ProConInt(11)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 ProConInt(11)

    1/2

    Pros & Cons of Interviewing

    1) Direct feedback from respondent You are assured that the responses are from theperson intended

    2) Opportunity to probe Verbal or nonverbal prompts to encourage morecomplete, better explained responses

    3) Can use observation as anotherevaluation method

    Recording what you physically observe during theinterview provides additional information for youroverall assessment as you experience both theaffective and cognitive aspects of the responses

    4) Yields rich data, details and new

    insights

    Allows respondents to describe what is

    meaningful or important to them using their ownwords

    May be able to obtain information that issensitive due to the conversational tone aninterview can have

    May be able to use a quote as an effectivetestimonial or to further illustrate a statistic

    5) Personal interaction withrespondent

    Rapport can be developed with the interviewee

    Respondent may feel more relaxed and candid

    6) Topics can be explored in depth By using probes, interviews can shed light on thedetails of a particular response

    7) Flexibility Interviews can be conducted in a variety oflocations and times

    Interviews can be adapted to particular individualsand circumstances

    Interviewers can utilize their knowledge, expertise

    and interpersonal skills to further exploreunintended ideas or themes raised by therespondent that relates to the purpose

    AD

    VANTAGES

    8) Opportunity to explain or clarifyquestions

    Explaining or clarifying questions increases theaccuracy of the data collected

  • 8/2/2019 ProConInt(11)

    2/2

    1) Time-consuming Scheduling the interview, conducting theinterview, and inputting notes for analysis takestime

    2) Interviewers need to be prepared Training interviewers may be necessary.Ensuring that the interviewer has knowledge ofthe subject matter, feels confident in his/her abilityto conduct the interview, and to record responsesare examples of where additional technicalassistance or training can improve the overallinterviewing process

    3) Interviewer error or bias Factors such as tone of voice, the way a questionmay be rephrased, voicing an opinion, inadequatenote taking, even the gender and appearance of

    the interviewer may lead to errors and bias

    4) Flexibility Too much flexibility can result in inconsistenciesacross interviews. Variation in interview settingsdecreases control over the environment.

    5) Analysis may be difficult Interviews can produce a lot of data in a shortamount of time. It is critical to have an analysisplan before you conduct the interviews toimprove the data entry and analysis

    Results are more subjective

    DISADVANTAGES

    6) Costly Interviews are expensive in the amount of timerequired to train, schedule, conduct, input dataand analyze.

    Adapted from the Text: User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluation, chapter 3, Mahoney, Colleen, 1997Inter Views: An Introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Kvale S., 1996

    Prepared by Ed Minter, Regional Evaluation Specialist, Local Program Evaluation.

    University of Wisconsin-Extension, Program Development & Evaluation. February 2003