Plenary 1_Cao Manh Cuong

7/31/2019 Plenary 1_Cao Manh Cuong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/plenary-1cao-manh-cuong 1/36

Strengthening and Use of Country Safeguards Systems

Sharing Experience – Strengthening Partnerships

, - ,

Strengthening Country Systemsfor Aid Effectiveness in Viet Nam

Cao Manh CuongDeputy Director GeneralFERD/MPI

Development Bank (ADB), or its Board of Governors, or the government they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracyof the data included in this presentation and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Terminology used maynot necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.



PART I. AID EFFECTIVENESS VIET NAMPART II. DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS

. COUNTRY SAFEGUARD SYSTEM



PART I. AID EFFECTIVENESS VIET NAM



Global Aid Effectiveness Journey

Dili Declarationon fragile states

(2010)Korea HLF

–

Accra Agenda for Action

. 1 Dec. 2011)

2008

Bogota Statement

Paris Declaration on

Aid

Monterrey Consensus

Harmonisation (2003)

on SSC (2010)

Effectiveness (2005)

(2002) 4



PARIS DECLARATION ON AID EFFECTIVENESS (PD)

56 Commitments and 12 Targets56 Commitments and 12 Targets



HANOI CORE STATEMENT (HCS)LOCALIZED PD TO VIETNAMESE CONTEXT

PARTNERSHIP GROUP ON AID EFFECTIVENESS (PGAE) (2004-2010)



WHAT CONTAINS IN HCS?

• HCS is the joint commitment of the GoV and DonorCommunity at the country level to implement PD inViet Nam.

• “Localizing” means that the contents, indicators and

targets of the PD are selected with fine-tuning to

feasibility and success of implementation in acountry context.

• HCS contains 28 Partnership Commitments and 14Indicators around the 5 PD key principles.



PD vs HCS MONITORING INDICATORS

, -

HCS equivalent

#8 - EIA / SIA (Environmental & social safeguard

indicator) #10 - Common project tools

#12 – Aid delegation



PD/HCS/AAA IMPLEMENTATION IN VIET NAM



KEY ACTIVITIES

1. Organizational Structure

2. Communication Strategy

3. Thematic studies for Policies Dialogues

4. PD/HCS Monitoring and Evaluation Framework



1. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

CG

Aid EffectivenessForum Events

Anti-corruptionForum

VietnamBusiness Forum

Aid Effectiveness Forum

Thematic Groups (TGs)

Dual Track:Aid Effectiveness and Development Effectiveness



2. COMMUNICATION STRATEGY

.

Prime Minister, MPI disseminated thespirit and contents of HCS to the Line

the publication of HCS and AAA –

Questions and Answers Book).. ee ng w a ec or ar ners p

Groups and International SupportGroup.

3. Develop the HCS CommunicationStrategy.

Communication



2. THEMATIC STUDIES FOR POLICY DIALOGUES

Establishment of GoV-Donor Co-chairing Thematic Groups (TGs):

1. Procurement2. Public Financial Management (PFM)

3. Social and Environment Impact Assessment (EIA andSIA)

4. ODA-on-bud et

5. Cost Norms

6. HCS Communication

. The outcomes of policy dialogues are regularly updated in the

Aid Effectiveness Report at the Mid-term and Annual CGs



3. PD/HCS MONITORING AND EVALUATION

1. Conduct baseline surve 2005 to define the

current status and the gaps to the indicativetargets in HCS.

2. Conduct HCS Independence Monitoring (2007.

3. In cooperation with OECD-DAC to carry out

Phase I and Phase II of PD/HCS Evaluation(2008 and 2010) and PD/HCS Monitoring

, , , .



GLOBAL PD MONITORING AND EVALUATION



Monitoring and evaluating

2005: Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness

Five principles,56 commitments

... and agreement to monitor and evaluate

indicatorsto monitor

.



Have the 2010 targets been met?,

1. Operational Development Strategies

2010 Target2005 Baseline

75%19% 50%

2a. Reliable Public Financial Management (PFM) systems

3. Aid flows are aligned on national priorities

50%38%

85%44%43%

51%4. trengt en capac ty y co-or nate support

5a. Use of country PFM systems

6. Strengthen capacity by avoiding Parallel PIUs

54%40% 47%

5651 696 1 145

49%

7. Aid is more predictable

8. Aid is untied

71%42%40%

>87%87%89%

9. Use of common arrangements or procedures

10a. Joint missions

10b. Joint country analytic work

66%

40%

43%

20%

41%

46%

22%

44%

11. Results-oriented frameworks

12. Mutual accountability

38%7% 25%

100%44% 48%



VIET NAM: RESULTS OF 2011 PD MONITORING SURVEY



PD/HCS MONITORING SURVEY 2011

Indicators

Paris Declaration

Baseline

Progress in 2007

2010

1: Ownership B-rating AER (World Bank)

a: ua y o -po n s or an

2b: Quality of procurement

systems

D-level OECD-DAC

3: Alignment to nationalpriorities

81% 80% 93%

4: Co-ordinated capacity

eve opmen5a: Use of GoV PFM

system32% 63% 62%

5b: Use of GoVprocurement system

33% 56% 65%



PD/HCS MONITORING SURVEY 2011

Par is Dec lara t ion

2005

Baseline Progress in 2007

Achievement for

2010

6: Avoiding parallel PMUs 111 58 16

7: Aid is more predictable 78% 70% 90%

8: Aid is increasingly untied --- --- ---

9: Use of common

procedures

10a: Joint mission 10% 20% 16%

11: Performancemeasurement frameworks

- AER (World Bank)

