647

Naslov 1.5. Snezana.veselinovska_Desktop_Zbornik Savremene Tendencije - Za Autore

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Корисници читача екрана, кликните овде да бисте искључили Google инстант.Пријавите сеGoogleanaliticko sinteticko misljenjeВебСликеМапеВестиВидеоЈошАлатке за претрагуОко 7.630 резултата (0,49 секунде/и) Резултати претрагеLOGIČKE, ANALITIČKE I SINTETIČKE OSNOVE ... - Scribdhttps://sr.scribd.com/.../LOGIČKE-ANALITIČKE-I-SINTETIČKE-OSN...19.07.2012. - Budući da se za generalizaciju, ali i za proces mišljenja vezuje i ...... o pojedinačnom sadrţani su i analitički i sintetički momenti mišljenja.Kriza mišljenja i analitički um | Kali Tribunekalitribune.com/analiticki-um-i-kriza-misljenja/Преведи ову страницу13.04.2014. - Analitički um i kriza mišljenja ..... Prema novijim spoznajama, ove dvije metodološke suprotnosti, analitičko i sintetičko mišljenje, odgovaraju, ...Kant - Sinteticki sudovi a priori - Forum Krstarice - Krstaricaforum.krstarica.com › Forum › Društvo › Filozofija21.01.2009. - Постова: 25 - ‎7 аутораTime smo prosirili svoje znanje a da nismo upotrebili spoljasnje iskustvo, ali to nismo uradili analiticki vec smo sinteticki opazili konstrukcijom ...[PDF]ORGANIZACIJA FUNKCIJA U MOZGUzvu.hr/.../NEUROPSIH_Organizacija%20funkcija...Преведи ову страницуAnalitičko mišljenje i oblikovanje pojmova. (=konceptualizacija) ... Sintetička. Sintetičko mišljenje. Simultano i holističko procesiranje informacija.[PDF]metode učenja – čimbenik uspješnostiwww.hrks.hr/skole/12_ljetna.../17-Prskalo.pdfПреведи ову страницуod I Prskalo - ‎Сродни чланциučenja dijelimo na sintetičku, analitičku i kombiniranu. ... sve pojave u cjelovitom obliku, a onda i zato što su njihove sposobnosti analitičkog mišljenja još.[DOC]Kant - osnovni pojmovi.doc - Filozofijafilozofija.blokovi.com/Kant_-_osnovni_pojmovi.docKant je kategoričke sudove podelio na analitičke i sintetičke. Analitički. Svako telo ima veličinu. Svi momci su neoženjeni. Analizom pojma subjekta, u pojmu ...Kantovi sintetički sudovi a priori - Forum.hrwww.forum.hr › Društvo › FilozofijaПреведи ову страницу19.02.2010. - Постова: 20 - ‎8 аутораUkratko, Kant je razlikovao analitičke i sintetske sudove. I dok su analitički sudovi tautološki jer iskazuju ono što je već sadržano u samom ...Analitičko-sintetički metod definisanja na Vukajliji // Vukajlijavukajlija.com/analiticko-sinteticki-metod-definisanja-na.../203702Metod kojim se neki autori na ovom sajtu služe.U sebi sadrži definisanje pojma i dovođenje u vezi sa srodnim pojmovima,razradu pojma,zanimljive pojedinosti i.Аналитички и синтетички језици - Vokabularwww.vokabular.org › ... › Језик наш насушни13.05.2010. - Постова: 15 - ‎5 аутораОбрнула си: српски је синтетички, енгелски аналитички — што је и логично; да врло упростим, лакше је запамтити: српски синтетише ...[PDF]METODOLOGIJA NAUČNOG RADA - Singipediawww.singipedia.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1625&d...od MI Miljević - ‎22 пута наведен - ‎Сродни чланциproizlazi da je naučni rad, odnosno naučno mišljenje samo jedan, specifičan .... a to su: a) analitičko-sintetička metoda, b) metode apstrakcije i konkretizacije, c).1 2345678910СледећаБеоград - На основу интернет адресе - Користи прецизну локацију - Сазнајте више Помоћ Пошаљите повратне информације Приватност Услови

Citation preview

  • ()

  • .

    .

    .

    . .

    . .

    . .

    . .

    . .

    .

    . .

    .

  • ()

    - -

    , 2014.

  • I

    ()

    . .............................................. 13

    . ................................. 21

    . ............................................................................... 27

    . ................. 41

    . . , . , ........................................................... 55

    . .................................................................................... 67

    . , . ........................................................................ 76

    . () ........................................... 83

    . - , . - ....................... 99

    . - - , , ................................. 109

    . . , . .................. 122

    . .......................................... 142

  • II

    ()

    . 1950- ................................. 155

    . - - ......................................... 160

    . - , ........................... 172

    . ......................... 180

    . .............. 191

    . , . ................................................ 196

    . - ................. 207

    . , .............................................................. 216

    . . ........................... 222

    . , . ................................. 230

    - , - ..................................................... 240

    . .................................................................................. 255

    . ..................... 265

  • . .............................. 277

    . ................................................ 290

    . ..................................................................... 306

    - , - , - .............................................................................. 322

    , . , .

    ........................................ 327

    . ..................... 338

    . , . ,

    .. 348

    c -, - ........................................................ 356

    , Moodle ......364

    III

    -

    George D. Borovas, Ph.D., Maria Eleni Voutsa, Ph.D. The characteristics of education policy of the Bretton Woods institutions . 379

    . .................................... 397

    . * ............................ 403

  • Teodora Valova, Ph.D. Online project-based approach in primary level applying

    the principles of multiple intelligences ........................................................ 414

    . - - , , ................................... 426

    . - - .................... 434

    Rositsa Nedelcheva Todorova, Petya Veselinova Marcheva Hemsball game sports without borders .................................................... 442

    . , ............................. 464

    . ............... 477

    Snezana Stavreva-Veselinovska ICT and competences for the subject natural sciences

    at pedagogical faculties ............................................................................... 487

    ................................... 499

    . , . ................................................................. 505

    . - ............................................................... 520

    . , ................................ 528

    . , ................................................ 541

    M , . - ........... 548

    . .................................. 555

    ......................................... 564

  • .......................................................................... 572

    - ............................................................ 578

    ..................................................................... 588

    , , 3 5,5 ....................... 599

    .................. 604

    . - ................................................................. 612

    . - , . - .............................. 618

    - , ........... 629

    . - , . - ..................................... 638

  • () 6. 12. 2013. , , , - .

  • I

    ()

  • 13

    .

    *

    ?

    :

    - . : , , . . .

    .

    : , , - .

    1.

    - . o , - . , - - . , . , , - -. j , , , , . , , , , . , .

    , , , . , -

    *

  • 14

    , .

    2.

    . , , . , -, . - , web-, , . - -. . , . . ( . ) - . . , . , -, , - .

    -, . - , . . - . - . , - , : . , . () - . .

  • 15

    : , - , - . - , : , - , , - , - , .

    , , , , . () - . . , . 200.000 - ( ) 2 30 - . 17 . , , . - - - ( ) , 10 - - . 1, 2, 3; , . - . - .

    , -, - . - , - . - , . - . . , , , .

    . , , , -, , -

  • 16

    , . , .

    , - , , , , - (Pasi Sahlberg, 2012).

    - ( ) , , , - , . , . - , , , , , -, .

    - , , , - , - .

    , . - . , - , - . . - -, . . , - , .

    . - -. . , , - , .

    -. . -. , . . .

  • 17

    . , , , - . , , . , : .

    . - , , . , -, (. , 2009).

    a

    - , , - , - - , . :

    1. (. -, 2009). , ( -) . , , -, , . , - , 300, - 50 80 . 20 . . , , , . ?

    . . - . (60 ), 40 20, ( ) 10 . . - , . (- ) . , -. , () .

