The Living Matrix - magyar szöveg

8/6/2019 The Living Matrix - magyar szveg

1/54

LIVING MATRIX

Az l mtrix

[Introductory music]

Bevezet zene

NARRATOR: Five year old Demitri was born with cerebral palsy. There is no medical

cure for this condition.

Az t ves Demitri szletse kzben agyvzst kapott. llapotn orvosimdszerekkel nem lehet javtani.

ILIANA (in translation from Greek (grgbl fordtva): When Demitri was born, the

doctors told us he might never be able to walk, never be independent; that

he would have, since this was a chronic disease, certain damage to his

health, that he might never recover from. We have not tried anyalternative. Personally, I trusted nothing but the standard approaches until

some people we trusted, because we knew them well, told us about Eric.

Demitri szletsekor az orvosok azt mondtk neknk, hogy valsznlegsohasem fog jrni s nem lesz nll, - s mivel ez egy olyan krnikusbetegsg, amely krostotta az egszsgt, lehetsges, hogy soha nem fog felplni. Nem prblkoztunk semmilyen alternatvval. Szemly szerintn kizrlag a hagyomnyos orvosi mdszerekben bztam, egszen addig,amg nhny kzeli ismersnk meg nem ismertetett bennnket Erikkel.

ERIC PEARL: We think of healing as getting up out of wheelchairs, vision returning,hearing returning, cancers disappearing, all sorts of things. And thesethings happen. They happen.

ltalban gy gondolunk a gygyulsra, mint hogy emberek szllnak ki atolkocsibl, visszanyernik a ltsukat, visszakapjk a hallsukat,megsznik a rkbetegsgk s hasonlk. s ezek a dolgok meg istrtnnek. Valban megtrtnnek.

ILIANA(in translation):fordtsban The idea initially was just to attend a seminar that

might show us some ways to help Demitri as a family.

Eleinte mindssze csak annyi trtnt, hogy rszt vettnk egy szeminriumon, aholmegmutattak nhny mdszert, amivel mint csald segthetnk Dimitrillapotn.

ERIC PEARL:This little boy's parents came up and said will I do a healing session after a

presentation that I gave them. I said, "Well, they're closing the room, but

let me finish signing these books and we'll get them to keep the room open

1


2/54

for just a little bit longer. What's wrong?" And they explained he had

cerebral palsy.

A kisfi szlei odajttek hozzm elads utn s megkrdeztk, hogy elvgeznk-eegy kezelst. Azt feleltem nekik, hogy Br mr zrjk a termet, engedjk

meg, hogy befejezzem ezeknek a knyveknek a dediklst, aztnmegkrjk, hogy egy kicsivel tovbb maradhassunk. Mi a baj? Ekkorelmondtk, hogy a fi agyi bnulsban szenved.

ILIANA (in translation): After the seminar was completed, they met for the first

time, just for a short while, about ten or 15 minutes.

Amikor vget rt a szeminrium, akkor tallkoztunk elszr, csupn egyrvid ideig, krlbell 15 percig.

ERIC PEARL:There's something in cerebral palsy that's very common where your feet,

instead of your feet being able to be flat on the ground, the heel was up.So his heel would not be able to touch the ground. He was scheduled for

surgery for that. He had to wear supports and braces. For him to be ableto get up, he'd have to hold on to furniture or people's clothing. For him to

be able to go down any steps at all, he'd have to sit down on the steps and

push himself down a step at a time. And to go up, he'd have to crawl on

his hands and knees.

Az agyi bnuls jellemz tnete, hogy a talpak nem kpesek megrinteni a talajts a sarok felfel emelkedik. Dimitri sarka sem tudta megrinteni a talajt.Emiatt mr mttre is eljegyeztk s ortopd tmasztkokat s fzket iskellett viselnie. Ahhoz, hogy fel tudjon llni ms emberekben a vagybtorokban kellett megkapaszkodnia. Ahhoz hogy egyltaln le tudjonmenni valamilyen lpcsn, le kellett lni s lpcsrl-lpcsre lecsszni.Ahhoz hogy feljusson, a trdn s a kezn kellett msznia.

ILIANA (in translation): We stepped on the stage with Demitri, put him on the bed

that was there, and told him that he should stay calm and collaborate with

Eric. And that nothing would happen that might bother him. It was

strange for us to think that this man was trying to heal him using hishands, and yet without actually touching him.

Felmentnk a sznpadra Demitrivel s az ott ll gyra fektettk. Mondtuk neki,hogy maradjon nyugodt s kvesse Erik utastsait - semmi olyan nemtrtnhet, ami kellemetlen lehet. Szmunkra nagyon furcsa volt, hogy ezaz ember a kezeivel prblja t meggygytani, gy hogy hozz sem r.

ERIC PEARL: He got up after four minutes, and was not just walking; he was jumping

and he was running.

2


3/54

Ngy perc mlva felkelt s nemcsak hogy jrt, hanem ugrlt s szaladt is!

ILIANA (in translation): It was a huge surprise, and a great joy for us. But at thesame time, we were left wondering, how did this all work so fast, so

directly, and so effectively. He was walking properly, not standing on his

tiptoes. And there was no need for anyone to help him climb the stairs,which was what usually happened. Other children, they naturally walk up

and down the stairs every day. But Demitri was unable to do this. So

accomplishing such things is very important for him.

risi meglepets s hatalmas rm volt ez szmunkra! Ugyanakkor nemgyztnk csodlkozni azon, hogy hogyan is mkdhetett mindez ilyengyorsan, ilyen kzvetlenl s ilyen hatkonyan. Rendesen jrt s mr nem pipiskedett a lbujjain. Nem volt mr szksge msvalaki segtsgre,ahhoz hogy felmenjen a lpcsn, mint korbban. Ms gyerekektermszetesen nap mint nap fl-le mszklnak a lpcsn, de Demitri ezt

eddig nem tudta megtenni. Az hogy kpes legyen ilyen dolgokvgrehajtsa, nagyon fontos szmra.

ERIC PEARL: They brought him back down for another session. He had one hand that

was closed. I didn't know. He looked at me in Greek, and he said, "Look,

I can open my hand." He was just five. He said, "It doesn't hurt

anymore." He said, "Look, I can hold a glass and drink by myself."

(Nemsokkal ksbb)visszahoztk t egy msik kezelsre. Az egyik kzfeje sszevolt csukva. Nem is tudtam rla. Rm nzett s grgl azt mondta: Nzdki tudom nyitni a kezemet! Mg csak t ves volt. Azt mondta: Mr nem fj tbbet. - majd hoztette: Nzd! Meg tudom tartani a poharat studok egyedl inni!

ILIANA (in translation): Now his fist is open. It is relaxed and cooperates with the

left hand much better, which is very helpful. It's not closed into a fist,which bothered him a lot. And when he wants to give us a hug, he used to

do it with only one hand. Now, he gives a full hug, and says, "You see, I

can do it, I'm a big boy now." Of course, his hand isn't fully functional

yet, but together with the left hand, it works somehow. And he doesn'treject it.

Most mr ki-be nylik az kle. Lazn tudja tartani s sokkal jobban sszetudja hangolni a jobb s bal kezvel, ami nagyon hasznos. Mr nem szorulklbe, ami nagyon zavarta t. Rgebben ha meg akart lelni bennnket,csak egy kezvel tette. Most mr teljesen t tud lelni s azt mondja:Ltod, meg tudom csinlni! Most mr nagyfi vagyok. Termszetesen akeze mg nem mkdik tkletesen, de a bal kezvel egytt valahogymkdik s legalbb elkezdte hasznlni.

3


4/54

NARRATOR: Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of re-connective healing, is that it

can be learned.

A legcsodlatosabb dolog az jra-kapcsold gygytsban az, hogy brkimegtanulhatjha!

ILIANA (in translation)fordtsban: Now, I didn't believe that this was something one

can learn. I thought it was something only Eric was capable of doing. I

didn't think I could acquire these skills, too, and help you, my neighbor,my friend. But in the course of the program, right away we saw for

ourselves that yes, you can indeed learn to help others. If you see the

living example standing in front of your eyes, as we see our own child,

then I think that yes, you believe it.

n sem hittem el, hogy ez valami olyasmi, amit brki megtanulhat. Aztgondoltam, hogy ez valami olyan, amit csak Erik kpes megtenni. Nem

gondoltam, hogy n is megszerezhetem ezeket a kpessgeket s segtenitudok a szomszdomnak vagy a bartomnak. De a program sorn mimagunk is lthattuk, hogy igen, valjban megtanulhat hogyan segtsnkmsokon. Ha az l pldt ltod a szemed eltt, mint ahogyan mi a sajtgyereknket ltjuk, akkor azt gondolom, igen, te is hinni fogsz benne.

NARRATOR: There are amazing healings taking place all the time. Yet, traditionalallopathic medicine has no model or explanation for how these healings

can occur.

Csodlatos gygyulsok trtnnek minden pillanatban. Mgis a hagyomnyosallopatikus orvoslsnak nincs magyarzata arra, hogy ezek a gygyulsokhogyan fordulhatnak el.

MARILYN SCHLITZ: We don't understand how it is that even the simplest thing like,

you know, the healing from a wound that is so mundane that every childhas experienced it, we don't have a full understanding of how that occurs.

Mg nem rtjk pontosan, mi hogyan mkdik. Mg a legegyszerbb dolgokesetben is, mint pldul egy seb begygyulsa pedig ez annyirahtkznapi, hogy minden gyerek megtapasztalta mr sem rtjk teljesenhogyan is trtnik valjban.

NARRATOR: The answers may lie in the fundamental shift which is occurring in our

understanding of our universe.

A vlasz valsznleg abban az alapvet szemlletvltsban rejlik, amely azuniverzum mkdsnek megrtsre vonatkozik.

4


5/54

LYNNE MCTAGGART: Virtually every ancient culture and every native culture has

thought of the universe as a unity, as a circle. And man as being central to

that. And it was only with the discoveries of Isaac Newton and ReneDescartes that ripped us out of the fabric of our universe, and created this

clockwork model where mind is separate from body and that we are

separate from each other. And that idea of separation is the foundation ofwestern thinking. Now, Newton described a very well behaved universe

of separate things operating in space and time according to fixed laws.

Theidea of the body as machine, the body as this well-behaved machine, with thetwo engines of the body being the brain and the heart, and the whole

central orchestra being conducted by DNA--that's the model we have.

And we think of various processes being localized in certain parts of the body. What's wrong with that is just about everything. Body is

completely decentralized. There is no central brain, in a sense, and that

the brain is closer to a, an antenna receiver. It's closer to a transducer of

information, a receiver and a transmitter of information, but not the centralrepository of that information.

