13
Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225 213 MATLAB Simulation of IEEE 802.11p Technology on High User’s Mobility Mountaciri Abderrahim a , Makroum Elmostafa a , Youssefi My Abdelkader a a Laboratoire d’Ingénierie, de Management Industriel et d’Innovation (LIMII), Faculté ́ des Sciences et techniques (FST), université Hassan I, Settat, Morroco. Corresponding author. E-mail : [email protected] Received 12 Apr 2021, Revised 17 May 2021, Accepted 13 Jun 2021 Abstract In this article proposed IEEE 802.11p Physical layer (PHY). A MATLAB simulation is performed to analyze the baseband processing of the transceiver. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is applied in this project according to the IEEE 802.11p standard, which allows data transmission rates from 3 to 27 Mbps. Separate modulation schemes, bit phase shift modulation (BPSK), quadrate phase shift modulation (QPSK), and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), are used for different data rates. These schemes are combined with time interleaving and a convolutional error correction code. A guard interval is inserted at the start of the transmitted symbol to reduce the effect of intersymbol interference (ISI). This article studies the PHY physical layer of the IEEE 802.11p vehicular communication standard. An IEEE.802.11p PHY model, with many associated phenomena, is implemented in the V2V vehicle-to- vehicle, and the vehicle-to-vehicle ad hoc network (VANET) provides convenient coordination between moving vehicles. A moving vehicle could move at a very high speed, producing a Doppler effect that damages OFDM symbols and also causes inter- carrier interference (ICI). This article has discussed VANET technology versus 802.11a technology, as they have many differences when it comes to user mobility. The Doppler effect resulting from the mobility of the user with a high speed of 25 to 400 km / h has been studied as the main parameter, the estimation of the channel based on the lms algorithm has been proposed in order to improve the performance of the physical physical chain Keywords : ANET, OFDM, 802.11p, Doppler Effect, power spectral Density. Introduction Vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure ommunications aim to reduce road accidents, automatic fare collection, route information, working lights, etc. The Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Consortium (C2C-CC) is a non-profit industrial organization supporting the creation of a European standard for future communicating vehicles covering all brands. The 802.11p standard

MATLAB Simulation of IEEE 802.11p Technology on High User

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

213

MATLAB Simulation of IEEE 802.11p Technology on High

User’s Mobility

Mountaciri Abderrahima, Makroum Elmostafaa, Youssefi My Abdelkadera

a Laboratoire d’Ingénierie, de Management Industriel et d’Innovation (LIMII), Faculté ́ des Sciences et

techniques (FST), université Hassan I, Settat, Morroco.

Corresponding author. E-mail : [email protected]

Received 12 Apr 2021, Revised 17 May 2021, Accepted 13 Jun 2021

Abstract

In this article proposed IEEE 802.11p Physical layer (PHY). A MATLAB simulation is performed to

analyze the baseband processing of the transceiver. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing

(OFDM) is applied in this project according to the IEEE 802.11p standard, which allows data

transmission rates from 3 to 27 Mbps. Separate modulation schemes, bit phase shift modulation

(BPSK), quadrate phase shift modulation (QPSK), and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), are

used for different data rates. These schemes are combined with time interleaving and a convolutional

error correction code. A guard interval is inserted at the start of the transmitted symbol to reduce the

effect of intersymbol interference (ISI). This article studies the PHY physical layer of the IEEE

802.11p vehicular communication standard. An IEEE.802.11p PHY model, with many associated

phenomena, is implemented in the V2V vehicle-to- vehicle, and the vehicle-to-vehicle ad hoc network

(VANET) provides convenient coordination between moving vehicles. A moving vehicle could move

at a very high speed, producing a Doppler effect that damages OFDM symbols and also causes inter-

carrier interference (ICI). This article has discussed VANET technology versus 802.11a technology,

as they have many differences when it comes to user mobility. The Doppler effect resulting from the

mobility of the user with a high speed of 25 to 400 km / h has been studied as the main parameter, the

estimation of the channel based on the lms algorithm has been proposed in order to improve the

performance of the physical physical chain

Keywords : ANET, OFDM, 802.11p, Doppler Effect, power spectral Density.

