The relation between bulge and SMBH and its evolution

  • Upload
    aziza

  • View
    47

  • Download
    10

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The relation between bulge and SMBH and its evolution. M-L and M-sigma relation. In local quiescent galaxies(Kormendy 1993a, Kormendy & Richstone 1995 Gebhardt et al., 2000). 更多的研究: AGN 中此关系仍成立 (McLure and Dunlop, 2002; Nelson et al., 2004). M-L 的弥散很大部分由观测造成 (0304274) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • The relation between bulge and SMBH and its evolution

  • M-L and M-sigma relationIn local quiescent galaxies(Kormendy 1993a, Kormendy & Richstone 1995 Gebhardt et al., 2000)

  • AGN (McLure and Dunlop, 2002; Nelson et al., 2004).M-L (0304274) 0.2% (McLure and Dunlop, 2002)M-n (astro-ph/0607378)

  • Our aimsM-sigma and M-L M-sigma and M-L M-sigma and M-L

  • Quiescent HST

    AGN2-d image modelling (GALFIT) Integrating field and AOI 3D On-axis spectrum with MCS deconvolution method 2D The AGN-galaxy spectral decomposition algorithm 1D

    Advantages and disadvantages

  • HST , :a)b) Leonard & Merritt 1989

    0.1pc + Plummer

    John Kormendy & Karl Gebhardt 2004Genzel 2000

  • Why BH? Spitzer& Hart 1971Plummer potential Zapoosky Salpeter 1969Eyal Maoz 1998

  • 2-D modelling

    M-L

  • F. Eisenhauer et al 2000

  • K. JAHNKE et al 2003PSF

  • On-axis spectrum with MCS deconvolution methodPSFAGN

    Courbin et al 1998P.Magain et al 1997

  • 1060---&--- AGN

    XBDong et al 2004

  • ::2D-modelling:AOIOn-axis spectrum: AOI

  • Mbh- : :

  • Silk & Rees (1998)

    vs>

  • King, A. R. et al. (2003, 2005, 2006) ve>vm tC =tflow Rcve>>vmRc vm=

  • Adams, et al. (2003) aeff

    p

  • Begelman, & Nath (2005) 100 ()M4

  • Burkert & Silk (2001) rcr=GMbh/sph2 rcrtsf

  • Haehnelt & Kauffmann (2000) Mbhsph2

  • Ostriker (2000) self-interacting Mbh4-4.5

  • Miralda-Escude & Kollmeier (2005) Mbh30/7

  • BH mass distribution Vestergaard 2004, ApJ, 601, 676) Low redshift(3.5): 150 quasars

  • M-LM-SIGMA 311.7-4.510-12Grys ago.1.0-1.7,8-10Gyrs ago20MbhKormendy&Geb-hardt(2001)LRBettonietal.(2003)(Mbh )R (MR)log(MBH/M)= .0.50(0.06)MR.2.70(1.35)Peng Chien Y, Impey Chris D , Ho Luis C, et al. The A strophysical Journal, 2006, 640(1): 114 125.

  • :M-LM-SIGMA

  • 1.7
  • :M-LM-SIGMA M-L

  • & P. L.Biermann AAS VOL.41 NO.4

  • ,(nearby,normal early-type galaxies,excluding lenticular galaxies),(Mbh) ,.

  • [1] Silk J., Rees M. J., 1998, A&A, 331, L1[2] Blandford R. D., 1999, in Galaxy Dynamics, ASP Conf. (astro-ph/9906025)[3] Fabian A. C., 1999, MNRAS, 308, L39[4] Burkert A., Silk J., 2001, ApJ, 554, L151[5] Adams F. C., Graff K. S., Mbonye M., Richstone D. O., 2003, ApJ, 591, 125[6] Merritt, D., & F, L., 2001, ApJ., 547, 140[7] King, A. R., Pounds, L. A., 2003, MNRAS (astro-ph/0305541)[8] King A. R., 2003, ApJ, 596, L27[9] King, A. R., 2005, ApJ, 635, L121[10] Mclaughlin, D. E., King, A. R., Nayakshin, S. astro-ph/0608521[11] Miralda-Escude J., Kollmeier J. A., 2005, ApJ, 619, 30[12] Granato,G.L., DeZotti,G.; Silva,L.; Bressan,A.; Danese,L., astro-ph/0307202[13] Begelman, M. C., & Nath, B. B. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 1387 [14] Courbin et al 1998 astro-ph/9802156[15] Courbin et al 2002 A&A astro-ph/0208514[16] Eyal Maoz 1998 [17] F. Eisenhauer et al 2000 astro-ph/0001454[18] Genzel 2000 MNRAS, 317,348[19] John Kormendy & Karl Gebhardt 2001 astrop-ph/0105230[20] K. JAHNKE et al 2003 astro-ph/0311208[21] P.Magain et al 1997 astro-ph/9704059[22] XBDong et al 2004 astro-ph/0411171[23] X. B. Dong et al 2006 astro-ph/0610145 APJ