Upload
others
View
16
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Title 稠密地震観測による近畿地方北部の地震活動と地殻構造
Author(s) 片尾, 浩; 三浦, 勉; 飯尾, 能久
Citation 京都大学防災研究所年報. B = Disaster Prevention ResearchInstitute Annuals. B (2013), 56(B): 167-172
Issue Date 2013-09
URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/181552
Right
Type Departmental Bulletin Paper
Textversion publisher
Kyoto University
!
!
!
!
!
!"#$%&'()*+#,-./#$012#345!!
!
The Seismicity and the Crustal Structure of the Northern Kinki District
Investigated by the Dense Seismic Array Observations
!
!
!"! #$%&! '$(")*!!
Hiroshi KATAO, Tsutomu MIURA and Yoshihisa IIO
!
Synopsis!
In the northern Kinki district, we have done seismic observations using the dense
seismic array stations since 2008. Total 150 temporal and permanent stations are used,
and the average interval between the stations is about 5km. Using these data, we have
investigated the seismic velocity structure, the shape and distribution of the reflector in
the lower crust, the Moho and the PHS plate, the focal mechanisms and the stress field
etc. The results of these observations and other geophysical data exhibit and characterize
the strong contrast between the Tamba region and the Oumi Basin region. Difference of
these two region caused to the geometry of subducting PHS plate beneath this area and
the distribution and the movement of fluid in the crust.
!
67879:!+,-./0123-4156-.1-7891-7:;!
Keywords: dense seismic array, Kinki district, micro-earthquake, crustal structure,
geofluid
!
!
;<! =>?'!
! 23-4<=><?$@AB-CDEF<=GH
IFJ=KLMNO><P4QRSTUVWXYZ
-[\1]^_Q56-.`ab`cd-[efUg
h>-.`a\Ji_Q\jkl]^_efUb1
mnQ`aobDpqrstuvbwxylLz1
{|}>rsQ~�Q�{TU���fU���x
yl�Ug2�QL�l�12003 ���-.`a>
��b��l�U����yl�UC!"12005aKg
23-4Q\`�Bb�q1�]>`��Q���
�_�bz���]^_d-.`a\1��� Q
L�l�f¡z¢v>d��£d�>���xyU
C!"12002Kb1-.`a>¤¥Q��l\¦�
§¨©ª«l�d�ghy¡e>¬q>®QMz
¯°b±²�yl�U-�³=>:;b1@AB-
>]^`a>´¥�O>`arsQDpqµ¶tl
�U�>���xyUC!"12005bKb1O>·¸
>ukQ\¹ºd-�89Q»TU¼½b¾¿ef
Ug2�1ÀÁ/0Â>ÃÄQMz1��� Å[
bÆÇÈ20km ÉÊ>Ë�o-./0ÂeÌÍÎ�
yl�Ugtªtdbx1ÏÐ-.>¤¥®¸>u
k-7Ï�Ñ©d·ÒoeÓUukQ\1�xQ+
,d-./0�ÔÕ¾¿bfUg
@<! !"#$%&!
! Ö×®Ø-.Ùw®ÚÛÜÎe\12008 �Ý
MzÞßà>áâ�ãäJå>æç_èé/0$
®ê>ëì�tl1VWXYZªx@AB-Qªí
l45ç>îï/0ç�ðíl-./0�Ô«l�Ug
�xQ2010�4ñªx\á-.òN�Bó�Ùw>u
京都大学防災研究所年報 第 56 号 B 平成 25 年 6 月
Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 56 B, 2013
― 167 ―
k>/0®ôõêQLíUá23-4<=QLí
U-7`a£^�-.öÔ÷ø>»ù>·¸ê>ë
ì�tl12013�o¡eQ38ç>îï/0ç�úð
t/0�û�tl�UgC%&¦ª12010ü("1
2011K@A$VWXYZ-[>ãdx�1ýþªx
-./0çbÿ!ef«u2"#-P=Q�îï/
0ç�$%tl/0�Ô«l�U [Fig. 1]ghyx>
-./0ÂJ&=QLíU/0çÉÊ\ 5km��e
fz1ýþ>/0ç,o�\UªQ'(TU+,d
/0�)*TUh�QMz1Ë·Òoe-�89 �
+,t1h>-[>-.`a>¤¥LMNO>ïÉ
rs>¿¥��-Uh�b._efUg
! h>+,/0e\16/01 >Ë�o-.ô
C KVS-300K��234| >5ÎÜ 678%
CEDR-X7000KªxdU9t�-./0:;<=C�
>1?@efUáAç:;<=ê�BCK�DEt
lFGHIÛ/0�Ô «lLz1-.AJK�5Î
ܦLM�QëoN6�yl�Ughyx>îï/
0çQO�l1HIDPÖ×®ØQR-.Ùw
®ÚÛÜÎ>56-./0:;<= SATARNCDÓ
¦ª11999KQMUSTUÜI=<VWÎÜ]^/
0Â>5ÎÜ�XYtl5ÎÜZÎ;s�yl�U
C%&¦ª, 2010Kg/0LMN5ÎÜ>[\\]è
Q^§eLz1÷ïçe¦L _�ÉQ�uU`Dd
K�AJ5ÎÜbab�yl Lz1Oyxªxcø
dëes.fS;gQý«lIZÛgAJ5ÎÜ�
hzit1jakl0mn �]o^kxyl�Ug
! �pe\1hy¡eQ+,-./0ebxyu´
q�ÃrTU���Q1s>®´q��Y�tl,
23-4>-.`a�-789�>»ùQ��l�
u�vãUg
!
