Upload
dodung
View
217
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Title
Prediction of inter-individual differences in hepatic functions and drug sensitivity by
using human iPS-derived hepatocytes
Authors
Kazuo Takayama, Yuta Morisaki, Shuichi Kuno, Yasuhito Nagamoto, Kazuo Harada,
Norihisa Furukawa, Manami Ohtaka, Ken Nishimura, Kazuo Imagawa, Fuminori
Sakurai, Masashi Tachibana, Ryo Sumazaki, Emiko Noguchi, Mahito Nakanishi,
Kazumasa Hirata, Kenji Kawabata, Hiroyuki Mizuguchi
Supporting Information (SI) Appendix
Contents
SI Appendix Fig. S1
SI Appendix Fig. S2
SI Appendix Fig. S3
SI Appendix Fig. S4
SI Appendix Fig. S5
SI Appendix Fig. S6
SI Appendix Fig. S7
SI Appendix Fig. S8
SI Appendix Table S1
SI Appendix Table S2
SI Appendix Table S3
SI Appendix Experimental Procedures
SI Appendix References
2
SI Appendix, Figures
Figure S1. Generation of Human iPSCs From PHHs. PHHs were Infected With
SeVdp-iPS Vectors. (A) The genome structure of a SeVdp-iPS vector is shown. The
SeV vector used in this study is designed to become extinct after iPSC generation since
it encodes a miR302a (strongly expressed in human iPSCs)-target sequence. (B) The
procedure for generation of human iPSCs from PHHs is presented schematically. A
phase-contrast micrograph of the PHHs, which were cultured for 48 hr, is shown (left).
Alkaline phosphatase staining was performed in PHH-iPSCs on day 23 (right). (C) The
gene expression levels of pluripotent markers (OCT3/4, SOX2, and NANOG) and
hepatic markers (ALB, CYP3A4, and αAT) were examined in PHHs, PHH-iPSCs, and
human ESCs (H9). On the y axis, the gene expression levels of pluripotent markers or
hepatic markers in human ESCs or PHHs, respectively, were taken as 1.0. Data
represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance
Sendai virus construction SeVdp-iPS vector (genome ; (-) ssRNA)A
KLF4 L
CN
P/V3’ 5’OCT3/4 SOX2 c-MYC
miR-302a
target
B
day0 1 2
SeVdp-iPS
vector
infection (5 MOI)
3
ALP stainingswitch to
iPSC medium
plate
PHHs
plate MEF
onto PHHs
17 - 23
virus Infection
HCM-iPS
iPSC generation
MEF
ReproStem
bFGF (10 ng/ml) + 3 compounds
20 mm 50 mm
C
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
PHHs PHH-iPSCs
101
100
10-1
10-2
10-3
10-4
rela
tive g
en
e e
xp
ressio
n
a
b b
a
b b
a
b b
hESCs
101
100
10-1
10-2
10-3
10-4
10-5
rela
tive
ge
ne
ex
pre
ss
ion
a
b b
a
b b
a
b b
3
was evaluated by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc tests to compare all groups
(PHHs, PHH-iPSCs, and hESCs). Groups that do not share the same letter are
significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
4
Figure S2. PHH-iPSCs Could Differentiate into Three Germ Layer Cells and
Originated From PHHs. (A) The embryoid body (EB) structures were generated from
the PHH-iPSCs. A phase contrast image of a PHH-iPS-derived EB is shown. At 2 weeks
from EB formation, the gene expression levels of pluripotent markers (OCT3/4 and
NANOG), definitive endoderm genes (FOXA2 and SOX17), mesoderm genes (T and
TnTc), and ectoderm genes (MAP2 and PAX6) in the undifferentiated human ESCs (H9,
hESCs-day0), human ESC-derived EB (hESCs-EB), undifferentiated PHH-iPSCs
(PHH-iPS-day0), and PHH-iPSC-derived EB (PHH-iPS-EB) were examined by
A
20 mm
rela
tiv
e g
en
e e
xp
ressio
n pluripotent genes definitive endoderm genes mesoderm genes ectoderm genes
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
OCT3/4 NANOG
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
FOXA2 SOX17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
T TnTc
0
20
40
60
80
MAP2 PAX6
hESCs-day0 hESCs-EB PHH-iPS-day0 PHH-iPS-EB
muscle neural tissue
B
** * *
* ** * *
*
**
* *
*
*
gut-like
epithelium cartilage adipose issue
C
TH01 D21S11
D5S818 D13S317 D7S820 D16S539 CSF1PO
AMEL vWA TPOX
TH01 D21S11
D5S818 D13S317 D7S820 D16S539 CSF1PO
AMEL vWA TPOX
PH
Hs (
do
no
r1)
PH
H-i
PS
Cs (
do
no
r1)
5
real-time RT-PCR. Data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.
Student’s t test indicated that the gene expression levels in “EB” were significantly
different from those in “day 0” (P<0.01). (B) To perform the teratoma assay, the
PHH-iPSCs (1×106 cells/NOG mouse) were subcutaneously transplanted. At 6 weeks
from the transplantation, the tumors were harvested, and hematoxylin and eosin staining
was performed. (C) STR analysis was performed in PHH and PHH-iPSC-derived
hepatocyte-like cells (PHH-iPS-HLCs).