Minden si kultra s minden termszeti npcsoport az univerzumot egyegysgnek, egy krnek kpzelte el. Ennek a vilgnak a kzepn llt azember. Csupn Issac Newton s Ren Descartes felfedezsi kvetkeztbentptk ki az embert az univerzum szvetbl s hoztk ltre azt az ramszer vilgmodellt, ahol is az elme el van vlasztva a testtl s az emberekel vannak vlasztva egymstl. Ennek az elvlasztottsgnak az eszmjevlt a nyugati gondolkods alapjv. Newton egy szfogad univerzummkdst rta le, ahol a klnvlasztott dolgok egymstl fggetlenl,meghatrozott trvnyek szerint mkdnek trben s idben.

Jelenleg azzal modellel rendelkeznk, amely a test mint gp gondolatra pl.E modell szerint a test egy jl mkd gpezet, melynek kt motorja van,az agy s a szv, s melynek kzponti zenekart a DNS veznyli. Aztgondoljuk, hogy a klnbz testi folyamatok a test bizonyos rszeihezvannak rendelve. Ebben az elkpzelsben csak az hibdzik, hogy ezegyltaln nem gy van. A hagyomnyos rtelembe vve nincs kzpontiagy az egy leginkbb egy TV antennhoz hasonlthat. Leginkbb egyinformci talakthoz hasonlt, amely az informcit felfogja stovbbtja, de semmikppen nem az informci trolja.

BRUCE LIPTON: In our conventional world of biochemistry and cellular biology wefocus on a Newtonian belief of a material world. Through the history ofscience we focus on the mechanical reality, and have let go of the concept

of energy and fields as information and biology. That's a Newtonian

perspective that says "focus on the matter, don't pay attention to the rest of

the stuff." Except that we're now recognizing that the mind, which is an

5


6/54


7/54

a vilg nem gy mkdik, ahogyan azt eddig lltottk. A dolgok nem gymkdnek. A fizikban risi anomlikat fedeztek fel, melyeket nem leheta hagyomnyos modellel megmagyarzni. A kvantumfizika legfbbkvetkezmnye az lett, hogy a mechanikus univerzum rgi vilgkpt ahol minden egy bizonyos ok miatt, a sajt trvnyei szerint trtnik el

kellett vetni. NARRATOR: Quantum physics changed our perception of reality over 80 years ago.

Surprisingly this new viewpoint has yet to be incoorporated into ourcurrent biology model.

A kvantum fizika mr nyolcvan vvel ezeltt megvltoztatta a valsggalkapcsolatos felfogsunkat. Meglep mdon ezt az j nzpontot mg bekell pteni a jelenlegi biolgiai modellnkbe.

RUPERT SHELDRAKE: The main problem with the current biology model is that

it's reductionist and mechanistic. That means first it tries to explaineverything in terms of little bits; generally molecules, 'cause they're the

smallest things in organisms. And secondly, it tries to treat the organismas a machine that works simply in terms of physics and chemistry.

A jelenlegi biolgiai modell legfbb hibja az, hogy redukcionista smechanisztikus. Ez egyrszt azt jelenti, hogy mindent kis egysgek formjban prbl megmagyarzni; ltalban a molekulkkal, hiszenezek az organizmusok legkisebb rszei. Msrszt az organizmust mint egygpet prblja kezelni, melyet a fizika s kmia trvnyei irnytanak.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: Chemical reaction in the body is supposed to be central. And

the main reason it occurs, according to current theory, is throughmolecular collision so that one molecule collides into another, and that's

how they have this information and how we have a cascade of chemical

processes. Now, if you think of the usual cell, a cell is like a swimmingpool, and molecules are like a couple of tennis balls in that swimming

pool. And according to this theory, one tennis ball is supposed to find

another tennis ball in this vast body of water, and do so instantaneously.

And that is supposed to account for all the millions of instantaneousactivities that occur in our body at every second. And that's ludicrous.

Azt felttelezik, hogy a testben a lezajl kmiai reakcik kzponti irnyts alattllnak. A jelenlegi elmletek szerint a molekulris tkzs miatt jn ltrereakci, azaz egy molekula beletkzik egy msikba s ez ltal adjk tegymsnak az informcit gy zajlik le a kmiai reakcik sokasga.(Namost), ha elkpzelnk egy hagyomnyos sejtet: egy sejt olyan mint egyszmedence s a molekulk olyanok, mint nhny teniszlabda amelyikebben az szmedencben lebeg. A jelenlegi elmlet szerint az egyikteniszlabdnak meg kellene tallnia a msik teniszlabdt ebben a

7


8/54

hatalmas vztmegben, s mitbb, azonnal. s ezzel a folyamattalmagyarzhat mindaz a millinyi tevkenysg, amely lejtszdik atestnkben minden egyes msodpercben. Ez nevetsges elkpzels.

PETER FRASER: The existing control system of modern medicine is enzymes,

hormones, not consciousness, not emotions, not body field. All that isthere, as your control system, is enzymes and hormones. And we find this

a bit inadequate to explain the whole majesty of human behavior and

sickness, and the whole damn thing, it's impossible.

A modern orvosls szerint a ltez irnyt rendszer enzimekbl s hormonokbl,nem pedig tudatbl, rzelmekbl s test mezbl ll. Minden ami az emberirnytrendszert alkotja, csupn enzimek s hormonok sokasga. Mi eztaz elkpzelst nem tartjuk megfelel magyarzatnak, amely kpes lennemegmagyarzni a teljes emberi viselkeds nagysgt, a betegsgekkialakulst s az egsz hatalmas rendszert ez gy lehetetlen.

DIETMAR CIMBAL (in translation): Today's medicine still works on the old

paradigm of physics, which dates back to the time of Newton and theprimacy of matter. Modern physics has long ago eliminated that paradigm

and understands that it is not matter, but mind or spirit, which is primary,

though it isn't defined as spirit, but as energy fields, as intelligent energy

fields.

(fordtsbl): A mai orvosls mg mindig a rgi fizika paradigmin nyugszik,amely Newton idejre s az anyag eldlegessgre nylik vissza. Amodern fizika mr rges-rg kiiktatta ezt a paradigmt s megrtette,hogy nem az anyag, hanem az elme vagy szellem az elsdleges, br eztnem szellemknt hanem energia mezknt intelligens energia mezknt hatrozza meg.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: We look to science as some sort of absolute truth, and a storythat's already been written. But the, the reality is that science is a story

told in installments. And every new chapter often times refines or

completely changes what has come before.

gy tekintnk a tudomnyra, mint valamifle abszolt igazsgra egy olyantrtnetre amelyet mr megrtak. Pedig az igazsg az, hogy a tudomnyegy folytatsos regny. Minden j fejezet gyakran tovbb fzi, jrartelmezi vagy teljesen megvltoztatja az elzleg trtnteket.

PETER FRASER: There is an intellectual pendulum swing, and it's swinging towardsthe idea of holism and looking at how an entire system works together.

Whereas you see the doctors began to look at how each individual cell

works, and they got down to the cellular level. That's all been done for a

8


9/54

hundred years, great, we understand it a lot. But we don't understand how

the cells talk to each other, and how they deal with information.

Egy intellektulis elmozduls ltszik, amely a holizmus irnyba lengeti az ingts azt vizsglja, hogyan mkdik az az egsz rendszer egyttesen. Mg azt

lttuk, hogy az orvosok azt kezdtk vizsglni, hogyan mkdnek az egyessejtek nmagukban, eljutottak a sejtek szintjre. Ezt vizsgltk vagy szzvig, s nagyszer hogy most mr sokat rtnk ebbl. De mg mindig nemrtjk hogy a sejtek hogyan beszlnek egymssal s hogy hogyan kezelikaz infomcit.

MARILYN SCHLITZ: When I was 15 years old, I had a very serious motorcycle

accident. I was on a motorcycle I shouldn't have been on, and we were hitby a car that caused a very serious wound in my leg, ended up with 66

stitches. At the point of impact, I clearly remember having an out of body

experience where my consciousness watched my body tumbling through

the air and ultimately landing. And it was sort of shocking to me when Ikind of came back into the body. That said to me that perhaps my

consciousness isn't just in my brain, but that it is imbued with more qualitythan that. And then, as I was facing a very serious outcome, they talked

about the possibility of having to amputate part of my leg. I remember

laying with a cast from my hip down to my ankle and thinking about how

to rally my immune system through my thoughts, such that I couldpromote healing in my leg. And so I would lay on the couch and I would

visualize my immune system. And I could feel it tingling. I could feel the

healing happening in my leg. And it didn't come from a medical feeling. Ihave no idea at all where this idea came from. But somehow it was noetic,

it came directly to me that that was what I needed to do. And ultimately

they took the cast off and I'm, you know, I'm a two-legged creature still,thank goodness. And so I think that there was something about, you

know, my own personal experience with that, that healing, that there was

something about recognizing that my mind was important to my body, andmy body was important to my mind, that, that I just knew intuitively.

Amikor 15 ves voltam, nagyon slyos motorbicikli balesetet szenvedtem. Egymotorbiciklin voltam, amin nem kellett volna, s elttt egy aut. Igenkomoly srlst okozott a lbamon, melyet vgl 66 ltssel varrtak ssze.Az tkzskor tisztn emlkszem, hogy testen kvli lmnyem volt atudatom kvlrl figyelte ahogyan a testem tbucskzik a levbegben,majd vgl fldet r. Elg megrz volt amikor vgl visszatrtem atestembe. Ez azt az zenetet hordozta szmomra, hogy a tudatom nemcsupn az agyamban van, hanem jval tbb minsggel rzkel. s mikorszembe kellett nznem az igen slyos kvetkezmnyekkel mely szerint aztmondtk, hogy valsznleg amputlni kell a lbamat emlkszem, hogyott fekdtem a cspmtl a bokmig begipszelve s arra gondoltam,hogyan kapcsoljam be az immunrendszeremet, hogy elsegtsem a lbam

9


10/54

gygyulst. gy teht lefekdtem a heverre s elkpzeltem a sajtimmun rendszeremet. reztem ahogyan bizsereg. reztem a gygyulst albamban. Ez nem valami gygytsi rzs volt. Fogalmam sincs, hogyhonnan jtt az tlet. De valahogy tudatos volt s nylvnval volt szmomra, hogy ezt kell tennem. s vgl levettk a gipszet, s hla

Istennek, mg mindig ktlb llny vagyok. gy a sajt lmnyemalapjn azt gondolom,, hogy volt a gygytsban valami, ami felismertehogy a tudatom fontos a testem szmra, s hogy a testem fontos atudatom szmra, s ezt csak gy tudtam, intuitiv mdon.

NARRATOR: Mind. Intention. Belief. Can these factors influence healing?

Elme. Szndk. Hit. Befolysolhatjk ezek a tnyezk a gygyulst?

HERMAN KONING: If you think you have an incurable disease, if you think it

yourself, you are right. If you think your problem is curable, then you arealso right. It all depends on your intention.

Ha gy gondolod, hogy gygythatatlan betegsged van, ha elhiszed, akkorigazad is lesz. Ha gy gondolod, hogy a problmd gygythat, akkorszintn igazad lesz. Mindez a szndkodon mlik.

