31
Measurement of Concrete Damage Mechanics by Internal Friction and Laser Shearography Richard A. Livingston Materials Science & Engineering Dept University of Maryland 12 th Int. Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials Blacksburg, VA June 23, 2011

Measurement of Concrete Damage Mechanics by Internal … · Measurement of Concrete Damage Mechanics by Internal ... = damping factor or ... It is important to detect very fine cracks

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Measurement of Concrete  Damage Mechanics by Internal 

Friction and Laser Shearography

Richard A. LivingstonMaterials Science & Engineering Dept

University of Maryland 

12th

Int. Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials

Blacksburg, VA June 23, 2011

Co‐Authors, Civil Engineering Dept.

Nicolas McMorris

Cintia

Lijeron

Amde

M. Amde

Jorgemai

Ceesay

Hung Khong

Outline

Introduction

Experimental Approach

Q‐factor Analysis

Shearography

Analysis

Conclusions

Distributed Damage in Concrete•

Characteristic of:–

Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR)

Delayed Ettringite

Formation (DEF)

Freeze‐thaw Damage (F‐T)

Mechanism is the formation of expansive phases:‐

Ettringite

ASR gel

Ice

Results in multiple subvisible

microcracks

Damage is usually measured on laboratory specimens by 

reduction in strength or stiffness

Therefore an NDT method is needed to measure distributed 

damage in the field

Damped Free Oscillator( ) exp( ) cos ou t A t t

where :

u(t) = displacementA

=  amplitude 

α

=  damping factor or internal friction

ωo

=   fundamental frequency in radians per secondt

=  time.   

2o Q

Q‐factor

2 1

o

Q

Experimental Approach

Standard 3”

x 3”

x 11”

concrete prisms

Two types of accelerated damage–

Freeze‐thaw cycles ASTM C 666

Duggan expansion test

Two potassium levels–

Control = 0.56 % K2

O

High Potassium =2.06% K2

O

Duggan Test Water Storage

Test Methods

Ultrasound : ASTM C 215: Fundamental  Transverse Frequency and Quality Factor

Expansion: ASTM C 490

Weight change

Compressive strength

Fracture surface Scanning Electron  Microscopy

Laser shearography

ASTM C 215

Q‐factor for F‐T samples

Q‐factor for DEF samples

All Q vs

Normalized Damage

Q‐factor

2 1

o

Q

Q 2o

12

2

114o Q

Resonant Frequency Dependence on Q

For Q

5, ω

ωo

DEF Specimens, Damping

DEF Specimens, Frequency

ASTM C‐215 Equation for Resonant  Frequency

3

3

* **0.9464* *

E b tfM L c

where: f = resonant frequency, HzE = Dynamic elastic modulusM

= mass of prism, KgL = Length of prism, mb

= Width of prism, mt = Depth of prism, mc = Correction factor, depends on radius of gyration

and Poisson’s ratio

F‐T Specimens, Damping

F‐T Specimens, Frequency

Schematic Diagram of Laser Shearography

Presenter
Presentation Notes
It is important to detect very fine cracks in concrete as early as possible. An NDT method that is being applied to this problem is laser shearography, presented in this slide. Unlike conventional holography which requires two beams of light, shearography employs a single beam of laser light which is reflected off the specimen as shown in this slide. The camera then produces a pair of laterally sheared images in the image plane and hence the method is called shearography. The effect of shearing is to map a point on the image into two points in the image. Conversely, this is equivalent to bringing two separate points on the object surface to meet in the image plane. The two overlapped portions of the sheared images interfere and produce a speckle pattern. When the object is deformed, the speckle pattern is slightly modified. Comparing the two speckle patterns (stressed and unstressed) produces a fringe pattern which depicts the relative displacement of two neighboring points. Since the magnitude of shearing is small, the fringe pattern approximately represents the derivative of displacement with respect to the shearing direction. This differs from holography which depicts displacement rather than its derivative. This difference from holography results in shearography being much less sensitive to external vibration interference and hence much more suitable for production and field environments.

Shearogram

Crack Image Analysis, F-T Control, 100 Days

Crack Detection Segmented Image

Crack Density, Control Crack Density, Hi-K

DEF

Freeze-Thaw

DEF

Freeze-Thaw

Summary,DEF•

DEF does not significantly change internal 

friction

Resonant frequency increases over time  because elastic modulus increases due to  continued concrete curing

Therefore linear resonance spectroscopy is  not feasible as an NDT method for DEF.

Higher potassium levels systematically reduce  elastic modulus

Summary, Freeze‐Thaw•

F‐T damage only weakly increases internal 

friction

F‐T damage significantly affects resonant  frequency

Therefore, resonant frequency rather than Q‐ factor would be an effective basis for NDT

Comparative Damage Mechanics•

F‐T distributed damage develops through 

microcracking

DEF damage involve crystallization of ettringite which fills cracks

Conventional mechanism for distributed damage of  expansive pressure  does not explain DEF damage

Richard A. Livingston: [email protected]

Thank you for your attention!

Presenter
Presentation Notes

2nd

Order Harmonic Ratio2 2

2

22 21 2 ...o

u u uc

t x x

.

co

= constant β2

= second‐order nonlinear coefficient

β2

= A2

/(A1

)2

A1

= Amplitude of fundamental peakA2

= Amplitude of second harmonic peak

Duggan Test Thermal Cycling

Mas

s Lo

ss %

Cycles

Mass Loss for F-T Specimens