27
LAPORAN PENELITIAN PENGUATAN MUTU PROGRAM STUDI (PPMPS) PERSPEKTIF MAHASISWA PASCASARJANA TERHADAP DUKUNGAN LEARN FROM HOME DALAM MENGATASI PANDEMIK COVID 19 Tim Pengusul Dr. Hj. Ihsana El Khuluqo, M.Pd (NIDN. 0309015703) Prof. Dr. Abdul Rahman A. Ghani, M.Pd (NIDN. 0310036104) Nomor Surat Kontrak Penelitian : 335/F.03.07/2020 Nilai Kontrak : Rp. 12.000.000 ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PROF. DR. HAMKA 2020

PERSPEKTIF MAHASISWA PASCASARJANA TERHADAP …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

LAPORAN

PENELITIAN PENGUATAN MUTU PROGRAM STUDI (PPMPS)

PERSPEKTIF MAHASISWA PASCASARJANA

TERHADAP DUKUNGAN LEARN FROM HOME

DALAM MENGATASI PANDEMIK COVID 19

Tim Pengusul

Dr. Hj. Ihsana El Khuluqo, M.Pd (NIDN. 0309015703)

Prof. Dr. Abdul Rahman A. Ghani, M.Pd (NIDN. 0310036104)

Nomor Surat Kontrak Penelitian : 335/F.03.07/2020

Nilai Kontrak : Rp. 12.000.000

ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN

SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PROF. DR. HAMKA

2020

2

3

SURAT KONTRAK PENELITIAN

4

5

ABSTRAK

Covid-19 atau yang lebih dikenal dengan nama corona virus merupakan virus yang menyerang

pernapasan jenis terbaru dengan penularan yang sangat cepat. Virus ini dapat menyebabkan

gangguan pernafasan, pneumonia hingga kematian. Dampak dari adanya virus ini mengenai

seluruh aspek kehidupan salah satunya sektor pendidikan, sehingga proses kegiatan belajar dan

mengajar terganggu. Penelitian Prespektif Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Terhadap Dukungan Learn

From Home dalam Mengatasi Pandemik COVID-19 dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana

pandangan mahasiswa pascasarjana pada pembelajaran berbasis online pada masa darurat

pandemik COVID-19. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode penelitian

mixed metodh atau metode kombinasi antara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Responden yang

ditetapkan untuk penelitian ini yaitu mahasiswa Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas

Muhammadiyah Prof DR HAMKA yang masih aktif melaksanakan perkuliahan serta

mengikuti perkuliahan online dari rumah. Penarikan suara responden dilaksanakan

menggunakan google form sehingga data yang terkumpul dapat diolah secara cepat dan akurat.

Luaran yang ditargetkan untuk penelitian ini yaitu artikel jurnal.

Kata kunci: Covid-19, Learn From Home, E-Learning

6

DAFTAR ISI

HALAMAN SAMPUL ........................................................................................................ 1

HALAMAN PENGESAHAN .............................................................................................. 2

SURAT KONTRAK PENELITIAN ..................................................................................... 3

ABSTRAK............................................................................................................................ 5

DAFTAR ISI ....................................................................................................................... 6

BAB 1. PENDAHULUAN ................................................................................................... 7

BAB 2. TINJAUAN PUSTAKA .......................................................................................... 8

BAB 3. METODE PENELITIAN ..................................................................................... 10

BAB 4. HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN .............................................................................. 11

BAB 5. KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN .............................................................................. 15

BAB 6 LUARAN YANG DICAPAI ................................................................................. 16

BAB 7 RENCANA TINDAK LANJUT DAN PROYEKSI HILIRISASI ........................... 17

DAFTAR PUSTAKA ........................................................................................................ 18

LAMPIRAN ...................................................................................................................... 19

- Artikel ilmiah (draft, status submission atau reprint) ....................................................... 19

7

BAB 1. PENDAHULUAN

Latar Belakang

Virus Corona COVID 19 berdampak besar bagi seluruh lini kehidupan masyarakat tak

terkecuali sektor pendidikan. Proses kegiatan belajar dan mengajar peserta didik di seluruh

penjuru nusantara terganggu sejak Presiden Joko Widodo mengumumunkan kasus pertama

pasien positif virus corona COVID-19 pada 2 Maret 2020. Pemerintah menghimbau agar

pelaksanaan pendidikan dilaksanakan dari rumah menggunakan jaringan internet sehingga

proses pendidikan dapat terus berjalan dan peserta didik mendapat hak nya dalam memperoleh

pendidikan.