6
Figure S3. Comparison of the Hepatic Functions Among Early- or Late-Passage
PHH-iPS-HLCs, PBMC#1-iPS-HLCs, HDF-iPS-HLCs, and HUVEC-iPS-HLCs. (A, B)
PHH-iPS (P10 or P40), PBMC-iPS (P30), HDF-iPS (P40), and HUVEC-iPS (P35) were
differentiated into the hepatocyte-like cells as shown in Fig. 2F. The TAT expression (A)
and ALB secretion levels (B) in the PHH-iPS-HLCs (P10 or P40), PBMC#1-iPS-HLCs
(P30), HDF-iPS-HLCs (P40), and HUVEC-iPS-HLCs (P35) were examined. On the y
axis, the gene expression level of TAT in PHHs was taken as 1.0 in SI Appendix, Fig.
S3A. Data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical
significance was evaluated by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc tests to
compare all five groups. Groups that do not share the same letter are significantly
different from each other (P<0.05). The TAT expression and ALB secretion levels in the
PHH-iPS-HLCs (P40) were similar to those in PBMC#1-iPS-HLCs (P30),
HDF-iPS-HLCs (P40), and HUVEC-iPS-HLCs (P35). Note that PHH-iPS-HLCs and
the other HLCs do not share the same genetic background.
A
B
AL
B s
ec
reti
on
(mg
/ml/
24
hr/
mg
pro
tein
)
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
0
10
20
30
a
b
b
b b b
b b b
a
0
0.25
0.50
0.75re
lati
ve
TA
T e
xp
res
sio
n
7
Figure S4. Highly Efficient Hepatocyte Differentiation From Human
Non-PHH-Derived iPSCs or ESCs Independent of Their Differentiation Tendency. (A,
B) PHH-iPS, PBMC#1-iPS, HDF-iPS, and human ES (KhES1) cells were differentiated
into the HLCs via the HBCs as described in Fig. 2A. On day 25 of differentiation, the
efficiency of hepatocyte differentiation was measured by estimating the percentage of
ASGR1- or ALB-positive cells using FACS analysis (A). The amount of ALB or urea
secretion was examined (B). (C, D) PHH-iPSCs were differentiated into the hepatic
lineage, and then PHH-iPS-HBCs were purified and maintained for 3 passages on
human LN111. Thereafter, expanded HBCs were differentiated into the HLCs as
described in Fig. 2F. The efficiency of hepatic differentiation from HBCs was measured
by estimating the percentage of ASGR1- or ALB-positive cells using FACS analysis (C).
The amount of ALB or urea secretion was examined (D). Data represent the mean ± SD.
These results indicated that the hepatic differentiation efficiency of these four lines
could be rendered uniform by performing hepatic maturation after the establishment of
self-renewing HBCs.
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
10
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
10
100
A
C
B
D
% o
f an
tig
en
-po
sit
ive c
ells
AL
B o
r u
rea s
ec
reti
on
le
ve
l
% o
f an
tig
en
-po
sit
ive c
ells
AL
B o
r u
rea s
ecre
tio
n level
ASGR1 ALB
ALB
UREA
(mg/ml/24hr/mg protein)
(mg/dl/24hr/mg protein)
ASGR1 ALB
ALB
UREA
(mg/ml/24hr/mg protein)
(mg/dl/24hr/mg protein)
101
100
102
101
100
102
8
Figure S5. Ratio of the CYP Activities in the PHH-iPS-HLCs to those in PHHs, and
Summary of the CYP2D6 Polymorphism Genotyping. (A) The ratios of the CYP1A2,
2C9, and 3A4 activity levels in the PHH-iPS-HLCs to those in the PHHs were
examined. (B) The CYP activity levels in the parent PHHs might be predicted from
those in the PHH-iPS-HLCs by using the formula shown here. “X” represents the CYP
activity levels in the PHH-iPS-HLCs. The predicted CYP activity levels in the parent
PHHs are shown here.
A B
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
CYP1A2 CYP2C9 CYP3A4
rati
o o
f C
YP
ac
tivit
y l
eve
l
(PH
H-i
PS
-HL
Cs
to
PH
Hs
)CYP1A2 CYP2C9 CYP3A4
predicted maximum X*0.87 Y*0.98 Z*0.88
predicted first quartile X*0.67 Y*0.71 Z*0.62
predicted median X*0.59 Y*0.6 Z*0.57
predicted third quartile X*0.45 Y*0.56 Z*0.43
predicted minimum X*0.38 Y*0.35 Z*0.23
9
Figure S6. Comparison of the CYP3A4 Activity Levels Among PHH-iPS-HLCs,
non-PHH-iPS-HLCs, and hES-HLCs. (A) Non-PHH-derived iPS cells (PBMC#1-iPS,
PBMC#2-iPS, HDF-iPS, MRC5-iPS, HUVEC#1-iPS, and HUVEC#2-iPS cells) and
human ES cells (H1, H9, KhES1-4) were differentiated into the hepatocyte-like cells
according to Fig. 2F, and then the CYP3A4 activity levels were measured by
LC-MS/MS analysis. (B) The CYP3A4 activity levels in PHH-iPS-HLCs (12 donor
average), non-PHH-iPS-HLCs (6 donor average), and hES-HLCs (6 donor average)
were shown in the graph. The average and variance of CYP3A4 activity levels were
both similar among these three groups.