  • 18

    2. , , - . . , , : - ( ) - . , (, , , - ) . , - - . -, . . - - .

    3. - , - (, , , - , - .). , . - -, , (. ). - , (, ).

    - . , (, , ).

    -, , , , :

    - , - ,

  • 19

    - - ,

    - - .

    , . - - . , , - : , , , , , , .

    , - ? .

    - , - , -, ., ?

    , , , , - . , . .

    , , , , - , , , .

    , , , . . .

    () , . - , -. , -, ( , , , -, , - ).

  • 20

    , -- . - - .

    1. , . (2009). . : . : .

    2. , . (1983). . : - ().

    3. , .(1996). , : , 1/1999.

    4. ,. (1996). . : - .

    5. , . (1996). , : .

    6. , . (1996). , , : .

    7. Pasi, S. (2012). . : .

    Stojan Cenic, Ph.D.

    WHAT KIND OF SCHOOL TEACHER-TRAINING FACULTIES PREPARE STUDENTS FOR

    Abstract: The key issue discussed in the development of curricular and ex-

    tracurricular activities of teacher-training faculties is what kind of school they pre-pare future teachers for. This issue brings about another one: what should the school of today be like and are future teachers being prepared at teacher-training faculties for working in schools where children learn for the current and future so-cial, economic, cultural and technical needs. The teaching staff has the most im-portant effect on the profile of primary school. How well a teacher is educated and prepared, such will be the school.

    In this paper the author emphasizes characteristics of quality school in the future and characteristics of developing teaching as basic determinants in further development of curricular and extracurricular activities.

    Keywords: innovative school, developing teaching, developing tea-

    ching models.

  • 21

    .

    *

    : -

    , -- , - . : 21. , ; ; - ; ; (, ) (-); ; , -; ; - / , - . .

    : , , , -

    , . -

    , - .

    , , - , , -- , - , .

    * : , , . 179026, , .

  • 22

    , , - - , . - - , . - . , .

    - ( ); (, .); , , ; -, .

    - . - , (. 1.700 200 , -, , )...

    . - - .

    . , , , .

    . - , , - .

    , , - . - . - - 50 . - , ,

  • 23

    - , !

    , - . - , (. - ).

    (, ) - . - - . , , -, .

    , , . -, .

    - .

    , - , . , , - .

    , - , .

    - - -. , - . , - , , , - .

    , , , , .

    , -, , / ( , , , , , -, ).

  • 24

    - (-, -, -, ).

    , , - (, , , -, , ) , - , , . , , . - .

    - , , - (-) .

    . - , ?

    2020. , , - / . - - , ( ).

    -, .

    - . -/ ? . - / - . .

    , (). , , - - , . - - , .

    .

  • 25

    . - , .

    - , - , . . - .

    , - . - .

    , - , - .

    - . , , - . - , . - -. , , - .

    -/ -, , - -, , . - .

  • 26

    1. ( 76/05, 100/07 , 97/08, 44/10, 93/12, 89/13).

    2. - (2011). : .

    3. 2020. (2012). : , .

    Radmila Nikolic, Ph.D.

    A TEACHER FOR NEW TIMES BUT NOT ONE LOST IN TIME

    Abstract: In the paper, we address some problems encountered by Tea-

    cher training faculties today, which, in spite of the efforts to develop into modern

    scientific and educational institutions that have achieved enviable results in the past two decades of their existence, are in danger of getting out of the framework needed

    by modern teachers for their successful professional work. Those problems can be

    seen in the following: the requirements for 21st century teachers competencies are often such that the essence is lost, what and for whom; there is no consent about the

    common core of the content of study programs; the names of courses are often in discord with the content; fragmenting of content through one-term courses; ten-dencies to exclude courses of scientific disciplines fundamental for teacher trai-ning (pedagogy, sociology) and overemphasizing some other courses (psychologization); the tendency to introduce subject teaching into lower grades of primary school as a complete substitution for the teacher; the unclear role of Teacher training faculties in the concept of lifelong learning, licensing and profe-

    ssional development with the aim of raising competencies; the issue of practice

    rooms; frequent changes to the Higher Education Law in the segment of level of studies and achieving professional/academic title, which poses problems in their

    interpretation and employment of teachers, but mostly in the training of teachers.

    These are only some of the problems which are further discussed in the paper.

    Keywords: teacher, education, professional development, study programs, negative tendencies.

  • 27

    . ,

    : .

    , . , -. . - - . , - . - , , - . - , . XX XXI . , , , - . , .

    : , , -, , .

    . , - . - . ? . - (Wikipedia, 2011). intueri, , , -. , : , , , , , , (Fulgosi, 1981, . 10). ,

  • 28

    , , , (Bem, 2011; Klein, 2003). ... , - (Advanced Learners Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1993, . 476). - -, , , - ? , - . . , , .

    , -, .

    - , -. - "". : , , , ... " , - , " (Gawain, 1997, . 28). . "" . , , , , "", . , . - .

    ? - , , ..., . - -, : , -, .

    , , - . , , . , 1.

  • 29

    1:

    ID

    SUPEREGO

    EGO

    SVIJEST

    PODSVIJEST

    NESVJESNO

    (: Fulgosi, 1981, . 35)

    1 , ,

    . . -

    (-)

    ( -) , -

    -

    .

    , . , ,

    -.

    : -

    , ? , ...?

    ,

    . ,

    "" ,

    .

    - . -

    -

    . -

    ,

    .

  • 30

    2:

    - -: , , ... , -, . , - . - , " "?

    - - . - . . -, -. "" - , -

  • 31

    , , , . - . - , , , (Matijevi, 1994).

    , - . , , , - . -, . . - , - .

    , , . . - "", "" .

    , - , - . , . , - . , . , . . , , , , , .

    . , , . . ; - , , - . , , , . , , . - , , .

  • 32

    (Ceci, 1990). . . . "" - , , (Claxton, 1990; Howe, 1990). , , .

    : " - " (Claxton, 1990, . 55). - , :

    , , " "

    , ,

    (, . 55).

    . . , . (: Hall, 1996, . 168). - , , . "- " , , -. , : , , , . , , , .

    1:

    , , , , , , , , .

    (Hall, 1996, . 182)

  • 33

    - . . - , -, , . , - , . , , - .

    (Maslow, 1963), , -. , , .

    - , , -. , . - , , , , , - . . " , (At-kinson, 1996, . 231).

    - , . . , : , , , , ..., , . , , . -, , , , , - .

    : , - , . , - , " ". , . . , . . .

  • 34

    -

    , ,

    ,

    , ,

    . -

    .

    , -

    , , , -

    , , , ,

    , , , , , .

    , . -

    .

    . -

    , ,

    .

    -

    . -

    t-, 2

    . ,

    -

    , .

    . ,

    . , -

    2050. -

    , -

    2050. .

    .

    : 1)

    2) , -

    (Risti, 1995, . 133).

    , ,

    , -

    , . -

  • 35

    . -

    ,

    , (Bem, 2011).

    - . , - (Lefton, 2000, . 164) . , , - , , - , . (, . 164). : , B, B, C . .

    . - . - . , , .

    -? : , . , . , , - :

    1) ; 2) ,

    ; 3) ; 4) -

    . -

    . - , , .

    , . - . , ,

  • 36

    , . , - , , , - .

    , - (Gidley, Batemen, & Smith, 2004). . - . , - , . - : 1) -, 2) -, 3) 4) S-. : 1) , 2) -, 3) - , 4) 5) (Helmer, 1983, . 20). .

    , - . - ; . - -, . , . , , - (Toffler, 1970, . 440). , - , , .

    . - . , . , (Helmer, 1983, . 103). , - -. - , - . , . - (, 2002). -

  • 37

    . .

    . - , . , . , - . , - . . - (Carter, 2005; Gould, 1999).

    , , a fortiori (Kahn, Brown i Martel, 1976, . 21), . , , . - . , - . - , .