MARILYN SCHLITZ: When you think about intention, what is intention? And

how does intention play a role in healing? Intention plays a role when you

think about how our thoughts and our emotions and our cognitionsinfluence our immune system and our endocrine system. And we know

that this happens. We know that people who feel a tremendous amount of

stress, for example, have a diminished capacity in terms of their immunesystems functioning.

Ha a szndkra gondolunk mit is jelent, hogy szndk? s milyen szerepettlt be a gygyulsban? A szndknak akkor van jelentsge, habelegondolunk, hogy gondolataink, rzelmeink s felfogsunkbefolysoljk az immun s endokrin rendszernket. Ma mr tudjuk, hogyez gy van. Tudjuk pldul, hogy azoknak az embereknek, akiket rengetegstresszt r, az immunrendszere legyengl s kevsb mkdik.

EDGAR MITCHELL: It's been discovered in the laboratory, over the last 15 or 20years, for example, that intention does have physical effects.

Laboratriumi krlmnyek kztt fedeztk fel, az utbbi 15 vagy 20 vben, hogya szndk-nak fizikai hatsai vannak.

MARILYN SCHLITZ: So for example we recently conducted a study where we

recruited couples, one of whom had cancer. And we took the partner of

10


11/54

the cancer patient and we trained them in what we call "the compassionate

intention program." And so they were invited into participate in a training

program. A lot of it had to do with meditation, it had to do with heartopening, it had to do with subtle energies. And we took them to this

training program, and then we asked them to go home and continue to

practice this intervention for eight weeks. We brought them back, and weput them in our laboratory. And we monitored the patient in one room,

and we put them in a 2000 pound, electromagnetically shielded room, so

that there was no possibility of electromagnetic fields, or the partner of thecancer patient talking to them on the radio, on their cell phone, and saying,

"Okay, breathe deeply now." We could rule out any of those kind of

conventional explanations.

(gy pldul) nemrgiben lefolytattunk egy ksrletet, ahol olyan prokatvizsgltunk, ahol az egyik flnek rkja volt. Megtantottuk a rkbetegeklettrsait arra, amit mi egyttrz szndk programnak hvunk.

Meghvtuk ket, hogy vegyenek rszt a kpzsi programban. Ennek nagyrsze meditcival, a szv megnyitsval, s a finomenergikkal lltkapcsolatban. Miutn elvgeztk a kpzst megkrtk ket, hogy otthon is folytassk a beavatkoz gyakorlatot nyolc hten kersztl. Ezutnvisszatrtek a laboratriumba vizsglatra. A pcienseket egy 90 kilspajzs mg, egy elektromagnetikusan lernykolt szobban helyeztk el, -teht semmilyen elektromgneses hullm nem juthatott el hozzjuk gy apartnerk sem mondhatta nekik rdin vagy mobilon, hogy Ok. Mostllegezz mllyen!. Ezzel kizrhattunk minden ehhez hasonlkonvencionlis magyarzatot.

Meanwhile, the partner, who'd gone to the training program, sat in another room

and watched the image of their loved one on a closed circuit televisionscreen. And then at random times throughout the session, they were asked

to send loving, compassionate intentions to the patient. The idea was to

see if we could find correlations between the intention of the one person,and the physiological activity of the other. What we found is that there

was a significant correlation in the physiological activity of this person

and the physiological activity of the other. And this suggests that there is

some way in which information is transferred, that isn't accountable by theconventional, Newtonian model of cause and effect. You know, the

partner of the cancer patient wasn't coming in and whispering in their

partner's ear, "Calm down now." You know, quite the contrary. Theywere at a distance and there was no way that the two people knew when

this kind of interaction was happening, and yet it happened.

Ezalatt a partnere, aki rszt vett a kpzsi programon, egy msikszobban lt s egy zrt kr TV lncon keresztl figyelte szeretett prjta kpernyn. Aztn a ksrlet ideje alatt megkrtk ket, hogy egy adott pillanatban fejezzk ki szeret, egyttrz szndkukat a pciens fel.

11


12/54

Arra voltunk kivncsiak, hogy van-e mrhet egyezs a szndk kifejezses a pciens fizikai reakcii kztt. Ha igen, akkor ez azt sugallja, hogyltezik valamilyen md arra, hogy az informci tjusson, amelyet nemlehet a hagyomnyos newtoni ok-okozati modellel megmagyarzni. Vagyishogy, nem a rkos beteg trsa megy be a szobba s sgja a flbe, hogy

nyugodj meg!. pp ellenkezleg. A kt ember trben el volt vlasztvaegymstl, s nem tudhatta, hogy ppen mikor fog megtrtnni ez azinterakci s mgis megtrtnt.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: Sending an intention that Iam better, sending informationwith belief that I am better, is sending information to the body to correct

itself, because as we say, a thought is an actual, physical energy, too. And

it, it sends information to the body, as well.

Ha egy olyan szndkot fejezek ki, hogy jobban vagyok, ha egy hittelmegerstet zenetet kldk, mely szerint jobban vagyok, akkor ez gy hat,

mintha azt zennm a testemnek, hogy javtsa meg magt. Hiszen minttudjuk, a gondolat valdi, fizikai energia, amely informcit kld atestnek.

EDGAR MITCHELL: It's been very well demonstrated that our belief system

affects how we behave and how we perform. And it also affects our

lifestyle. So if we don't believe that we can help ourselves, we probablycannot. If we don't believe that positive information is useful to our health

and wellbeing, then it probably won't be.

Mr tbbzben bebizonytottk, hogy hitrendszernk befolysolja hogyanviselkednk s hogyan mkdnk. Mitbb a hit befolysolja letmdunkatis. Teht ha nem hisznk abban, hogy segthetnk magunkon, akkorvalsznleg nem is tudunk. Ha nem hisznk abban, hogy a pozitvinformci jl hat az egszsgnkre, akkor valsznleg nem is hat.

ARIELLE ESSEX: Our thoughts create our body moment by moment. When we think

positive thoughts, we release certain chemicals into our body. When we

think negative thoughts, we release negative chemicals into our body.

And those have a profound effect on how the cells are behaving and howthe nutrition is being used. It's very obvious to me, working as an

osteopath, that the stress that people hold in their body has various

patterns, according to how they're thinking.

A gondolataink hozzk ltre a testnket, pillanatrl-pillanatra. Amikor pozitvan gondolkozunk, bizonyos vegyletek radnak szt a testnkben. Amikornegatvan gondolkodunk, akkor negatv vegyletek ramolnak szt. sezeknek dnt szerepe van abban, hogy a sejtjeink hogyan viselkednek shogyan hasznljk fel a tpllkot. Csontkovcsknt nagyon egyrtelm szmomra, hogy az emberek testben troldott stressz klnbz

12


13/54

mintzatokat vesz fel, annak megfelelen, hogy az adott szemly hogyangondolkozik.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: Probably the most essential aspect of healing is to, to

believe in the modality you're using, and to stay positive in some way.

There's so much evidence about belief in a system of medicine, beingcrucial to the effectiveness of that. I used to say to people, who have

cancer, after researching the limitations of things like chemotherapy,

"Don't have chemotherapy, it only works nine percent of the time." I don'tdo that anymore. And the reason I don't is that I believe that belief itself is

the body's strongest medicine. And if you believe something is going to

work, regardless of what that is, it's going to work for you. There was a

study in Houston of some patients going through a knee operation forarthritis. Half actually went through an operation where they were worked

on for their arthritis. The other half were given a sham operation, where

they just opened the knee and then closed it and did nothing. They found

over three years of follow up that both sets of patients reported having nopain. So the patients where nothing was done to them, still reported being

pain free, their arthritis was gone. There've been other studies looking atif there's any difference between going to the gym and thinking about

going to the gym. And with this study, they took a group of people and

they sent half to the gym to work on their biceps, and the other half were

allowed to sit in their armchairs and just think about going to the gym andworking on their biceps. And they still reported a very strong effect in the

group who had just sat in their armchairs. The couch potatoes still built up

their biceps. So the body really can't distinguish between, you know,action and thought. And you see this most clearly with the placebo effect.

A gygyts leglnyegesebb rsze valsznleg az, hogy higgynk az alkalmazottmdszerben s hogy valamilyen mdon pozitvak maradjunk. Rengetegbizonytk ltezik arra nzve, hogy egy adott gygyszati rendszerbe vetetthit dnt mdon befolysolja annak hatkonysgt.

Miutn kutatsokat vgeztem az olyan mdszerek, mint a kemoterpia hatsravonatkozan, rgebben gyakran mondogattam olyanokat rkosbetegeknek, hogy: Ne vegyl ignybe kemoterpit, hiszen az esetekcsupn kilen szzalkban hatsos.Ma mr nem tennk ilyet. s azrtnem, mert felismertem, hogy a hit a test legersebb orvossga. Ha hiszelabban, hogy valami mkdni fog fggetlenl attl, hogy mi is az szmodra mkdni fog.

Egy vizsglatot vgeztek Houstonban olyan pcienseknl, akik izleti gyulladsmiatt trd mtten estek t. Az egyik felknl valban megoperltk azizleti gyulladst, a msik felknl azonban csak sznlelt mttet vgeztek,ahol csupn felnyitottk a trdet majd visszazrtk, anlkl hogybrmilyen beavatkozst vgeztek volna. A hrom ves kvetsi idszak

13


14/54

alatt mindkt betegcsoport arrl szmolt be, hogy nincsenek fjdalmai.Azok a pciensek is, akiken semmilyen beavatkozst nem vgeztek, szintnarrl szmoltak be, hogy a fjdalom elmlt s az artritiszk eltnt.

Folytattak olyan vizsglatokat is, ahol azt vizsgltk, van-e klnbsg a kztt,

hogy lejrunk az edzterembe vagy csak gondolunk r. Ezen vizsglat sorn egy csoport felt elkldtk az edzterembe, hogy dolgozzanak abicepszkn, a msik felknek pedig megengedtk, hogy a fotelben lvecsupn arra gondoljanak, hogy az edzterembe mennek s a karizmukaterstik. Mgis megfigyelhet eredmnyrl szmoltak be azon csoportesetben, akik csupn a karosszkben ldgltek. A fotel bajnokok isbicepszet ptettek.

Teht valjban a test nem tud valdi klnbsget tenni gondolat s tett kztt.Ez legnylvnvalbb mdon a placebo hatsban figyelhet meg.

NARRATOR: Traditional Western medicine typically attributes spontaneous ormiraculous healing to placebo. But what exactly is the placebo effect?

A hagyomnyos nyugati orvosls a placebo-nak egy sor spontn vagy csodlatosgygyulst tulajdont. De mi is pontosan a placebo hats?