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
15
30
45
60
75
PHH-iPS-HLCs (12donors)
non-PHH-iPS-HLCs (6donors)
hES-HLCs (6 donors)
A
B
ac
tivit
y l
eve
l
CYP3A4a
cti
vit
y l
eve
l
CYP3A4
Non-PHH-iPS-HLCs
(6 donors)
hES-HLCs
(6 donors)
10
Figure S7. CYP Induction Capacity and Gene Expression Levels of Transporters in
PHHs and PHH-iPS-HLCs. (A-C) To examine CYP1A2 (A), 2B6 (B), and 3A4 (C)
induction potency, the cells were treated with 50 μM omeprazole for 24 hr, 500 μM
phenobarbital for 48 hr, or 20 μM rifampicin for 48 hr; these agents are known to induce
CYP1A2, 2B6, and 3A4, respectively. The gene expression levels of CYPs were
measured by real-time RT-PCR. Controls were treated with DMSO (final concentration
0.1%). The R-squared values are indicated in each figure. (D, E) The gene expression
profile of CYPs (D) and transporters (E) is shown.
1
10
100
1000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112
1
10
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112
1
10
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112
R² = 0.7491
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 10 20
R² = 0.6164
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20
R² = 0.6353
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10
A
C
B
E
101
100
102
103
donor number
donor number
donor number
101
100
102
101
100
102
fold
in
du
cti
on
fold
in
du
cti
on
fold
in
du
cti
on
fold
in
du
cti
on
of
PH
Hs
fold induction of HLCs
fold induction of HLCs
fold induction of HLCs
fold
in
du
cti
on
of
PH
Hs
fold
in
du
cti
on
of
PH
Hs
CYP1A2
CYP2B6
CYP3A4
10+ 1.910- 1.8
D
10+ 2.210- 2.2
11
Figure S8. Tamoxifen-Induced Breast Cancer Cell (T-47D) Toxicity and
Perhexiline-Induced Hepatotoxicity were Examined. (A) The pharmacological activity
of tamoxifen-dependent conversion to its metabolite, endoxifen, by the CYP2D6. The
co-culture system of breast cancer cells (T-47D cells) and the PHH-iPS-HLCs is
illustrated. (B) The cell viability of T-47D cells was assessed after 72 hr exposure to
A B
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
25
50
75
100
125
0
25
50
75
100
tamoxifen
active form of
tamoxifen, endoxifen
CYP2D6
breast cancer cells, T-47D
PHH-iPS-HLCs or PHHs
perhexilin
CYP2D6
hydroxy-metabolites of drug
hepatotoxic
E
non-hepatotoxic
F
PHH-WT
PHH-NUL
HLC-WT
HLC-NUL
cell v
iab
ilit
ycell v
iab
ilit
y
concentration of tamoxifen
0 50 500 5,000 (nM)
concentration of perhexilin
0 0.5 5 50 (mM)
G
cell v
iab
ilit
y
control quinidine
*
control quinidine
cell v
iab
ilit
y
*
*
*
C D
NO
NE
Ad
-LacZ
Ad
-CY
P2D
6
HL
C-W
T
NO
NE
Ad
-La
cZ
Ad
-CY
P2D
6
PH
H-W
T
PHH-NUL HLC-NUL
PH
H-W
T
PH
H-N
UL
HL
C-W
T
HL
C-N
UL
PH
H-W
T
PH
H-N
UL
HL
C-W
T
HL
C-N
UL
NO
NE
Ad
-La
cZ
Ad
-CY
P2D
6
HL
C-W
T
NO
NE
Ad
-La
cZ
Ad
-CY
P2D
6
PH
H-W
T
PHH-NUL HLC-NUL
cell v
iab
ilit
ycell v
iab
ilit
y
Hd d
aa
b bc c
aa
aa
b b
c c
12
different concentrations of tamoxifen. (C) The cell viability of T-47D cells, which were
co-cultured with PHH-WT, PHH-NUL, HLC-WT, and HLC-NUL, was assessed after
72 hr exposure to 500 nM of tamoxifen in the presence or absence of 3 nM quinidine (a
CYP2D6 inhibitor). (D) The cell viability of T-47D cells, which were co-cultured with
Ad-CYP2D6-transduced PHH-NUL and HLC-NUL, was examined after 72 hr exposure
to 500 nM of tamoxifen. (E) The detoxification of perhexiline-dependent conversion to
its conjugated form by the CYP2D6. (F) The cell viabilities of PHH-WT, PHH-NUL,
HLC-WT, and HLC-NUL were assessed after 24 hr exposure to different concentrations
of perhexiline. (G) The cell viabilities of the PHH-WT and HLC-WT were assessed
after 24 hr exposure to 5 μM of perhexiline in the presence or absence of 5 μM
quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor). (H) The cell viabilities of the Ad-CYP2D6-transduced
PHH-NUL and HLC-NUL were examined after 24 hr exposure to 5 μM of perhexiline.