    , -, - . - ( : ) . - , (Hancock, 2009, . 49). , -, ? , , , . . - , - , , . , , (Stewart, 2000, . 107). .

  • 38

    . , - , . . , 2030. 72 (Atali, 2010, . 130). . , - (Toffler, 1981, . 174). - , - , , - -.

    - - . , - - (Stewart, 2000, . 107). , , , . : 1) (Earth-Cente-red) i 2) (Space-bound) - XXI (Kahn, Brown i Martel, 1976, . 20). , - (, . 21), - - (, . 21). - .

    -. . , . - , . -, . , . - . - , , . , , (Toffler, 1981, . 4), , - . ,

  • 39

    , , -. , .

    ? . - . - , . - , . .

    . - 1993. 776 . XXI ( : Hancock, 2009, . 113). XXI (entertainment) - .

    1. Advanced Learners Encyclopedic Dictionary (1993). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    2. Atali, . (2010). Kratka istorija budunosti. Beograd: Arhipelag. 3. Atkinson, T. (1996). Home thoughts from abroad. In: G. Claxton, T. Atkinson,

    M. Osborn, and M. Wallace, (eds.). Liberating the Learner (124143). London and New York: Routledge.

    4. Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous re-troactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 100(3), 407425.

    5. Carter, J. (2005). Our endangered values: America's moral crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    6. Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence... more or less: A bio-ecological theory of in-tellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    7. Claxton, G. (1990). Teaching to learn: A direction for education. London: Cassell. 8. Fulgosi, A. (1981). Psihologija linosti: Teorije i istraivanja. Zagreb: kolska knjiga. 9. Gawain. S. (1997). iveti u svetlosti. Beograd: Press Tomi Book. 10. Gidley, J. M., Batemen, D., & Smith, C. (2004). Futures in education: Princi-

    ples, practice and potential. Melbourne, Australia: Swinburne universuty of Technology.

    11. Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine.

    12. Hall, V. (1996). When the going gets through Learning through a taught dictora-te programe. In: G. Claxton, T. Atkinson, M. Osborn, and M. Wallace, (eds.). Li-berating the Learner (161183). London and New York: Routledge.

  • 40

    13. Hancock, P. A. (2009). Mind, machine and morality: Toward a philosophy of human-technology symbols. Farnham, GB: Ashgate.

    14. Helmer, O. (1983). Looking forward: A guide to futures research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

    15. Howe, M. J. A. (1990). Does intelligence exist? The Psychologist, 3, 490-493. 16. Kahn, H., Brown, W. i Martel, L. (1976). Slijedeih 200 godina. Zagreb: Stvarnost. 17. Klein, G. (2003). Intuition At Work., New York: Random House. 18. Lefton, L. A. (2000). Psychology, 7

    th ed. Boston, MA: Allyin and Bacon.

    19. Maslow, A. H. (1963). Self-actualizing people. In J. B. Levitas (Ed.). The world of psychology. New York: Braziller.

    20. Matijevi, M. (1994). Humor u nastavi. Zagreb: UNA-MTV. 21. Risti, . (1995). O istraivanju i metodu znanja. Beograd: Institut za pedagoka

    istraivanja. 22. Stewart, J. (2000). Evolution's arrow: The direction of evolution and the future

    of humanity. Canberra: The Chapman Press. 23. , . (2002). : -

    . . 4, . 324339. 24. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Bantam Books. 25. Toffler, A. (1981). Future shock: The third wave. New York: Bantam Books. 26. Wikipedia (2011). Tehne. 11.05.2011. : http://en.wikipe-

    dia.org/wiki/Techne.

    Nenad Suzic, Ph.D.

    FUTURISTIC COGNITION Abstract: Futurology is a relatively new scientific discipline. The question

    of why futurology has not been constituted yet, author is discussing here by a num-ber of angles. One of the reasons is that intuition which until yesterday was not re-cognized as a source of scientific knowledge, was considered unscientific by many known authorities. The concept of intuition is considerably changed nowadays. In this paper the author presents a variety of reasons and examples to suggest that in-tuition is indispensable in scientific knowledge, and that it is necessary as wel as possible, to encourage it in teaching process from the first day of school. In addi-tion, the paper goes on to define the term methodology of futurology, whic shows that futurology is an integral part of all sciences. Existing curricula can be implemen-ted by futurological means which requires a new teaching methodology as wel as new and different teaching styles in the classroom. The curriculum of teacher education faculties by passes training of teachers in futurology cognition, or learning how to le-arn. Teachers are still preparing children for life in the twentieth rather thantwenty-first century. Teachers need to be prepared for mounting components of learning how to learn, futurological cognition, and for inductive, not just deductive knowledge. Is the author of this text wrong or right, a real future will merci lessly confirm or deny.

    Keywords: intuition, futurology, methodology of futurology, futurological

    scientific method, learning to learn.

  • 41

    . ,

    : , -

    , - , . - - . () ( -- ) - - . , , - .

    : , , -

    , , .

    1.

    , , - ( ) , , , - , , .

    ,

    -

    ,

    , -

    .

    ,

    , (, ,

    , -...) -

    . , -

    , .

    .

  • 42

    ,

    . (-

    , ) ( -

    ,

    ) -

    , -

    - , -

    .

    ,

    , .

    2.

    -

    .

    -

    , -

    /

    .

    ,

    , -

    -

    - , -

    .

    , -

    . .

    ()

    . -

    .

    -

    212 50 () -

    =0,87.

  • 43

    3.

    - . 1 -, (-, , ...), (, -, ...) ( - ) :

    ) : 10% (, ECTS), ) : 30% ( ECTS) ) : 10% (, ECTS).

    - (1. , 2. 3. ), . - .

    1.

    % % %

    1. 5 10,87 11 23,91 30 65,22

    2. 6 13,63 9 20,45 29 65,92

    3. 5 13,53 10 27,02 22 59,45

    4. 5 10,87 10 21,75 31 67,39

    5. 3 8,34 6 16,66 27 75,00

    6.

    5 9,62 10 19,23 37 71,15

    7. 5 10,64 13 27,65 29 61,71

    8. 5 11,11 8 17,78 32 71,11

    39 11,04 77 21,82 237 67,14

    1 ( ) (. ). , - . . , , , . . . , - . (, ).

  • 44

    , 1.

    1. ,

    - (10%), (30%) - (60%) -, - (2) . (2) 2 (2=11,15; d=2; Sig=0,00), - - .

    2. ,

    39 77 237

    35,3 105,9 211

    2=11,15; Sig=0,00; 2=9,21

    11,04%

    21,82%

    67,14%

    0,00%

    10,00%

    20,00%

    30,00%

    40,00%

    50,00%

    60,00%

    70,00%

    80,00%

  • 45

    1 - (. 60% ). , - (ECTS).

    - , .

    3. (master)

    % % %

    1. 1 25 1 25 2 50

    2. 3 42,86 1 14,28 3 42,86

    3. 1 14,28 2 28,57 4 57,86

    4. 2 28,57 2 28,57 3 42,86

    5. 1 25 1 25 2 50

    6. -

    2 33,33 2 33,33 2 33,33

    7. 2 22,22 3 33,34 4 44,44

    8. 2 33,33 1 16,67 3 50

    14 27,45 14 27,45 23 45,10

    3 - () - . , ( 10% , 27,45%), .

    2. , ()

    45,10%

    27,45%

    27,45%

  • 46

    . (, , , , -...) , , , (, , , ...) . , , - . .

    - / - . 4 - / , , -, (t=0,87; Sig=0,39). . -, / - .

    4.

    N

    t-

    212 27,28 4,12 0,87 0,39

    / 50 26,00 4,84 -

    /-. , , -, , /. - . , - . - - / - - , , , , , , , - .

    - /-. , -

  • 47

    . -/ , , , . -- (/-) .

    5.

