Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
(034) :JgL.uJ o!.ll.oJlCi.u:ll:;l+96611 467 44 47 ..Ail&-966 1146742 53 ..,u5L9
ti.,!:J~I~J.LII~111451",,~J.l12455 W.,p
www.ksu.edu.sa
ci.......s2.... ~ ".:lQS2.uI dJ..oJ IKing Saud University
nlrll~ru~ ..
,. L..o:i'll ,.l.....iJ ,.~j.tt ;;.,..'1 t ;;~Ia.M
,.L..o:i'lt u~.J u~j.tl ul.,..'11 ;;~1a.M
I~.J III ~~..H.J .JJt ~.JJ jO'J'e ,.~tl.7'-"4J1 rL..1J 0-'~13 L.....oWId; ,'?':" !1L,l\U ' '70).;--:9 ~:~
U\.L, 3 [~ ~ ~ I~ I 0La" (~..)-") .A' l.r•.../AI , l. t:-'...J t:;,. ,..Iy;..ll .A' l.n/,H A
wl.,JLbJ I/ ,-;-,).lb1J l:~ 1~ t..9~ ~ J.:->- jj '-:!Ji ~ ,..I~ 13j-J~ ,) L, l\
.,!IL,l\ rL....1l1 ~,
t:-'...J L..:;,>~~)' I ..LJ,.r:J1~ \"s.:i..ll£_...J iY" j '0 >.J I 1~ 1 ; O! 0 • ; I l..1lW 13'(I" '1'• 'AI' . / V) .A' l. l. • / , / rv
~ u~ J~ ¥lbtl/.,.ulbtl"I~iI"!!;;,l 4.oj~1 '::'I.J~~I~.)-! 0j~ ~
~~ ~ 01~ ,~)lc.l , )L, l\ ~ )~ ~ ~l;jl ~I ~ 4=Jl.)L;J,13 ~~I,
..A , l. l. . / , l.n ~W I '?""" I.)...u1~ 10-" \},~<:.1 '-:!J ':l1
'F-"~ I ("-'~ 3 P 3L..:;F=U..l L........J 0-'~L:;,
III ~.J.7iJ.J ~~ ~LiII.J'{ij;.J
~l ~ /f:A."....J~, t'" ~)~ •~l~J/fJL.....J~It'";;.J~ •
~l$'il <JJ,.:J1~1..1SJ (OJt....J~1 t'";;)~ •
~\S.'il :;J,.:J1~l J.¥J ti~l....-/fJL.....J ~l t'";;)~ •
I"'/,./~....•,'\ ~'..JJ't t -I. Tf. c :-:1;1.:1'
<. \.) '::'W.>"'I
111111/llllllIlllllIlIlll 11111 ifl/I III 111111III
~.
~I'~e..
J]
~1
'Jr
~~
"-,
••,
.)
}j,Q
,].
•...~
(,-
,)0"
-<:::
t,"1
::1~
.....t.
J]
:.J~.
"
vJ-::'1
-,,.
II
II
..•J)
"'";:-
Y0-
••'"
).,J
-=J'Q
~~
,1-..
J4
.,J1,
3:~.~t
::1,--
~
~
.~-
"~J
••1
JoJ
-..J.
"'~
.3"-
~
J<
.,)
~
-
~.
"~
)
)
{l
:~.,
:v
••-..
.rJ
~JI
.t-..
,~, .•.
0'1-
3
~
.)0~
>-j
-..
1"t
•••
jI"J
l-..
,':J
~1
4{
~~
,.j.~
;..
•...~
.-.1'1,
:3'
~. .J'
.~1
.~T
J~
;J'1
1,
~,
'R:i
uJ'1
J.~
",.
.-'J.
-..
l-..1
~
,.j.~
~."
..,~
~
~
...::-.-
u
1,~
~
JI"
.,1
;J'.\
J....
JI,.
J.:J
,';/.'loJl
:::-J
j•...
~"
;;J~
.2'1
.J'••
31.
"1-
.!I.1-1
:J'1
-,)0.
1;J
~,J.
"J.1
!.!I
1"
-.
••1
,'0-=J
'OJ,
'Q
~1
:~"'
,.O'l
~
.2'J
~
.;J
~~J
1c
~1
.-J
,~J.:
"-
:j
,i
-=J.;;
..•
~Hl
J.:
'"..1)
.2'],'j
,.O'l
t.'!J
f..,
•....::::
1.2'
~{
~~~
3"'
1"-
.;~
,'5,~
"0'1
,"...