Introduction

Vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure ommunications aim to reduce road accidents,

automatic fare collection, route information, working lights, etc. The Vehicle-to-Vehicle

Communication Consortium (C2C-CC) is a non-profit industrial organization supporting the creation

of a European standard for future communicating vehicles covering all brands. The 802.11p standard

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

214

is designed for use in vehicle-2-vehicle and vehicle-2-infrastructure communications. This standard

is based on the same structures as that of the 802.11a standard; The IEEE 802.11p standard typically

uses 10 MHz bandwidth channels in the 5.9 GHz band (5.850–5.925 GHz). This is half the bandwidth,

or double the transmission time for a specific data symbol, as used in 802.11aVehicle-to-vehicle and

vehicle-to-infrastructure communications aim to reduce road accidents, automatic fare collection,

route information, working lights, etc. The Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Consortium (C2C-

CC) is a non-profit industrial organization supporting the creation of a European standard for future

communicating vehicles covering all brands. The 802.11p standard is designed for use in vehicle-2-

vehicle and vehicle-2-infrastructure communications. This standard is based on the same structures

as that of the 802.11a standard; The IEEE 802.11p standard typically uses 10 MHz bandwidth

channels in the 5.9 GHz band (5.850–5.925 GHz). This is half the bandwidth, or double the

transmission time for a specific data symbol, as used in 802.11a.

1. Physical layer specifications

1.1. PHY IEEE 802.11 a and IEEE 802.11 p.

The RF LAN system is initially planned for 5.15-5.25, 5.25-5.35 and 5.725-5.825 GHz unlicensed;

in the National Information Structure (U-NII) bands, the OFDM system provides a wireless LAN

with useful data rates of 6, 9, 12, 18,24, 36, 48 and 54 Mbit/s. The support for data transmission and

reception rates of 6, 12 and 24 Mbit / s are mandatory. The system uses 52 subcarriers which are

modulated by binary or quadrature phase modulation (BPSK/QPSK), quadrature amplitude

modulation (QAM) 16 or quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) 64. Forward error correction

coding (convolutional coding) is used with a coding rate of 1/2, 2/3 or 3/4. Figure 2 shows the format

of the PPDU, where the preamble of the OFDM PLCP, the OFDM PLCP header, the PSDU, the tail

bits and the range bits are shown. The PLCP header contains the following fields : LENGTH, RATE,

a reserved bit, an even parity bit and the SERVICE field. In terms of modulation, LENGTH, RATE,

reserved bit and parity bit (with 6 tail bits "zero" in the appendix) form a single, separate OFDM

symbol, called SIGNAL, which is transmitted with the most robust combination of BPSK modulation

and a coding rate of R = 1/2. The SERVICE field of the PLCP header and the PSDU (with 6 "zero"

tail bits and padding bits), called DATA, are transmitted at the data rate described in the RATE field

and can constitute several OFDM symbols. The tail bits in the SIGNAL symbol allow the decoding

of the RATE and LENGTH fields immediately after receiving the tail bits. The RATE and LENGTH

fields are required to decode the DATA part of the packet. IEEE 802.11p is a standard based on

802.11-2007 [2] PHY is based on OFDM and is analogous to 802.11a. to analyze the physical layer

of 802.11p, with the most important parameters making the comparison with IEEE 802. 11 a,

developed for communication between vehicles and operates within the 802.11p standard at a

frequency of 5, 9 GHz, the bandwidth of 802.11p is 10 MHz, which is half the bandwidth of 802.11a.

The distribution of any signal is accompanied by attenuation, which depends on the distance from the

point of transmission and the frequency of the signal. The received signal can vary due to reflections

from moving vehicles, many copies of the signal arrive at the receiving antenna with different levels

and delays, in order to avoid the negative influence of signal interference. The received signal may

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

215

vary due to reflections from moving vehicles and many copies of the signal arrive atthe receiving

antenna with different levels and delays, in order to avoid the negative influence of the interference.

OFDM is used, its realization in the transmitter using the inverse Fourier transform (IFFT), consider

the first N-carriers multiplexed on the signal of the temporal frequency representation.The 802.11p

standard uses the IFFT with a window of 64 frequency (N) subcarriers. Since the channel has a

bandwidth of 10 MHz (Bw), each orthogonal frequency subcarrier has a spacing of Bw / N = 0.15625

MHz (Δf). Among the64 orthogonal subcarriers, 56 are used: 52 - data tones, 4 pilottones. The cyclic

prefix (CP) is an important part of OFDM. The CP is the last part of the signal, which is added at the

beginning. A fragment of the desired signal is transmitted to the CP; it guarantees the orthogonality

of the subcarriers in the received signal. The CP is redundant information, which reduces the

transmission speed, but protects against inter-symbol interference. The duration of the CP depends

on the decoder and the maximum receiver. The longer the delay, the longer the CP duration should

be. The IEEE 802.11p [3]. standard offers data transmission rates of 3, 4.5, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 27

Mbps; the frequency range used is 5,850 to 5,925 GHz, which is divided into 7 channels of 10 MHz.