@<;! #$ABC45
! +,-./05ÎÜQÀwp1gxyHGzQM
U{oe|o89·}�^kl�Ug Fig. 2C~�K
\Thurber (1993)>4�Qý�1Ùu_QÔ«ugx
yHGz·}QMU PA|o>���±tu�>e
fUgVWXYZªx@AB-QªílP<—Y�
4�Q�Nu�|oåb¯°TUh�±�yl�Ug
h>�|oå\56-.`ab`cd-[�¦Lë
�TUg
! Fig. 2C��K\1K�.f�]CJHDK� (Kissling
et al., 1994)QM«l���oe89��ku�Q�
i�yu/0ç���>©�efUg�\�>��
�1�\�>���e�>Dp�\O>�����
Tgh>}Y1/0ç���\�/0ç�>|o8
9bÅ;>ÆǪx¨y¦¨�yl�Uª���t
l�U�>���xyUgVWXPZ>�q�ª>
/0çeDpd�>����d«l�U>\1-�
Fig. 1 Distribution of the seismic stations. The
Yellow and Red circles show the temporal stations
installed by this study. Others are permanent
stations.
Fig. 2 (Upper) Results of tomography. Red means
lower velocity, and blue means higher. (Middle)
1-D velocity structure derived by JHD analyses
(Lower) Station corrections for the P and S travel
times derived by JHD analyses.
― 168 ―
��>�\�QMU�>efUb1O>��>VW
XYZ��e1PASA��Q1�>�b�q©�t
l�Ughyx\1 Á~Qð%tu/0çb¬�
h�ªx1��e\dq~=-7Å;b¡¢_�|
oefUh��±tl�U£)¤bfUghy\¥
¦>gxyHGz>§q��ÃY_efUg
!
@<@! D$E4FGHI!
! �¨C2012K\1+,/0>AJ5ÎÜ�D�1
©a>ªt«p©�ªx¬,d c.8��kug
Ë�/0ç,oQM«l1cød®y¯°±Î²0.5
�~>-.Q��l\¦L³ydq¬o>´�c.
8·bbxyUh��±tugD1>c.8·
QÀw�u{|<ÛµUIÛÍζ·ÛQM«l1
23-4<=>{|}>¸É_d©���kugO
>§q1VWXYZ-[\ë¹tlPYº»>¼�
�_d{|}efU>Q�t1½¾��MzY4>
@A-[e\PYº»>¿1dbx1¿21¿3bÀÁ
tQq�{|}efUh�b±�yug[Fig. 3]
@<J! K.#3LMN!
<?$@A-[>56-.e\1©a>9G12Â>
QÃÄd>�Ab/0�yU vb¬qÓxy1Oy
x\³�È20G25km>ÉQ¯°TU<ÅÆ>�Ç
�Qªx�Çtlpu SAefUh�bwxyl�
UC!"11994ü!"12005b; !"¦ª12007Kg
� C̈2013K\�®>+,-./05ÎÜ�E�1
È-[QPY��<>0É�OyÊy 11��ð]t
l1Q��E�uËÌ>��� �EtuAJÍrQM
U�Ç�_·}�Ô�1�Ç�>3oe_dIWζ
Ûy�Ô«ugO>§q³�bÈ 25 kmG30 kmQ¯
°TU�Ç�\¦LÎÆefUh�1¡uh>�Ç
�>¯°ÏÐ\@A-[>56-.cÑ[�ÒÓë
�t1VWXYZ-[¡e\ò§e�d�h�b¸
xª�d«u[Fig. 4]guÔt1VWXYZÕz>-
[Q��!_d�Ç�\¯°TU£)¤bfzC!
