Tempiamas elementas

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    1/22

    `

    Tensile Testing of GEV307 at room Temperature

    Investigation of blade material behaviour underexternal (extreme) conditions.

    Work Package 9

    OB_TG3_R027, rev. 00210345

    Final versionConfidential

    OPTIMAT

    BLADES

    TG 3

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    2/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    Page 2 of 22OPTIMAT BLADESLast saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Change record

    Issue/revision date pages Summary of changes

    Rev 000 200-01-29 18

    Rev 001 2006-02-10 19 Added theoretical values

    Rev 002 2006-03-17 22 Added analyses of failure modes

    Rev 003 2006-03-28 22 New figures 11 and 12

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    3/22

    Tensile testing of GEV307 at room temperature

    Povl Brndsted

    Ris National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    4/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 4 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 4

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    5/22

    Author: Povl BrndstedTitle: Tensile testing of GEV307 in 1- and 2 direction

    @ room temperatureDepartment: Ris

    Optimat report,TG3_R027, rev. 002

    Contract no.:

    Groups own reg. no.:(Fniks PSP-element)

    Sponsorship:

    Cover:

    Pages:Tables:References:

    Abstract (max. 2000 char.):

    Ris National LaboratoryInformation Service

    DepartmentP.O.Box 49DK-4000 RoskildeDenmarkTelephone +45 [email protected]

    Fax +45 46774013

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    6/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 6 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Preface

    This report describes the tensile testing at room temperature of the OPTIMAT alternativematerial. The testing is a part of the deliverables in WP9 in TG3: Investigation of blade

    material behaviour under external (extreme) conditions. Extreme conditions for

    alternative materials

    Based on the findings in phase 1, primarily from WP 8, a test plan has been prepared to

    establish a deeper understanding of the effects of the most detrimental environmental

    effects. These have been found to be elevated temperatures. A supplementary number of

    additional tests on the reference material and an investigation of the behaviour of an

    alternative material (glass fibres in an alternative resin is suggested) under the selected

    conditions are carried out.

    The static tensile test are carried out according to the ISO 527 recommendation with the

    exception that the loading history are selected in loading-unloading sequences in order to

    be able to follow the damage growth during the tests.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 6

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    7/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 7 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    1 Test Programme.

    The full test programme is shown in Figure 1 where the tests described in this report is

    highlighted

    Test matrix for WP9nvronmen a

    conditions No of specimens to be tested

    Laboratory

    Total

    static Fatigue

    Test method T T T I C C T-T T-C C-C

    Laminate

    MD

    0

    MD

    90

    MD

    30

    MD

    90

    MD

    0

    MD

    90

    MD

    0

    MD

    0

    MD

    0

    RT 5 5 5 5 10 5 35 10 10 10

    Riso 5 5 5 5 10 5 35 10

    VTT 0 10

    WMC 0 10

    T 60 C 5 5 5 5 10 5 35 10 10 10

    Riso 5 10 5 20 10

    VTT 5 5 5 15 10

    WMC 0 10

    Figure 1. Test plan for WP 9. Current tests are highlighted.

    All static tests are planed to be carried out according to the international standard

    ISO 527/4 with the exception that the loading history includes loading-unloading

    sequences in order to follow damage evolution.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 7

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    8/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 8 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    2 Material and Test Specimens.

    The material tested is a Glass-Epoxy Multi Directional 5 x Biaxial 806 & 4 x Combi

    1250 laminate vacuum injected with epoxy system E6/H6. The laminate is manufactured

    by LM Glasfiber A/S, material specification number GEV 307. The test specimens for

    the tensile tests are OPTIMAT type I0100 (1 direction) and I0190 (2 direction). They are

    procured by the manufacturer and cut out according to ISO 527-4, type 3 with end tabs.

    Test specimen geometry is shown in Figure 2.

    In Table 1 and Figure 3 the theoretical values for the MD laminate are shown.

    Calculations are performed using the software programme CompositePro with a E-Glass-

    Expoxy laminate material.