    N

    t-

    212 29,55 7,73 0,26 0,80

    / 50 29,17 7,51

    / , . - 6 / . - , , - . - , .

    6. ,

    N

    t-

    212 19,08 5,59 -1,50 0,14

    / 50 20,33 4,06

    (20,1%) - (49,5%) (/) - , , - . (2=184,608; Sig=0,00) (7,9%), (23,8%) - (, 2011).

    , , . , 60-70% ( , , ECTS...), . /- ( - ) ,

  • 48

    ( ) , -, , - - , - . , . -, , , , - , , - ( ) - -, .

    : - -

    ; -

    - ; - ,

    ; - - -

    , - - ;

    - - /- - - - , .

    : - -

    - , , -;

    - - - , - - , - ;

    - , , ;

    - , -, , -, , , -, , .

  • 49

    4.

    , (-, , , ) 30% (, ECTS)2 - , -. , - (, ). .

    - - - - - , .

    16,3% 9,9% , - . 36,11% 8,6% . (33,7%) (36,6%) -, , .

    (39,6%), - () - , , . -, , , -, -. 36,1% 45,5% . , 23,3% - (21, 8%) - .

    , . -- . -

    2 (, ) , (2+1 ). .

  • 50

    , . (, 2012, . 62) () - .

    5.

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    )

    23,5 47,2 24,6 3,5 1,1 24,08 0,00

    45,5 37,4 12,1 5,1 -

    )

    12,9 43,8 30,7 10,7 1,9 12,41 0,02

    28,4 34,7 23,8 14,9 2,0

    )

    4,12 23,6 43,6 26,0 2,8 18,95 0,00

    11,0 33,0 35,0 15,0 6,0

    )

    12,5 35,3 31,2 17,6 3,4 2,87 0,58

    17,0 31,0 27,0 21,0 4,0

    ) 11,8 30,5 31,6 21,6 4,5

    1,05 0,90 10,9 29,7 28,7 24,8 5,9

    )

    5,8 30,5 37,9 21,1 4,7

    14,12 0,01 15,0 24,0 29,0 26,0 6,0

    )

    9,9 29,5 36,4 18,2 6,0 8,97 0,06

    18,8 28,7 28,7 14,9 8,9

    ) 7,5 28,8 30,5 26,0 7,1

    6,78 0,15 11,9 22,8 36,6 18,8 9,9

    ) 8,8 27,6 30,8 25,4 7,3

    4,91 0,30 14,9 26,7 27,7 26,7 4,0

    , (70,7%), (82,9%) - . - , (63,1%), (56,7%). - . (, -) , , , , .

  • 51

    (26,0%) (15,0) . - - , , - . - - , , - , , (, . 63).

    - , .

    - , , - , , -, , , . - :

    - , - , - , , ;

    - , -- - , , - , , , -, - ;

    - - - , ( -, 2011, . 63) , - .

  • 52

    - :

    - , -/ - /;

    - ; - -

    , - - , , - - .

    - :

    - , - , , -

    , - -

    , -

    - . -

    , .

    5.

    -, . - , , .

    - ( ) :

    1. , , - - - ( ) - ) 10% , ) 30% ) 60% .

  • 53

    2. -- , - , - , , , - - .

    3. ( ) - .

    1. Amstrong, T. (2008). Najbolje kole: kako istraivanje razvoja ovjeka moe usmjervati pedagoku praksu. Zageb: Educa.

    2. , . (2000). - . : , . 3-4, . 51-68.

    3. Winkel, R. (1980). Die kritische komunikative Didaktic. Westermanns. Pad. Beritage 32, 5.

    4. , . (2003). . . : .

    5. , . (2009). - . . : - , . 235-247.

    6. , . (2010). . - : , . 274-282.

    7. , . (2011). - . - ( ). : -, . 353-364.

    8. , . (2011). . . : , . 9-44.

    9. , . (2011). . -: : - .

    10. , . (2011). , - . : , . 8, . 81-99.

  • 54

    11. , . , . (2013). - . - . : .

    12. , . (2011). - . : .

    13. Klafki, W. (1980). Die bildungstheoretishe Didaktic. Westermanns. Pad. Beri-tage 32, 1.

    14. Howard, J. (2007). Curriculum Devalopment. Department of Education. Elon University.

    15. www.uf.bg.ac.rs 22.11.2013. 16. www.ucfak.ni.ac.rs 20.11.2013. 17. www.pef.uns.ac.rs 23.11.2013. 18. www.pefja.kg.ac.rs 24.11.2013. 19. www.uf-pz.net 24.11.2013. 20. www.ff.unibl.org 24.11.2013. 21. www.pfb.unssa.rs.ba 22.11.2013.

    Mile Ili, Ph.D.

    SCIENTIZATION AND PRESERVATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL-

    PEDAGOGICAL CHARACTER OF TEACHER EDUCATION STUDIES

    Abstract: Scientization tendencies, rather than those preserving the

    psychological-pedagogical character, of the concept, structure and content of the first, second and third cycle studies of teacher education, particularly at certain

    colleges, are becoming more and more prominent. Under pressure from individuals

    and groups of teachers the segments of the teaching programs of study are beco-ming similar to the parts of the study programs of the Faculties with tangent

    systems disciplines. Unbalanced structure of the (eclectic) study programs and their

    realization (mostly lecturing and reproductive-verbose) neglects the key final pro-fessional competences of future teachers and researchers of educational processes

    in an innovative and effective classroom instruction. This may produce a negative effect on the quality of the processes and outcomes of educational work, especially

    the child-rearing responsibility of teachers.

    Keywords: Teacher Education, scientization, preservation of psychological-

    pedagogical character, study program, future teachers professional competences.

  • 55

    . . ,

    . ,

    ,

    : , . ,

    - - . - , , - . , , . 20. 21. , , , - , - , , . , , - - .

    , - . , - , , - .

    : , , , ,

    .

    -, . - . - , ,

  • 56

    , . , .

    - . , . , . , - - . -. - - , - , .

    . . , , 23. - 1844. , . 22 : - , . - (, 1970: 30). 1870. (, 1974: 404). - , . - , , (27. ) 1871. - (). , -, 1877. . , 1896. - 25. .

    . , 1. 1778. , - (, 2009: 271). , -

  • 57

    , , , (). 1812, , -, , . 1815. , - , 1816. , - , 1973. .

    - -. 19. . 1836. (, 1971: 32). (), - - - , , - , . 1844. , - (: 33). -, - , , - - , , , , . , .

    19. , - , - . - , . -, : - , -- (: 43-44). 19. - - , , , , , , .

    19. . , , -

  • 58

    , . -, , (, 1957: 53). , , , , , , . , - , , , , - .

    , . - . - ( : 49/93), , , , , - , , , .

    - . , -- . - :

    - , - , - ( -

    ), - () , - () , - (

    ), - , - , - , - , - , - ,

  • 59

    - , - , - , - , - , - , - , - , - - - . -

    - -. , , - , - , , - .

    (, , , , , , -, ) , , - - , . - , , (, 2013: 634). :

    - - ,

    - , - ( -

    , ), - , - , - -

    (, , , 2011: 18). -

    - , - .

  • 60

    , , , - .

    , , -

    , - . , , . , . - , - 1999. 19. . - :

    - ,

    - ( , -),

    -

    - () .

    , , - , . - . () , () . , , - , -, - .

    - 50- . 2003. , - , - , 2003/2004. . , , -

  • 61

    . , 2008. , , 1993. (, 2013: 636). - , - (, , ) ( ) . , -. , - . :

    - ,

    - ,

    - -

    - .

    , - , , :

    - -

    - (- ), .

    - 2013. 2014. , - , . , - () (- ).

  • 62

    - (, , ) ( ) - , - , 1, 2 3.

    . 1.

    -

    57 56 47 56 52 49

    . 2.

    -

    .

