Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kobe University Repository : Kernel
タイトルTit le
Preliminary Report on Arsenic and Some RelatedComponents in Tube-well Waters from the High andLow Arsenic Groundwater Areas Near Dhaka,Bangladesh
著者Author(s)
Terakado, Yasutaka / Asagoe, Yuma / Koga, Toshiki /Nasher, N.M.Refat
掲載誌・巻号・ページCitat ion
神戸大学大学院人間発達環境学研究科研究紀要,9(1):73-80
刊行日Issue date 2015-09
資源タイプResource Type Departmental Bullet in Paper / 紀要論文
版区分Resource Version publisher
権利Rights
DOI
URL http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/handle_kernel/81009126
Create Date: 2017-12-18
(73)
- -73
神戸大学大学院人間発達環境学研究科 研究紀要 第9巻 第1号 2015
Bulletin of Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Vol.9 No.1 2015REPORT
* Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Japan
** Faculty of Human Development, Kobe University, Japan
*** Department of Geography and Environment, Jagannath University, Bangladesh.(Received March 31, 2015
Accepted April 15, 2015)
1. Introduction
It is well known that arsenic is a toxic element and drink-
ing arsenic-rich water over a long period results in various
health problems, which leads to establishing standards for
drinking waters. For example, the World Health Organiza-
tion has given a provisional guideline value of 10 µg/L for ar-
senic in drinking-water (WHO, 2011). Arsenic poisoning is es-
pecially serious when people have no choice but to get
drinking waters from wells, because concentrations of arsenic
in some groundwaters are significantly elevated (sometimes
up to 12 mg/L) (WHO, 2011).
Such examples are seen in the Bangladesh and West Ben-
gal area, and a tragic history is briefly as follows (e.g., Smith
et al., 2000; Ravenscroft et al., 2009): People in Bangladesh
used river or pond water for drinking and cooking and conse-
quently infants and children suffered from acute gastrointes-
tinal disease resulting from bacterial contamination of water.
To provide bacteriologically-safe source of drinking water, the
use of tube-well accelerated particularly after 1970, partly as a
result of a deliberate policy promoted by the United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF). However, in these days, arsenic
was not recognized as a problem in water supplies. In 1983,
the first cases of arsenic-induced skin lesions were identified in
India (Saha, 1995). The increased number of tube-wells in
1990s caused serious arsenic-induced diseases, and the problem
of arsenic contaminated water received extensive attention. It
was in middle 1990s that such arsenic poisoning was recog-
nized in Bangladesh, and it has been considered that the
transformation took place in India and Bangladesh between
1994 and 1998. Afterwards, many geochemical researches on
groundwaters have been performed focusing on mechanism of
arsenic release to groundwater (e.g., Saha and Chakrabarti,
1995; Dhar et al., 1997; Nickson et al., 2000; BGS/DPHE, 2001;
Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2001; Itai, 2011).
Sources, mechanisms and other related factors on arsenic
pollution of groundwater have been examined (e.g., Smedley
and Kinniburgh, 2001: Ravenscroft et al., 2009), which include
(1) Mobilization by reductive dissolution; (2) Mobilization by
alkali desorption; (3) Mobilization by sulfide oxidation; (4)
Source minerals, etc. However, we feel that there seem to re-
main unsolved problems of how such groundwaters are
formed. Moreover, in relevance to the arsenic problem, behav-
iors of other elements are interesting, and Bangladesh is a
nice research field for various investigations of groundwaters,
because there are many wells from which we can collect sam-
ples.
Abstract:The major and some trace elements of 18 groundwater samples from near Dhaka, Bangladesh were analyzed
to examine high arsenic groundwater genesis and to obtain fundamental data for further investigations on trace
element geochemistry. The results are consistent with those reported previously for the groundwaters from the
Bangladesh and West Bengal areas. Thus the model concerning reductive dissolution of Fe-hydroxides is considered to
be plausible as a basic formation process of arsenic-rich groundwaters. However, the data obtained suggest
participation of some other processes which overlap with the basic process.
Keywords: groundwater, arsenic, Bangladesh, well-water, aquifer
Preliminary report on arsenic and some related components in tube-well waters
from the high and low arsenic groundwater areas near Dhaka, Bangladesh
Yasutaka TERAKADO* Yuma ASAGOE** Toshiki KOGA** N. M. Refat NASHER***
(74)
- -74
The study area, the middle part of Bangladesh, is located
in a delta plain at the confluence of the Ganges (Padma),
Brahmaputra (Jamuna), and Meghna Rivers and their tribu-
taries (Fig. 1). The areal distribution of the arsenic concentra-
tions of well-waters in Bangladesh is previously established,
and the contrast between high and low As concentrations are
conspicuous as shown in Fig. 1-B (DPHE/BGS/DFID, 2001).