    Figure 2. Tensile test specimen.

    Table 1. Laminate for theoretical calculation, Vol % Fibres = 54%

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 8

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    9/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 9 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Laminate Moduli

    MPa

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    Ex Ey GxyExb Eyb Gxyb

    Figure 3. Theoretical Laminate Moduli

    Table 2. Theoretical Values

    LAMINATE PROPERTIES

    Extentional Properties:

    Ex (Pa)= 2.885E+10 Ey (Pa)= 1.549E+10 Gxy (Pa)= 8.151E+09

    NUxy = 4.261E-01 NUyx = 2.288E-01

    Flexural Properties:

    Exb (Pa)= 2.580E+10 Eyb (Pa)= 1.560E+10Gxyb (Pa)=8.992E+09

    NUxyb = -4.562E-01 NUyxb = -2.759E-01

    Thermal Expansion Coefficients (CTE Units = m/m/C, CTEk Units = 1/m/C)

    CTEx = 7.914E-06 CTEy = 2.024E-05 CTExy = 3.708E-11

    CTExk = -9.637E-08 CTEyk = -2.121E-07 CTExyk = -9.170E-06

    Moisture Expansion Coefficients (CME Units = m/m/%, CMEk Units = 1/m/%)

    CMEx = 1.878E-04 CMEy = 1.060E-03 CMExy = 3.358E-09

    CMExk = -7.697E-06 CMEyk = -1.812E-05CMExyk = -6.523E-04

    Physical Properties:Density (gm/m3)=

    1.987E+06Thickness (m)= 6.400E-02

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 9

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    10/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 10 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Test Procedure

    2.1 Tensile testing in 1 direction.The tests were carried out using an Instron 8533 hydraulic test machine

    with mechanical grips. The load is measured using a certified 250 kNdynamic Instron load cell, UK 084. Longitudinal strain is measured using astrain gauge extensometer, Instron type 2620-600, #1747, 1mm, 25 mmgauge length. Transverse strain is measured using a strain gaugeextensometer, Instron type 2620-600, #1747, 1mm, 22.5 mm gauge length.The testing is controlled in position control and run at 2 mm/min. Theloading-unloading test sequences are controlled by Instron Wavemakerprogramme in a block sequence history shown in Figure 4.

    Loading Sequences Tensile tests in 1 direction

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

    Time (sec)

    Displacement(mm)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    Load(kN)

    Figure 4. Loading-unloading sequences for tensile test in 1-direction.

    The test is controlled in the way that the position ramp is reversed when apreset load value is reached. The reason for not choosing a preset strain

    value as target value is that the extensometers can jump when crackingoccurs.

    The test data are sampled in files with a sampling rate of 5 Hz.

    At a load level below failure load ( 60 kN) in the last sequence theextensometers were removed from the specimen in order to protect themfrom damage at the final fracture.

    A typical stress strain curve is shown in Figure 5.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 10

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    11/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 11 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Tensile test GEV307-I0100-11

    -100.0

    0.0

    100.0

    200.0

    300.0

    400.0

    500.0

    600.0

    700.0

    -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

    Strain (%)

    Stress(MPa)

    Series1

    Figure 5. Stress strain curve for a 1-direction tensile test.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 11

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    12/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 12 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    2.2 Tensile testing in 2 direction.The tests were carried out using an Instron 8842 hydraulic test machine

    with Hydraulic grips. The load is measured using a certified 100 kN dynamic

    Instron load cell, UK 054. Longitudinal strain is measured using a straingauge extensometer, Instron type 2620-600, #1747, 1mm, 25 mm gaugelength. Transverse strain is measured using a strain gauge extensometer,Instron type 2620-600, #1747, 1mm, 22.5 mm gauge length. The testing iscontrolled in position control and run at 2 mm/min. The loading-unloadingtest sequences are controlled by Instron Wavemaker programme in a blocksequence history shown in Figure 6.

    Loading Sequences Tensile tests in 2 direction

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    Time (sec)

    Displacement

    (mm)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Load(kN)Load Profile

    Displacement Profile

    Figure 6. Loading-unloading sequences for tensile test in 2-direction.

