Upload
li-liu
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tailoring the beta transition in epoxy resins: Anhydride
cured alternativesLi Liu
Supervisor: Dr Joel Foreman
Contents• Background and Aim• Literature review• Experimental procedure• Results and Discussion• Conclusions• Future work• Acknowledgement
Background and AimEpoxy resin: Epoxy group Popular material Good properties BrittlePhase transition: Crankshaft model[1]
Properties
[1] Perkin Elmer, “Dynamic Mechanical Analysis Basics : Part 2 Thermoplastic Transitions 46 and Properties,” Dma, pp. 1–6, 2007.
DGEBA
Background and AimEpoxy resin: Popular material High Young’s modulus Low shrinkage BrittlePhase transition: Properties Crankshaft model[1]
Molecule motion
[1] Perkin Elmer, “Dynamic Mechanical Analysis Basics : Part 2 Thermoplastic Transitions 46 and Properties,” Dma, pp. 1–6, 2007.
Background and AimAim:
Investigate the cause of beta transition of epoxy resin by changing different combination of epoxy resin and curing agent
Discuss glass transition to analyze determine beta transition
Literature reviewGlass transition[1]: Stiff chemical structure of moleculeCrosslinks
Beta transition:Phenyl ring[2]
Glycidyl ether segment[3]
Combination of flipping phenyl ring and glycidyl ether segment[4]
[1] J. M. G. Cowie and V. Arrighi, “Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of Modern Materials,” in Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of Modern Materials, 2007, p. 463.[2] M. Ochi, H. Iesako, and M. Shimbo, “Mechanical relaxation mechanism of epoxide resins cured with diamines,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 457–461, 1985.[3] J. G. Williams and O. Delatycki, “Transitions of the hydrogen bond in epoxy–diamine networks,” J. Polym. Sci. Part A-2, vol. 8, pp. 295–304, 1970.[4] W. JOHN G, “the Beta Relaxation in Epoxy Resin-Based Networks
Experimental procedureResins: • Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA)• Triglycidyl p-amino phenol (p-TGAP)• Triglycidyl m-amino phenol (m-TGAP)Hardeners:• 4,4’-disamino-diphenylsulphone (4,4’-DDS)• Methyl anhydride (NMA or MNA)Initiator:• Benzyl dimethyl amine (BDMA)Experimental method:• Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)• Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
m-TGAP
P-TGAP
DGEBA
Experimental procedureResins: • Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA)• Triglycidyl p-amino phenol (p-TGAP)• Triglycidyl m-amino phenol (m-TGAP)Hardeners:• 4,4’-disamino-diphenylsulphone (4,4’-DDS)• Methyl anhydride (NMA or MNA)Initiator:• Benzyl dimethyl amine (BDMA)Experimental method:• Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)• Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
4,4’-DDS
NMA or MNA
BDMA
Experimental procedureResins: • Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA)• Triglycidyl p-amino phenol (p-TGAP)• Triglycidyl m-amino phenol (m-TGAP)Hardeners:• 4,4’-disamino-diphenylsulphone (4,4’-DDS)• Methyl anhydride (NMA or MNA)Initiator:• Benzyl dimethyl amine (BDMA)Experimental method:• Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)• Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) PerkinElmer DMA 8000
PerkinElmer DSC 8500
Experimental procedureResins: • Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA)• Triglycidyl p-amino phenol (p-TGAP)• Triglycidyl m-amino phenol (m-TGAP)Hardeners:• 4,4’-disamino-diphenylsulphone (4,4’-DDS)• Methyl anhydride (NMA or MNA)Initiator:• Benzyl dimethyl amine (BDMA)Experimental method:• Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)• Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
Beta and glass transition in DMA results
-150.0 -50.0 50.0 150.0 250.00.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Temperature
Tan
delta
glass
β
Results and DiscussionAppearance: DGEBA system appear
yellow
TGAP system appear orange or red
4,4’-DDS system appear darker than NMA system
With increasing percentage of epoxy resin, colour become lighter
DGEBA TGAP m-TGAP
4,4’- DDS
NMA BDMA
(50:90:1)
NMA BDMA
(75:90:1)
NMA BDMA
(100:90:1)
Appearance of samples
Results and DiscussionDSC: For main five samples, all curing degree are above 90% which means the samples
are cured
For the discussion of beta transition, the effects of glycidyl ether segments could be ignored
DGEBA/ 4’4DDS
DGEBA/ NMA/BDMA
TGAP/ 4’4DDS
p-TGAP/ NMA/BDMA
m-TGAP/ 4’4DDS
Degree of cure/%
97.81 92.02 97.10 95.10 99.57
Results and DiscussionDMA for samples which show full glass transition: With increasing frequency, the temperature of glass transition increases With increasing frequency, the temperature of beta transition ascends Higher temperature could provide more energy to support high-frequency
motivation
-150.0 -50.0 50.0 150.0 250.00.00.20.40.60.81.0
Tan Delta1. Tan Delta5. Tan Delta10.Tan Delta50.
