Jesus en Apocalipsis 18, 1 y Problema Textual

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/26/2019 Jesus en Apocalipsis 18, 1 y Problema Textual

    1/5

    3.a. Variants: (1) (3rd pl. pf. from )] A C Andr f2031WHort. (2)

    () (3rd pl. pf. from )] 046 fam 10061006 1841fam 161116112030 Andr d f2056 l!16"8#$%antin&' Hippol$ts (d& Ant. 40)' op. (3) ()] fam 16111854*&m&nis20532062Andr +!2302n!242,. (4) ()] 051 Andr&as. (5) ] #oss&t (1,06) 41,. (6) (3rd pl. pf. from )] fam 1611232,Andr-#$% 21828s$r+' /is+&ndorf / ra&&'

    #. W&iss o+ann&s!Apoal$ps& 13"' on od&n /&7t' &stl&!Aland2"'#/4' /C/ 1"5"958' /C/ 2 683. (") ()] 025 Andr a f20235,8. (8) ] ,4 2042 20652432 s$rp+' C+arl&s 1:,6 344' #/1' #/2. /+& ariants diid& amon t+os&

    d&ri&d from ariants (1) t+ro+ (3) t+os& d&ri&d from ariants (4) t+ro+(") and t+os& d&ri&d from ariant (8). Variant (1) t+& nsal pf. form +as &&n orr&t&d in r&adins (2) and (3) (+mid tdi&n 2:141). Variant (") is anort+orap+ial ariant of ariant (4). &adin (1) t+& r&adin ;it+ t+&stron&st &7t&rnal att&station is also t+& l&tio diffiilior.

    s&& &lo;] t ar& s&mantiall$ id&ntial) t+&$ ar& r&?&t&d as s&mantiall$

    impossil& or inappropriat& $ most mod&rn ritial t&7ts and omm&ntators ;it+ t+&

    &7&ption of WHort. &&ral &rsions spport &it+&r r&adin ;it+ t+& translation @+a& fall&n(s$rp+opsa oarm &t+). *f t+& t;o morp+oloial ariants is proal$ t+& mor&oriinal sin& $ t+& first &ntr$ A.B. t+& 3rd pl. aor ind &ndin -inr&asinl$ r&pla&d t+&3rd pl. pf. ind &ndin -(i.&. t+& pf. ;as in pro&ss of assimilation to t+& aor' inarammar 2:354955) &.. in & 1,:3 andin 21:6. in& t+& old&r &ndin!is fond in &&lation onl$ in 8:2 () is proal$ t+& oriinalr&adin. /+& r&adin @dran a 3rd pl. pf. ind from @to drin is pr&f&rr&d$ most mod&rn ritial t&7ts and most omm&ntators ;+o omm&nt on t+& t&7t (&.. C+arl&sol. 2). && t+& ri&f disssion in /C/ 1 "5"958 (n. t+at = 2321 ontainin onl$ t+&

    osp&ls is &rron&osl$ it&d for 232,' t+& &rror ;as noti&d $ . . Dlliott o/ 25 >1,83]

    128 and orr&t&d $ #or&r/

    52 >1,8"] 50951 t non&t+&l&ss arri&d o&r into /C/2 683)' mor& &7t&nsi& disssions ar& fond in +mid tdi&n 2:141943 and #or&r /

    52 (1,8") 50951. E&t t+& = att&station for t+is r&adin is &7tr&m&l$ ;&a (&rsions t+at r&ad

    @+a& drn inld& iti /$onis #&ats s$rp+). &&rt+&l&ss it +as &&n pr&f&rr&d sin& a&r m&anin @to drin ma&s m+ mor& s&ns& t+an on& m&anin @to fall.

    opCoptic versions#yzThe reading of the majority of Byzantine MSS

    T Graece;estamentum or New TestamentBSGNTUnited Bi!e Societies Gree" New Testament/CGNTB#M# Metzger$ % Te&tua! Commentary on the Gree" New Testament=S attestaph Series or Manuscript

    pfs that dtsarm eth'#ian versionaoraoristind endingtive

    ovTNovum Testamentum/(uTheo!ogische (undschauit)ta!a or *!d +ating Tyconiuu!gate ,as pu!ished in -eer.s edition'

    /

  • 7/26/2019 Jesus en Apocalipsis 18, 1 y Problema Textual

    2/5

    & 14:8 (s&& 1":2) proid&s an &7tr&m&l$ los& parall&l: ! " @all nations +a& drn from t+& ;in& nam&l$ t+&;rat+ of +&r forniation. H&r& t+& pf. ind ati& (3rd sin. in ar&&m&nt ;it+ t+&n&t. pl. s?&t' s&& #B F 133.1) from l&arl$ indiat&s t+& propri&t$ of r&adin() or &&n in 18:3. E&t it an also & ar&d t+at an oriinal

    in 18:3 (l&arl$ t+& l&tio diffiilior) old +a& &&n orr&t&d from 14:8 (t+at t+isin fat orr&d is l&ar in m$ opinion from t+& ;&al$ spport&d ariant in 18:3spport&d onl$ $ ,4 2042 2065 2432 and s$rp+ &&n t+o+ it app&ar&d in t+& t&7t of