Sesuai dengan himbauan pemerintah untuk kerja dari rumah, berlajar di rumah dan ibadah di

rumah, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA turut

melaksanaan himbauan tersebut dengan mengganti sistem kegiatan belajar mengajar tatap

muka menjadi pembelajaran berbasis internet di rumah. Setiap pertemuan perkuliahan akan

dicatat secara rinci mengenai materi perkuliahan serta jumlah peserta didik yang mengikuti

kelas online. Setiap dosen wajib melaporkan proses perkuliahan online perharinya.

Seiring dengan perkembangan teknologi, banyak platform yang menyediakan jasa untuk

melaksanakan perkuliahan online sehingga pembelajaran tetap berlangsung. Namun hal ini

bukan berati tidak ada kendala yang muncul. Beberapa faktor penghambat dalam mengikuti

kegiatan learn from home diantaranya 1) keterbatasan jaringan yang diakibatkan oleh letak

geografis sehingga sulit untuk mengakses platform perkuliahan online. 2) keterbatasan biaya,

hal ini diakibatkan dalam mengakses platform perkuliahan online diperlukan data yang cukup

besar sehingga menambah beban untuk sebagian peserta didik..

Urgensi Penelitian

Penelitian ini berfokus pada pendapat mahasiswa pascasarjana terkait pembelajaran berbasis

internet yang dilaksanakan selama masa darurat COVID-19. Pembelajaran berbasis internet

atau learn from home memiliki keunggulan sekaligus kelemahan yang dapat dirasakan

langsung oleh seluruh mahasiswa sehingga mahasiswa dapat memberikan prespektif secara

real berdasarkan pengalaman mereka dalam melaksanakan kegiatan perkuliahan dari rumah

8

BAB 2. TINJAUAN PUSTAKA

A. State of the Art

(Sun & Chen, 2016) “distance education is teaching and planned learning in which

teaching normally occurs in a different place from learning, requiring communication

through technologies as well as special institutional organization”

(Crawford-Ferre, Heather GlynnWiest, Lynda R., 2012) Online learning can be

implemented effectively when supported by the quality of the faculty. Online learning

should have training related to online design and instruction. The training that must be held

is adequate in the technology that applies to online teaching: How to use the online system

and of course Soft- Ware, knowing what to do and who to contact when certain

technological problems occur.

(Iqbal & Ahmad, 2010) For many developing countries, e-Learning is regarded as a

solution to meet the growing demand for higher education. In Pakistan, online education

is promoted as "Education for all" because it aims to reach students who live too far away

from the city where higher education is implemented and can not afford to pay

conventional higher education costs.(Ngampornchai & Adams, 2016) e-learning solves the

problems of large classrooms, increasing enrollment, and limited staff.

B. Pembelajaran Jarak jauh

(Darmayanti, Setiani, & Oetojo, 2007) Konsep pembelajaran perguruan tinggi selalu

digambarkan pada pertemuan tatap muka antara pendidik dengan peserta didik yang

berada pada ruang yang sama dalam pandangan tradisional. Paradigma baru muncul terkait

proses kegiatan belajar mengajar berlangsung tidak lagi diharuskan untuk tatap muka

dalam ruangan yang sama. Kehadiran teknologi internet memecahkan paradigma lama

dimana proses kegiatan belajar mengajar harus berada dalam satu ruangan yang sama dan

melalui tatap muka. Kini kegiatan proses pembelajaran dapat dilakukan dimana saja tampa

terhalang ruang dan waktu.

Pembelajaran dapat dilakukan dimana saja dan kapan saja berkat adanya kemajuan

teknologi informasi berupa internet. Berbagai media pembelajaran online tersedia untuk

mendukung proses pembelajaran tampa harus tatap muka di lingkungan yang sama

merupakan bagian positif dari dampak kemajuan teknologi internet ini. Namun

pembelajaran melalui internet ini membutuhkan pengelolaan para pendidik agar ilmu yang

disampaikan tepat sasaran dan menyeluruh pada peserta didik.

Pembelajaran jarak jauh atau lebih dikenal dengan sebutan online learning / e-

learning sudah ada dan diterapkan sejak tahun 1980. (Harasim, 2000)The first online

course was conducted in 1981, and the first online program was established by the Western

behavior Sciences Institute in the year 1982. Pembelajaran jarak jauh ini dilaksanakan

karena adanya suatu kondisi perbedaan geofrafis antara pengajar dengan peserta didik.