BRUCE LIPTON: The placebo effect is the fact that a belief that a person has can

override their biology. Well, it's so profoundly important that science has

recognized that at least one third of all healings, including drugs andsurgery and other allopathic interventions, one third of all healings has

nothing to do with the process, but has to do with the placebo effect. That

a person believes that the process is going to heal them, and healsthemselves in spite of the fact that maybe the pill was a sugar pill, or the

operation was just a sham and wasn't real. And why this becomes

important is, is clearly one third of all healings occurs without anybodydoing anything other than having a positive thought. And what interests

me as a biologist, and former professor in a medical school is, how we can

talk about the placebo effect for about 15 minutes in a pharmacology

course, and then totally ignore the relevance of thought and mentalprocesses on biology for the rest of medical education. So that our doctors

are not really using the placebo effect effectively; that we're not even

studying the placebo effect. And right now we could cut the healthcarecosts by exactly one third, by just using the placebo effect.

A placebo hats az a tny, hogy egy ember hite fell tudja rni sajtbiolgijt. Ez annyira fontos felfedezs, hogy a tudomny kezdifelismerni, hogy a gygyulsok legalbb egyharmadnak belertve agygyszereket, a mtteket s ms alloptis beavatkozsokat is semmikze nincs maghoz az eljrshoz, csupn a placebo hatshoz. Ahhoz,

14


15/54

hogy ha valaki hiszi, hogy az eljrs meg fogja gygytani, akkor ismeggygyul, ha csupn cukorkt kapott gygyszer helyett, vagy a mttcsupn sznlelt volt (s nem valdi).

Ez azrt vlik fontoss, hiszen a gygyulsok legalbb egyharmadaanlkl kvetkezik be, hogy brki brmit is tenne, azon kvl hogypozitvan gondolkodna. Mint biolgust s nhai egyetemi orvosprofesszortaz izgat, hogy hogyan lehetsges, hogy a gygyszerszeti kurzusokoncsupn 15 percet beszlnk a placebo hatsrl, majd az orvositanulmnyok htralev rszben teljesen figyelmen kvl hagyjuk agondolatok s a tudati folyamatok jelentsgt s biolgira kifejtetthatst. Teht az, hogy az orvosaink nem hasznljk elg hatkonyan aplacebo hatst azrt van, mert nem is tanulmnyozzk a placebo hatst. Pedig ppen most cskkenthetnnk egyharmaddal az egszsggyikiadsokat, ha alkalmaznnk a placebo hatst.

MARILYN SCHLITZ: It seems time that we began to shift the lens, and start really

focusing on what is the nature of the placebo? How is it that you can takean inert substance, something that has no known medicinal capacity, you

know, potential, and that inert substance not only can create physiological

changes in the body, but actually somehow is able to manage a whole

cascade of responses within a very complex system, such that it can targetthe liver, or the kidney, or the lungs. You know, that is a great mystery,

and we don't understand that. And much more needs to be done.

gy tnik, hogy itt az ideje, hogy figyelmnket a placebo hats termszetreirnytsuk. Hogyan lehetsges, hogy vesznk egy semleges anyagot, valami olyat, ami nem rendelkezik ismert gygyt hatssal vagypotencillal s ez a semleges anyag, nemcsak hogy fizikai vltozsokatidz el a testnkben, hanem valamilyen mdon kpes vlaszok egszsorozatt elidzni egy olyan sszetett rendszerben, mint pldul a mj, avese vagy a td. Ez egy risi misztrium, amit mg nem rtnk. s ezena tren mg nagyon sok a tennival.

DIETMAR CIMBAL (in translation): I would say that what medicine calls theplacebo effect is, by all means, an effect that is created through energy

fields. As we often say, one has to believe in it, then it will work. That is

correct, yet we don't think about how we actually do that every day. If, forexample, we wanted to watch RTL, a German TV station, then we press

the RTL button, which means that we go into alignment with the

frequency where RTL can be received. RTL is always present, but if wedon't focus on it, then we won't receive it. So, when I want to watch RTL,

I have to focus on it, I have to engage in it. And here, it is the same.

When I focus on something with my mind, the information follows this

attention.

15


16/54

(fordtsban) : gy fogalmaznk, hogy az amit az orvostudomny placebohatsknt r le, egy olyan hats, amit energia mezk idznek el. Gyakrangy fogalmazunk, hogy az embernek hinnie kell benne, aztn fog mkdni.Ez helyesnek tnik, noha nem gondolunk bele, hogyan is tesszk ezt nap

mint nap. Pldul ha a nmet TV llomst, az RTL-t akarjuk nzni, akkoraz RTL gombot nyomjuk meg, ami azt jelenti, hogy rhangoldunk arra afrekvencira, ahol az RTL-t lehet fogni. Az RTL mindig jelen van, de hanem hangoldunk r, nem tudjuk venni. Teht ha az RTL-t akarom nzni,r kell hangoldnom, r kell fkuszlnom. Ebben az esetben is ugyanarrlvan sz. Ha valamire fkuszlok az elmmmel, az informci ezt afigyelmet fogja kvetni.

RUPERT SHELDRAKE: The placebo effect is really another way of talking about

the body's self-healing capacity. And anything that unleashes more of that

is going to be a better system.

A placebo hats valjban a test ngygyt kpessgnek egy msmegkzeltse. s brmilyen mdszer, ami felszabadtja ezt a kpessget,egy jobb rendszert fog ltrehozni.

ARIELLE ESSEX: I was absolutely desperate to have children. It was one of the

reasons why I'd gotten divorced. I wanted children, my husband didn't. SoI moved to London thinking it would take me a maximum of two years to

find myself a new partner and settle down. And I'd be out in the country

having my 2.5 children and I'd be totally happy. That was my plan. I wasvery good at making plans. So, there I was, I had my osteopathic practice,

I was seeing clients. And I was stressed, frustrated, depressed. And I had

been having headaches for years, so maybe ten years I'd been having theseterrible headaches, which were getting worse and worse and worse.

Sometimes they lasted as long as five days. I had a routine visit with my

doctor and the doctor found that my hormone level was very much out ofbalance and immediately suspected that I had a tumor. So, I was sent for a

brain scan and they diagnosed a prolactinoma. It was a huge shock, huge

shock, out of the blue, and I felt at first "How unfair." I went off to the

medical library and started to learn everything I could about this tumor.And when I discovered that it caused infertility, I, I thought, "That is so

ironic." Every cell in my body was saying, "I want children," and I had

somehow created a tumor that stopped me having children. There had tobe some reason for this. There had to be, you know, this was too much of

a coincidence, I thought. And I got very curious. Because of my

alternative medicine background, I decided to treat it alternatively ratherthan go for the orthodox drugs or surgery.

Teljesen elsznt voltam, hogy gyerekem lehessen. Ez volt egyike azoknak azokoknak, amirt elvltam. n gyereket akartam, a frjem viszont nem.

16


17/54

Londonba kltztem azt gondolvn, hogy maximum kt ven bell jpartnert tallok magamnak s letelepszem. s majd kikltzm vidkre a2,5 gyerekemmel s teljesen boldog leszek. Ez volt a tervem. Mindig isnagyon j voltam tervek ksztsben. Szval ott voltam volt egycsontkovcs praxisom, ahol ellttam a betegeimet. s stresszes voltam,

frusztrlt s depresszis. s vek ta fejfjs gytrt, vagy tz verettenetes fejfjssal kszkdtem ami egyre rosszab s rosszabb lett.Nha t napig is eltartott.

Rutin vizsglatra mentem az orvosomhoz, aki felfedezte, hogy a hormonszintemnagyon kibillent az egyenslybl s azonnal tumorra gyanakodott.Elkldtt agyvizsglatra aholis prolactinomt diagnosztizltak. Hatalmassokk volt hatalmas megrzkdtats igazi derlt gbl villmcsaps, selszr azt reztem, hogy milyen igazsgtalan.

Elmentem a knyvtrba s tanulmnyozni kezdtem mindent, amit lehetett ezzel a

tumorral kapcsolatban. s amikor felfedeztem, hogy termketlensget tudokozni, arra gondoltam: ez olyan irnikus. A testem minden sejtje aztmondta, gyereket akarok, s mgis valahogyan egy olyan tumortnvesztettem, ami meggtolja, hogy gyerekem lehessen. Kell hogy ennekvalami oka legyen. Valami kell hogy legyen, hiszen tl sok az egybeess gondoltam. Szval nagyon kivncsi lettem. Az alternatv gygytsihtterem miatt elhatroztam, hogy inkbb alternatv kezelst vlasztok,minthogy alvessem magamat az orthodox gygyszeres vagy mttikezelsnek.

NARRATOR: Ariel decided to utilize neurolinguistic programming or NLP to approach

her tumor.

Ariel elhatrozta, hogy neurolingvisztikus programmozst, az NLP-t vlasztjatumorjnak kezelshez.

ARIELLE ESSEX: So then I got into doing NLP at a much deeper level. Got through

the master practitioner level, came home, and was totally inspired as to

what I could actually do. I started to really understand what NLP was all

about.

gy aztn sokkal mlyebb szintre stam bele magam az NLP-be. Tljutottam amester fokozaton, hazajttem, s nagyon lelkes voltam, hogy miket istudok tenni. Elkezdtem valjban megrteni, mirl is szl az NLP.

NARRATOR: NLP is practical form of psychology, which starts from where you arenow, and looks at where you want to be, and uncovers what's in the way.

17


18/54

Az NLP a pszicholgia gyakorlati formja, ami onnan indul ki, hogy hol is tartaszmost s megnzi, hogy hov is akarsz eljutni, majd feltrja, hogy miakadlyozza az odajutst.

ARIELLE ESSEX: If you have like my five-day headaches, you know, and you'd like

to be without a tumor in your end state, the journey to get from square oneto the end square is, you know, what we actually start exploring with NLP.

Ha t napig tart fejfjsod van mint nekem, s a vgcl az, hogy ne legyendaganatod, akkor az t a start kocktl a cl kockig vezet. Ez az amitelkezdnk felfedezni az NLP segtsgvel.

NARRATOR: Arielle made some very interesting discoveries as she began working withNLP.

Amint elkezdett az NLP-vel dolgozni, Arielle nhny nagyon rdekes felfedezst

tett.ARIELLEESSEX: Now, remember, I was the person who thought every cell in her

body wanted children. And what I discovered was that deep down, going

back to early, early, early childhood, I had such an abhorrence of what my

family had been like, that the last thing in the world part of me wanted was

to, to be a mother. And this really, really shocked me. I, I'd thought Iwanted one thing, and in fact an unconscious part of me was going in a

completely different direction. And when I understood the reasons why it

didn't want children, and what it was based on, I was able to kind of let goof that, and, and allow it to be the way it was and at least understand why

I'd created a life that didn't go down that path.