    The test is controlled in the way that the position ramp is reversed when apreset load value is reached. The reason for not choosing a preset strainvalue as target value is that the extensometers can jump when crackingoccurs.

    The test data are sampled in files with a sampling rate of 5 Hz.

    The extensometers remain mounted on the test specimens until failure

    A typical stress strain curve is shown in Figure 7.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 12

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    13/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 13 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Tensile test GEV307-I0190-03

    -20.0

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    100.0

    120.0

    140.0

    160.0

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Strain (%)

    Stress(MPa)

    Series1

    Figure 7. Stress strain curve for a 2-direction tensile test.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 13

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    14/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 14 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    3 Data Handling.

    The following properties are extracted from the test data:

    Stiffness, Youngs Modulus:

    According to the ISO 527 the tensile modulus are defined as the slope of the stress strain

    curve in uniaxial tension between 0.05% and 0.25% strain. In order to measure a well

    defined modulus, it must be assured that the strain limits between which the slope is

    determined are correct. Hence, it is required, that the intercept point for the elastic line

    must be origin (0,0) in the stress-strain diagram. See Figure 8.

    Poissons ratio

    Poissons ration is defined as the ratio between transverse strain and longitudinal strain.

    It is calculated as the slope of the (T. strain L. strain) line in the same range as therange wherein the Stiffness is calculated. See Figure 8.

    Secant modulus:

    This is defined as the slope of the unloading-loading loop parameters and calculated as a

    linear regression of all data in a loop. See Figure 9

    Loop stiffness and Loop Poisson ratio

    Loop stiffness and strain ration in the unloading-loading loop. Slope of stress-strain and

    L-strain-T-strain curve between 0.05% - 0.25% strain from minimum strain in the loop.

    Damping

    Defined as the area of the normalized loading-unloading hysteresis loop, Figure 10.

    Normalization values are mean and amplitude values. I.e.

    Normalised value = (Value-(max+min))/(max-min)

    Maximum-minimum strain in the unloading-loading loop

    Maximum and minimum strains in the unloading-loading loop are found from the data.

    All properties are automatically extracted from the data files in an Excel spreadsheet.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 14

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    15/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 15 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Initial Stiffness and Poisson Ratio.

    y = 269.42x - 9E-14

    -20

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

    Longitudinal Strain (%)

    Stress(MPa)

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    TransverseStrain(%)

    Loading unloading

    sequences

    Array between

    0.05% and 25% for

    definition of Modulus

    Elastic line through

    (0,0) Line for calculating Poisson's

    ratio

    Figure 8. Diagram illustrating the calculation of stiffness and Poisson's ratio.

    Unloading-Loading loop

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Strain (%)

    Stress(MPa)

    Loop Stiffness

    Secant modulus

    Figure 9. Unloading-loading loop

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 15

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    16/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 16 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Normalised Unloading-Loading loop

    -1.5

    -1.0

    -0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50

    Strain (%)

    Stress(MPa)

    Damping = Area of

    normalised hysteresis loop

    Figure 10. Diagram showing a normalized unloading-loading loop.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 16

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    17/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 17 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    4 Test results.

    The results from the tensile tests in the 1 direction are shown in Table 3, and the damageparameters from the loop analyses are shown in Figure 11.

    Results from tensile tests in the 2 direction is shown in Table 4 and Figure 12. Tensile

    strength and Strain to failure in Tests GEV307-I0190-01 and GEV307-I0190-02 are non-

    valid because of failure in the grips. Se section 5.