"12012K1ÖÎ×AªxØ]�yuÙÚÛo©�
e\VWXYZ�Üku23<=>56-.cÑ[
�>�=-7Q\�qÛÙÚbÝkxyUCDIÞ
D.×0ßs�Áàá¶âãg1 2006Kg
@<O! PQNR(STUVWXYZ[7\!
+,/05ÎÜ�E�u V:ÎÍGäÛã:·Û
·}QMz1�=-7ªx~=®ÛgUQåU89
IWζÛybÔ�yu Cæç¨1 2011Kghy�
Fig. 3 Distribution of the type of stress field at the
northern Kinki district. Green circles mean the
reverse fault type field; red are strike-slip type;
gray means “not specified”. (Aoki , 2012)
Fig. 4 Distribution of S-wave reflector in the
lower crust. The reflector exists within the area
shown by the purple mesh. (Aoki, 2013)
Fig. 5 Cross sections of the receiver function
images along the EW line at the northern Kinki
district. (Aoki, 2013)
― 169 ―
ýþ>]^/0e\1/0çbèxefUuké¸
dIWζbbxydª«ub1+,/0QMzA
É,o>Ë�é¸dIWζ�bUh�bepUM
ÕQd«u�>efUg[Fig. 5]
@A-[�VWXYZe\xê�>JëQì�b
fUg½¾��Q2�íQ1Y�e\xê�\³�
È35kmfuzQÎÆ>îxªd��tlIWζ
Ûy�yU>Q�t1P�e\ïð>ñt�òyu
��tlIWζÛy�yUg
O>�>GzSóÛôàVÎg \gõñQY�b
zQÅÆtl�Uö÷bø�xy ugh>-[e\
ùãúûGzSóÛôàVÎgÏe\-.\cÑt
lLx�1.f©�ªxàVÎgJë�wUh�\
epd�gàVÎg~�>³�\1<?$@AB-
>�e\ 60G70kmQütl�Ub1Y�bz>Å
Æ�P4>2"#-ýþÿTU�³�\ 40km�!
�dz1¦Lxê�QSTU¡eQ~b«lqUg
J<! ]^_)%&F`7a!
J<;<! bcd45!
! ½¾��åLMNVWXYZ��å�PY4�Q
"hU0ÉeÔ�yu 4c¡#$/0QMU�1½
¾���íQY�>@AB-e\-7!=¡e�¡
#$efU>Q�t1VWX�\¡¢_Ë¡#$e
fUh�b±�yl�UC%&¦ª12005Kghy
¡e�-eÔ�yu¡#$89'éQM«l1(¿
d`��>¦L��>�=-7Q\�¡#$åb¯
°TUvb¬q1��>ap)-7:;>*pQ»
K>fU�>��yl�Ugë41½¾��Y4>
�¡#$;\¦L-�2q¡eütl�Uh�1�
��íQP4\Ë¡#$efU� �Õ+�@d89
�,TUh�Q�-bfUg [Fig. 6]
J<@! *ef#/#$01!
! 56-.`a\<?$@AB-e]^_Q`ce
fUg½¾���P>VWXYZ[e�]^_d`
abÓxyUb1-.cÑ.\@AB-Mz�/d
�g¡u-7Ï>56-.>cÑTU³�\1@A
B-e\³�15kmQ2b�0efUb1VWXYZ
e\PQÔq¦¨³qdz1VWX��e\È20km
QüTUg-.cÑ�>�0>³� \1çQrst
lÔq>e\dqg½¾��Q2�íQPYe2�
bfUMÕQ�Ó�Ug[Fig. 7]
! OyMzP�>VWXPZG2"#-e\156
-.><VWÎÜ/0b3¡«u 1970�4>M�þ
¦�§¨56-.\cÑtlLx�1Y4QRST
UVWXYZªx@AB-Qªíl>`cd-.`
a[�\�5«u�6�,tl�Ug<?$@A-
Fig. 7 Seismicity of the Tamba and Oumi area
during 1997 – 2012. (Upper) Epicenter distribution
(Middle) Time space distribution (Lower) EW
cross section
Fig. 6 Two dimensional resistivity structure across
the Hanaori fault obtained by inversion from TM
mode data (Yoshimura et al., 2005)
― 170 ―
[>]^_d`a>¤¥���Q12"#-[>�
`a>¤¥�ÈïQ·¸�yU7p÷øefU��
�xyUg
J<J! gHhi!
