Storia Della Storiografia_Peer Review Report

7/30/2019 Storia Della Storiografia_Peer Review Report

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/storia-della-storiografiapeer-review-report 1/3

PEER REVIEW EVALUATION REPORT FOR SUBMISSIONS TO

STORIA DELLA STORIOGRAFIA

v. 3.0 (September 2009)

Storia della Storiografia-History of Historiography-Histoire de l’Histoire de

l’Historiographie-Geschichte der Geschichtsschreibung is a peer reviewed journal

founded in 1982, considered as one of the leading journals in the field of history of

historical writing, methodologies and profession. IT is indexed by Historical Abstracts.

This is to inform you that your name has been put forward by the Editors of Storia della

Storiografia (http://www.storiastoriografia.eu) to act as a referee for the enclosed

article. You are kindly requested to read it carefully and to forward your advice to the

Editors by e-mail within three weeks. Should you have already evaluated elsewhere the

enclosed paper, please let us know and please turn down the present engagement.

Your name will be kept strictly confidential, as much as the author’s name. We are

accordingly removing from the enclosed paper any detail which might lead to identify

the author.

Your comments and suggestions will be forwarded to the article’s Author, pointing out

that they are expert advice from a specialist of the discipline.

Please fill in the following 4 sections form by highlighting the relevant items, writing

any remarks in each corresponding field and adding free comments and suggestions in

the final paragraph. Direct references as detailed as possible to the text of the article are

welcome.

Thank you very much for your cooperation.

*** *** ***

TITLE OF THE REFEREED PAPER :

R EFEREE:

SENT ON: R ETURNED ON:

A. SUBJECT

A.1: Relevance of the subject for the history of historiography:

Weak Satisfying StrongRemarks:

A.2: Relevance of the topic for the specialised sector:

Weak Satisfying Strong

Remarks:

A.3: Innovative contribution of the article (if a research paper), or effectiveness and

helpfulness (in case of introductory or review article):


S TORIA DELLA S TORIOGRAFIA PEER REVIEW REPORT

PAGINA 1 DI 3

http://www.storiastoriografia.eu/

http://www.storiastoriografia.eu/




Remarks:

B. RESEARCH

B.1 Adequacy in outlining the historiographical or methodological issue:

Weak Improvable Adequate StrongRemarks:

B.2: Engagement with the available secondary literature on the topic:

Weak Improvable Adequate Strong

Remarks:

B.3: Originality and appropriateness of the documentary basis, in quantitative terms as

well:


Remarks:

B.4: Use of the documentary basis:


Remarks:

B.5: Originality and qualities of the proposed interpretative results:


Remarks:

C. ARGUMENTATION AND WRITING FORM

C.1: Clarity, consistency and inclusivity of outline and argument:


Remarks:

C.2: How is the writing form adequate for outlining the article’s topic?


Remarks:

C.3: Writing clarity and appropriateness of language


Remarks:

D. OVERALL EVALUATION

Finally, is the text fit for publication in Storia della Storiografia?


PAGINA 2 DI 3





PAGINA 3 DI 3

[1] Yes, it can be published as it stands.

[2] Yes, it can be published without further reviews, but for some limited

corrections, as they are spelt out in the enclosed remarks.

[3] Yes, it can be published, provided the author faces and solves the problems that

I have raised in my remarks, and after my second review.

[4] No, the article does not seem fit for publication on Cromohs.

Free remarks

Your remarks will be forwarded anonymously to the author and, in case of an at least

partially positive evaluation, will help him/her in revising the article. If you believe that

revisions (however heavy) are needed, you are kindly requested to point out any

detected flaw and to suggested the relevant revisions.

Even if you do not believe that the contribution fits the journal standards (answer [4])you are kindly requested to briefly explain the reasons of your evaluation.

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………

Date Signature

Please e-mail your correspondence to:

[email protected] and [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]




Documents

Storia Della Storiografia_Peer Review Report