    #/1and #/2and ;as &arli&r spport&d $ C+arl&s 1:,6 344).Ho; old t+& mor& diffilt r&adin or +a& r&pla&d an oriinal

    or G ossil$ t+ro+ assimilation to t+& &rs " "in 18:2' i.&.as #a$lon f&ll so did t+& nations (C+arl&s 1:,6' /C/ 1 "5"958). +mid r&?&ts as not

    fll$ oninin t+& possiilit$ of an &rror of t+& &$& or +and in op$in inst&ad oft+& &r$ similar t oriinal ' +& rat+&r s&sts t+at t+& oriinal r&adin ompl&t&l$ disapp&ar&d t+ro+ misr&adin i.&. an &rror of t+& &ar and t+at it ;as orr&t&d

    proal$ t+ro+ t+& infl&n& of 14:8 (tdi&n 2:143). E&t sin& or is

    t+& r&adin in so man$ = and &rsions it is l&arl$ not as @impossil& as man$ sppos&(C+arl&s 1:,6). /+&r& is in fat a pror&ssion from @+ad drn of 14:8 to# @;&r& into7iat&d of 1":2 to @+ad ollaps&d of 18:3.

    3.!. Variants: (1) ] 046 fam 10061006Andr&as ,41""3 #$%antin& itd&mopsa omss. (2) ] 051 Andr&as itiopopart

    Hippol$ts (d& Ant. 40). (3) ] A fam 16111611*&m&nis2053 2062itast

    opomss. (4) ] fam 16111854s$rp+rimasis #&ats. (5) ] C. A C and *&m&nis r&fl&t t+& omission of t+ro+ srialar&l&ssn&ss (/C/ 1 "5"' /C/ 2 683) an omission pr&sppos&d in r&adin (2) ;+&r&

    it +as &&n r&stor&d t at an inorr&t loation (+mid tdi&n 2:,3).

    3.. is a &n. of apposition or an &p&7&&tial &n. proidin in &ff&t anall&orial int&rpr&tation of . $

    /9/?; repr# /977'@//#c# introduces a c!ause that provides the reason for the statement in the precedingc!ause and shou!d therefore e trans!ated in a causa! sense$ e#g#$ 5for$A 5ecause#A )n the *T$

  • 7/26/2019 Jesus en Apocalipsis 18, 1 y Problema Textual

    3/5

    3.&. is an aor ;it+ t+& al& of a pf. (=ssi&s =orp+olo$ 338).3.f. && ot& 3.d.M

    3.. $#is an aor ;it+ t+& al& of a pf. (=ssi&s =orp+olo$ 338).3.+!+.

  • 7/26/2019 Jesus en Apocalipsis 18, 1 y Problema Textual

    4/5

    '()*+,-.'/ /'0-) 1)/2/ )* 34'5,6.4/./ 7897

    :,;.< 3=*)> Revelation?'-< @.06.5,6 '(()*+,-A

    B C D %E @and t+& &art+ ;as illminat&d $ +is spl&ndor. /+is

    p+ras& is a r&lati&l$ los& r&nd&rin of t+& H&r&; t&7t of D%& 43:2 @t+& &art+ s+on& ;it++is lor$ (r&f&rrin +o;&&r to Ea+;&+) ;+i+ &7+iits s&&ral diff&r&n&s from t+&LNN&rsion (Van+o$& #i 43 >1,62] 43"). /+is is t+& onl$ instan& in &&lation in ;+i+ an

    an&li &in is d&sri&d as +ain %E @lor$ spl&ndor a t&rm sall$ r&s&r&d as ad&sination for t+& pr&s&n& of od (& 15:8' 21:11 23' s&& Comm&nt on 15:8).2

    Gregory Beale, Revelation, New International Greek Testament Commentary

    As t+ro+ot t+& oo ! (@aft&r t+&s& t+ins) r&f&rs to t+& t&mporal ord&r of t+&isions from t+& s&&rOs i&;point not to a +ronoloial ord&r of &&nts in +istor$. /+&

    d&s&ndin an&l ma$ & t is not n&&ssaril$ t+& sam& on& t+at introd&d t+& ision in 1":1.

    His @r&at at+orit$ onfirms t+& alidit$ of t+& follo;in m&ssa& of ?dm&nt. /+&onldin r&f&r&n& to t+& ara of t+& an&lOs @lor$ &mp+asi%&s +is attrit& of at+orit$

    (H&r&; kbd is translat&d as %E in LNN ;+&r& it som&tim&s r&f&rs to a partilar

    attrit& of od and som&tim&s alld&s to t+& sm of odOs attrit&s).

    @/+& &art+ s+on& ;it+ a li+t from t+& lor$ arond od ;+&n D%&i&l sa; a ision of t+&&nd!tim& r&storation of t+& n&; &rsal&m] and t+& lamp of it is t+& Lam. #t it is still possil&

    t+at t+& fir& in 18:1 is a m&r& an&l r&fl&tin t+& diin& lor$.3

    L

    #

    20avid

  • 7/26/2019 Jesus en Apocalipsis 18, 1 y Problema Textual

    5/5

    Grant Osborne, Revelation, Baker Exegetical Commentary

    Also in ontrast to t+& &ast t+is an&l +as t;o +arat&ristis. Kirst +& poss&ss&sE

    $(exousian megaln r&at at+orit$) ompar&d to t+& d&ri&d at+orit$ of t+& &ast

    (from t+& draon 13:2 and from od 13:5). &ond C D %E (h

    g ephtisth ek ts doxs autou t+& &art+ ;as illmin&d ;it+ +is lor$) ;+il& t+&

    m&m&rs of t+& fals& trinit$ do not poss&ss @lor$ in t+& Apoal$ps&.