(Nugroho, 2012) Pembelajaran jarak jauh memerlukan media pembelajaran yang

interaktif untuk menartik perhatian peserta didik. Selanjutnya, pada pertengahan abad ke-

9

20 usaha pengembangan sarana atau media pembelajaran sudah semakin maju yaitu

ditandai dengan adanya pemanfaatan alat visual yang mulai dilengkapi dengan peralatan

audio, maka terciptalah peralatan audio-visual pembelajaran. Salah satu gambaran yang

paling banyak dijadikan acuan sebagai landasan teori penggunaan media dalam proses

belajar adalah Dale’s Cone of Experience (Kerucut pengalaman Dale)

(Palvia et al., 2018) Web-based learning or online education change the way we

perform teaching and learning. Changes in education models happen very quickly. All

institutions around the world adapt to this change, a highly dynamic educational landscape

has generated a great interest among researchers, educators, administrators, policymakers,

publishers, and businesses.

10

BAB 3. METODE PENELITIAN

Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis adalah lapangan (field research) peneliti

menggunakan jenis penelitian campuran/kombinasi (mixed methodology). Mixed method

menghasilkan fakta yang lebih komprehensif dalam meneliti masalah penelitian, karena

peneliti ini memiliki kebebasan untuk menggunakan semua alat pengumpul data sesuai dengan

jenis data yang dibutuhkan. Sedangkan kuantitatif atau kualitatif hanya terbatas pada jenis alat

pengumpul data tertentu saja.

Metode Penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode penelitian Mix Method. Penelitian Mix

Metodh dapat menggambarkan hasil penelitian dengan akurat mengacu pada data akurat yang

mengacu pada data yang diberikan mahasiswa terkait preskpektif mahasiswa terhadap

dukungan learn from home dalam mengatasi COVID-19.

11

BAB 4. HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN

Responden penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas

Muhammadiyah PROF. DR. HAMKA terdiri dari 9 (sembilan) program studi. Responden

dipilih dengan ketentuan bahwa siswa telah mengikuti pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis

online.

Jumlah peserta adalah 428 mahasiswa / responden yang terdiri dari 9 (sembilan)

program studi di Sekolah Pascasarjana PROF Universitas Muhammadiyah. DR. HAMKA

dengan rincian seperti pada tabel berikut.

Berdasarkan diagram di atas terlihat terdapat 316 responden yang menggunakan flat form

zoom sebagai aplikasi pendukung dalam proses pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis online.

Sedangkan responden lain lebih suka menggunakan google classroom, whatsapp dan aplikasi

020406080

100120140160180

Study Program

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

zoom

Google Classroom

Whatsapp

Schoology

Email

E-learning

Skype

12

lain dalam melakukan kegiatan pembelajaran melalui kesepakatan dan fitur yang disediakan di

setiap flat form.

Dari diagram tersebut diketahui terdapat 3012 responden yang menyatakan bahwa dosen

melaksanakan pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis online atau kuliah online tepat waktu sesuai

dengan jadwal.

Terlihat pula bahwa 398 responden menyatakan bahwa dosen terus menerus memberikan

tugas individu atau kelompok setiap kali melakukan kuliah online atau pembelajaran jarak jauh

berbasis online.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Strongly Agree Agree doubtful disagree

Teaching Schedule

Strongly Agree

Agree

Doubtful

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Task

13

Data tersebut juga mengungkapkan terdapat 408 responden yang menyatakan adanya

komunikasi dua arah antara dosen dan mahasiswa selama kuliah online atau kegiatan

pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis online.

Empat ratus dua belas (412) responden menyatakan bahwa selama perkuliahan online

atau pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis online terjadi beberapa kendala yang cukup signifikan

yang mengganggu proses pembelajaran.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Strongly Agree Agree Doubtful Disagree Strongly Disagree

2-way Communication

Strongly Agree

Agree

Doubtful

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0 50 100 150 200 250

Obstacle in Online Learning

Strongly Agree Agree Doubtful Disagree Strongly Disagree

14

Terdapat 304 responden yang mengungkapkan bahwa keterbatasan internet menjadi

penghambat dalam melakukan perkuliahan online. Tiga puluh satu (31) responden menyatakan

kendala teknologi menghambat perkuliahan online, dan 105 responden menyatakan

keterbatasan penggunaan aplikasi menghambat perkuliahan online.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Internet Network Limitations Technological Limitations Aplication MasteryLimitations