The standard is based communications. The transmission bandwidth is divided into several narrow

sub-channels, which are transmitted in parallel. Ideally, each sub-channel is narrow enough that the

fading it experiences is flat.

2 Flow and delay limit

To achieve maximum flow and minimum delay for a real WAVE system where several vehicles are

struggling for wireless support [4]. The lowest data rate of 3 Mbps is used. The physical layer

convergence procedure protocol data unit (PPDU) of the IEEE 802.11 PHY consists of a Layer

Convergence Procedure (PLCP) preamble, PLCP header ,tail bits and fill bits of the physical layer

service data unit (PSDU), such as illustrated in figure 2. The PSDU format includes a MAC header,

Frame body and Fram as other keys parameters are summarized in Tables 1.Because the broadcast does

not require an ACK frame, the maximum throughput in (3) can be further simplified to e Check

Sequence (FCS) field. Values the duration of Tpm , Tsg and Tda, as well

Figure 1 -PPDU frame format for IEEE 802.11p OFDM PHY.

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

216

𝐿𝑝𝑑 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑦𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ [0 − 2048] × 8 𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑠 , 𝑻𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒂 is the data transmission duration for

given by 𝑇𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 = Tpm + Tsg + Tsym[16+lhd+Lpdd+Lfcs+6

NDPBS]

lhd is the data MAC Layer header with a size of 328 bits lfcs is the frame check sequence (FCS)with a

size of 4 × 8 bits? 𝑵𝑫𝑷𝑩𝑺is the data bit per OFDM symbol given n table 1 .The packet delay is defined

as the time duration of a packet transmission and its successful reception. The minimum delay is given

by 𝑀𝐷 = Tdata + Tprop + TDIFS +𝐂𝐖𝐚𝐯𝐠 the maximum throughput limit (MTL) and minimum delay

limit (MDL) are shown The MTL and MDL are obtained by assuming that the NDBPS are infinite such

that the time duration for a data transmission is zero. The maximum throughput of IEEE 802.11p is

approximately 18 Mbps for the 27- Mbps PHY mode with a payload of 2,000 bytes, whereas the upper

limit is around 80 Mbps for an payload of 2,000 bytes, whereas The Maximum Throughput Limit (MTL)

and Minimum Delay Limit (MDL) are obtained by assuming that the NDBPS are infinite so that the

duration of a data transmission is zero. The maximum data rate for IEEE 802.11p is approximately 18

Mbps for the 27-Mbps PHY mode with a 2000-byte payload, while the upper limit is approximately 80

Mbps for an infinite data rate. The minimum delay is about 0.8 ms for 27-Mbps PHY mode with QAM;

the data rates that the 802.11a standard allows are 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 54 Mbps. An OFDM

symbol is sent to each 4μs, of which 0.8 μs is the cyclic prefix. As

Table 1-PHY modes and NDBPS of IEEE 802.11p

Datarate (Mbit/s) modulation Code rate 𝑵𝑫𝑩𝑷𝑺

1 3 BPSK 1/2 24

2 4.5 BPSK 3/4 36

3 6 QPSK 1/2 48

4 9 QPSK 3/4 72

5 12 16QAM 1/2 96

6 18 16QAM 3/4 144

7 24 64QAM 2/3 192

8 27 64QAM 3/4 216

250 000 symbols are sent every second, and one symbol uses 48 data carriers, a bit rate of 6 Mb/s is

obtained with BPSK modulation and a half rate convolutional code (48*1/2 *250000 = 6 Mb/s). To

determine the differences between the 802.11a and 802.11p standards, this document uses the BER (bit

error rate) as a comparison parameter. The channel used is an awgn and fading rayleigh channel; these

channels can be used for the 802.11a and 802.11p standards because they have the same structure. The

characteristics of the channels are taken from the literature The impulse channel response decreases

exponentially with delay. Characterized by the Rayleigh a Typical office environment for NLOS

condition with 50 ns RMS delay spreading a Gaussian channel - channel with additive white Gaussian

noise (AWGN).