I:)
~~~
"-.J
~"],
.)03
~
V,.
-
3-1
Jj
•....
••
-,~'J
]-=J
.-~
•...:.J
d'-
\,:i'J
l..1'
.J',.O
'l~
},.
~
1<
u.J
",-
.-Jj
~'l.~
>-..l
'J,1••
..,}
~~
~~
-~,
..
~-
.'J.!!I.:l
.-..
......-
-.::.
-~~%
.•.1-
••••
'J-..
>-]
jj
••••
.~
3~
..1
"~
~-
=s,.......;
~,
"
}-
r'"1
,';/..1'
~~
~~
'1
.~~
"
.~
r~ '.D\~-.."!'
r1:::::=
~$;£
o"""
-'.
(034) :l9L1LJ cl.LoJl <LUll:!"96611 467 44 47 ...nJ~"96611467,\2 53 ~
ci.,!:.9LJ.lll1 Cl..,!-,IjL.JIll5..L.tI-(),JI11451v"u;)1 2455 w ..p
www.ksuedu.sa
.,: v 'I?, '",,'" .,'c'.CL...n.-O L....:i.:lQ2>JJ r..:J.1D.j1King Saud University
499 xxx Learning Outcomes
•• •
The student should be able to:1 Reco 'nize contemporary design, theOi ,and ractice.2 Define research techni ue suitable to the individual ro' ecl of research.3 Ex lain research techni ue s ccific to the individual ro'ect of research.4 Anal ze, com are and conclude the obtained results and conclusions.5 Direct himsel I' independently through the development and management of a
ro' ect of research,6 Demonstrate high quality communication skills in tutorials and in project
outcomes: in documents, artefacts and design work in appropriate visual,verbal, material and written formats.
Evaluation Criterion Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (5-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10) Team Score
Attendance 20% CanNever be found Occasionally in assigned area (s) Usually in assignedarea (s) Always in assigned area (s)
Appearance 5% Appearance unclean and Somewhat meets dress code Meets dress code look professional and neat
unprofessional
Ability to follow instruction Cannot follow the simplest Rarely able to follow instructions, Can usually follow basic Always able to follow
10% of Instructions no much help in department instructions with guidance instructions
Quality of the work 15% Quality of work often failed Quality of work sometimes failed Quality of work meet our Quality of work frequently
to meet our expectations to meet our expectations expectations exceeded our expectations
Motivation 10% Poor motivation, will not Fair motivation, sometimes Well.motivated, perform Highly motivated, wants to
perform tasks without direct requires assigned tasks tasks with little perform every task possible
order encouragement
Reaction to criticism 10% Very defensive with Sometimes defensive with Usually accepts criticism well Consistently accepts
criticism, makes no effort criticism, correct mistakes and tries to correct mistakes criticism well and tries to
correct mistakes occasionally correct mistakes
Group/Partner Team work Completely unwilling or Some difficulty adjusting Usually helps, works well with Always willing to help
10% unable to work with other personality to work with others most people anyone in need, easy to
people work with
leadership 5% Passive in respect to goal Was supportive but displayed Showed initiative in helping Was a positive force in
setting, initiating tasks and little initiative in moving the team the team solve problems and looking ahead and
resolving problems towards its goals achieve its goals supporting other teammembers to achieve itsgoals
Safety 15% Proper safety precautions Proper safety precautions arc Proper safety precautions are Proper safety precautions
are consistently used generally used often missed are consistently missed
Evaluation Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (5-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10) Team
CriterionScore
Summary and The summary is missing or exists The summary is like an introduction The sumlTlary is just reflect the report The summary is professional and creates
Content but lacks a lot of relevant to the report. It lacks some of the parts and include the necessary curiosity in the reader to go further in the
information about the work. important information about the information such as motivation, report. The content is well organized.
S% work. The content is will presented. problem statement, deliverables .. The
content is complete.
Introduction The introduction provides The introduction contains scientific The introduction contains enough The introduction contains complete scientific
and scientific incorrect statement of the background about the work. scientific background about the work, background about the work, the scope of the
background problem.the scope of the project; organization project, organization of the report. It also
of the report. includes concluding remarks about the content
10%presented in the report
Problem The problem is roughly stated. The The problem is stated. The proposed The problem is clearly stated. The The problem is clearly stated. The proposed
Statement and proposed solution and objectives solution is identified. The objectives proposed solution is clearly identified. solution and measurable objectives are clearly
Objectives are not identified. are presented but not measurable. Objectives are identified with some of identified.
them are not measurable.