Emlkezznk r, hogy n voltam az az ember, aki testnek minden porcikjvalazt gondolta, hogy gyereket akar. Pedig valjban azt fedeztem fel,mlyen elrejtve a nagyon-nagyon korai gyerekkori emlkek kztt, hogyolyan iszonyatot reztem az akkori csaldom irnt, hogy a vilgon alegutols dolog amit kvnok, hogy anya legyek. s ez a felfedezsnaygon-nagyon megrzott. Azt gondoltam, hogy egy bizonyos dolgotakarok, pedig valjban a tudatalatti rszem pp az ellenkez irnybatartott. s amikor megrtettem az okokat, hogy mirt is nem akarokgyerekeket s hogy ez a vgy min is alapult, kpess vltam arra, hogyelengedjem s hagyjam a maga tjn haladni. s legalbb megrtettem,hogy mirt alaktottam az letemet olyann, amely nem ezen az ton haladtovbb.

One day I heard myself shouting inside my head, it's like this little voice

saying, "I'm so sick of this, I just want to be rid of this whole nightmare. I

want to be rid of this tumor." And I stopped in shock as I listened to this

voice inside my head, and I went, "Wow, there's a lot of anger in there, a

18


19/54

lot of frustration. That's a lot of self attack." If I'm attacking my tumor

with all those thoughts of wanting to get rid of it, that's murderous. That

can't be healing. And I had never looked at healing in that way. And Irealized then that every thought I'd had was actually about making it go

away.

Egy napon hallottam magamat, ahogy a fejemben kiablok. Mintha egykis hang azt mondan: Olyan elegem van ebbl az egszbl, csak megakarok szabadulni ettl az egsz rmlomtl! Meg akarok szabadulni ettla tumortl! Teljesen megbnultam a dbbenettl, ahogyan ezt a belshangot hallgattam, s azt gondoltam magamban: Hha! Rengeteg haragvan itt, rengeteg frusztrci. Rengeteg nostorozs. Ha a tumoromatmindezekkel a gondolatokkal tmadom meg s gy akarok megszabadulnitle, akkor ez hallos. Ez nem lehet gygyts. Pedig mg soha nemgondoltam gy a gygytsra. Felismertem, hogy minden gondolatommalazon voltam, hogy tvozsra ksztessem.

Now, that's a conflict, that's a huge inner conflict and I decided to look at

that a little bit more closely. And I thought, "Well, what would be theopposite? It has to be acceptance." I thought to myself, "Well, what

would it be like if I really accepted this tumor?" And this is quite a few

years later that it was, it was absolutely a, a turning point in my healing,

when I realized that my tumor had taken me down a journey I'd never planned. It had taught me things I had never intended to learn. I had

changed my career, I had changed my whole outlook, I had learned lots of

things about myself and others. I had insights I'd never had before. I'dmet amazing people, wonderful people, all over the world. I had the

support of people all over the world. And I realize I liked myself a lot

better. And so I thought, "Okay, I can see that this tumor hasn't beentotally bad." So what if it has a purpose or a reason for being here?

'Cause obviously it's done a good job so far. So if it's got a purpose for

being here, and it's still here, maybe there's still a purpose.

Ez pedig egy konfliktus egy hatalmas bels konflikus ezrtelhatroztam, hogy egy kicsit kzelebbrl megvizsglom a dolgot. Azt gondoltam: Mi lenne az ellenkezje? Bizonyra az elfogads. Aztgondoltam magamban: Mi lenne, ha valban elfogadnm ezt a tumort?s ez j nhny vvel ksbb volt, pedig abszolt ez volt a fordulpont agygyulsomban, amikor felismertem, hogy a daganatom egy olyan traterelt, amit sohasem terveztem. Olyan dolgokat tantott meg nekem, amiketsoha nem llt szndkomban megtanulni. Megvltoztattam a karriremet,megvltoztattam a kinzetemet, rengeteg dolgot tanultam magamrl smsokrl. Olyan beltst nyertem, amellyel azeltt soha nemrendelkeztem. Elbvl embereket csodlatos embereket ismertem mega vilg minden tjrl. A vilg minden tjrl tmogattak az emberek.Aztn felismertem, hogy sokkal jobban szeretem sajt magamat. gy vgl

19


20/54

azt gondoltam: Ok, beltom, hogy ez a tumor nem csupn a rosszrl szl. Mi van akkor, ha oka van annak, hogy itt van? Hiszennylvnvalan j munkt vgzett mindezidig. Szval ha oka van azittltnek s mg mindig itt van, akkor mg mindig van oka.

What would happen if I gave it permission to stay for the rest of my life?It was six months after I had that realization, and I got to the point of

accepting the presence of my tumor. I had my routine blood test, and I

went to see my specialist. And to my surprise, my hormone levels werecompletely normal. And when my doctor saw them, he just went, "Wow,

that's incredible." And you know, I thought it'd been a mistake, I thought

maybe the blood test reading was wrong or something. I said, "Well, you

know, so much time has passed, and I'm older now, maybe my hormoneshave changed." He said, "No, no, no, no, no, can't be that." He said, "This

can only mean one thing: your tumor has gone." And he said, "This is a

real credit to you. I don't know how you've done it, I don't know what

you've been doing but I have to tell you, I've seen you for ten years andyou're not the same person you were ten years ago. You are completely

different."

Mi trtnne, ha megengednm neki, hogy letem vgig maradjon? Hathnap telt el azta, hogy ezt felismertem s eljutottam addig a pontig,hogy elfogadtam a tumorom jelenltt. A szoksos vrvizsglatom utn felkerestem a szakorvosomat. Meglepetsemre a hormonszintem teljesennormlis volt. Amikor az orvosom ltta az eredmnyeket azt mondta:Naht, ez hihetetlen! Azt gondoltam, biztosan hiba trtnt, taln rossz avrteszt vagy valami hasonl. Azt modtam neki: Bizonyra annyi id teltel, idsebb is vagyok mr, taln megvltoztak a hormonjaim. azt felelte Nem, nem, nem, az nem lehet. Ez csak azt jelentheti, hogy atumor eltnt.s hozztette: Fogadja legmlyebb elismersemet! Nemtudom hogyan csinlta, de el kell mondanom, hogy tz ve ltom magt, demr nem az a szemly, aki tz vvel ezeltt volt. Teljesen megvltozott.

HOWARD MARTIN: When we make an emotional shift, let's say we go from

frustration to joy, those kind of emotional shifts, about 1400 biochemical

changes instantly go off in the body. Now if you think about the course ofone day, all the emotions that we feel, the highs and the lows, and you

know, the myriad of emotional textures that occur through our

perceptions, now during a day, you can see that emotions are creating lotsand lots of changes in our physiology. So it makes a lot of sense to start

paying attention to the emotional diet, as well as to the physical diet.

That's one of the keys to better health, and certainly to slowing down theaging process. Strong negative emotions just degenerate us, positive

emotional states regenerate us; becomes simple math. Feel more love,

more care, more appreciation, and your health's got a better chance of

improving and staying that way.

20


21/54

Ha bekvetkezik egy rzelmi vltozs, mondjuk a frusztrcitl eljutunk azrmig akkor egy ilyen fajta rzelmi vltozs krlbell 1400 biokmiaivltozst indt el a testnkben azonnal. Ha vgiggondoljuk, hogy milyensok rzelmet lnk t egy nap leforgsa alatt, a cscs- s mlypontokat,

azt a szmtalan rzelmi hatst melynek ki vagyunk tve az szlelsnkltal, akkor lthatjuk hogy az rzelmek rengeteg vltozst okoznak afiziolginkban. Belthatjuk, hogy a fizikai dithoz hasonlan rdemesodafigyelnnk az rzelmi ditra is. Ez az egszsgesebb let egyik kulcsa,amely minden ktsget kizrlag lelasstja az regedsi folyamatot. Ersnegatv rzelmek degenerlnak bennnket, pozitv rzelmi llapotokregenerlnak bennnket egyszer mint a matematika. rezz tbb szeretetet, tbb trdst, tbb hlt s valszn, hogy az egszsgedjavulni fog s gy is marad.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: One of the most profound discoveries made really since the

advent of quantum physics, is a thing called the zero point field. Andwhat this is, is the energy exchange that goes on between subatomic

particles. All subatomic particles engage in a little energy dance. It'salmost like a, playing a game of basketball. They send energy back and

forth to each other. And in that exchange, a thing called a virtual particle

is created, just for less than the blink of an eye. Now, that little individual

exchange isn't much energy, it's about a half a watt's worth. But when youmultiply all of the subatomic particles doing this energy exchange across

all things in all the universe, you come up with this unfathomable amount

of energy, all happening out there in empty space, like some superchargedbackdrop.

A kvantum fizika megjelense ta az egyik legfontosabb felfedezs az gynevezettzro-pont mez. s hogy mi is ez? Ez az energia csere, amely a szubatomirszecskk kztt megy vgbe. Valamennyi szubatomi rszecskebekapcsoldik egy kis energia tncba. Majdnem olyan ez, minthakosrlabda jtkot jtszannk. Energit kldenek oda-vissza egymsnak.s ebben a cserben egy szempillantsra ltrejn egy dolog, amit virtulisrszecsknek neveznek. Mrmost ez az egyedi kis csere nem sok energitjelent, krlbell fl Watt nagysg. De ha ezt megszorozzuk azzal, hogyvalamennyi szubatomi rszecske ezt az energia csert vgzi minden egyesdologban a teljes univerzumban, akkor mrhetetlen energia mennyisghez jutunk mindez folyamatosan trtnik az res trben, mint valamitltlttt httrtrolban.

BRUCE LIPTON: While conventional biology focuses on the material stimuli,quantum physics reveal that it's the invisible stimuli that are much more

important. There's a simple quote by Albert Einstein that makes sense out

of this, and the quote is, "The field is the sole governing agency of the

particle." What Einstein meant by this very simple is the field, the

21


22/54

invisible energy forces around us, they are the sole governing agencies of

the particle, well the particle's matter. And so quantum physics says, "The

character of matter is ultimately determined by the field."

Mg a hagyomnyos biolgia az anyagban tetten rhet ingerekre fkuszl, addig

a kvantum fizika feltrja, hogy a lthatatlan ingerletek sokkal fontosabbak. Ltezik egy egyszer idzet Albert Einsteintl amelymegmagyarzza ezt: Egyedl a mez irnytja a rszecskk mkdst. Einstein egyszeren azt rtette ez alatt, hogy a mezk a minketkrlvev lthatatlan energia erterek irnytjk egyedl a rszecskket,az anyagi rszecskket. Ennek megfelelen a kvantumfizika azt lltja,hogy Az anyag jellegzetessgt vgs soron a mez hatrozza meg .

ERIC PEARL: How then is healing communicated to another person. Well, you see,

there's this field. We're not in this field, we are this field. We're denser,

we're lighter in between; we're denser, we're lighter in between. Or some

people say, "We're lighter when we're physical form, and we're denser inbetween." Whatever the aspect is, we're blips in this field, this field of

energy, of light, of information. We access this field all of the time. Wepull information from this field all the time.

