Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This is a repository copy of Real Driving Emissions (RDE): Results from the 2015 remote sensing campaigns (UK).
White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/93928/
Version: Published Version
Conference or Workshop Item:Tate, JE Real Driving Emissions (RDE): Results from the 2015 remote sensing campaigns (UK). In: Routes to Clean Air, Air Quality Conference 2015, 22-23 Oct 2015, Bristol, UK. (Unpublished)
[email protected]://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/
Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.
Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
On road emissions: Results from
latest remote sensing campaign
Dr James Tate
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK
CONTENTS
2
Ⴇ Remote sensing Real Driving Emissions (RDE) Method Verification
Ⴇ Results 2015 EuroVI
Passenger carsHGVsᅟ LGVsᅟ Buses
Ⴇ Manufacturer comparison | Diesel passenger cars
Ⴇ Recommendations
METHOD
3
METHODVerification of speed & acceleration measurements
4
v = speed, a = acceleration, = road gradient
METHODVerification of concentration measurements
5
Distribution of the measurement distribution of a controlled gas mixture with known relativeabundances.The binned data shows the measurements with the solid line showing a Normaldistribution derived from the measured data (solid) and theoretical (dashed).
METHODInter-comparison of two Remote Sensing Devices
6
Emission ratios
From peak exhaust plume conc.
態態潮牒凋寵彫脹超 態態Predict NO2 and total NOXcontribution using f-NO2 reported
by Carslaw (2014)
Camera(Number plate)
Vehicle Detector(Speed andAcceleration)
Source/Detector
Mirror Box
Source
Detector
Emissions Analyser(Common
Configurations)
Camera(Number plate)
Vehicle Detector(Speed andAcceleration)
Source/Detector
Mirror Box
Source
Detector
Emissions Analyser(Common
Configurations)
METHODMeasurements
ESP RSD-4600 instrument
www.esp-global.com
7 Carslaw, D., Priestman, M. 2014. Analysis of the 2013 vehicle emission remote sensing campaigns data. King�s College London, Finaldraft, 10th November 2014
Euro Standard Petrol f-NO2 Diesel f-NO2Euro 0 2 8
Euro 1 2 8
Euro 2 3 8
Euro 3 4 16
Euro 4 7 26
Euro 5 12 26
Euro 6 12 34
METHODEstimation of Emission Factors
8
継警荊鯨鯨荊頚軽�繋畦系劇頚迎� 訣堅┻ 倦兼貸怠 眺聴帖 =軽頚諜系頚態 眺聴帖 × 系頚態倦兼 暢凋朝腸 × 系剣堅堅結潔建件剣券�繋欠潔建剣堅 彫寵寵脹
2000
2005
2010
2015
120
140
160
180
200
220
Year of registration
CO
2(grams.km
1)
https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Impact-of-real-world-driving-emissions-for-UK-cars-and-vans.pdf
EuroVI
Passengercars,Spring/Summer2015
9
Diesel_E0
Diesel_E1
Diesel_E2
Diesel_E3
Diesel_E4
Diesel_E5
Diesel_E6
Petrol_E0
Petrol_E1
Petrol_E2
Petrol_E3
Petrol_E4
Petrol_E5
Petrol_E6
Hybrid_E4
Hybrid_E5
Hybrid_E6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
NO X (grams.km1)
EuroVI
Passengercars,Spring/Summer2015
10
Diesel_E0
Diesel_E1
Diesel_E2
Diesel_E3
Diesel_E4
Diesel_E5
Diesel_E6
Petrol_E0
Petrol_E1
Petrol_E2
Petrol_E3
Petrol_E4
Petrol_E5
Petrol_E6
Hybrid_E4
Hybrid_E5
Hybrid_E6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PM (index.km1)
EuroVI
%ofPassengercarsregisteredsinceSept2014thatareEuroVI
11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MERCEDES
MINI
PORSCHE
BMW
AUDI
VOLKSWAGEN
FORD
VOLVO
HYUNDI
CITROEN
VAUXHALL
SEAT
PEUGEOT
SKODA
KIA
HONDA
JAGUAR
LAND ROVER
MAZDA
NISSAN
TOYOTA
% Euro VI
Diesel
Petrol
EuroVI
NOXHeavyCommercialVehicles,Spring/Summer2015
12
Artic_E2
Artic_E3
Artic_E4
Artic_E5
Artic_E6
Rigid_E2
Rigid_E3
Rigid_E4
Rigid_E5
Rigid_E6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350NO X / CO 2 ratio * 10000
Euro VINOX HCVs � Corroboration TfL data
13
N2rigid0%load
N3rigid0%load
N2rigid100%load
N3rigid100%load
RSDrigid
N3artic0%load
N3artic100%load
zRSDartic
0
20
40
60
80
NO
X/CO
2ratio*10000
https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/In-service%20emissions%20performance%20of%20Euro%206VI%20vehicles%20WEBSITE%20COPY.pdf
Manufacturer comparisonEuro V 2.0-litre diesel cars with EA189 engine
14
#AUDI
#SEAT
#SKODA
#VOLKSWAGEN
OTHERS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0NO
X(grams.km
1)
DIESEL
Euro V Standard
OTHERS:2.0-litre dieselengines from otherMarquese.g.BMWFORDKIATOYOTAVAUXHALL
Manufacturer comparisonEuro VI
15
#AUDI
#VOLKSWAGEN
BMW
MAZDA
MERCEDES
PETROL
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
NO
X(grams.km
1)
Euro VIStandard
EuroV EuroVI#AUDI
#SEAT
#SKODA
#VOLKSWAGEN
OTHERS
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
NO
X(grams.km
1)
DIESEL
Euro V Standard
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Year of registration
NO
X(grams.km
1)
Euro III Euro IV Euro V Euro VI
Emission standard
Manufacturer comparison � Diesel carsNOX emissions by manufacturer & Year of 1
st registration
Euro VI
17
RECOMMENDATIONS
18
Ⴇ RDE regulations
Ⴇ Sooner rather than later i.e. before Jan 2017
Ⴇ Transparency in RDE testing
Ⴇ In-service RDE testing (deterioration emission controls, SCR dosing, DPF removal)
Ⴇ Independent + Open data
? Environmental labelling for CO2 and air quality pollutants ? A marketing incentive ?
Ⴇ Shift inTax landscape to include NOX penalty
Ⴇ Price fuel e.g. Belgium Diesel +10cts per litre 2016-2017
Ⴇ VED
Ⴇ Company car Benefit in Kind (BiK) tax
Ⴇ Car free City centres
Ⴇ Sustainable mobility & Active travel & Green space
Ⴇ Noise
And finally�. improving air quality
Dr James TateInstitute for Transport Studies,
University of Leeds, UK
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: drjamestate