The cell viabilities are expressed as a percentage of that in the cells treated with only
solvent. Data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. In SI
Appendix, Fig. S8C and S8G, student’s t test indicated that the cell viability in “control”
were significantly higher than that in “quinidine” (P<0.01). In SI Appendix, Fig. S8D
and S8H, statistical significance was evaluated by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni
post-hoc tests to compare all groups. Groups that do not share the same letter are
significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
13
SI Appendix, Tables
Table S1. The Primary Antibodies Used in This Study
antigen type company
AFP (IHC) rabbit DAKO
AFP (FACS) mouse Cell Signaling
ALB mouse Abcam
CYP2D6 mouse BD Biosciences
ASGR1 goat Santa Cruz Biotechnology
αAT chicken Abcam
NANOG mouse Santa Cruz Biotechnology
OCT3/4 mouse Santa Cruz Biotechnology
SSEA4 mouse Abcam
SOX2 goat Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Tra1-81 mouse Santa Cruz Biotechnology
KLF4 rabbit Santa Cruz Biotechnology
EpCAM mouse Milltenyi Biotech
CD133 mouse Milltenyi Biotech
b-actin mouse Sigma
control IgG rabbit Santa Cruz Biotechnology
control IgG mouse Santa Cruz Biotechnology
control IgG goat Santa Cruz Biotechnology
14
Table S2. The Secondary Antibodies Used in This Study
antigen fluorescent dye company
rabbit IgG alexa fluor 594 Molecular Probes
rabbit IgG alexa fluor 488 Molecular Probes
mouse IgG alexa fluor 594 Molecular Probes
mouse IgG alexa fluor 488 Molecular Probes
goat IgG alexa fluor 594 Molecular Probes
goat IgG alexa fluor 488 Molecular Probes
chicken IgG alexa fluor 488 Molecular Probes
15
Table S3. The Summary of CYP2D6 Polymorphisms (CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8,
*16, and *21) Genotyping is Shown.
sample
CYP2D6 SNPs
*3, *4, *6, *7,
*8 *5 *16 *21
PHH1 *4/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH2 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH3 *4/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH4 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH5 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH6 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH6 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH8 *4/*4 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH9 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH10 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH11 *4/*4 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
PHH12 wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt wt/wt
16
SI Appendix, Experimental Procedures
Human ESCs/iPSCs Culture
The human ESC lines, H1, H9 (WiCell Research Institute), and KhES1-4
(provided by Dr. N. Nakatsuji, Kyoto University), were maintained on a feeder layer of
mitomycin C-treated EmbryoMax Primary Mouse Embryo Fibroblasts (MEF, Merck
Millipore) with ReproStem medium (ReproCELL) supplemented with 5 ng/ml
fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2, KATAYAMA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES). Human
ESCs were used following the Guidelines for Derivation and Utilization of Human
Embryonic Stem Cells of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology of Japan and furthermore, and the study was approved by the Independent
Ethics Committee. The human iPSC line, Tic (provided by Dr. A. Umezawa, National
Center for Child Health and Development), PBMC#1-iPSCs, PBMC#2-iPSCs,
and PHH-iPSCs were maintained on a feeder layer of mitomycin C-treated MEF with
ReproStem medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml FGF2. Human iPSC lines generated
from Human Dermal Fibroblasts (HDFs, HDF-iPS) and Human Umbilical Vein
Endothelial Cells (HUVECs, HUVEC#1-iPS and HUVEC#2-iPS) were maintained on a
feeder layer of mitomycin C-treated MEF with ReproStem medium supplemented with
5 ng/ml FGF2.
In Vitro Hepatocyte Differentiation
For each human iPSC line used in hepatocyte differentiation, all differentiated
cells were constantly removed by manual collection with a pipette. Before the initiation
of hepatocyte differentiation, human iPSCs were dissociated into clumps by using
dispase (Roche) and plated onto BD Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix Growth
Factor Reduced (BD Biosciences). These cells were cultured in the MEF-conditioned
medium for 3-4 days. The differentiation protocol for the induction of definitive
endoderm cells, hepatoblasts, and hepatocytes was based on our previous reports with
some modifications (1-4). Briefly, in the definitive endoderm differentiation, human
iPSCs were cultured for 4 days in L-Wnt3A-expressing cell (ATCC,
CRL2647)-conditioned RPMI1640 medium (Sigma) which contains 100 ng/ml Activin
A (R&D Systems), 4 mM L-Glutamine, 0.2% FBS (PAA Laboratories), and 1×B27
Supplement Minus Vitamin A (Life Technologies). For the induction of HBCs, the
definitive endoderm cells were cultured for 5 days in RPMI1640 medium (Sigma)
17
which contains 30 ng/ml bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) (R&D Systems) and 20
ng/ml FGF4 (R&D Systems), 4 mM L-Glutamine, and 1×B27 Supplement Minus
Vitamin A. The protocol for HBC proliferation using human recombinant laminin-111
(BioLamina) was based on our previous report with some modifications (3). Briefly, the
hPSC-derived HBCs were first purified from the hPSC-derived cells (day 9) by
selecting attached cells on a human recombinant LN111-coated dish (the final coating
concentration was 1.0 μg/cm2) at 15 min after plating. The hPSC-derived HBCs were
cultured on a human LN111-coated dish (2.5 × 104 cells/cm
2) in maintenance
DMEM/F12 medium (DMEM/F12 medium (Invitrogen) was supplemented with 10%
FBS (PAA laboratories), 1×insulin/transferrin/selenium, 10 mM nicotinamide, 10-7
M
Dexamethasone (DEX) (Sigma), 20 mM HEPES, 25 mM NaHCO3, 1×GlutaMAX, 40
ng/ml hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (R&D Systems) and 20 ng/ml epidermal growth
factors (EGF) (R&D Systems)). The medium was refreshed every day. The HBCs were
dissociated with Accutase (Millipore) into single cells, and subcultured every 6 or 7
days. To perform the hepatocyte differentiation, the HBCs were cultured for 5 days in
RPMI1640 medium (Sigma) which contains 20 ng/ml HGF, 4 mM L-Glutamine, and
1×B27 Supplement Minus Vitamin A. And then, the cells were cultured for 11 days in
Hepatocyte Culture Medium (HCM, Lonza) without EGF but with 20 ng/ml oncostatin
M (OsM). Unlike the method used in our previous reports (1-6), the current
differentiation method could omit the use of adenovirus-mediated overexpression of
hepatic transcription factors.