Hogyan is kommuniklhat a gygyts egy msik szemllyel? Teht,adott ez a mez. Mi nem ebben a mezben vagyunk mi magunk vagyunka mez. Hol srbbek, hol ritkbbak vagyunk benne; hol srbbek, holritkbbak vagyunk benne. Vagy ahogy msok mondjk: Ritkbbakvagyunk a fizikai formnkban s srbbek kztte. Brmilyenszemszgbl is nzzk, radarjelek vagyunk ebben a mezben ebben azenergia, fny s informci mezben. llandan ezzel a mezvel lpnkkapcsolatba. Minden pillanatban ebbl a mezbl nyernk ki informcit.

DIETMAR CIMBAL(in translation): Every one of us has watched a flock of birds inflight, and how it changes direction. Instantly, all birds in the flock

change direction. So, it seems as if a superior bird brain controls all the

birds simultaneously. That only works with the help of those fields, since

the fields are able to transfer with no informational loss, and above all,instantaneously, with no time delay.

(fordtsbl) Mindnyjan figyeltk mr meg madrsereget repls kzben s hogyhogyan vltanak irnyt. Minden madr a seregben azonnal, egyidejlegvlt irnyt. gy tnik hogy egy felsbbrend madr-agy szimultn mdonirnyt minden egyes madarat. Ez csak a mezknek a segtsgvellehetsges, mivel a mezk kpesek arra, hogy informcivesztesg nlklkzvettsenek s mindenek felett egyidejleg, id kslekeds nlkl.

22


23/54

EDGAR MITCHELL: Walk into any great cathedral in the United States, in Europe,

anywhere, that's been standing for 100 years or more, and what you will

experience is in that cathedral, is a hush of awe, reverence, quiet, and it's apalpable experience. Why is that true? It is true because for hundreds of

years the people going in to that cathedral have been on their best

behavior, they have been in awe and worshipful. And in that state of mindthat the quantum emissions from the body/brain are emitted into that

cathedral, absorbed into that cathedral, and fed back in later centuries to

the participants coming into it. And that's why they feel like there's ahush, awe, and reverence.

Menj be brmelyik nagy katedrlisba az Egyeslt llamokban, Eurpban, vagybrhol mshol, amely mr 100 ve vagy annl rgebben ll ott, s aztfogod tapasztalni ezekben a katedrlisokban, az hitat, a tisztelet, a csendkzzelfoghat lmny. s hogyan lehetsges ez? gy lehetsges, hogy azemberek vszzadokon t jrtak abba a katedrlisba, s ott a lehet

legjobb mdon viselkedtek, hitatot s hdolatot tanustottak. s ebben atudatllapotban a testi agybl kiraml kvantum kibocsjts tsugrzik akatedrlisba, bele ivdik a katedrlis falaiba s mg vszzadokkalksbb is visszasugrzik azokra akik belpnek ide. Ezrt rezzk gy, hogycsend, hitat, s tiszteletads tlti be a teret.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: We're all part of this giant energy field, this zero pointfield, that we're all connected, and that we're connected across the furthest

reaches of the cosmos.

Mi valamennyien rszei vagyunk ennek az risi energia meznek, ennek a zrpont meznek, amelyben ssze vagyunk kapcsoldva s ssze vagyunkkapcsolva a kozmosz legtvolabbi rszvel is.

JAMES OSCHMAN: Watch an ice skater. There are things that they can do that are not

describable, in terms of nerve impulses. Nerve impulses and chemicalreactions are two slow to explain the subtleties of life.

Figyelj meg egy korcsolyzt. Olyan dolgokat tudnak mecsinlni, amiket nemlehet az idegrendszeri mkdssel megmagyarzni. Az idegi impulzusoks kmiai reakcik tl lassak ahhoz, hogy megmagyarzzk az letfinomsgait.

PETER FRASER: Even now, if you look up the textbooks in psychology, in

medicine, or biology, and try to find out how the nervous system works,

you're confronted with the discontinuity of the system.

Mg ma is, ha belenznk a pszicholgiai, orvosi, vagy biolgiai tanknyvekbe sprbljuk megtudni, hogyan mkdik az idegrendszer, szembe talljukmagunkat a rendszer kvetkezetlensgvel.

23


24/54

NARRATOR: A nervous system is comprised of neuron cells that carry electrical and

chemical impulses throughout the body.

Az idegrendszer neuron sejtekbl pl fel, melyek elektromos s kmiai

impulzusokat kzvettenek az egsz testbe.PETER FRASER: If you measure the impulses of the nervous system, we get some of

them going at 200 miles an hour, whereas other of them going at twomiles an hour. And I think those are the pain reflexes are very slow. How

on earth the brain or any other part of the body can coordinate the nervous

system and, and your very fine movements, when these impulses are

supposed to be traveling at many different speeds, is just an impossibleproblem.

Ha megmrjk az idegrendszer impulzusait, azt talljuk hogy nmelyikk 125

km/rval szguld, mg msok csupn msfl kilomtert tesz meg egy raalatt. Azt hiszem, a fjdalom reflexek azok, amelyek nagyon lassak. Hogyaz rdgben tudja az agy, vagy a testnek ms rsze koordinlni azidegrendszert s a nagyon finom mozgsokat, amikor ezek az impulzusoklltlag klnbz sebessggel kzlekednek ez egy megoldhatatlanproblma.

If you're a dancer, for example, we're moving in three dimensions, and

you're moving in time. How on earth that person can coordinate all of

these important dance steps is quite a mystery. This seems to beimpossible with the contemporary model of the nervous system. We need

a field theory to explain how the nervous system in all its complexity can

coordinate everything that happens in the body

Ha tncos vagy, akkor pldul hrom dimenziban mozogsz s idbenmozogsz egyszerre. Hogy hogyan lehet koordinlni mindezeket a fontostnclpseket egyszerre, az mr szinte titokzatos. Az idegrendszerjelenlegi modellje szerint ez lehetetlennek tnik. Szksgnk van egy mezelmletre hogy megmagyarzzuk, hogy az idegrendszer a maga teljeskomplexitsban hogyan is koordinl mindent, ami egyszerre trtnik atestben.

BRUCE LIPTON: We now know, when you study nervous system activity, that thebrain can start firing synchronous pulses throughout different areas of the

brain, virtually instantaneously. The significance of the coherence of

these pulses that begin to fire when actually consciousness is functioning,is when scientists looked at how fast you could coordinate all these

different areas that were focusing at the same time, that the coherence of

the firing was faster than the physical ability of cells to communicate from

one area to the other. So basically, these results reveal that the brain is

24


25/54

communicating on a higher level than through the physical transmission of

nerves.

Az idegrendszer aktivitst tanulmnyozva, ma mr tudjuk, hogy az agy prhuzamos impulzusokat kpes kibocsjtani az agy klnbz

terleteirl ltszlag egyidejleg. Ezen impulzusok sszehangoltsga igen fontos jelentssggel br, ugyanis amikor a tudat elkezd mkdni selkezdi kilni ezeket az ingerleteket, a tudsok megvizsgltk hogymilyen gyorsan tudjuk koordinlni azokat a klnbz terleteket,melyekre egyszerre fkuszlunk, s gy talltk, hogy az sszehangoltimpulzuskibocsjts gyorsabban trtnik, minthogy azt a sejtek fizikaikommunikcis kpessge lehetv tenn. Teht az eredmnyekalapveten azt bizonytjk, hogy az agy magasabb szinten kommunikl,mint az idegek fizikai ingerlettviteli szintje.

ERIC PEARL: Our brains also don't work the way we were taught in school. Learning

isn't there, memory isn't here, speech isn't here, this isn't there, this isn'tsomewhere else. These aspects are diffuse throughout our brains, and we

access it from the field. So it's as if there's this bandwidth of informationthat we're always in tune with, although not always consciously.

Agyunk egyltaln nem gy mkdik, mint ahogyan azt az iskolban tanultuk. Atanuls nem egy helyen trtnik, a memria nem egy helyen troldik, abeszd nem egy helyen kpzdik, ezek nem itt s nem is ott vannak. Ezekaz aspektusok az egsz agyunkban sztszrdva lteznek s a meznkeresztl frnk hozzjuk. Szval gy tnik, hogy ltezik egy informcihullmhossz amelyre mindig r vagyunk hangolva, br nem mindigtudatosan.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: We're understanding that the brain doesn't have precise

addresses for certain things. No one's been able to find where memory is,

for instance. And Carl Privrem [phonetic] did some amazing studies yearsago, horrible studies, where they taught rats certain runs, and then began

systematically destroying the rats' brains. And they found that no matter

how much of the brain they removed, the rats might have terrible motor

skills from that. But they would still, over and over, remember the run.And from that Privrem understood that you couldn't say that memory has

one precise address, that it's much more delocalized. And in fact, most

radically, that memory might not exist inside the skull at all, but maybesomewhere out here in the field. And so, what you have instead of this

localized, centralized system, is much more of a paradigm where the body

is an interaction, it's not something that ends here, it's something that endsout here. And that we have an interaction taking place between us and our

environment, us and the field at every moment.

25


26/54


27/54

after that, where the total healing period had been less than six months,

and again had a sonogram, and it was totally gone. Everything was

regular again. Nearly all of the healings that I have worked with, had beenremote or at a distance. And it didn't seem to make--the distance, it seems,

have no effect at all, which would again suggest we're dealing with a

quantum phenomenon.

Egy hnappal a diagnzis fellltsa utn visszamentem egy szonogrfira. Arntgenorvos megvizsglta az adatokat s azt mondta, hogy brmit iscsinl, folytassa csak, mivel a vese eltrs kisebb s eltnben van. Ezutn hrom hnap mlva mentem vissza ismt, 2003 vge fel tudniillik a gygyulsi idszak hat hnapnl is kevesebb volt smegismteltk a szonogrfit s ekkorra mr teljesen eltnt. Minden ismtrendesen mkdtt. Szinte minden gygyts, amivel tallkoztam, tvolrlvagy tttelesen trtnt. gy tnik, a tvolsgnak egyltaln nincs hatsa,ami megintcsak arra enged kvetkeztetni, hogy egy kvantum jelensggel

llunk szembe.The healer was in Vancouver, British Columbia; I was in Florida, thelongest distance across the United States. And so I continued then to

experiment with different healing modes, for different things with

different people. But the mechanism is always the same: there's

information being transferred, and there seems to be an energy transfer, aswell, that's palpable.

A gygyt Vancouverben tartzkodott, Brit Kolumbiban; n Floridbanvoltam ez a leghosszabb tvolsg az Egyeslt llamokban. Folytattam aksrletezst a klnbz gygymdokkal, klnbz esetekkel sklnbz emberekkel. De a mechanizmus mindig ugyanaz: van egykibocsjtott informci, s gy tnik, van egy rzkelhet energiatvitel.

NARRATOR: It now appears that our bodies are connected to the field, but what is themechanism for this intercommunication?

How can this connection take place? One possible solution: the

biophoton. Biophotons are weak emissions of light emanating from thecells of all living things.

gy tnik, a testnk hozz van kapcsoldva a mezhz, de mi amechanizmusa ennek az interkommunikcinak?

