16
I W 4 wuiuia $d~iiuni~au~uinndi~n~~uaazn~~uni~ai~i~~~azui ~~n~uiin~);3ldldmui=jn w w dszn.j~uii-r~a~iss<qaln~muiiu &&ni5?Cuni.rii8.riia"n9d5zaq6 L ~ ~ L ~ ~ U U L ~ U U R ~ J riqw d~ua~{u1iuu~msn'am~lGu3ni~s1niiuuidi~nG"11n~d~z~iiiu (uu. 1 ) ~~aziiuu~d iiuu~ uu.1 r rii~~u uazuu.2 niiqiiu 1u~~n~nfiuia~ia.1ua5d~u huaz 150 nu i3.l ~lauii~uiuu - k m a u 2547 warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 au.1 iirii~aiuaar d ww az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni~~lm~us1niiuuiluniw~au (9.00k1.13 azuuu) i ~ n i i n i u d~uu<nissini7uui uu.2 (7.87f 1.67 nruuu) arii.rBGuC16yn7qaBfi (p=o.001) dqii fi~nssuua~~iuuJmsui~ari~~muuinsgiuiiuui d{~ii~uirn~~~aiuisn~un~iun3a ~$7%e~n~mudiu L~M n15d~ia~d~1~~wnu~urn d flw d~fiu~naaiuaiuisnua~i~uui s~uc?uiiuuinizhu~u~d~aud~z~i~~d~6~uu3ni SjdW 4 eini~uui uu.1 ~~ia~i~lsnnu~uni~lGu3ni~aa~~nG"11n~lui1u~i m . 1 ~aiu q2~n~5u vii%~$ui%u3rnsinaiu~~w a~suinn~~ni~~~~uu~ni~~~n~iuui uu. 2

nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

I W 4 wuiuia $ d ~ i i u n i ~ a u ~ u i n n d i ~ n ~ ~ u a a z n ~ ~ u n i ~ a i ~ i ~ ~ ~ a z u i ~~n~ui in~ ) ;3 ld ldmui= jn w w

dszn. j~ui i - r~a~iss<qaln~mui iu &&ni5?Cuni.rii8.riia"n9d5zaq6 L ~ ~ L ~ ~ U U L ~ U U R ~ J

riqw d~ua~{u1iuu~msn'am~lGu3ni~s1niiuuidi~nG"11n~d~z~iiiu (uu. 1 ) ~ ~ a z i i u u ~ d

i i u u ~ uu.1 r r i i ~ ~ u uazuu.2 niiqiiu 1 u ~ ~ n ~ n f i u i a ~ i a . 1 u a 5 d ~ u h u a z 150 n u i3.l

~ l a u i i ~ u i u u - k m a u 2547 warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 au.1 i i r i i~a iuaar d w w

az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni~~lm~us1niiuuiluniw~au (9.00k1.13 azuuu) i ~ n i i n i u

d~uu<nissin i7uui uu.2 (7 .87f 1.67 nruuu) arii.rBGuC16yn7qaBfi (p=o.001) dqii

f i~nssuua~~iuuJmsui~ari~~muuinsgiui iuui d { ~ i i ~ u i r n ~ ~ ~ a i u i s n ~ u n ~ i u n 3 a ~$7%e~n~mudiu L ~ M n 1 5 d ~ i a ~ d ~ 1 ~ ~ w n u ~ u r n

d f l w d~f iu~naaiua iu isnua~i~uui s ~ u c ? u i i u u i n i z h u ~ u ~ d ~ a u d ~ z ~ i ~ ~ d ~ 6 ~ u u 3 n i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S j d W 4 e i n i ~ u u i uu.1 ~ ~ i a ~ i ~ l s n n u ~ u n i ~ l G u 3 n i ~ a a ~ ~ n G " 1 1 n ~ l u i 1 u ~ i m . 1 ~ a i u q 2 ~ n ~ 5 u

v i i % ~ $ u i % u 3 r n s i n a i u ~ ~ w a ~ s u i n n ~ ~ n i ~ ~ ~ ~ u u ~ n i ~ ~ ~ n ~ i u u i uu. 2