Temperature
Tan
delta
-150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.00.01
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
Tan Delta1. Tan Delta5. Tan Delta10.Tan Delta50.
Temperature
Tan
delta
DMA results of DGEBA/4,4’-DDS Beta transition of DGEBA/4,4’-DDS
Results and DiscussionDMA for samples which show full glass transition: With increasing frequency, the temperature of glass transition increases With increasing frequency, the temperature of beta transition ascends Higher temperature could provide more energy to support high-frequency
motivation
Glass temperature of main samples Beta temperature of main samples
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4150170190210230250270290
DGEBA/4,4'-DDS DGEBA/NMA p-TGAP/4,4'-DDSp-TGAP/NMA m-TGAP/4,4'-DDS
Ln frequency (Hz)
Tem
pera
ture
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
-75
-55
-35
-15
DGEBA/4,4'-DDS DGEBA/NMA p-TGAP/4,4'-DDSp-TGAP/NMA m-TGAP/4,4'-DDS
Ln frequency (Hz)
Tem
pera
ture
Results and DiscussionDMA results comparison for main samples: 4,4’-DDS systems and TGAP systems have higher glass temperature than NMA
systems and DGEBA systems p-TGAP systems has higher glass temperature than m-TGAP
-160.0 -60.0 40.0 140.0 240.00.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4
DGEBA 44DDS p-TGAP NMA (50:90:1) DGEBA NMAp-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP NMA (50:90:1)
Temperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of main samples
4,4’-DDS has two phenyl rings which lead to stiffer chemical structure and results in higher glass transitionTGAP has three functional groups which lead to more crosslinks and results in higher glass transitionThe chemical structure of m-TGAP leads to less crosslinks in post-cured process which result in lower glass transition
Results and DiscussionDMA results comparison for main samples: 4,4’-DDS system has larger beta transition than NMA system p-TGAP system has larger beta transition than m-TGAP
-160.0 -110.0 -60.0 -10.0 40.00.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
DGEBA 44DDS p-TGAP NMA (50:90:1) DGEBA NMAp-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP NMA (50:90:1)
Temperature
Tan de
lta
Beta transition of main samples
Two phenyl rings in 4,4’-DDS leads to larger beta transitionThe chemical structure of m-TGAP hinder the effect of phenyl ringThe influence of anhydride is still unknown
Results and DiscussionDMA results comparison for different ratio: With increasing proportion of epoxy resin, temperature of glass transition decreases There is no rule about different ratio and beta transitionThe samples of 75:90:1 and 100:90:1 may be not curedThe excess of epoxy resin may hinder crosslinking
-200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
50:90:1 75:90:1 100:90:1
Temperature
Tan
delta
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.00.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
50:90:1 75:90:1 100:90:1Temperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of different ratio sample Beta transition of different ratio sample
Results and DiscussionDMA results comparison for different further post cure: With increasing time of further post cure, glass temperature ascend No regularity about beta transition and further post-cured timeFurther post curing result in more crosslinks which could increase glass temperatureThe samples are not homogeneous
-200 -100 0 100 200 3000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
no further post cure further post cure 2 hrsfurther post cure 4 hrs
Temperature
Tan
delta
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.00.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
no further post cure further post cure 2 hrsfurther post cure 4 hrs
Temperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of different time of post cure Beta transition of different time of post cure
Results and DiscussionDMA results comparison for rescanning: After rescanning, temperature of glass transition increase After rescanning, area of beta transition decreaseRescanning provide high temperature for sample to post cureThe samples were oxidized when they were scanned
-150.0 -50.0 50.0 150.0 250.00.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8
scan rescan
Tan
delta
Glass transition of p-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
-150.0 -50.0 50.0 150.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
scan rescan
Temperature
Glass transition of p-TGAP/NMA (75:90:1)
-150.0 -50.0 50.0 150.0 250.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
scan rescan
Glass transition of m-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
Results and DiscussionDMA results comparison for rescanning: After rescanning, temperature of glass transition increase After rescanning, area of beta transition decreaseRescanning provide high temperature for sample to post cureMore crosslinks may hinder the motivation of small molecules which result in
smaller be transition
-200.0 -100.0 0.00.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
scan rescan
Tan
delta
-200.0 -100.0 0.00.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
scan rescan
Temperature-200.0 -100.0 0.0
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
scan rescan
Beta transition of p-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1) Beta transition of p-TGAP/NMA (75:90:1) Beta transition of m-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
Conclusion
• Stiffer chemical structure and more crosslinks lead to higher temperature of glass transition
• Phenyl rings in chemical structure contribute to beta transition
Future work
• Determine the correct ratio and curing process of TGAP/NMA/BDMA systems
• Change one factor when determine the effect of anhydride (for example: choose an anhydride hardener which has two phenyl ring or an amine-hardener which has no phenyl ring)
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr Joel Foreman, for his guidance, encouragements, and patience throughout the project and presentation.