Hogy zajlik le ez a kommunikci? Egy lehetsges megolds: a biofoton. A biofotonok gyenge fnyemisszik (fnykibocsjtsok), melyeket azllnyek sejtjei sugroznak ki.

27


28/54

LYNNE MCTAGGART: We know we're sending out information with biophoton

emissions because people like Fritz Popp have discovered that we are

sending out tiny currents of light.

Tudjuk, hogy biofotonok kibocstsa rvn informcit sugrzunk szt. Hiszen

mr felfedeztk, pldul Fritz Popp is hogy egszen kis fny ramokatsugrozunk szt.

FRITZ POPP: We started to look for these photons. I knew from the beginningon that it must not be very high intensity, but it was clear that one should

have these photons at all inner cells.

Elkezdtk keresni ezeket a fotonokat. Kezdettl fogva tudtam, hogy nem lehet tlnagy intenzitsuk, de vilgos volt, hogy minden bels sejtben jelen kelllennik.

NARRATOR: In order to detect the biophotons, Professor Popp and his students neededa photonmultiplier that was so sensitive it could see a candle over twelve

miles away. When a living organism is placed in front of the photondetector, light emitting from the cells can be observed.

Azrt hogy biofotonokat tudjanak detektlni, Popp professzonak stantvnyainak egy olyan fotonsokszorostra volt szksge, amely olyanrzkeny, hogy 12 mrfld tvolsgrl is rzkeli a gyertylngot. Ha egyllnyt helyeznk a fotondetektor el, akkor megfigyelhet, hogy a sejtekfny bocsjtanak ki.

FRITZ POPP: We started with cucumber seedlings and later with other ones.

And all living systems which we put in those instrument showed this veryweak photon emission.

Uborka magocskkkal kezdtnk majd ksbb msmilyenekkel. Minden lrendszer, amit a mszerhez tettnk, nagyon gyenge foton kibocsjtstmutatott.

NARRATOR: Professor Popp theorizes that these biophoton emissions may becontrolling our bodies metabolism.

Popp professzor elmlete szerint ezek a biofoton kibocstsok irnythatjktestnk metabolizmust.

FRITZ POPP: Molecules cannot regulate themselves, they have to have a field,more or less. So as the photons should be the carrier of the information,

which is necessary to regulate the metabolism.

28


29/54

A molekulk nem szablyozhatjk nmagukat, gy tbb-kevsb valamilyenmezvel kell rendelkeznik. Teht a fotonoknak kell informcihordozknak lennik ez szksges a metabolizmus szablyozshoz.

NARRATOR: These biophotons create a dynamic, coherent web of light within our

bodies. Our bodies are constantly emitting light in the form of biophotons.Are these biophotons the body's control mechanism? Isn't that the

function of our DNA, our genes.

Ezek a biofotonok egy dinamikus, koherens fnyhlt hoznak ltre a testnknbell s a testeink folyamatosan fnyt bocsjtanak ki biofotonok formjban. Vajon ezek a biofotonok jelentik testnk ellenrzmechanizmust ? Nem a DNS-nk, nem a gnjeink irnytjk ezt afunkcit?

BRUCE LIPTON: Genes are not controlling our biology.

Nem a gnek irnytjk a biolginkat.

When we get issues running in families, for example, cancer, we

immediately look at a genealogy chart and mark all the recipients of this

cancer running through the family, and then turn around and say, "Look,

genetics, this is running in the family so there must be cancer genes."What they've left out of this very interesting piece of research that reveals

that when children are adopted into families that have cancer, the adopted

children will express the cancer with the same propensity as any naturalchild in that family; but the interesting fact is, the child comes from totally

different genetics that doesn't even have that cancer. So, it says being

introduced into the family dynamics, which is where you learn perceptionsand beliefs and attitudes, is what shapes the cancer, not the genetic that

somebody came in with.

Ha olyan csaldi problmkkal tallkozunk, mint pldul a rk, rgtn agntrkpet kezdjk vizsglni s megjelljk azokat a csaldtagokat, akikmegkaptk a rkot, mondvn: Lssuk a genetikt, mivel ez vgigvonul acsaldon, kell lennie rk gnnek. Amit kihagytak ebbl a nagyon rdekeskutatsbl, hogy amikor gyerekeket fogadnak rkbe olyan csaldokba,ahol rkbetegek vannak, az adoptlt gyereknl ugyanolyan mrtkbenalakulhat ki rk, mint a csald sajt gyerekeinl. Az rdekessg az, hogyaz rkbefogadott gyerek olyan genetikval rendelkezik, amelyben bennesincs ez a rk. Ez arra vilgt r, hogy az befolysolja a rk kialakulst,hogy milyen csaldinamikval kerlnk kapcsolatba, milyen rzkelst,hitrendszert s hozzllst tanulunk meg nem pedig az, hogy milyengenetikai httrrel rendelkeznk.

29


30/54

NARRATOR: There is a new branch of genetics known as epigenetics, that addresses

this environmental influence on genetic expression.

A genetiknak ltezik egy j ga, amit epigenetik-nak neveznk, amely ezzekkel,a gnfejldsre gyakorolt krnyezeti hatsokkal foglalkozik.

LYNNE MCTAGGART: Epigeneticists have discovered that the information inside

every cell, the thing that, that switches it on and turns it on, and changes

things, is not inside the cells, but outside. Signals occur outside, from theenvironment.

Az epigenetikusok felfedeztk, hogy a sejteken belli informci, ami bekapcsolja,ami mkdteti s ami megvltoztatja a dolgokat, nem is a sejteken belltallhat, hanem azokon kvl. A jelzsek kvl jelentkeznek, akrnyezetbl jnnek.

BRUCE LIPTON: A gene is blueprint, that's basically what it is, to make a proteinmolecule. And the proteins, there are over 100,000 of 'em, are the

building blocks that give us our, our biology, our structure, our behavior.Okay? So the issue is, we talk about gene blueprints, and up until the last

ten years, a blueprint was a hardwired piece of information to make a

particular protein. The new science is just mindboggling, because it

reveals that through epigenetic mechanisms, through the influence of theenvironment on reading the genes, epigenetic mechanisms can produce

over 30,000 different variations from every gene blueprint. And all the

sudden, when you start to recognize that, you realize we have potentialsthat are totally unlimited. And this is a great change from a belief that

genes were deterministic. Now genes are potentials.

A gn egy lenyomat, ami lnyegben arra szolgl, hogy fehrjt lltson el. s afehrjk, amelyekbl tbb mint 100 000 ltezik, kpezik azokat az ptelemeket, amelyekbl felpl a biolgink, szerkezetnk, viselkedsnk. rtjk? Teht ami a tmt illeti, amikor genetikai lenyomatokrlbeszlnk, egszen az elmlt tz vig, a lenyomatot tekintettk annak azinformci hordoz egysgnek, amely ltrehozza az egyes fehrjket.Azonban az j tudomny, zavarba ejt mdon, rvlgtott arra, hogy azepigenetikai mechanizmusokon keresztl azon a hatson keresztl, hogya krnyezet leolvassa a gneket az epigenetikus folyamatok tbb mint30 000 klnbz varicit tudnak ellltani ugyanabbl a lenyomatbl. s hirtelen, amint felismerjk ezt, rjvnk arra, hogy vgtelenlehetsgekkel rendelkeznk. Ez hatalmas vltozs ahhoz a nzethezkpest, hogy a gnek hatroznak meg mindent. A gnek csupnlehetsget jelentenek.

RUPERT SHELDRAKE: If you just look at the molecular level, the Human Genome

Project has revealed that we have about 25,000 genes, far fewer than they

30


31/54

originally expected. The Chimpanzee Genome Project has now sequenced

the entire chimpanzee genome, and their genome is virtually the same as

ours--they've got the same kinds of proteins, the same kind of genes, youcan hardly tell the difference. Yet, there's an obvious difference, and if

you can't explain it in terms of genes, what can you explain it in terms of?

And the answer is, I think, morphogenetic fields. Just as you can buildtwo different buildings with the same bricks and cement, if you have two

different plans, you can build different organisms with different fields,

even if the constituent molecules are very similar, as they are in humansand chimpanzees.

Ha csak a molekulris szintet vizsgljuk, az Emberi Gn Projekt feltrta,hogy krlbell 25 000 gnnel rendelkeznk, jval kevesebbel, mint aztkorbban feltteleztk. A Csimpnz Gn Projekt mostanra feldolgozta ateljes csimpnz gnllomnyt, s genetikjuk gyakorlatilag ugyanaz minta mink ugyanazok a proteinek, ugyanazok a gnek, alig lehet

megmondani a klnbsget. Mgis van egy nylvnval klnbsg, s haezt nem tudjuk a genetikval megmagyarzni, akkor mivel is tudjuk? Avlasz gy gondolom: a morfogenetikai mezk. Hasonlan ahhoz,ahogyan fel tudunk pteni kt klnbz hzat ugyanazokbl az ptanyagokbl kt klnbz terv alapjn, ugyangy felpthetnk ktklnbz organizmust kt klnbz mez alapjn, mg akkor is, ha azalkot molekulk nagyon hasonlak, amint az ember s a csimpnzesetben.

PETER FRASER: The DNA is like a library book. These are all the possibleproteins, from earthworms, right up to us. It's all the same library, but

you've got to know which book to take out of the library. This is the big

problem in genetics itself, is trying to explain how the body knows whichbook to take out of the genetic library. And we think the body field is

what decides which piece of information is taken from the DNA.

A DNS olyan mint egy knyvtr. Az sszes lehetsges fehrje gyjtemnye, a fldigiliszttl kezdve egszen mi magunkig. Ugyanabban a knyvtrban vanminden, de tudni kell, melyik knyvet vegyk ki. A genetiknak ppen ez anagy prblmja, hogy megmagyarzza, honnan is tudja a test, melyikknyvet kell kivennie a genetikai knyvtrbl. Mi gy gondoljuk, hogy atestmez az, amelyik dnt afell, melyik informcit veszi ki a DNS-bl.

NARRATOR: Many cultures of the past have explored the energetic system of the body.

Today, researchers theorize that the body does have a field of energy,

known as the morphogenic field, or the body field.

A mltban szmos kultra vizsglta a testnk energetikai rendszert. Ma atudsok gy kpzelik, hogy a testnek valban van egy energia mezje,amit morfogenetikus meznek, vagy test meznek hvnak.

31


32/54

RUPERT SHELDRAKE: There's a hierarchy of fields organizing our bodies. There's

the field of the whole body, there's the fields of the organs, and then thefields of the tissues, and then the fields of the cells within those. The

fields of our own body is within and around the body. There's an overall

field, and then there's subsidiary fields of modular fields, for arms, legs,and the different organs. The advantage of fields is that they're

intrinsically holistic. All fields are holistic. The gravitational field is, you

can't slice a bit out of it. If you cut a flatworm into ten different pieces,each part can grow into a new worm. Now how's that possible? If it was

a machine, that wouldn't happen. If you cut up a machine, all you get is a

break in the machine. But if you cut up a magnet, a field system, then

you, however many bits of little magnet you produce, each has a completemagnetic field. And it was this analogy with magnetic fields that led

developmental biologists to suggest the idea of morphogenetic fields in the

first place. And this was way back in the 1920s. And this field is now a

crucial concept in developmental biology. You can't really understandhow organisms develop without it.

