63
INTRODUCTION INTO FINITE INTRODUCTION INTO FINITE ELEMENT NONLINEAR ELEMENT NONLINEAR ANALYSES ANALYSES Doc. Ing. Vladimír Ivančo, PhD. Technical University of Košice Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics HS Wismar, June 2009

Lect Wismar 2009

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Nonlinear analysis finite element method

Citation preview

Page 1: Lect Wismar 2009

INTRODUCTION INTO FINITE INTRODUCTION INTO FINITE ELEMENT NONLINEAR ELEMENT NONLINEAR

ANALYSESANALYSESDoc. Ing. Vladimír Ivančo, PhD.Technical University of Košice

Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics

HS Wismar, June 2009

Page 2: Lect Wismar 2009

2

CONTENS1. Introduction

1.1 Types of structural nonlinearities

1.2 Concept of time curves

2. Geometrically nonlinear finite element analysis

3. Incremental – iterative solution

3.1 Incremental method

3.2 Iterative methods

4. Material nonlinearities

5. Examples

Page 3: Lect Wismar 2009

3

Linear static analysis - the most common and the most simplified analysis of structures is based on assumptions:

• static = loading is so slow that dynamic effects can be neglected

• linear = a) material obeys Hooke’s lawb) external forces are conservative

c) supports remain unchanged during loadingd) deformations are so small that change of the structure configuration is neglectable

1. Introduction 1.1 Sources of nonlinearities

Page 4: Lect Wismar 2009

4

Consequences:• displacements and stresses are proportional to loads, principle of superposition holds

• in FEM we obtain a set of linear algebraic equations for computation of displacements

FdK where

K – global stiffness matrix

d – vector of unknown nodal displacements

F – vector of external nodal forces

Page 5: Lect Wismar 2009

5

1. Geometric nonlinearities - changes of the structure shape (or configuration changes) cannot be neglected and its deformed configuration should be considered.

2. Material nonlinearities - material behaves nonlinearly and linear Hooke’s law cannot be used. More complicated material models should be then used instead e.g.

Nonlinear analysis – sources of nonlinearities can be classified as

nonlinear elastic (Mooney-Rivlin’s model for materials like rubber), elastoplastic (Huber-von Mises for metals, Drucker-Prager model to simulate the behaviour of granular soil materials such as sand and gravel) etc.

3. Boundary nonlinearities - displacement dependent boundary conditions. The most frequent boundary nonlinearities are encountered in contact problems.

Page 6: Lect Wismar 2009

6

FdK FdR )(we obtain a set of nonlinear algebraic equations

Consequences of assuming nonlinearities in FEM:

Instead of set of linear algebraic equations

Consequences of nonlinear structural behaviour that have to be recognized are:

1. The principle of superposition cannot be applied. For example, the results of several load cases

cannot be combined. Results of the nonlinear analysis cannot be scaled.

Page 7: Lect Wismar 2009

7

2. Only one load case can be handled at a time.

3. The sequence of application of loads (loading history) may be important. Especially, plastic deformations depend on a manner of loading. This is a reason for dividing loads into small increments in nonlinear FE analysis.

4. The structural behaviour can be markedly non-proportional to the applied load. The initial state of stress (e.g. residual stresses from heat treatment, welding etc.) may be important.

Page 8: Lect Wismar 2009

8

1.2 Concept of time curvesIn order to reflect history of loading, loads are associated with time curves.

Example - values of forces at any time are defined as

111 ftF 222 ftF

where f1 and f2 are nominal (input) values of forces and 1 and 1 are load parameters that are functions of time t.

Page 9: Lect Wismar 2009

9

For nonlinear static analysis, the “time” variable represents a pseudo time, which denotes the intensity of the applied loads at certain step.

For nonlinear dynamic analysis and nonlinear static analysis with time-dependent material properties the “time” represents the real time associated with the loads’ application.