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

217

3 Resultats and discusion :

3.1 Fading in v2v channel

The V2V channel, in which both transmitter and receiver can be mobile, is a relatively newer area of

study. Wireless channels can be modeled either deterministically, or statistically [5, 6]. statistical

models are the most widely used because they do not attempt to provide an exact estimate the small

size of a scale chain of fading characteristics at points in space at a given time; instead, they try to

faithfully mimic the variation of these effects’ channels. small-scale discoloration, which most often

occurs due to destructive interference from several replicas of the transmitted signal arriving at the

receiver with different delays due to several reflections from several beams from buildings and other

installations as shown in figure 3 As an example autoroute to 6-lane highways with speeds ranging from

25 to more than 40 m/s and different traffic densities. Two-lane rural roads with speeds up to 30 m/s.

There are few buildings and the vehicle density is low. One and two-lane suburban roads streets. Traffic

density is generally low and speeds are limited to about 15 m/s or less on urban streets. They are

characterized by wider streets and higher traffic density than suburban streets. in order to describe the

frequency and temporal behavior of the channel . For an information carrying signal transmitted by the

channel havin𝑔 𝐵𝑇 bandwidth. the channel is said to have frequency selective fading if Bc is less than

𝐵𝑇, it is said to be non-frequency selective or to uniform fading if bc is greater than bt the consistency

band is defined

Figure 2- Illustration of the multi-path physical environment

maximum of the delay propagation delay, respectively. 𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑥 is defined to be less than the upper value

propagation with limited delay 𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 𝑇𝐺𝐼 = 1.6 μs The coherence time of the channel event is linked

to the vehicle speed v frequency, c is the speed of light and v is the speed of the vehicle. A slowly

changing channel has a small Doppler frequency or, equivalently, a large coherence time. If the

coherence time Tc is small, compared to the measured time interval Tm of the transmitted signal, the

channel is said to be fast fading. Otherwise, the channel is said to be slow fading. the channel parameters

include 𝐵𝑇 , Tm and τlim. 𝐵𝑇 = 10 MHz ; the measured signal interval Tm = packet time = 840 μs;

each transmitted packet contains 100 orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols; the

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

218

maximum delay spreading time τmax is set to be less than the guard interval (GI) TGI of the OFDM

symbol, i.e. the limit of the maximum delay spreading time τlim = TGI = 1.6μs table 4 abstract four

types of multipath fading channels [11] The simulation of the model follows the structure of the

transmitter and the receiver of the standards 802.11a and 802.11p in figure 4 The transmitter has been

implemented with the steps: convolutional encoding with an encoding rate of R = 1/2 , BPSK modulation

mapping, IFFT implementation for 64 points, add CP. The effects of fading channel and white Gaussian

noise are added. The receiver includes the following steps: CP removal, FFT implementation for 64

points, BPSK modulation demapping, and error code decoding using Viterbi's hard decision algorithm.

To determine the differences between the 802.11a and 802.11p standards, [7] this article calculates the

BER ratio as a function of Eb / N0 for a channel with fading of type awgn and RAYLEIGH l despite the

increase in momentum, Doppler shift and difficult channel characteristics. the increase in momentum,

Doppler shift and difficult channel characteristics. The typical propagation of the effective delay for an

LOS signal component can be up to 320 ns, seen in Table 2 this can be

Table 2-condition of fading channel in DSRC

FLAT FADING FREQUENCY SELECTIVE

FADING

SLOW FADING

0 ≤ 𝑟𝑅𝑀𝑆 ≤ 20 𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑐

0≤𝑓𝑑 ≤ 595,2𝐻𝑧

0≤v≤v≤109 km/h

20𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑐 ≤ 𝑟𝑅𝑀𝑆 ≤ 320 𝑛𝑠𝑒

0≤𝑓𝑑 ≤ 595,2𝐻𝑧

0≤v≤v≤109 km/h

FAST FADING

0 ≤ 𝑟𝑅𝑀𝑆 ≤ 20 𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑐

595,2 ≤ 𝑓𝑑 ≤ 595,2𝐻𝑧

109km/h≤ v≤400km/h

20𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑐 ≤ 𝑟𝑅𝑀𝑆 ≤ 320 𝑛𝑠𝑒

595,2 ≤ 𝑓𝑑 ≤ 2185,2𝐻𝑧

109km/h≤v≤v≤400 km/h

more or less interpreted as (root mean square of) the time difference between the LOS comonent

and the last non component. The guard time is 1.6 s, therefore the guard time is sufficient to eliminate

ISI. However, according, If we assume a maximum speed of 400 km / h, the maximum Doppler

propagation will be 2185.2 KHz and this indicates a channel coherence time of 228.8s.

