Schwarz Value Surveys Presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is an overview presentation about Schwarz value surveys and brief comparison of it with the value measuring approach suggested by World Values Surveys

Text of Schwarz Value Surveys Presentation

OverviewBy Liubov V. Borisova

December 8, 2009

Overview2

Theories of Values Introduction Theory of Basic Human Values individual levelTheory of Cultural Values cultural level Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) Validation of Theories and Empirical Results Theory of Basic Human Needs Theory of Cultural Values

Critical Assessment and Discussion

Theories of Values (1)3

Theory inspired by the works of Rokeach (1973) and Hofstede (1980, 1982, 1983) the early classics of value research. Schwartz developed a theory of content and structure of values on the basis of empirical cross-cultural studies (Schwartz 1992; Schwartz & Bilsky, 1987, 1990). Methodologically arises from the idea of circumplex structure of personality:Personality or affect variables lie on the circumference of a circle, and the strength of the association between variables decreases as the distance between variables on the circle increases (Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004). Idea of competing and complementary types of values (Schwartz, 1996)

Theories of Values (2)4

Three major questions within the project (Schwartz, 1992):

How are the value priorities of individuals affected by their social experiences? How do the value priorities held by individuals affect their behavioural orientations and choices? How do value priorities from matched groups in various countries differ between each other?

According to Schwartz, integrated values on the individual level (in terms of motivational types of values and their goals) are distinguished from cultural orientations:

While motivational dimensions are found in every culture, the level of importance of each dimension varies from one culture to the next

Concept of Values5

Values are conceptions of the desirable that guide the way social actors (e.g. organizational leaders, policy-makers, individual persons) select actions, evaluate people and events, and explain their actions and evaluations. [Values] are transsituational criteria or goals, ordered by importance as guiding principles of life (Schwartz, 1999).

Theory of Basic Human Values6

The type of motivational goal the values express distinguishes among different values Three universal requirements of human existence (Schwartz, 1996): Biological

needs Coordinated social interaction Demand of group survival and functioning

Schwartz creates 10 motivational types, which are comprised of 57 (45) single values and plots them in the circumplex structure within the two dimensions.

Motivational Types and Individual Values (1)7

Power: motivational goal of power values is the attainment of social status and prestige, and the control or dominance over people and resources.

Social Power, Authority, Wealth Successful, Capable, Ambitious, Influential

Achievement: personal success through demonstrated competence.

Hedonism: pleasure or sensuous gratification for oneself. This value type is derived from physical needs and the pleasure associated with satisfying them.

Pleasure, Enjoying Life Daring, a Varied Life, an Exciting Life

Stimulation: excitement, novelty, and challenge in life.

Self-Direction: independent thought and action (for example, choosing, creating, exploring).

Creativity, Freedom, Independent, Curious, Choosing Own GoalsFrom SVS Official Web-site www.imo-international.de

Motivational Types and Individual Values (2)8

Universalism: understanding, appreciation, tolerance, and protection of the welfare for all people and for nature.

Broadminded, Wisdom, Social Justice, Equality, a World at Peace, a World of Beauty, Unity with Nature, Protecting the Environment

Benevolence: preserving and enhancing the welfare of people with whom one is in frequent personal contact.

Helpful, Honest, Forgiving, Loyal, Responsible

Tradition: respect, commitment, and acceptance of the customs and ideas that one's culture or religion imposes on the individual.

Humble, Accepting my Portion of Life, Devout, Respect for Tradition, Moderate

Conformity: restraint of actions, inclinations, and impulses likely to upset or harm others and violate social expectations or norms.

Politeness, Obedient, Self-Discipline, Honoring Parents and Elders Family Security, National Security, Social Order, Clean, Reciprocation of Favours

Security: safety, harmony, and stability of society, relationships, and of self.