The most common case – all loads are proportional to time:

Page 10: Lect Wismar 2009

10

2. Geometrically nonlinear finite element analysisExample – linearly elastic truss

0sin PN

.0 PL

uhN

Luh

sin

0, yiF

0, yiF

Page 11: Lect Wismar 2009

11

Condition of equilibrium

.0 PL

uhN

0AEN

0

0

LLL

220 haL 22 )( uhaL

where

engineering strain

axial force

0A cross-section of the truss

Initial and current length of the truss are

Page 12: Lect Wismar 2009

12

To avoid complications, it is convenient to introduce new measure of strain – Green’s strain defined as

20

20

2

2 LLL

G

2220 haL 222 )( uhaL

In our example is

hence

2

00020

22222

21

22

Lu

Lu

Lh

Lhauhuha

G

Page 13: Lect Wismar 2009

13

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6

Dl / l 0

stra

inGreen's strainLogarithmic strainEngineering strain

Example of different strain measures

)1ln()ln(0

log

LL

Logarithmic strain (true strain)

Page 14: Lect Wismar 2009

14

The stress-strain relation was measured as

EAN

0

When using Green’s strain the relation should be

GGGG

EEE

211

21 2

GG EE

*

211

211

*

EE

This means that constitutive equation should be

Page 15: Lect Wismar 2009

15

If strain is small (e.g. less than 2%) differences are negligible

211

*

EE

The new modulus of elasticity is not constant but it depends on strain

DL / L0 G (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) G(MPa)

0,0000 0,0000 0,000000 21 000 21 000 0 0

0,0050 0,0050 0,005013 21 000 20 948 105 105

0,0100 0,0100 0,010050 21 000 20 896 210 210

0,0150 0,0150 0,015113 21 000 20 844 315 315

0,0200 0,0200 0,020200 21 000 20 792 420 420

Page 16: Lect Wismar 2009

16

Assuming that strain is small, we can write

GG AEAEAEN 00*

0 and after substituting into equation

we can derive the condition of equilibrium in the form

.0 PL

uhN

PuhuhuLAE

22330

0 232

Page 17: Lect Wismar 2009

17

Consequence of considering configuration changes - relation between load P and displacement u is nonlinear

PuhuhuLAE

22330

0 232

Generally, using FEM we obtain a set of nonlinear algebraic equations for unknown nodal displacements d

FdR )(

Page 18: Lect Wismar 2009

18

is tangent stiffness matrix

FdR )(

3. Incremental – iterative solutionAssumption of large displacements leads to nonlinear equation of equilibrium

dKdRddRdRddR d)(d)()d( T

FFddR d)d(

dRK

T

FdK dd T

For infinitesimal increments of internal and external forces we can write

where

Page 19: Lect Wismar 2009

19

3.1 Incremental methodThe load is divided into a set of small increments DFi .

Increments of displacements are calculated from the set of linear simultaneous equations

iiiT FdK DD )1(

iii ddd D 1

Nodal displacements after force increment of DFi are

where KT(i-1) is tangent stiffness matrix computed form displacements d(i-1) obtained in previous incremental step.

Page 20: Lect Wismar 2009

20

Incremental method

Page 21: Lect Wismar 2009

21

3.2 Iterative methodsNewton-Raphson methodConsider that di is estimation of nodal displacement. As it is only an estimation, the condition of equilibrium would not be satisfied

This means that conditions of equilibrium of internal and external nodal forces are not satisfied and in nodes are unbalanced forces

FdR )( i

FdRr )( ii

Page 22: Lect Wismar 2009

22

Correction of nodal displacements can be then obtained from the set of linear algebraic equations

iiiT rdK D)(

and mew, corrected estimation of nodal displacements is

iii ddd D1

The procedure is repeated until the sufficiently accurate solution is obtained.

The first estimation is obtained from linear analysis

FKd 1

Page 23: Lect Wismar 2009

23

Standard Newton-Raphson (NR) method

Page 24: Lect Wismar 2009

24

Modified Newton-Raphson (MNR) method - the same stiffness matrix is used in all iterations

Page 25: Lect Wismar 2009

25

Combination of Newton-Raphson and incremental methods

Page 26: Lect Wismar 2009

26

4. Material nonlinearities 4.1 Nonlinear elasticity models

For any nonlinear elastic material model, it is possible to define relation between stress and strain increments as

εDσ dd T

Matrix DT is function of strains . Consequently, a set of equilibrium equations we receive in FEM is nonlinear and must be solved by use of any method described above

Page 27: Lect Wismar 2009

27

4.1 Elastoplastic material models

The total strains are decomposed into elastic and plastic parts

pe εεε

σε

Qp dd

The yield criterion says whether plastic deformation will occur.The plastic behaviour of a material after onset of plastic deformations is defined by so-called flow rule in which is the rate and the direction of plastic strains is related to the stress state and the stress rate. This relation can be expressed as

Page 28: Lect Wismar 2009

28

Constitutive equation can be formulated as

εDσ dd TThe tangential material matrix DT is used to form a tangential stiffness matrix KT. When the tangential stiffness matrix is defined, the displacement increment is obtained for a known load increment

FdK DDT

As load and displacement increments are final, not infinitesimal, displacements obtained by solution of this set of linear algebraic equation will be approximate only. That means, conditions of equilibrium of internal and external nodal forces will not be satisfied and iterative process is necessary.