I would also like to thank Roderick Ramsdale-Capper and Ben Holmes, for their help throughout the project and the training for casting epoxy resins, DMA scanning and DSC. And the useful advice on presentation from Olga Amariutei.
In addition, I would like to appreciate the help of all staffs in the lab.
Thank you for listeningAny questions?
-150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.00.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
Temperature
Tan
delta
glass
β
Beta and glass transition in DMA results
Phase transition
Molecule motion
DGEBA TGAP m-TGAP
4,4’-DDS
NMA BDMA
(50:90:1)
NMA BDMA
(75:90:1)
NMA BDMA
(100:90:1)
Appearance of samples
-150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Tan Delta1. Tan Delta5. Tan Delta10. Tan Delta50.Temperature
Tan
delta
DMA results of DGEBA/4,4’-DDS
-150.0 -130.0 -110.0 -90.0 -70.0 -50.0 -30.0 -10.0 10.0 30.0 50.00.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Tan Delta1. Tan Delta5. Tan Delta10. Tan Delta50.Temperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of DGEBA/4,4’-DDS
Glass temperature of main samples
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
DGEBA/4,4'-DDS DGEBA/NMA p-TGAP/4,4'-DDS p-TGAP/NMAm-TGAP/4,4'-DDS
Ln frequency (Hz)
Tem
pera
ture
Beta temperature of main samples
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4-85
-75
-65
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
DGEBA/4,4'-DDS DGEBA/NMA p-TGAP/4,4'-DDS p-TGAP/NMAm-TGAP/4,4'-DDS
Ln frequency (Hz)
Tem
pera
ture
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.00.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
50:90:1 75:90:1 100:90:1Temperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of different ratio sample
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.00.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
50:90:1 75:90:1 100:90:1Temperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of different ratio sample
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
no further post cure further post cure 2 hrs further post cure 4 hrs
Temperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of different time of post cure
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.00.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
no further post cure further post cure 2 hrs further post cure 4 hrsTemperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of different time of post cure
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.00.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
scan rescanTemperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of p-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.00.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
scan rescanTemperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of p-TGAP/NMA (75:90:1)
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.00.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
scan rescanTemperature
Tan
delta
Glass transition of m-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.0
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
scan rescanTemperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of p-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.00.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
scan rescanTemperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of p-TGAP/NMA (75:90:1)
-200.0 -150.0 -100.0 -50.0 0.00.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
scan rescanTemperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of m-TGAP/NMA (50:90:1)
Glass transition of main samples
-160.0 -110.0 -60.0 -10.0 40.0 90.0 140.0 190.0 240.0 290.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
DGEBA 44DDS p-TGAP NMA (50:90:1) DGEBA NMAp-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP NMA (50:90:1)
Temperature
Tan
delta
Beta transition of main samples
-160.0 -110.0 -60.0 -10.0 40.00.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
DGEBA 44DDS p-TGAP NMA (50:90:1) DGEBA NMAp-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP 44DDS m-TGAP NMA (50:90:1)
Temperature
Tan
delta