Ltezik egy hierarchia a testnket szervez mezkn bell. Ltezik a teljes testmez, ltezik a szerv mez, aztn a szvet mez s aztn a sejt mezmindezeken bell. A testnk mezeje a testen bell s a testen kvl iselhelyezkedik. Ltezik egy mindent krlvev mez, aztn lteznekmsodlagos mezk, melyek tovbbi a kezekrt, lbakrt, s klnbzszervekrt felel modulris mezkbl llnak ssze. A mezk elnye az,hogy valjban holisztikusak. Minden mez holisztikus. A gravitcismezbl, sem tudsz kivgni egy kicsit. Ha egy frget tz klnbz rszrevgunk, minden rszbl kln j freg fog fejldni. Hogy is lehetsges ez?Egy gppel ez nem trtnne meg. Ha feldarabolunk egy gpet, akkor csaklerobban. De ha egy mez-rendszert, mondjuk egy mgnest darabolunk fel, akkor fggetlenl attl, hogy hny darabra vgjuk, minden darabteljes mgneses mezvel fog rendelkezni. s ez a mgneses mez analgiavezette el a fejldst kutat biolgusokat oda, hogy elrukkoljanak amorfogenetikus mezkkel. s ez mr rges-rg, az 1920-as vekbenmegtrtnt. Azta ez a mez vlt a fejldst kutat biolgia kzpontieszmjv. Enlkl nem igazn rthet, hogy az llnyek hogyanfejldnek ki.

NARRATOR: All humans begin life as a single cell, that grows and divides, developinginto the various organs and limbs of our bodies. How these cells know

what to become has baffled scientists and led to the idea of control fields

in biology.

Minden ember egyetlen sejtknt kezdi az lett, egyetlen sejtbl osztdik szt sfejldik klnbz szervekk s vgtagokk. Hogy honnan tudjk ezek a

32


33/54

sejtek, miv vljanak, zavarba ejtette a tudsokat, s ez vezetett abiolgiban a kontrol mezk elmlethez.

PETER FRASER: We've already found that there are different parts of the body field,

some of which relate to the muscles and connective tissue. Another part

of the body field that relates to the brain, and nervous system, yet anotherone for the morphic field, which connects back to the DNA and the

genetic information of your body. So it links up with medicine in many

places, so it's not different from medicine, it's just going a little bit furtherconceptually.

Mr felfedeztk, hogy a testmeznek klnbz rszei vannak, melynek egy rszeaz izmokhoz s ktszvetekhez kapcsoldik. A testmez egy msik rszeaz agyhoz s az idegrendszerhez kapcsoldik, mg egy jabb rsze amorfikus mezhz, amelyik a DNS-sel s a testnk genetikaiinformcijval ll kapcsolatban. Sok ponton kapcsoldik az orvoslshoz,

teht nem is klnbzik az orvoslstl, csak koncepcionlisan egy kicsittovbb megy.

NARRATOR: These energetic fields may provide the information necessary for

controlling the body.

Ezek az energia mezk nyjtjk a test irnytshoz szksges informcit.

PETER FRASER: How does the body know to maintain its temperature at a particular

temperature? What decides or who decides what is going to be the correctblood pressure for that person? Nobody knows, and we're saying, as a

holistic idea, the body field decides to tune, turn all the knobs.

Hogyan tudja a test egy bizonyos hmrskleten tartani a hmrsklett? Mi vagyki dnti el, hogy mi is a megfelel vrnyoms egy adott ember szmra ?Senki sem tudja. Mi a holisztikus szemlletnkkel azt lltjuk, hogy atestmez hangolja be a rendszert, az rnytja az sszes alkatrszt.

RUPERT SHELDRAKE: Morphogenetic fields, or more generally fields of

information, yes are control systems over and above the molecular level,or the biochemical level. They are systems that organize the body, they

organize the developing organism, plants have them, too, and all animals

have them. They maintain the form of the body, they help bodies torecover from disease or damage. They underlie a regeneration, for

example.

A morfogenetikus mezk, vagy ltalnosabban az informci mezk jelentik aztaz irnyt rendszert, melyek a molekulris szint s biokmiai szint felettllnak s irnytjk azt. Olyan rendszerek, melyek megszervezik a testmkdst s megszervezik egy fejld szervezet kialakulst a

33


34/54

nvnyek s az llatok is rendelkeznek ilyenekkel. Ezek tartjk fent a test formjt s ezek segtenek a testnek felplni a betegsgekbl vagysrlsekbl.

DIETMAR CIMBAL (in translation): We can go even further, and could say that

the human body actually is structured information; or in other words, thatthe human body is an energy field. An energy field of standing,

stationary, scalar waves, that are correspondingly organized, structured,

and contain a great deal of information.

Mg tovbb menve azt mondhatjuk, hogy az emberi test nem ms, mint struktrltinformci ms szavakkal szlva, az emberi test egy energiamez. Egylland skalris llhullmokbl sszetevd energiamez, amely ennekmegfelelen szervezdik s struktrldik s rengeteg informcit trol.

RUPERT SHELDRAKE: And I think that we really need a field based model of the

body, if we're ever going to be able to integrate different forms of healingor medicine, into a coherent understanding.

gy gondolom, hogy valban szksgnk van egy mezn alapul test-modellre,ha valaha kpesek lesznk integrlni a gygyts s orvosls klnbzformit egy egysges rendszerbe.

NARRATOR: The body field is an energetic field, filled with patterns of information.

All of the organs in our bodies generate their own specific fields. One

organ in particular seems to generate significant fields which affect theentire body.

A testmez egy informci-mintkkal teltett energia mez. Testnk minden szervea sajt specifikus mezjt hozza ltre. gy tnik, hogy egy bizonyos szervolyan szignifikns mezket generl, melyek az egsz testet befolysoljk.

FOLKER MEISSNER: The heart is the emperor in the system; the liver and all the

organs have other tasks, but the heart is overruling all.

A szv a rendszer uralkodja, a mjnak s valamennyi szervnek is vannakfeladatai, de a szv fellrja valamennyit.

JAMES OSCHMAN: There's a concept in energy medicine called "energycardiology," that says that the signals produced by the heart are all of

regulatory importance.

Az energia gygyszatban ltezik egy elkpzels amelyet energiakardiolginak neveznek. Ez azt lltja, hogy az sszes jel, melyet a szvllt el szablyoz jelentssggel br.

34


35/54

NARRATOR: The heart is constantly emitting sound, pressure waves, heat, light,

electrical, magnetic, and electromagnetic signals.

A szv llandan hangokat, nyoms-hullmokat, meleget, fnyt, elektromos-,mgneses- s elektromgneses jeleket bocst ki.

JAMES OSCHMAN: All of the cells in the body are receiving these different

kinds of signals at different times, because they travel at different

velocities through the circulatory system.

Testnk minden sejtje ms-ms idkznknt fogja ezeket a klnbz jeleket,mivel ezek vlzot sebessggel terjednek a keringsi rendszerben.

ROLLIN MCCRATY: The heart generates before the largest rhythmic,

electromagnetic signal in the body. If you look at the, this magnetic field,

as a carrier wave, it's being modulated with information. So it's the carrier

wave for information. And work in our lab is, you know, quite clearly, it'smodulated with emotional patterns; in other words, if we're feeling angry

or frustrated, irritated. The information that's being imprinted on thatmagnetic field is very different than if we're feeling care or love or

compassion towards that person.

A szv generlja a legnagyobb ritmikus, elektromagnetikus jelet a testben. Haerre s a mgneses mezre, mint vv hullmra tekintnk, lthatjuk hogyinformcival van modullva. Teht ez az informci vv hullmja. Atestnkben foly munka, belthat mdon, rzelmi mintkkal vanmodullva; pldul ha mrgesek, frusztrltak vagy ingerlkenyek vagyunka mgneses mezre tvitt informci nagyon klnbzik attl, minthaszeretetet, trdst vagy rszvtet reznnk.

NARRATOR: The heart has been found to have rhythmic beating patterns that can be

incoherent or coherent. These patterns are closely linked to our emotionsand how we feel.

Felfedeztk, hogy a szvnek klnbz koherens, vagy inkoherens ritmikusdobogsi minti vannak. Ezek a mintk szorosan kapcsoldnak azrzelmeinkhez s ahhoz, hogy hogyan rznk.

DEBORAH ROZMAN: When the heart's rhythmic beating pattern is smooth andordered, it's called a coherent rhythm. And that coherent rhythm, entrains

or synchronizes the brain rhythm, the nervous system, the bodily organs

and glands, all dance in harmony to that heart coherent rhythm.

Ha a szv ritmikus dobogsa sima s rendezett, azt koherens ritmusnak nevezzk.s ez a koherens ritmus hangolja be s szinkronizlja az agy ritmust. Az

35


36/54

idegrendszer, a test szervei s a mirigyek mind harmonikusan mkdnekegytta szv koherens ritmusra.

ROLLIN MCCRATY: Positive emotions, what we tend to call positive, things like

love, appreciation, care, forgiveness, gratitude, all lead to a very different

kind of heart pattern in negative things, like if we're feeling anger orirritation, anxiety; those create what are called incoherent rhythm, or

disordered patterns. On the other hand, we have the positive feelings,

when we're appreciating the sunset and how beautiful it is. When ourheart's beating out to what we call coherent rhythm, it's a sine wave like

pattern that the heart is sending to the brain.

A pozitv rzelmek, amikre hajlamosak vagyunk azt mondani, hogy pozitvak mint pldul szeretet, elismers, trds, megbocsts, hla mind igenklnbz szv mintt eredmnyeznek, a negatv dolgokhoz kpest, mintamikor dhsek vagy ingerltek vagyunk, vagy aggdunk, ezek mind

olyan mintt hoznak ltre, amith inkoherens ritmusnak vagy rendezetlenmintnak neveznk. Ezzel szemben pozitv rzseink tmadnak amikor anaplementt csodljuk, hogy milyen gynyr. Amikor a szvnkgynevezett koherens ritmusban ver, akkor a szv szinusz-hullm szermintzatot kld az agynak.

DEBORAH ROZMAN: And we call it "heart coherence" because in research wefind that the heart has to get into this synchronized, coherent, rhythmic

pattern of heart rate in order for the rest of the brain and the nervous

system and body to entrain and synchronize to that powerful rhythm. So itstarts with the heart.

Mi szvkoherencinak hvjuk, mert a kutatsokban azt talljuk, hogy a szvnekennek a szinkronizlt, koherens ritmikus minta szerint kell vernie ahhoz,hogy az agy s az idegrendszer

Documents

The Living Matrix - magyar szöveg