Page 2: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX

PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG STORE

AND TYPE 2 DRUG STORE

Rapeepun chalongsukl Panjapd ~ao~oonpa! Kamonrat ~ i m ~ i n ~ c h a r o e n ~

Ora wat ~eeraka w! Supasinee ~ r i t i ~ p a ~ a waraku! Saratwadee ~h~angtahamninime~

Abstract

There are many authorized persons who can dispense medicines in drug store such as

pharmacist, nurse, and drug store owner who was certified by Food and Drug Administration. \

It is not easy for consumer to notify the difference of there practice. The purpose of this

study was to compare client satisfaction with pharmacy service between type 1 drug store (in

which only pharmacist is a authorized persons for dispensing medicines in) and type 2 drug

store. Questionnaire was developed from the Thai community pharmacy's standard practice

of the Pharmacy Council. Each 1 5 0 clients of type 1 drug store and type 2 drug store in

Muang Nakhon Pathom were asked to evaluate their satisfaction toward the pharmacy service

during June to August, 2004. The result was that pharmacy service satisfaction score level

of clients' type 1 drug store were average 9.00 k 1.1 3 which was higher than score level of

clients' type 2 drug store(7.87 + 1.67). The average different score of two groups was

statistically significant (p=0.001). There are some activities of the Thai community

pharmacy's standard practice which clients did not easy notify or were not served, for \

example: referring to physician in severe case. So most of clients did not received these

services from the drug stores. In conclusion clients were satisfied with pharmacists' pharmacy

services more than another one's services.

Key words: drug store, pharmacist, pharmacy service

2 '~e~artment of Community Pharmacy, Department of Chemistry Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy,

Silpakorn University, 3~aculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Tel: 034-255800, Fax: 034-255801

Original Article

Page 3: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

nd~aIliln~ninuss~iuu3ni5 (service) ynqiu Wanaiui-rw ~ ~ ~ " I I O Q ~ ? $ P J ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ d u

Page 4: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

36 Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

~mus?u$u l*jlwniin Rating scales13 1 0

ms%~s7~6'aya v 4 9 4

~ b ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l % l r n o l L % ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 7 l6Lbfi F i l b ~ ~ f l Y ~ I L U ~ ~ J L U U ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I U (SD.) I U ~ B U

Cn.~giu a l ~ d l ~ u m s i ~ n . i i - M ' I L ~ f i x2 test Lbaz t test buniXuTdsansuh6-a2d SPSS for

windows version 11

Original Article

Page 5: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

~nwnunr,-v?alllrre~n~~&afi7~ ~da~d'fuu~f luui inwm::$aldu0~n~u~aai i~duiYuu3ni~ua~~ini iuui uu.1 ua::

i i u u i uu.2 ~ ~ i i ~ d ~ n ? i u ~ ~ ~ h 9 n " ~ ~ 0 d ~ ~ 9 ~ 7 ~ (p.0.74, 95%CI =-2.50 Z.1 3.53) sri'u

nisdnwi (p= 0.19) ai%w (p=0.33) ~ i u l 6 ' ( ~ = 0 . 4 9 , 95%CI =-4880.95 10140.14)

u a : : ~ m o d s : : a ~ ~ ~ a ~ n i s ~ i ~ u ~ i n ~ i u u i ~ u a " u d ~ ~ ~ a ~ a (p=0.80) lnudaulnnj~u6'uu'snis

;~ in%uui& 2 i i a i $ u h s 20-39 B msdnwiszGu%uudnwi ai3wYuh.r siu'l,n'utJluria9

5,000 $9 lo,ooo uin ~ ~ a z i i i m ~ d s z a ~ ~ ~ a ~ i d a u i ~ i n i i u u i (mn.rd 1) d $ n w m z $ a ~ d u a ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ i ~ ~ ~ u i ~ u u ~ n i s u a ~ ~ i n ~ i u i 8u. l uaz%uui uu.2 nwuii

4 4 d ~ n ~ i u ~ ~ m n d i ~ n " u a i i ~ i i ~ u d i ~ ~ ~ i ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ : : i ' u 0.05 l&afi L ~ F I (p=o.ooi) nisdsznnu

aiBw (p=0.33) nai~dua~ni~ l$u3msi iuui~a~el%uia~ 3 ilaudciiuui (p=o.o4) Uaz

naiudau~ni~uildu~nis~ini~uui au.1 n3a uu. 2 ~ t k d ( ~ = o . o o ~ ) (minsd 1)

