Upload
beau-malone
View
33
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Spectroscopic-quality energy density functional and how to get there. Jacek Dobaczewski University of Warsaw & University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylä : Gillis Carlsson, Markus Kortelainen , Kazuhito Mizuyama, Jussi Toivanen Warsaw : Wojtek Satuła, Tomek Werner, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek DobaczewskiUniversity of Warsaw & University of Jyväskylä
Spectroscopic-quality energy densityfunctional and how to get there
DFT-UNEDF WorkshopJoint Institute for Heavy Ion Research, ORNL,
Oak Ridge, TN-37831, USAJanuary 22, 2008
Jyväskylä: Gillis Carlsson, Markus Kortelainen, Kazuhito Mizuyama, Jussi ToivanenWarsaw: Wojtek Satuła, Tomek Werner, Maciek Zalewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Outline
1. The Matrix for SkP.2. Dependence of single-particle energies on
coupling constants.3. Fits of spin-orbit and tensor coupling
constants.4. Error analysis in mass fits.5. Extensions in density dependence and
stability conditions.6. Extensions to higher powers of
derivatives.7. Extensions to higher powers of densities.
Jacek Dobaczewski
The bottom line
1. Spectroscopic-quality energy density functional correct description of positions and evolution of single-particle levels.
2. Single-particle levels correct description of one-particle separation energies with all polarization effects included.
3. Within the EDF method, shape and spin polarization effects in doubly-magic nuclei are relatively small – much smaller than deviations from data.
4. Dependence of total and single-particle energies on coupling constants is very linear.
5. No fits without error estimates and error propagation!
6. Extensions beyond the simple Skyrme functionals are mandatory.
Jacek Dobaczewski
Skyrme binding energy, saturation
density incompressibility,
enhancement factor, isospin symmetry
energy at 0 and 0/2;
(6 parameters)
Effective Mass
Skyrme surface energy
Spin-orbit strength W0
Average pairing matrix
element
NM binding energy saturation density incompressibility,
enhancement factor, isospin symmetry
energy at 0 and 0/2;
(6 “observables”)
1
Binding energies of 16O and 208Pb
Binding energies of 120-132Sn
Average pairing gap
The Matrix – SkP caseThe Matrix – SkP case
Jacek Dobaczewski
Nuclear Energy Density Functional
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
-0,0015
-0,0010
-0,0005
0,0000
0 2 4 6R(fm)
0,00
0,05
0,10
0 2 4 6
(de
nsit
y)/
C0
(a) kinetic
(b) particle
(c) spin-orbit
(a)
(c)
(b)
dens
ity
SLy540Ca
Jacek Dobaczewski
-0,1
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0 2 4 6 8
-60
-40
-20
0
20
0 2 4 6 8
R(fm)
(po
tent
ial)
/C
0
(a) kinetic
(b) central
(c) spin-orbit
(a)
(c)
(b)
pote
ntia
l
SLy540Ca
Jacek Dobaczewski
Mass, shape, and spin polarization effects
Jacek Dobaczewski
Polarization effects for spin-orbit
splitting
Fits of C0J, C0
J , and C1
J
Jacek Dobaczewski
Shell gaps
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
Jacek Dobaczewski
=1/6
Jacek Dobaczewski
=1/4
Jacek Dobaczewski
=1/6