Moreover, the low As concentration area almost corresponds
to the residual deposit area as shown in Fig. 1-C (USGS, 2001).
The aims of our Bangladesh groundwater project is to reex-
amine the various genetic models proposed previously and to
obtain better understanding of the genesis of these groundwa-
ters using trace element data, such as rare earth elements
which have scarcely been examined. As part of such project,
we would like to report some concentration data of commonly
analyzed components and briefly discuss about the genesis of
these groundwaters.
2. Samples and Analytical Methods
Samples collections were made during January 6 to Janu-
ary 11, 2015, and the sampling sites are indicated in Fig. 1-A.
The pH measurements were made on-site for unfiltered water
with a handy pH meter (PH-6011A CUSTOM) calibrated with
pH 7 and pH 4 standard solutions. The waters were filtered
using 0.45μm membrane filter. Alkalinity was titrated on a
filtered sample using 0.02 N sulfuric acid to pH 4.8. The sam-
ples were stored in polyethylene bottles which were washed in
advance using boiled hydrochloric acid and hot pure water.
The depth data were heard from people around the wells.
The sample bottles were transported to the laboratory in
Kobe University under ambient temperatures. After arrival
of the samples, the samples were stored in refrigerator imme-
diately for anion measurements, and for the sample bottles
for cation analyses, purified hydrochloric acid were added and
stored at room temperature.
The concentrations of F-, Cl-, Br-, NO2-, NO3
- and SO42-
were measured by ion chromatograph with Hitachi HPLC
system during January 16 to 18. The Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe and
Mn were determined by atomic absorption method using Sr as
an interference suppressor on Hitach Z-2010. Fe, Mn, Si and P
were measured by ICP optical emission spectrometry with
Shimadzu ICPS-1000IV. Total inorganic arsenic concentra-
tions were analyzed by hydride generation atomic absorption
spectrometry using a hydride generator HYD-10 (Nippon Jar-
rell Ash Co., Japan) and with Hitachi Z-2010. In order to re-
duce arsenate, 3.75 mL of 50% KI solution and 8.75 mL of 6 M
HCl were added to 50 mL sample before starting the HYD-10
processing, and pre-heating furnace of HYD-10 was applied.
The solutions of 50% KI and 2.5% sodium tetrahydroborate
were newly prepared at time of use. The detection limits were
estimated from the variations of the blank measurements.
Overall, reproducibility and precision for each analysis were
less than 3%. The ionic balance errors were usually less than
±2% aside from a few samples.
Fig. 1 Maps showing the sampling localities (A), the spatial arsenic distribution data reported in the literatures (B), and the geologic map for the study area (C).
(75)
- -75
3. Results
The analytical data are listed in Table 1. The pH values
for all of the groundwater samples are almost neutral rang-
ing from 6.7 to 7.2. The alkalinities (Alk) for the northern
samples (N1~N7) range from 1.95 to 3.42 meq/L, and are
smaller than those for the southern samples (S1~S5 and
B1~B4) ranging from 4.02 to 9.04 meq/L. These ranges for the
northern and southern samples are clearly discriminated,
which is consistent with the previously obtained tendency for
the low and high As groundwaters (Fig. 1-B) and with the ge-
ologic difference as seen in Fig. 1-C (DPHD/BGS/DFID, 2000;
USGS, 2001). The lowest Alk of the groundwater samples of
this study is 1.95 meq/L from the northern area, and this val-
ue is close to 1.81 meq/L of Padma river sample (R1).
In Fig. 2, the concentrations of various components are
plotted against Alk. Most elements show vague positive
trends. The plots on Mg and F show relatively good positive
correlations (see Fig. 2). The points of the Na, P, K, Ca, Fe
and Mn plots are scattered largely, but lack of relatively high
concentration points of these elements in the lower Alk range
Table 1. Analytical results.
Date Depth T pH Alk Na K Mg Ca Mn
sample M/D m (℃ ) meq/L ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
N1 1/7 76 23 7.0 3.42 23.5 0.89 11.0 31.7 0.13
N2 1/7 61 23 6.9 3.37 24.1 1.10 11.1 29.3 0.12
N3 1/8 91 23 6.9 3.25 24.3 1.05 8.91 29.2 b.d.
