Transcript
Page 1: Comparative study of language and SLA research

Comparative study of language and SLA research

By Yu Yuxing 04/20/03

Page 2: Comparative study of language and SLA research

Different linguistic schools and their views on LA and SLA Structuralism: Bloomfield, form and structu

re Mentalist: Chomsky, TG and innativeness Cognitive linguistics: language knowledg

e---the projection of the object world in human being’s cognition system.(赵艳芳 )

References

Page 3: Comparative study of language and SLA research

The structuralist view on LA Children acquired their L1 by imitating their parent

s and receiving negative and positive reinforcements.

Language acquisition is environmentally determined.

L2 acquisition is shaped by manipulating the input to provide appropriate stimuli and by ensuring that adequate feedback is always available.

Acquisition--- controlled by external factorsthe learner---a passive mediumthe internal processing---ignored Back

Page 4: Comparative study of language and SLA research

The mentalist view Language is a human-specific faculty, separated fr

om the general cognitive mechanisms for intellectual development

LAD---the language acquisition device---determines language acquisition

The learners are equipped with innate knowledge of the possible forms of any language and in SLA learners use the information supplied by the input to arrive at the forms in the target language

Thus, the input is indeterminate Back

Page 5: Comparative study of language and SLA research

The cognitive view There exists a kind of innate knowledge in children’s cogniti

ve mechanism But this innate knowledge is not confined to a specific langu

age mechanism. Instead, it is a general learning mechanism responsible for all forms of cognitive development.

SLA is the product of the complex interaction of the linguistic environment and the learners’ internal mechanisms.

Input does have a determining function in LA, but only within the constraints imposed by the learner’s internal mechanism.

A theoretical framework: noticed input---comprehended input--- intake(explicit knowledge)---integration(implicit knowledge) (P349, Figure9.1) Back

Page 6: Comparative study of language and SLA research

References:

刘润清, 1999,《论大学英语教学》,外语教学与研究出版社

赵艳芳, 2001,《认知语言学概论》,上海外语教育出版社

Rod Ellis, 1999, The Study of Second Language Acquisition, 上海外语教育出版社

Page 7: Comparative study of language and SLA research

Research framework in SLA Lerner language Learner-external factors: social factors/input and

interaction Learner-internal mechanisms: L1

transfer/cognitive learning processes/communication strategies/ knowledge of linguistic universals

Language learner: motivation/affective factors/learning strategies

by Rod Ellis

Page 8: Comparative study of language and SLA research

SLA:Research on learner language

Error analysis Developmental patterns: order and seq

uence Variability in learner language

Page 9: Comparative study of language and SLA research

Error analysis Data collection Identification • error and mistake• overt and covert errors• correctness (usage) and appropriateness (use)

(Widdowson)• Corder: procedure of identifying errors (Rod Ellis, P53) Description: omissions, additions, misinformations,

misorderings. Explanation: competence (transfer, intralingual and

unique) errors and performance errors Limitations: no analysis of what learners can do

correctly/no developmental analysis/

Page 10: Comparative study of language and SLA research

Development patterns: order and sequence Silent period Formulaic speech (routines and patterns P84) Structural and semantic simplification Sequence and order• order: ing/plural copula---auxiliary article---irregular past---

regular past/3rd person singular/possessive ‘s’(P94 table3.1)• sequence: (e.g.: the acquisition of negation) external

negation---internal negation---negative attachment to modal verbs---negative attachment to auxiliary verb as in target language rule (P100 table3.6)

The L2=L1 hypothesis: the same fundamental principles and language acquisition device for L1 and L2? (P107table 3.10 )