    1 14 13 9 13 13 13

    2 15 14 13 12 14 13

    3 17 13 13 16 14 12

    4 11 16 12 15 11 11

    . 3.

    -

    1 2 2 2 2 2 1

    2 2 4 6 5 2 1

    3 12 5 10 12 11 7

    4 7 12 8 9 7 9

    23 23 26 30 22 18

  • 63

    . , , - . , , - (, , 2011: , 2013), - . , , - , , . . , ( - ) ( 15% ). - , . - , , , , - (). - 18 30 - - . , - , - . , . -. , , - , - . , - - , 2+1, - . , - , , - . - , ,

  • 64

    . , , - - (, 2013: 642).

    , - - . , . . - (2003: 40), - , , - . :

    - , - , - -

    , -

    , , - .

    , - . , :

    - , - , - - - -

    , - - .

    . - - . . , . - - , . , - , .

  • 65

    , - , - .

    - . , . , - . - 2008. , . - , . , () , - . - , , - .

    1. , . (2013), , , . 2. , . 631-645.

    2. , ., , . (2011). -: , -, . 4, , . 651-653.

    3. -, . (2003), - , , . 2-3, , . 39-52

    4. : 49/93 5. , .. (2009).

    (XVIII- ) - , -: , . 267-297.

    6. , ., , ., , . (2011), -, , . 25 (1/2011), , . 11-23.

    7. , . (1974). (1830-1878). -: .

    8. , . (1971). 19. , : .

  • 66

    Radenko S. Krulj, Ph.D.

    Zvezdan Arsic, Ph.D.

    Jelena Krulj Draskovic, M.A.

    CONSISTENCY OF SYLLABUSES OF TEACHER TRAINING FACULTIES

    IN THE FUNCTION OF STUDENT MOBILITY

    Abstract: In lower grades of primary school, i.e. in class teaching, tea-

    chers are those who carry out most of teaching activities and the ones who have the

    greatest responsibility for the success of educational-pedagogical work with pupils. Modern society is characterized by numerous changes in the social, scientific, tech-

    nical, and technological sphere, the consequence of which is a change in the role

    and objectives of school, which are constantly being redefined. Therefore, the edu-

    cation of teachers should be conceived in such a way that it enables teachers to suc-

    ceed in the realization of pedagogical, educational, and functional objectives of teaching. At the turn of 20th to 21st century, and especially with the Bologna

    Process, activities in the domain of teacher training were largely directed towards

    the development of a uniform model of professional education of teachers, which would be based on achieving competences, that is, developing abilities to master

    the profession, scientific disciplines, and pedagogical methodology. Apart from that, a uniform model of teacher training is also based on developing abilities to es-

    tablish a relationship and efficient communication with pupils, but also with other

    factors who participate in the organization and realization of educational-pedago-gical work in and outside school in any way.

    A uniform model of teacher training presupposes the consistency of syllabuses of Teacher training faculties, which is the most important condition for

    student mobility. For that reason, in the paper we focus on examining and analy-

    zing the consistency of syllabuses of Teacher training faculties in our country, ac-cording to the parameters related to the total number of courses in study programs,

    the number of courses per year of studying, and the degree to which pedagogical

    disciplines are represented in them.

    Keywords: syllabus, students, teachers, competences, abilities.

  • 67

    .

    : -

    , - - . , , - . , - , , , , - . , .

    : , ,

    , , .

    , . - , - , .

    -

    , - - . -, . , , , - . , , - , . , , .

  • 68

    , - , , . - , . - , . , -, , , ( . 2009).

    , - - -, . , - , , - , , .

    , , - , , - , , - , . , . , - -, , - (, . ., 2007).

    , , , , . - - , .

    - , , , 20. 21. -. , - - - .

    - , . , , , .

  • 69

    - - - , - , . , - , , , , , - , . , , , - , , , .

    . , , - , , . , - . , , , , , - .

    , -. , - , - . , , , . - - . , - , , . , - . . Marshall Plam, (Gore, ., 1993).

    - , , , , , , , - - .

  • 70

    , -, . - , - , , . , - , - (Wil-liams and Herita: e, 1988).

    , - , , - , , . , - - .

    , , . , -, , - , - . , , - , , , . - - - , , , .

    , -, , , , , . , , , - . , , , . ? , .

    , - ,

  • 71

    . , - (Poustman, 1987) - . - , . , , - . , , - , , . . , , . . , -, , - , -, .

    , , , , . - , , , , , . . , -, , , - , , , , .

    , , . - . . -. . , . , - . . , , , .

    . , - , . , - , -

  • 72

    . -, , , - .

    , - . -, .

    1994. - 174 , - (Collis and de Vries, 1994). , .

    , . - , , , . . , - (, . ., 2013).

    - . , - , ( ) , . , - - , , , . - , - .

    , -, , , , .

    , , - , , , , . - , 1811-1816. , . , - , . - - -, .

  • 73

    , , . - , . , -, , 150-250 , - , . - , , , - . , - .

    -, - , . , - , - . . , , - . , - . , - , , , , , .

    - , , . . , , . , , .

    , , , . - , .

  • 74

    , , . - , , -, .

    , , . - , , . , - . , - .

    , , . , -- , - , , , . , , - , , , , .

    , , , , - , , - . -, .

    - , - , , - .

    1. Albrow, M. (1996): The Impast of Globalization on Sociological Concerts: Commnunity, Culture and Milieu, u Eade J. (ed.) Living in the Global Sity, Ro-tlendge, New York-London.

    2. Albrov, M. (1996): The Global Age, Polity; Camridge. 3. , . (2002): .

    , . 112-113, .

  • 75

    4. (2003) : , , .

    5. , . (2001): , , . 6. Bauman, Z. (1998): Globalization, Polizy Press, Cambridge. 7. (2007): , . 8. , . (2009): , -

    . -, .

    9. , . (2009): , , . 5, , .

    10. , . (1998): , . 11. . . (2006): ,

    , , , . 1/2006. 12. , . . . ( ) (2006): -

    , , . , . -

    13. , . . (2005): ( ). - 5, .

    14. , . . (2007): . 2, .

    15. , . (2007): . - , . 7-8-.

    16. Phillip, V. Jones (1998): Globalization and Internationalism: Democratic Pro-spectsfor World Comparative Education, Volume 34, 2, 1998, pp. 143155.

    17. , . (2000): , , . 18. , . (1997): , , . 19. Bauman, Z. (1998): Globalizacion, Polity Press, Cambrigde.

    Bora Stanimirovic, Ph.D

    THE INFLUENCE OF GLOBALIZATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES ON EDUCATIONAL PROCESS

    Abstract: Globalization can be considered from various aspects and be

    defined as a contemporary social phenomenon expressed in different forms which influence the changes in all dimensions of life on planetary level. Globalization is one of the most popular issues nowadays, multidimensional and contradictory phe-nomenon, with all its positive and negative characteristics. Accordingly, no matter how hard we try to justify its advantages, we have to point to its faults as well, not on-ly in the field of economy, politics, culture, but in the whole educational process. This paper presents the most important characteristics of the idea of globalization, infor-mation technologies and educational process in context of their interdependence.

    Keywords: globalization, information technologies, educational process,

    changes, school.

  • 76

    . .

    : -

    , , -. . - , , - . - , -, . .

    : , , .

    , - . , - . - , (- 2000, ISATT, ECER ) - , , - .

    , - : , , , , , , , - . -

  • 77

    , , , , . , , . . , (-, 1999). - .

    - , . , -, . , - ( , 2006:340). - .

    , -

    . , - . . , , , , (, 2010: 68). - . - , (-, 2006). . - , - , , , . - - (, 2010: 72). , , - . - (Hercog, 2006; Harris, 2000).

  • 78

    , - . , . , , - , . -- . , - - -- (, 2008: 64).

    - . -: ( , ), - (- -, , , ), , ( ), -- (, , 2010: 154-155). , , .

    - -, , . - -- .