CYP Induction
Total RNA was isolated from human iPSCs and their derivatives using an RNeasy
Mini Kit (Qiagen). To measure CYP1A2, 2B6, and 3A4 induction potencies, the gene
expression levels of CYPs were measured by real-time RT-PCR. Real-time RT-PCR
was performed with TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems). The
assay IDs for CYP1A2, 2B6, and 3A4 are Hs00167927_m1, Hs04183483_g1, and
Hs00430021_m1 (all from Applied Biosystems), respectively. The cells were treated
with 50 μM omeprazole for 24 hr, 500 μM phenobarbital for 48 hr, or 20 μM rifampicin
for 48 hr (all from Wako); these agents are known to induce CYP1A2, 2B6, and 3A4,
respectively. Controls were treated with DMSO (final concentration 0.1%, Wako).
Inducer compounds were replaced daily. Relative quantification was performed against
a standard curve and the values were normalized against the input determined for the
housekeeping gene, GAPDH and beta-actin (ACTB). The assay IDs for GAPDH and
18
ACTB are Hs02758991_g1 and Hs01060665_g1 (all from Applied Biosystems),
respectively.
UPLC-MS/MS Analyses
All human iPSCs, human iPS-HLCs, and PHHs were cultured with medium
containing 10 μM phenacetin (PHE, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories), 10 μM
diclofenac (DIC, Wako), 1 μM bufuralol (BF, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or 100 μM
testosterone (TS, Wako). The metabolites of each substrate are acetaminophen (APAP),
4'-hydroxy diclofenac (OHDIC), 1'-hydroxybufuralol (OHBF), and
6β-hydroxytestosterone (OHTS). After the treatment with substrates, the supernatant
was collected at 2 hr, and then immediately mixed with two volumes of acetonitrile
(Wako). Samples were filtrated with AcroPrep Advance 96-Well Filter Plates (Pall
Corporation) for 5 min at 1,750 g, and then the supernatant was analyzed by
UPLC-MS/MS to measure the concentration of metabolite according to each standard
curve. UPLC analysis was performed using an Acquity UPLC (Waters) and MS/MS was
performed on a Q-Premier XE (Waters). The mass spectrometer was set to the
multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode and was operated with the electrospray
ionization source in positive ion mode. MRM transitions (m/z of precursor ion / m/z of
product ion) for APAP, OHDIC, OHBF, and OHTS were 152.0/110, 312.2/166.8,
278.4/186.1, and 305.4/287.5, respectively. For each transition, the cone voltage and
collision energy were set at 28 V, 28 eV (APAP), 24 V, 60 eV (OHDIC), 26 V, 18 eV
(OHBF), and 38 V, 14 eV (OHTS). The dwell time for each MRM transition was set
at 100 milliseconds. LC separations were carried out at 40oC with an Acquity UPLC
BEH C18 column, 1.7 μm, 2.1 X 50 mm (Waters). The mobile phase was delivered at a
flow rate of 0.5 ml/min using a gradient elution profile consisting of solvent A (0.02%
formic acid/distilled water) and solvent B (0.02% formic acid/acetonitrile). The initial
composition of the binary solvent was 10% B from 0 to 0.5 min. Solvent B was
increased from 10 to 100% over 2.0 min. The composition of solvent remained for 1.0
min at 100% B. 10 μl of sample solution was injected into the column. The
concentrations of each metabolite were calculated according to each standard followed
by normalization to the protein content per well.
Generation of Human iPSCs from PHHs
To generate human iPSCs from PHHs, Sendai virus (SeV) vectors carrying
19
OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC (SeVdp-iPS vector) were used. SeV vectors were
produced as described previously (7). At 24 hr from the PHHs plating (6.12×104
cells/cm2), PHHs were infected with the SeVdp-iPS vector at 5 multiplicity of infection
(MOI) and incubated with HCM-iPS (HCM-iPS consists of HCM and the rock inhibitor
(Y27632 (10 μM, Millipore) or Thiazovivin (0.5μM, Santa Cruz Biotechnology))).
Three hours after the infection, the medium was replaced with fresh HCM-iPS. The next
day, mitomycin C-treated MEF were plated onto SeV-infected PHHs at a density of
1×104 cells/cm
2 with HCM-iPS, and then cultured for 24 hr. The PHHs were cultured
with ReproStem-iPS (ReproStem-iPS consists of ReproStem medium, 10 ng/ml FGF2,
ALK inhibitor SB431542 (2 μM, Wako), MEK inhibitor PD0325901 (0.5 μM, Wako),
and rock inhibitor (Y27632 (10 μM) or Thiazovivin (0.5μM)) for 2-3 weeks. There was
no difference between Y27632- and Thiazovivin-treated cells in terms of
reprogramming efficiency. The reprogramming efficiency of the primary human
hepatocytes (PHH) was approximately 0.005%. Note that no iPS colonies could be
obtained from PHHs without using SB431542, PB0325901, and rock inhibitor. Then,
the human iPS colonies were manually picked up using a pipette and plated onto MEF
and cultured with ReproStem medium containing 10 ng/ml FGF2 in the absence of
SB431542, PD0325901, and rock inhibitor.
