Upload
salman-agha
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 pil-synopsis.docx
1/4
INTRODUCTION
Self-determination is the right of groups to "determine their political status and freely pursue
their economic, social, and cultural development."' Although the emergence of new sovereign
entities was not initially a concern of international law, decolonization necessitated the
emergence of new international law in the form of rules for self-determination. Much like
there are legal guidelines for passing domestic statutes in the United States, there are
international legal requirements for resolving self-determination conflicts. The use of legal
norms such as earned sovereignty and plebiscites legalizes the process of recognizing
emerging independent states or, in the alternative, recognizing the sovereign rights attributed
to sub-states. Earned sovereignty provides the legal framework for resolution and addresses
international legal status, and the plebiscite ensures that the framework attains legal status
only after popular consultation of the people.' The conflict in Kashmir is a fight for self-
determination, a recognized right in international law. Until recently, the international legal
community had not come up with the legal framework to reach a solution. From the
beginning of the Kashmir conflict, the involved parties argued that the appropriate solution
was a plebiscite, a direct vote whereby the government gives the people the right to accept or
refuse a particular proposal. The parties claimed that a plebiscite' would illustrate the will of
the people. The actions of Pakistan and India, however, have negated any possibility of self-determination. The international community's attitude toward the Kashmir plebiscite was to
ignore it and retain the status quo.' This attitude has changed as the danger of the situation has
escalated since India and Pakistan became nuclear powers." Neither of the parties rules out
the use of nuclear weapons, and Pakistan does not deny the possibility of a first strike.
Recent alterations in regional politics, along with changing worldviews on terrorism, may
soon open the door for a final solution to the Kashmir conflict.
Scope
This project will firstly examine the developments on the issue that have taken place during
the course of time. Then, the legal framework envisaged by the U.N. Charter, ICCPR and
other Covenants. This work will refer to various court decisions, GA resolutions, and
scholars arguments in this respect. In the second part it will examine the historical and
current situation in Kashmir. Finally, a study on the exercise of the right of self-determination
with special reference to Kashmir issue will be presented in comparison with classical and
modern requirements for the exercise of the said right.
7/29/2019 pil-synopsis.docx
2/4
Chapterisation
Part-I
The development and nature of right of self-determination
1) Origin and historical background2) Content and nature of self-determination3) Convention and legal framework4) Current issues
Part-II
Kashmir Issue: Historical background and Current Scenario
1) History and time line of events2) Conflict: Act of terrorism, Human right violations etc.3) Recent developments and International interventions
Part-III
Analysis
1) A study of development of right of self-determination in other parts of the world andconsequently its impact on Kashmir.
Part-IV
Conclusion and Recommendation
Research Questions:-
1) What are the meaning, objective and purpose of the right of self-determination? 2) What is the status of right of self-determination in International Community? 3) What is the implication of right of self-determination over Kashmir Issue?
Bibliography:-
UN era 88 American Journal of International Law (1994)
Khan, Fakiha, Nuking Kashmir: Legal Implications of Nuclear Testing by Pakistan and India
in the Context of the Kashmir Dispute 29 The Geogria Journal ofBooks:
Addo, Michael K., International human rights law (Adershot: Ashgate, 2001)
Alston, Philip and Crawford, Alston, ed., The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty
Monitoring (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
Banton, Michael P. International action against racial discrimination (Oxford: Clarendon
Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)
7/29/2019 pil-synopsis.docx
3/4
Bayefsky, Anne, Self-determination in International Law: Quebec and Lessons Learned
(Hague: Kluwar Law International, 2000)
Cassese, Antonio, International Law, 2ed., (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Cassese, Antonio, self- Determination of Peoples (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1995)
Cassese, Antonio, International Law and indigenous peoples (Leiden; Boston: M. Nijhoff,
2005)
McWhinney, Edward, The United Nations and a new World Order for a new millennium:
Self-determination, State succession, and humanitarian intervention (The Hague; Boston:
Kluwer Law International, 2000)
Moore, Margaret, ed., Self-Determination and Secession (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1998)
Musgrave, Thomas D., Self-determination and national minorities (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, (1997)
Nesiah, Devanesan, Discrimination with Reason? The Policy of reservations in the United
States, India and
Articles:
Anaya,S. J., A Contemporary Definition of the International Norms of Self-Determination
3Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems (1993)
Brilmayer, L., Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation 16 Yale
Journal of International Law (1991)
F. L., The Degrees of Self-Determination in the International and Comparative Law (2001)
Kolodner, Eric, The Future of the Right to self-Determination 10 Connecticut Journal of
International Law (1994)
Koskenniemi, M., National Self-Determination today: Problems of Legal Theory and
Practice 43 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1994)
Lea, Brilmayer, Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation 16 Yale
Journal of International Law 177(1991)
R. Emerson, Self-determination American Journal of International Law, 65 (1971)
7/29/2019 pil-synopsis.docx
4/4
UN Documents:
Human Rights Committee
General Comment No. 12 The right to Self- Determination of Peoples (Art 1):. 13/03/84
CCPR General Comment No. 12 (General Comments)
General Comment No. 21 General Recommendation No.21: Right to Self- Determination:.
23/08/96
CERD General Comment No. 21 (General Comments)