Figure 3 -IEEE 8023.11 p transmitter and receiver

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

219

. A transmitted frame should not be `` on-air '' longer than this period, or the drive symbols at the start

of a frame will not be long enough and the signal may become too distorted. The size of the frame which

it depends on the bit rate, but it is only 686 bits for the lowest data rate (3 Mbit / s 228.8μs). Since the

probability of bit error (in a AWGN channel) of a communication system depends only on the SNR

per bit or Eb / N0, the energy per bit is doubled in 802.11p. Symbol time in 802.11p is doubled and

data rate is divided by If the data rate is halved and the transmit power remains the same, a symbol

contains twice the energy it makes in 802.11a, which means energy doubled by symbol and energy

doubled per bit (equation 𝑃𝑠 = 𝑄(√2𝐸𝑏

𝑁0) ;

𝐸𝑏

𝑁0 is the effective signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per bit where

Eb is the energy per bit, N0 is the noise density in W/Hz Q (x) is the function Q, which is the distribution

function of a Gaussian distribution i.e. the integral which calculates the area under the right tail). Figure

5 gives the differences between the 802.11a and 802.11p standards The type of modulation used in this

simulation is binary phase shift modulation (BPSK). Although BPSK has a lower transmission rate, it

is often used for security or high mobility applications due to its lower BER property By comparing the

BER as a function of the SNR we can notice that the IEEE 802.11 p standard is better than the IEEE

802.11 a standard for a fixed SNR the p standard presents a low value of the BER in comparison with

the a standard due to its better reliability

Figure 4 -BER curves BPSK for IEEE 802.11a and IEEE 802.11 p

3.2 Doppler shift in IEEE 802.11 P

Doppler shift When a source vehicle and a receiver vehicle move relative to each other, the

frequency of the received signal will not be the same as the source. [8] When they get closer to each

other, the frequency of the received signal is higher than the source, and it decreases when they get

closer as seen in [9]. The Doppler effect has a great effect on vehicle networks due to the

VANET mobility Doppler shift When a source vehicle and a receiver vehicle move relative to

each other, the frequency of the received signal will not be the same as the source. [8] When they get

closer to each other, the frequency of the received signal is higher than the source, and it decreases when

they get closer as seen in [9]. The Doppler effect has a great effect on vehicle networks due to

the VANET mobility the frequency Doppler shift can be calculated ∆𝑓 = ±𝑓𝑐𝑣

𝑐 ⁄ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝛽𝒄 ;∆𝒇

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

220

where is the deviation of the source vehicle frequency at the receiver. The frequency of the source is 𝒇𝒄

, 𝒗 is the speed difference between the source and transmitter vehicles, and c is the light velocity. In

vehicular networks the range of 𝑓𝑐=5.9GHZ for simulation we choose v є [25, 400km/h ] wich give ∆𝑓

є[136, 2185,2𝐻𝑧] for Doppler shift,.. OFDM symbol is very sensitive to the Doppler Shift. An OFDM

signal can be represented by 𝑣(𝑡) = ∑ 𝐴𝑖 cos(ω𝑖𝑁𝑠−1𝑖=1 𝑡 + 𝜑𝑖) 𝐴𝑖 ,ω𝑖 , 𝜑𝑖 be represented as respective

values of the amplitude, angular frequency, and phase of subcarrier used from the it to OFDM

signal. If Ns are the number of subcarriers used in OFDM, then each subcarrier must be orthogonal to

one another. This can be obtained if 𝑓𝑖 =ω𝑖 2𝜋⁄ which is the integer multiplication of1 2𝑇⁄ , with T is

the period of the data, and f1 is the frequency range with a value of 𝑅𝑠 =1

𝑇⁄ .If we continued equation

(2) with processing at up converter side to produce 5,9 GHz frequency, (2)becomes,𝑉𝑖 = 𝐴𝑖

cos( 𝜔𝑖 𝑡 +𝜑𝑖)𝑒−(𝑗2𝜋𝑓𝑐t) if he value 𝐴𝑖 cos( 𝜔𝑖 𝑡 + 𝜑𝑖) = 𝑆𝑖 then𝑽𝒊 = 𝑺𝒊𝒆−(𝒋𝟐𝝅𝒇c t) (3) When the value of