15

BAB 5. KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN

Dari hasil diagram pertama terlihat sebanyak 316 responden menggunakan flat form

zoom sebagai aplikasi pendukung proses pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis online. Sedangkan

responden lainnya memilih untuk menggunakan google classroom, whatsspp dan aplikasi

lainnya dalam melaksanakan kegiatan pembelajaran melalui kesepakatan dan fitur-fitur yang

disediakan oleh masing-masing flat form. Pada diagram berikutnya, terkait proses perkuliahan

online atau pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis online, terdapat 302 responden yang menyatakan

bahwa dosen melaksanakan tugasnya tepat waktu sesuai dengan jadwal. Tiga ratus sembilan

puluh delapan (398) responden menyatakan bahwa dosennya terus menerus memberikan tugas.

Terdapat 408 responden yang menyatakan bahwa terjalin komunikasi dua arah antara dosen

dan mahasiswa. Empat ratus dua belas (412) responden menyatakan beberapa kendala

signifikan mengganggu proses pembelajaran, dan 304 responden menyatakan keterbatasan

internet menghambat proses pembelajaran. Sedangkan 31 responden menyatakan keterbatasan

teknologi menjadi penghambat proses pembelajaran. Terdapat 105 responden yang

menyatakan bahwa keterbatasan penggunaan aplikasi menjadi kendala dalam pelaksanaan

proses pembelajaran.

16

BAB 6 LUARAN YANG DICAPAI

Luaran yang dicapai berisi Identitas luaran penelitian yang dicapai oleh peneliti sesuai

dengan skema penelitian yang dipilih.

Jurnal

IDENTITAS JURNAL

1 Nama Jurnal Research in Learning Technology

2 Website Jurnal https://journal.alt.ac.uk/

3 Status Makalah Submitted

4 Jenis Jurnal Jurnal International

4 Tanggal Submit 5 Agustus 2020

5 Bukti Screenshot submit

17

BAB VII RENCANA TINDAK LANJUT DAN PROYEKSI HILIRISASI

Minimal mencakup 2 hal ini.

Hasil Penelitian Penelitian yang peneliti lakukan termasuk

pengembangan keilmuan dengan melihat perspektif

mahasiswa dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran secara

online. Untuk riset selanjutnya akan di desain sebuat

platform khusus untuk mewadahi seluruh

pembelajaran online.

Rencana Tindak Lanjut Mendesain dan membuat platform yang dapat

menjadikan wadah pembelajaran online dengan

berbagai macam pilihan seperti tatap muka online

atau hanya diskusi saling berkirim tugas.

18

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Crawford-Ferre, Heather GlynnWiest, Lynda R. (2012). Effective Online Instruction in

Higher Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11–14.

Harasim, L. (2000). Harasim2000. 3, 41–61.

Iqbal, M. J., & Ahmad, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of education through e-learning: The

case study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance

Education, 11(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.23439

Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in

Northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher

Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0034-x

Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018).

Online Education: Worldwide Status, Challenges, Trends, and Implications. Journal of

Global Information Technology Management, 21(4), 233–241.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262

Samir Abou El-Seoud, M., Taj-Eddin, I. A. T. F., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M. M., & Nosseir,

A. (2014). E-learning and students’ motivation: A research study on the effect of e-

learning on higher

education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 20–26.

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i4.3465

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review.

Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 157–190.

https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

19

LAMPIRAN

Postgraduate Students’ Perspective on Supporting “Learning From Home” to Solve the COVID-19 Pandemics

Ihsana El Khuluqoa and Abdul Rahman A. Ghanib

AHead of Education Management Administration Programme, Graduate School Muhammadiyah University Prof. DR,

HAMKA, [email protected], Indonesia; b Graduate School Muhammadiyah University Prof. DR, HAMKA,

[email protected], Indonesia;

It is very important to study this topic because it is a novel education process applied in the

postgraduate program in UHAMKA. The objective of this present research was to reveal how the postgraduate

student perceive of or respond to the online learning process. A mixed method between qualitative and

quantitative ones was adopted in this present research. The research results showed that most students

who had experienced of the online learning activities encountered some obstacles because they had

never conducted “LFH (Learning From Home) activities before. The respondents were 428

postgraduate students who actively joined in the “LFH” activities. From the students, 316 students

used the platform zoom as the supporting application in the LFH activities. The respondents filled in

the Google Form, then the collected data could be quickly and accurately processed. Other

respondents preferred the google classroom, the whatsapp and other applications in following the

learning activities according to the agreement and features provided in each flat form. There were

408 respondents stating that there was a two-way communication between the lecturers and the

students during the LFH activities. They stated that the limited Internet network hindered the online

lecturing. Thirty one respondents declared that technology limitations hampered the online

lecturing, and 105 students revealed that it is the limitations in using the application that caused

the online lecturing to become obstacles.

