KEY STRATEGIES Integrating behavioral medicine

strategies into primary care and managed care;

Increasing public awareness of behavioral interventions;

Including effective behavioral interventions in development of clinical practice guidelines;

Increasing use of information technology for behavioral interventions;

Improving integration of research and practice

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Approximately one in four Americans has

MCC, including one in 15 children. Among Americans aged 65 years and older,

as many as three out of four persons have MCC. In addition, approximately two out of three Medicare beneficiaries have MCC.

People with MCC are also at increased risk for mortality and poorer day-to-day functioning.

MCC are associated with substantial health care costs in the United States. Approximately 66 percent of the total health care spending is associated with care for the over one in four Americans with MCC.

OBJECTIVESIdentify evidence‐supported models for persons with multiple chronic conditions to improve care coordination

Define appropriate health care outcomes for individuals with multiple chronic conditions

Develop payment reform and incentives

Implement and effectively use health information technology

Promote efforts to prevent the occurrence of new chronic conditions and to mitigate the consequences of existing conditions

Perform purposeful evaluation of models of care, incentives, and other health system interventions

OBJECTIVES

Facilitate self-care management

Facilitate home and community‐based services

Provide tools for medication management

Identify best practices and tools

Enhance health professionals’ training

Address multiple chronic conditions in guidelines

ELEMENTS OF INTEGRATED CARE

Integrated Services Integrated Teams Cross-functional Screenings/Assessments Integrated Treatment Planning Tools Cross-trained Practitioners Stage-wise Treatment Motivational Interventions Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Integrated Medication Management Integrated Billing Integrated Outcomes and Quality

OTHER SETTINGS Community Mental Health Centers Federally-Qualified Health Centers Emergency Departments Critical Access Hospitals (25 and fewer

beds) Rural Health Centers Primary Care Clinics/Community Health

Centers Public Health Correctional Facilities

SETTINGDistance

• Consult• Referral• Case

Management

Onsite

• Screening • Treatment• Case Mgmt.• Specialized

Services

Integrated

• Shared Care Plans• Coordinated Care/Case Mgmt.• Shared Infrastructure and Business

Model/Financials• Integrated satisfaction, quality and

outcomes measures

IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS Networking and Affiliation Business Model and Marketing Material Agreements Revenue Share/financial model Reimbursement reforms Billing for Case Management/Care

Coordination

IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS Knowledge barriers Stigma and cultural differences Privacy laws Willingness to collaborate and partner Access to capital Structure and governance Health IT infrastructure compatibility

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES Integrate EBP into policies and

procedures Assess training needs Share tools and expertise across

boundaries Monitor and evaluate regularly Ensure services are culturally competent

THE SYSTEM OF CARE: GOALS & OBJECTIVESGOAL 1:Improve the Coordination of Behavioral Health Services with Primary Care and Supportive Services and Maximize the Use of Available Resources to Effectively Address Behavioral Healthcare Needs by Reducing Fragmentation and Ensuring a Full Spectrum of Care

Source: Taking Integration to the Next Level: The Role of New Service Delivery Models in Behavioral Health. 2012 - Cornerstones for Behavioral Healthcare Resource Series. Joel E. Miller, Senior Director of Policy and Healthcare Reform National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD)

OBJECTIVES Accelerate the necessary linkages between

physical health care and behavioral health services to promote and achieve recovery for people with mental illnesses and/or substance abuse who also have chronic physical diseases.

Provide content expertise in the development and implementation of behavioral health aspects of service delivery system reforms such as medical homes, health homes and accountable care organizations, and related payment initiatives such as bundling and capitation.

OBJECTIVES Accelerate the necessary linkages between

behavioral healthcare services and the array of supportive services (supported housing, employment, transportation, education and training, etc.)

Develop and implement effective behavioral health promotion, wellness and prevention activities.

Provide content expertise on the development of and inclusion of behavioral health quality measures in specifications for electronic health records, in the development of health information exchanges, and in public and private sector initiatives to improve the quality of behavioral healthcare.

