(10) The city government filed a complaint for expropriation of 10 lots to build a recreational complex for the members of the homeowners' association of Sitio Sto. Tomas, the most populated residential compound in the city. The lot owners challenged the purpose of the expropriation. Does the expropriation have a valid purpose?(A) No, because not everybody uses a recreational complex.(B)No, because it intends to benefit a private organization.(C) Yes, it is in accord with the general welfare clause.(D) Yes, it serves the well-being of the local residents.