Annual assessment/12: Mutual accountability - independent

monitoring



Environmental Safeguard Indicator

HCS Commit ment : GoV and donors improve

env ronmen a an soc a sa eguar s eve op specia ize

technical and policy capacity and enforcement of legislation )

n ca or a: ercen o nv ronmen a mpac

Assessments (EIAs undertaken for individual projects such

, ,

implemented to international standards and using

government systems

2010 Target : At least 100% of EIAs under donor-funded

projects implemented to international standards and at least

30% of these carried out using government systems.



Social Safeguard Indicator

HCS Commit ment : GoV and donors improve

environmental and social safeguards (develop specialized

technical and policy capacity and enforcement of legislation )

I ndicator 8b: Percent of Social Impact Assessments

(SIAs relate to issues of resettlement and ethnic minority

to international standards and using government

s stems

2010 Target : At least 100% of SIAs under donor-funded

projects implemented to international standards and at least

30% of these carried out using government systems.



HCS Indicator 8: EIAs & SIAs

2010achievement

8a. GoV and donors 9% b number of EIAs 35%improveenvironmental

safe uards EIA 64% with additional 15%

0.4% by number of28%

. o an onorsimprove socialsafeguards (SIA)

s

82% with additionalsafeguards



Ind icator 8a: 2005-2010 Progress

(30%)• Donors support

environment safeguardthrough EIA TWG

• Note: 49 EIAs surveyed in 2010



Recent EIA initiatives

aw on nv ronmen a ro ec on , ecree

80/2006 & Circular 005/2008

As part of the Law on Environmental Protection

Decree 29 2011 on EIA-SEA & Circular 26 2011

SEA for Socio-economic Development Strategies,Master Plans, Plans

or e ores ry sec or, e c.

Capacity building, EIA technical guidelines



Ind icator 8b: 2005-2010 Progress

• Almost achieved2010 target (30%)

• Gaps & DPsafeguard measures

• Note: 29 SIAs surve ed in 2010



EIA and SIA Harmonization Efforts with

the 6 Banks ADB, AfD, JICA, KEXIM, KfW WB

.Programmes and Projects between the GoV and 6 Banks in thegiven period (2008 – 2009 and 2010 – 2011) and results of JointPorfolio Performance Reviews JPPRs between the GovernmentODA Inter-ministerial Taskforce (IMTF) and the 6 Banks.

2. The Joint Action Plans consists of specific actions with agencies in-charge, deadlines and monitoring indicators.

3. The 6 Banks are also the champions in the EIA and SIA Thematic

roups un er e ormer ar ners p roup on ec veness(PGAE) and currently the Aid Effectiveness Forum (AEF).



VIET NAM: RESULTS OF 2011 PD/HCS EVALUATION



Ke Achievements

1. Strong Government ownership and leadership inthe development agenda.

2. Significant progress in alignment of development.

3. Improvement in aid predictability and the reduction

of number of parallel PMUs.. oo progress n anagemen or eve opmenResults (MfDR)

5. Strong mutual accountability structures



Constraints and Challen es1. Lack of connection between planning and budgeting

. .

3. Aid is still fragmented (PBA, DoL, aid predictability)4. Challenges in harmonization and alignment

(international standards) (get down to technical level).

5. Constraint in ca acit at sub-national level.6. Lack of joint programming,delegated cooperation,

joint missions and analytical works among DPs..

effectiveness and development effectiveness.



PART II. DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS



.

opportunity for Viet Nam to integrate Aid Effectivenessinto the development.

2. In the Post-Bussan period, Viet Nam is committed to

work with develo ment artners to further im rovecountry systems. Safeguard systems are very high onboth the aid effectiveness and development

.



Remaining Challenges

1. Though a lot of progress has been made in the country safeguard

and the need for donor support

systems the gaps between the Government and DPs and between

the country and international standards or good practices in termsof the policies and institutional framework and the capacitycons ra n s s ex s a requ re e con nue suppor s romdonors.

.obstacle to harmonization and alignment and reducing the spill-over impacts.



ON COUNTRY SAFEGUARD SYSTEM



Next Step and Initiatives

1. In line with the commitments of the Bussan Partnership Document, out - out an “tr angu ar” cooperat on nee s to e

promoted in efforts of strengthening Partnership on SafeguardSystems, specially through the Global Building Blocks on Better

.

2. In the Asia – Pacific region a kind of network or a community of

exchange of experiences.



THANK YOU

Documents

Plenary 1_Cao Manh Cuong