{IUU~ au.1 <IUUI 91u.2 sau ~flwaz$ald91 a9

41uau 41uau 6196196 niswmaauaiXi n$uGa"aaiu {auaz {mag

(nu) (nu) (nu)

e i q (3) = < I 9 19 15.2 2 4 16.8 4 3

20-39 7 1 56.8 102 56.0 173 p = 0.74**

40-59 30 24 12 23.8 4 2 95%CI = -2.50-3.53

>= 60 5 4 5 3.5 10

52 al 125 100 143 100 268

*nl?~?Lm57zn~6lu x2 * *~ I=~?L~TIZ~~FIU t test

Page 6: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

38 Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

' l ~ i 7 ~ 3 L ~ U ~ ~ ~ I U U I * ~ I ~ ? L R s I z M C L " E ~ x2 **"I~?LFI~IUM.~GIU t test

Origind Article

Page 7: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

nisbd' .uub~uus-~iunaiui9w019u09~~er~~9du1~uu~ni~9ini iuui~9 2 w u i i

n+Sm.m uu.1 Briita&~viifYu 8.95_+1.19 uaznijuiiuui 38.2 Briibadudiriu 7.96k

1.53 isrii~a~uaa.mi% 2 niju ~ n a i u a m n ~ i ~ i i u e p i i ~ ~ ~ u ~ i ~ y n i ~ ~ ~ ~ (p = 0.001, gss6~1

Page 8: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

40 Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

n i n ~ d 2 m~~d?~uduurruiun~iu~~wali)~a;1$~~1l.a'u3n1~41~~~nm1~a1~w

$lY7M"117 7lU.1 ~lY7ME17 7lE1.2 ai3w niswnaaua5G

dlb~&.I SD. dlbiJ&J SD.

*n15%n~i"~T(ilu t test

- - - -

naiu~nisl3u?niaiiuui~a1d $1~~11 '11~1.1 $1~7~~1 au.2 niswmaaua%i

lodiaa 3 ~ 4 a ~ d e i i ~ u i Fiit.adu SD. FiW&k.l SD.

*~IT~?L~TI=MT~u t test

Original Article

Page 9: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

~ ~ - -

~aiuin1su7%5~l?ni==i %MUI Y U . ~ <iuai w . 2 ,I n7sw~aouaGG

Y O ~ < I U U ~ L L ~ J G d ~ m d ~ SD. d~mdu SD.

*~IGLF~~I::MTwI t test

m*tGuurGuun'~n**~~dtruutdi7~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ i u u i m ~ l & ~ u ~ ~ n 4 7 ~ u 7

~ u i Y u u i m s ~ i u u i uu.1 uinniiiaua:: 78 s::UiiI~~uu~nisds~tu~a~i~unnis

~$u~nlsmuuins~iui iuui~a~anibn~"~~ns~u un~iurnsi i~is$auIdi~ls~wuiui~luns4 w e

diiainisTuus.r i i ~ i u q i a s a r 45.0 dsruii265'u vSuasaa:: 38.2 szyii%uiimsuunnds::a"G

rnsl$uiuaq$d;u (d~::uiiniuluiiuiiu3ni~n~a~a"nnaiuGu~a9n iiu5msnsasins::Eiu

i i n i a l u b ~ a n ua::iiuiiuirnsnsas~duu~daud~iu~nb~uiauat 21.4, 19.9 aa:: 14.5

niuGi6'u (nisiqd 5)

B ~ ~ i u ( ~ i Y u u i n i s h u u i uu.2 uinniiiaua:: 80 s:u i i165'uu5ma~inhukd rns

~ n ' ~ u u i d i i ~ n w m : : a u ~ s d (%war 96.6) ~ ~ f . 9 " u ~ m s ~ u y w u $ u w " u ~ ~ (iaaa:: 93.8) n ~ s n a u