OBJECTIVES Provide leadership to health providers, federal and

state policymakers and officials, national medical societies, including primary care organizations, to ensure the adequacy of providers in the behavioral health workforce to deliver quality behavioral health care services.

Empower consumers to maximize control of their recovery through new and emerging ways to design, apply and organize existing treatments and by finding new platforms and avenues to deliver new treatments.

Provide content expertise on benefits and scope and requirements for behavioral health services – in partnership with state insurance authorities – that are offered in public and private health insurance plans operating in the state.

OBJECTIVES Actively ensure the outreach and

enrollment of individuals with mental and substance use disorders so they may receive and maintain health coverage based on their eligibility and are able to easily access care.

CONDUCTING YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL

SCAN

Source: Mady Chalk, TRI

ACCOUNTABILITY Environment:

Major focus on medical home in primary care setting

Pressure to implement EHRsField still struggling with hand-offs and

transitions between levels of care/agencies

Co-morbidity (MH/SA and MED/SA) issues are still befuddling payers and providers

PATIENT/FAMILY ROLE

Environment:Focus on patient centered care Increase pressure on offering choice of

providerNew eligibles—different age/socio-

economic group—maybe more vocal about their treatment and treatment options

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS

EnvironmentImplementing National Quality Forum

(NQF) Standards of CareDecreasing drop-outs/increasing

engagement, retention, and continuing care

Increasing use of medications as part of comprehensive treatment

Continuous monitoring during treatment and use of data to adapt treatment services during treatment

SUD ROLE IN HEALTH CARE Environment:

Increase access to treatment through FQHCs

SBIRT is both an NQF Standard and consider important to provide in healthcare settings

Medi-Cal authorities’ decision-making process about changes in benefits, providers, services and reimbursement

Pressures by health plans to have credentialed practitioners deliver services

Linking health and specialty care is considered critical

ACCESS Environment:

Access is still a premium to payersStill defined in fairly traditional termsMedi-Cal, payers, managed care

organizations and the Department of Insurance will be tracking access for newly eligible patients more closely

Assumes new coverage = new or different utilization patterns and services

VALUE/COST

Environment: Identification of services/practices that add

valueProof or evidence to support purchasing

decisionsPayers more likely to define value in terms of

savings or offsets—not necessarily on improved health outcomes

Will have to show value to the customer who will have some “skin” in the game (deductibles, co-pays)

INTEGRATION

Environment:Developing standards for integrated careProviders are further along than payersAssumption that carve-ins will get you

closer to integrationReimbursement rules don’t necessarily

encourage integration at the practice level

Still focusing on differences versus similarities

Public payer silos continue to thwart integration

WORKFORCE

Environment:Payers equate a credentialed workforce with

quality although a significant portion of workforce is not credentialed

All over the map regarding a definition of competency (versus credentialed)

Good supervision is diverted by productivity expectations and reimbursement

Recovery support providers have momentum and creating formal networks to compete for dollars

ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN DELIVERY

Environment:Technology is moving faster than practiceThere are simple uses of technology to

enhance access (texting reminders)Investment in technology in the provider

community is spotty

TREATMENT INTERVENTIONS

Environment:Interventions should produce value and

we have evidence of what worksPressures exist to keep buying the “same

old”Payers don’t yet fully embrace newer

interventions – this is an “educated sale”We aren’t good at the “elevator speech”

in describing interventions

REIMBURSEMENT

Environment:Continued focus by payers on purchasing

units of services, some initial discussion re: purchasing episodes of care versus widgets

Providing integrated treatment made difficult by outdated reimbursement rules that preclude billing two services on same day from same address

Pay for performance strategies not widely used yet in SUD

Different payers/different rates/same services

NEXT STEPS Conduct Local Market Research Conduct Your Own Environmental Scan Develop Business Model/Integration

Model Begin Networking with Primary

Care/Settings Prepare Internally:

Board on boardStaff trained and ready to meet

requirements Infrastructure assessed and deployed

(staffing, EBPs, Tools, IT, etc.)Ready for new reimbursement, quality and

outcomes models, methods and measures

THANK YOU – QUESTIONS?Contact:Patrick GauthierDirectorAHP Healthcare [email protected]