! VWX��\ÃÄd�>æ|£^�±T-[ef
UgO>ë¥\1VWX8Q�\�>�,oQMU
�>efUb1VWX>ÀÁ�\Y��íl³qd
U�>>�De� 1km¦¨>³oQT9d�g�>
æ|£^\1VWXYZªx@AB-Qªíl>�
�-[Qò§eLz1VWX>�\�Ôíehyx
>£^�:¸TUh�\epd�g Fig. 8\;<d=
oex5Ueæ|£^�v�tu�>efUb1@
A��2"�exê�>³oQ2���íuz1Y
Q�ílõñQÅp�bUGzSóÛôàVÎg�
ð]TUd¨1³=�ÜkuD>?d89�@]t
d��1/0�yUAAA>æ|£^�:¸t B�
h��±tl�Ug[Fig. 8]
!
O<! jAklmnopq#r/stuvwx
! �~ÓlpuMÕQ1 <?$@A-[�VWXY
ZC-[\¬q>�6_d�D�±Th�b�ªUg
hyx�¡�kU�1
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! @A! ! VWXYZGXP
c.8! ! ! E! F°! ! ! ¼��
-.`ao! ! E! �! ! ! JG�
-.cѳo! E! 5-15km! ! 10-20km
-.A|o! ! E! �! ! ! ! Ë
¡#$! ! ! ! E! �! ! ! ! Ë
�=-7�Ç�E! ÃÄ! ! ! G¸HG�
x�o! ! E! 35km! ! ! 40kmI
PHSàVÎg! E! 60km�³! 40km�!I
JÎKΣ^ ! E! �! ! ! ! �!
��-L! ! ! E! QO;! ! ½M
>MÕQdUghyx>�D�©ª�É\1N?t
l½¾���tq\VWXYZ��fuzQ«íU
���xyUghyx>�D>JQ\1�®Qö
ÔTU®e�OÁQwxyl�u�>bfUb1
+,-./0Q4��yU�®>Ë·Òo>/0
QM«l1O>©�ÏÐ)1C-[e>�D>�£
býþQ¡7lP2Qé¸QÝQepUMÕQd«
u�>efUghy��R>áSÛ°TêQ¡�k
u�>bFig. 9QdUg
! hyx>�D>ì�\-7Ï>:;©�>ì�Q
MU£)¤bËq1UVl@A�e\ SA�Ç�>¯
°)��¡#$d¨-7Å;Q�u«l:;>»W
�X�tU�DbÓxyUg YQL�l\ùãú
û;HJbZÎt1~[tu:;b-7Ï>-.`
a�\]TU���xyl�Ug@A��e\Gz
SóÛôàVÎg\³�.Ñ kmQütl�Uxt
�h�bV:ÎÍGäÛã:·Û·}QMz±�y
ub12"#-�e\¦Lxê�QSTU¦¨>!
�^%QfUh�b±²�yUgh>àVÎg³o
>ì�b:;cÑë_>ì��d z1â�l\O>
�~QLíU-.`a>�£��uxtl�U>e
\d�Ô`ÕªI¡u12"#->�>!�àVÎ
g\O>~>-7Q�tl|P_Q�µ¶�W�l
�Uª�tyd�g
!
Fig. 8 Two dimensional density structure model and
theoretical gravity profiles by method of Talwani
(1959) along the EW line across the lake Biwako.
Fig. 9 schematic structure model across the Tamba
and Oumi region
― 171 ―
y<! Rz{'!
�®>+,/0\a>�.�Q�uz�íxy1
5ÎÜ��xQ[\t1Mz¬,d·}�Ô«lÔ
qÙ]efUg�pe\÷ïçe�ª«lpubc
�Ãrtl1��bUâ��>x5U�detuQ
m9�1a>>/0LMNs©f>5ÎÜ�azg
yuUY_d·}>^hQý«l1Mz¬,dx5
U>8i�.�T�>efUg
|! }!