10%
Experimental Important parts of the description Overall description of most parts of Adequate description of all parts of the Full description of all parts of the
Procedure of the experimental/theoretical the experimental/theoretical systems experimental/theoretical systems and experimental/theoretical systems and
systems and procedures are and procedures are indicated with procedures are indicated with procedures are clearly indicated with all
25% missing. Diagrams and figures are some diagrams and figures are diagrams and figures. related diagrams and figures.
missing. missing.
Results, Lack of presenting results. Obtained results arc partially Obtained results are clearly presented, Obtained results are clearly presented,
Conclusion No conclusion neither suggestedpresented and discussed with discussed and analyzed. Brief evaluated, discussed and analyzed. Agreement
missmg analysis and suggested future conclusion and suggested work are between the obtained results and other'sand Suggested work are provided.
workwork. included. results are discussed and justified. A
conclusion and suggested work based on the
30%analysis are included.
language The language is bad in Older to Problematic language, sometimes Good language is used in the report Strong language is adopted in writing the report.
understand the report idea. Text is making it difficult to understand the with rare difficulties. Some errors or errors or typing mistakes observed 10 the report.
10% full of errors and typing mistakes. whole report clearly. Frequent errors typing mistakes observed.
and tYping mistakes are observed.
Organization The report has many major The report has some deficiencies The report is bound and has an The report has a professional KSU format with
and mistakes related to the format. with the format. Some of the acceptable format. Most of the a consistent style and appropriate page
Appearance ofMany sections, tables and figures standards sections and figures are standards sections of a report are numbers. All standards sections of a report
the Reportare missing. A list of references is missing. A list of references is lOcluded. Captioned figures and tables arc exist. The needed supplementary details
not provided. present With incomplete CItations are present. A list of references exist are included as appendices. Captioned clear
10% and incOHect reference numbels. with adequate ("Itatians in the text. figuH's and tables are present. A suitable list ofreferences is plOvided with correct citations in
the tcxt dnd figures.
Evaluation Criterion Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (5-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10) Team
Presentation (lfthe Project Score
Sign ificance/Purpose: Even with follow.up, Moderate further Minimal further Significance/Purpose is clearly
Student clearly and concisely explained significance/purpose is unclear. explanation/follow-up needed. explanation/follow.up needed. presented for a generalist
the significance or purpose of the audience
project to a generalist audience. 15%
Methodology/Process: Even with follow-up, Moderate use of jargon nece$sitate$ Minimal jargon and dear Jargon.free; few follow-up
Student explained what methods or method/process is unclear questions to clarify. response to few follow-up questions needed
processes he used, as well as why he questions
used them, to conduct the project. 15%
Results/Findings: Student(s) is unable to articulate Connections articulated only with Appropriately articulated with Connections are clearly
Student clearly presented his results connections even with follow-up follow.up. minimal follow.up required. articulated.
and findings and connect them to the questions.
stated Problem Statement and
Objectives. 20%
Quality of the Project INonverbal Skills: Nonverbal behaviors (Avoids eye could improve on eye. contact, only minimal discomfort or No need for improvement with
Student demonstrated strong nonverbal contact, arms crossed, chewing gestures/movement, and/or nervousness exhibited. nonverbal presentation skills.
communication skills, such as gum, etc.) disengage rather than attention to nonverbal cues.
professional demeanor, eye.contact, engage audience.
gestures and movement. 15%
Verbal/Oral Presentation: Issues with articulations, good basic verbal skills but some strong verbal skills with only No need for improvement with
Student demonstrated strong verbal ramblings, etc. detract from the habits/practices distract from minor issues such as habitual verbal/oral presentation skills.
skills: he articulate clearly and slowly verbal/oral presentation. understanding. "urn" or "so" articulations.
with little to no stumbling, mumbling,
rambling, or unnecessary articulations
such as "urn" or "so". 15%
Skills Responses to Judges: Student Issup.s with articulations, good basic verbal skills but some strong verbal skills with only No need for improvement with
welcomed comments or questions and ramblings, etc. detract from the habits/practices distract from minor issues such as habitual verbal/oral presentation skills.
provide appropriate and thoughtful verbal/oral presentation. understanding. "um" or "so" articulations.