Generation of Human iPSCs from HDFs, HUVECs, and PBMCs
To generate human iPSCs from HDFs and HUVECs (donor #1 and #2),
SeVdp-iPS vectors were used. The HDFs (Cell Applications) were cultured with
DMEM (Sigma) containing 10% FBS (GIBCO), penicillin/streptomycin. The HUVECs
(Lonza) were cultured with EGM-2 (Lonza). At 24 hr after the plating of HDFs or
HUVECs (1.25×104 cells/cm
2), HDFs or HUVECs were infected with the SeVdp-iPS
vector at 5 MOI. Three hours after the infection, the medium was replaced with fresh
DMEM or EGM-2. The next day, SeV-infected HDFs or HUVECs were plated onto
MEF. The HDFs or HUVECs were cultured with ReproStem medium containing 5
ng/ml FGF2 for 2-3 weeks. The three compounds (SB431542, PB0325901, and rock
inhibitor), which were used for generation of PHH-iPS cells, were not required to
generate human iPSCs from HDFs, HUVECs, and PBMCs.
To generate human iPSCs from PBMCs (donor #1 and #2), Yamanaka
factor-expressing SeV vectors (CytoTune-iPS For Blood Cells; DNAVEC) were used.
The PBMCs were cultured with X-VIVO 10 Chemically Defined, Serum-free
Hematopoietic Cell Medium (Lonza). At 24 hr after the plating of PBMCs (1.87×105
20
cells/cm2), PBMCs were infected with the SeV vector at 20 MOI. Twenty-four hours
after the infection, the medium was replaced with fresh X-VIVO 10 Chemically
Defined, Serum-free Hematopoietic Cell Medium. The next day, SeV-infected PBMCs
were plated onto MEF. The PBMCs were cultured with ReproStem medium
containing 5 ng/ml FGF2 for 2-3 weeks.
Benzbromarone-Induced Hepatotoxicity
Cell viability was assessed by using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (DOJINDO
LABORATORIES) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In Fig. 3E, the cell
viabilities of PHH5/6/9, PHH1/2/12, PHH5/6/9-iPS-HLC, or PHH1/2/12-iPS-HLC were
measured after 24 hr exposure to the different concentrations of benzbromarone (Wako).
The control refers to incubations in the absence of test compounds and was considered
as 100% viability value. Controls were treated with DMSO (final concentration 0.1%).
In Fig. 3F, the percentage of cells with energized mitochondria in PHH5/6/9,
PHH1/2/12, PHH5/6/9-iPS-HLC, or PHH1/2/12-iPS-HLC was examined after 24 hr
exposure to benzbromarone (25 μM) by FACS analysis. The mitochondrial membrane
potential was assessed by using a Mito-ID Membrane potential cytotoxicity kit (Enzo
Life Sciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In energized cells, the
Mito-ID Membrane Potential dye exists as a green-fluorescent monomer in the cytosol,
and also accumulates as orange-fluorescent aggregates in the mitochondria. However, in
apoptotic and necrotic cells, this dye exits mitochondria and exists primarily as
green-fluorescent monomers in the cytosol. The “PHH5/6/9” represents for average
value of cell viability or mitochondrial membrane potential in PHH5, PHH6, and PHH9.
The “PHH1/2/12” represents for average value of cell viability or mitochondrial
membrane potential in PHH1, PHH2, and PHH12. PHH5, PHH6, and PHH9 are top
three for their CYP2C9 activity levels, while PHH1, PHH2, and PHH12 are bottom
three for their CYP2C9 activity levels.
Tamoxifen-Induced Toxicity in the Breast Cancer Cells
The breast cancer cells, MCF7 cells, were cultured with Minimum Essential
Media (MEM, Invitrogen) containing 10% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1 mM MEM
Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (NEAA, Invitrogen), 1 mM sodium pyruvate
(Invitrogen), and 10 μM human insulin (Sigma). The other breast cancer cells, T-47D,
were cultured with the RPMI1640 medium (Sigma) containing 10% FBS,
21
penicillin/streptomycin, and 10 μM human insulin. The hepatocytes (PHHs or
PHH-iPS-HLCs) and breast cancer cells were co-cultured by using a Millicell Cell
Culture Insert & Plates (Millipore) in the presence of various concentrations of
tamoxifen (Sigma). The breast cancer cells were cultured on the plate, while the
hepatocytes were cultured on the insert. After 72 hr in co-culture, the insert was
removed, and then the cell viability of MCF7 and T-47D cells was measured by using a
Cell Counting Kit- 8 (Figs. 4D and SI Appendix, Fig. S8, respectively). The control
refers to incubations in the absence of test compounds and was considered as 100%
viability value. Controls were treated with DMSO (final concentration 0.1%). In the
CYP2D6 inhibition assays, the hepatocytes and breast cancer cells were co-cultured
with the medium containing 500 nM tamoxifen in the presence or absent of 3 μM
quinidine (Sigma) (Figs. 4E and SI Appendix, Fig. S8). In the CYP2D6 overexpression
experiments, the PHH-NUL and HLC-NUL were transduced with 75 vector particles
(VPs)/cell and 125 VPs/cell, respectively, of Ad-LacZ or Ad-CYP2D6 for 90 min and
cultured for 48 hr. Thereafter, the hepatocytes and breast cancer cells were co-cultured
with the medium containing 500 nM tamoxifen (Figs. 4F and SI Appendix, Fig. S8).