Originally there was 11th type Spirituality, but it was not found to be universalFrom SVS Official Web-site www.imo-international.de

Motivational Types and Individual Values (3)9

All the 10 motivational types/integrated values can be summarised in terms of the two-dimensional structure (this is empirically driven):

Openness to change vs. Conservation (conflict between emphasis on own independent thought and action, and favouring change vs. selfrestriction, preservation of traditional practices, protection of stability).Self-Transcendence vs. Self-Enhacement (conflict of acceptance of others as equals and concern for their welfare vs. pursuit of own relative success and dominance over others)

Theorised Structure of the Individual-Level Motivational Types10

Schwartz & Rubel, 2005: 1011

Theory of Cultural Values (1)11

Cultural values implicitly or explicitly shared abstract ideas about what is good, right, and desirable in a society (Schwartz, 1999) According to Schwartz, the way the societal institutions function and their goals express cultural value priorities. Individual value priorities are a product of a)shared culture and b)personal experiences. Individuals learn to accept shared social values through adaptation to social reality, formal and informal socialisation. Thus, Schwartz infers societal value priorities by aggregating the value priorities of individuals.

Theory of Cultural Values (2)12

Three major issues which confront all societies, on which cultural values can be compared: Relationship Responsible Hierarchy

between individual and group:vs. (Intellectual and Affective) Autonomy

Conservatism

behaviour to preserve social fabric:

vs. Egalitarianism

The

relation to the natural and social worldvs. Harmony

Mastery

The seven value types form three bipolar dimensions

Theorised Structure of the Culture-Level Value Types13

Schwartz, 1999: 29

Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) (1)14

Established 1987 by Schwartz and Bilsky 1988-1992: survey administered within 41 cultural groups in 38 nations 38 samples of school teachers, 38 of university students

Reasoning: school teachers may have a number of advantages for characterizing cultural priorities. they play an explicit role in value socialization, they are presumably key carriers of culture and they probably reflect the mid-range of prevailing value priorities in most societies (Schwartz, 1999:34) . To argue for his point, Schwartz compares the order of different nations from the teacher samples with student samples and finds many similarities.

By now: more than 60,000 individuals in 64 nations on all continents

Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) (2)15

Structure:

2 sets of single items/values (56 or 57 total)

21 values identical to those proposed by Rokeach (1973) Terminal vs. instrumental values (Schwartz, 1992)

Terminal end states, expressed in nouns: equality Instrumental modes of behaviour, phrased as adjectives: independent Some divergence of responses to terminal and instrumental values But also Schwartz and Bilsky discuss the possibility of the order of values influencing the answers

Each item followed in parentheses by a short explanatory phrase. E.g. EQUALITY (equal opportunities for all) Respondents need to rate each item as a guiding principle in their life on a 9-point scale: from 7 (of supreme importance) through 0 (not important) to -1 (opposed to my principles)

Demographic questionnaire

Address: www.imo-international.de

Motivational Types and Individual Items16

Miao et al., 2009:671

Validation of Theory Individual Level17

Validation of Theory of Basic Human Values through empirical analysis Smallest

Space Analysis (Schwartz, 1992) OR Similarity Structure Analysis (Schwartz, 1999) both SSA Intercorrelation

matrix of Pearson correlations between the importance of ratings within samples Computed on the multidimensional space through MDS (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) the closer the points are, the more similar they are (separate samples)

Value Structure, averaged18

Schwartz, 1992: 24

Value Structure, teacher sample19

Schwartz, 1992: 34

Value Structure, student sample20

Schwartz, 1992: 33

Example21

Comparison of sportsmen and trainers with teachers. By Dr Nicholas G. Aplin in The Values of Physical Education Trainees in Singapore

Validation of Theory Cultural Level22

Validation of Theory of Cultural Values through empirical analysis (Schwartz, 1999) SSA Means

of each of the single items for each of the 122 samples Correlations between items within sample Covariation in the mean importance ratings across samples determines the culture-level dimensions

Value structure, culture-level23

Schwartz, 1999: 31

Empirical implications24

Comparing culturesAssumption: teachers are a good representation of national value priorities Finding the importance attributed to each dimension through averaging the values which represent each dimension creating a mean for each nation/sample for each dimension

Thus, for example,