C i i o 1 u l 6 a i i q 6 ~ ~ u (5aua:: 89.8) ms~~nlarnalf;r"(dau~nf;liudaa~$uii~ 7 (iaua: 88.4)

msri;r~a5ums~$uiaii~~~ui::au (iaua: 84.9) mso iu8qUnnal$u id~~~s5q (ia~a:: 83.6)

msl$dia5uiu tdaan"u%nis~dui bba::~ana~5::a"~1unis1$ui (iaua:: 83.6) nis%nf;liua7nis

ua::ds::~msYnwidiiuui (iaua:: 80.1) riauu~msd(uiYuu~n1s~::~i116~u~su 16~Vlm' mduiiuiiu3rns~lsa~a"nnaiuGu~aGn (4ua:: 1.4) niu1uiiuiiu3rns~lsa~a"n~::6'udinia1~

~ l a n (isua:: 0.7) ua-u'inisdI'lli265'u~inni~iiubau i is u5msnn i l~duu~daudp~" iu (mnq

fi 5)

m~bd'i~ub~uums~f.9"u~ni~ua~~iuui us.1 LLR:: uu. 2 ~ ~ d a z ~ d u u u ~ s q f i s m d

wuiincjuvSuiuui uu.1 ii4iuauiaua::1a~(~uu~msn~::yiihu~njjmsl~u~ms~~da:: d c r w

~ s n s - i u ~ % ~ a~ulnniincju5iuui uu.2 un~iumsl6Tuuinuanwmz~u;sd Tf.s{iniuu5ms d

i i u u i 1u.2 ~s::yii16~uu5nis6ii4iuauuinniiii~dui 1u.1 (;dm 1)

Page 10: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

42 Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

misi~nd 5 id?u~~~u~~~m~~~6az~d~~~~dn~un'?aEii.rl6?ueinsiuui~uil~u3nis

Original Article

Page 11: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

~~auanriaasiua::tdunua~ii;3nssudhuuil$u~ni~n"u[uiiuu~msaan~ilu 1 9

$uuu wuiin~uniar i i~dl6Yuu~ni~~~ni iuui uu. 1 ni7iaua:: 80 i i n a i u w a l q l u i i i a u

~n=jdii~uuw"iinis un~~uni-ioiuii~ds::a"$ni~lduin$~n'auiiaua:: 76.2 C/WJI ;~~"U~~UUU u3msd m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u : : r i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m u ~ u n i ~ ~ a ~ i i u a a : : i n a i ~ . i n (iaua:: 79.5) n i s l g

d i a ' a u i u i d u 3 i i u n i s ~ ~ u Y n ~ ~ u i (iaaa:: 63.1) m u l u i i u ~ m ~ ~ ~ u 3 n i 5 u " a ~ a 6 i d ~ n a i ddcr

~ ' ; s q u 3 u i ~ u a u (iaua:: 78.0) m 5 i i ~ ~ a ~ a u I ~ ~ ~ I 5 ~ w u i u i a I u n ~ m ' ~ 1 u a i n 1 5 ~ u ~ b ~ ~

(iaua: 54.2) m~flu~nd~.T$m5lduiua~~dau (iaua:: 54) m ~ l u i i u i u ~ n i 5 m 5 a ~ T m

n3iuihIiulaiin (iaua: 46.4) mu~uhu~u~m5m5a9a"m~: :~~d imia~ub~am (iaua:: 46.2)

rnsu3msnsa~i~uu[daudpJ"iu (iaua:: 31.6) (mi5iqd 6)

h a ~ u n ~ u h a r i ~ r d a i i u u 3 n i ~ ~ i n i i u u i ua.2 4iuauuinni i<aua:: 8 0 in-nu d c r w

Gqwa1;3lu~dbiuuaaqfi~n~5u~~da1d$ rn5~6~uuinuan~ol::au~56Mdbba::~~~u~ni5i

u~aubGu6Z ua::~ii~mann.maiuG~wa10~u~d~~uufi;3n~~uu3ni~m~a~~duu[dau~pJ"iu

u a q i i u u i uu.2 baa i w n d i ~ @ i n u ~ ~ ~ u i u f l ~ n ~ ~ u $ ~ u i i u u i uu.2 ( m n q d 5)