N4 1/8 0 23 6.7 1.95 13.6 1.12 6.26 17.1 b.d.
N5 1/8 61 26 6.8 3.38 23.2 1.10 11.7 29.4 0.16
N6 1/8 0 26 6.8 3.39 26.4 0.91 9.71 30.1 0.21
N7 1/8 37 25 6.7 3.35 21.6 1.02 10.9 33.3 0.19
S1 1/9 76 7.4 7.11 80.1 1.09 21.1 48.6 1.4
S2 1/9 67 25 7.1 7.56 19.8 4.80 35.5 51.0 0.12
S3 1/9 229 25 6.9 5.57 212 2.12 12.2 24.5 0.18
S4 1/10 21 23 7.3 9.04 149 2.59 22.4 40.2 0.91
S5 1/10 0 22 7.2 8.75** 29.3 2.93 36.2 84.8 0.59
S6 1/10 61 25 7.1 7.27 20.5 4.56 21.6 94.0 0.18
S7 1/10 73 26 7.3 7.20 185 3.32 13.6 31.6 0.059*
R1 1/10 0 8.1 1.81 4.86 2.19 6.42 29.0 b.d.
B1 1/11 37 25 7.2 7.30 166 1.89 20.3 31.1 0.90
B2 1/11 46 24 7.3 4.02 15.4 2.57 13.9 65.4 0.71
B3 1/11 37 23 7.2 6.73 14.1 4.03 20.4 95.0 0.36
B4 1/11 46 21 7.0 8.96 59.8 5.33 28.4 138 3.6
Fe Si P As F Cl NO2 Br NO3 SO4
sample ppm ppm ppm ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
N1 b.d. 32.2 0.11 b.d. 0.24 2.83 b.d. b.d. 0.27 0.21
N2 b.d. 33.8 0.13 b.d. 0.21 1.74 b.d. b.d. 0.058 0.29
N3 b.d. 34.3 0.13 b.d. 0.18 1.35 b.d. 0.047 0.050 0.30
N4 b.d. 38.0 0.123 b.d. 0.16 0.78 b.d. 0.17 0.35 0.51
N5 0.33 32.6 0.13 b.d. 0.28 1.67 b.d. b.d. 0.70 0.27
N6 0.17* 32.0 0.17 b.d. 0.29 1.48 b.d. b.d. 0.42 0.31
N7 0.16* 33.3 0.17 b.d. 0.22 2.14 b.d. b.d. 0.034 0.12
S1 b.d. 21.8 0.13 b.d. n.d. 15.3 b.d. 0.31 0.033 0.52
S2 8.8 20.6 1.36 134 n.d. 4.62 0.017 0.045 0.16 0.060
S3 2.4 25.2 0.18 b.d. 0.36 206 b.d. 1.1 0.14 6.3
S4 1.9 13.6 0.59 73 0.50 50.2 b.d. 0.77 0.044 0.38
S5 3.4 17.9 0.44 112 0.21 26.1 b.d. 0.20 0.16 0.037
S6 5.7 19.8 1.96 193 n.d. 17.0 b.d. 0.26 0.057 0.11
S7 1.4 12.5 0.53 190 0.28 127 b.d. 1.0 0.084 0.076
R1 b.d. 5.5 0.056 1.2* 0.069 1.91 b.d. b.d. 0.14 17.5
B1 0.74 19.8 0.40 b.d. n.d. b.d. 1.1 0.041 7.6
B2 1.1 18.3 0.59 60 n.d. 11.8 b.d. 0.13 0.18 30.8
B3 7.5 15.1 1.20 222 n.d. 14.9 b.d. 0.083 0.10 0.015
B4 15.1 25.0 1.45 203 n.d. 106 b.d. 0.60 0.088 34.0
b.d. : below detection limit. Mn=0.028 ppm, Fe=0.067 ppm, As=1.1 ppb, *: below determination limit**: value based on ion balancebalnak : not determined
(76)
- -76
indicates positive tendency rather than negative one. On the
other hand, Si and NO3- seem to show negative tendencies.
The data of chloride and sulfate ions are considerably ambigu-
ous.
The total arsenic concentrations of the northern samples
(N-1 to -7) are below the detection limit (1.1 ppb), which is con-
sistent with the geographical distribution pattern of As (Fig.
1-B). On the other hand, the south area samples (S1-S7 & B1-
B4) include the high As groundwaters (60.5-222 ppb), which is
also consistent with the regional As distributions. However,
some samples from the south areas have concentrations less
than the detection limit, and there may be clear distinction
between high and low As wells. In Fig. 3, the relationships
between As concentrations and other parameters are shown.