�®e\1Þ=ßPà>jknláâ�ãäJ
å>æç_èé/0$®ê1òNá-.òN�B
ó�Ùw>uk>/0®ôõêQLíUá23-
4<=QLíU-7`a£^�-.öÔ÷ø>»ù
>·¸êQMUîï-./0ç>5ÎÜ�DEtug
�xQ1HIDPÖ×®Ø-.ÙwÚÛÜÎ>5
6-./0:;<=C SATARNKQ67�yl�U
ÈÚÛÜÎ1PHDP-.®Ø1mnoDP1p
nqrUY®Ø1cød1Ö×ßP®Ø>]^
/0ç>5ÎÜ�DEtl� Ug
�®>/0Â>ð%dxNQs�15ÎÜÍr
tQ\1uvP1J"wx, J"y÷12z{| , }
v~�41zv�´1Y&{#>��dxNQ1Ö
×®Øqr�;Ü�G>¬Dd��|��|��
�l�Ug
ë=>�>m´Q\Wessel and SmithC1998K>
Generic Mapping Tools�DEtug
~���!
�¨��$!"! #$(")*$%&! '$J"y
÷$uv! P$}v~�4$J"wxC2012KE+
,-./0QMU23-4<=QLíUW̯�
=·�{|} , HIDPÖ×®Ø�½ , 55, B, pp.
121-140.
�¨�C2013KE23-4<=QLíU-7ÏSA�
Ç89>Ø]1HIDPrP®ß���Þ .
(")*C2010KEÏÐ-.>cÑm�>·¸ , �
�×�ßP , J. JSNDS, 28-4, pp. 284-298.
DÓ�x$����$Æf��$J��$�ÏÞ�$
!"#$�Ï�÷$!v6Ô$6��$�z ${
v¡¢$£¤¥x$J"wx$¦&ë|$§¨�$
2z{|$���C1999KE56-./0ÂSATARN
:;<=>÷ë�Ò¿ , HIDPÖ×®Ø�½ ,
42, B-1, pp. 45-60.
!"#C1994KE23-456-.`a[��Q¯
°TUÃÄd-7Ï�Ç� , -©ª«ßP»KP
¬1994�YÈD¬Ùpä , E12-05.
!"#C2002KE@AB->-.`a, ñ-© , ®
þ38, pp. 42-49.
!"#C2005aKE@AB-QLíU�2>56-.
`a>¯°s , HIDPÖ×®Ø�½ , 48, B, pp.
167-174.
!"#C2005bKEÐ>~>Ϋ±�² -�Q23-
4ÏÐ=QLíU³=:;Q��l -, ñ-© ,
No.51, 286-292.
!"#C2012KEVWXYZ³½¾���´Q2e
ÓxyU³=�Ç� , ��-.P¬ 2012�oµ¶
D¬·¸Ùpä , P1-37.
!"#$�z $J"wx$¹ºë»$Y&{#$
¼ ~�4C2007KE@AB-��>-7³=�Ç
�>'é½DD�QMU¾¿$��-./0½, HI
DPÖ×®Ø�½ , 50, B, pp. 297-302.
æç¨�ÀC2011KE23-4<=>56-.`a
[��>-789>Ø] "S A�Ç��V:ÎÍ
».·}QMU"ÁHIDPrP®ß���Þ .
DIÞD.×0ßs�Áàá¶âãg1Æ´ 18�o
´q½ÂÃ1 I-.aCÛ�ÄyK>Ù01 3.4.2.1.
%&'$(")*$!"#$J"wx$uvP$z
v�´$2z{|$Y&{#$}v~�4$¬vÅ
Æ$Æf��$BÇÈÉ$ÊE{Ë$ÌÍÎë$O
Ï�¾$£¤¥x$DÓ�x$OÐÑÒC2010KE
23-4J<=QLíUîï-./0 , HIDP
Ö×®Ø�½, 53, B, pp. 203-212.
%&ÓÔ$ÕIÖ×$DØÙ�¾C 2005KE½¾$
VWXYZ��Ú��>4c¡#$89 , HID
PÖ×®Ø�½ , 48, B, pp. 143-148.
Kissling, E., W. L. Ellsworth, D. Eberhart-Phillips, and
U. Kradolfer, (1994): Initial reference models in local
earthquake tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 99, pp.
19635–19646.
Talwani, M., J. L.Worzwl and M. Landisman (1959):
Rapid gravity computation for two-dimensional bodies
with application to the Mendocino Submarine Fracture
Zone, J. Geophys. Res, 64, pp. 49-59.
Thurber, C. H. (1993): Local earthquake tomography:
velocities and Vp/Vs - theory, in Seismic Tomography:
Theory and Practice, edited by H. M. Iyer and K.
Hirahara.
Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith (1998): New Version of
the Generic Mapping Tools Released, EOS Trans. Am.
Geophys. Union, 76, pp. 329.
�������@�;J���;;��
― 172 ―