Page 12: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

;7um nu. 2

san 'un~~~wa1;3~au5n~d1~iu

Original Article

Page 13: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

6 ~ ~ 7 UU. 1

i i ; ~ n s s u i i u u i s ~ ~ u ' u ~ ~ i u w a ~ ~ o i a u ~ n i s d l m ' 5 ' ~

aiin'ugsrliuu~nls rial9

t a u 1 w a h n u w a h uin

9 50 71 130 fl1ULIIUl:BU rdu aau o

(6.9) (38.5) (54.6) (100.0) tm<a~ituulni? i 0 i u d a

$IUUI UU. 2

a'uw"us'2 t d u a n i w 1 2 33 94 130 3 20 52 62 137

1 9 . ~ 5 ~ 1 5 ~ 5 ? Q i d f J ~ { f i 7 ~ 6 7 4 2 19 J " 0 0 0 0 0 nuw (31.6) (36.8) (21.1) (10.5) (100.0)

a=plt~az3insdw a

~:~unaiu~~wa1~aa~n~uGaa4i~dau~ni~1uniw~aud16~u~iniiuuin"~ 2 uuu .ii naiuumnn'iqhari iq~m~w h u n ~ ~ n i a $ i . r a a q i i u u i au.1 ii5:n'um3u~qwuludau5ni5~

v ' v 4

~n ' iuu inn i in~uaaq i iuu i au.2 u ~ i r i n w t u : ~ a ~ d a ~ ~ ~ f l " ~ ~ u ~ n i ~ a ~ ~ i i u u i uu. 1 aat. au.

2 lajn$iun~q;u$qnum lmu~nwtu:da~mndi~i?i'u {a ~wer naiudaaqni~l$u5ni5iiuui$aId d

l u 3 LWEIU~~~-IU.NI ua-naiunaa.mi;ldu~ni~iiu~i~a~~~u~b~a:fiu~u ?h( 'ui lh$ni~hu

w au.1 h u l n o j ~ i l u ~ w n n @ q aiBw?u<i~ 1uiail.l 3 ~ ~ a u f i ~ i i u u i ~ m ~ l $ u 3 n i ~ ~ i n ~ i u u i

$--JIJ~~:UIN 1- 2 n&da~Wau ~ ~ a : ~ i l u ~ n k d ~ : i i a a ~ i i u u i au.1 ~LBUG-JLLWUIU

ms8nwin&i l~uunr: i /{ui iuu3m~~in?iu~~ au.2 tbu{dIu'~nuldl~u3ni~iiuui$aId

Page 14: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

46 Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

v Y

w:a%uui au.2 dr6u~abbnun7s8nwin?~~udaq 3 ~ i~audt j iuu i bbi~danmaausz~unm W Y

i ~ w a ~ s b b u n r i a u m u ~ n w ~ ~ d d i ~ n " u " 1 1 a ~ n ~ u ~ a a d i 9 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ a b w i a u b ~ u *~l i j ins~Caqsin~u v v 9 m a z d s ~ ~ n d a u . n u ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ n " % w ~ u s ~ n n m s ~ ~ w " n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u n i s ~ u ~ ~ a y a ~ ~ u a n " u n i s ~ $

2' tnc i iumdadi~ luinuu ds-naun"uamm~%nssu~n'iinis~odifisnssu~i~?%i!wai~~du

msh~dii~bn&nssu~n~w"u$qb~d w.n.2543" ~ ~ a d s r a ~ ~ u h ~ l ~ d ~ z ~ ~ " ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ d i ~ s d a

unuinua~?m!wm~"11ns4u di l~{u3~n~inaiunio~a"~dau3niss7ni iuui ka l l d ~ ~ u

s i n ~ ~ u d i ~ u u i ~ B u ~ ~ i u ~ a o i u d - j i ~ ~ ~ u u i ~ i i t u kZu{uu'shnsqlliaiuisnuonZqnaiu

umndi~sz~ii~nisibn~"11ns~8u{dfisJ"G~w'7dmiung~u7u1uiiuui uu.1 ihrnsiynains d au 7~il~~dfisJ"G~w'idmiungwuiu~ui~uu7 1u.2 11s-naunYUinuinisd7q ~iiYm57uaqnis