The As-Alk, As-K, As-P and As-Fe relationships suggest posi-
tive correlations, while negative tendency may exist in the As-
Mn plot. The As-SO42- data are very ambiguous.
The NO2- signal on the chromatographic charts was not
obtained for most samples, but an obvious peak was observed
on the S2 chart, and this sample have second highest Fe con-
centration, suggesting reducing state. In Fig. 4, Na or Br
data are plotted against Cl. The rough correlations are seen
Fig. 2 Relatioships between alkalinity and various concentration data.
- 4 -
previously obtained tendency for the low and high As groundwaters (Fig. 1-B) and with the geologic difference as seen in Fig. 1-C (DPHD/BGS/DFID, 2000; USGS, 2001). The lowest Alk of the groundwater samples of this study is 1.95 meq/L from the northern area, and this value is close to 1.81 meq/L of Padma river sample (R1). In Fig. 2, the concentrations of various components are plotted against Alk. Most elements show vague positive trends.
The plots on Mg and F show relatively good positive correlations (see Fig. 2). The points of the Na, P, K, Ca, Fe and Mn plots are scattered largely, but lack of relatively high concentration points of these elements in the lower Alk range indicates positive tendency rather than negative one. On the other hand, Si and NO3− seem to show negative tendencies. The data of chloride and sulfate ions are considerably ambiguous.
The total arsenic concentrations of the northern samples (N-1
0
100
200
300
0
2
4
6
Na (ppm)
K (ppm)
0
10
20
30
40 Mg (ppm)
0
50
100
150 Ca (ppm)
0
20
40Si (ppm)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0 P (ppm)
1
2
3
4Mn (ppm)
0
10
Fe (ppm)
0 2 4 6 8 100
100
200
R1B1 - B4
Cl- (ppm)
0 2 4 6 8 100.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
N1 - N7S1 - S7
NO3- (ppm)
0 2 4 6 8 100
20
40
SO42- (ppm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
F- (ppm)
Fig. 2 Relatioships between alkalinity and various concentration data.
(77)
- -77
in both plots. It is interesting that some samples such as S3,
S7 and B4 have very high Na and Cl concentrations, suggest-
ing involvement of seawater. However, these data points devi-
ate from the line corresponding to the Cl/Na weight ratio of
1.8 for seawater (e.g., Turekian, 1968) (Fig. 4A). Moreover,
the data points on the Cl-Br plot also deviate from the seawa-
ter weight Cl/Br ratio of 288 (e.g., Turekian, 1968) (Fig. 4B).
These observations suggest that Cl- ions in these groundwa-
ters are not simply originated from seawater. As for Fe-Mn
data (Fig. 5A), a negative tendency is seen aside from one high
Fe and Mn sample (B4), although such tendency is crucial and
more data are necessary. A broad positive correlation is seen
in the Fe-P plot (Fig. 5B).
4. Discussion
The general mechanisms causing arsenic-rich groundwa-
ters have been pointed out in order of decreasing importance
as follows (e.g., Ravenscroft et al., 2009):
(1) Dissolution of As adsorbed iron oxides under reducing
condition mainly due to break down of organic matter.
The groundwater which belongs to this type is character-
ized by high iron and bicarbonate concentrations, while
nitrate and sulfate are absent.
(2) Desorption of As from iron oxides or other minerals under
elevated pH condition, which can explain alkali-oxic wa-
ters.
(3) Decomposition of iron sulfide minerals which contain As
via oxidation. Pyrite and arsenopyrite are the well known
As containing minerals.
(4) As release from geothermal fluids such as hot spring wa-
ters.
The forth mechanism is not adequate for the Bangladesh
groundwaters, because geothermal activity is not common in
Bangladesh. Two hot springs are known, Boga lake and
Sitakunda, but both areas are incompatible with the high As
areas of the spatial distribution map such as shown in Fig.
Fig. 3 Relationships between arsenic and various elements. The symbols are the same as those in Fig. 2.