responses, even if the response is to
share that a comment/Question is
beyond the scope of the project. 20%
Evaluation Criterion Unsatisfactory (0-4) Marginally Satisfactory (S-6) Good (7-8) Excellent (9-10)TeamScore
Significance/Purpose: Student Evenwith follow-up, Moderate further Minimal furtherSignificance/Purpose is
clearly and concisely explains the significance/purpose is explanation/follow-up needed. explanation/follow-u p clearly presented for a
significance or purpose of the unclear. needed. generalist audience
project to a generalist audience.15%
Methodology/Process: Student Evenwith follow.up, Moderate use of jargon Minimal jargon and clear Jargon-free; few follow-up
explains what methods or processes method/process is necessitates questions to response to few follow.up questions needed
they used, aswell aswhy they used unclear. clarify. questions.
them, to conduct the project. 15%
Results/Findings: Student clearly Student(s) is unable to Connections articulated only Appropriately articulated Connections are clearly
presents their results and findings articulate connections with follow-up. with minimal follow-up articulated.
and connects them to the stated even with follow.up required.
significance or purpose of the questions.project. 20%
Coherence/Organization: the poster Not clearly organized, Organization, proofreading, Organized with only minimal The poster is of near-
iswell-organized, easy to read, free contains visible use of font, color, or visuals mistakes. Font, color, and professional quality in its
of mistakes, and makes good use of mistakes, and is difficult need enhancement. visuals contribute to organization and
font, color and visuals. 15% to read. readability. coherence.
Content: Poster content is Content detracts from Needs considerable Needs limited additional Content is purposeful and
pllfposeful and understandable to rather than enhancing explanation. explanation. easily understood by an
an informed generalist. 15% understanding of the informed generalist.
project.
Contribution: The poster contributes The poster does not add The poster's contribution to Overall, the paste adds The poster is a meaningful
meaningfully to the student report value, or seems the report or presentation is value to the report or and well-integrated part of
or presentation of the project. 20% unrelated to the report minimal, or somewhat presentation and helps in the report or presentation.
or presentation. confusing. understanding the project.
King Saud University
College of Science
Department of…… College of Science
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A template for Assessment of student performance in Research Project
during 14…. /14….
Student Name: Student Number:
Project Title: *Course Code:
Type of assessment: Formative
Assessment strategy: Observation, group activities, written work
*Course code means code of course 499 or 497
Names of student Supervisor:
Signature:
Evaluation Criterion Proportions of the
assessment Marks
Supervisor Marks
Attendance 12
Appearance 3
Ability to follow instruction 6
Quality of the work 9
Motivation 6
Reaction to criticism 6
Group/Partner Team work 6
Leadership 3
Safety 9
Total 60 Marks
King Saud University
College of Science
Department of…… College of Science
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A template for Assessment of Student Report of Research Project during
14…. /14….
Student Name: Student Number:
Project Title: *Course Code:
Type of assessment: Summative
Assessment strategy: Reviewing
*Course code means code of course 499 or 497
Assessment Team: Signature:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Evaluation Criterion Proportions of
the assessment
Marks
Assessment
Committee
Marks
Summary and Content 1
Introduction and scientific background 2
Problem Statement and Objectives 2
Experimental Procedure 5
Results, Conclusion and Suggested work 6
Language 2
Organization and Appearance of the
Report
2
Total 20 Marks
King Saud University
College of Science
Department of…… College of Science
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A template for Assessment of Student Presentation of Research Project
during 14…. /14….
Student Name: Student Number:
Project Title: *Course Code:
Type of assessment: Summative
Assessment strategy: Observation, discussion
*Course code means code of course 499 or 497
Assessment Team: Signature:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Evaluation Criterion Proportions of
the assessment
Marks
Assessment
Committee Marks
Significance/Purpose 1.5
Methodology/Process 1.5
Results/Findings 2
Nonverbal Skills:. 1.5
Verbal/Oral Presentation: 1.5
Skills Responses to Judges: 2
Total 10 Marks
King Saud University
College of Science
Department of…… College of Science
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A template for Assessment of Student Poster of Research Project during
14…. /14….
Student Name: Student Number:
Project Title: *Course Code:
Type of assessment: Summative
Assessment strategy: Observation, Discussion
*Course code means code of course 499 or 497
Assessment Team: Signature:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Evaluation Criterion Proportions of the
assessment Marks
Assessment Committee
Marks
Significance/Purpose: 1.5
Methodology/Process 1.5
Results/Findings: 2
Coherence/Organization: 1.5
Content: 1.5
Contribution:. 2
Total 10 Marks