~ d ~ u u t ~ r l a ~ a r i ~ ~ s a m ~ 4 a ~ ~ a ~ d 3 u u ~ ~ u u n " u a ~ m d e j i u u ua-{u?lnninu7sn~hkun$qLya vv.4 Y 4 d d 2

n n u ~ 6 i u n i d $ u i ~ ' a d i ~ n a " i ~ u a i ~ d11~~n~wusnis6iuuinuwu~iunaiu~6iuduin'au

aiuisniinwiw~naiu$~u~GulhanPsa ~~d~lGaiuisolGuiusnia~iuuiw~amau~aa~iiU

1nduan"ernis1$u716ad~~~dsz~~~sliw~ v v

Y d l w vd Y e ~iu?~unkijwuuenu~a~~nmii~nl~usn7siiuuikaldeiau 1 s~i~zEiunmui-rwals d Y Y

dau5n~sd1~Yu~iniiuuiuinnii{d~uiu 7nf~i~szdl$u3msiiuu7 (msiqn 3) vi.lijsis c: e

~8uldl6i7msl$u'sn7seiau 7hulba~~wuo~nnunnndi~9inu3n7sd16?u~~daznf~diunii

~~dninb8un7sl$u5nisdi iu~5u n~uwuiis:Guna7uiqwalsaoa~ ~inin7sl$u3nis

~8udszi i (ons-~.~d 4) dsingn~soid~snn~~~n"u~d~~uuua~da~i ibs; r 5 (GAP 5) uaq

Parasumman uaznmz ("GAPS" MODEL OF SERVICE QUALITY) d~aua i i i a ~ i i q d r i i ~ ~

pn61~riwa~sn'uqiuuims ~~nnnna~uumnh~sznii~naiun~mwa"~ (expected s e ~ i c e s ) n"u d vw

qormwuatnunhsuu?n7s (Percieved sewices)l6 ~wsirn7sC/ $ujn?uu3n7sidszaunisdsin

nisu3msnf~riaudaudilGinaiun~mwa"~lunis?uu3nisn~~da lu~siniiuuiuin& &$IJ

w1nu3n i sd l 6?un~~~mu i~~ i i ~~u~ r i aud i~~~~1a iu i~wa~sama~~6

2 d ~ ~ u u ~ a ~ i i ~ n s s u u 5 n ~ ~ d i ~ u i i u u i wui~5duuuflsnssuna7uadi~diiuu7 au.1

aisszimsln'u3nisua~iisnssuw"u 1 idu rn3rju;nd.j-iGmsl$u7 rnskda{dau nd{ui

? u u ~ m s k ~ 1 d a ~ s s - ~ a 1 ~ 7 s o ~ ~ b n m ~ f t u l m ~ m u d i u ~ n ~ ~ u ~ u i ? u u ~ n ~ 5 ~ 6 i d ~ u ~ ~ u ~ u

8snssuifu~munsq drmjq~8ununsan$ayads::iG~aq gndqddd$quwnu"i:mums~ %~dil$( E:d v

uiiuu3msiiuaulu'u~nd~~yi~iiuu~~fi~nssu~~~~~ udau'1dsnn~ui?uu?nis~iniiuu7 d W d W

uu.1 dl6?uu~nislufisnssu~~~~PdYu~uamdauduinniiiiuu uu.2 uans~ndniuGaadi.rCi

l $ u ~ n ~ s i i u u ~ "11u.2 iauaz 68.5 i ~ i n a ~ u ~ ~ i l s i m i i m u ~ a ~ l X ? u u ~ n i s s ~ n ~ n ~ ' t l n s (mis i~

d 5) & ~ ~ a ~ q l i ' ~ ~ u i i $ u ? l n n ~ nsiu~~na7u~~mnd7q1a~i7uu7~;1 2 LLUU 49d7Ii'~?!aiii

m r i a n s d f i s J " ~ ~ ~ u d s z ~ i d i i u u 7 ~ n i 7 ~ ~ udnijui7usi uu.idina~uiqwds~ufisnssu$ i

Original Article

Page 15: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

rana1GhG9 d d d

1. ws~ in f lnJ t fGu i W.W. 2510 s i a ~ s s i y ~unw i a f l u f i ~ ~ v L ~ U M 84 naun 101 Tun

20 !a im 2510. d

2. wszsiaGqgGsi (irrjud 3) W.W. 2522. s i a i i s s ~ y ~ u n w i ~GUGLWM ~ i u n 96 nau

d 79 T U ~ 13 W[l\mlRN 2522. d

3. w s r n a ~ ~ n ~ ~ i i u i (PGIJ~ 4) W.H. 2527.51af is iny~unvi ~Liiun 101 mud 85 iud

3 fl4n47nU 2527.