- 5 -
to -7) are below the detection limit (1.1 ppb), which is consistent with the geographical distribution pattern of As (Fig. 1-B). On the other hand, the south area samples (S1-S7 & B1-B4) include the high As groundwaters (60.5−222 ppb), which is also consistent with the regional As distributions. However, some samples from the south areas have concentrations less than the detection limit, and there may be clear distinction between high and low As wells. In Fig. 3, the relationships between As concentrations and other parameters are shown. The As-Alk, As-K, As-P and As-Fe relationships suggest positive correlations, while negative tendency may exist in the As-Mn plot. The As-SO42− data are very ambiguous. The NO2− signal on the chromatographic charts was not obtained for most samples, but an obvious peak was observed on the S2 chart, and this sample have second highest Fe concentration, suggesting reducing state. In Fig. 4, Na or Br data are plotted against Cl. The rough correlations are seen in both plots. It is interesting that some samples such as S3, S7
and B4 have very high Na and Cl concentrations, suggesting involvement of seawater. However, these data points deviate from the line corresponding to the Cl/Na weight ratio of 1.8 for seawater (e.g., Turekian, 1968) (Fig. 4A). Moreover, the data points on the Cl-Br plot also deviate from the seawater weight Cl/Br ratio of 288 (e.g., Turekian, 1968) (Fig. 4B). These observations suggest that Cl− ions in these groundwaters are not simply originated from seawater. As for Fe-Mn data (Fig. 5A), a negative tendency is seen aside from one high Fe and Mn sample (B4), although such tendency is crucial and more data are necessary. A broad positive correlation is seen in the Fe-P plot (Fig. 5B).
4. Discussion
The general mechanisms causing arsenic-rich groundwaters have been pointed out in order of decreasing importance as follows (e.g., Ravenscroft et al., 2009): (1) Dissolution of As adsorbed iron oxides under reducing
Mn (ppm)
0 1 4
As (ppb)
100
200
Mg (ppm)0 20 40
As (ppb)
0
100
200
P (ppm)0 1 2
As (ppb)
0
100
200
K (ppm)0 2 4 6
As (ppb)
0
100
200
SO42- (ppm)
0 20 30
As (ppb)
0
100
200
0.5
Alkalinity (meq/L)0 2 4 6 8 10
As (ppb)
100
200
pH6.5 7.0 8.0
As (ppb)
100
200
Fe (ppm)
0 5 10 15
As (ppb)
0
100
200
Depth (m)0 50 100 250
As (ppm)
0
100
200
Fig. 3 Relationships between arsenic and various elements. The symbols are the same as those in Fig. 2.
(78)
- -78
1B. Moreover, the features of Sitakunda hot spring, for ex-
ample, are much lower grade than typical hot spring ones, and
therefore its effect must be limited: the temperature is rather
low (26.1 to 29.8 ℃ during winter) and the total alkalinity and
chlorine content range from 12 to 20 mg/L and 13.9 to 18.3
mg/L, respectively (Hossain and Anwar, 2009).
As a whole, it can be said that the mutual relationships
among various concentration data obtained in the present
study are similar to those reported by the previous investiga-
tors (e.g., McArthur et al., 2004). Therefore, on the basis of
the summary of Ravenscroft et al., (2009), the first model (re-
ductive dissolution) seems to be plausible. The fundamental
reaction of the first model can be represented by the following
redox reaction which has been examined by many investiga-
tors (e.g., Hem, 1977; Langmuir, 1997):
8 FeOOH + CH3COOH + 14 H2CO3 ⇒
8 Fe2+ + 16 HCO3- + 12 H2O
Combining this reaction to another fundamental fact that As
and P are tend to be involved in Fe hydroxides (e.g., Williams
et al., 1976; Antelo et al., 2005; Violante et al., 2009), the cor-
relations among Fe, As, P and HCO3- concentrations can be
interpreted by dissolution of Fe hydroxides which contain As
and P. In this relation, the third model (sulfide oxidation
model) in which the opposite redox condition is assumed does
not meet the observed data.
The second desorption model seems to be unclear in litera-
tures. For example, adsorption of arsenate onto most oxides
and clays decreases significantly at pH>8.0, but there tends to
be a peak in the region of pH 6 to 8 for Al oxide and Al-rich
clays (Ravenscroft et al., 2009). Moreover, the adsorption of
As(V) on ferrihydrite is sensitive to the concentrations of
phosphate, silica and organic acids, which could explain de-
sorption of As(V) in oxic waters at slightly lower pH than
otherwise expected (Ravenscroft et al., 2009). Thus, it is diffi-
cult to draw a definite conclusion about this mode, but a
broad negative tendency between As concentration and pH
(Fig. 3) is not consistent with this desorption mode.
Thus, at present, the first model seems to be plausible.