    - , , - . .

    - -. - , (, 2003: 221). , , -

  • 79

    - , , - - (, 1999; , 1999).

    , , ( , 2002: 12). - . - , - , , .

    -. -, . , -- =2,28, =2,41, - ( ., 2005: 98). - - , - (-, 2013: 324). - - , , - ( ., 2012).

    , , - ( ; - , ). - .

    , . , - . , , - . , - , .

    - .

  • 80

    , , . -, , - - , . , , . - - , , , (, 2003: 211).

    - . , , - , . , - - . - -, . ( , , -, ). - - (, 2003: 229).

    , -. , - . - , , -. - - , , , . - , , , -, .

    - , -. , , - ,

  • 81

    , . - , . - , , - .

    1. , . , . (2010): - , : .

    2. , . (2006): , : , : , . 3, 87-103.

    3. , . , . (2002): , : - .

    4. , ., , . , . (2012): - , , : , . 14, 99-108.

    5. , . , . (2006): -- , : , : , 337-348.

    6. , . (2005): , : - - , : , 571-583.

    7. , . (2003): , : , : - , 221-236.

    8. , . (2013): , : - , : , 314-332.

    9. Mui, V. (1999): Uvod u metodologiju istraivanja odgoja i obrazovanja. Za-greb: EDUCA.

    10. Pavin, T. I sar. (2005): Percepcija kvalitete obrazovanja uitelja i nastavnika i nekih aspekata uitljske i nastavnike profesije iz perspektive osnovnokolskih uitelja i nastavnika, u: Cjeloivotno obrazovanje uitelja i nastavnika: vie-struke perspektive, Zagreb: Institut za drutvena istraivanja u Zagrebu, 95-124.

    11. , . (1999): , : - .

    12. , . (2008): - , : , : , 197-204.

  • 82

    13. , . (2010): -, : , -: , . 63-84.

    14. , . (2008): - , , . 21, 1, 61-69.

    15. Harris, A. (2002): School improvement: What,s in it for Schools?, London: Routled-

    ge, : http://www.questia.com/oitano: : 12. 01. 2008.

    Milenko Kundacina, Ph.D.

    Jelena Stamatovic, Ph.D.

    METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCIES OF FUTURE TEACHERS

    AND THE NEEDS OF CONTEMPORARY SCHOOL

    Abstract: Modern roles of teachers create the need for a more qualitative

    approach to education and professional development of teachers, which has to be based on scientific knowledge, research and relevant experience. Therefore, those

    who educate future teachers have great responsibility in the development of their

    competencies. The paper discusses the need of modern school for knowledge, skills, habits and abilities of future teachers in the field of research of pedagogical prac-

    tice. Reform changes of primary school are followed by a series of activities requi-ring teachers engagement, which include their mastery in projecting and perfor-ming different forms of research, as well as the capacity to follow literature of

    empirical character. This paper is an attempt to determine to what extent the needs and demands in contemporary school correspond to methodological competencies

    of future teachers.

    Keywords: methodological competencies of teachers, research competen-

    cies of teachers, contemporary school.

  • 83

    . ,

    ()

    : -

    , , . , : - , , - . . -, . - , , . , . , - . .

    : , , , , .

    - . , - - - . - : , , , , ( , 2004), - . - () . - , , . , .

  • 84

    - . , 1993. , 2002. 2004. . , - , : , , - . - - (,2005:358). , - . .

    , - , - . , - - . , - . - . : (,1991:176). - , , - . - : 2002. : : -; 2004. : , : - . 2003. , .

    , - . , - . - , . , -, . . , , -

  • 85

    , . , . , - . ... - ..., ... ... - , . (, 2008:110). - , .

    , - , . - , - . -, , . , , - . - , , . , . , , , - . , - . , -, ( ), - . . , , , . -, (, 2008: 116). , , - , - - , . , , - , .

  • 86

    - - , . .

    - . , , - . , , . , . , . . - , , -. - . , .

    . , . - , . -, , . -, - . , - , . , , - . , . - , . - . - . , . ? ,

  • 87

    , . , , - . (, 2008: 89). , . , : , , -, .

    , . , . - - . - . - . - , . - , . - -- .

    (, 2009: 100), . - , . , - , . , . , , , . - .

  • 88

    , , . , - . -, . , . - , . - , . , . , , . , . - , - .

    , , . , - , , - . , . : . . , , . . - .

    . - . - . - . - , - -

  • 89

    . , - . - , , - . , . , - . , -, , . . , . , , . , - , .

    . - , . -, (, , 1389...). , -, - . , . , - , . , - . - . , -, ... (-) , ..., , ... -

  • 90

    , , , -, ... (, 2011: 91-96). , .

    . - . , -. ... , , -. ... (,1994:49) , - , -. , . , . - - .

    . , , . , , . - , . , - . - . , , , , . , , . .

    - . , -

  • 91

    . - , , -. , - . . -. - (, 2005: 91). , . , - , , , , . -, . - , , - .

    , - - . , - . - - , . , . , . - , - . : , 9. ; 1966. , 18. ; -, 12. , , 8. , . - , -

  • 92

    ... ( . 1 ). , - . - , - , .

    , , -. , , -, , , . - . , . - , , - -. , -. - , -. , . , , . -- - . -, . - .

    , , . , . , - . , , .

  • 93

    , - -. , -, , . , , , .

    - . , - . (, 2004: 200), - - , 20. , - . , - , . - - , (, 2007: 67). , . . - , . - , , - . . -- - . . , . - , - . , , -, . . - , - .

  • 94

    - , , : , , . -, . - , , - . , - . - , . , . - - . , -- . - , . , - .

    , . , . - , -. - , . : () (.20:26). - , . , -, - , . , - , . , , , -

  • 95

    . , - . , , . , . , , - ,

    : , , - . - , , - . - , . - . , - . , , , . , - . , - . - - , . .

    - - . . , , . . , , . , , - . -,

  • 96

    . , , . , , -, . -, , - .

    - . - . , , - . , , - , . , -. , - . , - . - , . , . , - , . - , . , . , . : - , . , , , - .

  • 97

    1. (2010). . . 2. , ., (2011): ?. . . 3. (2004): .

    . . .

    4. , ., (2009): . . .

    5. , ., (2006): . . .

    6. , ., (2003): . . . 7. Casanova, J., (1994): Public Religion in the Modern World. University of

    Chicago Press. Chichago.

    8. , ., (2005): . . . 9. , ., (2012): . . . 10. (2009): -

    . .

    11. , ., (2005): - ; ; - - . : , . . .

    12. , ., (2008): . . 13. , ., (2011): . -

    . .

    14. , ., (2008): , . -. .

    15. , ., (2013): . . .

    16. , ., (2007): . - . .

    17. , ., (1994): . -. .

  • 98

    Ljubivoje Stojanovic, Ph.D.

    RELIGIOUS CONTENTS IN TEACHING AT TEACHER-TRAINING

    (PEDAGOGICAL) FACULTIES

    Abstract: The study of the religious content in higher educational instituti-

    ons, which train teachers, it is important and necessary. The reasons for this are many, can be kept to a few basic: multidisciplinary school system, multi-ethnic,

    multi-denominational and multi-cultural environment. Schools as an educational

    factor is where it properly conceived culture of competition and culture of dialogue. Teachers, teachers and teachers as designers of educational progression should have

    at least basic information about religious and facilities. It does not imply an obliga-tion of membership at any cost, to any religious system, but requires a high degree of

    tolerance. Then, belonging or not belonging to a religiouscollectivity neither nuisance nor a privilege. The responsibility here is a measure that encourages all the good

    correlation, and the school system issuccessful as much as you can establish a good correlation. Enlightenment function of school is so designed and thought out.

    Keywords: religious contents, education, multidisciplinary, multi confessio-nality, enlightment.

  • 99

    . - . - ,

    : -

    , -, . o , .