4. Q jnJ l 6 1 ~ 3 , 5 ~ 4 ~ 3 1 ~ irEIOIq"II, L ~ 1 3 h l d ;7$11~, ?B%U7 fl3?6!$ LLaz R < ~ I

mqeia . 2544. nmumshsl~uiaa~d4za7'11u: d a u a L i f a i l s n i r l u ~ a n n ~ m

n z h n n . a7sa isu~ i4nu iZuaad ins 21 (GLwM): 74-93.

5. ani~nZanssu Lbaz d ~ ~ n ~ i u ~ o r z n s s u n i s u i ~ i s ~ ~ a z ~ ~ ~ 2546. winfi iZqGwu-~<-~u

u i ~ i i ' i ~ u i n s ~ i u . s m ~ u i u i i a a n i ~ n i a n 4 s u 9 (I): 1-2.

6. Wirat Tongrod. 200 2. Development and validation of the Thai community pharmacy's

standard practice guidelines. Ph.D. thesis (Pharmacy Administration), Mahldol University.

7. am~nianssu. 2546. <iuuifif;~mw. sm~uiui~aani~ni"tlnssu 9 (3): I.

Page 16: nu warnfr~uwujin~udiuu3n7ssiniiuu7 az~~uua~iu4~walsiau?ni ... · Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLIENT SATISFACTION WllX PHARMACY SERVICE BETWEEN TYPE 1 DRUG

Thai J Health Research 19(1), 2005

8. 3-hv33fl ilaB4qa, k%@@i &iwa, ~ u 1 3 & w d $IZIIW, qaaui 1336% LL~:: b 5 a 5

$fl'ul39u'flI@9~1. 2545. ~ T U ? ~ ~ L ~ & ~ T ~ U ~ ~ " I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I B W ~ ~ " ~ W ~ , 313Ell3%FJ

4anuini~m~ni=iu.wn 16 (I): 9-24.

9. Kotler P. 1991. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and

Control. 7th ed. Prentice-Hall Internationa1,Inc. London. p 3.

10. d i ~ n 4 i u a ~ 6 u ~ s d i u . 2544. ~ i u ~ i u a 5 6 ~ ~ v a " m d ~ - 4 1 ~ 2544. ~w%x.fntuni56uWd

n2;rnwuMiuos. 1,415 4-6.

1 I. anitnZ"~~n=riu. 2547. u i~~q iu f i uu i . 81od"nn9iu~am"5ni~wni ~ni%n33u n~::nm4

aisismqa n=y~nwuviun' . 12. am L n i h 5 3 u . 2547. hs4ms~~uiua-iu30~~mniwiiuui. l u Pharmacy

Accreditation. d i U Y n c n u ~ a a i " 5 m ~ a n i ~ n F i a n s ~ u nst.n=i3.raisismqu

ny.nwuviuns MGI 9- 17.

13. aumu qu85~R5qa. 2538. n i ~ d ~ ~ i i u n i ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u ~ u ~ u - a ~ 5 0 d ~ : : T u a u ' (cost-

Utility Analysis) ~ ~ 4 ~ B 3 ~ 1 5 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ d 5 ~ b ~ f l ~ ~ . 3 1 3 ~ n ~ L f l 3 ~ ~ f l l l ~ l l < 13

(1): 5-60.

14. r n i~ngan53u . 2 5 4 3 . 8 d m i ~ ~ n ~ a 2 2543 L ~ B I J W ~ ~ M . ~ m v u i u ? j i ~ ~ n i ~ n ~ i " 1 1 n ~ 5 u

6 (2): 1-2.

15. d u u h u i . 2547. h u u i a a q ~ n % n ~ . . . ~ B ~ ~ B J ~ U ~ I P ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I W . di~uiI116 2 (21):

18-20.

16. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml VA. and Berry LL. 1985. A conceptual Model of service

quality and its Implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 46 (6): 41-

50.

Original Article