However, there are several uncertain points which we must
consider:
(1) The negative correlation between As and Mn concentra-
tions in contrast to the positive correlation between As and Fe
concentrations (Fig. 3) despite similar dissolution nature of
both Mn and Fe oxides in reducing conditions, seems to be cu-
rious. This is related to the negative correlation between Fe
and Mn concentrations (Fig. 5). These observations might be
attributed to the difference in the boundary positions of Fe2+
and Mn2+ on the Eh-pH regime (e.g., Brookins, 1988), that is,
manganese can be dissolved under mildly reducing conditions.
However, details of geological and hydrological views should
Fig. 4 Plots for Na vs Cl and Br vs Cl. The dashed line in (A) indicates Cl/Na ratio of 1.8, corresponding to the seawater value (Turekian, 1968). The dashed line in (B) indicates Cl/Br ratio of 288, corresponding the seawater value (Turekian, 1968). The symbols are the same as those in Fig. 2.
- 6 -
condition mainly due to break down of organic matter. The groundwater which belongs to this type is characterized by high iron and bicarbonate concentrations, while nitrate and sulfate are absent. (2) Desorption of As from iron oxides or other minerals under elevated pH condition, which can explain alkali-oxic waters. (3) Decomposition of iron sulfide minerals which contain As via oxidation. Pyrite and arsenopyrite are well known As containing minerals. (4) As release from geothermal fluids such as hot spring waters.
The forth mechanism is not adequate for the Bangladesh groundwaters, because geothermal activity is not common in Bangladesh. Two hot springs are known, Boga lake and Sitakunda, but both areas are incompatible with the high As areas of the spatial distribution map such as shown in Fig. 1B. Moreover, the features of Sitakunda hot spring, for example, are much lower grade than typical hot spring ones, and therefore its effect must be limited: the temperature is rather low (26.1 to 29.8 ºC during winter) and the total alkalinity and chlorine content
range from 12 to 20 mg/L and 13.9 to 18.3 mg/L, respectively (Hossain and Anwar, 2009). As a whole, it can be said that the mutual relationships among various concentration data obtained in the present study are similar to those reported by the previous investigators (e.g., McArthur et al., 2004). Therefore, on the basis of the summary of Ravenscroft at al., (2009), the first model (reductive dissolution) seems to be plausible. The fundamental reaction of the first model can be represented by the following redox reaction which has been examined by many investigators (e.g., Hem, 1977; Langmuir, 1997): 8 FeOOH + CH3COOH + 14 H2CO3 ⇒ 8 Fe2+ + 16 HCO3− + 12 H2O Combining this reaction to another fundamental fact that As and P are tend to be involved in Fe hydroxides (e.g., Williams et al., 1976; Antelo et al., 2005; Violante et al., 2009), the correlations among Fe, As, P and HCO3− concentrations can be interpreted by dissolution of Fe hydroxides which contain As and P. In this relation, the third model (sulfide oxidation model) in which the opposite redox condition is assumed does not meet the observed data. The second desorption model seems to be unclear in literatures. For example, adsorption of arsenate onto most oxides and clays decreases significantly at pH>8.0, but there tends to be a peak in the region of pH 6 to 8 for Al oxide and Al-rich clays (Ravenscroft et al., 2009). Moreover, the
Br (ppm)0.0 0.5 1.0
Cl (ppm)
0
100
200 Seawater Cl/Br
Na (ppm)0 100 200
Cl (ppm)
0
100
200
Seawater Cl/Na
A
B
Fig. 4 Plots for Na vs Cl and Br vs Cl. The dashed line in (A) indicates Cl/Na ratio of 1.8, corresponding to the seawater value (Turekian, 1968). The dashed line in (B) indicates Cl/Br ratio of 288, corresponding the seawater value (Turekian, 1968). The symbols are the same as those in Fig. 2.
Mn (ppm)0.0 0.5 1.0 3.5
Fe (ppm)
0
5
10
15
P (ppm)0 1 2
Fe (ppm)
0
5
10
15
A
B
Fig. 5 Relationship between Fe and Mn or P.
Fig. 5 Relationship between Fe and Mn or P.
- 6 -
condition mainly due to break down of organic matter. The groundwater which belongs to this type is characterized by high iron and bicarbonate concentrations, while nitrate and sulfate are absent. (2) Desorption of As from iron oxides or other minerals under elevated pH condition, which can explain alkali-oxic waters. (3) Decomposition of iron sulfide minerals which contain As via oxidation. Pyrite and arsenopyrite are well known As containing minerals. (4) As release from geothermal fluids such as hot spring waters.