𝑒−(𝑗2𝜋𝑓𝑐) and τ𝑖 represents the carrier frequency and delay to the it component of the received signal,

respectively. If the vehicle moves at a constant velocity v, and each vehicle moves straight with 𝛽 =

0 then the value of the transmitted signal is affected by the value of 𝑣𝑐 ⁄ cos 𝛽 so the equation (3)

become 𝑽𝒊 = 𝑺𝒊𝒆−(𝒋𝟐𝝅𝒇𝒄) τ𝑖 𝒆(𝒋𝟐𝝅∆𝒇)𝒕 with (𝑗2𝜋∆𝑓 𝑡) is a value from phase-changing at the transmitted

signal. If the value of t = ¼ Δf , then the equation becomes 𝑉𝑖 = 𝑗𝑒−(𝑗2𝜋𝑓𝑐) τ𝑖 Assuming the period is ¼ of

the Doppler shift 0 ≤ ∆𝒇 ≤ ±𝟐. 𝟏𝟖𝟓𝒌𝑯𝒛 , the MATLAB simulation model see APPENDIX 1 is

calculated for a variation in vehicle speed of 25.75,125 175 225 and 400 km / h, the SNR varies from 1

to 40 dB Figure 6 gives the result of parameters such as as defined by the IEEE 802.11p standard, the

channel used is a combination of a Rayleigh and an AWGN. For the BER 10e-3 value if the mobile speed

is 30 km / h. no communication can be performed when the SNR is less than 10 dB; for communication

to be effective at SNR = 16 dB, the maximum relative speed must be less than or equal to 175 km / h.

Fig 6 describes the impact of the Doppler effect in the IEEE 802.11 p standard due to the high mobility

of the channel, we observe that the BER decreases if the speed increases which deters the transmission,

a matlab program describing the operation of the IEEE 802.11a PHY layer gives in APPENDIX 2

encoding process consists of many steps, the transmitted bits are generated with the data source

component. These data are modulated using phase-shift modulation (BPSK or QPSK) or amplitude

modulation (16-QAM or 64 QAM) the transmitted signal rate which can vary by 3 Mb / s (with BPSK

and 1/2 code rate) at 27 Mb / s (with 64-QAM and 3/4 code rate . In order to compare the modulation,

M - ary, figure 7 and figure8 , respectively give the BER the qam 4 and the qam 64, figure 9 and

10 respectively give the constellations which are the distance between points I and Q modulation

system for M = 4 and M = 64 4-QAM has been found to offer the best performance (lowest BER)

compared to 16-QAM and 64-QAM. The results of the comparison also show that a modulation

scheme with a lower constellation value has better BER performance due to the higher bit rate we

note the influence of the Rayleigh type channel. We conclude the error performance of the 4QAM-

OFDM, 8QAM-OFDM and 16QAM-OFDM systems on the AWGN channel and the Rayleigh fading

channel. It is observed from the simulation results that the signal power increases the error rate decreases

in both AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels but the error rate increases as the value of the modulation

scheme the error data can be reduced as well as transmission easily influenced by noise. the error data

can be reduced as well as transmission easily influenced by noise. 64 QAM is much better than 4 QAM

when BER decreases SNR increases because signal is stronger than noise. 64QAM modulation requires

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

221

because signal is stronger than noise. . the error data can be reduced as well as transmission easily

influenced by noise. 64 QAM is much better than 4 QAM when BER decreases SNR increasesbecause

signal is stronger than noise. 64QAM modulation requires because signal is stronger than noise. 64QAM

modulation requires to 4QAM We also validate the communication performance of OFDM systems

proposed by the MATLAB simulation is the result of experimentation with the BER (Bit Error Rate)

test with different SNR (Signal Noise Ratios). It may be observed that

Figure 5-BER BPSK . V є [ 25 , 400km/h ]