    - -, , - .

    : , , , - , .

    1.

    1.1. .

    - . , -, . .1

    (2007)2 - , , , , -

    1 Robbie Mc J., TEACHER DEVELOPMENT:Policies that Make Sense, SanFrancisko: West Ed,

    Retrieved April 26, 2013 from: http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/teacher_dev/TeacherDev.pdf 2 European Commission Improving the Quality of Teacher Education, Brussels, 2007

  • 100

    . (2005)3 - , . , - , , .

    , , , , .

    , , -. , . . :

    - .

    - - - .

    - (/) . ,

    -, -, , . , - .

    1.2.

    - - - .

    - () - , .

    3 OECD Teachers Matter, Paris, 2005

  • 101

    - , .

    - - .

    - , . , .

    2.

    2.1. : -

    - .

    2.2. :

    - -, .

    2.3. : :

    - - .

    - - .

    - .

    2.4. : -

    , .

  • 102

    2.5. . -

    .

    2.6. : : -

    , , - .

    - . 1 8 - , .

    ) , , , .

    1.

    (8)

    2 2+2+2

    1 3 2+2+1

    3 2+2+1

    3 1+1+1

    3 1+1+1

    3 1+1+1

    2 4 2+2+1

    4 1+1+1

    4 1+1+1

    4 1+1+1

    4 1+1+1

    5 2+2+2

    5 1+1+1

    5 1+1+1

    5 1+1+1

    7 1+1+1

    7 1+1+1

    8 1+1+1

    8 1+1+1

    8 1+1+1

  • 103

    2.

    (6 )

    1 2+2+1

    2 2+2+1

    5 1+1+1

    6 1+1+1

    1 2+2+1

    4 1+1+1

    2 2+2+1

    6 1+1+1

    3 1+1+1

    6 1+1+1

    4 1+1+1

    4 1+1+1

    3 1+1+1

    5 1+1+1

    6 1+1+1

    6 1+1+1

    5 1+1+1

    , 2 .

    3.

    (8 )

    3 4+2

    3 4+2

    4 3+2

    2 2+2

    3 2+2

    4 2+2

    6 3+2

    2 2+2

    6 2+2

    3 2+2

  • 104

    4.

    (8 )

    2 4+2

    2 2+2

    4 3+2

    3 3+2

    4 2+2

    6 2+2

    5 3+2

    2 2+2

    6 2+2

    6 2+2

    -

    7 2+2

    4 .

    5.

    (8 )

    2 3+2

    4 3+2

    5 3+2

    7 3+1

    4 3+1

    6.

    (8 )

    2 3+2

    3 3+2

    4 3+1

    5 3+2

    7 3+1

    6 3+1

  • 105

    7.

    (8 )

    5 27 4 20 5 26 6 29 3 15 3 15

    15 45 13 39 5 20 5 20 2 8 3 12

    20 72 17 59 10 46 11 49 5 23 5 27

    8 - , . , .

    8.

    4 (8 )

    2 3+2 1 3+2=5

    4 2+1 1 2+1=3

    , :

    1. - , - .

    2. - .

    3. - - .

    4. - .

    5. - -

    6. - , - .

    4 , .

  • 106

    ) -

    -. - , 50521. , , , - .

    - - , : -; -; ; - ; .

    , - - - :

    - . - . - -

    -.

    - - .

    - .

  • 107

    1. . 35 14.03.2008, , 15, 2013 http://www.edulaws.mk/images/pdf/zakon_za_viso-ko.pdf.

    2. . (2001). - ( ), : .

    3. Improving the Quality of Teacher Education (2007). Brussels: European Com-mission.

    4. 21 (2009). : , .

    5. . , - , 2011/2012, 21, 2012 http://pfsko.ukim.edu.mk.

    6. . , - 2011/2012, 21, 2012 http://pfsko.ukim.edu.mk.

    7. , , - .

    8. , , .

    9. Robbie Mc J. , TEACHER DEVELOPMENT:Policies that Make Sense, San-Francisko: West Ed, Retrieved April 26, 2013 from: http://www.wested.org/on-

    line_pubs/teacher_dev/TeacherDev.pdf.

    10. 103 30 2010, - - , ( . 2).

    11. , , 2011/2012, 20, 2013 http://www.ugd.edu.mk/index.php/mk/fakulteti/pf.

    12. , , 2011/2012, 20, 2013 http://www.ugd.edu.mk/index.php/mk/fakulteti/pf.

  • 108

    Dean Iliev, Ph.D.

    Tatjana Atanasoska, Ph.D.

    THE INTERPRETATION OF PEDAGOGICAL DISCIPLINES

    AT PEDAGOGICAL FACULTIES IN THE LIGHT OF FRASCATIS CLASSIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC FIELDS

    Abstract: Pedagogical faculties in a modern integrated university must be

    more adaptable, accepting the challenges posed by globalization, but also more creative in designing professional development and lifelong learning of teachers at

    all levels. In that sense, the introduction of Frascatis classification of scientific fields was supposed to make study programs at Faculties of Pedagogy more peda-

    gogical, methodological and professional.

    For this occasion, we present the results of one of our comparative resear-ches of study programs at Faculties of Pedagogy in Macedonia, which show that

    the process of depedagogization has just happened, and the processes of personali-zation and differentiation of solutions to the advantage of substrative bases of tea-

    ching profession and guiding structures.

    Keywords: pedagogy, didactics, depedagogization, Frascatis classifica-tion, lifelong education.

  • 109

    . - - , ,

    , , : , ,

    . , , -, , , 21- .

    : , , -, .

    XXI -, - . -, , -, , .....

    .

    . , 1945 , , : , - , - , , 1995/96. (, ., 2000).

    . - : , , - , .

    (. , 2008) , - - - .

  • 110

    1993 - , - , . , -, , .

    - - , . - , , , .

    , - , - , .. , - , , . , - - .

    . , - ,. , - ( ) - - ( , .35/2008).

    - (, , , , , , .. - , -,(), - - , . (-, 2010:57)

    - . ( , ..) - . , , , , . (Domovic, V., 2009:20)

  • 111

    . - , , ; - ; - , , , -.

    - , - , . ( , 1)

    ( ) .., , . , , , . , - . , , .. .. , , -, .

    -, .

    - . , .. - 240 .. 30 , 1 25-30 .

    : -, , , , , , , ( ), , , -- , , , , , , , , .

  • 112

    , ( , .17/2011:152) -, 60 : 30 10% .. - .

    , .. , , , , , - , , -, , , , , , -, , , - ( .)

    ( - , - , ), e .

    1. (, , )

    .

    -

    39 27 12 4

    -1 51 31 15 5

    - 39 24 11 4

    - -, , .. 60:30:10 - .

    -, , , - . , -, .

    , - , .. ,

    1 - , http://www.pfsko.ukim.edu. mk/userfiles//, 11. 11. 2013.

  • 113

    , , , , , , . . - : , , , -, , .

    2: : ( ) 1, 2 , , - , ,

    , , .

    ,

    1

    4

    ,

    3+2

    , ,

    , , ,

    , .

    ,

    ( )

    - , ,

  • 114

    ,

    2

    4

    ,

    1+4

    ,

    :

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    1

    2

    ,

    2+0

    , ; ; ;

    ;

    ;

    , ,

    ,

  • 115

    , 1-4

    ,

    , ,

    -

    ,

    ,

    ,

    2

    4

    ,

    ,

    1+0+2

    .

    , , , )

    , ,

  • 116

    . , , - , -

    ; , , ,

    ,

    ,

    6

    ,

    2+2+1

    (), () ();

    , , , ,,;

    , , , ;

    ;

    - ;

    ;

    , ;

  • 117

    , , , ;

    ;

    , .

    , , , ;

    , ;

    , ; , ; , , ; , ;

    ; , , , , ; .