The forth mechanism is not adequate for the Bangladesh groundwaters, because geothermal activity is not common in Bangladesh. Two hot springs are known, Boga lake and Sitakunda, but both areas are incompatible with the high As areas of the spatial distribution map such as shown in Fig. 1B. Moreover, the features of Sitakunda hot spring, for example, are much lower grade than typical hot spring ones, and therefore its effect must be limited: the temperature is rather low (26.1 to 29.8 ºC during winter) and the total alkalinity and chlorine content
range from 12 to 20 mg/L and 13.9 to 18.3 mg/L, respectively (Hossain and Anwar, 2009). As a whole, it can be said that the mutual relationships among various concentration data obtained in the present study are similar to those reported by the previous investigators (e.g., McArthur et al., 2004). Therefore, on the basis of the summary of Ravenscroft at al., (2009), the first model (reductive dissolution) seems to be plausible. The fundamental reaction of the first model can be represented by the following redox reaction which has been examined by many investigators (e.g., Hem, 1977; Langmuir, 1997): 8 FeOOH + CH3COOH + 14 H2CO3 ⇒ 8 Fe2+ + 16 HCO3− + 12 H2O Combining this reaction to another fundamental fact that As and P are tend to be involved in Fe hydroxides (e.g., Williams et al., 1976; Antelo et al., 2005; Violante et al., 2009), the correlations among Fe, As, P and HCO3− concentrations can be interpreted by dissolution of Fe hydroxides which contain As and P. In this relation, the third model (sulfide oxidation model) in which the opposite redox condition is assumed does not meet the observed data. The second desorption model seems to be unclear in literatures. For example, adsorption of arsenate onto most oxides and clays decreases significantly at pH>8.0, but there tends to be a peak in the region of pH 6 to 8 for Al oxide and Al-rich clays (Ravenscroft et al., 2009). Moreover, the
Br (ppm)0.0 0.5 1.0
Cl (ppm)
0
100
200 Seawater Cl/Br
Na (ppm)0 100 200
Cl (ppm)
0
100
200
Seawater Cl/Na
A
B
Fig. 4 Plots for Na vs Cl and Br vs Cl. The dashed line in (A) indicates Cl/Na ratio of 1.8, corresponding to the seawater value (Turekian, 1968). The dashed line in (B) indicates Cl/Br ratio of 288, corresponding the seawater value (Turekian, 1968). The symbols are the same as those in Fig. 2.
Mn (ppm)0.0 0.5 1.0 3.5
Fe (ppm)
0
5
10
15
P (ppm)0 1 2
Fe (ppm)
0
5
10
15
A
B
Fig. 5 Relationship between Fe and Mn or P.
(79)
- -79
be examined further combining with NO3- and SO4
2- behaviors.
(2) There are some samples having high Na and Cl concentra-
tions, which suggests involvement of seawater for the genesis
of these graoundwaters. However, the data points deviate
from the seawater lines in the Na-Cl and Br-Cl diagrams (Fig.
5). Such tendencies have not been well examined for the Bang-
ladesh groundwaters, but close scrutiny may provide useful
information about the genetic models (c.f., Alcalá and Custo-
dio, 2008).
(3) In addition to the some common components studied here
as well as in other investigations, some trace elements such as
rare earth elements (REE) are interesting. It has been pointed
out that Eu and Ce anomalies in water samples may reflect
redox states of their genetic processes (e.g., Otsuka and Ter-
akado, 2003; Johannesson et al., 2005). However, data of REE
abundances for the groundwaters from Bangladesh are sparse
(c.f., Bibi et al., 2006). The data of this preliminary report
should be important for screening the samples for further de-
velopment of the trace element studies.
5. Acknowledgements
We thank the Center for Environmental Management of
Kobe University for allowing us to use the atomic absorption
spectrophotometer. We also thank Dr. K. Okushi for checking
the manuscript.
6. References
Alcalá, F. J. and Custodio, E. (2008) Using the Cl/Br ratio as
a tracer to identify the origin of salinity in aquifers in
Spain and Portugal. J. Hydrology, 359, 189-207.
Antelo, J., Avena, M., Fiol, S., Lopez, R. and Arce, F. (2005)
Effects of pH and ionic strength on the adsorption of phos-
phate and arsenate at the goethite-water interface. J.
Colloid Inteface Sci., 285, 476-486.
BGS/DPHE (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in
Bangladesh. Eds: Kinniburgh, D. G. and Smedley, P. L.,
British Geological Survey Technical Report, WC/00/19.
Vol. 1 (Summary) 15 p. and Vol 2 (Final report) 267 p.