Page 29: Lect Wismar 2009

29

The problem - not only equilibrium equations but also constitutive equations of material must be satisfied. That means that within the each equilibrium iteration step check of stress state and iterations to find elastic and plastic part of strains at every integration point must be included. The iteration process continues until both, equilibrium conditions and constitutive equations are satisfied simultaneously. The converged solution at the end of load increment is then used at the start of new load increment.

Page 30: Lect Wismar 2009

30

Page 31: Lect Wismar 2009

31

Example of non-linear static analysis – bending of the beam,

considering elastoplastic material

bilinear material model

Page 32: Lect Wismar 2009

32

Detail of finite element mesh – SHELL4T elements are colored according to their thickness

Page 33: Lect Wismar 2009

33

Beginning of plastic deformations

Normal stress distribution in the cross-section at mid of the beam span.

Maximal stress x approaches value of the yield stress

Page 34: Lect Wismar 2009

34

Normal stress distribution after increase of the load.

Page 35: Lect Wismar 2009

35

COLLAPSE – inability of the beam to resist further load increase

Page 36: Lect Wismar 2009

36

Page 37: Lect Wismar 2009

37

Page 38: Lect Wismar 2009

38

Deflection versus load

Page 39: Lect Wismar 2009

39

Example of nonlinear dynamic analysis - drop test of container for radioactive waste.Simulation of a drop from 9 m at an angle to steel target

Page 40: Lect Wismar 2009

40

Reduced stresses at time 0,00187 s

Time courses of reduced stresses at selected nodes

Page 41: Lect Wismar 2009

41

Drop on side of the lid – check of screwed bolts

Page 42: Lect Wismar 2009

42

0,00165 s.

0,0027 s

Page 43: Lect Wismar 2009

43Maximal displacements

Page 44: Lect Wismar 2009

44

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

time step

[ M

Pa]

Bolt 1

Bolt 2

Bolt 3

Bolt 4

Page 45: Lect Wismar 2009

45

Drop along the top on the mandrel

Page 46: Lect Wismar 2009

46

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0

t [ms]

[M

Pa]

Drop along the top on the mandrel - time course of maximal stress in the lid

Page 47: Lect Wismar 2009

47

Drop aside on the mandrel

Page 48: Lect Wismar 2009

48

Reduced stresses at time 0,00235 s

Page 49: Lect Wismar 2009

49

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0

t [ms]

[M

Pa]

Page 50: Lect Wismar 2009

50

Study of influence of residual stresses due to arc welding on load-bearing capacity of a thin-walled beam.

Example:

Page 51: Lect Wismar 2009

51

Coupled thermal and stress analysis in following steps:

1.Nonlinear transient thermal analysis

• temperature dependent thermal material properties c, k and density

• temperature dependent convective heat transfer coefficient

2.Nonlinear stress analysis

• plastic deformations

• large displacements

• temperature dependent material mechanical properties

Page 52: Lect Wismar 2009

52

Temperature field at time t = 5 s, 1st phase of welding

Page 53: Lect Wismar 2009

53

Temperature field at time t = 10 s, 1st phase

Page 54: Lect Wismar 2009

54

Temperature field at time t = 5 s, 2nd phase

Page 55: Lect Wismar 2009

55

Temperature field at time t = 10 s, 2nd phase

Page 56: Lect Wismar 2009

56

Temperature field after end of welding

Page 57: Lect Wismar 2009

57

Reduction coefficients for yield stress and modulus of elasticity

yfy fTkTy

)()(

20)()( ETkTE E

fy – yield stress and E20 modulus of elasticity at 20 oC

Page 58: Lect Wismar 2009

58

temperature field

stress field

Page 59: Lect Wismar 2009

59

Page 60: Lect Wismar 2009

60

Page 61: Lect Wismar 2009

61

Page 62: Lect Wismar 2009

62

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

t (s)

v (m

m)

Deflection of the beam during welding

Page 63: Lect Wismar 2009

63

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

5

0 5 10 15 20 25

F (kN)

v (m

m)

bez reziduálnych napätí(žíhaný)nežíhanýunannealedannealed

Maximum deflection versus load

F