Keywords: Covid-19,LFH, E-Learning

Introduction COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019 ) has given great impacts on the whole life lines of the society,

including the education sector. The teaching and learning process of the students throughout the archipelago

was disturbed since President Joko Widodo announced the first case of the first patient suffering from the

COVID-19 on March 2, 2020. The government has appealed that the education activities should be

implemented from home using the Internet so that the education process can go on and the students get their

education rights.

In line with the government’s appeal to working from home, learning at home and worshipping at home,

the Graduate School, Muhammadiyah University Prof. DR. HAMKA has been participating in changing the

system of the face-to-face teaching-learning activities into the Internet-based learning at home. Each session

will be noted in detail in terms of the lecturing materials and the number of students joining in the online class.

Each lecturer is obliged to report his/her online lecturing every day.

In line with the technology development, there are many platforms providing services to undergo online

lecturing so that learning activities still go on. However, this does not mean that there is no obstacle. Some

hindering factors in joining in the learning from homes activities are as follows: 1) limited networks caused

by geographic locations so that it is difficult to access the online lecturing platforms, 2) limited networks, that

20

cause some difficulties in accessing the online lecturing platforms since it needs big enough data. This adds the

burden to the students.

(Sher, 2009) Technology in the field of education in the form of Web technology has now begun to be utilized

in the learning process slowly began to change the face of education. The World Wide Web has become a useful

learning medium and has given students new learning experiences that were previously impossible. In a web-

based environment, anytime and anywhere, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, students with the help of an internet

connection, can receive instructions, arrange and submit assignments, and ask questions to instructors and

their fellow students. They can actively participate in class discussions from the nearest home, office or

computer laboratory.

This present research was focused on the postgraduate students’ opinions about the internet-based learning

conducted during the COVID-19 emergency period. The internet-based learning or learning from homes

activities have strengths and weaknesses that may be directly felt by all students so that they may present their

real perspectives based on their experiences in joining in the lecturing from home activities.

Literature review A. State of the Art

Due to the technology advancement in education, face-to-face interactions in learning activities are

not a must in the teaching and learning practices. This technology advancement has opened boundaries

among the students and the teachers in terms of space and time. Learning that should always done in a

room in a predetermined time can now be conducted anywhere and anytime as long as there is an interned

connection.

(Browne et al., 2017) The concept of students as creators or pioneers involves students directly in

the learning process by asking them to contribute using digital media to design learning activities, for

development as 21st century learners

One of the technology limitations in the world of education is the ability to use the technology

maximally. Almost all students posses the technology in the forms of smartphones and laptops to support

the learning activities in this era, but technical hindrances often happen during the use of the technology.

This technical hindrances may be internal factors such as one’s incompetence in using it or internal factors

namely unstable internet or other factors out of the ability of the technology owners.

(Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, 2016) Research from various sources shows the fact

that problems related to learning and technology do not originate from device errors, but are smooth in the

use of these devices.

(Oliver & Goerke, 2007)Just having a device does not guarantee that the owner can use the device

to its full potential. Statistics on technology ownership in Australian universities collected over a decade

ago show that most students have smartphones and / or tablets, and most have access to desktop and laptop

computers

The impacts from the education technology from the positive side are greatly useful in the COVID-

19 pandemics condition where when the government has determined to learn, work, and worship from

home, students and teachers still connect one another. The teaching and learning activities may go on

regardless of the distance. The teachers can directly communicate with the parents in order help monitor

the students during the learning from home activities.

Some researchers consider an important element in student learning interactions overall, the level

of success in managing distance education (A Taxonomy of Factors to Promote Quality Web-Supported

Learning 1 Jill W. Fresen (PhD), University of Pretoria, South Africa, 2007; Burnett et al., 2007; Kim et

al., 2005) interactions between students and interactions between instructors and students as "educational

transactions" (p.1) there is transactional distance in the distance learning environment because instructors

and learners do not interact in the same physical and temporal space.