Bibi, M. H., Ahmed, F. and Ishiga, H. (2006) Distribution of
arsenic and other trace elements in the Holocene sediments
of the Meghna River Delta, Bangladesh. Environ. Geol.,
50, 1243-1253.
Brookins, D. G. (1988) Eh-pH diagrams for geochemistry. 176
p. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Dhar, R. K., Biswas, B. K., Samanta, G., Mandal,B. K.,
Chakraborti, D., Roy, S., Jafar, A., Islam, A., Ara, G.,
Kabir, S., Khan, A. W., Ahmed, S. K. and Hadi, S. A.
(1997) Groundwater arsenic calamity in Bangladesh. Cur-
rent Science, 73, 48-59.
Hem, J. D. (1977) Reactions of metal ions at surface of hy-
drous iron oxides. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 41, 527-
538.
Hossain, M. Z. and Anwar, M. N. (2009) Characterization of
Microorganisms from Sitakunda hot spring. The Chit-
tagong Univ. J. B. Sci., 4, 107-117.
Itai, T. (2011) A review of the field and experimental studies
aimed to clarify the formation mechanism of naturally
occurring As contaminated groundwater in Bengal Basin:
Current understanding and future issues (in Japanese).
Chikyukagaku, 45, 61-97.
Johannesson, K. H. (ed.) (2005) Rare earth elements in
groundwater flow systems. 293 p. Springer, Dordrecht,
Netherlands.
Langmuir, D. (1997) Aqueous environmental geochemistry.
600p. Printice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
McArthura, J.M, Banerjeeb, D.M., Hudson-Edwardsc, K.A.,
Mishrab, R., Purohitb, R., Ravenscroftd, P., Cronine, A.,
Howartha, R..J., Chatterjeef, A., Talukderf, T., Lowryg,
D ., Houghtona, S. and Chadhah, D.K. (2004) Natural or-
ganic matter in sedimentary basins and its relation to ar-
senic in anoxic ground water: the example of West Bengal
and its worldwide implications. Applied Geochemistry,
19, 1255-1293.
Nickson, R. T., McArthur, J. M., Ravenscroft, P., Burgess, W.
G. and Ahmed, K. M. (2000) Mechanism of arsenic re-
lease to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Ap-
plied Geochem., 15, 403-413.
Otsuka, M. and Terakado, Y. (2003) Rare earth element abun-
dances in high phosphorous and low iron groundwaters
from the Nishinomiya district, Japan: Variations in Ce
anomaly, redox state and heavy rare earth enrichment.
Geochem. J., 38, 393-395.
Ravenscroft, P, Brammer, H. and Richards, K. S. (2009) Ar-
senic pollution: a global synthesis. 617 p. Blackwell-
Wiley.
Saha, K. C. (1995)Chronic arsenic dermatoses from tube-well
water in West Bengal during 1983-87. Indian J. Derma-
tology, 40, 1-12.
Saha, A. K. and Chakrabarti, C. (1995) Geological and geo-
chemical background of the As bearing groundwater oc-
currences of West Bengal. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Arsenic
in Groundwater: Cause, Effect and Remedy. Calcutta, In-
dia. Abstr. p. 42.
Smedley, P. L. and Kinniburgh, D. G. (2001) A review of the
source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural
waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 517-568.
Takagi, T., Oguchi, T., Zaiki, M. and Matsumoto, J. (2005)
Geomorphological and geological studies for Bangla-
desh:A Review (in Japanese). Transactions Japanese
Geomorphological Union, 26, 405-422
(80)
- -80
Turekian, K. K. (1968) Ocean. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jer-
sey.
Smith, A. H., Lingas, E. O. and Rahman, M. (2000) Contami-
nation of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a pub-
lic health emergency. Bulletin of the World Health Or-
ganization, 78, 1093-1103.
Violante, A., Pigna, M., Del Gaudio, S., Cozzolion, V. and Ba-
nerjee, D. (2009) Coprecipitation of arsenic with metal
oxides. 3. Nature, mineralogy, and reactivity of iron (III)-
aluminum precipitate. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1515-
1521.
WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality - 4th ed.
541pp, World Health Organization. Switzerland.
Williams, J. D. H., Jaquet, J-M. and Thomas, R. L. (1976)
Forms of phosphorus in the surficial sediments of Lake
Erie. J. Fisheries Res. Board Canada, 33, 413-429.
Younger, P. L. Groundwater in the Environment: an Intro-
duction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, (2007).