Desipramine- and Perhexiline-Induced Hepatotoxicity
Cell viability was assessed by using a Cell Counting Kit-8 according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. In Figs. 4J or SI Appendix, Fig. S8, the cell viabilities of
the PHH-WT, PHH-NUL, HLC-WT, or HLC-NUL were measured after 24 hr exposure
to different concentrations of desipramine or perhexiline (both from Sigma). The control
refers to incubations in the absence of test compounds and was considered as 100%
viability value. Controls were treated with DMSO (final concentration 0.1%). In the
CYP2D6 inhibition assays, the PHH-WT, PHH-NUL, HLC-WT, or HLC-NUL were
cultured with medium containing 5 μM desipramine or perhexiline in the presence or
absence of 3 μM quinidine (Sigma) (Figs. 4K and SI Appendix, Fig. S8, respectively).
In the CYP2D6 overexpression experiments, the PHH-NUL and HLC-NUL were
transduced with 75 VPs/cells and 125 VPs/cell, respectively, of Ad-LacZ or
Ad-CYP2D6 for 90 min, and cultured for 48 hr. Thereafter, the hepatocytes were
cultured with medium containing 5 μM desipramine or perhexiline (Figs. 4L and SI
Appendix, Fig. S8, respectively).
Ad Vectors
22
Ad vectors were constructed by an improved in vitro ligation method (8, 9). The
human CYP2D6 gene (accession number NM_000106.5) was amplified by PCR using
primers: CYP2D6 Fwd 5’- gtTCTAGAggtatggggctagaagcactg-3’ and CYP2D6 Rev 5’-
gtGCGGCCGCctagcggggcacagcac -3’. The human CYP2D6 gene was inserted into
pHMEF5 (10), which contains the human elongation factor-1α (EF-1α) promoter,
resulting in pHMEF-CYP2D6. The pHMEF-CYP2D6 was digested with I-CeuI/PI-SceI
and ligated into I-CeuI/PI-SceI-digested pAdHM41-K7, resulting in pAd-CYP2D6. The
human EF-1α promoter-driven LacZ-expressing Ad vectors (Ad-LacZ) were
constructed previously (11). All of Ad vectors contain a stretch of lysine residue (K7)
peptides in the C-terminal region of the fiber knob for more efficient transduction of
human iPSCs and its derivatives, in which transfection efficiency was almost 100%, and
purified as described previously (1, 5, 12). The VP titer was determined by using a
spectrophotometric method (13).
RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from human ESCs/iPSCs and their derivatives using
ISOGENE (NIPPON GENE). cDNA was synthesized using 500 ng of total RNA with a
Superscript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Real-time RT-PCR was performed
with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using a StepOnePlus
real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Relative quantification was performed
against a standard curve and the values were normalized against the input determined
for the housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). PCR
primers sequences were obtained from qPrimerDepot (http://primerdepot.nci.nih.gov/).
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Staining and Immunohistochemistry
ALP staining was performed using an ALP detection kit (Chemicon) according to
the manufacturer’s instructions. To perform the immunohistochemistry, the cells were
fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 20 min. After incubation with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Wako)
in PBS for 10 min, the cells were blocked with PBS containing 2% FBS and 2% bovine
serum albumin (BSA) for 50 min, the cells were incubated with a primary antibody
(described in SI Appendix, Table S1) at 4°C overnight, and finally, incubated with a
secondary antibody (described in SI Appendix, Table S2) at room temperature for 1 hr.
ELISA
23
The culture supernatants, which were incubated for 24 hr after fresh medium was
added, were collected and analyzed for the amount of ALB secretion by ELISA. Human
Albumin ELISA Quantitation Set was purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. ELISA was
performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amount of ALB secretion
was calculated according to each standard followed by normalization to the protein
content per well.
Urea Secretion
The culture supernatants, which were incubated for 24 hr after fresh medium was
added, were collected and analyzed for the amount of urea secretion. QuantiChrom Urea
Assay Kit was purchased from BioAssay Systems. The experiment was performed
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amount of urea secretion was
calculated according to each standard followed by normalization to the protein content
per well.
PHHs Culture
Platable cryopreserved human hepatocytes were purchased from VERITAS (lot
AKB, BEB, DOO, FCL, IZT, OHO, QOQ, YEM, and YOW), CellzDirect (Hu8072),
XenoTech (HC2-14), and Lonza (7F3063). The vials of hepatocytes were rapidly
thawed in a shaking water bath at 37°C, and then the contents of the vial were emptied
into prewarmed Cryopreserved Hepatocyte Recovery Medium (CHRM, Life
Technologies) and the suspension was centrifuged at 750 rpm for 10 min at room
temperature. The hepatocytes were seeded at 1.25x105 cells/cm
2 in HCM containing
10% FBS (Life Technologies) onto Cellmatrix Type I-A acid-soluble type I collagen
(Nitta Gelatin)-coated plates. The medium was replaced at 6 hr after seeding. The
hepatocytes, which were cultured 48 hr after plating the cells, were used in the
experiments.