(Nielsen et al., 2017) Digital media has now been used in education for learning through inquiry

approaches (Reyna & Meier, 2020) Students' perceptions about assignments through digital media have

been very positive since 2015. Validated evaluation questionnaires show positive student results for digital

21

media support, attitudes towards technology, task understanding, knowledge construction and digital media

for learning and careers

(Sun & Chen, 2016) “distance education is teaching and planned learning in which teaching

normally occurs in a different place from learning, requiring communication through technologies as well

as special institutional organization”

(Crawford-Ferre, Heather GlynnWiest, Lynda R., 2012) Online learning can be implemented

effectively when supported by the quality of the faculty. Online learning should have training related to

online design and instruction. The training that must be held is adequate in the technology that applies to

online teaching: How to use the online system and of course Soft- Ware, knowing what to do and who to

contact when certain technological problems occur.

(Iqbal & Ahmad, 2010) For many developing countries, e-Learning is regarded as a solution to

meet the growing demand for higher education. In Pakistan, online education is promoted as "Education

for all" because it aims to reach students who live too far away from the city where higher education is

implemented and can not afford to pay conventional higher education costs.(Ngampornchai & Adams,

2016) e-learning solves the problems of large classrooms, increasing enrollment, and limited staff.

B. Distance Learning

All students in Indonesia and throughout the world do not do the teaching and learning activities

as usual. The COVID-19 pandemics compels the government to make a regulation to “Learn from Home”

to reduce the danger of the transmission of the corona viruses. These viruses not only threaten the students

but also all school citizens, as a result, the teaching and learning activities are implemented under the

COVID-19.

Distance learning is not peculiar in the world of education. However, the COVID-19 pandemics

affects all sectors of education so that they should apply the online-based distance learning system.

Certainly, this gives positive and negative impacts for various parties on the continuation of the teaching

and learning process.

(Boud & Soler, 2016) The emergence of technological renewal and the adoption of digital

technology to the world of education creates a breath of fresh new opportunities for educators to think

creatively about assessment and improve long-term educational goals. (Ferrell, 2014) Bearing in mind the

emergence of various skills and abilities that might be possible in a digital context - including the ease - of

ease of doing online learning or online examinations (Ferrell 2014)

(Darmayanti et al., 2007) The concept of learning in high education is always imagined in face-to-

face-sessions with the students in the same room under the traditional view. A new paradigm appears in

terms of the teaching and learning process. Under this new paradigm, face-to-face sessions in the same

room are not necessary. The appearance of the internet technology overthrows the old paradigm where the

teaching and learning process should be implemented in one same room and through face-to-face sessions.

At present, the teaching and learning process can be done anywhere regardless of the space and time.

Learning activities can be held anytime and anywhere because of the information technology

advancement in the form of the Internet. Various online learning media are available to support the learning

process without face-to-face session in the same environment and it is the positive side from the impacts

of the internet technology advancement. However, the learning activities through internet need a certain

management system that enables the teachers to transfer their knowledge to the students properly and

thoroughly.

Distance learning known as online learning/e-learning has existed and being applied since 1980s.

(Harasim, 2000) The first online course was conducted in 1981, and the first online program was

established by the Western behavior Sciences Institute in the year 1982. This distance learning was

implemented because of a condition of geographical condition between teachers and students.

(Nugroho, 2012) Distance learning need interactive learning media to take attention from the

students. Then, in the mid of the 20th century, efforts to develop infrastructures or learning media advanced

as signaled by the use of visual tools completed with audio equipment. Therefore, an audio-visual

equipment was established. One of the depictions that are mostly used as a reference as the theoretical

basis for the use of media in the learning process is Dale’s Cone of Experience.

22

(Palvia et al., 2018) Web-based learning or online education change the way we perform teaching

and learning. Changes in education models happen very quickly. All institutions around the world adapt to

this change, a highly dynamic educational landscape has generated a great interest among researchers,

educators, administrators, policymakers, publishers, and businesses.

(Uri, 2005) Criticisms related to deficiencies found in offline testing can be masked by online exams.

(Muller et al., 2019) Although a number of exams can be carried out on a computer-based online basis, but

most of the exams must still be of a traditional nature (eg books that are physically inaccessible, closed

books), this can be a distinct advantage because it allows candidates to take the exam at a time or place

they choose, or facilitate access to online resources.

Technology really brings positive impacts in terms of time efficiency but its use should be

habituated. While, the weakness from using technology to support distance learning is especially felt by

the elderly students and the people with lower middle economy who have not any technology to support the

implementation of the distance learning process through the internet or online learning activities.