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

222

figure 6- BER Vs SNR 4QAM

Figure 7 -BER V s SNR 64QAM

he system has better noise canceling capability, BER decreases rapidly with increasing SNR. Also, in

the same state of SNR, 16QAM has a lower BER than BPSK. It shows that, M-ary modulation system

has higher bandwidth utilization than binary modulation but it has less advantages in noise canceling

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

223

capability. Figure 11 (a) is the time domain waveform of OFDM.. Figure 11 (b) represents the power

spectrum density of the modulated OFDM signal which contains 52 subcarriers, it shows that the data

of the OBUs are correctly modulated on the relevant subcarriers

Figure8-received constellation 4 QAM

Figure 9 - received constellation 64 QAM

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

224

Figure 10 (a)-time domain waveform of OFDM in BPSK

Figure 11 (b) -represents the power spectrum density

4 Conclusion

In this work, we focused on the IEEE 802.11 standard which has been adapted for inter- vehicular

communication aiming at providing allow latency and high reliability. A near realistic IEEE.802.11p

PHY model for vehicular communication is developed taking account of DOPPLER SHIFT phenomena

associated. The BER performance of OFDM and M-QAM modulation schemes under AWGN and

Rayleigh channel has been investigated. The 4- QAM, 16- QAM, and 64-QAM modulation schemes

under Rayleigh fading channel has been simulated and the results of these three modulation schemes

have been compared. It was found that 4-QAM gives the best performance (the lowest BER) compared

Mountaciri & al./ Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 7 N°2(2021) 213-225

225

to 8-QAM and 16- QAM. The comparison results also shows that a modulation scheme with lower

constellation value has better BER performance because of having higher bit rate. The performance of

QAM and QPSK modulation schemes has also been compared. It was found that the QPSK gives lower

BER compared to QAM modulation scheme. It is also observed that the lower the order of modulation

techniques is, the better system performance is obtained without the consideration of spectral efficiency.

Finally, the performances of QPSK-based OFDM, 16-QAMbased OFDM, and 64-QAM-based OFDM

in Rayleigh channel has also been compared. It was found that the QPSK-based OFDM always give

the lowest BER compared to the 16-QAM-based OFDM and 64-QAM-based OFDM in order to

increase the throughput, performance of IEEE 802 a with BPSK modulation and IEEE802.11 p with

BPSK and also Doppler effect it conclude that IEEE 802.11 p offer the lower BER .The technology

(MIMO) implemented in the V2V technology is used for higher rate bit and lower BER will be the

subject of my futur work

References

1. CSU, Q., Mac, T., Kop, J., & Sengupta, R. (2004, October). Vehicle-to-vehicle safety messagng

in DSRC. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks

(pp. 19-28).

2. IEEE Std. P802.11p/D3.0, “Draft Amendment for Wireless Accessing Vehicular Environments

(WAVE)”, July, 2007.

3. Li, Y. J. (2010, November). An overview of the DSRC/WAVE technology. In International

Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness (pp.

544-558). Springer, Berlin, Heidel

4. Song, Y. S., & Choi, H. K. (2017). Analysis of V2V broadcast performance limit for WAVE

communication systems using two‐ray path loss model. ETRI Journal, 39(2), 213-221.

5. Vivek, N., Srikanth, S. V., Saurabh, P., Vamsi, T. P., & Raju, K. (2014, February). On field

performance analysis of IEEE 802.11 p and WAVE protocol stack for V2V & V2I

communication. In International Conference on Information Communication and Embedded

Systems (ICICES2014) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

6. MAR, Jeich, KUO, Chi-Cheng, LIN, You-Rong, et al. Design of software- defined radio

channel simulator for wireless communications: case study with DSRC and UWB channels.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, vol. 58, no 8, p. 2755-2766.

7. KUKOLEV, P. Comparison of 802.11 a and 802. 11p over fading channels. Elektrorevue,

2013, vol. 4, no 1, p. 7-11.

8. Wijngaarden, P. V. (2011). Frame capture in IEEE 802.11 p vehicul etworks: a simulation-

based approach (Master's thesis, University of Twente).

9. [9 ] PAMUNGKAS, Wahyu et SURYANI, Titiek. Doppler effect in VANE chnology on high

user's mobility. In : 2018 International Conference on Informatio nd Communications

Technology (ICOIACT). IEEE, 2018. p. 899-904