Embryoid Body Formation and Teratoma Assay
The generation of embryoid bodies and in vitro differentiation was performed as
described elsewhere (14). For the teratoma assay, subcutaneous transplantation of the
PHH-iPSCs (1×106 cells/NOG mouse) was performed. At 6 weeks from the
24
transplantation, the tumors were harvested and fixed in 4% PFA. Hematoxylin and
eosin staining was carried out at the Applied Medical Research Laboratories, Inc. All
animal experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines.
STR Analysis
Total DNA was isolated from the PHHs and PHH-iPSCs using a DNeasy Blood &
Tissue Kit (Qiagen). STR analysis was carried out at Takara Bio, Inc. As shown in SI
Appendix, Fig. S2C, the PHH1-iPSCs indeed originated from PHH1. All other
PHH-iPSCs also originated from PHHs.
Determination of CYP2D6 SNP
Total DNA was isolated from the PHHs and PHH-iPSCs using a DNeasy Blood &
Tissue Kit (Qiagen). SNP analysis was carried out at the Falco SD Holdings Co., Ltd. A
summary of the genotyping of CYP2D6 polymorphisms (CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8,
*16, and *21) is shown in SI Appendix, Table S3. Although the CYP2D6
polymorphism genotype was examined in more than 50 lots of PHHs, there were only
two PHH donors who had the two null alleles for CYP2D6 (*4/*4). The PHH-WT used
in Figure 4 were randomly chosen, and then purchased from the companies described
above in the “PHHs Culture” section.
Western Blotting Analysis
The human iPSC-derivatives and PHHs were homogenized with lysis buffer (20
mM HEPES, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton X-100) containing a protease
inhibitor mixture (Sigma). After being frozen and thawed, the homogenates were
centrifuged at 15,000 g at 4°C for 10 minutes, and the supernatants were collected.
The lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 7.5% polyacrylamide gel, and then
transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore). After the reaction was
blocked with 1% skim milk in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature for
1 hr, the membranes were incubated with anti-human CYP2D6 or β-actin antibodies at
4°C overnight, followed by reaction with horseradish peroxidaseconjugated anti-mouse
IgG antibodies at room temperature for 1 hr. The band was visualized by ECL Plus
Western blotting detection reagents (GE Healthcare) and the signals were read using an
LAS-4000 imaging system (Fuji Film). All the antibodies are listed in SI Appendix,
25
Table S1.
SI Appendix, References
1. Takayama K, et al. (2012) Efficient generation of functional hepatocytes from
human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells by HNF4alpha
transduction. Mol Ther 20(1):127-137.
2. Takayama K, et al. (2012) Generation of metabolically functioning hepatocytes from
human pluripotent stem cells by FOXA2 and HNF1alpha transduction. J Hepatol
57(3):628-636.
3. Takayama K, et al. (2013) Long-Term Self-Renewal of Human ES/iPS-Derived
Hepatoblast-like Cells on Human Laminin 111-Coated Dishes. Stem Cell Reports
1(4):322-335.
4. Inamura M, et al. (2011) Efficient generation of hepatoblasts from human ES cells
and iPS cells by transient overexpression of homeobox gene HEX. Mol Ther
19(2):400-407.
5. Takayama K, et al. (2011) Efficient and directive generation of two distinct
endoderm lineages from human ESCs and iPSCs by differentiation stage-specific
SOX17 transduction. PLoS One 6(7):e21780.
6. Takayama K, et al. (2014) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-mediated regulation of
TGFbeta receptor 2 expression determines the hepatoblast fate decision.
Development 141(1):91-100.
7. Nishimura K, et al. (2011) Development of defective and persistent Sendai virus
vector: a unique gene delivery/expression system ideal for cell reprogramming. J
Biol Chem 286(6):4760-4771.
8. Mizuguchi H & Kay MA (1998) Efficient construction of a recombinant adenovirus
vector by an improved in vitro ligation method. Hum Gene Ther 9(17):2577-2583.
9. Mizuguchi H & Kay MA (1999) A simple method for constructing E1- and
E1/E4-deleted recombinant adenoviral vectors. Hum Gene Ther 10(12):2013-2017.
10. Kawabata K, Sakurai F, Yamaguchi T, Hayakawa T, & Mizuguchi H (2005) Efficient
gene transfer into mouse embryonic stem cells with adenovirus vectors. Mol Ther
12(3):547-554.
11. Tashiro K, et al. (2008) Efficient adenovirus vector-mediated PPAR gamma gene
transfer into mouse embryoid bodies promotes adipocyte differentiation. J Gene Med
10(5):498-507.
26
12. Tashiro K, et al. (2010) Adenovirus vector-mediated efficient transduction into
human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Reprogram
12(5):501-507.
13. Maizel JV, Jr., White DO, & Scharff MD (1968) The polypeptides of adenovirus. I.
Evidence for multiple protein components in the virion and a comparison of types 2,
7A, and 12. Virology 36(1):115-125.
14. Takahashi K, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human
fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131(5):861-872.