Seeing many technological opportunities in providing convenience in the consistency of service in

education, the whole world began to explore technology with the subject of students and other stakeholders

(for example (Gašević et al., 2016; Gelan et al., 2018; Herodotou et al., 2017; Rienties & Toetenel, 2016;

Tait, 2018)

(Boud & Soler, 2016)Technological advances offer insights on learning experiences and online

assessments both students and teachers (Study, 2009) for example, referring to technology digital as a tool

that can be used to 'change' an existing system. whereas (Allan, 2020) say that technology brings a focus

on the possibility of increasing efficiency while 'maintaining the reliability and durability of traditional

methods'

The use of technology surely brings very tempting excellence. But it does not mean that its its

implementation it does not cause pros and cons among the members of the society. Misunderstanding and

evasiveness to new things become cons in implementing the technology in the sector of education.

Like other media, web-based instruction is not free from criticism. There are several relating to:

time-intensive commitment to develop and take web-based courses, lack of face-to-face interaction between

students and their instructors, quality of education relative to class-based courses (Arbaugh, 2000), feelings

of isolation among students (Weller, 2007), and lower level of online learners' completion rate. Others

argue that the lack of face-to-face physical interaction is one of the main limitations in distance education

because students and instructors are physically separated from each other and of course communication is

mediated through internet communication tools. This physical separation has obstacles in terms of

communication (Sorensen & Baylen, 1999) because many non-verbal cues such as eye contact and facial

expressions are lost.

Previous researches discussed in detail the history of E-Learning and the process of distance

learning. The present researchers examined the online-based distance learning through the students’

perspectives under the COVID-19 pandemics condition.

Methods The type of research conducted by the researchers was a field research where a mixed methodology was

employed. A mixed method results in more comprehensive facts in answering the research problems.

Therefore, the present researchers possessed some freedoms to make use of all instruments to collect the data

in line with the types of data needed. While quantitative or qualitative method is merely limited to the type of

certain instruments for the data collection.

Therefore, in this present research a Mix Method was adopted. The Mix Method can delineate research

results that accurately refer to data given by the students dealing with their perspective on the supports to

Learning From Home activities to solve the COVIC-19 pandemics condition.

The researchers used the google platform to obtain students’ opinions concerning with their perspectives of

the online-based distance learning process. This platform was used to get quantitative data. After the

quantitative data were collected, the researchers would describe the data findings using the qualitative method.

It is this mix that became the researchers to choose the mixed method.

23

Participants

The respondents of this research were students of Graduate School Muhammadiyah University PROF. DR.

HAMKA consisting of 9 (nine) study programs. The respondents were selected using a stipulation that the

students had joined in the online-based distance learning.

The number of participants was 428 students/respondents consisting of 9 (nine) study programs in Graduate

School Muhammadiyah University PROF. DR. HAMKA with the details as presented in the following table.

Results

On the basis of the diagram above, it is shown that there were 316 respondents using the flat form

zoom as the supporting application in the online-based distance learning process. Whereas, other respondents

preferred to using the google classroom, the whatsapp and other applications in conducting the learning

activities through the agreement and features provided bu each flat form.

020406080

100120140160180

Study Program

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

zoom

Google Classroom

Whatsapp

Schoology

Email

E-learning

Skype

24

From the diagram, it is known that there were 3012 respondents stating that the lecturers

implemented their online-based distance learning or the online lecturing on time in accordance with the

schedule.

It is also shown that 398 respondents stated that the lecturers continually gave individual or group

tasks each time they did their online lecturing or their online-based distance learning.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Strongly Agree Agree doubtful disagree

Teaching Schedule

Strongly Agree

Agree

Doubtful

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Task

25

The data also revealed that there were 408 respondents stating that there was a two-way

communication between the lecturers and the students during online lecturing or their online-based distance

learning activities.

Four hundred and twelve (412) respondents said that during online lecturing or online-based distance

learning, some significant obstacles that disturbed the learning process occurred.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Strongly Agree Agree Doubtful Disagree Strongly Disagree

2-way Communication

Strongly Agree

Agree

Doubtful

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0 50 100 150 200 250

Obstacle in Online Learning

Strongly Agree Agree Doubtful Disagree Strongly Disagree

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Internet Network Limitations Technological Limitations Aplication MasteryLimitations

26

There were 304 respondents revealing that the limited internet became the hindrance in doing the

online lecturing. Thirty one (31) respondents stated technology obstacles hindered the online lecturing, and

105 respondents said that the limitation of the use of the application hampered the online lecturing.