    ;

    ; , , ; ,

    ; , ; , ;. , ; , ; , , ;

    , ;

    , ;

    , 1 6

    ,

    2+2+1

    ;

    ;

    : , , , , ;

    ; ; ,

    ;

  • 118

    , , ;

    ;

    , ;

    ; ;

    ;

    ; (,

    ); ,

    ; ;

    ; ( );

    ; ;

    , .

    , 1 6

    ,

    2+2+1

    ;

    ;

    : , , , , ;

    ; ; ,

    ; , ,

    ;

    ;

    , ;

    ; ;

    ;

    ;

  • 119

    (, );

    , ;

    ;

    ; ( );

    ; ;

    , .

    ,

    2

    8

    ,

    2+2+1

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    , , ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    :

    - - ;

    - ; -

    ; - : -

    , , , , ; - ()

    ;

  • 120

    - , -., .

    .

    , , ?

    , -, , - , - /, , , - .

    , - , , , , , - , , , , , , 21 , - , , , , , , .

    1. , . (2010). - ,: , ( ).

    2. Buchberger, F., Campos, B.P., Kallos, D., Stephenson, J. (eds) (2001). Green Paper on Teacher education in Europe. Umea:University, 2000.

    3. Colin, J. M. (1992). Kurikulum, temeljni pojmovi, Zagreb: Educa. 4. , . (2000). -

    (, ), -: , , - .

    5. , 2008. 6. Vizek, V.V. (2005). Cjelozivotno obrazovanje ucitelja i nastavnika: viestruke

    perspektive, Zagreb: Institut za drustvena istrazivanja.

    7. Vizek, V.V. & all. (2009). Planiranje kurikuluma usmjerenoga na kompetenci-je u obrazovanju uitelja i nastavnika, Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet Sveuilista u Zagrebu, Uiteljski fakultet u Zagrebu.

  • 121

    8. Vukovi, V. (2000). Determinante obrayovnih postignua studenata ucitelj-skih fakulteta, Jagodina: Uciteljski fakultet.

    9. Zgaga, P., Persak, M. Repac, I. (2003). Teachers Education and the Bologna Process. A survey on trends in learning structures at institutions of Teachers

    education In Buchberger, F., Berghammer, S. (eds). Education Policy Analzies in a comparative Perspective II. Linz: Publication Series.

    10. (2008), , .

    Sneana Jovanova-Mitkovska, Ph.D.

    CURRICULUM, TEACHING CONTENTS, POSSIBLE CHANGES

    bstract: The different curricular concepts that apply when creating curricula

    at the Faculties that educate teachers, lead to different creation at the subject programs in the same, differences in the positioning of objectives, differences in content, differen-

    ces in outcomes, differences in the proposed literature Are different curricula, different content, different set of goals, and obstacle

    for mobility, transfer of students from the faculty to faculty, obstacle for recognition

    of specific subject? What are the obstacles in the way of creating a similar curriculum for this subject? The answer to these and other questions is subject of elaboration of

    this paper. It also presented the results of the comparative analysis of the respective

    programs of two subject programs: Methodology of teaching of nature and society;

    Research methods in education, of the Pedagogical faculties in Macedonia, Serbia, Croatia, , in view of the indicated parameters, and presents suggestions for possible

    changes to the same subject programs, similar content, updating them in line with modern trends in these areas.

    Keywords: teaching subject, course program, teachers competences.

  • 122

    . . ,

    .

    *

    , , .

    Carl Rogers

    : , , ( /) . , , - . , - .

    - , -. , , -. , .

    - , , , , . , - - , - . EU , .

    : , , -, , .

    , , - - , . ,

    * ,

    (179074), , - .

  • 123

    . - .

    . - - , , , . - . , -, - .

    - , . , . , . , , - () - . , (-), , , . - . - - , , .

    . , , - , , - , - . - , . (Buchberger et al, 2000) , - , . -

  • 124

    , . - , , , - . , - - .

    , , - , , , . ( ) ( ), . - . - ?

    , , - , ( ), - (), : , , ( ) (Buc-hberger et al., 2000).

    , :

    1. 2. - .

    , . , . - . , - () - . .

    . .

  • 125

    ( ). , - ( - 80-90 % , ). , . - , (Buchberger, et al., 2000). , - . , - . , , . - - - ().

    EU . , ( ) . - , - ( ) . - - , , , ().

    , - . , - , . . - : , - .

  • 126

    , - - .

    ?

    ( ) -

    , , - . . - .

    - - ( ). - , - . , () ( ., 2012). - , . , .

    , , , (, , , -) . Tuning : - , , (Gonzalez i Wagenaar, 2006). - - (, -, , , ) . , -, - - . , - .

    ( ) ( - - ) (- ).

  • 127

    , , :

    1) ; 2) -- -

    ; 3)

    (Spaji-Vrka, Kuko, Bai, 2001, 251). UNESCO-a (Pastuovi, 1997, 10)

    : ; ; ; .

    - (1989) , - , -- .

    - , - , :

    ) , , ,

    ) - , , ,

    ) , ,

    ) .

    (Klaassen, 1994) , : --; ; ; - (- (/) - - , - ).

    Teacher Training Agency (QTS Standards and ITT reqritinent) - : ) (. ); ) ( -, , -- ); ) (, - , , , -) (http://www.tta.gov.uk/training/qtsstandards/).

    (Improving education of teachers and trainers), , . - : 1) ; 2)

  • 128

    : - ; 3) ; 4) ; 5) - (www.europa.eu.int/ comm./education/policies/2010/doc/working-group-report.en.pdf).

    - (Lonari i Peji Papak, 2009) :

    .

    ;

    - (, ).

    .

    , , ,

    - . .

    . .

    ; ; ; , , -;

    , .

    , , - - 5 37 (Peklaj, 2008,171-188): ) ; ) ; ) ; ) - ; ) . , - , - - . - - , , .

    - (-) (Kyriacou, 1998, 24): - ; ; - ; ; .

    - 2009. . - ( )

  • 129

    . : ) , ; ) ; ) ; ) ) (www.zavod.edu.rs/docs/).

    , - . , , , .

    , -, , , . , - , : - -; : , ; , -, ; - ; .

    -, . - : 1. - , 2. -, 3. , 4. - , 5. .

    - - - . - - . , , : -- ( - ); ( ); ( - ).

  • 130

    - (Ze-ihner, 1993, : , 2010, 89): 1) ( ; 2) - ; 3) ( - ; 4) - ( - , ). () ( ).

    (Feiman Newser, : -, , 2003) : 1. ( ); 2. ( ); 3. ( ) 4. ( ). - .

    - (, 2010, 91-92) : ) ; ) ; ) - . : 1) ; 2) - , ; 3) - ; 4) ; 5) ; 6) ; 7) . : , . , - - , , - .

    , - , - - , . -- , - . , , - , -

  • 131

    , , - . , -- . - , - - , .

    , - . . - , - - . - . - , , --, -, - - - . , 1990. : - - (subject matter knowledge), - (pe-dagogical content knowledge) (curriculum knowledge), - (Shulman, : -, 2004, 41). - , , , . - - , - ?

    ( - ) - , , - , (, 2010, 554): 1) ( , -, - - ); 2) ( , 3) - (- ).

  • 132

    , - : - 10%, - - 30% - 60%. , . , . . -- . , - ( ECTS ), .

    - , - , , - - - .

    EU, USA, - , . , - . . -- , - , , - - (, 2007, 125).

    - , EU, . EU . OECD (The theacher today, 1990), - (Teacher quality, 1994), SIGMA - - (1995), , ,

  • 133

    . : - , , , , , - - , , ECTS-a, , .

    (Green paper on teacher education in Europe), , . , . - -, , - (Todorov, 2010, 5).

    EU, : ; ( , ,...); - ; ; . EU. - .

    . -, , , , . , , - (Vizak-Vidovi, 2005, 308).

    -- . - EU - - . , , , .

  • 134