    Table 3. Results tensile test in 1-direction

    Results Table GEV307-I0100

    Specimen #Width(mm)

    Thickness(mm)

    Young'sModulus(MPa)

    PoissonsRatio

    TensileStrength(MPa)

    Strain tofailure(%)

    GEV307-I0100-07 6.52 25.38 27.39 0.39 655 3.04

    GEV307-I0100-08 6.53 25.45 27.44 0.43 616 2.85

    GEV307-I0100-09 6.51 25.62 26.67 0.39 629 3.10

    GEV307-I0100-10 6.50 25.59 29.16 0.42 596 2.78

    GEV307-I0100-11 6.49 25.55 26.94 0.40 580 2.97

    Average 27.52 0.41 615 2.95

    Stdev 0.97 0.02 29 0.13

    Stdev (%) 3.5 5.0 4.7 4.5

    Table 4. Results tensile test in 2-directio. Marked cells indicate non-valid results

    Results Table GEV307-I0190

    Specimen #

    Width

    (mm)

    Thickness

    (mm)

    Young's

    Modulus

    (MPa)

    Poissons

    Ratio

    Tensile

    Strength

    (MPa)

    Strain to

    failure (%)

    GEV307-I0190-01 6.69 25.51 13.93 0.22 118 1.72

    GEV307-I0190-02 6.87 25.40 13.85 0.20 138 2.42

    GEV307-I0190-03 6.82 25.53 13.99 0.16 139 2.47

    GEV307-I0190-04 6.76 25.54 14.12 0.18 140 2.44

    GEV307-I0190-05 6.75 25.52 14.24 0.18 140 2.46

    Average 14.02 0.19 140 2.46

    Stdev 0.16 0.02 1 0.02

    Stdev (%) 1.1 13.1 0.6 0.8

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 17

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    18/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 18 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Tensile tests - 1 direction GEV307 - Damage in Loading-unloading

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

    Strain (%)

    Stiffness(InitialandSecant)(GPa)

    -0.20

    -0.10

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.50

    0.60

    0.70

    0.80

    Interceptstrain(%),Damping,

    Poisson'sration

    Stiffness

    Secant ModulusIntercept

    Poissons ratio

    Damping

    Figure 11. Damage properties from tensile tests in 1-direction.

    Tensile tests - 2 direction GEV307 - Damage in Loading-unloading

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

    Strain (%)

    Stiffness(InitialandSecant)(GPa)

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    0.40

    0.45

    0.50

    Interceptstrain(%),Damping,

    Poisson'sration

    Stiffness

    Secant ModulusIntercept

    Poissons ratio

    Damping

    Figure 12. Damage properties from tensile tests in 2-direction.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 18

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    19/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 19 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    5 Failure modes.

    Photographs of the failure modes of the specimens tested are shown in Figure 13 andFigure 14 (1-direction tests, and Figure 15 and Figure 16 (2 direction tests).

    The failures in 1 direction can be characterized as overall splitting in the gauge area. The

    failures are apparently not influenced by the gripping and tabs areas.

    The failures in the 2-direction are localized. For specimens 1 and 2 the failure is directly

    localized in the grip, whereas specimens 3, 4, and 5 fails localized close to the tabs and

    grips. These failures could be affected by bending. Based on the failure observations, the

    results from specimen 1 and 2 must be regarded as non-valid.

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 19

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    20/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 20 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Figure 13. Failure modes of GEV307-I0100 test specimens from the edge

    Figure 14. Failure modes of GEV307-I0100 test specimens from the front

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 20

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    21/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 21 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Figure 15. Failure modes of specimens GEV-I0190 seen from the edge

    Figure 16. Failure modes of specimens GEV-I0190 seen from the front

    Optimat report, TG3_R027, rev. 003 21

  • 8/2/2019 Tempiamas elementas

    22/22

    OB_TG3_R027

    OPTIMAT BLADES Page 22 of 22Last saved 3/29/2006 3:00:00 PM

    Mission

    To promote an innovative and environmentally sustainable

    technological development within the areas of energy, industrial

    technology and bioproduction through research, innovation and

    advisory services.

    Vision

    Riss research shall extend the boundaries for the

    understanding of natures processes and interactions right

    down to the molecular nanoscale.

    The results obtained shall set new trends for the development

    of sustainable technologies within the fields of energy, industrial

    technology and biotechnology.

    The efforts made shall benefit Danish society and lead to the

    development of new multi-billion industries.