Conclusion From the results of the first diagram, it is shown that 316 respondents used the flat form zoom as the

supporting application the online-based distance learning process. While other respondents chose to use the google

classroom, the whatsspp and other applications in executing the learning activities through the agreement and

based on the features provided by each flat form. In the next diagram, dealing with the online lecturing or online-

based distance learning process it is presented that there were 302 respondents stating that the lecturers did their

tasks on time in line with the schedule. Three hundred and ninety eight (398) respondents said that their lecturers

gave the tasks continually. There were 408 respondents saying that a two-way communication existed between

the lecturers and the students. Four hundred and twelve (412) respondents stated that some significant obstacles

disturbed the learning process, and 304 respondents said the the limited internet hampered the learning process.

Meanwhile, 31 respondents stated that that the limited technology hindered the learning process. At last there

were 105 respondents saying that the limited use of applications became the hindrances in implementing the

learning process.

References A Taxonomy of Factors to Promote Quality Web-Supported Learning 1 Jill W. Fresen (PhD), University of Pretoria, South

Africa. (2007). 6(3), 351–362.

Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M. (2016). Digital Literacy An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief. Scientific

American, 273(3), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0995-190

Allan, S. (2020). Migration and transformation: A sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams.

Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2279

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses. Journal

of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290002400104

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–

413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133

Browne, C., Mendoza, A., Sindermann, A., & Holland, B. (2017). Students as Co-creators of an Online Learning Resource.

Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(21).

Burnett, K., Bonnici, L. J., Miksa, S. D., & Kim, J. (2007). Frequency , Intensity and Topicality in Online Learning : An

Exploration of the Interaction Dimensions that Contribute to Student Satisfaction in Online Learning. 48(1), 21–36.

Crawford-Ferre, Heather GlynnWiest, Lynda R. (2012). Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education. Quarterly Review of

Distance Education, 13(1), 11–14.

Darmayanti, T., Setiani, M. Y., & Oetojo, B. (2007). E-Learning pada pendidikan jarak jauh: konsep yang mengubah metode

pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 8, 99–113.

Ferrell, G. (2014). Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA): a landscape review. August, 46.

http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/5599/

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects

of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet and Higher Education, 28(June 2019), 68–84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002

Gelan, A., Fastré, G., Verjans, M., Martin, N., Janssenswillen, G., Creemers, M., Lieben, J., Depaire, B., & Thomas, M. (2018).

Affordances and limitations of learning analytics for computer-assisted language learning: a case study of the VITAL

project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1418382

Harasim, L. (2000). Harasim2000. 3, 41–61.

27

27

Herodotou, C., Zdrahal, Z., Rienties, B., Hlosta, M., Boroowa, A., & Naydenova, G. (2017). Implementing predictive learning

analytics on a large scale: The teacher’s perspective. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, July 2018,

267–271. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027397

Iqbal, M. J., & Ahmad, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of education through e-learning: The case study of Allama Iqbal Open

University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.23439

Kim, K., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students ’ perceptions of online learning : Benefits , challenges , and

suggestions. 8, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.09.005

Muller, K., Gradel, K., Forte, M., Mccabe, R., Pickett, A. M., Piorkowski, R., Scalzo, K., & Sullivan, R. (2019). Assessing

Student Learning in the Online Modality. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA), 40, 1.

Nielsen, W., Hoban, G., & Hyland, C. J. T. (2017). Pharmacology students’ perceptions of creating multimodal digital

explanations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00244g

Nugroho, A. (2012). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Web. Jurnal Transformatika, 9(2), 72.

https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v9i2.60

Oliver, B., & Goerke, V. (2007). Australian undergraduates’ use and ownership of emerging technologies: Implications and

opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational

Technology, 23(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1263

Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online Education: Worldwide

Status, Challenges, Trends, and Implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(4), 233–

241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262

Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2020). Co-creation of knowledge using mobile technologies and digital media as pedagogical devices

in undergraduate STEM education. Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2356

Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A

cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60(July), 333–341.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.074

Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and

satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120.

Sorensen, C., & Baylen, D. M. (1999). Interaction in Interactive Television Instruction: Perception versus Reality. 1999

Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Montreal, Canada, 150.

Study, A. C. (2009). Utilizing Online Exams : 6(8), 1–8.

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information

Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

Tait, A. (2018). Open Universities: the next phase. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(1), 13–23.

https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-12-2017-0040

Uri, E. (2005). Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students ’ Learning.

Weller, M. (2007). The distance from isolation. Why communities are the logical conclusion in e-learning. Computers and

Education, 49(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.015